Crops ›› 2023, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (4): 165-173.doi: 10.16035/j.issn.1001-7283.2023.04.024

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Effects of Different Nitrogen Levels on Nitrogen Accumulation and Transport in Silage Maize

Wang Liping1,2(), Bai Lanfang1,2(), Wang Tianhao1,2, Wang Xiaoxuan1,2, Bai Yunhe1,2, Wang Yufen1,2()   

  1. 1College of Life Sciences, Inner Mongolia University, Hohhot 010070, Inner Mongolia, China
    2Key Laboratory of Herbage and Endemic Crop Biotechnology, Ministry of Education, Hohhot 010070, Inner Mongolia, China
  • Received:2022-01-14 Revised:2022-07-27 Online:2023-08-15 Published:2023-08-15

Abstract:

To clarify the rules of nitrogen accumulation and translocation of silage maize under different nitrogen levels, and to determine the optimal nitrogen application level for silage maize in central Inner Mongolia, Xianyu 335 was taken as an example and six nitrogen levels, 0 (N0), 120 (N8), 180 (N12), 240 (N16), 300 (N20), 360kg N/ha (N24), were set. We analyzed the nitrogen accumulation and transport characteristics of each treatment at different growth stages, as well as the whole plant yield and nitrogen fertilizer utilization efficiency under different nitrogen application conditions. The results showed that the accumulation of nitrogen in plant vegetative organs reached the peak from big flared stage to tasseling stage, and nitrogen was gradually transferred from vegetative organs to reproductive organs after tasseling stage. Different nitrogen levels had significant effects on plant nitrogen accumulation. Nitrogen accumulation under nitrogen application conditions were 87.13%-119.34% and 51.38%-68.48% in 2018 and 2019, respectively, higher than that without nitrogen application treatment. Nitrogen fertilizer increased the nitrogen transport capacity of vegetative organs, however, the nitrogen transport rate of each organ was reduced to some extent. In addition, nitrogen transport contributed to grains mainly from stems and leaves, and nitrogen application significantly promoted the accumulation of nitrogen in grains after anthesis. Nitrogen application could significantly improve the yield of silage maize, and in 2018 and 2019, the N20 and N16 treatments had the highest yields of 31.51t/ha and 27.09t/ha, respectively. The nitrogen use efficiency of all treatments showed a decreasing trend with the increase of nitrogen application rate. Comprehensive analysis showed that N16 treatment (240kg N/ha) was a suitable nitrogen application level in Hohhot, Inner Mongolia.

Key words: Silage maize, Xianyu 335, Nitrogen accumulation and transport, Yield, Nitrogen fertilizer utilization efficiency

Table 1

Variance analysis of nitrogen accumulation in the whole plant and each organ"

部位
Position
项目
Item
2018 2019
苗期
Seedling
stage
拔节期
Jointing
stage
大喇叭口期
Big flared
stage
抽雄期
Tasseling
stage
收获期
Harvest
stage
苗期
Seedling
stage
拔节期
Jointing
stage
大喇叭口期
Big flared
stage
抽雄期
Tasseling
stage
收获期
Harvest
stage
整株
Whole plant
F 4.04 4.55 21.07 36.59 35.58 10.81 8.16 21.41 9.73 9.15
P * * ** ** ** ** ** ** ** **
茎Stem F 2.40 7.70 15.67 9.91 20.40 6.02 16.69 17.52 64.25 2.52
P ns ** ** ** ** ** ** ** ** **
叶Leaf F 4.88 3.40 17.41 14.24 55.51 12.30 3.06 13.41 5.84 13.27
P * * ** ** ** ** * ** ** **
苞叶Bract F 22.23 8.42 9.84 1.72
P ** ** ** ns
果穗Ear F 9.91 20.41 2.18 7.08
P ** ** ns **
籽粒Grain F 19.40 9.15
P ** **
穗轴Cob F 88.95 2.22
P ** ns

Fig.1

Nitrogen accumulation of whole plant in silage maize under different nitrogen levels The different lowercase letters indicate significant difference at 0.05 level, the same below"

Table 2

The average accumulation rate of nitrogen in each growth period of the plant g/d"

处理
Treatment
2018 2019
苗期―拔节期
Seedling-
jointing stage
拔节期―
大喇叭口期
Jointing-
big flared stage
大喇叭口期―
抽雄期
Big flared-
tasseling stage
抽雄期―
收获期
Tasseling-
harvest stage
苗期―
拔节期
Seedling-
jointing stage
拔节期―
大喇叭口期
Jointing-
big flared stage
大喇叭口期―
抽雄期
Big flared-
tasseling stage
抽雄期―
收获期
Tasseling-
harvest stage
N0 0.02 0.01 0.06 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.06 0.01
N8 0.03 0.07 0.04 0.03 0.02 0.06 0.08 0.01
N12 0.04 0.07 0.04 0.03 0.02 0.06 0.07 0.02
N16 0.04 0.06 0.10 0.03 0.02 0.06 0.09 0.01
N20 0.05 0.07 0.08 0.04 0.04 0.07 0.06 0.01
N24 0.03 0.07 0.08 0.03 0.03 0.09 0.07 0.01

Fig.2

The accumulation of nitrogen in each organ of the plant at each growth stage From left to right: N0, N8, N12, N16, N20, N24"

Table 3

Distribution ratio of nitrogen accumulation in various organs under different nitrogen levels"

年份Year 处理
Treatment
植株氮素积累量
Plant nitrogen
accumulation (g)
籽粒氮素积累量
Grain nitrogen
accumulation (g)
收获期氮素在各器官的分配
Distribution ratio of nitrogen in various organs during harvest (%)
茎Stem 叶Leaf 苞叶Bract 籽粒Grain 穗轴Cob
2018 N0 2.37c 1.72b 7.96a 15.53bc 1.47c 72.33ab 2.71b
N8 4.31b 3.26a 6.72a 14.06c 1.63c 75.66a 1.94c
N12 4.43b 3.30a 6.63a 14.77c 1.70c 74.56a 2.34b
N16 5.01a 3.44a 7.79a 17.82ab 3.81a 68.66c 1.91c
N20 5.12a 3.53a 8.09a 17.16bc 4.18a 68.04c 2.52b
N24 4.54ab 3.15a 7.28a 19.77a 3.20ab 65.84c 3.71a
2019 N0 2.27b 1.65b 7.30a 13.72b 2.21a 72.57a 4.20a
N8 3.44a 2.47a 6.52a 17.07a 1.92ab 71.07a 2.78b
N12 3.63a 2.61a 7.34a 17.33a 1.33ab 71.89a 2.11c
N16 3.80a 2.69a 7.66a 17.92a 1.54ab 70.53a 2.35bc
N20 3.53a 2.53a 8.45a 16.26a 1.23b 71.55a 2.51bc
N24 3.83a 2.73a 7.18a 17.13a 2.03ab 71.31a 2.35bc

Table 4

Nitrogen transport status of vegetative organs under different nitrogen levels"

指标
Index
年份Year 器官
Organ
处理Treatment
N0 N8 N12 N16 N20 N24
氮素转移量Nitrogen transfer amount (g) 2018 0.19c 0.54b 0.54b 0.76a 0.52b 0.76a
0.49bc 0.60ab 0.81a 0.64ab 0.62ab 0.56ab
苞叶 0.14b 0.19ab 0.27a 0.17b 0.19ab 0.15b
总量 0.82c 1.33b 1.62a 1.57ab 1.33b 1.47ab
2019 0.19c 0.32b 0.32b 0.53a 0.35b 0.31b
0.76ab 0.70abc 0.46c 0.58bc 0.65abc 0.85a
苞叶 0.20d 0.36c 0.47ab 0.37bc 0.50a 0.49a
总量 1.15c 1.38abc 1.25bc 1.48abc 1.50ab 1.65a
氮素转运率nitrogen transfer rate (%) 2018 50.61b 65.04a 64.75a 66.07a 55.34b 68.72a
57.11a 49.88ab 54.76ab 41.77abc 40.71bc 37.26cd
苞叶 79.81a 72.79a 78.05a 47.43b 46.94b 49.62b
整株 58.11ab 57.56ab 60.99a 51.56bc 46.57c 50.49c
2019 52.38a 58.99a 54.18a 64.66a 54.58a 53.41a
70.90a 54.32bc 41.96c 45.59bc 53.37bc 55.92b
苞叶 80.04b 84.74ab 90.42a 86.48ab 91.90a 86.29ab
整株 68.58a 61.20ab 56.54b 58.98b 62.26ab 61.89ab
氮素转运对籽粒的贡献率
Contribution rate of nitrogen transport to grain (%)
2018 11.48cd 16.51b 16.33b 22.07a 14.81bc 24.52a
28.98a 18.49b 24.26ab 18.63b 17.47b 17.93b
苞叶 8.20a 5.75ab 8.04a 4.90b 5.46ab 4.88b
合计 48.66a 40.75a 48.63a 45.60a 37.74a 47.33a
2019 11.60b 13.45ab 12.18b 20.01a 14.69ab 11.44b
46.17a 28.58bc 17.89c 21.47bc 26.74bc 31.13b
苞叶 12.31b 14.80ab 18.05a 13.84b 20.52a 17.78a
合计 70.08a 56.83ab 48.12b 55.32ab 61.95ab 60.35ab
收获指数Harvest index (%) 2018 72.52b 75.66a 74.56a 68.66c 68.04c 65.84c
2019 72.57a 71.70a 71.89a 70.53a 71.55a 71.31a

Table 5

Plant yield and nitrogen utilization efficiency under different nitrogen levels"

年份Year 处理
Treatment
产量
Yield (t/hm2)
氮肥农学利用率
Nitrogen agronomic efficiency (%)
氮肥偏生产力
Nitrogen partial factor productivity (%)
氮肥吸收效率
Nitrogen absorption efficiency (%)
2018 N0 20.18b
N8 31.46a 94.00a 262.13a 2.69a
N12 28.18a 44.46b 156.54b 1.85b
N16 30.65a 43.65b 127.70c 1.57c
N20 31.51a 37.77b 105.02d 1.30d
N24 29.96a 27.17b 83.22e 0.99e
F 16.89 12.69 137.33 152.35
P ** ** ** **
2019 N0 21.31b
N8 25.55a 35.32a 212.88a 2.15a
N12 24.47ab 17.58a 135.95b 1.51b
N16 27.09a 24.08a 112.86c 1.19c
N20 25.71a 14.66a 85.69d 0.89d
N24 24.69ab 9.39a 68.58d 0.80d
F 2.35 1.69 65.61 43.12
P * ns ** **
[1] 唐贵, 隋冬华, 武新娟, 等. 我国青贮玉米饲用化研究进展. 黑龙江畜牧兽医, 2021(9):26-28,33.
[2] 张琴萍, 邢宝, 周帮伟, 等. 藜麦饲用研究进展与应用前景分析. 中国草地学报, 2020, 42(2):162-168.
[3] 张效梅, 乔治军, 李峰. 我国青贮玉米的研究现状及市场前景. 科技情报开发与经济, 2004(6):76-78.
[4] 张林, 周羽, 袁兆慧, 等. 我国青贮玉米生产现状及对策. 河南农业, 2020(35):58-59.
[5] Bell J F, Offer N W, Roberts D J. The effect on dairy cow performance of adding molasses sugar beet feed to immature forage maize at ensiling or prior to feeding. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 2007, 137(1/2):84-92.
doi: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2006.11.002
[6] Celebi S Z, Demir S, Celebi R, et al. The effect of Arbuscular Mycorrhizal Fungi (AMF) applications on the silage maize (Zea mays L.) yield in different irrigation regimes. European Journal of Soil Biology, 2010, 46(5):302-305.
doi: 10.1016/j.ejsobi.2010.06.002
[7] Schröder J J, Neeteson J J, Withagen C M, et al. Effects of N application on agronomic and environmental parameters in silage maize production on sandy soils. Field Crops Research, 1998, 58(1):55-67.
doi: 10.1016/S0378-4290(98)00086-0
[8] Abdelhadi L O, Santini F J. Corn silage versus grain sorghum silage as a supplement to growing steers grazing high quality pastures: Effects on performance and ruminal fermentation. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 2006, 127(1):33-43.
doi: 10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2005.08.010
[9] Santos G T D, Modesto E C, Souza E D, et al. Replacement of corn silage with cassava foliage silage in the diet of lactating dairy cows: Milk composition and economic evaluation. Brazilian Archives of Biology and Technology, 2009, 52:259-267.
[10] 倪印锋, 王明利. 中国青贮玉米产业发展时空演变及动因. 草业科学, 2019, 36(7):1915-1924.
[11] 臧贺藏, 王言景, 张杰, 等. 不同密氮模式下高产玉米品种籽粒产量与氮素利用特性研究. 华北农学报, 2017, 32(3):196-200.
doi: 10.7668/hbnxb.2017.03.030
[12] 米娜瓦尔·艾买提, 石强, 张晓宏, 等. 施氮量对复播青贮玉米产量、氮吸收利用及土壤硝态氮含量的影响. 新疆农业大学学报, 2018, 41(5):352-357.
[13] 刘佳敏, 汪洋, 褚旭, 等. 种植密度和施氮量对小麦―玉米轮作体系下周年产量及氮肥利用率的影响. 作物杂志, 2021(1):143-149.
[14] 于飞, 施卫明. 近10年中国大陆主要粮食作物氮肥利用率分析. 土壤学报, 2015, 52(6):1311-1324.
[15] 吕广德, 米勇, 陈永军, 等. 氮肥运筹对玉米干物质及氮素积累转运和产量的影响. 玉米科学, 2021, 29(1):128-137.
[16] 曾子豪, 袁静超, 张水梅, 等. 氮肥一次性基施与分次施用对春玉米氮素利用的差异. 玉米科学, 2021, 29(5):151-157,165.
[17] 张经廷, 刘云鹏, 李旭辉, 等. 夏玉米各器官氮素积累与分配动态及其对氮肥的响应. 作物学报, 2013, 39(3):506-514.
[18] 董越. 水氮互作对青贮玉米产量和水氮利用效率的影响研究. 保定:河北农业大学, 2021.
[19] 罗上轲, 刘婕, 叶开梅, 等. 覆膜方式与施氮量对春玉米产量、干物质和氮素积累与转运的影响. 玉米科学, 2020, 28(4):146-154,164.
[20] 王健, 韩金玲, 杨敏, 等. 不同氮高效玉米品种对氮素的吸收转运和代谢研究. 核农学报, 2020, 34(12):2800-2812.
doi: 10.11869/j.issn.100-8551.2020.12.2800
[21] 王泽林, 白炬, 李阳, 等. 氮肥施用和地膜覆盖对旱作春玉米氮素吸收及分配的影响. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2019, 25(1):74-84.
[22] 张峰, 高聚林, 王志刚, 等. 不同施氮量下高产春玉米氮素吸收、积累及利用效率的研究. 内蒙古农业科技, 2013(4):47-49.
[23] 何萍, 金继运, 林葆. 氮肥用量对春玉米叶片衰老的影响及其机理研究. 中国农业科学, 1998, 31(3):66-71.
[24] 受娜, 高玮, 沈禹颖, 等. 不同施氮量对青贮玉米产量及水分利用效率的影响. 草业科学, 2021, 38(7):1351-1361.
[25] 王宁, 刘玉春, 姜长松, 等. 不同灌水方式和施氮量对青贮玉米产量和水氮利用效率的影响. 水利与建筑工程学报, 2020, 18(4):20-24.
[26] 徐韶, 桑立君. 不同的耕作方式和施氮量对辽北地区玉米产量的影响研究. 农业技术与装备, 2020(6):11-12.
[27] 田晓婷. 阜新地区不同施氮量对玉米产量的影响研究. 现代农业, 2019(4):29.
[28] 刘志恒, 徐开未, 王科, 等. 不同施氮量对玉米产量及各器官养分积累的影响. 浙江大学学报(农业与生命科学版), 2018, 44(5):573-579.
[29] 张林, 武文明, 陈欢, 等. 氮肥运筹方式对土壤无机氮变化、玉米产量和氮素吸收利用的影响. 中国土壤与肥料, 2021, 294(4):126-134.
[30] 王怡针. 绿肥油菜还田时期和施氮量对玉米生长及氮肥利用的影响. 天津:天津农学院, 2021.
[1] Zheng Fei, Chen Jing, Cui Yakun, Kong Lingjie, Meng Qingchang, Li Jie, Liu Ruixiang, Zhang Meijing, Zhao Wenming, Chen Yanping. Screening of High and Stable Yield Maize Varieties Suitable for Grain Mechanical Harvesting in Different Ecological Areas of the Huaibei Region [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(4): 110-117.
[2] Zhang Mingwei, Ding Jinfeng, Zhu Xinkai, Guo Wenshan. Analysis of High-Yielding Planting Density and Nitrogen Application in Super-Late Sowing Wheat Following Rice [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(4): 126-135.
[3] Chen Jian, Qi Wen, Jiang Hailing, Qian Zhongcang. Effects of Broccoli Waste Composting on Seedling Quality and Yield of Rice [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(4): 136-143.
[4] Ding Kaixin, Wang Lichun, Tian Guokui, Wang Haiyan, Li Fengyun, Pan Yang, Pang Ze, Shan Ying. Review on the Response Reasearch of Potato Growth and PhysiologicalCharacteristics to Water Stress [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(4): 16-21.
[5] Li Yuxin, Lu Min, Zhao Jiuran, Wang Ronghuan, Xu Tianjun, Lü Tianfang, Cai Wantao, Zhang Yong, Xue Honghe, Liu Yueʼe. The Production Status Investigation and Analysis of Summer Maize in Beijing-Tianjin-Tangshan Region [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(4): 174-181.
[6] Le Lihong, Liu Kaili, Chen Zhongping, Wang Binqiang, Tang Zhou, Cheng Feihu, Zhang Kun. Effects of Application Time of N Fertilizer at Panicle Differentiation Stage on the Nitrogen Use Efficiencies, Yield and Quality of One-Season Indica-Japonica Hybrid Rice [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(4): 195-201.
[7] Liu Hongjie, Ren Dechao, Ni Yongjing, Ge Jun, Zhang Suyu, Lü Guohua, Hu Xin. Effects of Straw Returning and Reducing Nitrogen Application on Soil Nutrients, Enzyme Activities and Wheat Yield [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(4): 210-214.
[8] Liu Ying, Gu Yunyi, Zhang Weiyang, Yang Jianchang. Research Advances in the Effects of Water and Nitrogen and Their Interaction on the Grain Yield, Water and Nitrogen Use Efficiencies of Wheat [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(4): 7-15.
[9] Yuan Shuai, Chen Jiwang, Chen Pingping, Yi Zhenxie. Response of Yield and Cd Accumulation and Distribution in Main Crop and Ratooning Rice of Xiangzaoxian 45 to Irrigation Methods [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(3): 101-108.
[10] Zhang Guozhong, Li Juan, Li Yucai, Jin Shoulin, Hong Ruke, Huang Dajun, Pu Shihuang, Shi Congbo, Duan Zilin, Ma Di, Chen Lijuan. The Effects of Nitrogen Fertilizer Reduction and Transplanting Density on Yield and Eating Quality of Japonica Hybrid Rice Dianheyou 615 [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(3): 109-115.
[11] Ma Yihu, He Xianbiao, Chen Jian, Tang Xuejun, Wang Xuhui, He Haohao, Jin Yuqing, Qi Wen, Jiang Hailing, Zhou Cui. Effects of Seedling Ages on Grain Yield and Quality of High Quality Rice in Southeastern Zhejiang Province [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(3): 116-125.
[12] Zhao Yun, Feng Guojun, Hu Xiangwei, Wumaierjiang·Kuerban , Li Pengbing, Li Cuimei, Akebota·Muheyati . Preliminary Report on Selection of Herbicide-Resistant Foxtail Millet Varieties Suitable for Planting in Kashgar, Xinjiang [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(3): 126-133.
[13] Xing Pipeng, Huang Yanfeng, Yi Siyuan, Lan Rujian, Pan Shenggang, Mo Zhaowen, Tian Hua, Duan Meiyang, Tang Xiangru. Effects of Foliar Ornithine Spraying at Heading Stage on Yield, Quality and 2-Acetyl-1-Pyrroline Biosynthesis of Fragrant Rice [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(3): 134-138.
[14] Li Junzhi, Chang Xuhong, Wang Demei, Wang Yanjie, Yang Yushuang, Zhao Guangcai. Effects of Nitrogen Application Levels on Yield and Quality of Different Strong Gluten Wheat Varieties [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(3): 148-153.
[15] Song Chunyan, Wan Yunfan, Li Yu’e, Cai Andong, Hu Yanyan, Zhou Hui, Zhu Bo, Wang Bin. Relationships between Tiller Dynamic, Earbearing Tiller Rate and Yield of Double Cropping Rice under Elevated Temperature and CO2 Concentration [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(3): 159-166.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!