Crops ›› 2023, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (2): 171-177.doi: 10.16035/j.issn.1001-7283.2023.02.025

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Effects of Different Harvest Maturity of Upper Six Leaves on Physiological Metabolism and Quality of Flue-Cured Tobacco Line LY1306

Wang Yuehua1(), Zhou Junxue2(), Ma Yilin1, Ma Junhong2, Wang Yanfang1, Zhao Shimin2, Shen Hongtao3, Li Youjun1, Liu Ling1()   

  1. 1College of Agriculture, Henan University of Science and Technology, Luoyang 471023, Henan, China
    2Technology Center, Luoyang Branch of Henan Provincial Tobacco Corporation, Luoyang 471000, Henan, China
    3Technology Center, China Tobacco Henan Industrial Limited Company, Zhengzhou 450016, Henan, China
  • Received:2022-03-11 Revised:2022-06-20 Online:2023-04-15 Published:2023-04-11

RichHTML

6

PDF (PC)

132

Abstract:

In order to determine the suitable one-time harvest maturity of upper six leaves of flue-cured tobacco line LY1306 in Luoyang tobacco region, four harvest maturity treatments (M1, M2, M3 and M4) were set up in field, and the effects of different harvest maturity on the chlorophyll content (SPAD value), leaf color relative value, malondialdehyde (MDA) content, antioxidant enzyme activities, and key enzyme activities of carbon and nitrogen metabolism at three leaf positions (upper1~2 leaves, upper3~4 leaves and upper5~6 leaves) of upper six leaves were investigated, and the differences of the conventional chemical composition and sensory quality in cured tobacco leaves were further analyzed. The results showed that, the activities of superoxide dismutase and amylase increased first and then decreased with the increase of harvest maturity, and reached the maximum at M3 treatment stage. The activities of peroxidase, catalase and nitrate reductase decreased gradually, the content of MDA increased gradually, and the change range of M3 to M4 treatment stages were further increased compared with other treatment stages. SPAD value and leaf color relative value decreased with the increase of harvest maturity, there was no significant difference in SPAD values among three leaf positions, and the leaf color relative value also tended to be stable at M3 and M4 treatment stages. The total sugar, reducing sugar content and sugar-alkali ratio of flue-cured tobacco leaves were all the highest, the burned-sugar aroma was prominent and the total score of sensory evaluation was the highest in M3 treatment. Taken together, the upper six leaves of line LY1306 was suitable for one-time harvest at M3 treatment stage (when upper3~4 leaves were 70%~80% yellow, the main veins became all white and the branch veins became 2/3 white, the leaf surface turned wrinkled, the SPAD value was about 18, as well as the leaf color relative value was about 1.07) in Luoyang tobacco region.

Key words: Flue-cured tobacco, Line LY1306, Upper six leaves, Harvest maturity, Physiological metabolism, Quality

Table 1

Test design"

处理
Treatment		 上3~4叶外观成熟特征
Appearance mature characteristics of upper 3~4 leaves		 采收日期
Harvest date		 移栽后天数
Days after transplanting (d)		 叶龄
Leaf age (d)
M1 叶面落黄5~6成，主脉1/2变白、支脉1/3变白 9月15日 134 80
M2 叶面落黄6~7成，主脉2/3变白、支脉1/2变白 9月20日 139 85
M3 叶面落黄7~8成，主脉全白、支脉2/3变白，叶面皱褶 9月25日 144 90
M4 叶面落黄8成以上，主脉、支脉近全白 9月30日 149 95

Fig.1

Effects of different harvest maturity on the SPAD values of upper six leaves of flue-cured tobacco Different lowercase letters indicate significant difference at the P < 0.05 level, the same below"

Fig.2

Effects of different harvest maturity on the leaf color relative values of upper six leaves of flue-cured tobacco"

Fig.3

Effects of different harvest maturity on the MDA contents of upper six leaves of flue-cured tobacco"

Fig.4

Effects of different harvest maturity on the SOD, POD and CAT activities of upper six leaves of flue-cured tobacco"

Fig.5

Effects of different harvest maturity on the NR and AM activities of upper six leaves of flue-cured tobacco"

Table 2

Effects of different harvest maturity on the conventional chemical composition of upper six leaves of flue-cured tobacco"

叶位
Leaf position		 处理
Treatment		 总糖
Total sugar
(%)		 还原糖
Reducing sugar
(%)		 总氮
Total N
(%)		 烟碱
Nicotine
(%)		 钾
K (%)		 氯
Cl (%)		 糖碱比
Sugar/
alkaloid		 钾氯比
K/Cl
上1~2片叶
Upper 1~2 leaves		 M1 18.51±0.12c 14.29±0.01c 2.87±0.02a 2.78±0.01d 1.30±0.05a 0.42±0.05b 6.66±0.01c 3.09±0.48a
M2 21.12±0.19b 15.10±0.07b 2.66±0.02b 2.92±0.01c 1.21±0.04ab 0.69±0.01a 7.24±0.09b 1.75±0.02d
M3 23.85±0.02a 15.80±0.16a 2.45±0.03c 3.04±0.02b 1.20±0.01ab 0.44±0.03b 7.84±0.04a 2.73±0.16b
M4 18.08±0.58c 14.21±0.02c 2.17±0.02d 3.20±0.02a 1.14±0.01b 0.50±0.06ab 5.65±0.14d 2.28±0.29c
上3~4片叶
Upper 3~4 leaves		 M1 18.71±0.10c 15.61±0.18c 2.66±0.09a 2.75±0.02c 1.31±0.03a 0.43±0.03a 6.80±0.23bc 3.05±0.43b
M2 20.13±0.42b 16.61±0.05b 2.48±0.05b 2.82±0.03b 1.27±0.06ab 0.40±0.06a 7.13±0.21b 3.18±0.54a
M3 23.15±0.45a 18.66±0.08a 2.21±0.10c 2.89±0.04b 1.24±0.04ab 0.42±0.03a 8.01±0.20a 2.95±0.36c
M4 20.18±0.85b 16.90±0.01b 1.99±0.06d 3.05±0.05a 1.19±0.02b 0.38±0.05a 6.61±0.19c 3.13±0.26a
上5~6片叶
Upper 5~6 leaves		 M1 20.76±0.09c 16.71±0.10c 2.66±0.03a 2.59±0.01c 1.48±0.01a 0.33±0.04b 8.02±0.07b 4.48±0.60a
M2 22.13±0.19b 17.36±0.03b 2.44±0.02b 2.68±0.01c 1.25±0.03b 0.52±0.02a 8.25±0.03b 2.40±0.14b
M3 24.74±0.22a 18.01±0.11a 2.32±0.01c 2.90±0.05b 1.09±0.01c 0.38±0.01b 8.53±0.08a 2.88±0.03b
M4 22.59±0.21b 17.51±0.11b 1.93±0.07d 3.10±0.04a 1.03±0.03c 0.36±0.04b 7.28±0.02c 2.86±0.40b

Table 3

Effects of different harvest maturity on the sensory quality of upper six leaves of flue-cured tobacco"

处理
Treatment		 风格特征评价Evaluation of style characteristics 品质特征评价Evaluation of quality characteristics 总分
(9)
焦甜香
(5)		 干草香
(5)		 烘焙香
(5)		 焦香
(5)		 青香
(5)		 浓度
(5)		 劲头 香气质
(9)		 香气量
(9)		 杂气
(9)		 柔细度
(9)		 刺激性
(9)		 余味
(9)
M1 2.50 3.00 2.00 2.50 1.00 3.50 中 6.20 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00 6.00
M2 2.50 3.00 2.50 3.00 0.50 3.60 中 6.30 6.30 6.10 6.00 6.00 5.90 6.20
M3 3.00 3.00 2.50 3.00 0.50 3.50 中 6.50 6.40 6.00 6.40 6.10 6.00 6.30
M4 2.00 3.00 2.00 3.50 0.50 3.50 中+ 6.00 5.90 6.00 6.30 6.00 5.90 6.00
[1] 马彩娟, 吴彦辉, 常建伟, 等. 上部烟叶片结构对烟叶品质和可用性的影响. 中国烟草科学, 2019, 40(4):48-55.
[2] 刘扣珠, 高真真, 李建华, 等. 豫中烤烟上六片烟叶叶长与主要化学成分及感官质量关系. 中国烟草科学, 2019, 40(6):75-82,88.
[3] 唐丽, 罗丽琼. 上部烟叶存在的问题及可用性分析. 现代农业科技, 2016(2):79-81.
[4] 周康, 李青山, 张富军, 等. 采收成熟度对烤烟上部叶不同分切区段质量的影响. 中国烟草科学, 2021, 42(2):62-70.
[5] 范宁波, 周俊学, 江凯, 等. 不同成熟期烤烟主脉中膜脂过氧化及其与衰老相关基因的关系探究. 中国农业科技导报, 2021, 23(3):66-72.
doi: 10.13304/j.nykjdb.2019.0835
[6] 刘化冰, 尚晓颍, 刘建国, 等. 成熟度、品种及其互作对烤烟多酚类物质的影响. 中国烟草科学, 2019, 40(4):29-36.
[7] 张冰濯, 段卫东, 张明刚, 等. 湘南烟区烤烟上部6片叶采收期对烟叶产质量的影响. 烟草科技, 2020, 53(12):16-26.
[8] 周俊学, 李宏伟, 杨新卿. 洛阳烟区气候适应性评价. 江西农业学报, 2010, 22(4):88-89,92.
[9] 赵莉, 杨惠娟, 赵世民, 等. 烤烟新品系LY1306烟叶质量评价与分析. 江西农业学报, 2017, 29(1):57-61,68.
[10] 高俊凤. 植物生理学实验指导. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2006.
[11] 邹琦. 植物生理生化实验指导. 北京: 中国农业出版社,1995.
[12] 王彦亭, 谢剑平, 李志宏. 中国烟草种植区划. 北京: 科学出版社, 2010.
[13] 陈爱国, 王树声, 梁晓芳, 等. 烤烟叶片成熟与衰老生理特性研究. 中国烟草科学, 2005(4):8-10.
[14] 刘领, 李冬, 马宜林, 等. 外源褪黑素对干旱胁迫下烤烟幼苗生长的缓解效应与生理机制研究. 草业学报, 2019, 28(8):95-105.
[15] 李金奥, 张思唯, 刘博远, 等. 种植密度对雪茄烟膜脂过氧化特性及烟叶质量的影响. 作物杂志, 2021(3):178-184.
[16] 王峰吉, 陈朝阳, 江豪. 烤烟品种云烟85烟叶的成熟度Ⅱ.成熟度与保护酶活性及膜脂过氧化作用的关系. 福建农业大学学报, 2003, 32(2):162-166.
[17] 王红丽, 杨惠娟, 苏菲, 等. 氮用量对烤烟成熟期叶片碳氮代谢及萜类代谢相关基因表达的影响. 中国烟草学报, 2014, 20(5):116-120.
[18] 刘博远, 赵松超, 李一凡, 等. 不同成熟度雪茄烟晾制过程碳水化合物及相关酶活性变化规律研究. 中国农业科技导报, 2021, 23(4):192-201.
doi: 10.13304/j.nykjdb.2019.0411
[19] 廖孔凤, 徐兴阳, 代瑾然, 等. 2个生态区不同成熟度烟叶生理生化指标的研究. 西南农业学报, 2016, 29(2):281-287.
[20] 雷佳, 吕永华, 李淮源, 等. 烤烟碳氮代谢调节机理及其指标研究进展. 广东农业科学, 2018, 45(12):20-26.
[21] 陈永明, 王行, 赵伟才, 等. 不同烤烟品种成熟期碳氮代谢关键酶活性的变化. 江西农业学报, 2014, 26(8):43-45.
[22] 王寒, 林锐锋, 彭琛, 等. 采收时间对烤烟碳氮代谢关键酶活性和烟叶化学成分的影响. 烟草科技, 2013(8):79-84,90.
[23] 薛琳, 朱启法, 季学军, 等. 皖南烤烟烟叶化学成分与感官品质的相关性. 烟草科技, 2016, 49(11):26-32.
[24] 吴有祥, 胡世龙, 欧明毅, 等. 采收时期对烤烟成熟度和感官质量的影响. 广东农业科学, 2017, 44(7):13-18.
[25] 孙阳阳, 靳志伟, 黄明迪, 等. SPAD值与鲜烟叶成熟度及烤后烟叶质量的关系. 中国烟草科学, 2016, 37(2):42-46.
[26] 孙光伟, 陈振国, 王玉军, 等. 烤烟上部叶采收时SPAD值与鲜烟组织结构、生理指标及烤后烟叶内在质量的关系. 中国烟草学报, 2019, 25(5):63-69,104.
[27] 剧成欣, 张耗, 王志琴, 等. 水稻高产和氮肥高效利用研究进展. 中国稻米, 2013, 19(1):16-21.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-8082.2013.01.005
[1] Shan Jiaye, Zhang Xuewei, Yan Min, Yang Jian, Wang Fei, He Jixian, Hu Gang, Wang Yuchen, Jing Yanqiu, Lei Qiang. Effects of Spraying Rare Earth Micro-Fertilizer on Growth and Physiological Characteristics of Flue-Cured Tobacco under Drought Stress [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(2): 100-105.
[2] Wang Rongsheng, Mu Fengchen, Li Kun, Zhang Wei, Liu Hui, Ding Guohua, Yang Guang, Wang Nanbo, Zhang Guomin, Liu Yuming, Tao Yongqing. Comprehensive Analysis of Milling Quality and Eating Quality of Japonica Rice in Cold Region [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(2): 115-120.
[3] Yang Shiqi, Chen Liming, Zhou Yanzhi, Tan Xueming, Zeng Yongjun, Shi Qinghua, Pan Xiaohua, Zeng Yanhua. Effects of Weeds Control on the Yield and Quality of Double- Cropping Direct-Seeded High-Quality Late Indica Rice [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(2): 121-125.
[4] Han Yuhuan, Liu Chen, Yang Long, Yu Tao. Effects of Topping Period and Number of Remained Leaves on Growth and Development of Upper Leaves of Flue-Cured Tobacco in Shandong Province [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(2): 157-162.
[5] Zhang Yifei, Zu Qingxue, Nie Zhongyang, Lin Song, Rao Chen, Cheng Zhijun. Research on Contribution of Glutamic Acid to Nitrogen Nutrition and Physiological Characteristics of Flue-Cured Tobacco [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(2): 186-192.
[6] Rong Shibin, Qin Yanqing, Zhao Yuanyuan, Li Jingjing, Wang Jun, Zhou Jun, Liu Deshui, Zhang Ruina, Zeng Yang, Tan Shu, Yan Jie, Shi Hongzhi. Effects of Different Curing Methods on Chemical Components and Aroma Quality of Sichuan Cigar Wrapper and Local Filler [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(2): 207-213.
[7] Xu Dong, He Jianqing, Zhang Gejie, Liu Haixin, Ma Jinyu, Wang Siyuan. Effects of Fertilizer Combined with Garden Waste Compost on Yield, Quality of Highland Barley and Soil Fertility [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(2): 214-221.
[8] Meng Yaxuan, Yao Xuhang, Zhou Baoyuan, Liu Yinghui, Yuan Jincheng, Ma Wei, Zhao Ming. Research Progress on Mixed Silage of Zea mays [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(2): 24-29.
[9] Yuan Shuai, Su Yuting, Chen Pingping, Yi Zhenxie. Effects of Nitrogen Management on Yield Formation and Rice Quality of Double Cropping Hybrid Rice in Southern Hunan [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(2): 91-99.
[10] Wang Dequan, Liu Yang, Liu Jiang, Chen Keling, Wang Yi, Du Chuanyin, Du Yuhai, Ma Xinghua. Research Progress of Furrow and Ridge Rain-Harvesting Farming Technology and its Application Prospects in Flue-Cured Tobacco Production [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(1): 1-5.
[11] Xia Yuying, Wang Zhijun, Li Hongyu, Hu Chuanjun, Lü Yandong, Zhao Haicheng, Zheng Guiping. Effects of Seedling Raising Methods on Seedling Quality, Yield and Quality of Rice in Cold Region [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(1): 103-108.
[12] Wang Yujiao, Chang Xuhong, Wang Demei, Wang Yanjie, Yang Yushuang, Shi Shubing, Zhao Guangcai. Effects of Sowing Methods on Yield and Quality of Different Varieties of Wheat [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(1): 122-128.
[13] Chen Dong, Zou Jing, Guo Ganggang, Dai Wendian, Song Shaoguang, Huang Ying. Effects of Different Specifications of Seedling Trays on Quality and Main Physiological Characteristics of Tobacco Seedlings [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(1): 129-135.
[14] Yu Yongtao, Zhang Nan, Xie Lihua, Li Guangyu, Liu Jianhua, Li Wu, Li Gaoke, Hu Jianguang. A Preliminary Study on Preference of Consumers in Eating Quality Evaluation of Sweet Corn Germplasms [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(1): 14-19.
[15] Zhai Caijiao, Zhang Jiao, Cui Shiyou, Chen Pengjun, Han Jijun. Effects of Slow/Controlled Release Fertilizer Application on Growth, Yield and Quality of Rice under Salt Stress [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(1): 143-151.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!