Crops ›› 2023, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (3): 126-133.doi: 10.16035/j.issn.1001-7283.2023.03.017

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Preliminary Report on Selection of Herbicide-Resistant Foxtail Millet Varieties Suitable for Planting in Kashgar, Xinjiang

Zhao Yun1(), Feng Guojun1(), Hu Xiangwei1, Wumaierjiang·Kuerban 2, Li Pengbing3, Li Cuimei4, Akebota·Muheyati 1   

  1. 1Institute of Food Crops, Xinjiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Urumqi 830000, Xinjiang, China
    2Kuqa Upland Cotton Experimental Station, Xinjiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Kuqa 842000, Xinjiang, China
    3Anning Canal Comprehensive Test Site, Xinjiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Urumqi 830000, Xinjiang, China
    4Shule County Bureau of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Kashgar 844200, Xinjiang, China
  • Received:2022-01-26 Revised:2022-04-08 Online:2023-06-15 Published:2023-06-16

RichHTML

1

PDF (PC)

152

Abstract:

The correlation between agronomic traits and yield traits of foxtail millet varieties from different ecological regions were analyzed to explore the effects of main agronomic characteristics on yield, excavate new foxtail millet varieties suitable for resowing in southern Xinjiang with early maturity, high yield, high quality and herbicide resistance. In 2019-2020, 13 varieties from different ecological regions were used as materials, using correlation analysis, twelve agronomic traits related to yield were comprehensively evaluated. The results showed that the growth period of each variety was between 78-109d, the six varieties tested had a growing period ≤88d (Yugu 18, CK); seven varieties showed excellent comprehensive traits for two consecutive years, the yields was stable, and significantly higher than that of CK. Panicle weight, panicle grain weight and number of panicles were positively correlated with yield; the effects of eight agronomic traits on millet yield were panicle weight > panicle grain weight > number of panicles > growth period > number of plants > panicle diameter > panicle length > plant height, which indicated that panicle traits should be paid attention to in screening of herbicide-resistant foxtail millet varieties, followed by growth period and plant height. Through comprehensive evaluation, five herbicide resistant varieties ‘Yugu 32’, ‘Chigu K1’, ‘Jizajinmiao’, ‘Yugu 31’ and ‘Jigu 41’ were selected to be suitable for planting in southern Xinjiang.

Key words: Herbicide-resistant foxtail millet, Resowing, Yield, Agronomic traits, Correlation

Table 1

Names and sources of tested foxtail millet varieties"

编号Code 品种Variety 抗除草剂类型Type of herbicide resistance 来源Source
JG39 冀谷39 咪唑乙烟酸 河北省农林科学院谷子研究所
JG41 冀谷41 拿捕净 河北省农林科学院谷子研究所
JG42 冀谷42 拿捕净 河北省农林科学院谷子研究所
JM 冀杂金苗 拿捕净 河北省农林科学院谷子研究所
YG31 豫谷31 拿捕净 安阳市农业科学院
YG32 豫谷32 拿捕净 安阳市农业科学院
CGK1 赤谷K1 拿捕净 赤峰市农业科学院
HG11 衡谷11 拿捕净 河北省农林科学院旱作农业研究所
HG36 衡谷36 拿捕净 河北丰苑种业有限公司
SFZG1 S丰杂谷1号 拿捕净 河北丰苑种业有限公司
JG14 九谷14 不抗除草剂 吉林省农业科学院
ZG2 中谷2号 不抗除草剂 中国农业科学院作物科学研究所
YG18 豫谷18 不抗除草剂 安阳市农业科学院

Table 2

"

年份
Year		 品种
Variety		 播种期
Sowing		 出苗期
Emergence		 抽穗期
Heading		 成熟期
Maturity		 播种―出苗
Sowing-emergence (d)		 出苗―抽穗
Emergence-heading (d)		 抽穗―成熟
Heading-ripening (d)		 生育期
Growth period (d)
2019 JG39 06-25 06-30 08-25 10-01 5 56 37 93
JG41 06-25 06-30 08-22 09-27 5 53 36 89
JG42 06-25 06-30 08-27 10-12 5 58 46 104
JM 06-25 06-30 08-20 09-22 5 51 33 84
YG31 06-25 06-30 08-21 09-27 5 52 37 89
YG32 06-25 06-30 08-23 09-27 5 54 35 89
CGK1 06-25 06-30 08-20 09-21 5 51 32 83
HG11 06-25 06-30 08-24 10-01 5 55 38 93
HG36 06-25 07-02 08-27 10-13 7 56 47 103
SFZG1 06-25 06-30 08-27 10-01 5 58 35 93
JG14 06-25 06-30 08-14 09-21 5 45 38 83
ZG2 06-25 06-30 08-25 10-06 5 56 42 98
YG18 06-25 06-30 08-24 09-28 5 55 35 90
2020 JG39 06-27 07-02 08-27 10-03 5 56 37 93
JG41 06-27 07-03 08-24 10-01 5 52 38 90
JG42 06-27 07-02 08-29 10-12 5 58 44 102
JM 06-27 07-04 08-22 09-24 5 49 33 82
YG31 06-27 07-01 08-23 09-29 5 53 37 90
YG32 06-27 07-02 08-25 09-29 5 54 35 89
CGK1 06-27 07-03 08-22 09-23 5 50 32 82
HG11 06-27 07-04 08-26 10-03 5 53 38 91
HG36 06-27 07-03 08-29 10-13 7 57 45 102
SFZG1 06-27 07-01 08-29 10-03 5 59 35 94
JG14 06-27 07-02 08-16 09-23 5 45 38 83
ZG2 06-27 07-03 08-27 10-07 5 55 41 96
YG18 06-27 07-02 08-26 10-01 5 55 36 91

Table 3

Plant traits of different herbicide resistant foxtail millet varieties after resowing"

年份
Year		 品种
Variety		 株高
Plant height (cm)		 节数
Number of nodes		 茎基粗
Stem base thickness (mm)		 叶长
Leaf length (cm)		 叶宽
Leaf width (cm)
2019 JG39 107.24cde 11.90a 9.72b 36.17cd 2.71bcd
JG41 116.28def 12.76a 8.84ab 32.67bc 2.66bcd
JG42 92.72g 12.24a 11.48a 37.50a 3.05a
JM 107.04cd 12.23a 9.02ab 30.77cd 2.62cd
YG31 100.17g 12.02a 9.63b 35.73d 2.68bcd
YG32 98.86def 12.65a 9.19bc 29.53d 2.29e
CGK1 104.62c 12.28a 9.04c 29.80e 2.76d
HG11 96.74efg 12.14a 9.82ab 33.10cd 3.02d
HG36 98.94def 12.74a 11.04ab 36.01a 2.87abc
SFZG1 103.58a 13.13a 9.38bc 37.10b 2.89ab
JG14 119.72b 12.69a 8.30bc 25.68f 2.79f
ZG2 95.52fg 12.44a 10.14b 33.87bcd 2.65bcd
YG18 99.81def 12.29a 9.78ab 36.80cd 2.87d
2020 JG39 109.04bc 12.34a 9.88bc 31.41ab 2.07a
JG41 114.69ab 11.68a 9.71bc 30.97de 2.47ab
JG42 95.56e 11.88a 11.34a 37.43a 2.95ab
JM 106.93bc 11.94a 8.80cd 30.19cde 2.45ab
YG31 101.14de 11.72a 9.38cd 29.51abc 2.92ab
YG32 104.23cde 11.89a 9.11bc 32.05cde 2.08ab
CGK1 103.81cde 12.43a 8.17d 26.79e 2.50ab
HG11 110.65bc 12.33a 9.84bc 31.64abc 2.55ab
HG36 100.38de 12.19a 10.24b 34.08a 2.84ab
SFZG1 101.14de 12.38a 9.26bc 36.12b 2.74ab
JG14 119.33a 12.54a 8.01d 22.07f 2.09b
ZG2 100.02de 12.23a 10.09bc 31.45bcd 2.49ab
YG18 105.17cd 12.04a 9.64bc 30.21ab 2.59ab

Table 4

Panicle characters of different herbicide-resistant foxtail millet varieties"

年份
Year		 品种
Variety		 穗长
Ear length (cm)		 穗粗
Ear diameter (mm)		 穗粒重
Grain weight per panicle (g)		 出谷率
Output rate of valley (%)		 穗松紧
Ear tightness		 穗型
Panicle type
2019 JG39 17.93ab 23.26b 10.75ab 83.59a 中紧 纺锤形
JG41 18.91ab 25.68a 14.33a 84.52a 适中 纺锤形
JG42 19.45ab 19.17b 13.53bc 83.24a 适中 纺锤形
JM 18.81ab 26.58b 16.00abc 85.03a 适中 纺锤形
YG31 19.73a 25.87b 11.43bc 84.69a 适中 纺锤形
YG32 18.45ab 28.41b 19.80bc 82.83a 适中 纺锤形
CGK1 19.21d 21.82b 14.78bc 84.60a 中紧 纺锤形
HG11 18.99ab 25.02b 14.02bc 82.64a 适中 纺锤形
HG36 17.17bc 21.86b 14.86bc 79.16a 适中 纺锤形
SFZG1 20.03a 21.23b 13.23c 76.67a 适中 纺锤形
JG14 15.86cd 22.20b 15.79bc 81.70a 适中 纺锤形
ZG2 19.09ab 23.30b 16.23abc 84.34a 适中 纺锤形
YG18 18.35ab 23.72b 13.42bc 80.84a 适中 纺锤形
2020 JG39 17.91bcd 17.21abc 8.33c 85.40 a 中紧 纺锤形
JG41 17.04cde 23.72abc 12.76b 82.56a 适中 纺锤形
JG42 17.99bcd 16.67abc 13.16b 83.12a 适中 纺锤形
JM 18.18bcd 22.59bc 14.67ab 85.08a 适中 纺锤形
YG31 20.83a 18.17a 9.83c 91.23a 适中 纺锤形
YG32 19.49abc 24.05abc 17.78a 86.45a 适中 纺锤形
CGK1 15.99de 17.47c 8.33c 88.20a 中紧 纺锤形
HG11 20.49ab 14.47ab 10.87b 82.40a 适中 纺锤形
HG36 18.15bcd 17.16c 12.08b 79.33a 适中 纺锤形
SFZG1 19.72a 18.36c 11.21b 85.09a 适中 纺锤形
JG14 15.35e 19.92bc 11.79b 85.45a 适中 纺锤形
ZG2 18.76abc 22.70bc 14.71ab 85.42a 适中 纺锤形
YG18 20.27ab 18.42abc 11.24b 84.57a 适中 纺锤形

Fig.1

Differences in number of plants and panicles of foxtail millet varieties with different herbicide resistance Different letters indicated significant difference between varieties (P < 0.05), the same below"

Fig.2

Biomass per plant of foxtail millet varieties with different herbicide resistance after resowing"

Fig.3

Yield of foxtail millet varieties with different herbicide resistance after resowing"

Table 5

Correlation coefficients of herbicide resistant foxtail millet varieties with different resowing"

年份
Year		 指标
Index		 产量
Yield		 穗长
Ear length		 穗粗
Ear diameter		 穗重
Panicle weight		 穗粒重
Spike grain weight		 株数
Number of plants		 成穗数
Number of panicles		 生育期
Growth period
2019 穗长 -0.272
穗粗 0.233 0.661*
穗重 0.962* 0.250 0.786**
穗粒重 0.558* 0.084 0.387 0.416
株数 0.384 -0.023 0.457 -0.587* -0.323
穗数 0.730** -0.616* 0.077 0.146 0.844** 0.598*
生育期 0.555 0.230 -0.007 0.094 -0.346 0.249 0.344
株高 -0.447 -0.313 -0.381 -0.505 -0.139 -0.044 -0.230 0.609
2020 穗长 -0.280
穗粗 0.309 0.695*
穗重 0.839* 0.533 0.738*
穗粒重 0.782** 0.016 0.003 0.176
株数 0.418 -0.285 0.448 -0.373 -0.549
穗数 0.730** -0.660* 0.122 0.036 0.965** 0.671*
生育期 0.534 0.034 -0.153 0.350 -0.692 0.046 0.636
株高 -0.491 -0.441 -0.074 -0.232 -0.341 -0.114 -0.357 0.573
[1] Yan J, Zhang N, Kang F, et al. Cultivar replacement increases water use efficiency in foxtail millet in Shaanxi province, China. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry, 2021, 164(4):73-81.
doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2021.04.036
[2] 程汝宏, 张婷, 王根平, 等. 新中国成立以来谷子育种的主要研究进展. 粮油食品科技, 2022, 30(4):68-75,10.
[3] 郑宝东. 改善人们膳食结构的谷物杂粮. 农产品加工, 2009(1):18-19.
[4] 王海滨, 夏建新. 小米的营养成分及产品研究开发进展. 粮食科技与经济, 2010, 35(4):36-38,46.
[5] 郝洪波, 崔海英, 李明哲. 粮饲兼用型谷子新品种衡饲1号的选育. 河北农业科学, 2016, 20(5):7-10.
[6] 王增法, 王春梅, 时兴军. 粮草双优双高产的饲料作物—谷稗. 养殖技术顾问, 2001(5):16.
[7] 李璐, 勾玲, 薛军, 等. 喀什地区复播玉米品种生态适应性研究. 新疆农业科学, 2015, 52(2):203-209.
[8] 周琰, 冯国郡. 南疆林果田复播谷子技术. 农村科技, 2016(2):21-22.
[9] 李龙, 李俊献, 曲婷, 等. 乡村振兴背景下安阳市谷子产业发展面临的问题和对策. 农业科技通讯, 2022(9):11-12,150.
[10] 周琰, 张叶亭. 泽普县复播谷子栽培技术. 现代农业科技, 2016(2):29-30.
[11] 张海金, 陈国秋, 谭国奉. 抗除草剂简化栽培型谷子品种朝谷58的选育及配套栽培技术研究. 安徽农业科学, 2015, 43(8):69-71.
[12] 王天宇, 赵治海. 谷子抗除草剂基因从栽培种向其近缘野生种漂移的研究. 作物学报, 2001, 27(6):681-687.
[13] Jia X P, Dong P H, Zhang H X, et al. Correlation study of lodging resistance and plant height, panicle traits in foxtail millet. Journal of Plant Genetic Resources, 2015, 16(6):1188-1193.
[14] 李振玉. 谷子考种方法的探索及应用. 现代农业, 2014(9):50.
[15] 刘寒双, 崔纪菡, 刘猛, 等. 有机肥替代部分化肥对谷子产量、土壤养分及酶活性的影响. 中国土壤与肥料, 2022, 303(7):71-81.
[16] 屈洋, 宋慧, 刘洋, 等. 谷子新品种(系)主要农艺性状及茎杆特性的遗传多样性分析. 干旱地区农业研究, 2018, 36(3):71-81.
[17] 庞毓东. 浅谈玉米育种生育期选育方向的选择. 南方农业, 2017, 11(21):123-124.
[18] 朱明哲, 杨蕊, 段红. 小麦新品种产量性状及主要品质性状的因子分析与聚类分析. 河南科技学院学报(自然科学版), 2012, 40(1):1-7.
[19] 钱建南, 丁颖, 李玉杨, 等. 14个水稻品种产量与农艺性状的灰色关联度分析. 大麦与谷类科学, 2022, 39(5),37-41.
[20] 贾小平, 董普辉, 张红晓, 等. 谷子抗倒伏性和株高、穗部性状的相关性研究. 植物遗传资源学报, 2015, 16(6):1188-1193.
[21] 白玉婷, 李强, 高志军, 等. 春播夏谷子品系农艺性状的相关性和聚类分析. 分子植物育种, 2020, 18(7):2338-2351.
[22] 孟庆立, 关周博, 冯佰利, 等. 谷子抗旱相关性状的主成分与模糊聚类分析. 中国农业科学, 2009, 42(8):2667-2675.
[23] 解云, 郭世华. 谷子品种农艺性状的灰色关联度分析及综合评价. 分子植物育种, 2021, 19(6):2064-2672.
[24] 赵禹凯, 王显瑞, 陈高勋, 等. 谷子主要农艺性状的相关和通径分析. 内蒙古农业大学学报(自然科学版), 2014, 35(2):35-38.
[25] 王丹丹, 希日格乐, 孙宇燕, 等. 谷子农艺性状相关性与食味品质分析. 内蒙古农业大学学报:自然科学版, 2015, 36(4):29-37.
[26] 杨慧卿, 王军, 袁峰, 等. 西北春谷区中晚熟组谷子主要农艺性状的相关和通径分析. 河北农业科学, 2010, 14(11):105-106,111.
[27] 屈洋, 马雯, 王可珍, 等. 种植方式和密度对谷子光合性能和产量的影响. 干旱地区农业研究, 2022, 40(2):52-58,128.
[1] Yuan Shuai, Chen Jiwang, Chen Pingping, Yi Zhenxie. Response of Yield and Cd Accumulation and Distribution in Main Crop and Ratooning Rice of Xiangzaoxian 45 to Irrigation Methods [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(3): 101-108.
[2] Zhang Guozhong, Li Juan, Li Yucai, Jin Shoulin, Hong Ruke, Huang Dajun, Pu Shihuang, Shi Congbo, Duan Zilin, Ma Di, Chen Lijuan. The Effects of Nitrogen Fertilizer Reduction and Transplanting Density on Yield and Eating Quality of Japonica Hybrid Rice Dianheyou 615 [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(3): 109-115.
[3] Ma Yihu, He Xianbiao, Chen Jian, Tang Xuejun, Wang Xuhui, He Haohao, Jin Yuqing, Qi Wen, Jiang Hailing, Zhou Cui. Effects of Seedling Ages on Grain Yield and Quality of High Quality Rice in Southeastern Zhejiang Province [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(3): 116-125.
[4] Xing Pipeng, Huang Yanfeng, Yi Siyuan, Lan Rujian, Pan Shenggang, Mo Zhaowen, Tian Hua, Duan Meiyang, Tang Xiangru. Effects of Foliar Ornithine Spraying at Heading Stage on Yield, Quality and 2-Acetyl-1-Pyrroline Biosynthesis of Fragrant Rice [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(3): 134-138.
[5] Wang Shuoli, Ding Songshuang, Wang Ronghao, Li Linlin, Wu Chuang, Wang Jian, Shi Xiangdong. Difference and Correlation Analysis of Mineral Element Contents and Sensory Qualities between Yunnan Province of China and Nicaragua Cigar Tobacco Leaves [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(3): 139-147.
[6] Li Junzhi, Chang Xuhong, Wang Demei, Wang Yanjie, Yang Yushuang, Zhao Guangcai. Effects of Nitrogen Application Levels on Yield and Quality of Different Strong Gluten Wheat Varieties [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(3): 148-153.
[7] Song Chunyan, Wan Yunfan, Li Yu’e, Cai Andong, Hu Yanyan, Zhou Hui, Zhu Bo, Wang Bin. Relationships between Tiller Dynamic, Earbearing Tiller Rate and Yield of Double Cropping Rice under Elevated Temperature and CO2 Concentration [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(3): 159-166.
[8] Xu Qian, Zeng Xinyu, Xiao Bo, Li Baozheng, Zhang Xingduan. Effects of Foliar Fertilizer on Yield and Quality of Shoot Tip in Leaf-Vegetable Sweet Potato [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(3): 183-187.
[9] Jia Guotao, Wang Xiaoyu, Sun Yiming, Nie Cong, He Jingyu, Feng Yingjie, Ma Shengtao, Cui Ting, Cheng Dongxu, Yao Qian, Li Yue, Zhang Ziying, Wang Baolin, Liu Huimin. Analysis on the Relationship between Contents of Free Amino Acids and the Quality of Flue-Cured Tobacco in Eight Flavor Ecological Regions of China [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(3): 195-199.
[10] Guo Shulei, Wang Ying, Wei Liangming, Zhang Xin, Liu Yan, Wu Weihua, Lu Daowen, Lei Xiaobing, Wang Zhenhua, Lu Xiaomin. Analysis of Influencing Factors of Maize Yield under Different Ecological Conditions [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(3): 205-214.
[11] Lu Yingji, Yang Xiaomeng, Pu Xiaoying, Li Xia, Yang Liʼe, Yang Yanbin, Zeng Yawen. Effects of Sowing and Seedling Cutting in Different Seasons on Agronomic Characteristics of Superior Barley Varieties [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(3): 215-220.
[12] Luo Siwei, Shi Xiunan, Jia Yonghong, Zhang Jinshan, Wang Kai, Li Dandan, Wang Runqi, Dong Yanxue, Shi Shubing. Effects of Drip Irrigation Capillary Spacing and Drop Spacing on Photosynthesis, Dry matter Accumulation, and Yield Formation of Uniformly Sown Winter Wheat [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(3): 230-237.
[13] Shao Yang, Guo Yanping, Min Gengmei, Yang Xiaoming. Effects of Different Functional Herbicides on the Growth of Broad Bean and Field Weeds [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(3): 254-259.
[14] Zhang Haibin, Wu Xiaohua, Yu Meiling, Wang Xiaobing, Ye Jun, Cui Siyu, Li Yuanqing, Wang Zhanxian, Zhang Hongxu, Xue Wei, Li Yan, Cui Guohui, Zhao Xuanwei, Liu Juan. AMMI Model Analysis of Grain Yield of Wheat Varieties (Lines) in Inner Mongolia Regional Trials [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(3): 27-34.
[15] Li Jing, Li Pengcheng, He Yongbin, Xing Yaling, Meng Fanhua, Zhou Qian, Nan Ming. Multivariate Analysis and Comprehensive Evaluation of Main Characteristics of 16 Russian Winter Wheat Varieties [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(3): 58-65.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!