Crops ›› 2019, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (2): 94-98.doi: 10.16035/j.issn.1001-7283.2019.02.014

;

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Comprehensive Evaluation of Production Performance and Feeding Value of 9 Oat Varieties in Northern Shanxi

Fu Yang,Minna Zheng,Jiahui Kang,Xiuzhi Liang,Chao Jiang,Yinfan Li   

  1. High Latitude Crops Institute, Shanxi Academy of Agriculture Sciences, Datong 037008, Shanxi, China
  • Received:2018-10-17 Revised:2018-12-13 Online:2019-04-15 Published:2019-04-12

RichHTML

6

PDF (PC)

269

Abstract:

In order to study suitable forage germplasm for the agro-pasture ecotone of northern Shanxi, fresh and dry (hay) yields, agronomic characters, nutrient content and feeding value of 9 oat varieties were assessed. Three nutritional traits were determined and analyzed by conventional analysis, and the comprehensive evaluation was carried out by grey relational analysis method. The results showed that the yields of fresh and hay of Caoyou No.1, Molasses and Yuanza No.1 were higher from booting stage to flowering stage, and the hay yield of Caoyou No.1 at flowering stage reached 9 000kg/hm 2; Caoyou No.1 had the longest ear (24.56cm); The number of bolls per spike of Molasses was the largest, up to 84.64; the number of grains per spike of Yuanza No.1 (621) was the most; the maximum grain weight per spike of Molasses and Bayou No.18 were 17.16 and 16.28g, respectively (P<0.05); the 1000-grain weight of sweet oat (44.03g) was the largest, and the difference between the other species was significant (P<0.05). The digestible dry matter of varieties changed from 63.62% to 69.05% and dry matter intake from 1.91% to 2.22%; the relative feed value of Baiyan No.2 was the highest, up to 114.89, and no significant difference with sweet oat, but significantly higher than other oat varieties (P<0.05). The comprehensive analysis showed that GL381, Molasses and Sweet oat which were more suitable for planting in this area.

Key words: Northern Shanxi, Oat, Production performance, Feeding value

Table 1

Oat varieties and their origins in the experiment"

品种Variety 来源Origin
远杂一号Yuanza No.1 中国河北
张燕四号Zhangyan No.4 中国河北
GL381 中国河北
白燕2号Baiyan No.2 中国吉林
坝莜18号Bayou No.18 中国河北
甜燕麦Sweet oat 中国青海
草莜1号Caoyou No.1 中国内蒙古
牧乐思Molasses 加拿大
锋利Sharp 加拿大

Table 2

The comparison of fresh and hay yield of oat varieties kg/hm2"

品种
Variey		 孕穗期Booting stage 抽穗期Heading stage 开花期Flowering stage 乳熟期Milk ripening stage 完熟期Ripening stage
鲜草产量
Fresh yield		 干草产量
Hay yield		 鲜草产量
Fresh yield		 干草产量
Hay yield		 鲜草产量
Fresh yield		 干草产量
Hay yield		 鲜草产量
Fresh yield		 干草产量
Hay yield		 秸秆产量
Straw yield		 子粒产量
Grain yield
远杂一号
Yuanza No.1		 12 953.14b 2 144.56b 20 650.32b 4 562.28b 33 433.04b 7 499.24cd 27 505.24b 7 401.36b 8 135.73b 1 589.31c
张燕四号
Zhangyan No.4		 12 326.16b 2 251.35b 20 770.38b 4 802.40b 29 704.01c 7 738.20c 24 392.85c 7 779.03c 8 647.66a 2 536.08a
GL381 10 591.96b 1 946.39bc 20 050.02b 4 682.34b 26 817.40d 7 159.08d 23 941.79c 6 876.10c 7 390.36c 1 640.45c
白燕2号
Baiyan No.2		 13 406.70b 2 449.62b 16 328.16c 3 481.74c 25 858.59d 7 010.67d 24 380.85c 7 202.26c 8 020.12b 2 169.97b
坝莜18号
Bayou No.18		 12 472.90b 2 910.34ab 19 689.84bc 4 322.16bc 25 654.32d 6 378.85e 20 365.67d 5 763.54d 5 581.12d 2 573.51a
甜燕麦Sweet oat 8 057.36c 1 532.43c 18 009.00bc 4 082.04bc 21 755.87e 5 899.61f 18 335.83e 6 486.57e 5 492.19d 1 534.10c
草莜1号
Caoyou No.1		 14 140.40b 2 281.40 23 411.70a 4 922.46a 39 210.26a 9 385.85a 31 346.66a 7 956.64a 8 824.97a 1 044.60d
牧乐思Molasses 20 103.38a 4 031.97a 20 770.38b 3 961.98b 27 089.87cd 8 737.03b 22 358.51cd 6 730.86cd 8 799.40a 1 992.85ab
锋利Sharp 12 592.96b 2 435.68b 20 050.02b 4 682.34ab 27 608.63cd 7 507.75c 25 862.92bc 7 731.84bc 7 688.84c 1 345.12cd

Table 3

Agronomic characters of different oat varieties"

品种
Variety		 株高(cm)
Plant height		 穗长(cm)
Spike length		 穗铃数
Boll number per spike		 穗粒数
Grain number per spike		 穗粒重(g)
Grain weight per spike		 千粒重(g)
1000-grain weight
远杂一号Yuanza No.1 127.38a 20.61b 55.27b 621.00a 11.32c 27.39d
张燕四号Zhangyan No.4 105.14d 23.00ab 48.50b 390.08c 12.93c 39.51b
GL381 129.89a 17.02c 47.90b 429.64c 15.27b 30.35cd
白燕2号Baiyan No.2 120.49b 16.19cd 35.06d 235.52d 6.14d 25.99e
坝莜18号Bayou No.18 89.25e 16.56c 52.31b 513.36b 16.28a 20.44f
甜燕麦Sweet oat 113.48c 23.18a 74.70ab 503.24b 14.72bc 44.03a
草莜1号Caoyou No.1 116.33bc 24.56a 49.42cd 212.52d 5.93e 25.36e
牧乐思Molasses 90.10e 15.55d 84.64a 540.96b 17.16a 27.19d
锋利Sharp 104.40d 14.72e 58.28b 276.92d 6.67d 33.54c

Table 4

The performance of the feeding value of different oat varieties"

品种
Variety		 干物质(%)
Dry matter		 中性洗涤纤维(%)
Neutral detergent fiber		 酸性洗涤纤维(%)
Acid detergent fiber		 可消化干物质(%)
Digestible dry matter		 干物质采食量(%)
Dry matter intake		 饲料相对值
Relative feed value
远杂一号Yuanza No.1 92.02ab 58.83cd 28.36abcd 66.81abcd 2.04bcd 105.63b
张燕四号Zhangyan No.4 91.26b 62.69a 29.95abc 65.57bcd 1.91e 97.29de
GL381 92.91a 61.29abc 32.45a 63.62d 1.96cde 96.57e
白燕2号Baiyan No.2 92.24ab 55.91de 25.49d 69.05a 2.15ab 114.89a
坝莜18号Bayou No.18 91.41ab 59.17bcd 31.40ab 64.44cd 2.03bcd 101.31cde
甜燕麦Sweet oat 91.95ab 54.12e 30.14abc 65.42bcd 2.22a 112.45a
草莜1号Caoyou No.1 91.97ab 61.87ab 25.93d 68.70a 1.94de 103.29cd
牧乐思Molasses 91.46ab 57.32d 31.40ab 64.44cd 2.09b 104.57bc
锋利Sharp 91.63ab 58.70cd 29.50abc 65.92abc 2.04bcd 104.47bc

Table 5

The relational grade and the order of different oat varieties"

品种Variety 等权关联度
Grey correlative		 等权关联度排序
Order of grey correlative		 加权关联度
Weighted grey correlative		 加权关联度排序
Order of weighted grey correlative
远杂一号Yuanza No.1 0.858 6 0.858 6
张燕四号Zhangyan No.4 0.890 5 0.890 5
GL381 0.982 1 0.982 1
白燕2号Baiyan No.2 0.723 9 0.723 9
坝莜18号Bayou No.18 0.920 4 0.920 4
甜燕麦Sweet oat 0.931 3 0.931 3
草莜1号Caoyou No.1 0.813 7 0.813 7
牧乐思Molasses 0.979 2 0.979 2
锋利Sharp 0.789 8 0.789 8
[1] 李新一, 王加亭, 韩天虎 , 等. 我国饲草料生产形势及对策. 草业科学, 2015,32(12):2155-2166.
doi: 10.11829/j.issn.1001-0629.2015-0310
[2] 李向林, 沈禹颖, 万里强 . 种植业结构调整和草牧业发展潜力分析及政策建议. 中国工程科学, 2016,18(1):94-105.
doi: 10.15302/J-CESS-2016012
[3] 赵秀芳, 戎郁萍, 赵来喜 . 我国燕麦种质资源的收集和评价. 草业科学, 2007,24(3):36-40.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-0629.2007.03.008
[4] 崔海, 王加启, 卜登攀 , 等. 燕麦饲料在动物生产中的应用. 动物生产, 2010,37(6):214-216.
[5] 衣兰智, 李长忠, 刘洪庆 , 等. 不同苜蓿品种在青岛地区的适应性. 草业学报, 2011,20(2):147-155.
doi: 10.11686/cyxb20110218
[6] 郑敏娜, 李荫藩, 梁秀芝 , 等. 晋北地区引种苜蓿品种的灰色关联度分析与综合评价. 草地学报, 2017,22(3):631-637.
[7] Miller D A, Shrivastava J P, Jackobs J A . Alfalfa yield components in solid seedings. Crop Science, 1969,9(4):440-443.
doi: 10.2135/cropsci1969.0011183X000900040016x
[8] Griggs T . Alfalfa Variety Selection Guidelines. All Current Publications, 2004.
[9] 孙启忠, 王宗礼, 徐丽君 . 旱区苜蓿 . 北京:科学出版社, 2014: 116-180.
[10] 孙万斌, 马晖玲, 侯向阳 , 等. 20个紫花苜蓿品种在甘肃两个地区的生产性能及营养价值综合评价. 草业学报, 2017,26(3):161-174.
doi: 10.11686/cyxb2016141
[11] 孙建平, 董宽虎, 蒯晓妍 , 等. 晋北农牧交错区引进燕麦品种生产性能及饲用价值比较. 草业学报, 2017,26(11):222-230.
[12] 李海, 杨如达, 林凤仙 , 等. 不同行距对黍子农艺性状、经济性状及产量的影响. 作物杂志, 2017(1):68-72.
doi: 10.16035/j.issn.1001-7283.2017.01.013
[13] 康俊梅, 杨青川, 郭文山 , 等. 北京地区10个紫花苜蓿引进品种的生产性能研究. 中国草地学报, 2010,32(6):5-10.
[14] 吴娜, 卜洪震, 曾昭海 . 灌溉定额对夏播裸燕麦产量和品质的影响. 草业学报, 2010,19(5):204-209.
doi: 10.11686/cyxb20100527
[15] 张翔宇, 李海, 梁海燕 , 等. 不同种植行距与种植密度对黍子生长特性及子实产量的影响. 作物杂志, 2017(5):91-96.
doi: 10.16035/j.issn.1001-7283.2018.05.014
[16] 陈莉敏, 赵国敏, 廖英勇 , 等. 川西北7个燕麦品种产量及营养成分比较分析. 草业与畜牧, 2017(2):19-23.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-8403.2016.02.005
[1] Lifeng Dong,Xiaohu Lin,Chunrong Liu,Guishuang Hou,Chunlu Zhang,Jinfeng Fu,Fengbao Wang. Effects of Compound Seed Coating Agents on Pea Growth and Yield [J]. Crops, 2019, 35(2): 185-191.
[2] Weitang Li,Yang Li,Hailong Niu,Hongxin Liu,Shujing Mu,Zhongguo He,Yufa Li. Effects of Different Seed Coatings on Emergence Rate under the Mode of Single-Seed Precision Sowing [J]. Crops, 2019, 35(1): 191-196.
[3] Fu Luanhong,Yu Song,Yu Lihe,Xue Yingwen,Guo Wei. Analysis of Saline-Alkaline Tolerance and Screening of Identification Indexes of Different Oat Genotypes at the Germination Stage [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(6): 27-35.
[4] Peina Lu,Jinghui Liu,Baoping Zhao,Lijun Li,Xuefeng Lei,Fengyi Zhang. Effects of Microbial Fertilizer on Soil Characteristics and Root Exudates of Oats in Saline-alkali Land [J]. Crops, 2017, 33(5): 85-92.
[5] Juan Wang,Yinfan Li,Xiuzhi Liang,Minna Zheng. Morphological Diversity of Main Oat Germplasm Resources in Northern China [J]. Crops, 2017, 33(4): 27-32.
[6] Bin Zhang,Junyong Ge,Wanjun Yang,Xia Wang,Changye Tian,Yunxia Li,Wenbo Zuo,Min Xu. Effects of Nitrogen Topdressing at Jointing Stage on Yield and Profit of Main Varieties of Naked Oat (Avena nuda L.) [J]. Crops, 2017, 33(2): 81-87.
[7] Wencai Yang,Ba La,wei Wei. Effects of Combined Application of N and P Fertilizers on the Yield and Quality of Oat-Pea Mixture in Agricultural Areas of River Valleys in Tibet [J]. Crops, 2016, 32(5): 75-80.
[8] Youjun Chen,Qingping Zhou,Jian Sun,Lihua Tian. Comparison of Lodging Resistance among Different Oats (Avena sativa L.) [J]. Crops, 2016, 32(5): 44-49.
[9] Xingyan Guo,Danni Liang,Jian Lan. Research on Productive Performance and Nutritive Value of 11 Oat Varieties in Ningxia Irrigation Area [J]. Crops, 2016, 32(4): 105-111.
[10] Runlian Wang,Zhidong Zhang,Jinghui Liu,Huijun Liu,Baoping Zhao. Effects of No-Tillage with Stubble Mulch on Soil Nutrients, Soil Enzyme Activities and Oat Yield [J]. Crops, 2016, 32(3): 134-138.
[11] . [J]. Crops, 2013, 29(3): 127-131.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] Wenhui Huang, Hui Wang, Desheng Mei. Research Progress on Lodging Resistance of Crops[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 13 -19 .
[2] . [J]. Crops, 2008, 24(6): 111 -112 .
[3] Wenlian Bai,Yi Zheng,Jingxiu Xiao. Below-Ground Biotic Mechanisms of Phosphorus Uptake and Utilization Improved by Cereal and Legume Intercropping-A Review[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 20 -27 .
[4] Zhongguo He,Tongguo Zhu,Yufa Li,Baizhong Wang,Hailong Niu,Hongxin Liu,Weitang Li,Shujing Mu. Current Situation and Development Direction of Peanut Breeding in Jilin[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 8 -12 .
[5] . [J]. Crops, 2009, 25(6): 13 -17 .
[6] Fei Yang,Wenli Ma,Yongwei Chen,Zhansheng Zhang,Hao Wang. The Effects of Uniform Sowing and Drip Irrigation on the Spike Differentiation and Yield of Spring Wheat[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 84 -88 .
[7] . [J]. Crops, 1998, 14(S): 37 -44 .
[8] . [J]. Crops, 2011, 27(3): 50 .
[9] . [J]. Crops, 2003, 19(2): 43 -44 .
[10] Zhanning Gao,Hui Feng,Zhenggang Xue,Yongqian Yang,Shujie Wang,Zhengmao Pan. Analysis of Main Agronomic Traits of 28 Barley Varieties (Lines)[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(1): 77 -82 .