Crops ›› 2023, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (3): 254-259.doi: 10.16035/j.issn.1001-7283.2023.03.035

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Effects of Different Functional Herbicides on the Growth of Broad Bean and Field Weeds

Shao Yang1(), Guo Yanping1, Min Gengmei2(), Yang Xiaoming2   

  1. 1Linxia Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Linxia 731100, Gansu, China
    2Institute of Crop Sciences, Gansu Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Lanzhou 730070, Gansu, China
  • Received:2022-03-25 Revised:2023-02-09 Online:2023-06-15 Published:2023-06-16

Abstract:

In order to investigate the effects of various herbicides applied in different periods on seedling emergence, teratogenicity, yield formation and field control efficiency of broad bean, taking Lincan 6 and different functional herbicides as materials, the safety, effectiveness and yield relationship of herbicide were investigated. The results showed that herbicide had significant effects on yield formation of Lincan 6. Pendimethalin had the least effects on emergence and teratogenicity of broad bean seedlings, while bentazone and 5% quizalofop-p-ethyl as stem and leaf herbicides had the least teratogenicity of broad bean seedlings. Spraying trifluralin and pendimethalin before sowing increased yield by 7.9% and 2.6%, respectively, and spraying bentazone and 10% quizalofop-p-ethyl at stem and leaf stage increased yield by 7.9% and 5.3%, respectively. Although s-metolachlor, acetochlor and 15% quizalofop-p-ethyl had the highest plant control effect, they had higher teratogenicity to broad bean seedlings, which was not conducive to production. The application of herbicide after sowing was also detrimental to yield formation. The results showed that pendimethalin and trifluralin were better as pre-sowing herbicides, bentazone and 10% quizalofop-p-ethyl were better as stem and leaf herbicides of broad bean.

Key words: Herbicides, Broad beans, Teratogenicity, Yield, Control effect

Table 1

Herbicide types and application concentrations"

除草剂种类
Herbicide type
浓度
Concentration (%)
施用时间
Application period
金都儿S-met 96 播前/播后
二甲戊灵Pend 33 播前/播后
氟乐灵Trif 48 播前
乙草胺Acet 90 播后
灭草松Bent 48 茎叶
高效盖草能Halo 11 茎叶
精喹禾灵Quiz 5、10和15 茎叶
氟磺胺草醚Fome 25 茎叶

Fig.1

Effects of herbicide at seedling stage on emergence and teratogenicity of broad bean Different lowercase letters indicate significant difference at the 0.05 level, the same below"

Fig.2

Effects of stem and leaf herbicide on seedling emergence and teratogenicity of broad bean"

Table 2

Effects of herbicide spraying on growth and yield of broad bean seven days before sowing"

处理
Treatment
株高
Plant height (cm)
分枝数
Number of branches
单株荚数
Pods number per plant
产量(kg/小区)
Yield (kg/plot)
CK 64.7±0.6a 1.0±0.0a 6.9±0.2ab 3.8±0.2a
金都儿S-met 42.3±7.1b 0.8±0.2a 6.2±0.5b 3.0±0.2b
二甲戊灵Pend 54.7±2.9a 1.1±0.1a 7.5±0.6a 3.9±0.3a
氟乐灵Trif 60.0±2.0a 1.1± 0.1a 7.4±0.2a 4.1±0.2a

Table 3

Effects of herbicide spraying on growth and yield of broad bean seven days after sowing"

处理
Treatment
株高
Plant height (cm)
分枝数
Number of branches
单株荚数
Pods number per plant
产量(kg/小区)
Yield (kg/plot)
CK 64.7±0.6a 1.0±0.0ab 6.9±0.2b 3.8±0.2a
金都儿S-met 53.7±3.8a 0.9±0.1b 8.0±0.4a 3.6±0.9a
二甲戊灵Pend 64.7±6.1a 1.2±0.0a 7.5±0.3a 3.7±1.1a
乙草胺Acet 56.3±5.8a 0.9±0.2b 7.9±0.3a 3.3±1.4a

Table 4

Effects of stem and leaf herbicide on growth and yield of broad bean"

处理
Treatment
株高
Plant height (cm)
分枝数
Number of branches
单株荚数
Pods number per plant
产量(kg/小区)
Yield (kg/plot)
CK 64.7±0.6a 1.0±0.0ab 6.9±0.2ab 3.8±0.2ab
灭草松Bent 65.0±6.1a 0.9±0.2ab 8.7±0.8a 4.1±0.6a
高效盖草能Halo 66.3±4.9a 1.2±0.2a 7.2±0.9ab 3.2±0.7bc
5%精喹禾灵5 % Quiz 60.3±6.8a 0.9±0.1ab 7.2±0.7ab 3.4±0.4abc
10%精喹禾灵10 % Quiz 66.3±6.7a 1.0±0.2ab 8.7±0.6a 4.0±0.2a
15%精喹禾灵15% Quiz 64.3±4.9a 0.9±0.1ab 6.4±0.5b 3.5±0.2abc
氟磺胺草醚Fome 71.0±8.2a 0.7±0.1b 6.3±0.9b 3.0±0.2c

Fig.3

Effects of herbicide on weed quantity and quality seven days before sowing"

Table 5

Control effects of herbicide on weeds in field seven days before sowing %"

处理
Treatment
株防效
Plant control effect
鲜重防效
Fresh weight control effect
CK - -
金都儿S-met 78.5 84.5
二甲戊灵Pend 86.1 82.7
氟乐灵Trif 70.1 82.3

Fig.4

Effects of herbicide on weed quantity and quality seven days after sowing"

Table 6

Control effects of herbicide on weeds in field seven days after sowing %"

处理
Treatment
株防效
Plant control effect
鲜重防效
Fresh weight control effect
CK - -
金都儿S-met 94.4 88.3
二甲戊灵Pend 77.8 66.1
乙草胺Acet 93.1 89.1

Fig.5

Effects of stem and leaf herbicide on weed quantity and fresh weight"

Table 7

Control effects of stem and leaf herbicide on weeds in field %"

处理
Treatment
株防效
Plant control
effect
鲜重防效
Fresh weight
control effect
CK - -
灭草松Bent 18.8 58.1
高效盖草能Halo 31.9 54.6
5%精喹禾灵5% Quiz 13.2 22.6
10%精喹禾灵10% Quiz 38.2 57.0
15%精喹禾灵15% Quiz 41.7 68.8
氟磺胺草醚Fome 31.2 39.5
[1] Cazzato E, Tufarelli V, Ceci E, et al. Quality,yield and nitrogen fixation of faba bean seeds as affected by sulphur fertilization. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica. Section B,Soil and Plant Science, 2012, 62(8):732-738.
[2] Maalouf F, Hu J G, OʼSullivan D M, et al. Breeding and genomics status in faba bean (Vicia faba). Plant Breeding, 2019, 138(4):465-473.
doi: 10.1111/pbr.12644
[3] 谭洪卓, 谭斌, 田晓红, 等. 20种中国蚕豆的化学组成、物理特性及其相互关系. 中国粮油学报, 2009, 24(12):153-157,166.
[4] 候慧芝, 张绪成, 汤瑛芳, 等. 半干旱区全膜覆盖垄沟种植马铃薯/蚕豆间作的产量和水分效应. 草业学报, 2016, 25(6):71-80.
[5] 张旭红, 高艳玲, 林爱军, 等. 重金属污染土壤接种丛枝菌根真菌对蚕豆毒性的影响. 环境工程学报, 2008, 2(2):274-278.
[6] 漆文选. 高寒二阴区鲜食春蚕豆主要病虫害调查与防治. 中国蔬菜, 2021(1):117-122.
[7] 黄家会, 胡志良, 蔡红, 等. 蚕豆田阔叶杂草防除技术探索. 农药, 2001, 40(6):44-45.
[8] 邓玲姣, 邹知明. 三叶鬼针草生长、繁殖规律与防除效果研究. 西南农业学报, 2012, 25(4):1460-1463.
[9] 国军, 杨好伟, 王文静. 作物干扰控制杂草的前景. 中国生态农业学报, 2001, 9(2):92-93.
[10] 彭亮航, 柏连阳, 吴景. 除草剂安全剂的研究进展. 广东农业科学, 2010, 37(7):108-111.
[11] 田娟, 魏黎明, 冷廷瑞, 等. 藜麦盆栽除草剂安全性试验. 农业科技通讯, 2021(4):118-125.
[12] 卜宁, 马莲菊, 王升厚. 除草剂异丙莠诱发蚕豆根尖细胞遗传损伤的研究. 环境科学与技术, 2007, 30(10):25-27.
[13] 高惠仙, 张晓红. 除草剂对蚕豆根尖微核细胞率的影响. 山西农业科学, 2011, 39(12):1274-1276.
[14] 赵存虎, 孔庆全, 陈文晋, 等. 蚕豆田除草剂筛选初报. 作物杂志, 2018(5):167-172.
[15] 赵文祥. 5种除草剂对春蚕豆田间杂草的防效. 农业科技与信息, 2013(18):37-38.
[16] 李玮. 青海高原蚕豆田除草剂筛选及药害诊断研究. 北方园艺, 2013(22):126-128.
[17] 吴兴仙, 严牙丽, 沈云峰, 等. 除草剂对蚕豆、油菜田小籽虉草的防除效果和安全性评价. 植物保护, 2021, 47(6):339-346.
[18] 孙斌, 张志刚, 张佳佳, 等. 不同除草剂处理水平对小麦品种'豫麦49'生长的影响. 中国农学通报, 2021, 37(36):142-147.
doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2021-0137
[19] 王芙蓉, 张建学, 郭岷江, 等. 苗后除草剂喷施时期对杂草防治及冬油菜产量和品质的影响. 作物杂志, 2020(5):204-208.
[20] 许正, 徐倩, 刘明稀, 等. 除草剂‘禾耐斯’对‘兰引3号’结缕草交播草坪春季转换的影响. 草地学报, 2021, 29(3):603-609.
doi: 10.11733/j.issn.1007-0435.2021.03.022
[21] 徐雅洁. 玉米除草剂安全使用技术. 农业工程技术, 2017, 37(20):34.
[22] 冯煜, 赵颖楠, 林瑞嫦, 等. 除草剂配施安全剂对土壤酶活性与糜子根系生理代谢的影响. 农业工程学报, 2020, 36(23):117-123.
[1] Yuan Shuai, Chen Jiwang, Chen Pingping, Yi Zhenxie. Response of Yield and Cd Accumulation and Distribution in Main Crop and Ratooning Rice of Xiangzaoxian 45 to Irrigation Methods [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(3): 101-108.
[2] Zhang Guozhong, Li Juan, Li Yucai, Jin Shoulin, Hong Ruke, Huang Dajun, Pu Shihuang, Shi Congbo, Duan Zilin, Ma Di, Chen Lijuan. The Effects of Nitrogen Fertilizer Reduction and Transplanting Density on Yield and Eating Quality of Japonica Hybrid Rice Dianheyou 615 [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(3): 109-115.
[3] Ma Yihu, He Xianbiao, Chen Jian, Tang Xuejun, Wang Xuhui, He Haohao, Jin Yuqing, Qi Wen, Jiang Hailing, Zhou Cui. Effects of Seedling Ages on Grain Yield and Quality of High Quality Rice in Southeastern Zhejiang Province [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(3): 116-125.
[4] Zhao Yun, Feng Guojun, Hu Xiangwei, Wumaierjiang·Kuerban , Li Pengbing, Li Cuimei, Akebota·Muheyati . Preliminary Report on Selection of Herbicide-Resistant Foxtail Millet Varieties Suitable for Planting in Kashgar, Xinjiang [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(3): 126-133.
[5] Xing Pipeng, Huang Yanfeng, Yi Siyuan, Lan Rujian, Pan Shenggang, Mo Zhaowen, Tian Hua, Duan Meiyang, Tang Xiangru. Effects of Foliar Ornithine Spraying at Heading Stage on Yield, Quality and 2-Acetyl-1-Pyrroline Biosynthesis of Fragrant Rice [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(3): 134-138.
[6] Li Junzhi, Chang Xuhong, Wang Demei, Wang Yanjie, Yang Yushuang, Zhao Guangcai. Effects of Nitrogen Application Levels on Yield and Quality of Different Strong Gluten Wheat Varieties [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(3): 148-153.
[7] Song Chunyan, Wan Yunfan, Li Yu’e, Cai Andong, Hu Yanyan, Zhou Hui, Zhu Bo, Wang Bin. Relationships between Tiller Dynamic, Earbearing Tiller Rate and Yield of Double Cropping Rice under Elevated Temperature and CO2 Concentration [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(3): 159-166.
[8] Xu Qian, Zeng Xinyu, Xiao Bo, Li Baozheng, Zhang Xingduan. Effects of Foliar Fertilizer on Yield and Quality of Shoot Tip in Leaf-Vegetable Sweet Potato [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(3): 183-187.
[9] Guo Shulei, Wang Ying, Wei Liangming, Zhang Xin, Liu Yan, Wu Weihua, Lu Daowen, Lei Xiaobing, Wang Zhenhua, Lu Xiaomin. Analysis of Influencing Factors of Maize Yield under Different Ecological Conditions [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(3): 205-214.
[10] Luo Siwei, Shi Xiunan, Jia Yonghong, Zhang Jinshan, Wang Kai, Li Dandan, Wang Runqi, Dong Yanxue, Shi Shubing. Effects of Drip Irrigation Capillary Spacing and Drop Spacing on Photosynthesis, Dry matter Accumulation, and Yield Formation of Uniformly Sown Winter Wheat [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(3): 230-237.
[11] Zhang Haibin, Wu Xiaohua, Yu Meiling, Wang Xiaobing, Ye Jun, Cui Siyu, Li Yuanqing, Wang Zhanxian, Zhang Hongxu, Xue Wei, Li Yan, Cui Guohui, Zhao Xuanwei, Liu Juan. AMMI Model Analysis of Grain Yield of Wheat Varieties (Lines) in Inner Mongolia Regional Trials [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(3): 27-34.
[12] Li Jing, Li Pengcheng, He Yongbin, Xing Yaling, Meng Fanhua, Zhou Qian, Nan Ming. Multivariate Analysis and Comprehensive Evaluation of Main Characteristics of 16 Russian Winter Wheat Varieties [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(3): 58-65.
[13] Gao Zhenxian, Cao Qiao, Shan Zilong, Fu Xiaoyi, Han Ran, He Mingqi, Shi Zhanliang, Zheng Shusong. Preliminary Study on the Influence of Late Spring Coldness on 323 Winter Wheat Germplasm Resources [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(3): 86-93.
[14] Wei Yunfei, Li Meng, Ji Xin, Liu Juan, Wang Fujuan, Liu Qiuyuan. Effects of Different Tillage and Sowing Methods on the Growth and Yield of Direct-Seeding Rice under Full Returning of Straw [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(3): 94-100.
[15] Yang Shiqi, Chen Liming, Zhou Yanzhi, Tan Xueming, Zeng Yongjun, Shi Qinghua, Pan Xiaohua, Zeng Yanhua. Effects of Weeds Control on the Yield and Quality of Double- Cropping Direct-Seeded High-Quality Late Indica Rice [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(2): 121-125.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!