Crops ›› 2020, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (3): 191-196.doi: 10.16035/j.issn.1001-7283.2020.03.029

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Effects of Exogenous Selenium Application on Yield, Grain Selenium Content and Quality in Sorghum

Shi Lijuan1,2, Bai Wenbin1,2(), Cao Changlin1,2, Gao Peng1   

  1. 1Institute of Sorghum, Shanxi Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Yuci 030600, Shanxi, China
    2Shanxi Key Laboratory of Sorghum Genetics and Germplasm Enhancement, Yuci 030600, Shanxi, China
  • Received:2019-09-10 Revised:2020-03-30 Online:2020-06-15 Published:2020-06-10
  • Contact: Wenbin Bai E-mail:baiwenbin1983@126.com

RichHTML

5

PDF (PC)

219

Abstract:

In the key growth period of sorghum, different doses of sodium selenite (Na2SeO3) were sprayed on the leaves to study the effects of exogenous selenium on the yield, quality and selenium content of sorghum and to determine the optimal dose and optimum period for the application of exogenous selenium in sorghum so as to provide theoretical basis for the further study on the effects of selenium on the physiological mechanism of sorghum and the production of selenium-rich sorghum. The variety Jinnuo 3 was used as the experimental material, using randomized block test, and five selenium concentrations were designed, 0 (CK), 40 (T1), 80 (T2), 120 (T3), 160 (T4) 160mg/kg Na2SeO3. Foliar exogenous selenium was sprayed at seedling stage, jointing stage and flag-picking stage to study the changes of yield, quality and grain selenium content of sorghum seeds under the conditions of different spraying periods and different closes. The results showed that the application of exogenous selenium could improve the grain selenium content of sorghum to some extent. The effect of spraying exogenous selenium on the selenium content of sorghum grain in different periods was in the order of flag-picking stage > jointing stage > seedling stage. Within the safe intake range of selenium absorbed by the human body, the selenium content of Jinnuo 3 grain at the T2 dosage during the flag-picking period averaged 0.295mg/kg in two years, an average increase of 83.5% than CK. Foliar spraying selenium could significantly improve crude protein and crude starch content of sorghum grain, the impact of spraying time on grain crude protein and crude starch content was in the order of flag-picking stage > jointing stage > seedling stage > CK. The contents of crude protein and crude starch at flag-picking stage with T2 treatment were the highest, and were 11.25% and 1.40% higher than CK, respectively. Na2SeO3 spraying on leaves could obviously increase the selenium content, improve the nutritional quality and increase the yield of sorghum. In summary, the flag-picking period is the best selenium-rich spraying period, and the most suitable foliar selenium (Na2SeO3) dosage is 80mg/kg.

Key words: Sorghum, Selenium content, Quality, Yield

Table 1

Chemical properties of soil (0-20cm) in experiment site"

年份
Year		 有机质
Organic matter
(g/kg)		 全氮
Total nitrogen
(g/kg)		 碱解氮
Alkaline nitrogen
(mg/kg)		 速效磷
Olsen phosphorus
(mg/kg)		 速效钾
Available potassium
(mg/kg)		 全硒
Total selenium
(mg/kg)		 pH
2017 11.20 0.875 49.28 19.05 129.0 0.172 7.0
2018 10.98 0.867 48.76 18.92 126.5 0.163 7.3

Table 2

Effects of spraying exogenous selenium at different growth stages on 1000-grain weight and yield of sorghum"

年份
Year		 处理
Treatment		 千粒重1000-grain weight (g) 产量Yield (kg/hm2)
苗期
Seedling stage		 拔节期
Jointing stage		 挑旗期
Flag-picking stage		 苗期
Seedling stage		 拔节期
Jointing stage		 挑旗期
Flag-picking stage
2017 CK 30.93±0.31a 30.93±0.32a 30.92±0.20a 8 246.6±119.1a 8 246.6±119.1a 8 299.9±147.7a
T1 31.13±0.12a 31.13±0.15a 31.17±0.31a 8 242.8±99.7a 8 280.1±128.3a 8 313.3±79.0a
T2 31.30±0.20a 31.20±0.10a 31.30±0.00a 8 461.4±86.6a 8 398.1±138.1a 8 469.1±100.7a
T3 30.96±0.21a 31.17±0.15a 31.17±0.15a 8 403.6±171.5a 8 265.2±123.9a 8 348.8±35.1a
T4 30.93±0.31a 31.10±0.14a 30.93±0.38a 8 251.3±142.4a 8 188.6±53.18a 8 260.3±189.8a
2018 CK 27.38±0.24a 27.71±0.37a 27.65±0.40a 7 981.3±76.4a 8 057.5±75.9a 8 080.9±99.4a
T1 27.80±0.30a 27.77±0.55a 27.88±0.60a 8 035.1±123.6a 8 081.5±101.0a 8 100.5±130.2a
T2 27.89±0.23a 28.13±0.24a 28.40±0.24a 8 133.1±131.9a 8 224.1±66.5a 8 266.4±88.8a
T3 27.76±0.55a 27.81±0.37a 28.10±0.65a 8 079.1±82.9a 8 181.8±104.4a 8 192.9±98.3a
T4 27.71±0.18a 27.70±0.48a 27.70±0.53a 8 059.3±81.4a 8 109.2±114.4a 8 089.3±128.3a

Fig.1

Effects of different spraying doses of exogenous Se on Se content of sorghum grain at different stages in 2017-2018 Values followed by different capital and small letters are significantly different among different Se concentration treatments at 1% and 5% level, respectively"

Table 3

Effects of different spraying doses of exogenous Se on crude protein content of sorghum grain at different growth stages %"

年份
Year		 处理Treatment 苗期
Seedling stage		 拔节期
Jointing stage		 挑旗期
Flag-picking stage
2017 CK 8.51±0.03Bbc 8.49±0.04Bb 8.47±0.05Bb
T1 8.55±0.01Bb 8.56±0.09ABb 8.48±0.03Bb
T2 8.64±0.01Aa 8.66±0.03Aa 9.39±0.07Aa
T3 8.50±0.02BCc 8.57±0.04ABab 9.31±0.02Aa
T4 8.44±0.04Cd 8.51±0.06Bb 8.39±0.07Bb
2018 CK 8.59±0.01Bb 8.57±0.06Bb 8.53±0.04Bb
T1 8.60±0.02Bb 8.58±0.09ABb 8.55±0.03Bb
T2 8.77±0.03Aa 8.77±0.06Aa 9.52±0.04Aa
T3 8.54±0.03Bc 8.65±0.04ABab 9.49±0.03Aa
T4 8.45±0.02Cd 8.56±0.10Bb 8.60±0.05Bb

Table 4

Effects of different spraying doses of exogenous Se on crude starch content of sorghum grain at different growth stages %"

年份
Year		 处理
Treatment		 苗期
Seedling stage		 拔节期
Jointing stage		 挑旗期
Flag-picking stage
2017 CK 71.35±0.11ab 71.41±0.07Bbc 71.30±0.08Bbc
T1 71.44±0.73ab 71.71±0.33ABb 71.56±0.32ABb
T2 72.03±0.08a 72.13±0.07Aa 72.15±0.35Aa
T3 71.25±0.43b 71.31±0.17Bc 71.47±0.071Bbc
T4 71.20±0.40b 71.17±0.28Bc 71.25±0.21Bc
2018 CK 71.59±0.14ab 71.52±0.08Bbc 71.60±0.24Bbc
T1 71.82±0.20ab 71.84±0.30ABb 71.88±0.11ABb
T2 72.53±0.09a 72.55±0.10Aa 72.57±0.11Aa
T3 71.62±1.10ab 71.24±0.25Bc 71.85±0.45Bb
T4 71.33±0.76b 71.12±0.56Bc 71.23±0.30Bc

Table 5

Effects of different spraying doses of exogenous Se on crude fat content of sorghum grain at different growth stages %"

年份
Year		 处理
Treatment		 苗期
Seedling stage		 拔节期
Jointing stage		 挑旗期
Flag-picking stage
2017 CK 2.53±0.04a 2.53±0.06a 2.52±0.01a
T1 2.55±0.08a 2.66±0.09a 2.57±0.08a
T2 2.63±0.10a 2.66±0.13a 2.64±0.12a
T3 2.60±0.01a 2.60±0.07a 2.60±0.02a
T4 2.54±0.05a 2.52±0.08a 2.54±0.08a
2018 CK 2.51±0.13a 2.49±0.10a 2.53±0.02a
T1 2.64±0.10a 2.61±0.15a 2.54±0.06a
T2 2.64±0.04a 2.65±0.08a 2.65±0.10a
T3 2.58±0.10a 2.59±0.03a 2.60±0.08a
T4 2.51±0.04a 2.50±0.04a 2.55±0.10a
[1] Cai X L, Wang C, Yu W Q , et al. Selenium exposure and cancer risk:An updated meta-analysis and meta-regression. Scientific Reports, 2016,6:1-18.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-016-0001-8
[2] 李海蓉, 杨林生, 谭见安 , 等. 我国地理环境硒缺乏与健康研究进展. 生物技术进展, 2017,7(5):381-386.
[3] 宁婵娟, 丁宁, 吴国良 , 等. 喷硒时期与浓度对红富士苹果果实品质及各部位全硒和有机硒含量的影响. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2013,19(5):1109-1117.
doi: 10.11674/zwyf.2013.0510
[4] 余守武, 陈合云, 郑学强 , 等. 水稻微量元素硒含量的遗传研究进展. 作物杂志, 2010(2):6-10.
[5] 邓正春, 吴平安, 吴仁明 , 等. 硒对农作物生长发育的影响及其补充方法. 作物研究, 2014,28(6):771-774.
[6] 赵中秋, 郑海雷, 张春光 , 等. 土壤硒及其与植物硒营养的关系. 生态学杂志, 2003,22(1):22-25.
[7] 黄丽美, 徐宁彤, 曲琪环 . 硒对玉米产量及籽粒营养品质、重金属含量的影响. 江苏农业科学, 2017,45(10):59-61.
[8] 蒋芳山, 张海军, 吕连杰 , 等. 叶面喷施亚硒酸钠对黑粒小麦籽粒硒含量、产量及品质的影响. 麦类作物学报, 2018,38(12):1496-1503.
[9] 刘庆, 田侠, 史衍玺 . 施硒对小麦籽粒硒富集、转化及蛋白质与矿质元素含量的影响. 作物学报, 2016,42(5):778-783.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2016.00778
[10] 卢庆善, 邹剑秋, 朱凯 , 等. 试论我国高粱产业发展——一论全国高粱生产优势区. 杂粮作物, 2009,29(2):78-80.
[11] 李晓春, 潘金德, 毛春国 , 等. 原子荧光法测定植物样品中的硒. 广东微量元素科学, 2017,45(23):111-113.
[12] 沈业松, 王歆, 顾正中 , 等. 296份黄淮麦区小麦品种资源在江苏淮北地区的品质分析. 浙江农业学报, 2018,30(10):1617-1623.
[13] 钟红舰 . 索氏抽提法测定粗脂肪含量的改进. 中国饲料, 2004,12(3):35.
[14] 鲍士旦 . 土壤农化分析(第3版). 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2005.
[15] 张新军, 杨才, 曾昭海 , 等. 叶面喷施硒肥对裸燕麦产量和品质的影响. 麦类作物学报, 2015,35(3):408-412.
[16] 李鸣凤, 邓小芳, 付小丽 , 等. 不同硒源对小麦生长、硒吸收利用以及玉米后效的影响. 农业环境科学学报, 2017,36(1):1-7.
[17] 陈雪, 沈方科, 梁欢婷 , 等. 外源施硒措施对水稻产量品质及植株硒分布的影响. 南方农业学报, 2017,48(1):46-50.
[18] 郝玉波, 刘华琳, 慈晓科 , 等. 施硒对两种类型玉米硒元素分配及产量、品质的影响. 应用生态学报, 2012,23(2):411-418.
[19] 张妮, 李琦, 张栋 , 等. 外源硒对滴灌小麦籽粒硒含量及产量的影响. 麦类作物学报, 2015,35(7):995-1001.
[20] Lyons G H, Judson G J, Ortiz-Monasterio I , et al. Selenium in Australia:Selenium status and biofortification of wheat for better health. Journal of Trace Elements in Medicine and Biology, 2005,19(1):75-82.
doi: 10.1016/j.jtemb.2005.04.005
[21] 徐琴, 王孟, 谢义梅 , 等. 施硒对水稻外观品质及籽粒硒、镉和砷含量的影响. 中国农业科技导报, 2019,21(5):135-140.
[22] 钟莉传, 刘云, 刘义明 . 硒肥施用时期对花生硒含量及产量的影响. 花生学报, 2016,45(1):64-66.
[23] 穆婷婷, 杜慧玲, 张福耀 , 等. 外源硒对谷子生理特性、硒含量及其产量和品质的影响. 中国农业科学, 2017,50(1):51-63.
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2017.01.005
[24] 穆婷婷, 张福耀, 李志华 , 等. 不同时期施硒对谷子硒含量、有机硒转化率及谷子品质的影响. 华北农学报, 2018,33(6):193-198.
[25] 高贞攀, 郭平毅, 原向阳 , 等. 叶面喷施亚硒酸钠对谷子籽粒含硒量及品质的影响. 山西农业大学学报(自然科学版), 2015,32(2):157-161.
[1] Song Xiao, Huang Chenchen, Huang Shaomin, Zhang Keke, Yue Ke, Zhang Shuiqing, Guo Doudou, Zhang Yuting. Effects of Tillage and Organic Fertilization Modes on Soil Physical and Chemical Properties and Wheat Yield [J]. Crops, 2020, 36(3): 102-108.
[2] Zhang Yang, Zhang Wei, Zhao Weijun, Shao Rongfeng, Wang Guan, Xue Dingding, Li Jinmei. Variety Screening and Study of Cultivation Technology for Forage Triticale Varieties Based on Principal Component and Grey Relation Analysis [J]. Crops, 2020, 36(3): 117-124.
[3] Tian Yucong, Duan Menjun, Zhu Jie, Feng Xiangzhao, Gao Zhenzhen, Liu Zhangyong, Chen Fu, Jin Tao. Effects of Meteorological Conditions on Formation of High Quality Ratoon Rice [J]. Crops, 2020, 36(3): 125-131.
[4] Lai Rifang, Zheng Axiang, Luo Haowen, Wu Tiaoyan, Zhao Xuze, He Longxin, Wang Lianxiang, Tang Xiangru. Effects of Different Seedling Raising Methods on Seedling Quality and Physiological Characteristics of Machine-Transplanted Aromatic Rice [J]. Crops, 2020, 36(3): 137-141.
[5] Lü Guangde, Yin Fuwei, Sun Yingying, Qian Zhaoguo, Xu Jiali, Li Ning, Xue Lina, Wu Ke. Effects of Different Seeding Rates on Yield, Dry Matter Accumulation and Distribution of Linmai 4 [J]. Crops, 2020, 36(3): 142-148.
[6] Chai Fangmei, Gao Tiantian, Chai Shouxi, Cheng Hongbo, Song Yali, Lu Qinglin. Effects of Planting Density on Wheat Yield Formation in Different Ecological Regions of Gansu Province [J]. Crops, 2020, 36(3): 154-160.
[7] Chen Juan, He Jinhong, Liu Jili, Kang Jianhong, Wu Na. Effect of Different Planting Patterns on Starch Formation and Yield of Potato in Semi-Arid Area [J]. Crops, 2020, 36(3): 169-176.
[8] Zhu Yingjie, Liu Fuqi, Zhang Yan, Chang Xuhong, Wang Demei, Tao Zhiqiang, Wang Yanjie, Yang Yushuang, Zhao Guangcai. Effect of Nitrogen Treatment on Wheat Yield and Quality in Different Soil Conditions [J]. Crops, 2020, 36(3): 184-190.
[9] Zhu An,Gao Jie,Huang Jian,Wang Hao,Chen Yun,Liu Lijun. Advances in Morphology and Physiology of Root and Their Relationships with Grain Quality in Rice [J]. Crops, 2020, 36(2): 1-8.
[10] Shen Hongtao,Zhang Fusheng,Li Dong,Qiu Jianhua,Cai Xinghong,Qin Yubao. Effects of Different Preceding Crops and Planting Density on Yield and Quality of Flue-Cured Tobacco in Mudanjiang [J]. Crops, 2020, 36(2): 105-111.
[11] Li Ruijie,Tang Huihui,Wang Qingyan,Xu Yanli,Fang Mengying,Yan Peng,Dong Zhiqiang,Zhang Fenglu. Effects of 5- Aminolevulinic Acid and Ethylene Compounds on Photosynthetic Characteristics and Yield of Spring Maize in Northeast China [J]. Crops, 2020, 36(2): 125-133.
[12] Chen Diwen,Zhou Wenling,Ao Junhua,Huang Ying,Jiang Yong,Han Xihong,Qin Yimin,Shen Hong. Effects of Seaweed Extract on Yield, Quality and Nitrogen Use Efficiency of Sweet Corn [J]. Crops, 2020, 36(2): 134-139.
[13] Yan Hua,Yan Zhongwen,Lei Jie. Climate Change Characteristics of Xinyuan during 1981-2018 and Its Impact on Spring Maize [J]. Crops, 2020, 36(2): 140-146.
[14] Zhou Wei,Cui Fuzhu,Duan Hongkai,Hao Guohua,Yang Hui,Liu Ruirui. Effects of Sowing Date on Yield and Quality of Waxy Maize [J]. Crops, 2020, 36(2): 156-161.
[15] Wang Tianwen,Li Changzhong,Chen Guanghai. Effects of Sowing Dates and Densities on Propagation, Growth and Yield of Potato Seeds [J]. Crops, 2020, 36(2): 162-167.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!