Crops ›› 2016, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (5): 50-55.doi: 10.16035/j.issn.1001-7283.2016.05.009

Previous Articles     Next Articles

The Relationship between Combining Ability and Heterosis of Main Agronomic Traits in Glutinous Sorghum

Ni Xianlin1,2,Long Wenjing1,2,Zhao Ganlin1,2,Liu Tianpeng1,2,Hu Jiongling1,2,Ding Guoxiang1,2   

  1. 1 Rice and Sorghum Institute,Sichuan Academy of Agricultural Sciences,Deyang 618000,Sichuan,China
    2 Sichuan Branch of Chinese National Center for Sorghum Improvement,Luzhou 646000,Sichuan,China
  • Received:2016-06-23 Revised:2016-08-18 Online:2016-10-15 Published:2018-08-26
  • Contact: Guoxiang Ding

RichHTML

2

PDF (PC)

112

Abstract:

The combining ability, heterosis and their inter-relationships of ten main agronomic traits were analyzed by 35 glutinous sorghum hybrids crossed with 7 sterile lines and 5 restorer lines by way of incomplete diallele cross (NCII) design. The results showed that the heredity of all the ten traits was mainly controlled by additive genes, and non-additive genes were also played an important role in the expression of most of the traits. Significant heterosis values were observed for most traits studied. Significant correlations were found between general combining ability (GCA) effects and control heterosis, total combining ability effects (TCA) and control heterosis, and the correlation coefficients was big enough to predict control heterosis in the study. The mid-parent heterosis of most traits was significantly related to general combining ability, specific combining ability (SCA) and total combining ability, and the SCA was significantly greater than GCA and TCA, but the correlation coefficients obtained in the stuy was too small to predict mid-parent hererosis, which indicated that the relationship between combining ability and mid-parent heterosis needed further study.

Key words: Glutinous sorghum, Agronomic traits, Combining ability, Heterosis, Correlation

Table 1

Variance analysis for different traits in glutinous sorghum"

性状Traits 区组Block 组合Crosses 父本P1 母本P2 P1×P2 误差Error
自由度Df 2 34 4 6 24 68
株高PH 45.75 797.57** 1 783.15** 2 807.64** 130.78** 41.30
穗长PL 0.61 9.30** 10.36* 34.11** 2.91** 0.29
生育期GD 1.52 10.16** 52.69** 16.84** 1.41** 0.55
穗柄长LES 0.70 22.23** 44.07** 77.26** 4.84** 1.37
茎粗SD 0.01 0.03** 0.01 0.12** 0.01** 0.00
一级枝梗数PBN 118.86 293.13** 447.75* 814.14** 137.11 134.69
二级枝梗数SBN 13 328.70 20 263.38** 49 502.32** 37 422.79* 11 100.37 9 801.29
第三叶面积 TLA 3 036.47 6 792.91** 16 633.32** 20 543.44** 1 715.21 1 429.67
千粒重TSW 1.24 29.70** 96.08** 46.94* 14.33** 0.42
穗粒重GWP 33.33 342.79** 819.86* 231.62 291.07** 11.00

Table 2

General combining ability effects of parental lines"

亲本
Parent		 株高
PH		 穗长
PL		 生育期
GD		 茎粗
SD		 穗柄长LES 一级枝梗数PBN 二级枝梗数
SBN		 第三叶面积
TLA		 千粒重
TSW		 穗粒重GWP
恢1 Hui1 10.37 -0.46 -1.47 -0.02 -1.87 1.91 34.84 -10.80 -0.81 -4.55
0993R 9.50 -0.16 -1.94 -0.01 0.27 -1.51 -14.21 -31.28 -1.94 -3.01
1045R -8.73 0.64 0.94 -0.02 1.74 -0.31 -12.89 0.30 2.23 3.21
1050R -4.26 0.80 0.94 0.04 -1.02 6.25 58.65 45.39 -1.84 -5.13
099R -6.89 -0.83 1.53 0.01 0.88 -6.34 -66.39 -3.61 2.35 9.48
45A -3.77 2.08 0.31 0.05 -2.03 -7.03 -34.04 38.55 0.29 6.46
72A 6.37 -0.92 -1.22 -0.05 0.60 -3.34 -31.34 -8.38 -0.73 -2.08
18A -22.34 -1.20 -1.29 -0.14 4.69 -8.72 -57.00 -27.18 -2.81 -5.96
407A 2.38 0.50 0.45 0.06 -0.05 3.26 25.16 10.75 -1.01 -0.40
0655A 1.77 1.55 -0.65 0.02 -0.24 2.38 49.31 -13.98 -0.04 3.09
3246A 22.61 0.09 1.25 0.12 -1.48 13.14 75.75 53.09 2.11 -1.14
2S -7.00 -2.09 1.15 -0.06 -1.49 0.32 -27.85 -52.85 2.19 0.02

Table 3

Special combining ability effects of crosses"

性状Traits 极大值Max 组合
Crosses		 极小值Min 组合
Crosses
株高PH 12.55 3246A/1050R -9.57 45A/1050R
穗长PL 1.57 45A/1050R -1.57 72A/恢1
生育期GD 1.27 407A/恢1 -1.14 407A/1050R
茎粗SD 0.12 2S/0993R -0.08 2S/1045R
穗柄长LES 2.41 2S/恢1 -2.92 18A/恢1
一级枝梗数PBN 12.17 72A/1050R -18.18 72A/0993R
二级枝梗数SBN 99.49 2S/0993R -172.83 72A/0993R
第三叶面积TLA 44.64 45A/1045R -44.67 72A/恢1
千粒重TSW 3.51 407A/099R -4.28 407A/1045R
穗粒重GWP 12.97 3246A/恢1 -19.54 407A/1045R

Table 4

Heterosis of thirty-five crosses for 10 measured traits"

竞争优势 Control heterosis(CH, %) 中亲优势 Mid-parent heterosis (MPH, %)
性状
Traits		 变幅
Range		 均值
Mean		 正(负)组合数
No. of crosses with positive
(negative) heterosis		 变幅
Range		 均值
Mean		 正(负)组合数
No. of crosses with Positive
(negative) heterosis
株高PH -49.59~-26.10 -37.97 0(35) 9.61~49.06 -31.22 35(0)
穗长PL -19.15~0.46 -10.82 1(34) 5.88~23.65 -14.08 35(0)
生育期GP -7.23~-1.28 -3.67 0(35) -1.96~2.70 -0.39 22(13)
茎粗SD -13.44~13.18 1.72 24(11) -4.86~24.53 10.89 34(1)
穗柄长LES -33.28~-15.67 -28.19 0(35) 6.12~42.83 22.58 35(0)
一级枝梗数PBN -6.09~57.39 24.12 33(2) -17.48~17.82 1.17 18(17)
二级枝梗数SBN -14.60~30.26 10.67 27(8) -13.45~35.07 8.80 27(8)
第三叶面积TLA 13.13~52.06 31.18 35(0) 3.08~32.42 18.42 35(0)
千粒重TSW 9.64~74.59 34.38 35(0) -9.88~25.39 5.61 27(8)
穗粒重GWP -18.50~32.21 10.82 27(8) 4.49~97.10 51.39 35(0)

Table 5

Relationship between combining ability and heterosis"

相关系数
r		 GCA与竞争优势
GCA/CH		 SCA与竞争优势
SCA/CH		 总配合力与竞争优势
TCA/CH		 GCA与中亲优势
GCA/MPH		 SCA与中亲优势
SCA/MPH		 总配合力与中亲优势
TCA/MPH
株高PH 0.9431** 0.3371* 0.9998** 0.5819** 0.4103** 0.6868**
穗长PL 0.8816** 0.4719** 1.0000** -0.1184 0.6114** 0.1831
生育期GD 0.9192** 0.3621* 0.9863** 0.4502** 0.4858** 0.5794**
茎粗SD 0.9211** 0.3891* 1.0000** -0.2017 0.3906* -0.0325
穗柄长LES 0.9003** 0.4353** -0.5320** 0.3767* 0.3999* -0.2388
一级枝梗数PBN 0.8254** 0.2073 0.7946** 0.3993* 0.3475* 0.5264**
二级枝梗数SBN 0.8182** 0.2513 0.7971** -0.1168 0.2556 0.0675
第三叶面积TLA 0.9069** 0.4209* 0.9998** -0.0323 0.5642** 0.2087
千粒重TSW 0.8057** 0.5902** 0.9987** 0.3435* 0.8092** 0.7512**
穗粒重GWP 0.6348** 0.7727** 1.0000** 0.2325 0.6202** 0.6273**
[1] 柴岩, 万富世 . 中国小杂粮产业发展报告.北京: 中国农业科学技术出版社, 2007.
[2] 宋仁本, 卢峰, 卢庆善 , 等. 我国高粱生产演变及发展前景分析. 杂粮作物, 2002,22(4):216-218.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-0896.2002.04.013
[3] 倪先林, 张涛, 蒋开锋 , 等. 杂交稻特殊配合力与杂种优势、亲本间遗传距离的相关性. 遗传, 2009,31(8):849-854.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1005.2009.00849
[4] 韩东倩, 韩立朴, 薛帅 , 等. 基于能源利用的高粱配合力和杂种优势分析. 中国农业大学学报, 2012,17(1):26-32.
[5] 王立新, 成慧娟, 马尚耀 , 等. 粒用高粱新选亲本配合力分析. 作物杂志, 2014(6):56-60.
[6] 倪先林, 赵甘霖, 刘天朋 , 等. 杂交糯高粱主要农艺性状的配合力和遗传力研究. 江苏农业科学, 2011,39(3):90-93.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-1302.2011.03.032
[7] Prakash R, Ganesamurthy K . Combining ability for fodder yield and its components in sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.). Electronic Journal of Plant Breeding, 2010,1(2):124-28.
[8] 高士杰 . 高粱配合力的研究. 中国农业科学, 1984(4):26-32.
[9] 胡广群, 王文华, 孙克威 , 等. 高粱亲本系主要性状配合力的研究. 辽宁农业科学, 1995(2):19-22.
[10] Hariprasanna K, Rajendrakumar P, Patil J V . Parental selection for high heterosis in sorghum [Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench]-combining ability,heterosis and their inter-relationships. Crop Research, 2012,44(3):400-408.
[11] 马鸿图 . 高粱类型血缘及其与配合力的关系. 科学通报, 1974(12):556-558.
[12] 柯福来, 朱凯, 石永顺 , 等. 一般配合力相关性分析在粒用高粱亲本选育中的应用策略. 辽宁农业科学, 2014(3):39-41.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-1728.2014.03.011
[13] 赵甘霖, 丁国祥 . 基于AMMI模型的杂交高粱籽粒淀粉含量的配合力分析. 安徽农业科学, 2008,36(27):11701-11702.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0517-6611.2008.27.037
[14] 高士杰, 王方 . 中国高粱穗长的遗传与改良. 作物学报, 1991,17(1):76-78.
[15] 王艳秋, 卢峰, 邹剑秋 , 等. 群体改良法新育成高粱雄性不育系的配合力分析. 江苏农业科学, 2009,36(1):83-87.
[16] Belum V S, Reddy S, Ramesh P , et al. Combining ability and heterosis as influenced by male-sterility inducing cytoplasms in sorghum[Sorghum bicolor (L.) Moench]. Euphytica, 2007,54(1):53-164.
[17] 李金梅, 赵威军, 张福耀 , 等. 甜高粱抗倒伏性相关性状的配合力和遗传参数分析. 作物杂志, 2014(2):56-60.
[18] 杨代刚, 马雄风, 周晓箭 , 等. 陆地棉配合力与杂种优势、遗传距离的相关性分析. 棉花学报, 2012,24(3):191-198.
doi: 1002-7807（2012）03-0191-08
[19] 周开达, 黎汉云, 李仁瑞 , 等. 杂交水稻主要性状配合力、遗传力的初步研究. 作物学报, 1982,8(3):145-152.
[20] 王利民, 张建平, 党照 , 等. 胡麻两系杂交亲本的配合力及杂种优势分析. 中国农业科学, 2016,49(6):1047-1059.
[21] 朱海平, 彭少丹, 陈升位 , 等. 云南主栽油菜品种间的杂种优势及配合力分析. 云南农业大学学报, 2014,29(3):326-332.
[1] Chen Guangzhou, Wang Guangfu, Qu Jianzhou, Si Leiyong, . Study on Grain Dehydration Rate and#br# Correlation Analysis of Major Related#br# Characters in Different Maize Inbred Lines [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 33-39.
[2] Wang Lei, Zhang Xiangping, Li Runxi, Niu Xiaoxia, . Multivariate Analysis and Evaluation on Agronomic#br# Traits and Grain Amylopectin Content of Barley [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 71-76.
[3] Wu Ronghua, Zhuang Kezhang, Liu Peng, Zhang Chunyan. Response of Summer Maize Yield to#br# Meteorological Factors in Lunan Region [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 104-109.
[4] Xingchuan Zhang, Wenxuan Huang, Kuanyu Zhu, Zhiqin Wang, Jianchang Yang. Effects of Nitrogen Rates on the Nitrogen Use Efficiency and Agronomic Traits of Different Rice Cultivars [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 69-78.
[5] Bin Zhang,Jinxiu Li,Zhen Wang,Hao Feng,Jinbang Li. Correlation and Cluster Analysis of Agronomic Traits in Wheat Lines [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(3): 57-60.
[6] Zhihua Li,Tingting Mu,Xin Liu,Huixia Li,Gang Tian. Combining Ability Analysis of Main Agronomic Characters of Four Millet Sterile Lines [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(3): 61-67.
[7] Yingfen Jiang,Xinjie Wu,Weixin Fei,Fengxiang Chen. Research Progress on Recessive Genic Male Sterility of Rapeseed [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(2): 11-16.
[8] Jie Xu,Lei Pan,Shuai Yang,Yunsong Chen,Shengbin Deng,Xiaodong Yang,Wenguang Ma. Analysis of Genetic Effects of Potassium Content in Flue-Cured Tobacco [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(2): 30-34.
[9] Maolin Yue,Weirong Xue,Ruidong Zhang,Zhongxiao Yue,RuiZhou Lü,Pengyan Guo. Effects of Different Row Spaces on Agronomic Traits and Yield of Millet [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(2): 93-96.
[10] Ruixin Zhang,Tianbao Ren,Zhe Zhao,Gang Wen,Mingqin Zhao. Effects of Transplanting Date on Quality and Main Economic Characters of Cigar in Five Fingers Group [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(2): 148-153.
[11] Zhanning Gao,Hui Feng,Zhenggang Xue,Yongqian Yang,Shujie Wang,Zhengmao Pan. Analysis of Main Agronomic Traits of 28 Barley Varieties (Lines) [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(1): 77-82.
[12] Pengyan Guo,Caiping Wang,Jiecheng Ren,Jiping Zhao,Ying Xu,Maolin Yue. Genetic Diversity of Agronomic Traits of Mung Beans from Different Geographical Sources [J]. Crops, 2017, 33(6): 55-59.
[13] Shuguang Wang,Yugang Shi,Huawei Shi,Yaping Cao,Daizhen Sun. Research on Relationship between Photosynthetic Characteristics and Drought Resistance in Spring Wheat [J]. Crops, 2017, 33(6): 23-29.
[14] Jie Gao,Qingfeng Li,Can Wang,Guobing Zhang,Qiu Peng. Effects of Differrent Nitrogen Level on Material Production and Nitrogen Use Characteristics in Glutinous Sorghum [J]. Crops, 2017, 33(6): 126-130.
[15] Nannan Lu,Lihua Yan,Chongke Zheng,Haibo Yin,Shanli Guo,Xianzhi Xie. Effects of Salt Stress on Growth and Agronomic Traits of Yanfeng 47 and Yanjing 456 [J]. Crops, 2017, 33(5): 106-111.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] Guangcai Zhao,Xuhong Chang,Demei Wang,Zhiqiang Tao,Yanjie Wang,Yushuang Yang,Yingjie Zhu. General Situation and Development of Wheat Production[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 1 -7 .
[2] Baoquan Quan,Dongmei Bai,Yuexia Tian,Yunyun Xue. Effects of Different Leaf-Peg Ratio on Photosynthesis and Yield of Peanut[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 102 -105 .
[3] Xuefang Huang,Mingjing Huang,Huatao Liu,Cong Zhao,Juanling Wang. Effects of Annual Precipitation and Population Density on Tiller-Earing and Yield of Zhangzagu 5 under Film Mulching and Hole Sowing[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 106 -113 .
[4] Wenhui Huang, Hui Wang, Desheng Mei. Research Progress on Lodging Resistance of Crops[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 13 -19 .
[5] Yun Zhao,Cailong Xu,Xu Yang,Suzhen Li,Jing Zhou,Jicun Li,Tianfu Han,Cunxiang Wu. Effects of Sowing Methods on Seedling Stand and Production Profit of Summer Soybean under Wheat-Soybean System[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 114 -120 .
[6] Mei Lu,Min Sun,Aixia Ren,Miaomiao Lei,Lingzhu Xue,Zhiqiang Gao. Effects of Spraying Foliar Fertilizers on Dryland Wheat Growth and the Correlation with Yield Formation[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 121 -125 .
[7] Xiaofei Wang,Haijun Xu,Mengqiao Guo,Yu Xiao,Xinyu Cheng,Shuxia Liu,Xiangjun Guan,Yaokun Wu,Weihua Zhao,Guojiang Wei. Effects of Sowing Date, Density and Fertilizer Utilization Rate on the Yield of Oilseed Perilla frutescens in Cold Area[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 126 -130 .
[8] Pengjin Zhu,Xinhua Pang,Chun Liang,Qinliang Tan,Lin Yan,Quanguang Zhou,Kewei Ou. Effects of Cold Stress on Reactive Oxygen Metabolism and Antioxidant Enzyme Activities of Sugarcane Seedlings[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 131 -137 .
[9] Jie Gao,Qingfeng Li,Qiu Peng,Xiaoyan Jiao,Jinsong Wang. Effects of Different Nutrient Combinations on Plant Production and Nitrogen, Phosphorus and Potassium Utilization Characteristics in Waxy Sorghum[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 138 -142 .
[10] Na Shang,Zhongxu Yang,Qiuzhi Li,Huihui Yin,Shihong Wang,Haitao Li,Tong Li,Han Zhang. Response of Cotton with Vegetative Branches to Plant Density in the Western of Shandong Province[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 143 -148 .