Crops ›› 2025, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (4): 49-57.doi: 10.16035/j.issn.1001-7283.2025.04.006

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Characteristics of Grain Filling and Dehydration Rate and Their Relationships with Yield of Different Wheat Varieties

Huang Jie(), Wang Jun(), Cao Yanyan, Ge Changbin(), Liao Pingʼan, Qiao Jiliang, Zhou Yang, Zhang Zhenyong, Sun Xianye   

  1. Luohe Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Luohe 462300, Henan, China
  • Received:2024-04-11 Revised:2024-06-03 Online:2025-08-15 Published:2025-08-12

Abstract:

In order to investigate the characteristics of grain filling and dehydration rate and their relationships with yield of different wheat varieties, five new wheat varieties bred by Luohe Academy of Agricultural Sciences from 2020 to 2023 were used as experimental materials, along with two control varieties. The dynamic changes of grain filling and moisture content of these varieties were examined. This could potentially serve as a theoretical foundation for breeding wheat varieties with quick filling and dehydration rates and do not require drying processes at harvest time. The results showed that there were significant differences among these varieties in the grain-filling rate at different stages after anthesis; the average grain-filling rate and grain-filling time in fast increase period were the key factors during the whole filling period; the initial grain-filling rates of Luomai 49, Luomai 50 and Zhoumai 18 were relatively large, mean grain-filling rate, grain-filling rate in incremental period and fast increase period were higher, the 1000-grain weight at 29 days after anthesis was more than 42 g, the filling was completed quickly, and the 1000-grain weight 41 days after anthesis and yield were higher; the 1000-grain weight of Luomai 26 was significantly lower at different filling stages over the three years; the performance of 1000-grain weight of Luomai 36 was inconsistent in different years; mean grain-filling rate, grain-filling time in incremental period, grain-filling rate in fast increase period were significantly positively correlated with 1000-grain weight. From physiological maturity to harvest, the average grain moisture content followed a slow-fast-slow pattern and decreased most rapidly around 39 days after anthesis; there were significant differences in grain moisture content and average dehydration rate among different wheat varieties; the average dehydration rate of Luomai 49, Luomai 50 and Zhoumai 18 were fast after physiological maturity and Luomai 26 was slow; grain moisture content at harvest was positively correlated with grain moisture content at physiological maturity, and was significantly negatively correlated with average dehydration rate and average dehydration rate at two to four days after physiological maturity. In summary, Luomai 49, Luomai 50 and Zhoumai 18 demonstrate well-synchronized grain-filling and dehydration process. The 1000-grain weight greater than 42 g at 29 days after anthesis could be used as the criterion for measuring the grain-filling rate. The average grain moisture content of 39 days after anthesis was used as an index to evaluate the dehydration rate of wheat.

Key words: Wheat, Grain filling characteristic, Grain moisture content, Dehydration characteristic, 1000-grain weight

Fig.1

The highest temperature, relative humidity and wind speed of test base"

Table 1

Yield and its components of different wheat varieties"

品种
Variety
千粒重
1000-grain weight (g)
穗数
Spike number (×104/hm2)
穗粒数
Grain number per spike
理论产量
Theoretical yield (kg/hm2)
实际产量
Actual yield (kg/hm2)
漯麦26 Luomai 26 48.01c 600.15a 34.22c 8380.53c 7701.45b
漯麦36 Luomai 36 48.70b 555.15c 37.23a 8555.70b 7941.00bc
漯麦40 Luomai 40 48.95b 562.05b 35.20bc 8232.10c 7731.75ab
漯麦49 Luomai 49 50.43a 579.00ab 36.34b 9018.99a 8314.50a
漯麦50 Luomai 50 50.09a 585.30ab 35.29bc 8794.89a 8140.65a
周麦18 Zhoumai 18 49.56a 588.45ab 35.50bc 8800.24a 8094.15ab
百农207 Bainong 207 49.06b 552.45c 36.02b 8297.47c 7611.45c
平均Average 49.26 574.65 35.64 8582.85 7933.56

Table 2

Analysis of 1000-grain weight difference after anthesis g"

年份
Year
品种
Variety
花后天数Days after anthesis
9 d 13 d 17 d 21 d 25 d 29 d 33 d 37 d 41 d
2020-2021 漯麦26 10.39 14.53 20.67 28.94 37.53 43.20 46.77 48.67 48.49
漯麦36 14.20 18.72 22.87 30.97 38.85 43.84 47.82 50.01 49.53
漯麦40 11.16 14.43 20.12 27.59 35.61 41.74 46.90 49.20 49.01
漯麦49 12.15 16.10 22.54 31.33 40.60 46.39 49.37 50.83 50.42
漯麦50 12.60 15.74 21.48 29.20 37.54 44.09 48.27 50.32 50.05
周麦18 12.62 16.26 21.39 28.22 36.04 42.75 48.12 50.15 49.80
百农207 11.03 14.69 20.98 29.10 37.95 43.93 48.10 49.66 49.28
平均 12.02 15.78 21.44 29.34 37.73 43.71 47.91 49.83 49.51
2021-2022 漯麦26 11.83 14.46 19.27 24.78 31.28 38.27 43.51 47.90 47.15
漯麦36 12.19 15.78 21.42 27.98 35.68 43.20 47.47 48.69 48.00
漯麦40 12.16 15.68 20.44 26.38 33.08 40.46 46.24 48.54 48.01
漯麦49 12.56 16.09 21.91 28.47 36.35 44.02 49.49 50.72 50.06
漯麦50 11.80 15.79 21.26 28.21 35.72 43.23 48.55 50.38 49.76
周麦18 12.32 15.10 19.84 25.68 32.53 39.96 46.05 49.40 48.94
百农207 11.68 14.69 19.88 26.20 33.83 41.22 47.17 48.93 48.45
平均 12.08 15.37 20.57 26.81 34.07 41.48 46.93 49.22 48.62
2022-2023 漯麦26 8.89 14.77 20.26 26.76 34.21 41.07 44.50 44.78
漯麦36 7.48 12.37 18.70 26.28 35.05 42.81 46.06 46.11
漯麦40 8.21 13.56 20.96 28.91 36.44 42.96 45.64 45.64
漯麦49 10.52 15.59 22.06 29.69 38.00 44.83 47.56 47.56
漯麦50 10.51 15.00 20.53 28.46 36.35 43.85 46.60 46.74
周麦18 9.43 15.72 21.79 28.88 37.02 43.43 46.43 46.51
百农207 11.10 15.52 21.02 26.55 34.39 41.71 45.37 45.61
平均 9.45 14.65 20.76 27.93 35.92 42.95 46.02 46.14

Fig.2

The change trend of average 1000-grain weight after anthesis in three years The different lowercase letters indicate significant difference at P < 0.05 level, the same below."

Fig.3

The change trend of average grain-filling rate after anthesis in 2020-2023"

Table 3

Characteristic parameters of grain-filling in different wheat varieties"

年份Year 品种Variety Rmax Tmax Rmean T1 R1 T2 R2 T3 R3
2020-2021 漯麦26 1.93 22.20 1.12 13.42 0.99 15.92 1.70 12.66 0.43
漯麦36 2.16 16.50 1.14 8.27 1.03 22.05 1.78 13.68 0.57
漯麦40 1.87 23.21 1.16 13.81 0.89 17.68 1.66 11.51 0.65
漯麦49 2.14 22.25 1.18 14.02 0.93 19.19 1.83 10.79 0.52
漯麦50 1.90 23.43 1.16 14.02 0.94 21.95 1.81 8.02 0.41
周麦18 1.80 20.85 1.14 10.72 1.19 19.47 1.74 11.81 0.54
百农207 2.11 18.63 1.15 10.39 1.15 20.00 1.69 11.60 0.72
平均 1.99 21.01 1.15 12.09 1.02 19.47 1.74 11.44 0.55
2021-2022 漯麦26 1.53 26.00 1.06 14.03 0.84 23.10 1.48 7.88 0.55
漯麦36 1.73 23.69 1.04 13.56 0.90 19.52 1.56 11.92 0.45
漯麦40 1.66 23.75 1.08 12.78 0.95 20.74 1.49 10.49 0.49
漯麦49 1.82 23.62 1.16 11.48 0.91 21.57 1.72 9.94 0.59
漯麦50 1.80 22.62 1.14 12.48 0.91 22.39 1.76 9.12 0.60
周麦18 1.71 24.08 1.12 13.11 0.97 21.37 1.61 8.52 0.52
百农207 1.79 22.77 1.11 12.64 0.88 18.89 1.55 12.47 0.64
平均 1.72 23.79 1.10 12.87 0.91 21.08 1.60 10.05 0.55
2022-2023 漯麦26 1.75 20.07 1.09 10.66 1.08 16.73 1.58 13.60 0.39
漯麦36 2.15 19.71 1.10 11.96 0.93 18.90 1.65 10.14 0.63
漯麦40 2.08 18.88 1.11 11.14 0.97 18.75 1.63 11.11 0.65
漯麦49 2.09 17.19 1.18 8.96 1.30 20.38 1.84 10.66 0.46
漯麦50 1.96 18.13 1.16 9.35 1.25 20.89 1.71 9.76 0.36
周麦18 1.91 20.13 1.13 11.35 1.00 18.94 1.68 10.71 0.61
百农207 1.72 21.00 1.08 10.87 1.06 18.08 1.49 13.05 0.57
平均 1.95 19.30 1.12 10.61 1.09 18.96 1.65 11.29 0.52

Table 4

Correlation between different grain filling parameters and 1000-grain weight"

Rmax Tmax Rmean T1 R1 T2 R2 T3 R3
0.036 0.349 0.447* 0.304 -0.239 0.457* 0.472* -0.248 0.124

Fig.4

Changes of grain moisture content from physiological maturity to harvest of wheat varieties in different years"

Table 5

Grain moisture content and dehydration rate of different wheat varieties"

年份112
Year
品种
Variety
生理成熟期含水率
Grain moisture content during
physiological maturity (%)
收获期含水率
Grain moisture content
at harvest (%)
生理成熟后平均脱水速率
Average dehydration rate after
physiological maturity (%/d)
生理成熟后脱水速率
Dehydration rate after
physiological maturity (%/d)
0~2 d 2~4 d 4~6 d
2020-2021 漯麦26 30.37d 9.89bc 3.41c 1.12d 3.58e 5.54c
漯麦36 30.58d 9.56c 3.50c 3.34a 3.83d 3.34e
漯麦40 36.58bc 11.32a 4.21ab 1.97c 5.42a 5.24c
漯麦49 39.27a 11.04ab 4.70a 3.02a 4.29c 6.81b
漯麦50 37.91b 10.32b 4.60a 1.67c 4.07c 8.06a
周麦18 38.05b 11.82a 4.37ab 1.01d 3.76d 8.35a
百农207 35.62c 11.48a 4.02b 2.63b 4.64b 4.80d
平均 35.48 10.78 4.12 2.11 4.23 6.02
2021-2022 漯麦26 27.95e 4.47e 3.91d 2.39e 7.46ab 1.89bc
漯麦36 30.46d 5.09d 4.23bc 5.39b 5.06c 2.24ab
漯麦40 32.20c 7.10a 4.18c 4.12d 6.50b 1.93b
漯麦49 34.80ab 5.51c 4.88a 4.73c 7.86a 2.05b
漯麦50 35.82a 6.80b 4.84a 5.78ab 6.27bc 2.46a
周麦18 32.65bc 5.27cd 4.56ab 6.51a 5.52c 1.67c
百农207 33.45b 6.94ab 4.42b 2.86e 7.74a 2.66a
平均 32.48 5.88 4.43 4.54 6.63 2.13

Table 6

Correlation between grain moisture content at harvest and grain moisture content at physiological maturity and dehydration rate"

生理成熟期含水率
Grain moisture
content during
physiological
maturity (%)
生理成熟后
平均脱水速率
Average dehydration
rate after physiological
maturity (%/d)
生理成熟后脱水速率
Dehydration rate after
physiological
maturity (%/d)
0~2 d 2~4 d 4~6 d
0.0325 -0.5537* -0.1167 -0.5848* -0.0502
[1] 朱冬梅, 王慧, 刘大同, 等. 小麦籽粒灌浆与脱水特性. 中国农业科学, 2019, 52(23):4251-4261.
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2019.23.006
[2] 何贤芳, 赵莉, 刘泽, 等. 安徽省主栽小麦品种(系)脱水及穗发芽特性研究. 滁州学院学报, 2016, 18(2):70-74.
[3] 郭天财, 彭羽, 朱云集, 等. 播期对不同穗型、筋型优质冬小麦影响效应研究. 耕作与栽培, 2001(2):19-20.
[4] 孙进先, 魏秀华, 王国飞, 等. 品种、播期、灌水和施氮量对小麦灌浆速率的影响. 山东农业科学, 2010(7):48-50.
[5] 任明全, 徐向阳. 不同小麦品种籽粒灌浆特性的研究. 华北农学报, 1993, 8(3):28-32.
doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-7091.1993.03.006
[6] 吴晓丽, 汤永禄, 李朝苏, 等. 四川盆地小麦籽粒的灌浆特性. 作物学报, 2014, 40(2):337-345.
[7] 王晨阳, 郭天财, 马冬云, 等. 环境、基因型及其互作对小麦主要品质性状的影响. 植物生态学报, 2008, 32(6):1397-1406.
doi: 10.3773/j.issn.1005-264x.2008.06.021
[8] Lobell D B, Field C B, Cahill K N, et al. Impacts of future climate change on California perennial crop yields: model projections with climate and crop uncertainties. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 2006, 141(2/3/4):208-218.
[9] Gbetibouo G A, Hassan R M. Measuring the economic impact of climate change on major South African field crops: a Ricardian approach. Global and Planetary Change, 2005, 47(2/3/4):143-152.
[10] 刘显君, 王振华, 王霞, 等. 玉米籽粒生理成熟后自然脱水速率QTL的初步定位. 作物学报, 2010, 36(1):47-52.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2010.00047
[11] 万泽花, 任佰朝, 赵斌, 等. 不同熟期夏玉米品种籽粒灌浆脱水特性和激素含量变化. 作物学报, 2019, 45(9):1446-1453.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2019.83078
[12] 李璐璐, 薛军, 谢瑞芝, 等. 夏玉米籽粒含水率对机械粒收质量的影响. 作物学报, 2018, 44(12):1747-1754.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2018.01747
[13] 王瑞霞, 张秀英, 伍玲, 等. 不同生态环境条件下小麦籽粒灌浆速率及千粒重QTL分析. 作物学报, 2008, 34(10):1750-1756.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2008.01750
[14] Troyer A F, Ambrose W B. Plant characteristics affecting field drying rate of ear corn. Crop Science, 1971, 11(4):529-531.
[15] Wang Z H, Wang X, Zhang L, et al. QTL underlying field grain drying rate after physiological maturity in maize (Zea mays L.). Euphytica, 2012, 185(3):521-528.
[16] 朱冬梅, 张晓, 别同德, 等. 小麦籽粒脱水特性研究. 扬州大学学报(农业与生命科学版), 2015, 36(2):77-78.
[17] 朱冬梅, 胡文静, 别同德, 等. 利用四交RIL群体定位小麦籽粒脱水速率QTL. 麦类作物学报, 2020, 40(1):49-54.
[18] 冯素伟, 王光涛, 王玉泉, 等. 不同小麦品种籽粒脱水特性研究. 华北农学报, 2020, 35(2):65-71.
doi: 10.7668/hbnxb.20190884
[19] 程晓明, 王慧, 陈树林, 等. 不同小麦品种籽粒灌浆、脱水特性及其与产量和品质的关系. 河南农业大学学报, 2023, 57(2):197-206,230.
[20] 黄杰, 王君, 葛昌斌, 等. 漯河市小麦籽粒灌浆特性及其与气象因子的关系. 江苏农业科学, 2022, 50(19):86-92.
[21] 来有鹏. 我国干热风研究进展. 青海农林科技, 2022(3):57-60,81.
[22] 周忠文, 昔小丽, 赵玮, 等. 气象条件对陇东塬区冬小麦灌浆速率的影响. 麦类作物学报, 2014, 34(6):837-841.
[23] 周国勤, 谢旭东, 姜明波, 等. 不同播期豫南稻茬麦产量及其与气象因子的通径分析. 河南农业科学, 2019, 48(9):23-29.
[24] 姜丽娜, 张雅雯, 朱娅林, 等. 不同小麦品种籽粒灌浆特性及产量研究. 华北农学报, 2019, 34(3):96-101.
doi: 10.7668/hbnxb.201751302
[25] 李文阳, 尹燕枰, 闫素辉, 等. 不同粒型小麦品种籽粒内源激素变化与籽粒灌浆特征的比较. 华北农学报, 2007, 22(1):5-8.
doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-7091.2007.01.002
[26] Brdar M, Kraljević-Balatić M, Kobiljski B. Observed duration and average and maximum grain filling rates in wheat genotypes of different earliness. Genetika, 2004, 36(3):229-235.
[27] 吴少辉, 高海涛, 张学品, 等. 播期对不同习性小麦品种籽粒灌浆特性的影响. 麦类作物学报, 2004, 24(4):105-107.
[28] Nass H G, Reiser B. Grain filling period and grain yield relationships in spring wheat. Canadian Journal of Plant Science, 1975, 55(3):673-678.
[29] 覃鹏, 孔治有, 程晓明, 等. Wx基因缺失对灌浆期小麦旗叶光合特性的影响. 云南农业大学学报(自然科学), 2015, 30(4):505-510.
[30] 成林, 张志红, 方文松. 干热风对冬小麦灌浆速率和千粒重的影响. 麦类作物学报, 2014, 34(2):248-254.
[31] 刘万代, 常明娟, 史校艳, 等. 花后高温胁迫对小麦灌浆特性及产量的影响. 麦类作物学报, 2019, 39(5):581-588.
[32] Stone P J, Nicolas M E. Wheat cultivars vary widely in their responses of grain yield and quality to short periods of post- anthesis heat stress. Functional Plant Biology, 1994, 21(6):887-900.
[33] 张定一, 张永清, 闫翠萍, 等. 基因型、播期和密度对不同成穗型小麦籽粒产量和灌浆特性的影响. 应用与环境生物学报, 2009, 15(1):28-34.
[34] 牛明功, 胡炳义, 张胜, 等. 小麦种子脱水过程中多胺水平的变化. 种子, 2006(11):61-63.
[35] 刘忠奇, 张海清, 贺记外, 等. 成熟期水稻种子脱水速率全基因组关联分析. 中国水稻科学, 2024, 38(2):150-159.
doi: 10.16819/j.1001-7216.2024.230305
[36] 刘忠奇, 贺记外, 张海清, 等. 植物种子脱水耐性的研究现状分析与展望. 中国农学通报, 2020, 36(2):36-41.
doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb20190600291
[1] Sun Xianyin, Zhang Jibo, Lü Guangde, Qi Xiaolei, Sun Yingying, Mi Yong, Mu Qiuhuan, Yin Xundong, Wang Ruixia, Qian Zhaoguo, Gao Minggang. Comparison of High and Stable Yield Characteristics of Different Genotypes of Wheat under Dryland and Supplemental Irrigation Conditions [J]. Crops, 2025, 41(4): 104-110.
[2] Wang Xingya, Chen Yuhan, Zhang Mengwen, Sun Linlin, Chen Lirong, Guo Yuqiu, Gong Kuijie. The Effects of ABA Application at Different Stages on Maize Grain Filling and Dehydration [J]. Crops, 2025, 41(4): 173-180.
[3] Li Yun, Wang Jing, Liu Yankun, Zhao Guanghui, Zheng Minna. Regulation of Yield and Lodging Resistance of Stem in Tartary Buckwheat by Paclobutrazol Leaf Spraying [J]. Crops, 2025, 41(4): 231-237.
[4] Luo Xinggang, Wan Haiyuan, An Lirong, Li Yonghai, Luo Xingyu, Zhang Xuekai, Liang Weiyun, Zhu Jianqiang. Effects of Different Varieties and Nitrogen Application Rate on Border Effect, Yield, and Water Use Efficiency of Spring Wheat under Ridge Tillage with Drill Sowing [J]. Crops, 2025, 41(4): 251-258.
[5] Wang Zhigang, Liu Qiang, Wang Jin, Gong Jingjin, Yao Qunying. Simulation of Response of Spring Wheat Yield and Biomass to Nitrogen Application Rate and Sowing Date in Dryland under Future Meteorological Conditions [J]. Crops, 2025, 41(4): 276-282.
[6] Dou Yang, Chen Junyi, Ren Shumin, Kang Guozhang, Wang Liming. Composition Analysis of High Molecular Weight Glutenin Subunits in 121 Wheat Varieties (Lines) [J]. Crops, 2025, 41(4): 75-79.
[7] Hou Yue, Wang Hongliang, Li Jie, Li Chunjie, Chen Fanjun. Research Advances on the Effects of Cereal/Legume Forage Intercropping on Forage Quality and Nitrogen Uptake [J]. Crops, 2025, 41(3): 1-10.
[8] He Yunxia, Ma Jianhui, Zhang Daijing, Liu Donghua, Chao Xiaoyan, Chen Huiping, Li Chunxi. Study on the Effect of Different Nitrogen Fertilizer Synergists on Reducing Gaseous Nitrogen Loss and Increasing Yield in Wheat Field of Northern Henan [J]. Crops, 2025, 41(3): 108-115.
[9] Wang Jiatong, Ma Yingchen, Feng Yanfei, Lu Jiahui, Guo Zhenqing, Li Xueli, Li Yun, Han Yucui, Lin Xiaohu. Effects of Reduction of Nitrogen Topdressing Application on Phosphorus and Potassium Fertilizer Utilization and Quality of Spring Wheat in Eastern Hebei Province [J]. Crops, 2025, 41(3): 141-148.
[10] Li Jiahao, Jia Yonghong, Lian Shihao, Liu Yue, Yu Shan, Tian Wenqiang, Wang Ziqian, Zhang Jinshan, Shi Shubing. Effects of Prohexadione-Calcium and Phosphorus Application Rate on the Growth, Dry Matter Accumulation, and Yield of Winter Wheat [J]. Crops, 2025, 41(3): 165-171.
[11] Fan Ming, Li Hongxia, Wang Ke, Tang Huali, Yang Le, Li Qianrong, Ye Xingguo, Zhang Shuangxi. Breeding and Cultivation Techniques of a New Wheat Variety Ningchun 66 with Powdery Mildew Resistance [J]. Crops, 2025, 41(3): 249-254.
[12] Huang Ming, Fu Xinxin, Zhang Zhenwang, Zhang Jun, Li Youjun. Effects of Seed Sizes on Seed Germination, Seedling Characteristics and Drought Resistance of Dryland Wheat [J]. Crops, 2025, 41(3): 255-262.
[13] Xu Lang, Wang Yu, Wang Xiangru, Li Hongjun, Tang Wan, Wang Bingqing, Yang Qiang, Zhang Fan, Chen Zhiyuan, Zhou Meiliang. Study on the Flavonoids Content Changes and Utilization Guidance in Storage and Processing of Tartary Buckwheat [J]. Crops, 2025, 41(3): 85-91.
[14] Tian Wenqiang, Wang Hongyi, Nie Lingfan, Sun Ganggang, Zhang Jun, Zhang Qiangbin, Yu Shan, Li Jiahao, Zhang Jinshan, Shi Shubing. The Effects of Sowing Date and Sowing Rate on the Growth, Dry Matter Accumulation and Yield of Extremely Late-Sown Wheat Population [J]. Crops, 2025, 41(2): 115-122.
[15] Zhao Yuanling, Tan Weiwei, Liu Zhaojun, Li Tie, Li Dongmei, Sun Minglong, Gao Fengmei, Wang Yongbin. Cultivation of New Wheat Lines with Low Lipoxygenase (LOX) Activity and Storage Tolerance by Anther Culture Technology [J]. Crops, 2025, 41(2): 40-46.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!