高粱育种资源耐瘠性鉴定及评价

doi:10.16035/j.issn.1001-7283.2020.06.005

Abstract

Abstract:

The barren stress was carried out on sorghum breeding resources during the whole growth period to explore its influence on main agronomic traits and yield of sorghum. Sorghum resources were selected to determine the barren tolerance of different sorghum resources. At the same time, the system for evaluation of barren tolerance of sorghum was established to provide support for selection and breeding of 56 sorghum varieties of barren tolerance. The experiment was carried out from April to October in 2016, 2017 and 2018. A completely random design was adopted, two treatments of normal and barren stress were set up, also barren tolerance coefficient and membership functionare used in combination, to comprehensively evaluate the barren tolerance of sorghum. It was observed that compared with the normal treatment, sorghum materials under barren stress showed longer growth period, higher plant height, thinner stem diameter, shorter panicle length, narrower panicle width, and less weight of grains per panicle and 1000-grain weight. The variation coefficient between the barren stress and normal treatment of variable agronomic traits of sorghum materials was 0.10-0.46, among which the trait variation of grain weight per panicle was the largest. With the combination of barren tolerance coefficient and membership function adopted for evaluation, it showed that the mean membership function value of 56 sorghum materials was within a range of 0.23-0.79. Materials with strong barren tolerance such as BTx378, BSX44 and A2 E.M. BTx623-5B were identified and selected.

Key words: Sorghum, Barren tolerance, Barren tolerance coefficient, Membership function

Wang Rui, Ping Jun′ai, Zhang Fuyao, Zhan Pengjie, Chu Jianqiang. Identification and Evaluation of Sorghum Breeding Resources for Barren Tolerance[J].Crops, 2020, 36(6): 30-37.

Figures/Tables 8

Table 1

Table 2

Table 3

Table 4

Effects of barren stress on plant height and stem diameter, panicle length and panicle wide of sorghum resources cm"

编号 No.	株高Plant height			茎粗Stem diameter			穗长Panicle length			穗宽Panicle width
编号 No.	对照CK	瘠薄Barren	X	对照CK	瘠薄Barren	X	对照CK	瘠薄Barren	X	对照CK	瘠薄Barren	X
1	120.83±8.29	128.33±5.44	1.06	1.82±0.52	1.38±0.37	0.76	27.33±1.55	24.00±1.47	0.88	7.42±1.16	5.75±0.74	0.78
2	120.67±9.46	105.33±6.85	0.87	2.17±1.06	1.37±0.61	0.63	30.00±0.82	26.00±2.45	0.87	10.33±3.4	5.83±0.85^**	0.56
3	148.67±4.19	164.00±10.68	1.10	1.60±0.25	1.05±0.12	0.66	21.67±3.30	18.33±4.78	0.85	6.33±1.25	5.50±1.08	0.87
4	93.00±2.83	92.67±8.73	1.00	1.63±0.82	1.13±0.61	0.69	22.33±3.09	22.00±0.82	0.99	7.67±1.25	6.00±1.41	0.78
5	125.33±4.99	124.67±4.99	0.99	1.27±0.66	1.03±0.58	0.82	26.83±2.59	26.33±4.50	0.98	7.33±2.62	6.00±1.41	0.82
6	106.33±3.86	106.67±3.09	1.00	1.43±0.47	1.13±0.50	0.79	21.33±4.50	22.33±5.91	1.05	6.67±1.70	6.00±1.41	0.90
7	131.00±4.55	131.67±7.93	1.01	1.70±0.45	1.13±0.45	0.67	30.67±3.09	26.33±4.78	0.86	7.67±0.47	5.50±1.08	0.72
8	116.33±4.50	110.33±4.50	0.95	1.65±0.39	1.15±0.63	0.70	28.33±0.47	26.33±3.09	0.93	9.00±2.83	6.83±1.55	0.76
9	130.33±7.32	125.00±5.72	0.96	1.75±0.82	0.98±0.30	0.56	34.17±1.84	24.00±2.94^*	0.70	7.40±0.85	5.00±0.82	0.68
10	123.67±6.60	118.00±6.68	0.95	1.23±0.39	0.93±0.21	0.76	21.67±2.05	18.00±2.16	0.83	6.00±0.82	4.73±1.64	0.79
11	123.33±1.25	127.00±2.45	1.03	1.40±0.42	1.17±0.33	0.83	21.00±1.41	20.67±1.89	0.98	6.50±0.41	6.00±0.71	0.92
12	131.67±1.70	137.33±2.49	1.04	1.50±0.37	1.28±0.57	0.86	28.33±6.18	27.33±2.49	0.96	8.00±2.16	6.33±0.94	0.79
13	109.67±4.11	107.67±2.05	0.98	1.73±0.99	1.30±0.65	0.75	27.33±2.49	23.67±2.62	0.87	9.17±2.01	5.50±0.71^*	0.60
14	102.00±10.23	107.00±6.16	1.05	1.48±0.87	1.18±0.69	0.80	23.67±2.05	20.33±1.25	0.86	7.50±2.48	5.83±1.03	0.78
15	108.00±6.16	101.50±9.90	0.94	1.41±0.49	1.15±0.60	0.82	23.67±0.47	22.17±0.62	0.94	7.58±0.92	5.83±0.62	0.77
16	105.67±8.22	113.33±5.31	1.07	1.53±0.25	1.17±0.41	0.77	22.33±3.30	22.67±1.25	1.01	7.50±0.71	5.17±0.85	0.69
17	119.00±6.38	126.33±1.25	1.06	1.65±0.86	1.10±0.43	0.67	20.33±2.05	22.33±4.19	1.10	6.83±1.03	5.17±0.85	0.76
18	113.67±7.59	118.33±6.24	1.04	1.80±1.03	1.27±0.82	0.70	26.33±2.05	24.00±2.16	0.91	8.83±1.55	5.67±0.47^*	0.64
19	111.33±13.82	109.83±7.33	0.99	1.37±0.48	1.08±0.40	0.79	24.67±3.77	21.17±0.62	0.86	8.00±1.41	5.42±0.42	0.68
20	104.33±6.02	109.00±4.32	1.04	1.42±0.70	0.93±0.43	0.66	24.00±1.41	19.33±2.87	0.81	6.67±0.47	5.83±1.03	0.88
21	126.33±6.94	116.33±8.38	0.92	1.52±0.39	1.17±0.21	0.77	21.33±2.62	18.00±2.83	0.84	7.33±2.05	5.33±0.47	0.73
22	126.67±5.91	132.67±5.25	1.05	1.88±0.67	1.18±0.38	0.63	27.00±2.16	23.50±1.78	0.87	9.00±2.16	6.00±0.82^*	0.67
23	143.67±12.71	146.00±4.97	1.02	1.93±0.38	1.20±0.43	0.62	28.33±1.70	24.67±2.36	0.87	8.17±0.85	4.67±0.47^*	0.57
24	138.00±15.64	145.00±0.82	1.05	1.78±0.45	1.27±0.29	0.71	28.33±2.36	21.33±2.05^*	0.75	9.00±2.16	5.17±0.24^*	0.57
25	130.33±10.50	124.33±4.03	0.95	1.97±0.68	0.98±0.52	0.50	26.33±1.89	22.33±3.40	0.85	10.83±3.66	5.00±0.82^**	0.46
26	156.00±20.22	158.33±2.87	1.01	1.42±0.45	1.15±0.20	0.81	21.17±5.17	15.00±2.45^*	0.71	7.17±1.43	4.67±0.47	0.65
27	115.00±15.58	125.00±7.12	1.09	1.85±0.46	1.53±0.42	0.83	21.33±2.87	20.67±1.70	0.97	10.00±0.82	8.67±1.70	0.87
28	112.00±7.79	124.67±4.11	1.11	1.62±0.21	1.17±0.34	0.72	22.00±2.16	19.33±2.87	0.88	8.17±1.43	5.67±1.03	0.69
29	97.67±12.92	97.33±11.59	1.00	2.00±0.36	1.73±0.31	0.87	24.00±0.82	21.67±1.25	0.90	10.00±0.82	8.17±0.62	0.82
30	136.83±3.47	128.17±7.03	0.94	1.90±0.51	1.12±0.22	0.59	25.17±0.24	19.00±2.16^*	0.75	9.50±1.47	6.75±0.35	0.71
编号 No.	株高Plant height			茎粗Stem diameter			穗长Panicle length			穗宽Panicle width
编号 No.	对照CK	瘠薄Barren	X	对照CK	瘠薄Barren	X	对照CK	瘠薄Barren	X	对照CK	瘠薄Barren	X
31	128.67±8.06	135.00±3.56	1.05	2.15±0.59	1.23±0.34	0.57	22.67±1.25	22.33±1.25	0.99	8.67±1.70	7.33±0.47	0.85
32	138.67±4.92	157.33±11.09	1.13	2.07±0.87	1.28±0.44	0.62	22.33±1.70	21.00±2.16	0.94	11.83±2.32	7.33±1.70^**	0.62
33	162.00±23.51	166.00±17.38	1.02	1.75±0.40	1.02±0.33	0.58	25.00±1.63	21.67±4.99	0.87	10.00±1.63	6.00±0.82^**	0.60
34	137.33±9.84	145.00±0.00	1.06	1.90±0.29	1.38±0.44	0.73	24.00±1.41	24.33±4.19	1.01	10.00±0.82	8.33±2.05	0.83
35	135.67±9.81	158.33±13.12^*	1.17	2.27±0.78	1.25±0.39	0.55	27.33±2.05	20.67±1.70^*	0.76	10.17±1.93	7.50±1.47	0.74
36	132.67±5.56	171.67±6.55^*	1.29	1.83±0.29	1.30±0.57	0.71	21.67±2.62	20.33±3.68	0.94	12.00±1.41	7.67±1.89^**	0.64
37	149.33±23.68	165.00±15.58	1.10	1.97±0.50	1.60±0.52	0.81	22.33±1.89	20.33±2.05	0.91	9.17±2.01	6.17±1.31^*	0.67
38	142.33±2.05	154.00±14.85	1.08	1.38±0.29	1.13±0.44	0.82	21.00±1.41	20.67±3.86	0.98	7.83±0.24	6.67±1.25	0.85
39	160.00±19.82	167.67±17.91	1.05	1.70±0.51	1.12±0.33	0.66	26.33±0.94	21.33±2.05	0.81	10.00±0.82	7.00±0.41^*	0.70
40	142.33±6.55	164.67±7.85^*	1.16	1.90±0.51	1.27±0.39	0.67	25.00±0.82	22.00±4.90	0.88	9.50±1.47	6.50±1.08^*	0.68
41	123.33±15.86	139.17±7.98	1.13	1.98±0.66	1.25±0.48	0.63	25.00±2.45	21.33±1.93	0.85	10.17±2.78	6.83±2.25^*	0.67
42	149.67±9.03	158.67±12.71	1.06	1.67±0.39	1.27±0.29	0.76	20.33±3.09	18.67±0.94	0.92	8.50±1.08	7.00±0.82	0.82
43	188.33±33.49	182.33±26.71	0.97	1.60±0.41	1.45±0.53	0.91	21.33±4.03	19.33±0.94	0.91	7.33±0.47	5.83±0.24	0.80
44	139.00±15.30	142.33±9.10	1.02	2.63±0.25	1.45±0.33^*	0.55	26.00±1.41	24.33±0.94	0.94	12.17±2.25	8.00±0.00^**	0.66
45	139.33±9.98	144.00±5.35	1.03	1.50±0.23	1.20±0.23	0.80	26.00±0.82	24.00±1.63	0.92	10.33±0.94	7.67±0.47	0.74
46	124.00±6.98	139.00±11.34	1.12	1.30±0.28	0.98±0.13	0.76	23.67±3.86	21.67±1.25	0.92	9.33±3.40	5.83±0.85^*	0.63
47	153.67±6.34	157.00±4.24	1.02	1.77±0.33	1.20±0.24	0.68	20.00±1.63	16.67±1.25	0.83	9.17±2.78	6.33±1.25	0.69
48	125.33±6.94	112.00±10.61	0.89	1.80±0.41	1.15±0.41	0.64	21.33±1.25	17.00±0.82^*	0.80	8.33±0.47	6.00±0.82	0.72
49	174.33±18.80	189.33±13.52	1.09	1.62±0.49	1.03±0.39	0.64	23.00±1.63	22.33±1.25	0.97	10.33±3.68	6.00±1.41^*	0.58
50	96.67±3.09	103.00±2.83	1.07	1.73±1.01	1.42±0.66	0.82	30.67±2.05	27.33±4.03	0.89	8.00±2.16	6.33±2.62	0.79
51	106.33±6.34	112.00±2.45	1.05	1.40±0.50	1.32±0.30	0.94	25.67±0.47	25.67±1.25	1.00	8.33±1.25	5.67±0.47	0.68
52	119.00±16.75	130.00±6.38	1.09	1.60±0.43	1.07±0.26	0.67	25.00±2.94	23.67±1.25	0.95	7.33±1.70	5.67±0.47	0.77
53	112.67±9.46	116.33±3.86	1.03	1.45±0.76	1.23±0.70	0.85	27.00±2.16	23.00±1.63	0.85	7.67±1.31	6.50±0.71	0.85
54	86.00±12.33	95.33±8.65	1.11	1.48±0.67	0.93±0.41	0.63	21.67±1.70	20.33±1.89	0.94	8.83±3.12	7.17±0.62	0.81
55	103.00±2.16	88.67±12.12	0.86	1.80±1.13	1.18±0.44	0.66	17.67±0.47	15.33±0.94	0.87	7.83±1.55	5.83±0.62	0.74
56	105.83±2.39	109.17±4.03	1.03	1.09±0.60	0.91±0.45	0.84	26.83±1.89	22.67±1.18	0.84	6.00±1.78	4.83±1.03	0.81

Table 4

Table 5

Effects of barren stress on grain weight per panicle and 1000-grain weight of sorghum resources g"

编号 No.	穗粒重Grain weight per panicle			千粒重1000-grain weight			编号 No.	穗粒重Grain weight per panicle			千粒重1000-grain weight
编号 No.	对照CK	瘠薄Barren	X	对照CK	瘠薄Barren	X	编号 No.	对照CK	瘠薄Barren	X	对照CK	瘠薄Barren	X
1	56.50±3.07	30.43±10.95^*	0.54	28.99±2.05	22.95±2.99^*	0.79	22	46.06±3.52	20.81±4.34	0.45	30.37±3.42	29.81±2.22	0.98
2	60.89±10.98	39.74±5.00	0.65	27.25±0.54	23.31±2.73	0.86	23	49.76±7.85	30.22±6.29	0.61	19.66±1.56	18.24±0.97	0.93
3	40.97±5.85	26.20±0.31	0.64	24.26±2.80	23.46±2.12	0.97	24	37.51±4.21	19.49±3.03	0.52	30.64±4.66	25.51±4.35	0.83
4	29.86±3.23	27.95±3.84	0.94	23.91±2.38	22.16±1.49	0.93	25	48.38±14.82	19.14±4.26^*	0.40	21.19±2.77	20.19±2.06	0.95
5	35.35±11.30	30.42±5.21	0.86	23.88±1.54	21.11±1.96	0.88	26	54.68±13.70	18.06±3.62^**	0.33	32.67±2.75	29.60±2.71	0.91
6	38.60±11.51	25.29±4.34	0.66	26.07±3.86	23.53±2.50	0.90	27	79.48±11.90	39.97±7.20^**	0.50	29.32±4.81	30.98±2.55	1.06
7	45.10±16.15	26.87±6.74	0.60	23.67±3.93	25.30±1.90	1.07	28	53.40±25.15	27.94±4.28	0.52	36.42±3.06	31.62±4.96	0.87
8	55.59±22.69	27.61±3.49^*	0.50	30.55±2.49	27.85±2.71	0.91	29	55.96±19.44	34.49±10.89	0.62	36.85±2.74	34.07±2.39	0.92
9	63.31±11.49	24.65±4.90^**	0.39	26.69±1.40	24.41±1.48	0.91	30	74.34±17.25	30.20±8.07^**	0.41	32.76±3.56	25.69±3.45^*	0.78
10	32.66±6.87	21.81±6.42	0.67	21.86±3.15	24.93±2.24	1.14	31	69.73±14.29	30.10±5.53^**	0.43	26.37±1.04	24.54±3.18	0.93
11	37.76±8.27	28.88±3.79	0.76	25.44±3.79	28.02±2.72	1.10	32	88.38±13.26	29.69±9.22^**	0.34	29.87±3.84	25.79±1.92	0.86
12	40.08±10.40	28.68±5.14	0.72	24.72±4.16	25.32±2.52	1.02	33	68.32±22.62	26.05±9.40^**	0.38	30.57±2.83	27.93±1.44	0.91
13	35.57±4.32	25.65±11.61	0.72	19.29±1.36	20.77±1.09	1.08	34	64.73±25.95	33.10±6.20^*	0.51	28.29±0.95	26.49±2.12	0.94
14	37.91±8.45	20.66±4.98	0.54	27.08±1.72	27.53±0.70	1.02	35	78.32±13.90	29.99±10.03^**	0.38	33.45±2.08	26.19±2.97^**	0.78
15	25.01±6.95	17.81±5.08	0.71	27.06±5.99	26.82±2.88	0.99	36	52.81±15.76	33.85±9.11	0.64	31.30±4.90	30.11±2.84	0.96
16	41.17±3.59	21.86±4.10	0.53	25.27±3.53	22.16±2.29	0.88	37	44.28±13.77	32.93±12.2	0.74	33.20±3.23	30.35±2.13	0.91
17	47.62±16.88	25.54±5.48	0.54	26.26±1.24	26.09±2.55	0.99	38	55.63±20.84	28.29±8.56^*	0.51	29.54±2.20	27.52±3.23	0.93
18	37.93±7.48	23.03±3.99	0.61	22.91±3.91	27.83±1.89	1.21	39	75.13±25.53	28.67±14.27^**	0.38	30.17±0.71	25.79±2.59	0.85
19	31.59±12.24	18.15±9.33	0.57	29.74±3.57	28.98±3.73	0.97	40	70.44±16.86	28.93±9.10^**	0.41	30.79±1.82	28.33±1.64	0.92
20	28.97±4.94	22.51±9.63	0.78	26.25±1.89	24.91±1.20	0.95	41	69.09±29.17	23.98±4.93^**	0.35	29.25±0.45	24.36±0.99	0.83
21	38.31±4.37	23.61±2.76	0.62	26.30±3.10	25.08±2.67	0.95	42	69.55±38.74	32.73±9.01^**	0.47	30.65±2.59	26.91±2.39	0.88
编号 No.	穗粒重Grain weight per panicle			千粒重1000-grain weight			编号 No.	穗粒重Grain weight per panicle			千粒重1000-grain weight
编号 No.	对照CK	瘠薄Barren	X	对照CK	瘠薄Barren	X	编号 No.	对照CK	瘠薄Barren	X	对照CK	瘠薄Barren	X
43	39.24±8.53	19.39±4.90	0.49	18.52±1.51	15.07±0.65	0.81	50	63.57±21.64	28.80±1.16^*	0.45	33.52±3.58	25.97±2.59^**	0.77
44	85.84±38.82	33.75±14.74^**	0.39	22.34±1.15	21.98±1.60	0.98	51	53.02±9.15	24.74±5.90^*	0.47	27.27±1.33	20.84±1.66^*	0.76
45	78.24±30.49	31.79±1.98^**	0.41	29.44±4.86	28.07±0.54	0.95	52	33.13±5.69	21.03±7.11	0.63	25.70±3.52	27.17±1.72	1.06
46	27.78±4.14	22.94±4.76	0.83	29.61±2.22	26.73±2.78	0.90	53	46.54±2.06	32.48±21.05	0.70	28.21±1.08	25.01±1.39	0.89
47	55.19±26.15	30.08±4.21	0.54	29.09±5.59	25.83±1.96	0.89	54	45.46±19.28	25.40±5.96	0.56	24.61±1.66	19.87±2.46	0.81
48	49.85±22.30	19.78±2.92^*	0.40	26.14±0.80	24.44±3.40	0.93	55	24.33±6.99	13.70±5.68	0.56	23.35±0.65	22.91±2.24	0.98
49	69.56±26.85	27.49±11.99^**	0.40	28.63±4.13	24.01±0.15	0.84	56	20.44±8.37	13.85±1.30	0.68	20.51±1.97	19.46±1.86	0.95

Table 5

Table 6

Table 7

Table 8

Subordinate function u(x), U value of agronomic traits of sorghum resources under barren stress"

编号 No.	材料名称 Name	出苗-开花天数 Days of seedling- flowering	株高 Plant height	茎粗 Stem diameter	穗长 Panicle length	穗宽 Panicle width	穗粒重 Grain weight per panicle	千粒重 1000-grain weight	U值 U value	等级 Grade
11	BTx378	0.97	0.61	0.76	0.71	1.00	0.71	0.76	0.79	1
6	BSX44	1.00	0.67	0.66	0.87	0.96	0.53	0.32	0.71	1
5	A2早BTx623-5B	0.94	0.69	0.72	0.70	0.78	0.87	0.28	0.71	1
4	A2早BTx623-11B	0.95	0.68	0.44	0.71	0.70	1.00	0.37	0.69	2
27	0-01	0.86	0.47	0.75	0.67	0.88	0.28	0.66	0.65	2
29	103R	0.90	0.68	0.83	0.51	0.78	0.47	0.37	0.65	2
15	B35	0.52	0.81	0.72	0.59	0.67	0.63	0.51	0.64	2
12	BTx623	0.42	0.57	0.81	0.66	0.72	0.63	0.59	0.63	2
10	BTx3197	0.50	0.78	0.58	0.33	0.71	0.55	0.85	0.62	2
17	B232E	0.78	0.53	0.38	1.00	0.64	0.34	0.52	0.60	2
21	BV4	0.85	0.86	0.61	0.36	0.58	0.47	0.43	0.59	3
38	R111	0.64	0.48	0.73	0.71	0.85	0.29	0.38	0.58	3
55	Sc240-14E	0.79	1.00	0.36	0.42	0.62	0.38	0.49	0.58	3
13	BTx623 bmr6	0.69	0.72	0.57	0.41	0.30	0.64	0.70	0.58	3
52	741324	0.62	0.46	0.38	0.62	0.68	0.50	0.66	0.56	3
37	晋辐1号	0.75	0.43	0.71	0.53	0.46	0.68	0.34	0.56	3
42	363C/2691	0.86	0.53	0.59	0.55	0.79	0.23	0.26	0.54	3
20	Tx432	0.53	0.57	0.36	0.26	0.90	0.73	0.42	0.54	3
34	T12S3A-1/L92899-R473-2	0.40	0.54	0.52	0.78	0.81	0.30	0.39	0.54	3
16	TAM428	0.74	0.51	0.60	0.79	0.50	0.33	0.26	0.53	3
8	L9198/TMS	0.60	0.79	0.45	0.57	0.65	0.27	0.34	0.53	3
51	吉7030-4	0.65	0.55	1.00	0.75	0.48	0.22	0.00	0.52	3
53	961547	0.12	0.60	0.80	0.38	0.84	0.60	0.28	0.52	3
3	BE35/糖	0.61	0.43	0.36	0.37	0.89	0.51	0.46	0.52	3
19	黑Tx430	0.50	0.71	0.67	0.40	0.47	0.40	0.48	0.52	3
43	Sug中秆	0.26	0.75	0.92	0.52	0.73	0.27	0.12	0.51	3
56	R9188	0.04	0.60	0.77	0.36	0.75	0.57	0.42	0.50	3
46	1877/J7654	0.50	0.39	0.58	0.54	0.36	0.81	0.32	0.50	3
50	L黑-4/吉7031-2	0.81	0.52	0.72	0.48	0.72	0.20	0.03	0.50	3
18	BTx7000	0.05	0.58	0.46	0.53	0.39	0.45	1.00	0.50	3
14	Tx7078	0.22	0.56	0.68	0.40	0.69	0.35	0.57	0.50	3
48	0-30	0.86	0.92	0.32	0.24	0.57	0.11	0.39	0.49	4
31	16R	0.56	0.56	0.17	0.71	0.84	0.17	0.38	0.48	4
45	34-33-2	0.27	0.60	0.68	0.56	0.61	0.13	0.43	0.47	4
47	A3R0-30/0-30黑三	0.67	0.62	0.41	0.33	0.50	0.35	0.28	0.45	4
7	B6-6	0.00	0.66	0.38	0.40	0.56	0.44	0.69	0.45	4
28	038R	0.68	0.41	0.50	0.45	0.51	0.32	0.24	0.44	4
54	Sc499-14E	0.54	0.42	0.29	0.60	0.76	0.38	0.10	0.44	4
22	Ho275	0.67	0.56	0.29	0.43	0.45	0.20	0.49	0.44	4
1	B2 7050	0.42	0.53	0.58	0.45	0.69	0.34	0.07	0.44	4
2	B泸45	0.36	0.97	0.30	0.42	0.23	0.53	0.21	0.43	4
44	HC356	0.65	0.62	0.12	0.59	0.43	0.10	0.50	0.43	4
23	Ho277	0.55	0.64	0.27	0.43	0.24	0.45	0.37	0.42	4
36	三尺三	0.53	0.00	0.48	0.60	0.39	0.51	0.45	0.42	4
40	1383-2	0.70	0.31	0.38	0.45	0.49	0.13	0.36	0.40	4
30	035R	0.86	0.82	0.20	0.14	0.54	0.12	0.05	0.39	5
49	53H	0.71	0.47	0.32	0.68	0.26	0.11	0.18	0.39	5
39	晋粱5号	0.54	0.56	0.36	0.28	0.52	0.08	0.21	0.36	5
24	Ho447	0.64	0.56	0.48	0.13	0.25	0.31	0.16	0.36	5
32	L2381-1	0.66	0.36	0.27	0.60	0.35	0.01	0.23	0.35	5
编号 No.	材料名称 Name	出苗-开花天数 Days of seedling- flowering	株高 Plant height	茎粗 Stem diameter	穗长 Panicle length	穗宽 Panicle width	穗粒重 Grain weight per panicle	千粒重 1000-grain weight	U值 U value	等级 Grade
26	E35-1	0.27	0.64	0.71	0.02	0.42	0.00	0.32	0.34	5
33	TC1383-2-1	0.42	0.62	0.18	0.42	0.30	0.08	0.34	0.34	5
41	SX-30	0.51	0.38	0.30	0.38	0.46	0.03	0.16	0.32	5
9	冀蚜2号	0.18	0.77	0.14	0.00	0.47	0.10	0.34	0.29	5
25	Ho260	0.29	0.78	0.00	0.37	0.00	0.11	0.43	0.28	5
35	L220	0.33	0.29	0.12	0.14	0.60	0.09	0.05	0.23	5

Table 8

References 26

[1]	邹剑秋, 朱凯, 张志鹏, 等. 国内外高粱深加工研究现状与发展前景. 杂粮作物, 2002,22(5):296-298.
[2]	吕富堂, 韩爱清, 杜秀兰, 等. 建国以来中国高粱发展历程及发展趋势. 山西农业科学, 2002,30(3):20-24.
[3]	白文斌, 张福跃, 焦晓燕, 等. 中国高粱产业工程技术研究的定位思考. 中国农学通报, 2013,29(11):107-110.
[4]	米国华. 论作物养分效率及其遗传改良. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2017,23(6):1525-1535.
[5]	凌宏清, 袁力行. 我国作物养分高效研究的现状与未来发展趋势. 中国基础科学·植物科学专刊, 2016,18(2):54-60.
[6]	Belay A, Gebrekidan H, Uloro Y, et al. Effect of crop residues on grain yield response of sorghum (Sorghum bicolor) (L.) to application of N and P fertilizer. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems, 1997,48:191-196.
[7]	Chen X C, Chen F J, Chen Y L, et al. Modern maize hybrids in Northeast China exhibit increased yield potential and resource use efficiency despite the adverse climate change. Global Change Biology, 2013,19(3):923-936. pmid: 23504848
[8]	Wang X R, Wang Y X, Tian J, et al. Overexpressing AtPAP15 enhances phosphorus efficiency in soybean. Plant Physiology 2009,151(1):233-240. pmid: 19587103
[9]	Fox T, DeBruin J, Collet K H, et al. A single point mutation in Ms44 results in dominant male sterility and improves nitrogen use efficiency in maize. Plant Biotechnology Journal, 2017,15(8):942-952. doi: 10.1111/pbi.12689 pmid: 28055137
[10]	Ciampitti I A, Vara P P V. Historical synthesis-analysis of changes in grain nitrogen dynamics in sorghum. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2016,7:275. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2016.00275 pmid: 27014299
[11]	刘鹏, 武爱莲, 王劲松, 等. 不同基因型高粱的氮效率及对低氮胁迫的生理响应. 中国农业科学, 2018,51(16):3074-3083.
[12]	刘鹏, 武爱莲, 王劲松, 等. 不同基因型高粱的磷效率和磷素转运特性研究. 山西农业科学, 2018,46(3):344-349.
[13]	马建华, 王玉国, 孙毅, 等. 低磷胁迫对不同品种高粱苗期形态及生理指标的影响. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2013,19(5):1083-1091.
[14]	张桂香, 赵学孟, 高儒萍, 等. 高粱遗传资源的耐瘠性鉴定研究. 山西农业科学, 1997,25(3):12-16.
[15]	张桂香, 王呈祥, 高儒萍, 等. 高粱主要性状与耐瘠性的相关分析. 山西农业科学, 1998,26(4):24-26.
[16]	潘中涛, 张鹏, 潘周云, 等. 安单系列杂交玉米品种的耐瘠性评价. 贵州农业科学, 2013,41(1):53-55.
[17]	吴秀红, 郭泰, 王志新, 等. 耐瘠薄大豆新品种合农62的选育与栽培技术. 黑龙江农业科学, 2011(12):4-6.
[18]	康万利, 揭雨成, 邢虎成. 10个苎麻种质资源耐瘠性鉴定评价. 植物遗传资源学报, 2012,13(6):1023-1030.
[19]	李丰先, 周宇飞, 王艺陶, 等. 高粱品种萌发期耐碱性筛选与综合鉴定. 中国农业科学, 2013,46(9):1762-1771.
[20]	张士超, 袁芳, 郭建荣, 等. 利用隶属函数值法对甜高粱苗期耐盐性的综合评价. 植物生理学报, 2015,51(6):893-902.
[21]	王晨, 陈吉宝, 庞振凌, 等. 甜高粱对混合盐碱胁迫的响应及耐盐碱种质鉴定. 作物杂志, 2016(1):56-61.
[22]	张笑笑, 潘映红, 任富莉, 等. 基于多重表型分析的准确评价高粱抗旱性方法的建立. 作物学报, 2019,45(11):1735-1745.
[23]	卢庆善. 高粱学. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 1999: 63-66.
[24]	高雪, 朱林, 苏莹. 基于隶属函数法的甜高粱孕穗期耐盐性综合评价. 南方农业学报, 2018,49(9):1736-1744.
[25]	陈冰嬬, 徐宁, 李淑杰, 等. 高粱亲本系萌发期抗旱性鉴定. 中国农业大学学报, 2018,23(8):17-29.
[26]	高春华, 朱金英, 张华文, 等. 38个粒用高粱品种芽期耐盐性的综合鉴定及评价. 核农学报, 2019,33(9):1841-1855.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

Comments

Recommended 0

No Suggested Reading articles found!

级别Grade	隶属函数值U value	耐瘠性Barren tolerance
1	U≥0.7	极强
2	0.6≤U<0.7	强
3	0.5≤U<0.6	中等
4	0.4≤U<0.5	弱
5	U<0.4	极弱

项目Item	对照CK	瘠薄Barren	差值Differnce value	变异系数Coefficient of variation
出苗-开花天数Days of seedling-flowering (d)	72.00	81^**	-9.00	0.10
株高Plant height (cm)	126.84	131.51^*	-4.67	0.17
茎粗Stem diameter (cm)	1.69	1.20^**	0.49	0.24
穗长Panicle length (cm)	24.46	21.80^**	2.66	0.14
穗宽Panicle width (cm)	8.58	6.18^**	2.40	0.24
穗粒重Grain weight per panicle (g)	51.05	26.41^**	24.64	0.46
千粒重1000-grain weight (g)	27.46	25.33^**	2.13	0.15

Identification and Evaluation of Sorghum Breeding Resources for Barren Tolerance

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 8

References 26

Related Articles 15

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 0

编号 No.	材料名称 Name	类型 Type	来源 Origin	编号 No.	材料名称 Name	类型 Type	来源 Origin	编号 No.	材料名称 Name	类型 Type	来源 Origin
1	B2 7050	保持系	中国	20	Tx432	保持系	美国	39	晋粱5号	恢复系	中国
2	B泸45	保持系	中国	21	BV4	保持系	印度	40	1383-2	恢复系	中国
3	BE35/糖	保持系	中国	22	Ho275	保持系	印度	41	SX-30	恢复系	中国
4	A2早B/Tx623-11B	保持系	中国	23	Ho277	保持系	印度	42	363C/2691	恢复系	中国
5	A2早B/Tx623-5B	保持系	中国	24	Ho447	保持系	印度	43	Sug中秆	恢复系	中国
6	BSX44	保持系	中国	25	Ho260	保持系	印度	44	HC356	恢复系	中国
7	B6-6	保持系	中国	26	E35-1	保持系	印度	45	34-33-2	恢复系	中国
8	L9198/TMS	保持系	中国	27	0-01	恢复系	中国	46	1877/J7654	恢复系	中国
9	冀蚜2号	保持系	中国	28	038R	恢复系	中国	47	A3R0-30/0-30黑三	恢复系	中国
10	BTx3197	保持系	美国	29	103R	恢复系	中国	48	0-30	恢复系	中国
11	BTx378	保持系	美国	30	035R	恢复系	中国	49	53H	恢复系	中国
12	BTx623	保持系	美国	31	16R	恢复系	中国	50	L黑-4/吉7031-2	恢复系	中国
13	BTx623 bmr6	保持系	美国	32	L2381-1	恢复系	中国	51	吉7030-4	恢复系	中国
14	Tx7078	保持系	美国	33	TC1383-2-1	恢复系	中国	52	741324	恢复系	中国
15	B35	保持系	美国	34	T12S3A-1/L92899-R473-2	恢复系	中国	53	961547	恢复系	美国
16	TAM428	保持系	美国	35	L220	恢复系	中国	54	Sc499-14E	恢复系	美国
17	B232E	保持系	美国	36	三尺三	恢复系	中国	55	Sc240-14E	恢复系	美国
18	BTx7000	保持系	美国	37	晋辐1号	恢复系	中国	56	R9188	恢复系	美国
19	黑Tx430	保持系	美国	38	R111	恢复系	中国

编号 No.	对照 CK	瘠薄 Barren	X	编号 No.	对照 CK	瘠薄 Barren	X	编号 No.	对照 CK	瘠薄 Barren	X	编号 No.	对照 CK	瘠薄 Barren	X
1	80±2	91±4^**	1.14	15	62±1	70±3^**	1.13	29	77±2	83±2	1.08	43	78±2	90±3^**	1.16
2	75±2	86±2^**	1.15	16	72±6	80±3^**	1.10	30	81±2	88±1	1.09	44	77±3	86±5^**	1.11
3	74±0	83±2^**	1.12	17	73±5	80±3^*	1.10	31	76±2	85±3^**	1.12	45	66±1	76±1^**	1.16
4	62±5	66±5	1.08	18	69±5	82±1^**	1.18	32	78±4	87±2^**	1.11	46	61±2	69±2^**	1.13
5	60±2	65±2	1.08	19	66±3	74±5^**	1.13	33	77±2	87±1^**	1.14	47	73±2	81±3^**	1.11
6	68±4	73±3	1.07	20	66±2	74±3^**	1.13	34	75±3	86±1^**	1.14	48	77±3	83±2^*	1.09
7	68±3	81±3^**	1.19	21	68±3	74±1	1.09	35	77±2	89±2^**	1.15	49	70±2	78±2^**	1.10
8	76±3	85±2^**	1.12	22	76±3	84±2^**	1.11	36	66±2	74±2^**	1.13	50	75±2	82±3^*	1.09
9	75±2	88±4^**	1.17	23	81±5	91±2^**	1.12	37	74±0	81±2^**	1.10	51	62±2	69±2^*	1.11
10	67±1	75±1^**	1.13	24	77±4	85±2^**	1.11	38	74±1	82±1^**	1.11	52	64±0	71±4^**	1.12
11	73±1	78±1	1.07	25	80±4	92±2^**	1.15	39	77±5	87±3^**	1.13	53	78±2	92±4^**	1.18
12	67±1	76±2^**	1.14	26	76±2	88±2^**	1.16	40	76±2	84±2^**	1.11	54	80±2	90±5^**	1.13
13	71±2	79±3^**	1.11	27	77±3	83±2	1.09	41	78±2	88±3^**	1.13	55	73±1	80±2^*	1.10
14	69±3	81±2^**	1.16	28	77±1	85±0^**	1.11	42	73±3	79±1^*	1.09	56	63±3	75±4^**	1.19

性状Trait	出苗-开花天数 Days of seedling- flowering	株高 Plant height	茎粗 Stem diameter	穗长 Panicle length	穗宽 Panicle width	穗粒重 Grain weight per panicle	千粒重 1000-grain weight
出苗-开花天数Days of seedling-flowering	-1.00
株高Plant height	-0.02	1.00
茎粗Stem diameter	-0.23	-0.05	1.00
穗长Panicle length	-0.52^**	0.20	0.30^*	1.00
穗宽Panicle width	-0.23	-0.14	0.56^**	0.24	1.00
穗粒重Grain weight per panicle	-0.21	-0.25	0.54^**	0.19	0.40^**	1.00
千粒重1000-grain weight	-0.02	-0.17	0.12	0.21	0.17	0.43^**	1.00

[1]	Gao Jie, Feng Guangcai, Li Xiaorong, Li Qingfeng, Peng Qiu. Phenotypic Diversity and Clustering Analysis of Sorghum Germplasm Resources in Different Regions of Guizhou Province [J]. Crops, 2020, 36(6): 54-60.
[2]	Shi Lijuan, Bai Wenbin, Cao Changlin, Gao Peng. Effects of Exogenous Selenium Application on Yield, Grain Selenium Content and Quality in Sorghum [J]. Crops, 2020, 36(3): 191-196.
[3]	Zhao Xunchao,Xu Jingyu,Gai Shengnan,Wei Yulei,Xu Xiaoxuan,Ding Dong,Liu Meng,Zhang Jinjie,Shao Wenjing. Identification of Stearyl -ACP Desaturase Gene (SbSAD) Family and Their Expression Analysis at Different Developmental Stages in Sorghum [J]. Crops, 2020, 36(2): 20-27.
[4]	Gao Jie,Li Qingfeng,Li Xiaorong,Feng Guangcai,Peng Qiu. Analysis of the Characteristics of Dry Matter Production and Light Energy Utilization of Waxy Sorghum Applied in Different Eras in Guizhou Province [J]. Crops, 2020, 36(1): 41-46.
[5]	Fan Xinqi,Wang Haiyan,Nie Meng′en,Zhao Xingkui,Zhang Yizhong,Yang Huiyong,Zhang Xiaojuan,Liang Du,Duan Yonghong,Liu Qingshan. Effects of EMS Mutagenesis on Emergence and Agronomic Traits in Sorghum [J]. Crops, 2020, 36(1): 47-54.
[6]	Tang Taoxia,Wang Zhihe,Shi Zhiguo,Chang Ying,Zhang Yingying,Li Yanrong. Research on the Absorption of Heavy Metals by Different Genotypes in Sweet Sorghum [J]. Crops, 2019, 35(6): 50-56.
[7]	Liang Xiaohong,Zhang Ruidong,Huang Minjia,Liu Jing,Cao Xiong. Interaction of Film Mulching and Nitrogen Application on Yield, Water and Nitrogen Use Efficiency of Sorghum [J]. Crops, 2019, 35(5): 135-142.
[8]	Wang Jinsong,Dong Erwei,Jiao Xiaoyan,Wu Ailian,Bai Wenbin,Wang Lige,Guo Jun,Han Xiong,Liu Qingshan. Effects of Different Planting Patterns on Yield and Nutrient Absorption of Sorghum Jinnuo 3 [J]. Crops, 2019, 35(5): 166-172.
[9]	Gao Jie,Li Qingfeng,Li Xiaorong,Feng Guangcai,Peng Qiu. Variation Analysis of Agronomic Traits of Waxy Sorghum Varieties (Lines) in Different Eras in Guizhou Province [J]. Crops, 2019, 35(4): 17-23.
[10]	Shi Liran,Bai Lirong,Lü Yaci,Zhao Minghui,Zhao Fengwu,Li Huimin. Analysis of Salt Tolerance at the Seedling Stage of Wheat Hybrid Variety Heng 9966 [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(6): 149-153.
[11]	Li Chunhong,Lu Xianglong,Zhang Peitong,Su Yanjing,Wang Yiming,Guo Wenqi,Yin Jianmei,Han Xiaoyong,Wang Li,Huo Enjie. Screening Herbicides to Control Weeds for Sweet Sorghum [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(6): 158-161.
[12]	Zhang Yizhong,Zhou Fuping,Zhang Xiaojuan,Shao Qiang,Yang Bin,Liu Qingshan. Identification and Cluster Analysis of Photosynthetic Characters and WUE in Sorghum Germplasm [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 45-53.
[13]	Zhang Ruidong,Cao Xiong,Yue Zhongxiao,Liang Xiaohong,Liu Jing,Huang Minjia. Effects of Nitrogen and Density Interaction on Grain Yield and Nitrogen Use Efficiency of Sorghum [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 110-115.
[14]	Zhang Jianhua,Guo Ruifeng,Cao Changlin,Fan Na,Jiang Baiyang,Li Guang,Shi Lijuan,Peng Zhidong,Bai Wenbin. Study on Effect and Safety of Controlling Weed in Sorghum Field by Several Stem and Leaf Treatment Herbicide [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 162-166.
[15]	Jie Gao,Qingfeng Li,Qiu Peng,Xiaoyan Jiao,Jinsong Wang. Effects of Different Nutrient Combinations on Plant Production and Nitrogen, Phosphorus and Potassium Utilization Characteristics in Waxy Sorghum [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 138-142.