Crops ›› 2019, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (5): 135-142.doi: 10.16035/j.issn.1001-7283.2019.05.023

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Interaction of Film Mulching and Nitrogen Application on Yield, Water and Nitrogen Use Efficiency of Sorghum

Liang Xiaohong,Zhang Ruidong,Huang Minjia,Liu Jing,Cao Xiong   

  1. Institute of Economic Crops, Shanxi Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Fenyang 032200, Shanxi, China
  • Received:2019-03-17 Revised:2019-07-26 Online:2019-10-15 Published:2019-11-07
  • Contact: Xiong Cao

Abstract:

The purpose of our study was to explore the water and nitrogen use efficiency of mechanized sorghum under film mulching on dry land. A field experiment using Jinza No.34 and Jinza No.35 as testing materials was carried out from 2015 to 2016 to study the effects of two cultivation measures (B1: un-mulched and B2: film mulching) and three nitrogen levels (C1: 0kg/hm 2, C2: 225kg/hm 2, C3: 450kg/hm 2) on soil water storage of different soil depths during the different growth periods, yield and water and nitrogen use efficiency of sorghum. The results showed that film mulching effectively improved 0-60cm soil layer water storage at different growth periods of sorghum, but there was no difference among three nitrogen levels in 0-60cm soil layer water storage. Compared to the un-mulched treatments, the grain yield was increased by 11.63% in film mulching treatments. It was increased 12.03% in 2015 and 11.17% in 2016. There was no significant difference in yield between different nitrogen levels and the interplay of nitrogen levels×varieties, nitrogen levels×film mulch method. But film mulching could effectively improve the utilization ratio of the nitrogen, the nitrogen fertilizer partial productivity of the treatments of N application of 225kg/hm 2 with film mulching were significantly higher than that of the other treatments. The water use efficiency (WUE) and precipitation production efficiency in the dry year were significantly higher than that in the wet year. Compared to the un-mulched treatments, the film mulching treatment increased WUE by 15.93% in 2015 and 12.21% in 2016, respectively. The WUE of the treatments of N fertilizer application rate of 225kg/hm 2 with film mulching was the highest for Jinza No.34 and Jinza No.35 in two years, and it had a better effect in the dry year with the WUE of 37.01kg/(mm?hm 2) and the yield increased by 19.076% for Jinza No.34, the WUE of 31.72kg/(mm?hm 2) and the yield increased by 38.286% for Jinza No.35. In conclusion, under the same experimental conditions, N fertilizer application rate of 225kg/ha with film mulching is the best combination of high yield and high water and nitrogen use efficiency for Jinza No.34 and Jinza No.35.

Key words: Film mulching, Nitrogen application, Sorghum, Yield, Water and nitrogen use efficiency

Table 1

Treatments of experiment"

品种
Variety
覆膜方式
Film mulch method
施氮量
N application
处理组合
Treatment combination
品种
Variety
覆膜方式
Film mulch method
施氮量
N application
处理组合
Treatment combination
A1 B1 C1 A1B1C1 A2 B1 C1 A2B1C1
C2 A1B1C2 C2 A2B1C2
C3 A1B1C3 C3 A2B1C3
B2 C1 A1B2C1 B2 C1 A2B2C1
C2 A1B2C2 C2 A2B2C2
C3 A1B2C3 C3 A2B2C3

Fig.1

Precipitation at experiment station of sorghum growth period in 2015"

Fig.2

Precipitation at experiment station of sorghum growth period in 2016"

Fig.3

Dynamical changes of soil water storage in 0-60cm soil layer of Jinza No.34"

Fig.4

Dynamical changes of soil water storage in 0-60cm soil layer of Jinza No.35"

Table 2

Yield comparison under single factor of variety, film mulching and N application kg/hm2"

品种Variety 产量Yield 覆膜方式Film mulch method 产量Yield 施氮量N application 产量Yield
A1 6 726.23a B1 5 991.80b C1 6 157.15a
A2 5 954.33b B2 6 688.75a C2 6 546.48a
C3 6 317.21a

Table 3

Yield comparison under the interaction of variety, film mulching and N application kg/hm2"

品种×覆膜方式
Variety×Film
mulch method
产量
Yield
品种×施氮量
Variety×
N application
产量
Yield
覆膜方式×施氮量
Film mulch method×
N application
产量
Yield
品种×覆膜方式×施氮量
Variety×Film mulch method×N application
产量
Yield
品种×覆膜方式×施氮量
Variety×Film mulch method×N application
产量
Yield
A1B1 6 477.88a A1C1 6 528.79a B1C1 5 884.20a A1B1C1 6 335.10abcde A2B1C1 5 433.30e
A1B2 6 974.58a A1C2 6 887.44a B1C2 6 017.11a A1B1C2 6 513.38abcd A2B1C2 5 520.85de
A2B1 5 505.73a A1C3 6 762.45a B1C3 6 074.10a A1B1C3 6 585.15abc A2B1C3 5 563.05cde
A2B2 6 402.93a A2C1 5 785.50a B2C1 6 430.09a A1B2C1 6 722.48ab A2B2C1 6 137.70bcde
A2C2 6 205.51a B2C2 7 075.84a A1B2C2 7 261.50a A2B2C2 6 890.18ab
A2C3 5 871.98a B2C3 6 560.33a A1B2C3 6 939.75ab A2B2C3 6 180.90bcde

Table 4

Effects of different treatments on yield, water and nitrogen use efficiency of sorghum in different years"

处理
Treatment
产量
Yield (kg/hm2)
耗水量
Water consumption (mm)
水分利用效率
WUE [kg/(hm2·mm)]
生育期降水生产效率
Production efficiency of precipitation
in growth stage [kg/(hm2·mm)]
年降水生产效率
Production efficiency of annual
precipitation [kg/(hm2·mm)]
氮肥偏生产力
NFPP (kg/kg)
2015 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 两年平均值Two year average value
A1B1C1 7 076.85bc 5 593.35bcd 232.03abc 590.28a 30.51cd 9.47cd 33.59b 10.83bcd 21.29bc 8.47bcd -
A1B2C1 7 497.15ab 5 947.80abcd 228.23bc 583.57a 32.91abc 10.19abc 35.58ab 11.51abcd 22.56ab 9.01abcd -
A1B1C2 7 246.65b 5 780.10abcd 233.25abc 592.30a 31.09bcd 9.76bcd 34.39b 11.19abcd 21.80b 8.76abcd 28.95b
A1B2C2 8 277.45a 6 245.55ab 223.74c 585.38a 37.01a 10.67abc 39.29a 12.08ab 24.90a 9.46ab 32.27a
A1B1C3 7 468.05ab 5 702.25abcd 231.27bc 586.31a 32.38abc 9.73bcd 35.45ab 11.04abcd 22.47ab 8.64abcd 14.64de
A1B2C3 7 868.40ab 6 011.10abc 221.71c 582.83a 35.50ab 10.32abc 37.35ab 11.63abc 23.67ab 9.11abc 15.42d
A2B1C1 5 683.20e 5 183.40d 242.38ab 590.89a 23.47e 8.77d 26.97de 10.03d 17.10de 7.85d -
A2B2C1 6 345.30cd 5 930.10abcd 235.31abc 587.14a 27.06de 10.10abcd 30.12cd 11.48abcd 19.09cd 8.98abcd -
A2B1C2 5 420.55e 5 621.15bcd 236.31abc 592.56a 22.95e 9.49cd 25.73e 10.88bcd 16.31e 8.51bcd 24.54c
A2B2C2 7 350.30b 6 430.05a 231.72bc 587.29a 31.72bcd 10.95ab 34.89b 12.44a 22.11b 9.74a 30.62ab
A2B1C3 5 685.00de 5 441.10cd 246.68a 586.90a 23.06e 9.29cd 26.98de 10.53cd 17.10de 8.24cd 12.36e
A2B2C3 5 882.85de 6 478.95a 233.20abc 580.38a 25.29e 11.16a 27.92de 12.54a 17.70de 9.82a 13.66de

Table 5

Effects of different treatments on water saving and yield increased of sorghum in growth stage"

品种
Variety
覆盖方式
Mulch
method
施氮量
N
application
单位产量
Per kilogram of grain
单位耗水量
Per cubicmeter of water consumption
节水量(m3/kg)
Water saved
节水率(%)
Water saving rate
增产量(kg/m3)
Yield increased
增产率(%)
Yield increased rate
2015 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016 2015 2016
A1 B1 C1 - - - - - - - -
B2 C1 0.002 0.007 7.153 7.028 2.350 0.716 7.704 7.559
B1 C2 - - - - - - - -
B2 C2 0.005 0.009 16.020 8.534 5.927 0.910 19.076 9.330
B1 C3 - - - - - - - -
B2 C3 0.003 0.006 9.012 5.701 3.198 0.588 9.904 6.045
A2 B1 C1 - - - - - - - -
B2 C1 0.006 0.015 13.046 13.147 3.518 1.328 15.003 15.137
B1 C2 - - - - - - - -
B2 C2 0.001 0.014 27.686 13.358 8.782 1.462 38.286 15.417
B1 C3 - - - - - - - -
B2 C3 0.004 0.018 8.646 16.952 2.181 1.892 9.465 20.417
[1] 山仑, 徐炳成 . 论高粱的抗旱性及在旱区农业中的地位. 中国农业科学, 2009,42(7):2342-2348.
[2] Nawaz K, Iqra A T, Hussain K , et al. Induction of salt tolerance in two cultivars of sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.) by exogenous application of proline at seedling stage. World Applied Sciences Journal, 2010,10(1):93-99.
[3] 赵春明 . 山西省干旱缺水趋势及旱地农业技术发展. 中国农业资源与区划, 2005,26(3):45-48.
[4] 张岁岐, 山仑 . 植物水分利用效率及其研究进展. 干旱地区农业研究, 2002,20(4):1-5.
[5] 朱兴平, 李永红 . 雨水利用的理论与实践-对干旱半干旱区农业可持续发展之路的探索. 水土保持通报, 1997,17(4):32-36.
[6] 崔福柱, 郭秀卿, 郝建平 , 等. 渗水地膜覆盖对高粱生育期及产量的影响. 山西农业科学, 2007,35(8):59-61.
[7] 王俊, 李凤民, 宋秋华 , 等. 地膜覆盖对土壤水温和春小麦产量形成的影响. 应用生态学报, 2003,14(2):205-210.
[8] 高慧洲, 谢英荷, 李廷亮 , 等. 覆膜对旱地冬小麦产量与土壤水分动态的影响. 山西农业科学, 2016,44(2):1793-1795,1869.
[9] 曹寒, 吴淑芳, 冯浩 , 等. 不同覆膜种植对土壤水热和冬小麦产量的影响. 水土保持研究, 2015,22(6):110-115.
[10] 杨长刚, 柴守玺, 常磊 . 半干旱雨养区不同覆膜方式对冬小麦土壤水分利用及产量的影响. 生态学报, 2015,35(8):2676-2685.
doi: 10.5846/stxb201406051158
[11] 杨海迪, 海江波, 贾志宽 , 等. 不同地膜周年覆盖对冬小麦土壤水分及利用效率的影响. 干旱地区农业研究, 2011,29(2):27-34.
[12] 高艳梅, 孙敏, 高志强 , 等. 不同降水年型旱地小麦覆盖对产量及水分利用效率的影响. 中国农业科学, 2015,48(18):3589-3599.
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2015.18.003
[13] 崔琳琳 . 覆膜对土壤水分和玉米产量的影响. 水利科技与经济, 2014,20(6):104-106.
[14] 赵财, 陈桂平, 柴强 , 等. 不同灌水水平下少耕地膜覆盖对玉米农田土壤温度和水分利用效率的影响. 干旱地区农业研究, 2017,35(1):152-157.
[15] 张超, 吴杨, 贾志宽 , 等. 半干旱区不同秋覆膜方式对土壤水分及春玉米光合特性的影响. 干旱地区农业研究, 2017,35(2):39-45.
[16] 李士敏, 胡朝风, 李静 . 不同覆膜方式对高粱生长及产量的影响. 耕作与栽培, 2015(3):33-34.
[17] 陈竹君, 刘春光, 周建斌 , 等. 不同水肥条件对小麦生长及养分吸收的影响. 干旱地区农业研究, 2001,19(3):32-34.
[18] 呼瑞梅, 崔凤娟, 王振国 , 等. 不同施氮量、种植密度及灌水时期对高粱产量的影响. 现代农业科技, 2012(4):62-63.
[19] 曹雄, 梁晓红, 黄敏佳 , 等. 不同栽培措施对高粱产量的影响. 中国农学通报, 2015,31(3):126-132.
[20] 辛宗绪, 赵术伟, 孔凡信 , 等. 氮肥施入量对高粱生长发育和产量的影响. 现代农业科技, 2014(8):11-12.
[21] 罗付香, 林超文, 涂士华 , 等. 氮肥形态和地膜覆盖对坡耕地玉米产量和土壤氮素流失的影响. 水土保持学报, 2012,26(6):11-16.
[22] 葛均筑, 李淑娅, 钟新月 , 等. 施氮量与地膜覆盖对长江中游春玉米产量性能及氮肥利用效率的影响. 作物学报, 2014,40(6):1081-1092.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2014.01081
[23] 李强, 王朝辉, 李福翠 , 等. 氮肥管理与地膜覆盖对旱地冬小麦产量和氮素利用效率的影响. 作物学报, 2014,40(1):93-100.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2014.00093
[24] 赵晓东, 李廷亮, 谢英荷 , 等. 覆膜对旱地麦田土壤水分及氮素平衡的影响. 生态学报, 2018,38(5):1550-1559.
doi: 10.5846/stxb201702100233
[25] 周景春, 苏玉杰, 张存玲 , 等. 0~50cm土壤含水量与降水和蒸发的关系分析. 中国土壤与肥料, 2007(6) : 23-27.
[26] Gan Y T, Siddique K H M, Turner N C , et al. Chapter seven-ridge-furrow mulching systems-an innovative for boosting crop productivity in semiarid rain-fed environments. Advances in Agronomy, 2013,118:429-476.
[1] Zhang Yanhua,Chang Xuhong,Wang Demei,Tao Zhiqiang,Wang Yanjie,Yang Yushuang,Zhao Guangcai. Effects of Zinc Topdressing Fertilizer on Yield and Quality of Wheat under Different Soil Conditions [J]. Crops, 2019, 35(5): 109-113.
[2] Ren Yongfeng,Lu Zhanyuan,Zhao Peiyi,Gao Yu,Liu Guanghua,Li Yanfang. Effects of Different Planting Methods on Water Utilization and Yield of Potato in Dryland [J]. Crops, 2019, 35(5): 120-124.
[3] Chen Li,Zhang Luxin,Wu Feng,Li Zhen,Long Xingzhou,Yang Yurui,Yin Baozhong. Effects of Wheat-Maize Double Crops Rotational Tillage on Soil Characteristics and Crop Yield in Hebei Plain [J]. Crops, 2019, 35(5): 143-150.
[4] Jiang Lina,Zhang Yawen,Zhu Yalin,Zhao Lingxiao. Effects of Nitrogen Application on Dry Matter Accumulation, Transport and Yield in Different Wheat Varieties [J]. Crops, 2019, 35(5): 151-158.
[5] Dong Zhiqiang,Wang Mengmeng,Li Hongyi,Xue Xiaoping,Pan Zhihua,Hou Yingyu,Chen Chen,Li Nan,Li Manhua. Applicability Assessment of WOFOST Model of Growth and Yield of Summer Maize in Shandong Province [J]. Crops, 2019, 35(5): 159-165.
[6] Wang Jinsong,Dong Erwei,Jiao Xiaoyan,Wu Ailian,Bai Wenbin,Wang Lige,Guo Jun,Han Xiong,Liu Qingshan. Effects of Different Planting Patterns on Yield and Nutrient Absorption of Sorghum Jinnuo 3 [J]. Crops, 2019, 35(5): 166-172.
[7] Zhao Zhun,Qi Juncang,Li Jian,Guo Yan,Ling Jiangrui,Li Huqing. Influence of Mowing Stages on Hay Yield and Fermentation Quality of Spring Barley [J]. Crops, 2019, 35(5): 180-185.
[8] Ma Yifeng,Liang Qian,Ge Junzhu,Xin Decai. Comparison of Yield Formation Between Winter Wheat Jimai 22 and Spring Wheat Jinqiang 8 [J]. Crops, 2019, 35(5): 192-195.
[9] Liu Xingye,Xing Baolong,Wu Ruixiang,Wang Guimei,Liu Fei. Main Agronomic Traits Variation and Its Effects on Yield Composition of Mung Bean in Northern Shanxi Province [J]. Crops, 2019, 35(5): 69-75.
[10] Ma Fanfan,Xing Sulin,Gan Manqin,Liu Peishi,Huang Yu,Gan Xiaoyu,Ma Youhua. Effects of Organic Fertilizer Substituting for Chemical Fertilizer on Rice Yield, Soil Fertility and Nitrogen and Phosphorus Loss in Farmland [J]. Crops, 2019, 35(5): 89-96.
[11] Liu Xiaoya,Zhang Lifeng,Zhang Jizong,Shi Wenbin,Zhang Peiyue. Adapt Ability of Brassica napus to Cold Environment in Bashang of North China [J]. Crops, 2019, 35(5): 97-103.
[12] Yan Wei,Li Guolong,Li Zhi,Cao Yang,Zhang Shaoying. Effects of Nitrogen Application Rate and Planting Density Interaction on Photosynthetic Characteristics and Root Yield of Sugar Beet under Full-Film Mulching in Arid Regions [J]. Crops, 2019, 35(4): 100-106.
[13] Wan Xiaoju,Zhang Guoqiang,Wang Keru,Xie Ruizhi,Shen Dongping,Chen Jianglu,Liu Chaowei,Li Shaokun. Effects of Plastic Film Mulching and Drip Irrigation on Spring Maize in Northern Xinjiang [J]. Crops, 2019, 35(4): 107-112.
[14] Qi Deqiang,Zhao Jingjing,Feng Naijie,Zheng Dianfeng,Liang Xiaoyan. Effects of S3307 and DTA-6 on Sugar Metabolism and Yield of Potato Leaves and Tubers [J]. Crops, 2019, 35(4): 148-153.
[15] Abudukadier Kuerban,Xia Dong,Zhang Jusong,Cui Jianping,Guo Rensong,Lin Tao. Effects of Drip Irrigation Frequency on Yield and Quality of Chemical Defoliated Cotton [J]. Crops, 2019, 35(4): 113-119.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] Wang Haitao,Liu Cunjing,Tang Liyuan,Zhang Sujun,Li Xinghe,Cai Xiao,Zhang Xiangyun,Zhang Jianhong. Status and Developmental Tendency of Hybrid Cotton in Hebei Province[J]. Crops, 2019, 35(5): 1 -8 .
[2] Meng Fanlai,Guo Huachun. Effects of Enhanced UV-B on Photosynthetic Characteristics and UV-Absorbing Compounds of Sweet Potato[J]. Crops, 2019, 35(5): 114 -119 .
[3] Hua Yuhui,Gao Zhiqiang. Hyperspectral Estimation of SPAD Values in Different Varieties of Autumn Maize[J]. Crops, 2019, 35(5): 173 -179 .
[4] Ren Yongfeng,Lu Zhanyuan,Zhao Peiyi,Gao Yu,Liu Guanghua,Li Yanfang. Effects of Different Planting Methods on Water Utilization and Yield of Potato in Dryland[J]. Crops, 2019, 35(5): 120 -124 .
[5] Shi Liran,Hao Hongbo,Cui Haiying,Li Mingzhe. Effects of Shading on Photosynthetic Characteristics and Rapid Chlorophyll Fluorescence Kinetic Characteristics of Foxtail Millet[J]. Crops, 2019, 35(5): 125 -128 .
[6] Li Chunxi,Li Sisi,Shao Yun,Ma Shouchen,Liu Qing,Weng Zhengpeng,Li Xiaobo. Effects of Organic Materials Returning on Enzyme Activities and Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Content in Wheat Field under Nitrogen-Reducing Conditions[J]. Crops, 2019, 35(5): 129 -134 .
[7] Chen Li,Zhang Luxin,Wu Feng,Li Zhen,Long Xingzhou,Yang Yurui,Yin Baozhong. Effects of Wheat-Maize Double Crops Rotational Tillage on Soil Characteristics and Crop Yield in Hebei Plain[J]. Crops, 2019, 35(5): 143 -150 .
[8] Jiang Lina,Zhang Yawen,Zhu Yalin,Zhao Lingxiao. Effects of Nitrogen Application on Dry Matter Accumulation, Transport and Yield in Different Wheat Varieties[J]. Crops, 2019, 35(5): 151 -158 .
[9] Dong Zhiqiang,Wang Mengmeng,Li Hongyi,Xue Xiaoping,Pan Zhihua,Hou Yingyu,Chen Chen,Li Nan,Li Manhua. Applicability Assessment of WOFOST Model of Growth and Yield of Summer Maize in Shandong Province[J]. Crops, 2019, 35(5): 159 -165 .
[10] Wang Jinsong,Dong Erwei,Jiao Xiaoyan,Wu Ailian,Bai Wenbin,Wang Lige,Guo Jun,Han Xiong,Liu Qingshan. Effects of Different Planting Patterns on Yield and Nutrient Absorption of Sorghum Jinnuo 3[J]. Crops, 2019, 35(5): 166 -172 .