Crops ›› 2023, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (1): 38-45.doi: 10.16035/j.issn.1001-7283.2023.01.006

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Research on the Effects of Gene Expression in Sugar Metabolism Pathway of Potato by Drought Stress and Rehydration

Liu Sujun1,2(), Meng Meilian3, Suriguga 1,2()   

  1. 1College of Life Science and Technology, Inner Mongolia Normal University, Hohhot 010022, Inner Mongolia, China
    2Key Laboratory of Biodiversity Conservation and Sustainable Utilization for College and University of Inner Mongolia Autonomous Region, Hohhot 010022, Inner Mongolia, China
    3College of Agronomy, Inner Mongolia Agricultural University, Hohhot 010020, Inner Mongolia, China
  • Received:2021-09-02 Revised:2021-12-15 Online:2023-02-15 Published:2023-02-22

RichHTML

9

PDF (PC)

204

Abstract:

High-throughput sequencing technique was used to study gene expression in potato metabolic pathway to clarify the damage of potato under drought stress and the protective effects of rehydration on potato. The experiment was carried out by pot method, in which drought treatment (40% soil relative water content, DT) and drought control (keep soil relative water content 70% for 14 days, CK) were set up, and in which rehydration treatment (the relative soil water content was 40% after being maintained for 14 days and then recovered to 70% of soil relative water content, RT) and rehydration control (relative soil water content was maintained at 70% for 21 days, RCK) were set up, and the effects of drought stress and rehydration treatment on starch and sugar metabolism pathways of potato were studied. The DT and CK treatments showed significant changes in the expression of 655 genes, of which 13 genes related to starch and sucrose metabolism pathways, including nine up-regulated genes and four down-regulated genes, and there were 11 enzymes involved. There were 644 differentially expressed genes between RT and RCK treatments, of which five genes related to starch and sucrose metabolism pathways, including three up-regulated genes and two down-regulated genes, and there were four enzymes involved. Changes in the expression of 13 genes in starch and sucrose metabolic pathways were occurred after drought stress, involving 11 enzymes in metabolic pathways, their functions were related to glycosyl hydrolase, sucrose synthase, glycosyl transferase, starch synthase and pectin esterase. After rehydration, the expression of five genes was still significantly different, affecting four enzymes. The number of genes with differential expression was reduced by eight, and the number of enzymes involved was reduced by seven, the decline was more obvious. Although it was not completely repaired, the overall repair effects was better and the compensation effect was significant.

Key words: Potato, Gene expression, High-throughput sequencing, Starch, Sugar metabolism

Fig.1

Test of RNA-Seq correlation between different treatments"

Table 1

Data of test summary"

处理
Treatment		 原始数据
Raw read		 处理后的数据
Clean read		 Q30
(%)		 匹配数（匹配率）
Total mapped
(rate of the mapped)		 交叉匹配数（交叉匹配率）
Multiply mapped
(rate of the multiply mapped)		 精准匹配数（精准匹配率）
Uniquely mapped
(rate of the uniquely mapped)
DT 52 481 881 49 863 309 92.03 31 377 909（62.93%） 1 101 135（2.21%） 30 276 774（60.72%）
CK 51 325 932 49 651 786 94.38 32 523 133（65.50%） 1 083 605（2.18%） 31 439 528（63.32%）
RT 45 604 570 44 071 743 94.25 28 817 595（65.39%） 912 019（2.07%） 27 905 575（63.32%）
RCK 47 472 519 45 593 043 94.17 29 233 720（64.12%） 977 935（2.14%） 28 255 785（61.97%）

Table 2

Number statistics of differential expression genes between different treatment groups"

项目Item DT vs CK RT vs RCK
差异表达基因总数Total number of differentially expressed genes 655 644
上调基因表达数量Number of up-regulated genes 349 149
下调基因表达数量Number of down-regulated genes 306 495

Fig.2

Venn diagram of DT vs CK and RT vs RCK"

Table 3

Statistics of gene expression with significant differences in starch and sucrose metabolism pathways"

表达发生变化的基因
Genes changed expression		 对应的酶编码
Correspond
enzyme code		 上调还是下调
Up-regulated or
down-regulated		 P值
P-value		 log2FoldChange 功能描述
Functional description
PGSC0003DMG402028252 3.2.1.26 下调 0.020165 -0.81723 糖基水解酶，C、N-末端
PGSC0003DMG400013546 2.4.1.13 上调 1.96E-06 0.78233 蔗糖合酶||糖基转移酶
PGSC0003DMG400006319 3.2.1.21 上调 0.044167 0.93775 糖苷水解酶，催化结构域，活性位点
PGSC0003DMG401017546 2.4.1.15、3.1.3.12 上调 0.021277 0.57240 海藻糖磷酸酶||糖基转移酶
PGSC0003DMG400009026
 2.7.7.27
 上调
 0.041903
 0.41162
 ADP-葡萄糖焦磷酸化酶||核苷酸-二磷酸-糖转移
酶||核苷酸基转移酶||葡萄糖-1-磷酸腺苷基转移酶
PGSC0003DMG402013540 2.4.1.21 上调 8.06E-06 1.75040 淀粉合酶，催化结构域
Novel02720 2.4.1.18 上调 0.000945 1.37100 1,4-α-葡聚糖支化酶2-2，叶绿素|淀粉分支酶II
PGSC0003DMG400007782 2.4.1.1 上调 0.014013 0.51617 糖基转移酶，家族35
PGSC0003DMG400033858 2.4.1.1 上调 0.028031 0.91992
Novel02357 5.4.2.2 上调 0.000539 0.71058 磷酸葡萄糖突变酶
PGSC0003DMG400009178 3.1.1.11 下调 0.040198 -0.85467 果胶酯酶抑制剂
PGSC0003DMG400030191 3.1.1.11 下调 0.002582 -1.41130 果胶裂解酶倍数||果胶酯酶，催化
PGSC0003DMG400002085 3.1.1.11 下调 0.005801 -1.46070 果胶酯酶抑制剂||果胶裂解酶倍数

Fig.3

Effects of drought stress on starch and sugar metabolism pathways Red indicates significant up-regulate of gene expression, green indicates significant down-regulation of gene expression. SSM: starch and sucrose metabolism; ASNSM: amino sugar and nucleotide sugar metabolism; UDGA: udp-d-galacturonate; PEC: pectin; PET: pectate; DGT: d-galacturonate; ASM: ascorbate metabolism; DGN: d-glucuronate; βDGS: β-d-glucuronoside; REM: retinol metabolism; UDGL: udp-d-glucuronate; UDX: udp-d-xylose; βDXL: 1,4-β-d-xylan; DXY: d-xylose; PGI: pentose and glucuronate interconversions; SUCE: sucrose (extracellular); αDG6P: α-d-glucose-6P; βDFSN: (2,6-β-D- Fructosyl)n; βDFSM: (2,6-β-d-fructosyl)m+n; βDFR: β-d-fructose; KET: 3-ketosucrose; SUC: sucrose; SUP: sucrose-6p; DFR: d-fructose; DGL: d-glucose; βGLU: 1,3-β-glucan; αDGL: α-d-glucose; βDGC: 1,4-β-d-glucan; CEL: cellulose; GLU: glucoside; βDG: β-d-glucose; GGL: gdp-glucose; CGL: cdp-glucose; αDGLP: α-d-glucose-1,6p2; βDFP: β-d-fructose-6p; αDGP: α-d-glucose-1p; ADPG: adp-glucose; DFT: d-fructose; UGL: udp-glucose; GLA: glycogen amylose; GLY: glycolysis; GLN: gluconeogenesis; αDG6P: α-d-glucose-6p; THL: trehalose; βDG6P: β-d-glucose-6p; βDGP: β-d-glucose-1p; DG6P: d-glucose-6p; TRP: trehalose-6p; TRE: trexyz; THLE: α,α-trehalose (extracellular); MAT: maltose; MAP: maltose-6'p; CYR: cyrclomaltodextrin; MALE: maltose(extracellular); MAL: maltodextrin; STG: starch glycogen; DEX: dextrin; α-MAP: α-maltose-1-p; ISO: isomaltose; CEB: cellobiose; CELL: cellotriose; CER: cellotetraose; CEP: cellopentaose; CEX: cellohexaose ; CET: celloheptaose. The same below"

Table 4

Statistics of gene expression with significant differences after rehydration"

表达发生变化的基因
Genes changed expression		 对应酶编码
Correspond
enzyme code		 上调还是下调
Up-regulated or
down-regulated		 P值
P-value		 log2FoldChange 功能描述
Functional description
PGSC0003DMG402028252 3.2.1.26 下调 0.020165 -0.81723 糖基水解酶，C、N-末端
PGSC0003DMG400026428 2.4.1.14 上调 0.007217 0.82062 蔗糖磷酸合酶||糖基转移酶
PGSC0003DMG400009177 3.1.1.11 下调 0.002437 -0.70394 果胶裂解酶||果胶酯酶抑制剂
Novel02278 2.4.1.18 上调 0.021939 0.92412 1,4-α-葡聚糖支化酶3，叶绿体/淀粉体
PGSC0003DMG400022307 2.4.1.18 上调 0.010419 0.88644 α-淀粉酶||糖苷水解酶||糖基水解酶

Fig.4

Effects of rehydration on starch and sugar metabolism pathways"

Fig.5

Histogram presentation of ten different expression genes 1：PGSC0003DMG400014867， 2：PGSC0003DMG400030713， 3：PGSC0003DMG400019063， 4：PGSC0003DMG400001774， 5：PGSC0003DMG400024278， 6：PGSC0003DMG400013702， 7：PGSC0003DMG400006448， 8：Nove101381， 9：PGSC0003DMG 400003563， 10：PGSC0003DMG400000425"

[1] 梁淑敏, 王颖, 潘哲超, 等. 不同栽培模式的土壤水热效应对马铃薯产量及结薯规律的影响. 作物杂志, 2018(3):90-96.
[2] 魏延安. 世界马铃薯产业发展现状及特点. 世界农业, 2005(3):29-32.
[3] 李勤志, 冯中朝. 中国马铃薯生产的经济分析. 广州: 暨南大学出版社, 2009.
[4] Anithakumari A M, Nataraja K, Visser R F C, et al. Genetic dissection of drought tolerance and recovery potential by quantitative trait locus mapping of a diploid potato population. Molecular Breeding, 2012, 30(3):1413-1429.
pmid: 23024597
[5] Levy D. Tuber yield and tuber quality of several potato cultivars as affected by seasonal high temperatures and by water deficit in a semi-arid environment. Potato Research, 1986, 29(1):95-107.
doi: 10.1007/BF02361984
[6] Dong S Y, Diane M, Beckles. Dynamic changes in the starch- sugar interconversion within plant source and sink tissues promote a better abiotic stress response. Journal of Plant Physiology, 2019, 234/235:80-93.
doi: 10.1016/j.jplph.2019.01.007
[7] Ball S, Colleoni C, Cenci U, et al. The evolution of glycogen and starch metabolism in eukaryotes gives molecular clues to understand the establishment of plastid endosymbiosis. Journal of Experimental Botany, 2011, 62(6):1775-1801.
doi: 10.1093/jxb/erq411 pmid: 21220783
[8] Cenci U, Nitschke F, Steup M, et al. Transition from glycogen to starch metabolism in Archaeplastida. Trends Plant Science, 2014, 19(1):18-28.
doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2013.08.004
[9] Kaura H, Kaura K, Gill G K. Modulation of sucrose and starch metabolism by salicylic acid induces thermotolerance in spring maize. Russian Journal of Plant Physiology, 2019, 66(5):771-777.
doi: 10.1134/S102144371905008X
[10] Hare P D, Cress W A, Van Staden J. Dissecting the roles of osmolyte accumulation during stress. Plant Cell Environment, 1998, 21(6):535-553.
doi: 10.1046/j.1365-3040.1998.00309.x
[11] Krasavina M S, Burmistrova N A, Raldugina G N. The role of carbohydrates in plant resistance to abiotic stresses. San Diego: Academic Press, 2014.
[12] Thomashow M F. Plant cold acclimation:freezing tolerance genes and regulatory mechanisms. Annual Review of Plant Biology, 1999, 50:571-599.
[13] Wanner L A, Junttila O. Cold-induced freezing tolerance in Arabidopsis. Plant Physiology, 1999, 120(2):391-400.
doi: 10.1104/pp.120.2.391 pmid: 10364390
[14] MacNeill G J, Mehrpouyan S, Minow M A A, et al. Starch as a source, starch as a sink:the bifunctional role of starch in carbon allocation. Journal of Experimental Botany, 2017, 68(16):4433-4453.
doi: 10.1093/jxb/erx291 pmid: 28981786
[15] Baroja-Fernández E, José Muñoz F, Montero M, et al. Enhancing sucrose synthase activity in transgenic potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) tubers results in increased levels of starch, ADP glucose and UDP glucose and total yield. Plant Cell Physiology, 2009, 50(9):1651-1662.
doi: 10.1093/pcp/pcp108
[16] Lutfiyya L L, Xu N F, Robert L D, et al. Phylogenetic and expression analysis of sucrose phosphate synthase isozymes in plans. Journal of Plant Physiology, 2007, 164(7):923-933.
pmid: 16876912
[17] Li J, Barojafernandez, Bahaji A, et al. Enhancing sucrose synthase activity results in increased levels of starch and ADP- glucose in maize (Zea mays L.) seed endosperms. Plant and Cell Physiology, 2013, 54(2):282-294.
doi: 10.1093/pcp/pcs180
[18] 卢合全, 沈法富, 刘凌霄, 等. 植物蔗糖合成酶功能与分子生物学研究进展. 中国农学通报, 2005, 21(7):34-37.
[19] 齐红岩, 李天来, 刘海涛, 等. 番茄不同部位中糖含量和相关酶活性的研究. 园艺学报, 2005, 32(2):239-243.
[20] 秦翠鲜, 桂意云, 陈忠良, 等. 植物蔗糖合成酶基因研究进展. 分子植物育种, 2018, 16(12):3907-3914.
[21] Fu H, Park W D. Sink- and vascular-associated sucrose synthase functions are encoded by different gene classes in potato. Plant Cell, 1995, 7(9):1369-1385.
doi: 10.1105/tpc.7.9.1369 pmid: 8589622
[22] Yang J C, Zhang J H, Wang Z Q, et al. Activities of key enzymes in sucrose-to-starch conversion in wheat grains subjected to water deficit during grain filling. Plant Physiology, 2004, 135(3):1621-1629.
pmid: 15235118
[23] Zhao C, Hua L N, Liu X F, et al. Sucrose synthase FaSS 1 plays an important role in the regulation of strawberry fruit ripening. Plant Growth Regulation, 2017, 81(1):175-181.
doi: 10.1007/s10725-016-0189-4
[24] Bai W Q, Xiao Y H, Zhao J, et al. Gibberellin overproduction promotes sucrose synthase expression and secondary cell wall deposition in cotton fibers. PLoS ONE, 2014, 9(5):e96537.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0096537
[25] Yu W P. Complete structures of three rice sucrose synthase isogenes and differential regulation of their expressions. Bioscience Biotechnology and Biochemistry, 1996, 60(2):233-239.
pmid: 9063969
[26] Gordon A J, Minchin F R, James C L, et al. Sucrose synthase in legume nodules is essential for nitrogen fixation. Plant Physiology, 1999, 129(3):867-878.
[27] Minoru K, Michihiro A, Susumu G, et al. KEGG for linking genomes to life and the environment. Nucleic Acids Research, 2008, 36(1):480-484.
[28] Gong L. Transcriptome profiling of the potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) plant under drought stress and water-stimulus conditions. PLoS ONE, 2015, 10(5):1-20.
[29] 刘素军, 蒙美莲, 陈有君. 干旱胁迫及复水对马铃薯类黄酮合成途径中关键酶及基因表达的影响. 植物生理学报, 2018, 54(1):81-91.
[30] Pomper K W, Breen P J. Levels of apoplastic solutes in developing strawberry fruit. Journal of Experimental Botany, 1995, 46(288):743-752.
doi: 10.1093/jxb/46.7.743
[31] Viol A R, Romberts A G, Haupt S, et al. Tuberization in potato involves a switch from apoplastic to symplastic phloem unloading. Plant Cell, 2001, 13(2):385-398.
pmid: 11226192
[1] Jia Zhengrong, Hao Jiali, Hao Yanfang, Bai Wenbin, Zhang Jianhua, Guo Ruifeng, Liu Yong. Effects of Four Bacillus Species on Yield and Quality of Sweet Potato at Different Stages [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(1): 170-175.
[2] Fu Ziping, Fan Yu, Lai Dili, Zhang Kaixuan, Zhu Jianfeng, Li Jiguang, Zhou Meiliang, Wang Junzhen. Effects of Debranched and Repeated Wet Heat Treatment on Content and Physicochemical Properties of Resistant Starch of Tartary Buckwheat [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(1): 52-57.
[3] Yang Yan, Xu Ningsheng, Pan Zhechao, Li Yanshan, Yang Qiongfen, Zhang Lei. Effects of Paclobutrazol and Nitrogen on Yield and Economic Benefit of Potato [J]. Crops, 2022, 38(6): 139-144.
[4] Wang Heshou. Effects of Different Nitrogen Application Rates on Nutritional Quality of Vegetable Sweet Potato [J]. Crops, 2022, 38(6): 208-213.
[5] Xu Yan, Niu Junfeng, Chen Lijun, Wang Shiqiang, Dong Zhongmin, Wang Zhezhi. Study of Rhizosphere Soil Microbial Changes of Atractylodes lancea Based on High-Throughput Sequencing [J]. Crops, 2022, 38(5): 221-228.
[6] Zheng Siyi, Yang Ye, Song Yuanhui, Hua Qin, Lin Quanxiang, Zhang Haitao, Cheng Zhijun. Identification and Fine Mapping of Sugary Endosperm Mutant m5788 in Rice (Oryza sativa L.) [J]. Crops, 2022, 38(4): 14-21.
[7] Xie Kuizhong, Sun Xiaohua, Luo Aihua, Liu Yongqiang, Tang Dejing, Zhu Yongyong, Hu Xinyuan. Effects of Basal Zinc Fertilizer on Activities of Disease Resistance-Related Enzymes, Soil Borne Diseases and Yield of Potato under Long-Term Continuous Cropping [J]. Crops, 2022, 38(4): 154-159.
[8] Chen Yuzhen, Tang Guangbin, Ma Xianxin, Tian Guiyun, Yu Hongxin, Luo Yingluo, Fan Mingshou, Jia Liguo. Four Major Regulatory Pathways of Potato Tuber Development [J]. Crops, 2022, 38(4): 9-13.
[9] Zhang Xiaoquan, Jia Zhenyu, Li Juxu, Li Hongchen, Wang Baoxiang, Wang Jian, Shi Gang, Wang Chuan, Wu Yunjie. Effects of Different Root-Promoting Practices on Potassium Metabolism at Mature Stage of Flue-Cured Tobacco in Southern Anhui [J]. Crops, 2022, 38(3): 205-210.
[10] Liu Ju, Li Guangcun, Duan Shaoguang, Hu Jun, Jian Yinqiao, Liu Jiangang, Jin Liping, Xu Jianfei. The Effects of Different Night Temperature Treatments on in vitro Tuberization and Related-Genes Expression in Potato [J]. Crops, 2022, 38(3): 92-98.
[11] Zhao Kai, Jin Xiujuan, Sun Lili, Yan Rongyue, Lu Juan, Guo Feng, Md Ashraful Islam, Shi Yugang, Sun Daizhen. The Role of Wheat Deplantation-Related Genes in Degradation of Chlorophyll in Spring Wheat Leaves [J]. Crops, 2022, 38(2): 81-88.
[12] Yang Zhinan, Huang Jinwen, Han Fanxiang, Li Yawei, Ma Jiantao, Chai Shouxi, Cheng Hongbo, Yang Delong, Chang Lei. Effects of Straw Strip Mulching on Soil Temperature and Yield of Potato Field in Rain-Fed Region in Northwest China [J]. Crops, 2022, 38(1): 196-204.
[13] Li Runqing, Shen Yong, Zhu Kuanyu, Wang Zhiqin, Yang Jianchang. Effects of Nitrogen Application Rates on the Grain Yield, Starch RVA Profile Characteristics and Physicochemical Properties of Super Rice Nanjing 9108 [J]. Crops, 2022, 38(1): 205-212.
[14] Liu Yajun, Wang Wenjing, Wang Honggang, Wang Qi, Hu Qiguo, Chu Fengli. Effects of Crop Rotation on Soil Microbial Community in Sweet Potato Field [J]. Crops, 2021, 37(6): 122-128.
[15] Gao Jia, Wang Jiao, Wang Song, Liu Hongjian, Kang Jia, Shen Hong, Wang Haili, Ren Shaoyong. Effects of Biochar-Based Fertilizer on Soil Urease Activity and Yield of Potato [J]. Crops, 2021, 37(6): 134-138.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!