Crops ›› 2023, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (4): 210-214.doi: 10.16035/j.issn.1001-7283.2023.04.030

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Effects of Straw Returning and Reducing Nitrogen Application on Soil Nutrients, Enzyme Activities and Wheat Yield

Liu Hongjie1(), Ren Dechao1(), Ni Yongjing1, Ge Jun1, Zhang Suyu1, Lü Guohua2, Hu Xin1   

  1. 1Shangqiu Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences, Shangqiu 476000, Henan, China
    2Institute of Environment and Sustainable Development in Agriculture, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China
  • Received:2022-01-04 Revised:2022-04-02 Online:2023-08-15 Published:2023-08-15

RichHTML

5

PDF (PC)

128

Abstract:

In order to explore the potential of nitrogen reduction in winter wheat planting in eastern Henan province, the effects of straw returning and reducing nitrogen application on soil nutrients, enzyme activities and yield by three-year field experiment were studied. The results showed that compared with the total nitrogen treatment with straw removal, the reducing nitrogen application under straw returning was beneficial to the increase of soil organic matter content. The reduction of nitrogen application with 20% and 40% could significantly increase the soil organic matter content. Reducing nitrogen application had no significant effect on the contents of soil total nitrogen and available phosphorus. The straw returning could increase the content of soil available potassium, the increase range of soil available potassium was about 6.5% under 20% and 40% reduction nitrogen application treatments, respectively, except the two treatments, the other treatments had significant differences with the straw removal treatment. There were certain positive effects with straw returning on soil pH, and straw returning could be slowed down the degree of soil acidification, but it was not significant. Straw returning and nitrogen application could increase the soil catalase, alkaline phosphatase and sucrase activities, and reducing nitrogen application was more beneficial to the increase of soil enzyme activity. There was no significant effect on soil urease activity by straw returning and reducing nitrogen application. The yields of the 20% and 40% reduction in nitrogen application treatments were at a high level, and there was no significant difference in grain number per spike, 1000-grain weight with total nitrogen application treatment. The spike number of the 40% reduction nitrogen application treatment was the highest, but there was no significant difference with other treatments. In conclusion, the 40% reduction nitrogen application (180kg/ha) with straw returning to field still had high yield.

Key words: Straw returning, Reducing nitrogen application, Soil nutrients, Enzyme activities, Yield

Table 1

Effects of different treatments on soil nutrient contents and pH"

处理
Treatment		 有机质
Organic matter (g/kg)		 全氮
Total nitrogen (g/kg)		 有效磷
Available phosphorus (g/kg)		 速效钾
Available potassium (mg/kg)		 pH
T1 19.32±0.68bc 1.10±0.05b 43.35±2.12c 234.64±15.25a 7.52±0.26a
T2 19.36±1.12bc 1.11±1.11b 44.30±0.69bc 217.90±14.16ab 7.67±0.31a
T3 21.16±0.95ab 1.13±1.13b 45.85±1.33bc 202.55±13.37bc 7.51±0.23a
T4 21.80±1.09a 1.17±0.08ab 48.06±1.63a 201.90±8.98bc 7.42±0.15a
T5 20.79±1.25abc 1.31±1.31a 47.40±1.13a 229.57±10.82a 7.19±0.29ab
T6 18.86±0.87c 1.24±1.24ab 46.07±2.40abc 189.58±12.15c 6.95±0.32b

Table 2

Effects of different treatments on soil enzyme activities"

处理
Treatment		 过氧化氢酶
Catalase
[mg/(g·20min)]		 脲酶
Urease
[mg/(g·h)]		 碱性磷酸酶
Alkaline
phosphatase
[mg/(g·h)]		 蔗糖酶
Sucrase
[mg/(g·h)]
T1 3.55±0.18a 11.44±0.71a 0.26±0.01bc 0.48±0.02c
T2 3.47±0.14a 11.52±0.40a 0.33±0.01a 0.57±0.05ab
T3 3.11±0.07b 11.67±0.29a 0.34±0.01a 0.60±0.02a
T4 3.02±0.16bc 11.58±0.75a 0.28±0.02b 0.58±0.02ab
T5 2.63±0.09d 11.49±0.44a 0.24±0.02c 0.53±0.02bc
T6 2.84±0.10cd 11.87±0.77a 0.20±0.01d 0.50±0.03c

Table 3

Effects of different treatments on wheat yield and its components"

处理
Treatment		 穗粒数
Grain number
per spike		 穗数
Spike number
(×104/hm2)		 千粒重
1000-grain
weight (g)		 产量
Yield
(kg/hm2)
T1 33.80±1.89a 508.00±23.37d 45.37±1.09a 6974.64±313.86c
T2 28.37±1.96c 659.20±16.22ab 45.14±1.81a 7535.97±218.54bc
T3 30.37±1.06bc 706.90±46.66a 43.48±2.34a 8032.50±409.66ab
T4 31.87±1.10ab 602.85±8.65bc 45.92±1.57a 8197.74±323.81a
T5 32.70±1.64ab 599.06±23.66bc 44.38±1.07a 7753.55±269.62ab
T6 32.86±2.14ab 567.94±35.25c 45.73±1.55a 7413.59±380.32bc

Fig.1

Effects of different nitrogen applications on winter wheat yield under straw returning"

[1] 南雄雄, 田霄鸿, 张琳, 等. 小麦和玉米秸秆腐解特点及对土壤中碳、氮含量的影响. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2010, 16(3):626-633.
[2] 毕于运, 王亚静, 高春雨, 等. 中国主要秸秆资源数量及其区域分布. 农机化研究, 2010, 32(3):1-7.
[3] 张唯乐, 戴志刚, 任涛, 等. 不同水旱轮作体系秸秆还田与氮肥运筹对作物产量及养分吸收利用的影响. 中国农业科学, 2016, 49(7):1254-1266.
[4] 王宜伦, 刘天学, 赵鹏, 等. 施氮量对超高产夏玉米产量与氮素吸收及土壤硝态氮的影响. 中国农业科学, 2013, 46(12):2483-2491.
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2013.12.009
[5] 赵吉平, 权宝全, 郭鹏燕, 等. 秸秆还田与施氮量对土壤质量及小麦产量的影响. 华北农学报, 2021, 36(2):176-181.
doi: 10.7668/hbnxb.20191555
[6] 薛志伟, 杨春玲. 秸秆还田条件下氮肥用量对冬小麦生长发育及产量的影响. 作物研究, 2021, 35(3):200-204.
[7] Miao Y X, Stewart B A, Zhang F S. Long-term experiments for sustainable nutrient management in China. A review. Agronomy for Sustainable Development, 2011, 31(2):397-414.
doi: 10.1051/agro/2010034
[8] Ninh H T, Grandy A S, Wickings K, et al. Organic amendment effects on potato productivity and quality are related to soil microbial activity. Plant and Soil, 2015, 386(1/2):223-236.
doi: 10.1007/s11104-014-2223-5
[9] Sun R, Guo X, Wang D, et al. Effects of long-term application of chemical and organic fertilizers on the abundance of microbial communities involved in the nitrogen cycle. Applied Soil Ecology, 2015, 95:171-178.
doi: 10.1016/j.apsoil.2015.06.010
[10] Chen Y, Xin L, Liu J, et al. Changes in bacterial community of soil induced by long-term straw returning. Scientia Agricola, 2017, 74(5):349-356.
doi: 10.1590/1678-992x-2016-0025
[11] 成臣, 汪建军, 程慧煌, 等. 秸秆还田与耕作方式对双季稻产量及土壤肥力质量的影响. 土壤学报, 2018, 55(1):247-257.
[12] 杨艳华, 苏瑶, 何振超, 等. 还田秸秆碳在土壤中的转化分配及土壤有机碳库影响的研究进展. 应用生态学报, 2019, 30 (2):668-676.
[13] 董印丽, 李振峰, 王若伦, 等. 华北地区小麦、玉米两季秸秆还田存在问题及对策研究. 中国土壤与肥料, 2018(1):159- 163.
[14] 吴玉红, 郝兴顺, 田霄鸿, 等. 秸秆还田与化肥减量配施对稻茬麦土壤养分、酶活性及产量影响. 西南农业学报, 2018, 31 (5):998-1005.
[15] 鲁如坤. 土壤农业化学分析方法. 北京: 中国农业科技出版社, 2000.
[16] 关松荫. 土壤酶及其研究法. 北京: 农业出版社,1986.
[17] Yang Y H, Su Y, He Z C, et al. Transformation and distribution of straw-derived carbon in soil and the effects on soil organic carbon pool: A review. The Journal of Applied Ecology, 2019, 30(2):668-676.
[18] 严奉君, 孙永健, 马均, 等. 秸秆覆盖与氮肥运筹对杂交稻根系生长及氮素利用的影响. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2015, 21 (1):23-35.
[19] 宋朝玉, 王圣健, 宫明波, 等. 小麦―玉米周年秸秆还田模式下氮肥利用特征的分析. 山东农业科学, 2020, 52(10):113-118.
[20] 郑顺安, 刘代丽, 章明奎, 等. 长期秸秆还田对污染农田土壤与农产品重金属的影响. 水土保持学报, 2020, 34(2):354-359.
[21] 马丽娜, 马俊祥, 王冬梅, 等. 秸秆还田与施氮量对盐碱粳稻区土壤养分及产量的影响. 吉林师范大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 42(4):134-140.
[22] 戴志刚, 鲁剑巍, 李晓坤, 等. 不同作物还田秸秆的养分释放特征试验. 农业工程学报, 2010, 26(6):272-276.
[23] 谢占军, 柳赟博, 韩瑛祚, 等. 秸秆还田条件下氮肥对玉米产量和土壤肥力的影响. 辽宁农业科学, 2021(2):31-33.
[24] 张珊, 石祖梁, 杨四军, 等. 施氮和秸秆还田对晚播小麦养分平衡和产量的影响. 应用生态学报, 2015, 26(9):2714-2720.
[25] 王学敏, 刘兴, 郝丽英, 等. 秸秆还田结合氮肥减施对玉米产量和土壤性质的影响. 生态学杂志, 2020, 39(2):507-516.
[26] 路怡青, 朱安宁, 张佳宝, 等. 免耕和秸秆还田对小麦生长期内土壤酶活性的影响. 生态与农村环境学报, 2013, 29(3):329-334.
[27] 宫秀杰, 钱春荣, 曹旭, 等. 玉米秸秆还田配施氮肥对土壤酶活、土壤养分及秸秆腐解率的影响. 玉米科学, 2020, 28(2):151-155.
[28] 刘玮斌, 田文博, 陈龙, 等. 不同秸秆还田方式对土壤酶活性和玉米产量的影响. 中国土壤与肥料, 2019, 283(5):25-29.
[29] 高日平, 刘小月, 杜二小, 等. 垄膜沟播与秸秆还田对内蒙古黄土高原玉米农田土壤水分、酶活性及产量的影响. 中国农业科技导报, 2021, 23(11):181-190.
[30] 叶盛嘉, 郑晨萌, 张影, 等. 氮肥减量配施有机肥对豫中地区冬小麦―夏玉米轮作生产力和土壤性质的影响. 中国生态农业学报, 2021, 30(6):900-912.
[31] 王金金, 刘小利, 刘佩, 等. 秸秆还田条件下减施氮肥对旱地冬小麦水氮利用、光合及产量的影响. 麦类作物学报, 2020, 40(2):210-219.
[32] 杨宪龙, 路永莉, 同延安, 等. 长期施氮和秸秆还田对小麦―玉米轮作体系土壤氮素平衡的影响. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2013, 19(1):65-73.
[1] Zheng Fei, Chen Jing, Cui Yakun, Kong Lingjie, Meng Qingchang, Li Jie, Liu Ruixiang, Zhang Meijing, Zhao Wenming, Chen Yanping. Screening of High and Stable Yield Maize Varieties Suitable for Grain Mechanical Harvesting in Different Ecological Areas of the Huaibei Region [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(4): 110-117.
[2] Zhang Mingwei, Ding Jinfeng, Zhu Xinkai, Guo Wenshan. Analysis of High-Yielding Planting Density and Nitrogen Application in Super-Late Sowing Wheat Following Rice [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(4): 126-135.
[3] Chen Jian, Qi Wen, Jiang Hailing, Qian Zhongcang. Effects of Broccoli Waste Composting on Seedling Quality and Yield of Rice [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(4): 136-143.
[4] Ding Kaixin, Wang Lichun, Tian Guokui, Wang Haiyan, Li Fengyun, Pan Yang, Pang Ze, Shan Ying. Review on the Response Reasearch of Potato Growth and PhysiologicalCharacteristics to Water Stress [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(4): 16-21.
[5] Wang Liping, Bai Lanfang, Wang Tianhao, Wang Xiaoxuan, Bai Yunhe, Wang Yufen. Effects of Different Nitrogen Levels on Nitrogen Accumulation and Transport in Silage Maize [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(4): 165-173.
[6] Li Yuxin, Lu Min, Zhao Jiuran, Wang Ronghuan, Xu Tianjun, Lü Tianfang, Cai Wantao, Zhang Yong, Xue Honghe, Liu Yueʼe. The Production Status Investigation and Analysis of Summer Maize in Beijing-Tianjin-Tangshan Region [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(4): 174-181.
[7] Le Lihong, Liu Kaili, Chen Zhongping, Wang Binqiang, Tang Zhou, Cheng Feihu, Zhang Kun. Effects of Application Time of N Fertilizer at Panicle Differentiation Stage on the Nitrogen Use Efficiencies, Yield and Quality of One-Season Indica-Japonica Hybrid Rice [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(4): 195-201.
[8] Liu Ying, Gu Yunyi, Zhang Weiyang, Yang Jianchang. Research Advances in the Effects of Water and Nitrogen and Their Interaction on the Grain Yield, Water and Nitrogen Use Efficiencies of Wheat [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(4): 7-15.
[9] Yuan Shuai, Chen Jiwang, Chen Pingping, Yi Zhenxie. Response of Yield and Cd Accumulation and Distribution in Main Crop and Ratooning Rice of Xiangzaoxian 45 to Irrigation Methods [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(3): 101-108.
[10] Zhang Guozhong, Li Juan, Li Yucai, Jin Shoulin, Hong Ruke, Huang Dajun, Pu Shihuang, Shi Congbo, Duan Zilin, Ma Di, Chen Lijuan. The Effects of Nitrogen Fertilizer Reduction and Transplanting Density on Yield and Eating Quality of Japonica Hybrid Rice Dianheyou 615 [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(3): 109-115.
[11] Ma Yihu, He Xianbiao, Chen Jian, Tang Xuejun, Wang Xuhui, He Haohao, Jin Yuqing, Qi Wen, Jiang Hailing, Zhou Cui. Effects of Seedling Ages on Grain Yield and Quality of High Quality Rice in Southeastern Zhejiang Province [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(3): 116-125.
[12] Zhao Yun, Feng Guojun, Hu Xiangwei, Wumaierjiang·Kuerban , Li Pengbing, Li Cuimei, Akebota·Muheyati . Preliminary Report on Selection of Herbicide-Resistant Foxtail Millet Varieties Suitable for Planting in Kashgar, Xinjiang [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(3): 126-133.
[13] Xing Pipeng, Huang Yanfeng, Yi Siyuan, Lan Rujian, Pan Shenggang, Mo Zhaowen, Tian Hua, Duan Meiyang, Tang Xiangru. Effects of Foliar Ornithine Spraying at Heading Stage on Yield, Quality and 2-Acetyl-1-Pyrroline Biosynthesis of Fragrant Rice [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(3): 134-138.
[14] Li Junzhi, Chang Xuhong, Wang Demei, Wang Yanjie, Yang Yushuang, Zhao Guangcai. Effects of Nitrogen Application Levels on Yield and Quality of Different Strong Gluten Wheat Varieties [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(3): 148-153.
[15] Song Chunyan, Wan Yunfan, Li Yu’e, Cai Andong, Hu Yanyan, Zhou Hui, Zhu Bo, Wang Bin. Relationships between Tiller Dynamic, Earbearing Tiller Rate and Yield of Double Cropping Rice under Elevated Temperature and CO2 Concentration [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(3): 159-166.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!