Crops ›› 2019, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (1): 180-185.doi: 10.16035/j.issn.1001-7283.2019.01.029

;

Previous Articles     Next Articles

The Improved Effects of Planting Asparagus on Soil in Cold Desertification Area

Liping Mao1,Dongtang Wu1,Weimin Guo1,Jun Ren2   

  1. 1 Vegetable Research Institute, Shanxi Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Taiyuan 030031, Shanxi, China
    2 Institute of Crop Sciences, Shanxi Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Taiyuan 030031, Shanxi, China
  • Received:2018-07-24 Revised:2018-12-10 Online:2019-02-15 Published:2019-02-01
  • Contact: Jun Ren

RichHTML

4

PDF (PC)

147

Abstract:

In order to evaluate the effect of soil improvement by planting asparagus on soil in cold and sandy area, a field experiment was carried out in Youyu, Shuozhou, Shanxi Province. Four different planting year treatments of Asparagus as 1st, 2nd, 3rd, and 4th year since planting were set up and naked sandy soil before planting was used as the CK. Soil physical and chemical properties and Asparagus growth indexes were determined. Results were as follow: compared with CK, with the increase of planting years, soil clay and silt content increased, sand content decreased, soil bulk density decreased, soil water holding capacity increased. The values of pH and EC in soil decreased, organic matter, total nitrogen, available phosphorus and available potassium content increased. In the 4th year of planting Asparagus, compared with CK, four aspects changed significantly: (1) soil clay content increased to 29.8%, powder sand content increased to 12.6%, and the sand content reduced to 57.6%, bulk density reduced, water holding capacity increased, and soil transformed from loam type to clay type; (2) the pH of soil decreased by 0.75 units and the EC decreased by 0.08mS/cm; (3) soil organic matter content increased by 28.89%, total nitrogen content increased by 95.12%, available phosphorus content increased by 94.92%, available potassium content increased by 45.40%, soil fertility was significantly enhanced; (4) production of Asparagus reached 6 037.5kg/hm2 under this condition. Therefore, cultivation of Asparagus for 4 years continuously can improve the physical structure of soil, improve soil nutrients, reduce the degree of salinity, and can be used as one of the pioneer crops to improvement soil condition in cold desertification area, and achieve ecological benefits and economic benefits simultaneously.

Key words: Cold desertification area, Asparagus, Soil fertility, Soil texture, Salinity, Soil improvement

Table 1

Growth and development of Asparagus in different planting years"

处理 Treatment 地上部Aboveground 地下部Underground 产量
(kg/hm2)
Yield
株幅(m)
Plant
width		 株高(m)
Plant
height		 单株茎数 Stem number
per plant		 茎粗(cm)
Stem
diameter		 生育指数 Growth
index		 根系横径(m)
Root diameter		 根系纵深(m)
Root depth		 单株贮藏根数
Number of storage
root per plant		 贮藏根直径(cm)
Diameter of
storage root		 单株根系鲜重(kg)
Root fresh weight
per plant
T1 0.22d 0.41c 5.4c 0.17b 37.6d 0.42b 0.13d 29.6d 0.31c 0.05d 0
T2 0.62c 1.22b 7.6b 1.14a 1 057.0c 1.24c 0.20c 158.3c 0.45b 1.22c 0
T3 0.89b 1.75a 7.9b 1.22a 1 686.7b 1.59b 0.35b 345.1b 0.53a 1.81b 2 794.5b
T4 1.02a 1.78a 8.9a 1.28a 2 027.8a 1.82a 0.41a 622.3a 0.56a 2.84a 6 037.5a

Fig.1

Effects of Asparagus planting years on different grade particle content in sandy soil Different small letters indicate significant difference (P<0.05), the same below"

Fig.2

Effects of Asparagus planting years on field moisture capacity and soil bulk weight"

Fig.3

Effects of Asparagus planting years on soil EC and pH"

Fig.4

Effects of Asparagus planting years on soil fertility of sand"

[1] 李庭水 . “芦笋+林草”生态模式治理南方风沙化土地的研究. 南京:南京农业大学, 2004.
doi: 10.7666/d.Y679884
[2] 毛丽萍, 马蓉丽, 郭伟民 , 等. 冷凉沙化区芦笋防风固沙栽培技术. 中国蔬菜, 2014,1(6):86-87.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6346.2014.06.023
[3] 陈罡, 卢昱宇, 管安琴 , 等. 芦笋综合利用及耐盐性研究进展. 江西农业学报, 2014,26(12):50-53.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-8581.2014.12.013
[4] 张秀琰, 黄振刚, 孙范军 . 高寒地区绿芦笋引种试验. 内蒙古农业科技, 2017(4):35-36.
[5] 唐增海 . 芦笋在山西省北部的适应性研究. 山西林业科技, 2018,47(2):24-25.
[6] 陈光宇, 罗绍春, 占丰溪 , 等. 南方风沙化土地种植芦笋对土壤肥力的影响. 江西农业学报, 2002,14(2):58-61.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-8581.2002.02.011
[7] 彭柳林, 余艳锋, 周开洪 . 我国芦笋产业布局优化分析. 中国农业资源与区划, 2015,36(1):123-127.
doi: 10.7621/cjarrp.1005-9121.20150120
[8] 鲍士旦 . 土壤农化分析. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2000: 14-24.
[9] 鲁如坤 . 土壤农业化学分析方法. 北京: 中国农业科技出版社, 2002: 71.
[10] 蔡丽平, 谢锦升, 林锦仪 , 等. 南亚热带侵蚀赤红壤治理前后土壤肥力的变化. 浙江林学院学报, 2001,18(2):131-135.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-0756.2001.02.006
[11] 周德平, 褚长彬, 刘芳芳 , 等. 种植年限对设施芦笋土壤理化性状、微生物及酶活性的影响. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2012,18(2):459-466.
doi: 10.11674/zwyf.2012.11291
[12] 齐金艳 . 种松树苗木栽植对矿山污染土壤营养成分的影响. 防护林科技, 2016,149(2):24-25.
doi: 10.13601/j.issn.1005-5215.2016.02.009
[13] 沈浩 . 胡杨林下不同混交模式对土壤肥力的影响. 新疆环境保护, 2016,38(1):12-16.
[14] 曹岩坡, 戴鹏, 田建华 , 等. 盐胁迫对芦笋种子萌发的影响. 河北农业科学, 2012,16(4):39-41.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1088-1631.2012.04.011
[15] 张玉霞, 谭巍巍, 王艳树 , 等. 盐碱胁迫对芦笋抗氧化酶活性的影响. 内蒙古民族大学学报(自然科学版), 2006,21(2):165-168.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-0185.2006.02.013
[16] 厉广辉, 于继庆, 李书华 , 等. 中国芦笋栽培研究进展. 中国农学通报, 2016,32(7):37-42.
[17] 曹岩坡, 代鹏, 戴素英 , 等. 丛枝菌根真菌(AMF)对盐胁迫下芦笋幼苗生长及体内Na +、K +、Ca 2+、Mg 2+含量和分布的影响 . 生态学杂志, 2015,34(6):1699-1704.
[18] 曹岩坡, 代鹏, 戴素英 , 等. 丛枝菌根真菌(AMF)对盐胁迫下芦笋植株渗透调节物质及抗氧化酶活性的影响. 西南大学学报(自然科学版), 2017,39(5):43-48.
doi: 10.13718/j.cnki.xdzk.2017.05.007
[19] 谭巍巍, 李凤山, 张玉霞 , 等. 氯化钠和碳酸钠对芦笋的胁迫效应比较. 中国农学通报, 2006,22(7):322-325.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6850.2006.07.083
[20] 周德平, 褚长彬, 范洁群 , 等. 不同种植年限设施芦笋土壤微生物群落结构与功能研究. 土壤, 2014,46(6):1076-1082.
[1] Shi Liran,Bai Lirong,Lü Yaci,Zhao Minghui,Zhao Fengwu,Li Huimin. Analysis of Salt Tolerance at the Seedling Stage of Wheat Hybrid Variety Heng 9966 [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(6): 149-153.
[2] Li Song,Wanyou Liao,Yejun Wang,Youjian Su,Yongli Zhang,Yi Luo,Jun Liao,Weiguo Wu. Research Progress in Intercropping Upland Crops with Green Manure [J]. Crops, 2017, 33(6): 7-11.
[3] Xiuling Zheng,Jing Lin,Jian Xin,Lingxiao Li,Yan Qi,Min Chen. Response to NaCl Stress and Salinity Threshold by Two Species of Elaeagnus from the Same Provenance [J]. Crops, 2017, 33(4): 143-149.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] Guangcai Zhao,Xuhong Chang,Demei Wang,Zhiqiang Tao,Yanjie Wang,Yushuang Yang,Yingjie Zhu. General Situation and Development of Wheat Production[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 1 -7 .
[2] Baoquan Quan,Dongmei Bai,Yuexia Tian,Yunyun Xue. Effects of Different Leaf-Peg Ratio on Photosynthesis and Yield of Peanut[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 102 -105 .
[3] Xuefang Huang,Mingjing Huang,Huatao Liu,Cong Zhao,Juanling Wang. Effects of Annual Precipitation and Population Density on Tiller-Earing and Yield of Zhangzagu 5 under Film Mulching and Hole Sowing[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 106 -113 .
[4] Wenhui Huang, Hui Wang, Desheng Mei. Research Progress on Lodging Resistance of Crops[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 13 -19 .
[5] Yun Zhao,Cailong Xu,Xu Yang,Suzhen Li,Jing Zhou,Jicun Li,Tianfu Han,Cunxiang Wu. Effects of Sowing Methods on Seedling Stand and Production Profit of Summer Soybean under Wheat-Soybean System[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 114 -120 .
[6] Mei Lu,Min Sun,Aixia Ren,Miaomiao Lei,Lingzhu Xue,Zhiqiang Gao. Effects of Spraying Foliar Fertilizers on Dryland Wheat Growth and the Correlation with Yield Formation[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 121 -125 .
[7] Xiaofei Wang,Haijun Xu,Mengqiao Guo,Yu Xiao,Xinyu Cheng,Shuxia Liu,Xiangjun Guan,Yaokun Wu,Weihua Zhao,Guojiang Wei. Effects of Sowing Date, Density and Fertilizer Utilization Rate on the Yield of Oilseed Perilla frutescens in Cold Area[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 126 -130 .
[8] Pengjin Zhu,Xinhua Pang,Chun Liang,Qinliang Tan,Lin Yan,Quanguang Zhou,Kewei Ou. Effects of Cold Stress on Reactive Oxygen Metabolism and Antioxidant Enzyme Activities of Sugarcane Seedlings[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 131 -137 .
[9] Jie Gao,Qingfeng Li,Qiu Peng,Xiaoyan Jiao,Jinsong Wang. Effects of Different Nutrient Combinations on Plant Production and Nitrogen, Phosphorus and Potassium Utilization Characteristics in Waxy Sorghum[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 138 -142 .
[10] Na Shang,Zhongxu Yang,Qiuzhi Li,Huihui Yin,Shihong Wang,Haitao Li,Tong Li,Han Zhang. Response of Cotton with Vegetative Branches to Plant Density in the Western of Shandong Province[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 143 -148 .