Crops ›› 2016, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (4): 105-111.doi: 10.16035/j.issn.1001-7283.2016.04.017

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Research on Productive Performance and Nutritive Value of 11 Oat Varieties in Ningxia Irrigation Area

Guo Xingyan,Liang Danni,Lan Jian   

  1. College of Agronomy, Ningxia University,Yinchuan 750021,Ningxia,China
  • Received:2016-04-27 Revised:2016-06-06 Online:2016-08-15 Published:2018-08-26
  • Contact: Jian Lan

RichHTML

3

PDF (PC)

109

Abstract:

In order to select high-quality oats cultivars suitable for the irrigation area of Ningxia and enrich forage grass resources in the region, 11 oat cultivars from abroad were grown in Pingji Fort area of Ningxia province. By comprehensive analysis of its production performance and the nutritional quality, the results showed that the 11 oat cultivars grew well in Ningxia region and the average growth period was about 90d. Hay yield and stem-leaf ratio were different.The Sweet yan No.1 and Local oat had higher forage yield, the Molasses had the smallest stem-leaf ratio and the palatability was best. Different oat cultivars of crude protein, crude fat, Ca, P, acid detergent fiber, neutral detergent fiber and so on were significant different(P<0.05), which Sweet yan No.1 had the highest content with crude protein and crude fat, Cayuse1 had the highest Ca content, Baler had the highest P content and Molasses had the lowest acid detergent fiber and neutral detergent fiber content. Grey correlation comprehensive analysis with 13 traits index of 11 oat cultivars showed, Molasses and Sweet yan No.1 had the excellent performance, they could be used as the breeding resources of oat cultivars and extension crops in the irrigation area of Ningxia.

Key words: Oat, Cultivars, Forage yield, Productive performance, Nutrition quality

Table 1

List of experimental materials"

品种Variety 来源Source 种子净度Seed pure(%) 原产地Origin area 千粒重1000-seedweight(g)
小马Cayuse1 北京猛犸种业有限公司 98 美国 30.57
塔娜Otana 北京正道生态科技有限公司 98 加拿大 27.25
牧马人Cayuse2 北京正道生态科技有限公司 98 加拿大 32.57
贝勒Baler 北京正道生态科技有限公司 98 加拿大 31.59
青牧Qingmu 北京正道生态科技有限公司 95 中国青海 33.25
锋利Sharp 北京正道生态科技有限公司 98 加拿大 32.38
牧乐思Molasses 北京正道生态科技有限公司 98 加拿大 40.82
甜燕1号Sweet yan No. 1 北京正道生态科技有限公司 98 加拿大 39.99
当地燕麦Local oat 宁夏固原 95 中国宁夏 29.05
加燕2号Jiayan No.2 北京正道生态科技有限公司 98 加拿大 26.25
大燕麦Big oat 北京正道生态科技有限公司 95 中国甘肃 20.96

Table 2

Growth period of different oat varieties"

品种Variety 出苗日期
Seedling stage		 拔节日期
Jointing stage		 孕穗日期
Booting stage		 抽穗日期
Heading stage		 成熟日期
Mature stage		 生育期(d)
Growth period
小马Cayuse1 6-10 7-01 7-18 7-22 8-25 86
塔娜Otana 6-09 6-30 7-17 7-21 8-22 84
牧马人Cayuse2 6-08 6-30 7-15 7-20 8-23 86
贝勒Baler 6-09 7-01 7-19 7-24 8-24 86
青牧Qingmu 6-07 6-28 7-19 7-23 8-25 89
锋利Sharp 6-08 6-29 7-21 7-28 8-26 89
牧乐思Molasses 6-08 6-29 7-25 8-04 9-12 106
甜燕1号Sweet yan No. 1 6-09 6-30 7-20 7-29 8-29 91
当地燕麦Local oat 6-10 6-30 7-20 7-27 8-28 89
加燕2号Jiayan No.2 6-11 7-01 7-21 7-26 8-25 87
大燕麦Big oat 6-10 7-01 7-21 7-28 8-27 88

Table 3

Plant height of 11 oat varieties in different growth periods cm"

品种Variety 出苗期
Seedling stage		 拔节期
Jointing stage		 孕穗期
Booting stage		 抽穗期
Heading stage		 开花期
Flowering stage		 灌浆期
Filling stage		 成熟期
Mature stage
小马Cayuse1 7.89±1.08d 40.27±4.58c 69.85±4.90e 82.63±3.88d 90.27±2.46f 86.70±1.93de 90.61±3.95g
塔娜Otana 13.56±0.67abc 49.00±5.54ab 80.68±2.80ab 92.53±3.05b 95.42±1.15de 93.07±4.63cd 97.66±2.17ef
牧马人Cayuse2 10.89±0.65c 45.27±5.45abc 72.28±2.76cde 86.45±3.25cd 92.43±1.21ef 88.63±2.55de 92.84±2.20fg
贝勒Baler 13.22±0.65abc 43.22±5.15bc 70.95±3.41de 85.02±2.70cd 92.82±1.94ef 85.40±0.83e 89.89±2.64g
青牧Qingmu 14.67±1.09a 52.75±5.28a 84.50±2.54a 102.58±2.42a 104.40±1.40a 101.50±4.60ab 104.50±3.09bcd
锋利Sharp 13.44±0.88abc 49.72±5.51ab 79.30±2.64abc 88.75±4.10bc 93.50±1.89ef 92.00±3.21cde 94.83±1.86efg
牧乐思Molasses 13.77±0.70ab 41.75±5.50bc 67.33±6.60e 87.95±3.53bcd 102.05±0.85bc 102.03±3.95ab 105.89±2.86abc
甜燕1号Sweet yan No. 1 13.56±0.60abc 45.87±6.29abc 72.95±5.01bcde 90.58±2.83bc 99.30±1.38cd 96.53±2.42bc 101.00±1.59cde
当地燕麦Local oat 14.78±0.70a 51.83±5.92a 85.32±4.04a 103.17±3.18a 109.58±2.32a 106.73±2.54a 109.06±2.71ab
加燕2号Jiayan No.2 14.44±1.23a 48.17±4.96abc 78.47±3.61abcd 92.48±1.83b 98.55±1.46cd 97.67±2.40bc 98.05±1.46def
大燕麦Big oat 11.22±0.95bc 42.30±4.95bc 73.97±2.79bcde 107.55±3.16a 109.68±3.27a 108.00±4.05a 111.33±0.92a
F值F value 5.46** 2.60** 5.68** 20.57** 17.79** 10.99** 12.24**

Table 4

Leaf-stem ratio and hay yield of different oat varieties at booting stage"

品种Variety 茎/叶(%)
Stem-leaf ratio		 干草产量(kg/hm2)
Hay yield
小马Cayuse1 0.70±0.16abcd 5 875.03±1.90bcd
塔娜Otana 1.03±0.20ab 6 463.36±2.82abc
牧马人Cayuse2 1.10±0.11a 5 466.70±2.62d
贝勒Baler 0.85±0.19abc 5 803.36±3.22cd
青牧Qingmu 0.78±0.22abcd 6 353.36±2.99abcd
锋利Sharp 0.55±0.11cd 5 728.36±3.68cd
牧乐思Molasses 0.32±0.04d 6 040.03±2.90abcd
甜燕1号Sweet yan No. 1 0.38±0.01d 6 858.36±4.63a
当地燕麦Local oat 0.60±0.11bcd 6 786.70±2.94ab
加燕2号Jiayan No.2 0.42±0.08cd 6 190.03±3.09abcd
大燕麦Big oat 0.41±0.05cd 6 220.03±3.30abcd
F值F Value 3.76** 2.36*

Table 5

Analysis of nutrient composition in different oat varieties %"

品种
Variety		 粗灰分
ASH		 钙
Ca		 磷
P		 粗蛋白
CP		 粗脂肪
EE		 酸性洗涤纤维
ADF		 中性洗涤纤维
NDF
小马Cayuse1 0.12±0.00b 0.50±0.01a 0.35±0.01bc 12.99±0.41abc 8.67±0.55abc 35.62±1.16a 57.22±0.77a
塔娜Otana 0.12±0.01b 0.47±0.02ab 0.37±0.01bc 11.58±0.51cde 7.23±0.64c 32.91±0.56abc 56.29±2.21a
牧马人Cayuse2 0.13±0.00ab 0.50±0.03a 0.33±0.01c 12.12±0.67bcde 8.70±0.67abc 35.59±0.66a 58.36±2.03a
贝勒Baler 0.13±0.00ab 0.42±0.01b 0.41±0.02a 10.71±0.49e 9.03±0.74ab 33.20±1.58abc 55.06±1.83ab
青牧Qingmu 0.13±0.00ab 0.42±0.01b 0.35±0.01bc 11.59±0.58cde 7.21±0.78c 34.76±1.67ab 56.37±1.17a
锋利Sharp 0.12±0.00b 0.49±0.02a 0.33±0.01c 12.77±0.25abcd 7.97±0.64bc 32.97±0.64abc 54.18±1.46abc
牧乐思Molasses 0.14±0.01a 0.47±0.02ab 0.39±0.01ab 11.77±0.95cde 8.46±0.37abc 31.24±1.09c 49.79±1.32c
甜燕1号Sweet yan No. 1 0.14±0.00a 0.47±0.02ab 0.33±0.01c 14.08±0.39a 9.60±0.75a 31.50±0.29bc 50.29±1.15bc
当地燕麦Local oat 0.14±0.00a 0.50±0.02a 0.33±0.02c 12.42±0.56bcd 9.10±0.58ab 36.29±1.25a 55.81±1.72a
加燕2号Jiayan No.2 0.13±0.01ab 0.45±0.02ab 0.36±0.01bc 11.24±0.55de 7.82±0.56bc 33.48±0.86abc 54.56±1.95abc
大燕麦Big oat 0.14±0.00a 0.47±0.02ab 0.38±0.01ab 13.64±0.25ab 8.33±0.68abc 34.07±0.53abc 53.87±0.46abc
F值F Value 2.21* 2.78** 3.89** 3.89** 2.73** 2.71* 2.79*

Fig.1

Comparation of RFV and RFQ of 11 oat varieties Different small letters in the same column show significant difference at 0.05 level"

Table 6

Grey correlative coefficient values of 11 oat varieties"

品种Variety ξ1(k) ξ2(k) ξ3(k) ξ4(k) ξ5(k) ξ6(k) ξ7(k) ξ8(k) ξ9(k) ξ10(k) ξ11(k) ξ12(k) ξ13(k)
小马Cayuse1 0.4144 0.5065 0.3501 0.4636 0.3333 1.0000 0.4000 0.6072 0.5624 0.3657 0.3658 0.3552 0.3551
塔娜Otana 0.6379 0.3545 0.5018 0.4708 0.3333 0.5714 0.5000 0.4026 0.3352 0.6019 0.3973 0.4162 0.4162
牧马人Cayuse2 0.3333 0.3333 0.3478 0.4532 0.5000 1.0000 0.3333 0.4623 0.5677 0.3673 0.3333 0.3333 0.3333
贝勒Baler 0.3974 0.4239 0.3333 0.6402 0.5000 0.3333 1.0000 0.3333 0.6771 0.5642 0.4485 0.4541 0.4541
青牧Qingmu 0.5795 0.4588 0.7771 0.5789 0.5000 0.3333 0.4000 0.4036 0.3333 0.4177 0.3944 0.3836 0.3836
锋利Sharp 0.3811 0.6290 0.5084 0.6269 0.3333 0.8000 0.3333 0.5626 0.4230 0.5934 0.4939 0.4894 0.4894
牧乐思Molasses 0.4595 1.0000 0.3461 1.0000 1.0000 0.6667 0.6667 0.4218 0.5118 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000 1.0000
甜燕1号Sweet yan No. 1 1.0000 0.8667 0.3902 0.3447 1.0000 0.5714 0.3333 1.0000 1.0000 0.9066 0.8955 0.8642 0.8638
当地燕麦Local oat 0.9066 0.5909 1.0000 0.3333 1.0000 1.0000 0.3333 0.5037 0.7050 0.3333 0.4158 0.3698 0.3698
加燕2号Jiayan No.2 0.5101 0.7959 0.6886 0.4532 0.5000 0.4444 0.4444 0.3724 0.4017 0.5299 0.4732 0.4578 0.4578
大燕麦Big oat 0.5215 0.8125 0.6733 0.4566 1.0000 0.5714 0.5714 0.7892 0.4848 0.4715 0.5123 0.4700 0.4701

Table 7

Grey correlative degree and order of 11 oat varieties"

品种Variety 等权关联分析
Equal-weighted correlation analysis		 综合评价
Comprehensive
assessment		 加权关联分析
Weighted correlation analysis		 综合评价
Comprehensive
assessment
等权关联度
EWCD		 等权排序
EWO		 加权关联度
WGCD		 加权排序
WO
小马Cayuse1 0.4676 8 中等 0.4485 10 差
塔娜Otana 0.4569 10 中等 0.4553 9 中等
牧马人Cayuse2 0.4383 11 差 0.4260 11 差
贝勒Baler 0.5046 6 中等 0.5399 5 中等
青牧Qingmu 0.4572 9 中等 0.4619 8 中等
锋利Sharp 0.5126 5 中等 0.4891 7 良
牧乐思Molasses 0.7748 1 优 0.7640 1 优
甜燕1号Sweet yan No. 1 0.7720 2 优 0.7320 2 优
当地燕麦Local oat 0.6047 3 良 0.6025 4 良
加燕2号Jiayan No.2 0.5023 7 中等 0.5010 6 中等
大燕麦Big oat 0.6004 4 良 0.6085 3 良
[1] 柴继宽, 赵桂琴, 胡凯军 , 等. 不同种植区生态环境对燕麦营养价值及干草产量的影响. 草地学报, 2010,18(3):421-425.
[2] 韩志林, 周青平, 颜红波 . 青海省燕麦良种繁育基地建设及种子生产. 青海畜牧兽医杂志, 2006,36(6):32-34.
[3] 杨胜 . 饲料分析及饲料质量监测技术.北京: 北京农业大学出版社, 1998: 36-61.
[4] 张吉鹍, 卢德勋, 刘建新 , 等. 粗饲料品质评定指数的研究现状及其进展. 草业科学, 2004,21(9):55-61.
[5] 邓聚龙 . 灰色控制系统.武汉: 华中理工大学出版杜, 1998.
[6] 邱宛华 . 管理决策与应用熵学.北京: 机械工业出版社, 2002: 193-196.
[7] 马春晖, 韩建国 . 高寒地区燕麦及其混播草地最佳刈割期的研究. 塔里木农垦大学学报, 2000,23(3):15-19.
[8] 武俊英, 刘景辉, 王怀栋 , 等.不同燕麦品种产量及其与构成因素的相关性研究.作物杂志,2011(5):36-40.
[9] 赵桂琴, 慕平, 魏黎明 . 饲用燕麦研究进展. 草业学报, 2007,16(4):116-125.
[10] 王桃, 徐长林, 张丽静 , 等. 5个燕麦品种和品系不同生育期不同部位养分分布格局. 草业学报, 2011,20(4):70-81.
doi: 10.11686/cyxb20110409
[11] Delany R H, Dobrenz A K . Morphological and anatomical features of alfalfa leaves as related to CO2 exchange. Crop Science, 1974,14(3):444-447.
doi: 10.2135/cropsci1974.0011183X001400030033x
[12] Fick G W, Onstad D W . Statistical model for predicting alfalfa herbage quality from morphological or weather data. Journal of Production Agriculture, 1988,1(2):160-166.
doi: 10.2134/jpa1988.0160
[13] 李春喜, 叶润荣, 周玉碧 , 等. 高寒牧区不同燕麦品种饲草产量及品质的研究. 草地学报, 2014,22(4):882-888.
doi: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2014.04.032
[14] 侯建杰, 赵桂琴, 焦婷 , 等. 6个燕麦品种(系)在甘肃夏河地区的适应性评价. 草原与草坪, 2013,33(2):26-32.
[15] 魏巍, 拉巴, 杨文才 , 等.氮、磷肥施对青引1号燕麦产量和品质的影响.作物杂志,2016(1):120-124.
[16] 刘刚, 赵桂琴, 魏黎明 . 基于熵权赋权法的灰色系统理论在燕麦品种综合评价中的应用. 中国草地学报, 2007,29(3):84-89.
[1] Peina Lu,Jinghui Liu,Baoping Zhao,Lijun Li,Xuefeng Lei,Fengyi Zhang. Effects of Microbial Fertilizer on Soil Characteristics and Root Exudates of Oats in Saline-alkali Land [J]. Crops, 2017, 33(5): 85-92.
[2] Yue Huang,Shuaibing Li,Ying Shi. Differences in Mineral Nutrition Qualityof Different Potato Varieties [J]. Crops, 2017, 33(4): 33-37.
[3] Juan Wang,Yinfan Li,Xiuzhi Liang,Minna Zheng. Morphological Diversity of Main Oat Germplasm Resources in Northern China [J]. Crops, 2017, 33(4): 27-32.
[4] Xiaodong Chen,Bin Zhao,Changhao Ji,Bin Zhu,Rui Wang. Differences in Forage Yield and Quality of Barley and Wheat with Proper Cutting Frequency [J]. Crops, 2017, 33(3): 81-84.
[5] Bin Zhang,Junyong Ge,Wanjun Yang,Xia Wang,Changye Tian,Yunxia Li,Wenbo Zuo,Min Xu. Effects of Nitrogen Topdressing at Jointing Stage on Yield and Profit of Main Varieties of Naked Oat (Avena nuda L.) [J]. Crops, 2017, 33(2): 81-87.
[6] Youjun Chen,Qingping Zhou,Jian Sun,Lihua Tian. Comparison of Lodging Resistance among Different Oats (Avena sativa L.) [J]. Crops, 2016, 32(5): 44-49.
[7] Wencai Yang,Ba La,wei Wei. Effects of Combined Application of N and P Fertilizers on the Yield and Quality of Oat-Pea Mixture in Agricultural Areas of River Valleys in Tibet [J]. Crops, 2016, 32(5): 75-80.
[8] Runlian Wang,Zhidong Zhang,Jinghui Liu,Huijun Liu,Baoping Zhao. Effects of No-Tillage with Stubble Mulch on Soil Nutrients, Soil Enzyme Activities and Oat Yield [J]. Crops, 2016, 32(3): 134-138.
[9] . [J]. Crops, 2013, 29(3): 49-52.
[10] . [J]. Crops, 2013, 29(3): 127-131.
[11] Zhong Kui, Tong Litao, Liu Liya, Zeng Zhihong, Zhou Sumei. Starch Quality and Pasting Property Analysis of Different Mung Bean Cultivars [J]. Crops, 2013, 29(2): 134-138.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] Guangcai Zhao,Xuhong Chang,Demei Wang,Zhiqiang Tao,Yanjie Wang,Yushuang Yang,Yingjie Zhu. General Situation and Development of Wheat Production[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 1 -7 .
[2] Baoquan Quan,Dongmei Bai,Yuexia Tian,Yunyun Xue. Effects of Different Leaf-Peg Ratio on Photosynthesis and Yield of Peanut[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 102 -105 .
[3] Xuefang Huang,Mingjing Huang,Huatao Liu,Cong Zhao,Juanling Wang. Effects of Annual Precipitation and Population Density on Tiller-Earing and Yield of Zhangzagu 5 under Film Mulching and Hole Sowing[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 106 -113 .
[4] Wenhui Huang, Hui Wang, Desheng Mei. Research Progress on Lodging Resistance of Crops[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 13 -19 .
[5] Yun Zhao,Cailong Xu,Xu Yang,Suzhen Li,Jing Zhou,Jicun Li,Tianfu Han,Cunxiang Wu. Effects of Sowing Methods on Seedling Stand and Production Profit of Summer Soybean under Wheat-Soybean System[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 114 -120 .
[6] Mei Lu,Min Sun,Aixia Ren,Miaomiao Lei,Lingzhu Xue,Zhiqiang Gao. Effects of Spraying Foliar Fertilizers on Dryland Wheat Growth and the Correlation with Yield Formation[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 121 -125 .
[7] Xiaofei Wang,Haijun Xu,Mengqiao Guo,Yu Xiao,Xinyu Cheng,Shuxia Liu,Xiangjun Guan,Yaokun Wu,Weihua Zhao,Guojiang Wei. Effects of Sowing Date, Density and Fertilizer Utilization Rate on the Yield of Oilseed Perilla frutescens in Cold Area[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 126 -130 .
[8] Pengjin Zhu,Xinhua Pang,Chun Liang,Qinliang Tan,Lin Yan,Quanguang Zhou,Kewei Ou. Effects of Cold Stress on Reactive Oxygen Metabolism and Antioxidant Enzyme Activities of Sugarcane Seedlings[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 131 -137 .
[9] Jie Gao,Qingfeng Li,Qiu Peng,Xiaoyan Jiao,Jinsong Wang. Effects of Different Nutrient Combinations on Plant Production and Nitrogen, Phosphorus and Potassium Utilization Characteristics in Waxy Sorghum[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 138 -142 .
[10] Na Shang,Zhongxu Yang,Qiuzhi Li,Huihui Yin,Shihong Wang,Haitao Li,Tong Li,Han Zhang. Response of Cotton with Vegetative Branches to Plant Density in the Western of Shandong Province[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 143 -148 .