谷子新不育系的配合力分析

doi:10.16035/j.issn.1001-7283.2017.02.008

Abstract

Abstract:

Understanding the genetic basis of combining ability of two lines in foxtail millet would provide theory basis for future selection of hybrid millet. According to NCⅡ incomplete double-row hybridization design, 30 new sterile lines and 4 restorers were selected as parental materials, and 120 (30×4) hybrid combinations were designed in this study. The results showed that significant differences existed among the main agronomic traits of two lines hybrid combinations. The differences between the same traits of different materials and the different traits of the same material were quite significant. S9, S12, S25, S27 and R1 had higher GCA in yield traits, which were the ideal parents. Additionally, there was a wide range of super-parental and competitive advantages among those combinations, and 10 combinations were significantly increased in the converted yield. These results indicated that it was not only parents with a higher GCA, especially sterile line, but also the combination with higher SCA, which were needed for creating stronger combination of hybrid millet.

Key words: Hybrid foxtail millet, Photo-thermo-sensitive sterile line, General combining ability, Special combining ability, Heterosis

Gouliang Song,Xiaolei Feng,Guangyu Fan,Gaolei Shi,Shuangdong Li,Feng Wang,Xiaoming Wang,Zhihai Zhao. Analysis of Parental Combining Ability of New Sterile Lines in Foxtail Millet[J].Crops, 2017, 33(2): 44-50.

Figures/Tables 7

Table 1

Table 2

Table 3

Estimates of general combining ability effects of main characters for parents"

亲本 Parent	株高 Plant height	穗长 Ear length	脖长 Neck long	穗粗 Spike width	有效穗数 Productive ear number	穗重 Ear weight	穗粒重 Grain weight per ear	千粒重 1000-grain weight	产量 Yield
R1	1.63	7.71	18.46	0.38	-16.01	9.88	11.06	3.55	5.55
R2	1.20	-6.97	-4.59	-3.48	7.85	-4.23	-3.43	-2.16	-0.87
R3	-8.05	-0.53	-7.38	2.94	-10.71	-0.11	0.85	3.10	-1.23
R4	5.23	-0.24	-6.51	-0.38	17.72	-5.61	-8.48	-5.04	-3.45
S2	-5.03	-3.64	-14.86	-10.28	-15.67	-17.94	-16.37	-6.37	-15.29
S3	-0.35	-12.04	2.71	2.49	4.17	9.91	11.35	2.30	9.39
S4	1.52	10.34	-2.69	-1.34	-5.75	-16.57	-18.35	-5.34	-14.96
S5	-0.88	2.88	-1.34	3.77	-10.71	-0.32	1.99	-1.27	-4.72
S6	-6.43	0.71	-4.85	4.09	-35.52	0.27	1.84	0.72	-24.17
S7	-3.25	-5.88	1.17	-3.51	24.36	-5.59	-5.34	-0.36	-2.39
S8	-5.73	-3.33	-11.88	-1.66	-35.52	0.92	4.81	-2.46	9.70
S9	-1.29	-1.78	5.42	1.53	9.13	0.27	2.68	0.61	10.28
S10	-1.81	3.82	5.42	4.73	-10.71	6.81	8.11	-2.27	-14.29
S12	-2.40	-9.86	-5.40	-1.34	14.09	-11.19	-8.60	0.42	10.44
S13	-0.41	-2.71	1.63	-1.34	9.13	-3.74	-1.32	1.97	6.96
S14	1.23	1.33	3.25	0.57	9.13	0.48	0.71	1.77	-6.17
S16	4.85	-5.51	2.71	-0.38	-10.71	-4.24	-5.30	3.16	-6.88
S17	4.56	-4.26	1.63	-1.66	-25.60	9.51	9.00	-0.11	-12.65
S18	-1.64	-3.33	-0.26	2.17	-15.67	14.67	12.51	1.63	-4.27
S19	-1.35	4.13	-13.50	-0.38	-20.63	-12.44	-18.71	2.82	1.81
S20	15.38	4.13	17.04	3.45	-15.67	-3.32	-3.88	3.99	-0.19
S23	-6.02	0.71	-0.26	-7.09	33.93	-22.85	-20.68	-6.87	4.00
S24	-9.42	-5.51	-2.15	-9.64	38.89	-27.57	-29.69	0.50	8.41
S25	-3.68	8.17	10.01	5.04	-20.63	16.29	15.78	4.84	14.22
S26	0.18	8.79	14.61	6.00	-15.67	31.57	32.95	5.29	-12.72
S27	-3.33	2.57	7.31	1.85	-15.67	37.97	39.94	1.58	14.07
S28	8.65	1.02	4.88	1.21	-20.63	26.97	28.98	-0.97	9.22
S29	5.32	-2.71	4.34	2.49	-0.79	-11.03	-18.29	2.77	1.76
S30	-5.20	1.64	-7.83	-0.38	9.13	-1.94	1.70	1.83	8.84
S31	1.11	-3.64	-0.26	1.21	24.01	13.97	11.62	1.02	-2.67
S32	8.01	9.10	-8.91	-2.94	24.01	-1.12	-0.59	-0.30	1.05
S33	6.90	-0.85	-5.40	-2.94	53.77	-15.15	-16.94	-2.71	1.25
S34	2.22	6.30	-0.26	1.21	24.01	-7.14	-9.38	-7.12	2.02
S35	-1.64	-0.85	-2.42	-1.02	-10.71	-8.02	-10.56	-5.18	7.94

Table 3

Table 4

Table 5

Table 6

Table 7

References 23

[1]	刘晓辉, 杨明, 宋桂芹 , 等. 21世纪特用谷子育种思考. 吉林农业科学, 2004,29(6):9-10,22. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1003-8701.2004.06.002
[2]	古世禄, 马建萍, 刘子坚, 等 .谷子 ( 粟)的水分利用及节水技术研究. 干旱地区农业研究, 2001,19(1):40-47.
[3]	孟庆立, 关周博, 冯佰利 , 等. 谷子抗旱相关性状的主成分与模糊聚类分析. 中国农业科学, 2009,42(8):2667-2675.
[4]	邱风仓, 冯小磊 . 我国谷子杂优利用回顾、现状与发展趋势.中国种业, 2013(3):11-12.
[5]	赵治海, 崔文生, 杜贵, 等 .谷子光 ( 温)敏不育系821选育及其不育性与光、温关系的研究. 中国农业科学, 1995,29(5):23-31.
[6]	崔文生, 孔玉珍, 赵治海 , 等. 谷子光敏型隐性核不育材料“292”选育初报. 华北农学报, 1991,6(s):177-178.
[7]	罗彦长, 李成荃, 张端品 , 等. 粳型水稻核不育系配合力及遗传力研究. 安徽农业科学, 2001,29(4):417-421.
[8]	王利民, 张建平, 党照 , 等. 胡麻两系杂交亲本的配合力及杂种优势分析. 中国农业科学, 2016,49(6):1047-1059.
[9]	吕建群, 陈林, 曾宪平 . 7个籼型新不育系和7个新恢复系的配合力及利用价值评价. 西南农业学报, 2009,22(1):12-18.
[10]	赵庆勇, 朱镇, 张亚东 , 等. 12个粳稻新不育系的配合力及利用价值评价. 中国水稻科学, 2008,22(1):57-64. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1001-7216.2008.01.010
[11]	袁克录, 李继强, 谢新学 , 等. 6个新育玉米自交系配合力测定. 分子植物育种, 2016,14(1):216-222.
[12]	高若禹, 刘鑫, 邓昆鹏 , 等. 12份玉米自交系主要农艺性状配合力及杂种优势分析. 东北农业大学, 2016,41(3):14-17.
[13]	段冰, 柳青山, 梁笃 , 等. 饲用高粱品质性状配合力分析.作物杂志, 2016(1):51-55. doi: 10.16035/j.issn.1001-7283.2016.01.010
[14]	吕鑫, 平俊爱, 张福耀 , 等. 新选饲草高粱恢复系农艺性状配合力效应分析. 草业科学, 2016,33(7):1361-1366. doi: 10.11829/j.issn.1001-0629.2015-0265
[15]	吕郭民 . 谷子主要数量性状配合力研究.黑龙江农业科学, 1990(1):13-15.
[16]	夏雪岩, 刘正理, 程汝宏 , 等. 两个谷子新不育系几个性状的配合力评价和遗传力分析. 中国农业科技导报, 2013,15(1):116-122. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1008-0864.2013.01.19
[17]	李素英, 冯小磊, 范光宇 , 等. 几个骨干谷子雄性不育系和恢复系的配合力分析. 河北农业科学, 2016,20(2):1-4. doi: 10.16318/j.cnki.hbnykx.2016.02.001
[18]	莫惠栋 . P×Q交配模式的配合力分析. 江苏农学院学报, 1982,3(3):51-57.
[19]	莫惠栋 . P×Q交配模式的配合力分析(续). 江苏农学院学报, 1982,3(4):53-57.
[20]	黄玉碧, 高之仁, 荣廷昭 . 不完全双列杂交样本容量的研究. 四川农业大学学报, 1991,9(3):445-451.
[21]	胡文明, 徐扬, 张恩盈 , 等. 基于QTL定位分析策略的一般配合力遗传基础研究. 中国农业科学, 2013,46(16):3305-3313. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2013.16.001
[22]	程勇, 顾敏, 丛野 , 等. 淹水胁迫条件下甘蓝型油菜发芽期耐湿性的配合力分析. 中国农业科学, 2010,43(7):1339-1345. doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2010.07.003
[23]	刘金波, 宋兆强, 王宝祥 , 等. 几个新选杂交水稻不育系和恢复系的主要农艺性状的配合力分析. 西南农业学报, 2016,29(2):209-231. doi: 10.16213/j.cnki.scjas.2016.02.001

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

Comments

Recommended 10

[1]	Guangcai Zhao,Xuhong Chang,Demei Wang,Zhiqiang Tao,Yanjie Wang,Yushuang Yang,Yingjie Zhu. General Situation and Development of Wheat Production[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 1 -7 .
[2]	Baoquan Quan,Dongmei Bai,Yuexia Tian,Yunyun Xue. Effects of Different Leaf-Peg Ratio on Photosynthesis and Yield of Peanut[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 102 -105 .
[3]	Xuefang Huang,Mingjing Huang,Huatao Liu,Cong Zhao,Juanling Wang. Effects of Annual Precipitation and Population Density on Tiller-Earing and Yield of Zhangzagu 5 under Film Mulching and Hole Sowing[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 106 -113 .
[4]	Wenhui Huang, Hui Wang, Desheng Mei. Research Progress on Lodging Resistance of Crops[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 13 -19 .
[5]	Yun Zhao,Cailong Xu,Xu Yang,Suzhen Li,Jing Zhou,Jicun Li,Tianfu Han,Cunxiang Wu. Effects of Sowing Methods on Seedling Stand and Production Profit of Summer Soybean under Wheat-Soybean System[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 114 -120 .
[6]	Mei Lu,Min Sun,Aixia Ren,Miaomiao Lei,Lingzhu Xue,Zhiqiang Gao. Effects of Spraying Foliar Fertilizers on Dryland Wheat Growth and the Correlation with Yield Formation[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 121 -125 .
[7]	Xiaofei Wang,Haijun Xu,Mengqiao Guo,Yu Xiao,Xinyu Cheng,Shuxia Liu,Xiangjun Guan,Yaokun Wu,Weihua Zhao,Guojiang Wei. Effects of Sowing Date, Density and Fertilizer Utilization Rate on the Yield of Oilseed Perilla frutescens in Cold Area[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 126 -130 .
[8]	Pengjin Zhu,Xinhua Pang,Chun Liang,Qinliang Tan,Lin Yan,Quanguang Zhou,Kewei Ou. Effects of Cold Stress on Reactive Oxygen Metabolism and Antioxidant Enzyme Activities of Sugarcane Seedlings[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 131 -137 .
[9]	Jie Gao,Qingfeng Li,Qiu Peng,Xiaoyan Jiao,Jinsong Wang. Effects of Different Nutrient Combinations on Plant Production and Nitrogen, Phosphorus and Potassium Utilization Characteristics in Waxy Sorghum[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 138 -142 .
[10]	Na Shang,Zhongxu Yang,Qiuzhi Li,Huihui Yin,Shihong Wang,Haitao Li,Tong Li,Han Zhang. Response of Cotton with Vegetative Branches to Plant Density in the Western of Shandong Province[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 143 -148 .

代号Code	来源Origin	代号Code	来源Origin	代号Code	来源Origin
S2	A2变异-2	S3	A2变异-3	S4	A2变异-4
S5	A2变异-5	S6	A2变异-6	S7	A2变异-7
S8	A2变异-8	S9	A2变异-9	S10	A2变异-10
S12	A2变异-12	S13	A2变异-13	S14	A2变异-14
S16	A2×晋谷21	S17	A2×晋谷21	S18	A2×晋谷21
S19	A2×晋谷21	S20	A2×晋谷21	S23	A2×抗性材料12088
S24	A2×抗性材料12088	S25	A2×复28	S26	A2×复28
S27	A2×复28	S28	A2×A2×衡水农家种	S29	A2×A2×A2×衡水农家种
S30	A2×衡水农家种	S31	航空育种A2变异株	S32	航天育种A2变异株
S33	A2×抗性材料7612	S34	不育系1826×A2	S35	A2×十里香
R1	张杂谷3号父	R2	张杂谷5号父	R3	张杂谷6号父
R4	张杂谷10号父

变因 Variable	株高 Plant height	穗长 Ear length	脖长 Neck long	穗粗 Spike width	有效穗数 Productive ear number	穗重 Ear weight	穗粒重 Grain weight per ear	千粒重 1000-grain weight	产量 Yield
组合(H)	25.17^**	4.20^**	7.45^**	3.08^**	3.30^**	1 273.43^**	1 103.75^**	100.81^**	506.39^**
恢复系(R)	362.89^**	45.20^**	141.85^**	11.99^**	17.91^**	3 447.29^**	3 402.52^**	1 471.96^**	742.41^**
不育系(S)	42.23^**	4.99^**	6.73^**	3.51^**	4.83^**	2 192.30^**	1 728.11^**	128.68^**	655.61^**
S×R	7.84^**	2.53^**	3.06^**	2.63^**	2.28^**	892.18^**	816.36^**	44.24^**	448.52^**

组合 Combination	株高 Plant height	穗长 Ear length	脖长 Neck long	穗粗 Spike width	有效穗数 Productive ear number	穗重 Ear weight	穗粒重 Grain weight per ear	千粒重 1000-grain weight	产量 Yield
最高组合 Highest combination	S28×R3 10.97	S2×R2 21.26	S7×R2 23.76	S2×R2 18.49	S7×R4 76.17	S5×R3 41.09	S3×R2 48.28	S34×R2 8.17	S35×R3 39.35
最低组合 Lowest combination	S28×R1 -11.58	S2×R3 -17.49	S8×R2 -20.82	S18×R2 -13.12	S23×R1 -58.40	S26×R1 -34.15	S3×R1 -60.12	S32×R3 -18.11	S31×R1 -37.99
效应值变幅 Effect range	-11.58~10.97	-17.49~21.26	-20.82~23.76	-13.12~18.49	-58.40~76.17	-34.15~41.09	-60.12~48.28	-18.11~8.17	-37.99~39.35

性状 Character	超亲优势Heterobeltiosis				竞争优势Competitive edge
性状 Character	变幅Range	均值 Mean	正向杂种优势组合数 Number of positive heterosis combination	正向杂种优势均值 Positive heterosis mean	变幅Range	均值 Mean	正向杂种优势组合数 Number of positive heterosis combination	正向杂种优势均值 Positive heterosis mean
株高 Plant height	-23.49~20.15	-7.18	14	6.75	-23.21~16.54	-4.01	35	2.16
穗长 Ear length	-35.65~31.88	-4.51	33	10.99	-11.62~37.49	12.83	103	14.14
脖长 Neck long	-45.58~34.08	-13.04	30	10.17	-58.85~2.80	-34.38	0	-
穗粗 Spike width	-26.44~42.41	-0.54	40	20.66	-0.31~41.74	21.80	119	14.28
有效穗数 Productive ear number	0~266.67	67.52	91	89.03	0~266.67	67.52	91	76.45
穗重 Ear weight	-48.50~82.91	0.23	54	23.26	-29.49~115.70	33.33	107	10.44
穗粒重 Grain weight per ear	-50.63~139.52	7.06	62	33.62	-38.17~109.01	25.78	90	28.43
千粒重 1000-grain weight	-18.92~16.91	-2.45	41	6.47	-31.05~9.50	-20.69	0	-
产量Yield	-29.5~178.84	57.09	114	53.22	-12.57~129.71	57.00	118	52.44

组合 Combination	产量Yield
组合 Combination	GCA_R	GCA_S	SCA	CE(%)
S28×R1	5.55	9.22	31.54	129.71
S35×R3	-1.23	7.94	39.35	129.34
S24×R3	-1.23	8.41	27.19	110.97
S12×R3	-1.23	10.44	24.31	109.63
S9×R2	-0.87	10.28	23.16	108.14
S23×R1	5.55	4.00	22.30	107.01
S34×R1	5.55	2.02	24.11	106.74
S27×R1	5.55	14.07	10.57	104.39
S13×R1	5.55	6.94	15.93	101.66
S25×R3	-1.23	14.22	14.75	100.57

Analysis of Parental Combining Ability of New Sterile Lines in Foxtail Millet

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

Abstract

Cite this article

share this article

Figures/Tables 7

References 23

Related Articles 4

Metrics

Comments

Recommended 10

性状Character	超亲优势Heterobeltiosis				竞争优势Competitive edge
性状Character	GCA_R	GCA_S	GCA_R+S	SCA	GCA_R	GCA_S	GCA_R+S	SCA
株高Plant height	-0.47^**	0.68^**	0.17	0.52^**	0.60^**	0.64^**	0.87^**	0.48^**
穗长Ear length	-0.38^**	0.44^**	0.05	0.53^**	0.46^**	0.54^**	0.73^**	0.66^**
脖长Neck long	-0.19^*	0.35^**	0.03	0.40^**	0.60^**	0.47^**	0.78^**	0.55^**
穗粗Spike width	0.77^**	0.22^*	0.57^**	0.33^**	0.30^**	0.53^**	0.61^**	0.79^**
有效穗数Productive ear number	0.36^**	0.60^**	0.69^**	0.71^**	0.36^**	0.60^**	0.69^**	0.71^**
穗重Ear weight	-0.37^**	0.59^**	0.043	0.64^**	0.23^*	0.65^**	0.70^**	0.72^**
穗粒重Grain weight per ear	-0.50^**	0.49^**	0.23^*	0.55^**	0.27^**	0.62^**	0.68^**	0.74^**
千粒重1000-grain weight	-0.23^*	0.40^**	0.10	0.41^**	0.52^**	0.56^**	0.78^**	0.57^**
产量Yield	-0.57^**	0.40^**	-0.01	0.56^**	0.19^*	0.56^**	0.58^**	0.80^**

[1]	Zhihua Li,Tingting Mu,Xin Liu,Huixia Li,Gang Tian. Combining Ability Analysis of Main Agronomic Characters of Four Millet Sterile Lines [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(3): 61-67.
[2]	Yingfen Jiang,Xinjie Wu,Weixin Fei,Fengxiang Chen. Research Progress on Recessive Genic Male Sterility of Rapeseed [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(2): 11-16.
[3]	Jie Xu,Lei Pan,Shuai Yang,Yunsong Chen,Shengbin Deng,Xiaodong Yang,Wenguang Ma. Analysis of Genetic Effects of Potassium Content in Flue-Cured Tobacco [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(2): 30-34.
[4]	Xianlin Ni,Wenjing Long,Ganlin Zhao,Tianpeng Liu,Jiongling Hu,Guoxiang Ding. The Relationship between Combining Ability and Heterosis of Main Agronomic Traits in Glutinous Sorghum [J]. Crops, 2016, 32(5): 50-55.