作物杂志,2020, 第5期: 154–163 doi: 10.16035/j.issn.1001-7283.2020.05.023

• 生理生化·植物营养·栽培耕作 • 上一篇    下一篇

不同覆膜种类和还苗期灌溉方式对襄阳山区烟草生长发育的影响

郭笑恒1(), 魏烁果1, 王晓丽2, 徐锐2, 韩丹1(), 许自成1()   

  1. 1河南农业大学烟草学院,450002,河南郑州
    2湖北省烟草公司襄阳市公司,441003,湖北襄阳
  • 收稿日期:2020-03-28 修回日期:2020-06-05 出版日期:2020-10-15 发布日期:2020-10-12
  • 通讯作者: 韩丹,许自成
  • 作者简介:郭笑恒,研究方向为烟草品质生态与质量评价,E-mail: 1085201371@qq.com
  • 基金资助:
    中国烟草总公司湖北省公司重点科技攻关项目(027Y2019-012)

Effects of Different Types of Mulch Film and Irrigation Methods at Seedling Stage on Growth and Development of Tobacco in Xiangyang Mountain Area

Guo Xiaoheng1(), Wei Shuoguo1, Wang Xiaoli2, Xu Rui2, Han Dan1(), Xu Zicheng1()   

  1. 1Tobacco College of Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou 450002, Henan, China
    2Xiangyang Company of Hubei Tobacco Company, Xiangyang 441003, Hubei, China
  • Received:2020-03-28 Revised:2020-06-05 Online:2020-10-15 Published:2020-10-12
  • Contact: Han Dan,Xu Zicheng

摘要:

以云烟87为研究对象,于2018-2019年连续2年研究了烟草还苗期常规灌溉、轻度补灌和重度补灌3种灌溉方式与白膜、转光膜、配色膜和黑膜4种覆膜颜色互作对前期垄体膜下土温、土壤含水率,揭膜时烟株农艺性状、干物质积累量和烤后烟产质量的影响。结果表明:在不同补灌条件下,补灌方式对垄体膜下土温影响较小;在相同补灌条件下,白膜和转光膜升温效果优于配色膜和黑膜;垄体膜下0~15cm土壤含水率表现为黑膜>配色膜>转光膜>白膜,15~30cm土层土壤含水率表现为白膜>转光膜>配色膜>黑膜。在相同覆膜处理下,移栽后1~7d土壤含水率随补灌量的增加呈上升趋势,0~15cm土层上升较显著。互作处理M-Z(轻度补灌+转光膜)揭膜时烟株、根茎叶干物质积累量最高,烤后烟的产质量表现最好。在襄阳山区采用轻度补灌+转光膜方式可促进烟株大田生育期前期生长发育,提升烟叶产量和质量。

关键词: 山区, 烤烟, 补灌, 覆膜颜色, 互作

Abstract:

In this study, Yunyan 87 was taken as study material. In 2018 and 2019, the interaction of three irrigation methods (conventional irrigation, mild supplementary irrigation and heavy supplementary irrigation) and four kinds of films (white film, light-transfer film, color matching film and black film) was studied on soil temperature and soil moisture content under ridging films at seedling stage, the agronomic characters and dry matter accumulation of tobacco plants when uncovering films, as well as the yield and quality of tobacco after roasting. The results showed that: the effect of supplementary irrigation methods on soil temperature under ridging films was small. The heating effect of white film and light-transfer film was better than that of color matching film and black film under the same supplementary irrigation condition, and the moisture content of 0-15cm soil under the color-coated ridging films was black film > color matching film > light-transfer film > white film, and the moisture content of 15-30cm soil was white film > light-transfer film > color matching film > black film. Under the same mulching treatment, the soil moisture content in the 1-7d after transplanting showed an increasing trend with the increasing of the supplemental irrigation amount, especially in the 0-15cm soil layer. The matter accumulation of roots, leaves and branches, as well as the yield and quality of flue cured tobacco were the best when the agronomic characters of tobacco plants were treated with M-Z (light supplementary irrigation + light film). Based on the comprehensive analysis, the technique of light supplementary irrigation + light film could promote the growth and development of tobacco plants in the early stage and improve the yield and quality of tobacco leaf.

Key words: Mountain area, Flue-cured tobacco, Supplementary irrigation, Film color, Interaction

表1

试验处理

处理Treatment 白膜White film 转光膜Light transfer film 黑膜Black film 配色膜Color matching film
常规灌溉Conventional irrigation C-B C-Z C-H C-P
轻度补灌Mild supplement irrigation M-B M-Z M-H M-P
重度补灌Heavy supplement irrigation H-B H-Z H-H H-P

图1

试验期间田间气候

图2

“补灌+覆膜颜色”互作对垄体膜下土温的影响

图3

“补灌+覆膜颜色”互作对垄体膜下0~15cm土层土壤含水率的影响

图4

“补灌+覆膜颜色”互作对垄体膜下15~30cm土壤含水率的影响

表2

“补灌+覆膜颜色”互作对揭膜时烟株农艺性状的影响

年份
Year
覆膜颜色
Film color
有效叶片数
Effective blade number
株高
Plant height (cm)
茎围
Stem circumference (cm)
叶长
Leaf length (cm)
节间距
Pitch interval (cm)
C M H C M H C M H C M H C M H
2018 B 10.50a 13.67a 11.00a 42.51ab 63.25a 44.10ab 6.24ab 6.89ab 6.50ab 52.30ab 60.84ab 53.94a 5.10abc 6.25b 5.59ab
Z 10.84a 14.00a 11.17a 47.58a 63.67a 49.22a 6.32a 7.00a 6.64a 53.00a 62.17a 54.35a 5.39a 6.69a 5.79a
H 9.84ab 13.67a 10.17a 35.56c 57.42b 38.04c 6.02b 6.67bc 6.37bc 50.40c 58.84c 50.77b 4.79c 6.09bc 5.39c
P 10.17a 13.67a 10.67a 39.27bc 62.59ab 41.29bc 6.16ab 6.72ab 6.47ab 51.53bc 59.50bc 53.54a 4.98bc 6.25b 5.47bc
变异来源Source of variation
补灌Supplementary irrigation (SI) ** ** ** ** **
覆膜颜色Film color (FC) * ** ** * **
SI×FC ns ns ns ns ns
2019 B 10.67abc 13.34ab 11.00ab 41.85ab 57.50a 45.45a 6.27ab 6.85a 6.69ab 51.39b 58.59ab 53.97b 4.97ab 5.97ab 5.85a
Z 11.17a 13.67a 11.17a 44.08a 60.92a 45.42a 6.46a 7.05a 6.87a 52.91a 59.42a 55.32a 5.25a 6.37a 5.99a
H 10.00c 12.50b 10.00c 39.94b 51.50b 41.05b 6.19b 6.84a 6.47b 49.88c 57.37b 51.59c 4.69b 5.84b 5.44b
P 10.17bc 13.00ab 10.67abc 43.42a 57.00a 45.25a 6.31ab 6.84a 6.57ab 50.32bc 57.92ab 52.54bc 4.86ab 5.84b 5.84a
变异来源Source of variation
补灌Supplementary irrigation (SI) ** ** ** ** **
覆膜颜色Film color (FC) ** ** * * *
SI×FC ns ns ns ns ns

图5

“补灌+覆膜颜色”对揭膜时烟株干物质积累量的影响

表3

“补灌+覆膜颜色”互作对烤后烟经济性状的影响

年份
Year
覆膜颜色
Film color
上等烟比例
Proportion of upper class tobacco (%)
产量
Yield (kg/hm2)
均价(元/kg)
Average price (yuan/kg)
产值(元/hm2)
Output value (yuan/hm2)
C M H C M H C M H C M H
2018 B 22.58ab 28.33b 23.38ab 1 465.57abc 1 690.16ab 1 532.88a 19.52a 20.67ab 20.67ab 28 755.78b 35 262.98b 30 455.00ab
Z 24.17a 32.77a 26.19a 1 487.66a 1 840.66a 1 521.76a 19.84a 21.56a 21.56a 29 671.04a 40 061.69a 31 105.45a
H 21.45b 24.35c 23.83ab 1 290.77c 1 288.98c 1 310.94b 19.29a 19.87b 19.87bc 25 043.45c 25 815.78c 26 177.17c
P 21.84b 27.48bc 22.16b 1 468.68abc 1 625.38b 1 526.22a 19.37a 20.50ab 20.50abc 28 616.72b 33 585.05b 29 810.38ab
变异来源Sourceof variation
补灌Supplementary irrigation (SI) ** ns ns ns
覆膜颜色Film color (FC) ** ** ** **
SI×FC ** ** ns **
2019 B 22.16ab 27.28b 23.87b 1 254.43b 1 650.63b 1 344.60c 19.44a 20.46ab 19.78ab 24 499.02b 33 908.03b 26 709.81c
Z 23.54a 31.70a 25.24a 1 384.34a 1 808.24a 1 533.33a 19.71a 21.34a 20.05a 27 424.77a 38 758.71a 30 885.71a
H 20.56bc 23.79c 22.13c 1 076.35d 1 216.26d 1 155.78d 19.12a 19.76b 19.43b 20 681.40d 24 140.48d 22 560.42d
P 21.05b 26.37b 23.55b 1 189.35c 1 488.51c 1 442.52b 19.21a 20.28ab 19.71ab 22 973.15c 30 319.64c 28 573.58b
变异来源Source of variation
补灌Supplementary irrigation (SI) ** ** ** **
覆膜颜色Film color (FC) ** ** ** **
SI×FC ** ** ** **

表4

“补灌+覆膜颜色”互作对烤后烟烟叶物理性状的影响

年份
Year
覆膜颜色
Film color
叶长
Leaf length (cm)
单叶重
Single leaf weight (g)
含梗率
Leaf specific weight (%)
叶面密度
Foliar density (g/m2)
叶面积质量
Leaf area quality (g/cm2)
C M H C M H C M H C M H C M H
2018 B 57.00ab 62.00ab 58.67b 8.26a 9.89b 8.76a 31.32ab 29.27ab 31.97ab 79.90a 80.42b 80.17b 103.85a 102.33a 103.56a
Z 60.34a 63.84a 62.34a 8.36a 10.67a 8.59ab 29.44b 27.31b 30.97b 80.72a 83.01a 82.68a 104.90a 107.96a 105.26a
H 52.34c 57.84c 54.17c 6.79b 7.36d 7.21c 32.69a 33.78a 32.14a 73.88b 76.50c 74.96c 100.15a 112.48a 102.69a
P 56.67ab 61.00abc 58.00b 7.85ab 8.67c 8.32b 32.24a 31.31ab 32.03a 79.52a 80.04b 79.90b 102.33a 98.78a 104.95a
变异来源Source of variation
补灌Supplementary irrigation (SI) ** ** ns * ns
覆膜颜色Film color (FC) ** ** * ** ns
SI×FC ns ** ns ns ns
2019 B 56.67ab 60.67b 58.67bc 7.54b 9.28b 7.95b 31.10ab 29.89ab 30.79ab 77.51ab 76.63b 78.27ab 100.41a 105.42ab 101.99ab
Z 59.00a 63.00a 61.67a 8.04a 10.46a 8.77a 30.40bc 26.88c 30.19b 79.96a 84.14a 81.22a 100.72a 110.56a 104.69a
H 52.67c 55.84c 55.00c 7.15b 7.42d 7.35c 34.09a 31.52a 33.87a 72.70c 70.37c 67.65c 100.23a 98.33b 96.41b
P 54.00abc 57.00c 57.34bc 7.38b 8.71c 8.32ab 31.60ab 30.23ab 31.82ab 77.65ab 74.96bc 76.99b 100.98a 101.51b 101.62ab
变异来源Source of variation
补灌Supplementary irrigation (SI) ** ** * ns ns
覆膜颜色Film color (FC) ** ** * ** ns
SI×FC ns ** ns ** ns

表5

“补灌+覆膜颜色”互作对烤后烟烟叶化学成分含量的影响

年份
Year
覆膜颜色
Film color
总糖Total suger (%) 还原糖Reducig sugar (%) 烟碱Nicotine (%) 钾Kalium (%)
C M H C M H C M H C M H
2018 B 24.87b 27.47b 25.20b 22.06b 25.49b 23.21b 2.18b 2.31b 2.27b 2.07b 2.22b 2.14b
Z 26.78a 29.99a 28.48a 23.78a 27.80a 25.80a 2.27a 2.44a 2.41a 2.16a 2.76a 2.28a
H 22.67d 21.82c 23.12d 20.13c 19.95c 21.09d 2.12d 1.86c 2.17d 1.86d 1.86d 1.97c
P 23.68c 27.39b 24.53c 20.99c 25.45b 22.50c 2.16c 2.31b 2.22c 1.93c 2.17c 1.99c
变异来源Source of variation
补灌Supplementary irrigation (SI) ** ** ** **
覆膜颜色Film color (FC) ** ** ** **
SI×FC ** ** ** **
2019 B 24.67b 27.48bc 25.01b 21.89b 25.55b 22.89b 2.01b 2.24ab 2.08b 1.98b 2.12b 2.08b
Z 26.56a 29.35a 27.78a 23.67a 27.35a 25.49a 2.15a 2.31a 2.25a 2.15a 2.61a 2.25a
H 21.45d 20.71d 21.90c 19.16c 19.07c 19.80c 1.85d 1.81c 1.88c 1.85c 1.78c 1.97c
P 23.89c 27.16c 24.99b 21.34b 25.27b 22.70b 1.97c 2.26ab 2.08b 1.90bc 2.10b 2.00bc
变异来源Source of variation
补灌Supplementary irrigation (SI) ** ** ** **
覆膜颜色Film color (FC) ** ** ** **
SI×FC ** ** ** **
年份
Year
覆膜颜色
Film color

Chlorine (%)
钾氯比
Kalium-chlorine ratio
糖碱比
Sugar-nicotine ratio
两糖比
The ratio of reducing sugar to total sugar (%)
C M H C M H C M H C M H
2018 B 0.21b 0.28b 0.22b 9.86a 8.13c 9.77ab 10.12b 11.07b 10.27b 0.89a 0.93a 0.93a
Z 0.26a 0.32a 0.30a 8.31d 8.63a 7.80c 10.48a 11.41a 10.72a 0.89a 0.93a 0.91c
H 0.20b 0.25c 0.21b 9.30c 7.65d 9.84a 9.50d 10.76c 9.72c 0.89a 0.92b 0.92b
P 0.20b 0.27bc 0.22b 9.65b 8.23b 9.33b 9.72c 11.04b 10.16bc 0.89a 0.93a 0.92b
变异来源Source of variation
补灌Supplementary irrigation (SI) ** ** ** **
覆膜颜色Film color (FC) ** ** ** **
SI×FC ns ** ** **
2019 B 0.21b 0.24b 0.24b 9.43ab 8.94a 8.82ab 10.90ab 11.43b 11.01b 0.89a 0.93a 0.92a
Z 0.25a 0.30a 0.27a 8.60c 8.99a 8.55b 11.01a 11.84a 11.35a 0.90a 0.94a 0.92a
H 0.20b 0.23b 0.22b 9.25b 7.84b 9.05a 10.36c 10.56d 10.55c 0.90a 0.93a 0.91a
P 0.20b 0.24b 0.23b 9.50a 8.93a 8.81ab 10.84b 11.23c 10.97b 0.90a 0.94a 0.91a
变异来源Source of variation
补灌Supplementary irrigation (SI) * ** ** **
覆膜颜色Film color (FC) ** ** ** ns
SI×FC * ** ** ns
[1] 刘国顺. 烟草栽培学. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2003.
[2] 蒋文昊. 不同灌水量对起垄覆膜烤烟生长发育及其产量影响的研究. 杨凌:西北农林科技大学, 2011.
[3] 邸慧慧, 史宏志, 王太运, 等. 微喷条件下灌水量对烤烟生长发育和水分利用效率的影响. 水利水电科技进展, 2009,29(6):17-20,24.
[4] 王毅, 夏磊, 王大海, 等. 不同地膜覆盖对烤烟膜下温度、根系生长及烟叶质量的影响研究. 陕西农业科学, 2018,63(9):18-21.
[5] 陈岗, 董继翠, 王跃金, 等. 打孔地膜覆盖对楚雄烟草生长发育和品质的影响. 烟草科技, 2018,50(9):37-41.
[6] Li F M, Wang J, Xu J Z, et al. Productivity and soil response to plastic film mulching durations for spring wheat on entisols in the semiarid Loess Plateau of China. Soil & Tillage Research, 2004,78:9-20.
[7] 董建, 丁灿. 不同颜色地膜膜下小苗移栽对烤烟产量及产值的影响. 现代农业科技, 2015(7):21-22.
[8] Shahzad A, Xu Y Y, Jia Q M, et al. Interactive effects of plastic film mulching with supplemental irrigation on winter wheat photosynthesis,chlorophyll fluorescence and yield under simulated precipitation conditions. Agricultural Water Management, 2018,207:1-14
doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2018.05.013
[9] 王星垚. 不同类型地膜覆盖和水分处理对冬小麦生长及产量的影响研究. 杨凌:西北农林科技大学, 2019.
[10] Liu Y, Li S Q, Chen F, et al. Soil water dynamics and water use efficiency in spring maize (Zea mays L.) fields subjected to different water management practices on the Loess Plateau,China. Agricultural Water Management, 2010,97(5):769-775.
doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2010.01.010
[11] Liu Y, Shen Y F, Yang S J, et al. Effect of mulch and irrigation practices on soil water,soil temperature and the grain yield of maize (Zea mays L) in Loess Plateau,China. African Journal of Agricultural Research, 2011,6(10):2175-2182.
[12] 姜俊红, 汪军, 劳同浩, 等. 调亏灌溉对粤北烤烟农艺性状及耗水规律的影响. 节水灌溉, 2016(1):10-15.
[13] 张颂培, 李建宇, 陈娟, 等. 我国农用转光膜的研究进展. 中国塑料, 2003(11):29-33.
[14] 国家技术监督局. GB 2635-1992 烤烟. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 1992: 3-7.
[15] 陈勇, 陶德欣, 鲁黎明. DNS法测定烟草还原糖条件的优化. 江苏农业科学, 2011,39(5):393-395.
[16] 李维莉, 马银海, 段姚俊, 等. 紫外分光光度法测定烟草中的游离烟碱. 安徽农业科学, 2012,40(6):3600-3601.
[17] 陈伟华, 鲍峰伟, 张晓静, 等. 微波消解-连续流动火焰光度法测定烤烟中的钾含量. 分析测试技术与仪器, 2010,16(2):120-122.
[18] 孔浩辉, 郭璇华, 沈光林, 等. 烟草中氯含量连续流动分析法的改进. 烟草科技, 2008(2):28-32,4.
[19] Liu C A, Jin S L, Zhou L M, et al. Effects of plastic film mulch and tillage on maize productivity and soil parameters. European Journal of Agronomy, 2009,31(4):241-249.
doi: 10.1016/j.eja.2009.08.004
[20] 路海东, 薛吉全, 郝引川, 等. 黑色覆膜对旱地玉米土壤环境和植株生长的影响. 生态学报, 2016,36(7):1997-2004.
doi: 10.5846/stxb201409301936
[21] 孙在军, 易建华, 刘建福, 等. 双转光地膜对烟草生长与生理特性及地温的影响. 中国生态农业学报, 2008(1):155-159.
[22] 张国平, 程万莉, 吕军峰, 等. 不同膜色对旱地土壤水热效应及马铃薯产量的影响. 灌溉排水学报, 2016,35(7):66-71.
[23] 雷俊, 赵福年, 张红兵, 等. 半干旱区不同颜色覆膜对春小麦生长和产量的影响. 干旱气象, 2019,36(4):561-567.
[24] Yang J, Mao X M, Wang K, et al. The coupled impact of plastic film mulching and deficit irrigation on soil water/heat transfer and water use efficiency of spring wheat in Northwest China. Agricultural Water Management, 2019,201:232-245.
doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2017.12.030
[25] 武荣, 闫小红, 李援农. 覆膜与补灌对冬小麦叶绿素和比叶面积的影响. 节水灌溉, 2019(9):27-30,36.
[26] 王龙昌, 贾志宽. 宁南山区冬小麦覆膜补灌试验研究. 西北农业学报, 1999(4):83-86.
doi: 10.7606/j.issn.1004-1389.1999.4.022
[27] 高亮, 张维宏, 杜雄, 等. 覆膜和补灌对杂交谷子产量形成与水分利用效率的影响. 作物学报, 2018,43(1):122-132.
[28] 孟霖, 徐宜民, 宋文静, 等. 红蓝单色光对水培烟草幼苗生长发育及生理特性的影响. 中国烟草学报, 2015,21(5):55-61.
doi: 10.16472/j.chinatobacco.2015.001
[29] 时向东, 王林枝, 满晓丽, 等. 不同光质对烤烟漂浮育苗中烟苗生长发育及光合特性的影响. 中国烟草学报, 2013,19(1):43-46.
[30] 韩富根, 彭丽丽, 马永建, 等. 不同采收成熟度对烤烟香气质量的影响. 土壤, 2010,42(1):65-70.
[31] 任志广, 陈征, 黄海棠, 等. 生态条件、栽培调制措施、烤烟工艺对烤烟上部叶可用性的影响. 中国农学通报, 2018,33(6):73-78.
[32] 王行, 张敏坚, 何振峰. 采收成熟度对烟叶烤后质量的影响. 中国农学通报, 2018,33(4):161-164.
[33] 叶为民, 罗岩峰, 潘义宏, 等. 不同采收成熟度对景东烤烟品质的影响. 南方农业学报, 2013,44(5):735-739.
[34] 徐盈, 许安定, 吴树成, 等. 不同覆膜及移栽方式对烤烟前期养分吸收与经济性状的影响. 河南农业科学, 2014,43(3):33-36.
[1] 申洪涛,张富生,李冬,邱建华,蔡兴宏,秦玉宝. 不同前茬和种植密度对牡丹江烤烟生长及产质量的影响[J]. 作物杂志, 2020, (2): 105–111
[2] 刘美菊,李江舟,计思贵,樊苗苗,谷星慧,张立猛,张劲伟,瞿兴,周文兵,林杉. 生物炭对山坡地烟叶产量和氮肥利用效率的影响效果评价[J]. 作物杂志, 2020, (1): 89–97
[3] 帅京彤,裴晓东,黎娟,张一扬. 开沟起垄措施对植烟土壤和烟叶产值的影响[J]. 作物杂志, 2019, (6): 114–119
[4] 闫威,李国龙,李智,曹阳,张少英. 施氮量和密度互作对全覆膜旱作甜菜光合特性和块根产量的影响[J]. 作物杂志, 2019, (4): 100–106
[5] 蒋南,龚湛武,陈力力,胡亚杰,韦建玉,王生才,李迪秦. 施用枯草芽孢杆菌的土壤养分含量与三大微生物间灰色关联分析[J]. 作物杂志, 2019, (3): 142–149
[6] 崔勇,马自清,田恩平. 20年来宁夏中南部山区农业生产发展分析[J]. 作物杂志, 2019, (2): 28–38
[7] 向德明,张明发,彭曙光,田峰,罗建新,陈武,蔡云帆,田明慧,吕启松. 连年施用新型肥料对土壤真菌群落及烤烟产质量的影响[J]. 作物杂志, 2019, (2): 156–163
[8] 杨欣玲,姚倩,平文丽,马一琼,王宝林,贾国涛,杨永锋,崔红. 烤烟EMS诱变后代高香气突变体筛选[J]. 作物杂志, 2019, (1): 68–74
[9] 柏文恋,郑毅,肖靖秀. 豆科禾本科间作促进磷高效吸收利用的地下部生物学机制研究进展[J]. 作物杂志, 2018, (4): 20–27
[10] 龚丝雨,钟思荣,张世川,聂亚平,梁喜欢,杨帅强,刘齐元. 增施生物炭对烤烟生长及产量、质量的影响[J]. 作物杂志, 2018, (2): 154–160
[11] 许杰,潘磊,杨帅,陈云松,邓盛斌,杨晓东,马文广. 烤烟烟叶钾含量的遗传效应分析[J]. 作物杂志, 2018, (2): 30–34
[12] 廖红蕖,陈红丽,范文思,陈宇,韩秋静,于建军,马明. 河南主产烟区土壤颗粒分形特征及对烟叶理化性状的影响[J]. 作物杂志, 2018, (1): 118–125
[13] 戴林建,:陈武,:周田,:钟军. 利用花药培养选育烤烟抗黑胫病突变体[J]. 作物杂志, 2018, (1): 66–70
[14] 闫寒,宋杭霖,张丽,闫晶,石贤吉,朱诗苗,刘璐,李虎林. 镉胁迫对烤烟农艺性状及生理生化指标的影响[J]. 作物杂志, 2017, (5): 156–161
[15] 黄刘亚,孙永波,刘书武,张永辉,年夫照,顾勇. 生物炭对植烟土壤主要性状和烤烟产质量影响的研究进展[J]. 作物杂志, 2017, (4): 15–20
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!