Crops ›› 2017, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (6): 72-78.doi: 10.16035/j.issn.1001-7283.2017.06.013

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Effects of Mulching Ways on Soil Hydro-Thermal Condition and Yield of Sunflowers on Rainfed Farmland

Jia Youyu1,Zhang Xiong2,Gao Yu1,Zhang Jian1,3,Ren Yongfeng1,Yin Xiulan2,Zhao Peiyi1,Diao Shengpeng1,3,Nie Jing1,Di Caixia1,An Hao1   

  1. 1Institute of Resources and Environment and Testing Technology,IMAAAHS/Inner Mongolia Key Laboratory of Dryland Farming/Scientific Observing and Experimental Station of Arable Land Conservation (Inner Mongolia),Ministry of Agriculture/Wuchuan Scientific Observing and Experimental Station of Agro- Environment,Ministry of Agriculture,Hohhot 010031,Inner Mongolia,China
    2Bureau of Agriculture and Animal Husbandry in Wuchuan County,Hohhot 011705,Inner Mongolia,China
    3College of Agronomy,Inner Mongolia Agricultural University,Hohhot 010019,Inner Mongolia,China;
  • Received:2017-07-21 Revised:2017-08-03 Online:2017-12-15 Published:2018-08-26
  • Contact: Peiyi Zhao

RichHTML

3

PDF (PC)

175

Abstract:

This study was conducted to explore soil hydrothermal condition, sunflower yield and soil wind erosion on rainfed farmland covered with plastic film mulching. The results showed that soil surface temperature had the order: full of mulching in spring > partially-mulching in autumn > partially-mulching in spring as well as full of mulching > partially-covered and ridge mulching > ditch mulching in spring. Accumulated temperature of soil for full of mulching in spring and partially-mulching in autumn were increased by 71.7℃ and 55.42℃, respectively in the whole study period, compared with partially-mulching in spring. Emergence time of sunflower were advanced by 3 days and 1 day, Florescence time were advanced by 2 days and 1 day, Flowering phase was prolonged 3 days and 1 day. The empty-percentage was reduced to 8.44% and 7.05%, yield increasing rate was 19.82% and 9.84%, respectively. The water consumption was reduced to 5.82% and 8.11%, Water use efficiency were improved to 2.70kg/(hm 2·mm) and 0.73kg/(hm 2·mm); partially-mulching in autumn could reduce soil wind erosion by 73.87% compared with without membrane. Mulching in autumn was more beneficial to reservoir of winter snow and spring rain, reducing the surface evaporation and soil wind erosion. In conclusion, full of mulching in spring and half-mulching in autumn could improve soil temperature and water conservation in soil, advance the emergence time, flowering time and extend the flowering phase, increase yields and water use efficiency of sunflower. Partially-mulching in autumn could reduce soil wind erosion.

Key words: Rainfed farmland, Mulching way, Mulching time, Hydrothermal conditions, Sunflower, Soil wind erosion

Fig.1

Soil temperature changes of different treatments in whole growth period"

Fig.2

Soil temperature changes before July"

Table 1

The pondage of 0-100cm soil horizon in each growth period mm"

处理
Treatment		 播种前
Pre-sowing		 苗期
Seedling stage		 现蕾期
Budding stage		 开花期
Flowering stage		 收获时
At harvest time		 作物耗水量
Crop water consumption
春季半覆膜Spring half membrane 86.32Bb 140.15Aa 103.65Abc 66.71Bb 102.58Cc 217.05Aa
秋季半覆膜Autumn half membrane 95.58Aa 139.79Aa 104.42Aab 65.42Bb 106.67Bb 212.22Ab
春季全覆膜Spring all membrane 86.32Bb 139.53Aa 106.43Aa 69.97Aa 114.62Aa 195.01Bc
降水量Amount of precipitation 0 31.68 24.37 42.67 87.11 -

Table 2

Seedling emergence time and seedling emergence rate of different treatments %"

出苗时间(月/日)
Seedling emergence time		 5/21 5/22 5/23 5/24 5/25 5/26 5/27 5/28 5/29 5/30 5/31 6/01 6/02 6/03 6/04 6/05 6/06 6/07 6/08
春季半覆膜
Spring half membrane		 0.0
 0.0
 0.0
 0.0
 7.5
 14.8
 23.2
 36.4
 53.8
 59.7
 66.2
 78.9
 85.9
 90.0
 91.7
 93.3
 95.0
 100
 100
秋季半覆膜
Autumn half membrane		 0.0
 0.0
 0.0
 5.4
 15.4
 23.1
 33.6
 53.6
 66.6
 70.6
 73.2
 78.4
 85.7
 86.9
 89.9
 90.4
 92.4
 100
 100
春季全覆膜
Spring all membrane		 0.0
 5.1
 7.2
 12.7
 14.0
 30.5
 39.5
 44.8
 57.3
 63.9
 71.7
 77.6
 83.5
 86.9
 91.1
 95.0
 98.3
 100
 100

Table 3

Flowering time and flowering rate of different treatments %"

开花时间(月/日)
Flowering time		 7/20 7/21 7/22 7/23 7/24 7/25 7/26 7/27 7/28 7/29 7/30 7/31 8/01 8/02 8/03 8/04 8/05
春季半覆膜
Spring half membrane		 0.0
 0.0
 0.0
 0.9
 1.2
 6.9
 15.3
 18.8
 22.4
 43.1
 55.4
 78.7
 90.3
 96.4
 99.1
 100.0
 100
秋季半覆膜
Autumn half membrane		 0.0
 0.0
 1.2
 2.3
 5.6
 10.6
 16.4
 22.5
 32.9
 43.8
 61.6
 88.3
 96.0
 98.4
 99.1
 100.0
 100
春季全覆膜
Spring all membrane		 0.0
 0.7
 3.3
 5.8
 17.6
 22.2
 40.8
 56.8
 67.3
 74.6
 81.3
 84.5
 94.3
 97.1
 98.6
 99.5
 100

Table 4

Growth index of different treatments"

处理
Treatment		 株高Plant height (cm) 单株叶面积Leaf area per plant (cm2) 单株干物质重Weight of dry matter per plant (g)
苗期
Seedling
stage		 现蕾期
Budding
stage		 开花期
Flowering
stage		 收获期
Harvest
stage		 苗期
Seedling
stage		 现蕾期
Budding
stage		 开花期
Flowering
stage		 苗期
Seedling
stage		 现蕾期
Budding
stage		 开花期
Flowering
stage		 收获期
Harvest
stage
春季半覆膜
Spring half membrane		 17.60Bb
 47.03Bc
 100.00Bb
 116.00Bb
 933.33Cc
 1 601.67Cc
 5 083.35Cc
 10.49Bc
 29.31Bb
 235.61Cc
 706.82Cc
秋季半覆膜
Autumn half membrane		 21.07Aa
 48.77Bb
 101.00Bb
 116.67Bb
 1 005.33Bb
 1 742.50Bb
 5 961.80Bb
 10.77ABb
 21.70Cc
 260.93Bb
 782.78Bb
春季全覆膜
Spring all membrane		 21.13Aa
 64.37Aa
 105.00Aa
 123.67Aa
 1 565.00Aa
 2 568.33Aa
 7 575.88Aa
 11.12Aa
 56.36Aa
 351.70Aa
 1 055.11Aa

Table 5

Yield characters of different treatments"

处理
Treatment		 花盘直径(cm)
Disc diameter		 茎粗(cm)
Stem diameter		 百粒重(g)
Hundred grain
weight		 产量(kg/hm2)
Yield		 增产率(%)
Yield increasing rate		 空秕率(%)
Empty abortive
rate		 水分利用效率
[kg/(hm2·mm)]
Water use efficiency
春季半覆膜
Spring half membrane		 17.80Aa
 5.93Bb
 5.55Bb
 1 966.8Cc
 -
 12.14Aa
 9.45Cc
秋季半覆膜
Autumn half membrane		 17.83Aa
 5.97Bb
 5.61Bb
 2 160.5Bb
 9.84
 5.09Bb
 10.18Bb
春季全覆膜
Spring all membrane		 18.20Aa
 6.40Aa
 6.02Aa
 2 356.8Aa
 19.82
 3.70Cc
 12.15Aa

Table 6

Effect of preventing for soil wind erosion by autumn half emebrance g/lap"

项目Item 对照
Control		 秋季半覆膜
Autumn half membrane
风蚀前干土重
Dry soil weight before wind erosion		 1 036.27
 1 036.27
重复1 Repeat 1 957.74 1 005.92
重复2 Repeat 2 989.36 1 037.48
重复3 Repeat 3 978.26 1 026.38
重复4 Repeat 4 977.42 1 025.54
重复5 Repeat 5 952.88 1 000.00
重复6 Repeat 6 978.95 1 029.07
重复7 Repeat 7 986.04 1 034.17
重复8 Repeat 8 960.05 1 008.14
重复9 Repeat 9 970.85 1 024.07
重复10 Repeat 10 952.70 999.87
均值Average 970.42 1 019.07
风蚀量Wind-blown mass 65.85 17.21
风蚀降低率(%)
Wind-blown decreasing amplitude		 -
 73.87
[1] 赵沛义, 妥德宝, 康暄 , 等. 阴山北麓残茬间作带田土壤风蚀规律. 水土保持学报, 2011,25(6):55-58.
[2] 赵举 . 阴山北麓农牧交错带风蚀荒漠化治理的保持耕作模式研究. 北京:中国农业大学, 2002.
[3] 赵沛义 . 作物残茬生物篱防治农田土壤风蚀及其影响机理研究—以阴山北麓农牧交错带为例. 呼和浩特:内蒙古农业大学, 2009.
doi: 10.7666/d.y1647874
[4] 樊小林, 廖宗文 . 地膜覆盖土壤水热效应及降解特性研究初报. 华南农业大学学报, 1990,20(1):121-122.
[5] 邹洪涛, 张玉龙, 黄毅 , 等. 东北风沙半干旱区雨水资源跨时调控对玉米生长发育及产量的影响. 土壤通报, 2008,39(4):852-854.
doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0564-3945.2008.04.031
[6] 张雷, 牛芬菊, 李小燕 , 等. 旱地全膜双垄沟播秋覆膜对玉米产量和水分利用率的影响. 中国农学通报, 2010,26(22):142-145.
[7] 牛芬菊, 张雷, 李小燕 , 等. 旱地全膜双垄沟播玉米秸秆还田对玉米生长及产量的影响. 干旱地区农业研究, 2014,32(3):161-165.
[8] 王勇, 宋尚有, 樊廷录 , 等. 黄土高原旱地秋季半覆膜及氮肥秋基春追比例对春玉米产量和品质的影响. 中国农业科学, 2012,45(3):460-470.
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2012.03.007
[9] 朱彦博, 程志斌 . 薄膜地面覆盖对土壤环境及春小麦生长发育的影响.甘肃农业科技, 1989(3):29-31.
[10] 何增国, 孙学保, 张多云 , 等. 古浪县山旱地马铃薯覆膜时期与播种方式对产量的影响.作物杂志, 2011(5):106-108.
[11] 王文智, 谭静, 朱玉德 . 半干旱山区秋季半覆膜马铃薯生产机械化技术模式初探. 中国农机化学报, 2014,35(4):73-76.
doi: 10.13733/j.jcam.issn.2095-5553.2014.04.019
[12] 张立功, 马淑珍 . 黄土丘陵区(庄浪)旱作马铃薯全膜覆盖关键技术集成研究. 干旱地区农业研究, 2014,32(5):84-92.
doi: 10.7606/j.issn.1000-7601.2014.05.015
[13] 金继运, 白由路, 杨俐苹 , 等. 高效土壤养分测试技术与设备.北京: 中国农业出版社, 2006: 75-79.
[14] 赵沛义, 妥德宝, 闫伟 , 等. 野外土壤风蚀定量观测方法的研究. 安徽农业科学, 2008,36(29):12810-12812.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0517-6611.2008.29.113
[15] 邹洪涛, 张玉龙, 黄毅 , 等. 辽西半干旱区秋后覆膜保墒对翌年春玉米生长发育的影响. 干旱地区农业研究, 2005,23(3):25-28.
[16] 刘晓伟, 何宝林, 郭天文 . 全膜双垄沟不同覆膜时期对玉米土壤水分和产量的影响. 核农学报, 2012,26(3):602-609.
[17] 陈恒洪, 柴守玺, 黄彩霞 , 等. 地膜覆盖对旱地春小麦土壤温度的影响. 甘肃农业大学学报, 2013,48(1):63-67.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-4315.2013.01.012
[18] 高绪科, 曾令文, 汪德水 , 等. 旱地春作农田不同耕作法效应的研究. 土壤通报, 1990,21(3):122-125.
[19] 王才斌, 成波, 郑亚萍 , 等. 温度对花生出苗、幼苗生长及开花的影响. 花生学报, 2003,32(4):7-11.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-4093.2003.04.001
[20] 徐文强, 杨祁峰, 牛芬菊 , 等. 秸秆还田与覆膜对土壤理化特性及玉米生长发育的影响. 玉米科学, 2013,21(3):87-93.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-0906.2013.03.017
[21] 范庆峰, 张玉龙, 黄毅 , 等. 覆膜方式对辽西旱地农田土壤水热及玉米出苗率的影响. 沈阳农业大学学报, 2012,43(4):467-471.
[22] 王翔宇, 丁国栋, 尚润阳 , 等. 秸秆、地膜覆盖控制农田土壤风蚀机理. 安徽农学通报, 2007,13(16):49-50,57.
[1] Miao Xu,Wenshou He,Kun Ma. Effects of Chemical and Organic Fertilizers on Yield and Quality of Oilseed Sunflower [J]. Crops, 2017, 33(5): 129-135.
[2] Jixia Liu,Junjian Shan,Yuanchun Ma,Baoan Zeng. Pathogenicity and Biological Characteristics of Verticillium wilt of Sunflower in Ningxia [J]. Crops, 2017, 33(4): 161-164.
[3] Yujie Wang,Baoyu Liu,Lei Zhou,Xiping Zhou,Shuangping Liu,Qi Wang,Jun Zhao,Hongyou Zhou. Improving the Control Ability of Anti-Cropping Agent on Sunflower Verticillium wilt [J]. Crops, 2017, 33(4): 155-160.
[4] Wenhao Wang,Hongyuan Zheng,Wenjun Liu,Lifen He,Yuxing Yan. Effects of Exogenous Nitric Oxide on Seed Germination and Seedling Growth of Sunflower [J]. Crops, 2017, 33(4): 169-172.
[5] Xiaoling She,Zijin Nie,Jing Zhao,Lin Li. Row Intercropping System of Purple Sweetpotato with Different Density’s Sunflower [J]. Crops, 2017, 33(1): 79-82.
[6] Wei Bai,Sumei Yang,Haifeng Yin,Tao Jin,Feng Li,Baoying Zhang,Jinli Cui. Influence of N P K Fertilizers on Yield and Benefit of Confectionary Sunflowers in Northwest of Hebei [J]. Crops, 2016, 32(5): 131-134.
[7] Weimin Chen,Jun Jing,Jiehua Wang,Fujie Ma,Yue Liang. Effects of Filming Plus Cryoprotectants for Preventing Sunflower White Rust,Black Stem Disease and Yield [J]. Crops, 2016, 32(3): 163-166.
[8] . [J]. Crops, 2013, 29(3): 29-31.
[9] . [J]. Crops, 2013, 29(3): 131-135.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] Guangcai Zhao,Xuhong Chang,Demei Wang,Zhiqiang Tao,Yanjie Wang,Yushuang Yang,Yingjie Zhu. General Situation and Development of Wheat Production[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 1 -7 .
[2] Baoquan Quan,Dongmei Bai,Yuexia Tian,Yunyun Xue. Effects of Different Leaf-Peg Ratio on Photosynthesis and Yield of Peanut[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 102 -105 .
[3] Xuefang Huang,Mingjing Huang,Huatao Liu,Cong Zhao,Juanling Wang. Effects of Annual Precipitation and Population Density on Tiller-Earing and Yield of Zhangzagu 5 under Film Mulching and Hole Sowing[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 106 -113 .
[4] Wenhui Huang, Hui Wang, Desheng Mei. Research Progress on Lodging Resistance of Crops[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 13 -19 .
[5] Yun Zhao,Cailong Xu,Xu Yang,Suzhen Li,Jing Zhou,Jicun Li,Tianfu Han,Cunxiang Wu. Effects of Sowing Methods on Seedling Stand and Production Profit of Summer Soybean under Wheat-Soybean System[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 114 -120 .
[6] Mei Lu,Min Sun,Aixia Ren,Miaomiao Lei,Lingzhu Xue,Zhiqiang Gao. Effects of Spraying Foliar Fertilizers on Dryland Wheat Growth and the Correlation with Yield Formation[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 121 -125 .
[7] Xiaofei Wang,Haijun Xu,Mengqiao Guo,Yu Xiao,Xinyu Cheng,Shuxia Liu,Xiangjun Guan,Yaokun Wu,Weihua Zhao,Guojiang Wei. Effects of Sowing Date, Density and Fertilizer Utilization Rate on the Yield of Oilseed Perilla frutescens in Cold Area[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 126 -130 .
[8] Pengjin Zhu,Xinhua Pang,Chun Liang,Qinliang Tan,Lin Yan,Quanguang Zhou,Kewei Ou. Effects of Cold Stress on Reactive Oxygen Metabolism and Antioxidant Enzyme Activities of Sugarcane Seedlings[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 131 -137 .
[9] Jie Gao,Qingfeng Li,Qiu Peng,Xiaoyan Jiao,Jinsong Wang. Effects of Different Nutrient Combinations on Plant Production and Nitrogen, Phosphorus and Potassium Utilization Characteristics in Waxy Sorghum[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 138 -142 .
[10] Na Shang,Zhongxu Yang,Qiuzhi Li,Huihui Yin,Shihong Wang,Haitao Li,Tong Li,Han Zhang. Response of Cotton with Vegetative Branches to Plant Density in the Western of Shandong Province[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 143 -148 .