检索
E-mail
RSS
高级检索 图表检索

当期目录 我要投稿 过刊浏览
高级检索 图表检索

作物杂志,2023, 第5期: 1–9 doi: 10.16035/j.issn.1001-7283.2023.05.001

• 遗传育种·种质资源·生物技术 •    下一篇

利用海岛棉染色体片段导入系定位纤维品质性状QTL

李兴河(), 王海涛, 刘存敬, 唐丽媛, 张素君, 蔡肖, 张香云, 张建宏()   

  1. 河北省农林科学院棉花研究所/农业农村部黄淮海半干旱区棉花生物学与遗传育种重点实验室/国家棉花改良中心河北分中心，050051，河北石家庄
  • 收稿日期:2022-04-18 修回日期:2023-04-11 出版日期:2023-10-15 发布日期:2023-10-16
  • 通讯作者: 张建宏，主要从事棉花分子育种研究，E-mail：nkyzjh@qq.com
  • 作者简介:李兴河，主要从事棉花分子育种研究，E-mail：xingheli111@126.com
  • 基金资助:
    河北省农林科学院基本科研业务费项目(2023070106);河北省农林科学院科技创新专项(2022KJCXZX-MHS-1)

QTL Mapping for Fiber Quality Traits Using Gossypium barbadense Chromosome Segment Introgression Lines

Li Xinghe(), Wang Haitao, Liu Cunjing, Tang Liyuan, Zhang Sujun, Cai Xiao, Zhang Xiangyun, Zhang Jianhong()   

  1. Institute of Cotton, Hebei Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences/Key Laboratory of Biology and Genetic Improvement of Cotton in Huanghuaihai Semiarid Area, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs/Hebei Branch of National Cotton Improvement Center, Shijiazhuang 050051, Hebei, China
  • Received:2022-04-18 Revised:2023-04-11 Online:2023-10-15 Published:2023-10-16

RichHTML

24

PDF (PC)

206

摘要：

优质棉育种是当前棉花育种的工作重点，海岛棉染色体片段导入系是定位纤维品质性状QTL、定向改良棉花纤维品质的重要材料。以构建的一套以陆地棉冀棉262为背景的海岛棉海7124染色体片段导入系为材料，对上半部平均长度、断裂比强度、马克隆值、整齐度指数和伸长率5个纤维品质性状进行相关性分析及QTL定位。结果表明，上半部平均长度与断裂比强度、整齐度指数，断裂比强度与整齐度指数均呈极显著正相关，断裂比强度与伸长率呈极显著负相关，可能存在QTL的重叠或连锁。利用459对全部锚定在26条染色体上的SSR标记进行QTL定位分析，鉴定得到155个与纤维品质性状相关的QTL，解释表型变异率在6.57%~38.72%，分别位于At亚组的13条染色体和Dt亚组的7条染色体上，每条染色体上平均检测得到7.75个QTL，其中D5染色体上QTL最多，达30个，与上半部平均长度、马克隆值、伸长率相关的各7个，与整齐度指数相关的6个，与断裂比强度相关的3个;在A9染色体上仅检测到1个与伸长率相关的QTL。本研究鉴定得到的QTL位点与已报道的纤维品质位点部分重合或一致，与之相连锁的分子标记将在优质棉品种选育工作中发挥积极作用。

关键词: 染色体片段, 导入系, QTL定位, 纤维品质, 优质棉

Abstract:

Breeding of superior fiber quality cotton is the focus of current cotton breeding. Gossypium barbadense chromosome segment introgression lines (CSILs) are important materials for QTL mapping of fiber quality traits and directional improvement of fiber quality in cotton. In present study, a Hai 7124 introgression lines with Jimian 262 as background were developed, and the correlation analysis and QTLs mapping of five fiber quality traits were performed by CSIL population. The results showed that the significantly positive correlations among the average fiber length of the upper half (FL), the fiber strength (FS) and uniformity index (FU) were observed, and extremely positive correlation between FS and FU. While, a significant negative correlation between FS and FE was detected. It indicated that QTL overlap or linkage between fiber traits might exist. A total of 459 pairs of SSR markers anchored on all 26 chromosomes were used for QTL mapping analysis. Totally, 155 QTLs for five fiber quality traits were identified with explained the phenotypic variation rate of each QTL ranged from 6.57% to 38.72%. These QTLs were located on 13 chromosomes of the At subgroup and seven chromosomes of the Dt subgroup. An average of 7.75 QTLs were detected on each chromosome, among which there were 30 QTLs on Chr.D5, seven QTLs related to FL, MIC and FE, six QTLs related to FU, and three QTLs related to FS. Only one QTL related to FE was detected on Chr.A9. The QTLs identified in this study were partially overlapped or consistent with the reported fiber quality loci, and the linked molecular markers will play an active role in the breeding of high quality cotton varieties.

Key words: Chromosome segment, Introgression lines, QTL mapping, Fiber quality, High-quality cotton

表1

亲本和BC4F2:3的纤维品质性状（小安舍，2018年）

性状
Trait		 冀棉262
Jimian 262		 海7124
Hai 7124		 染色体片段导入系Chromosome segment introgression lines
平均值±标准差Mean±SD 幅度Range 偏度Skewness 峰度Kurtosis
上半部平均长度Fiber length (mm) 28.87 33.70 29.48±1.40 24.96~34.44 0.14 -0.07
断裂比强度Fiber strength (cN/tex) 27.30 38.90 27.54±2.41 21.10~35.35 0.33 -0.59
马克隆值MIC 5.12 4.03 4.88±0.49 3.42~6.49 0.03 -0.71
整齐度指数Fiber uniformity (%) 84.80 87.10 84.59±1.29 80.70~89.80 0.01 -0.41
伸长率Fiber elongation (%) 8.30 11.60 8.64±0.73 6.80~12.70 0.19 -0.56

图1

纤维品质性状的频率分布图 M：平均值，SD：标准偏差

表2

BC4F2:3群体的纤维品质性状的Pearson相关系数

性状
Trait		 上半部
平均长度
Fiber
length		 断裂比
强度
Fiber
strength		 马克
隆值
MIC		 整齐度
指数
Fiber
uniformity
断裂比强度Fiber strength 0.622**
马克隆值MIC -0.141 0.100
整齐度指数Fiber uniformity 0.652** 0.630** 0.277*
伸长率Fiber elongation -0.254* -0.298** -0.184 -0.266*

表3

QTL簇分布

序号
Code		 标记区间
Adjacent marker		 关联性状
Related trait		 位置区间
Approximate
position (cM)		 QTL数量
Number
of QTL		 QTL 位置
Position
(cM)		 解释表型变异率
Explain the phenotypic
variation rate (%)		 加性效应
Additive
effect
A1-cluster-1 NAU2437-HAU3193 FL+FU+MIC+FE 13.3~22.8 4 qFE-A1-1 17.31 24.18 4.71
qFL-A1-1 17.31 26.76 15.31
qFU-A1-1 17.31 27.48 43.07
qMIC-A1-1 17.31 25.13 2.89
A1-cluster-2 HAU3193-NAU3533 FL+FU+MIC+FE 22.8~63.9 4 qFU-A1-2 37.81 27.48 43.07
qFL-A1-2 38.81 26.76 15.31
qFE-A1-2 41.81 24.18 4.71
qMIC-A1-2 41.81 25.13 2.89
A2-cluster-1 NAU5499-CGR5688 FL 19.0~44.7 1 qFL-A2-1 26.01 26.76 15.31
A2-cluster-2 BNL2651-HAU0306 FL+FU+FS 54.2~67.0 3 qFL-A2-2 57.21 26.76 15.31
qFU-A2-1 57.21 27.48 43.07
qFS-A2-1 57.21 25.20 14.33
A3-cluster NAU3016-NAU3083 FU+FS+MIC+FE 105.9~142.7 4 qFU-A3-1 128.91 27.48 43.07
qFS-A3-1 128.91 25.20 14.33
qMIC-A3-1 128.91 25.13 2.89
qFE-A3-1 128.91 24.18 4.71
A4-cluster NAU1151-NAU2235 FU+FS 0.0~14.1 2 qFU-A4-1 4.01 30.00 42.95
qFS-A4-1 4.01 29.86 14.31
A5-cluster-1 NAU3382-NAU1127 FL 48.1~62.2 1 qFL-A5-1 50.71 26.76 15.31
A5-cluster-2 BNL3992-NAU3014 FL+FS+FE 108.2~116.6 3 qFL-A5-2 111.81 6.57 3.86
qFS-A5-1 111.81 6.66 3.74
qFE-A5-1 111.81 6.66 1.24
A5-cluster-3 CIR062-HAU1034 FL+FU+FS 120.2~133.0 3 qFL-A5-3 126.81 30.17 15.34
qFU-A5-1 126.81 30.68 43.03
qFS-A5-2 126.81 29.57 14.49
A6-cluster BNL2569-CIR203 FL+FU+FS+MIC+FE 110.0~118.2 8 qFL-A6-1 111.01 31.09 15.34
qFL-A6-2 116.51 7.30 3.54
qFU-A6-1 111.01 31.49 43.00
qFS-A6-1 111.01 30.19 14.41
qFS-A6-2 117.51 11.19 5.00
qMIC-A3-1 111.01 29.63 2.90
qFE-A6-1 111.01 28.79 4.76
qFE-A6-2 117.51 8.67 1.36
A7-cluster NAU2564-NAU4082 FL+FU+FS+MIC+FE 7.7~32.2 5 qFL-A7-1 27.71 37.87 15.32
qFU-A7-1 27.71 38.72 43.00
qFS-A7-1 27.71 37.28 14.43
qMIC-A7-1 27.71 35.96 2.89
qFE-A7-1 27.71 35.27 4.76
A8-cluster-1 CGR5759-CIR343 FL+FU+MIC+FE 36.2~44.6 4 qFL-A8-1 38.71 26.76 15.31
qFU-A8-1 38.71 27.48 43.07
qMIC-A8-1 38.71 25.13 2.89
qFE-A8-1 38.71 24.18 4.71
A8-cluster-2 BNL3474-CGR5363 FL+FU+MIC+FE 52.2~70.4 7 qFU-A8-2 58.91 27.48 43.07
qFE-A8-2 58.91 24.18 4.71
qFL-A8-2 64.31 26.76 -15.31
qFU-A8-3 64.31 27.48 -43.07
qFS-A8-1 64.31 25.20 -14.33
qMIC-A8-2 64.31 25.13 -2.89
qFE-A8-3 65.91 24.18 -4.71
A9-cluster HAU3241-HAU3365 FE 85.9~93.9 1 qFE-A9-1 86.91 27.53 4.77
A10-cluster NAU3574-STV031 FL+FU+FS+MIC+FE 72.5~113.7 10 qFL-A10-1 74.51 26.76 15.31
qFU-A10-1 74.51 27.48 43.07
qFS-A10-1 74.51 25.20 14.33
qMIC-A10-1 74.51 25.13 2.89
qFE-A10-1 74.51 24.18 4.71
qFL-A10-2 87.91 26.76 15.31
qFU-A10-2 87.91 27.48 43.07
qFS-A10-2 87.91 25.20 14.33
qMIC-A10-2 87.91 25.13 2.89
qFE-A10-2 87.91 24.18 4.71
A11-cluster-1 JESPR201-DPL0103 FL+FU+FS+MIC 81.5~86.7 4 qFL-A11-1 83.51 26.76 15.31
qFU-A11-1 83.51 27.48 43.07
qFS-A11-1 83.51 25.20 14.33
qMIC-A11-1 83.51 25.13 2.89
A11-cluster-2 BNL1408-JESPR296 FL+FU+MIC 92.3~100.9 3 qMIC-A11-2 96.31 25.13 2.89
qFL-A11-2 98.41 26.76 15.31
qFU-A11-2 98.41 27.48 43.07
A11-cluster-3 NAU2599-NAU5505 FL+FU+FS+MIC 105.4~116.0 4 qFL-A11-3 113.41 26.76 15.31
qFU-A11-3 113.41 27.48 43.07
qFS-A11-2 113.41 25.20 14.33
qMIC-A11-3 113.41 25.13 2.89
A12-cluster-1 DPL0057-NAU3561 MIC 4.9~18.5 1 qMIC-A12-1 10.91 25.13 2.89
A12-cluster-2 NAU1151-NAU5492 FU+FS+FE 98.9~104.4 3 qFU-A12-1 100.91 27.48 43.07
qFS-A12-1 100.91 25.20 14.33
qFE-A12-1 100.91 24.18 4.71
A12-cluster-3 NAU3713-NAU5204 FU+FS+MIC+FE 109.6~114.8 4 qFU-A12-2 110.61 27.48 43.07
qFS-A12-2 110.61 25.20 14.33
qMIC-A12-2 110.61 25.13 2.89
qFE-A12-2 110.61 24.18 4.71
A13-cluster BNL4029-NAU4104 FL+FU+FS+MIC+FE 59.9~70.9 10 qFL-A13-1 61.91 26.76 15.31
qFL-A13-2 69.21 26.76 15.31
qFU-A13-1 61.91 27.48 43.07
qFU-A13-2 69.21 27.48 43.07
qFS-A13-1 61.91 25.20 14.33
qFS-A13-2 69.21 25.20 14.33
qMIC-A13-1 61.91 25.13 2.89
qMIC-A13-2 69.21 25.13 2.89
qFE-A13-1 61.91 24.18 4.71
qFE-A13-2 69.21 24.18 4.71
D2-cluster CIR288-CGR5030 FU+FS+FE 45.3~49.2 3 qFU-D2-1 48.61 27.48 43.07
qFS-D2-1 48.61 25.20 14.33
qFE-D2-1 48.61 24.18 4.71
D4-cluster NAU2329-BNL4049 FL+FU+FS 74.6~81.4 3 qFL-D4-1 77.31 26.76 15.31
qFU-D4-1 77.31 27.48 43.07
qFS-D4-1 77.31 25.20 14.33
D5-cluster-1 NAU3095-NAU3649 FL+FU+FS+MIC+FE 10.8~19.5 5 qFL-D5-1 15.71 26.76 15.31
qFU-D5-1 15.71 27.48 43.07
qFS-D5-1 15.71 25.20 14.33
qMIC-D5-1 15.71 25.13 2.89
qFE-D5-1 15.71 24.18 4.71
D5-cluster-2 DPL0893-NAU2636 FL+FU+FS+MIC+FE 37.2~58.0 6 qMIC-D5-2 41.31 28.81 2.92
qFL-D5-2 54.21 26.76 15.31
qFU-D5-2 54.21 29.82 43.04
qFS-D5-2 54.21 25.20 14.33
qMIC-D5-3 54.21 28.81 2.92
qFE-D5-2 54.21 28.11 4.79
D5-cluster-3 NAU3652-HAU3498 FL+FU+FS+MIC+FE 62.0~67.5 5 qFL-D5-3 63.71 26.76 15.31
qFU-D5-3 63.71 29.82 43.04
qFS-D5-3 63.71 25.20 14.33
qMIC-D5-4 63.71 28.81 2.92
qFE-D5-3 63.71 28.11 4.79
D5-cluster-4 BNL390-NAU2741 FL+FU+MIC+FE 83.8~94.6 8 qFL-D5-4 87.81 26.76 15.31
qFU-D5-4 87.81 27.48 43.07
qMIC-D5-5 87.81 25.13 2.89
qFE-D5-4 87.81 24.18 4.71
qFL-D5-5 94.01 26.76 15.31
qFU-D5-5 94.01 27.48 43.07
qMIC-D5-6 94.01 25.13 2.89
qFE-D5-5 94.01 24.18 4.71
D5-cluster-5 NAU5005-BNL3811 FL+FU+MIC+FE 99.8~110.1 4 qFL-D5-6 108.81 26.76 15.31
qFU-D5-6 108.81 27.48 43.07
qMIC-D5-7 108.81 25.13 2.89
qFE-D5-6 108.81 24.18 4.71
D5-cluster-6 BNL285-CGR5803 FE 131.4~157.7 1 qFE-D5-7 133.61 24.18 24.18
D5-cluster-7 NAU4884-NAU2233 FL 162.2~169.4 1 qFL-D5-7 166.01 26.76 15.31
D6-cluster-1 Gh513 FL+FS+MIC 0.0~2.4 3 qFL-D6-1 0.01 26.76 15.31
qFS-D6-1 0.01 25.20 14.33
qMIC-D6-1 0.01 25.13 2.89
D6-cluster-2 BNL3594-DPL0282 FS 10.1~35.1 1 qFS-D6-2 14.71 25.20 14.33
D6-cluster-3 BNL2569-HAU2022 FU 105.5~111.1 1 qFU-D6-1 109.71 27.48 43.07
D9-cluster NAU6323-NAU6764 FL+FU+FS+MIC+FE 47.4~93.1 9 qFL-D9-1 58.41 26.76 15.31
qFL-D9-2 86.01 26.76 15.31
qFU-D9-1 58.41 27.48 43.07
qFU-D9-2 87.01 27.48 43.07
qFS-D9-1 58.41 25.20 14.33
qFS-D9-2 86.01 25.20 14.33
qMIC-D9-1 58.41 25.13 2.89
qMIC-D9-2 86.01 25.13 2.89
qFE-D9-1 58.41 24.18 4.71
D11-cluster-1 NAU3748-BNL3171 FL 0.0~42.4 1 qFL-D11-1 37.01 26.76 26.76
D11-cluster-2 NAU6431-HAU2559 FL+FU+FS+MIC+FE 150.7~188.1 5 qFL-D11-2 166.71 26.76 15.31
qFU-D11-1 166.71 27.48 43.07
qFS-D11-1 166.71 25.20 14.33
qMIC-D11-1 166.71 25.13 2.89
qFE-D11-1 166.71 24.18 4.71
D12-cluster NAU2902-NAU3881 FL+FU+FS+MIC+FE 20.0~56.9 10 qFL-D12-1 29.21 26.76 15.31
qFL-D12-2 39.91 26.76 15.31
qFU-D12-1 29.21 27.48 43.07
qFU-D12-2 39.91 27.48 43.07
qFS-D12-1 29.21 25.20 14.33
qFS-D12-2 39.91 25.20 14.33
qMIC-D12-1 29.21 25.13 2.89
qMIC-D12-2 39.91 25.13 2.89
qFE-D12-1 29.21 24.18 4.71
qFE-D12-2 39.91 24.18 4.71
[1] Fang L, Wang Q, Hu Y, et al. Genomic analyses in cotton identify signatures of selection and loci associated with fiber quality and yield traits. Nature Genetics, 2017, 49(7):1089-1098.
doi: 10.1038/ng.3887 pmid: 28581501
[2] 杨君, 马峙英, 王省芬. 棉花纤维品质改良相关基因研究进展. 中国农业科学, 2016, 49(22):4310-4322.
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2016.22.005
[3] 张素君, 李兴河, 唐丽媛, 等. 陆地棉纤维品质性状关联分析及优异等位基因挖掘. 植物遗传资源学报, 2021, 22(1):214-228.
[4] Wang P P, He S, Sun G F, et al. Favorable pleiotropic loci for fiber yield and quality in upland cotton (Gossypium hirsutum). Scientific Reports, 2021, 11(1):15935.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-95629-9
[5] 郭宝生, 刘素恩, 赵存鹏, 等. 转FBP7::iaaM基因陆地棉种质冀资139纤维品质性状杂种优势分析. 植物学报, 2021, 56(2):166-174.
[6] Shen X L, Guo W Z, Zhu X F, et al. Molecular mapping of QTLs for fiber qualities in three diverse lines in Upland cotton using SSR markers. Molecular Breeding, 2005, 15(2):169-181.
doi: 10.1007/s11032-004-4731-0
[7] 张先亮, 王坤波, 宋国立, 等. 陆地棉重组近交系中“G6”QTL的初步定位. 棉花学报, 2008, 20(3):192-197.
[8] Li H G, Pan Z E, He S P, et al. QTL mapping of agronomic and economic traits for four F2 populations of upland cotton. Journal of Cotton Research, 2021, 4(1):16-27.
doi: 10.1186/s42397-021-00092-6
[9] 张素君, 周晓栋, 唐丽媛, 等. 杂交棉‘冀1518’纤维品质性状的QTL定位及遗传分析. 分子植物育种, 2021, 19(11):3627-3637.
[10] 齐海坤, 严根土, 王宁, 等. 陆地棉杂交后代产量和品质性状QTL定位. 河北农业大学学报, 2019, 42(1):1-7.
[11] Muhammad J, Jia F, Gong J W, et al. Identification of stable quantitative trait loci (QTLs) for fiber quality traits across multiple environments in Gossypium hirsutum recombinant inbred line population. BMC Genomics, 2016, 17:197.
doi: 10.1186/s12864-016-2560-2 pmid: 26951621
[12] 朱协飞, 王鹏, 司占峰, 等. 基于陆地棉背景的海岛棉染色体片段导入系产量性状QTL定位. 作物学报, 2017, 43(12):1784-1790.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2017.01784
[13] Hu Y, Chen J D, Fang L, et al. Gossypium barbadense and Gossypium hirsutum genomes provide insights into the origin and evolution of allotetraploid cotton. Nature Genetics, 2019, 51(4):739-748.
doi: 10.1038/s41588-019-0371-5 pmid: 30886425
[14] Wang M J, Tu L L, Yuan D J, et al. Reference genome sequences of two cultivated allotetraploid cottons, Gossypium hirsutum and Gossypium barbadense. Nature Genetics, 2019, 51(2):224-229.
doi: 10.1038/s41588-018-0282-x
[15] 王鹏.陆地棉TM-1背景的海岛棉染色体片段导入系的培育鉴定和纤维强度QTL精细定位. 南京:南京农业大学, 2009.
[16] Zhu W Y, Lin J, Yang D W, et al. Development of chromosome segment substitution lines derived from backcross between two sequenced rice cultivars, Indica recipient 93-11 and japonica donor Nipponbare. Plant Molecular Biology Reporter, 2009, 27 (2):126-131.
doi: 10.1007/s11105-008-0054-3
[17] Zhao L N, Zhou H J, Lu L X, et al. Identification of quantitative trait loci controlling rice mature seed cultivability chromosomal segment substitution lines. Plant Cell Reports, 2009, 28(2):247-256.
doi: 10.1007/s00299-008-0641-7
[18] Ali M L, Paul L, Yu S B, et al. Chromosome segment substitution lines: a powerful tool for the introgression of valuable genes from Oryza wild species into cultivated rice (O.sativa). Rice, 2010, 3 (4):218-234.
doi: 10.1007/s12284-010-9058-3
[19] 朱亚娟, 王鹏, 郭旺珍, 等. 利用海岛棉染色体片段导入系定位衣分和籽指QTL. 作物学报, 2010, 36(8):1318-1323.
[20] Eshed Y, Zamir D. An introgression line population of lycopersicon pennellii in the cultivated tomato enables the identification and fine mapping of yield-associated QTL. Genetics, 1995, 141(3):1147-1162.
doi: 10.1093/genetics/141.3.1147 pmid: 8582620
[21] 何风华, 席章营, 曾瑞珍, 等. 利用单片段代换系鉴定水稻株高及其构成因素的QTL. 中国水稻科学, 2005, 19(5):387-392.
[22] 王立秋, 赵永锋, 薛亚东, 等. 玉米衔接式单片段导入系群体的构建和评价. 作物学报, 2007, 33(4):663-668.
[23] 吴新儒, 刘树兵, 刘爱峰, 等. 小麦重要农艺性状QTL近等基因导入系的选育. 麦类作物学报, 2007, 27(4):583-588.
[24] 郭志军, 赵云雷, 陈伟, 等. 陆海高代回交群体抗黄萎病QTL定位. 棉花学报, 2019, 31(4):327-334.
[25] 戎福喜, 汤丽魁, 唐媛媛, 等. 海陆渐渗系棉花吐絮期叶绿素含量、荧光参数及相关性状的QTL定位分析. 棉花学报, 2015, 27(5):417-426.
[26] 赵君, 刘剑光, 吴巧娟, 等. 利用染色体片段代换系定位棉花抗黄萎病QTL. 棉花学报, 2014, 26(6):499-505.
[27] Wang P, Zhu Y J, Song X L, et al. Inheritance of long staple fiber quality traits of Gossypium barbadense in G. hirsutum background using CSILs. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 2012, 124(8):1415-1428.
doi: 10.1007/s00122-012-1797-7
[28] Cao Z B, Wang P, Zhu X F, et al. SSR marker-assisted improvement of fiber qualities in Gossypium hirsutum using G. barbadense introgression lines. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 2014, 127(3):587-594.
doi: 10.1007/s00122-013-2241-3
[29] 郭晓豪, 王寒涛, 魏鑫, 等. 基于两个陆地棉低世代群体定位纤维品质相关QTL. 棉花学报, 2021, 33(1):33-41.
[30] Zhao L, Lv Y D, Cai C P, et al. Toward allotetraploid cotton genome assembly: integration of a high-density molecular genetic linkage map with DNA sequence information. BMC Genomics, 2012, 13:539.
doi: 10.1186/1471-2164-13-539 pmid: 23046547
[31] 张军, 武耀廷, 郭旺珍, 等. 棉花微卫星标记的PAGE/银染快速检测. 棉花学报, 2000, 12(5):267-269.
[32] Zeng Z B. Precision mapping of quantitative trait loci. Genetics, 1994, 136(4):1457-1468.
doi: 10.1093/genetics/136.4.1457 pmid: 8013918
[33] McCouch S, Cho Y, Yano M, et al. Report on QTL nomenclature. Rice Genetics Newsletter, 1997, 14:11-13.
[34] Saha S, Wu J X, Jenkins J, et al. Effect of chromosome substitutions from Gossypium barbadense L. 3-79 into G. hirsutum L. TM-1 on agronomic and fiber traits. Journal of Cotton Science, 2004, 8:162-169.
[35] 杨泽茂, 李骏智, 李爱国, 等. 利用高代回交和分子标记辅助选择构建棉花染色体片段代换系. 分子植物育种, 2009, 7(2):233-241.
[36] 司占峰. 海岛棉背景的陆地棉染色体片段导入系培育及QTL定位. 南京:南京农业大学, 2016.
[37] 董承光, 王娟, 周小凤, 等. 基于表型性状的陆地棉种质资源遗传多样性分析. 植物遗传资源学报, 2016, 17(3):438-446.
doi: 10.13430/j.cnki.jpgr.2016.03.006
[38] 徐敏, 胡玉枢, 李憬霖, 等. 早熟棉创新种质资源主要性状聚类及相关分析. 作物杂志, 2017(1):25-31.
[39] 马留军, 石玉真, 兰孟焦, 等. 棉花陆海染色体片段代换系群体纤维产量与品质表现的评价. 棉花学报, 2013, 25(6):486-495.
[40] 代攀虹, 孙君灵, 何守朴, 等. 陆地棉核心种质表型性状遗传多样性分析及综合评价. 中国农业科学, 2016, 49(19):3694-3708.
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2016.19.003
[41] 李慧琴, 于娅, 王鹏, 等. 270份陆地棉种质资源农艺性状与品质性状的遗传多样性分析. 植物遗传资源学报, 2019, 20 (4):903-910.
[42] 焦梦佳, 陈煜, 宋章强, 等. 利用棉花优质渐渗系进行纤维品质性状和衣分的QTL定位. 植物遗传资源学报, 2020, 21(3):716-726.
doi: 10.13430/j.cnki.jpgr.20190919001
[43] Xu P, Gao J, Cao Z B, et al. Fine mapping and candidate gene analysis of qFL-chr1, a fiber length QTL in cotton. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 2017, 130(6):1309-1319.
doi: 10.1007/s00122-017-2890-8
[44] Wang F R, Xu Z Z, Sun R, et al. Genetic dissection of the introgressive genomic components from Gossypium barbadense L. that contribute to improved fiber quality in Gossypium hirsutum L.. Molecular Breeding, 2013, 32(3):547-562.
doi: 10.1007/s11032-013-9888-y
[45] Chen Y, Liu G D, Ma H H, et al. Identification of introgressed alleles conferring high fiber quality derived from Gossypium barbadense L. in secondary mapping populations of G. hirsutum L.. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2018, 9:1023-1023.
doi: 10.3389/fpls.2018.01023 pmid: 30073008
[1] 马春梅, 田阳青, 赵强, 李江余, 吴雪琴. 植物生长调节剂复配对棉花产量的影响[J]. 作物杂志, 2022, (6): 181–185
[2] 冯常辉, 焦春海, 张友昌, 别墅, 秦鸿德, 王琼珊, 张教海, 王孝刚, 夏松波, 蓝家样, 陈全求. 基于部分NCII交配设计的陆地棉产量和纤维品质性状遗传分析[J]. 作物杂志, 2022, (5): 13–21
[3] 徐敏, 金路路, 李瑞春, 孙丽园, 王子胜. 辽河流域棉区棉花化学封顶技术应用研究[J]. 作物杂志, 2022, (5): 201–207
[4] 罗含敏, 熊发前, 丘立杭, 刘菁, 段维兴, 高轶静, 覃夏燕, 吴建明, 李杨瑞, 刘俊仙. 性状相关的分子标记在甘蔗分子育种中的应用研究[J]. 作物杂志, 2022, (2): 35–43
[5] 闫晓翠, 段振盈, 杨华丽, 姚占军, 李在峰. 小麦品种周麦22抗叶锈病的QTL定位[J]. 作物杂志, 2022, (2): 69–74
[6] 余镁霞, 邓浩东, 谭景艾, 宋贵廷, 吴光亮, 陈利平, 刘睿琦, 邹安东, 贺浩华, 边建民. 利用染色体片段置换系定位低温影响水稻萌芽期根长和芽长QTL[J]. 作物杂志, 2021, (6): 36–45
[7] 张文, 刘铨义, 曾庆涛, 蔡晓莉, 冯杨, 逯涛. 不同株行距配置对机采棉成铃特性及纤维品质的影响[J]. 作物杂志, 2021, (2): 147–152
[8] 阿不都卡地尔·库尔班,夏东,张巨松,崔建平,郭仁松,林涛. 滴灌频次对化学脱叶棉花产量和品质影响机制的研究[J]. 作物杂志, 2019, (4): 113–119
[9] 唐丽媛,李兴河,张素君,王海涛,刘存敬,张香云,张建宏. 陆地棉光合相关性状的QTL定位分析[J]. 作物杂志, 2018, (5): 85–90
[10] 姜雪,马孝松,罗利军,刘鸿艳. 水稻苗期模拟干旱胁迫条件下表型性状QTL定位[J]. 作物杂志, 2016, (5): 31–37
[11] 张素君,唐丽媛,刘存敬,江振兴,迟吉娜,田海燕,李兴河,张建宏,张香云. 利用SSR标记对海岛棉纤维品质关联分析初探[J]. 作物杂志, 2016, (4): 93–100
[12] 马孟莉, 刘艳红, 雷恩, 等. 水稻千粒重QTL定位分析[J]. 作物杂志, 2015, (1): 43–45
[13] 马飞前, 刘小刚, 王红武, 等. 玉米茎秆纤维品质性状及其相关分析[J]. 作物杂志, 2014, (4): 44–48
[14] 黄莹莹, 邹德堂, 王敬国, 刘化龙, 兴旺, 马婧, 武琦. 水稻子粒锰、铁、锌、铜含量的QTL定位分析[J]. 作物杂志, 2012, (6): 77–81
[15] 李学慧, 申顺先, 李玉玲, 等. 利用种子性状QTL定位高油玉米蛋白质含量QTL[J]. 作物杂志, 2011, (4): 40–42
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!