检索
E-mail
RSS
高级检索 图表检索

当期目录 我要投稿 过刊浏览
高级检索 图表检索

作物杂志,2017, 第1期: 100–106 doi: 10.16035/j.issn.1001-7283.2017.01.019

• 生理生化·植物营养·栽培耕作 • 上一篇    下一篇

混合盐碱胁迫对高粱农艺性状及生理指标的影响

任根增1,高志远1,张瑜1,崔江慧1,张素梅2,常金华1   

  1. 1河北农业大学农学院,071000,河北保定
    2临城县农业局,054300,河北临城
  • 收稿日期:2016-10-24 修回日期:2016-12-28 出版日期:2017-02-15 发布日期:2018-08-26
  • 作者简介:任根增,在读博士,作物遗传育种专业;高志远为共同第一作者,本科,植物科学与技术201401班
  • 基金资助:
    河北省应用基础研究计划(15962905D);河北省教育厅青年基金(QN2015077)

The Influence of Mixed Salt and Alkali Stress on Physiological and Agronomic Traits of Sorghum

Ren Genzeng1,Gao Zhiyuan1,Zhang Yu1,Cui Jianghui1,Zhang Sumei2,Chang Jinhua1   

  1. 1College of Agronomy,Agricultural University of Hebei,Baoding 071000,Hebei,China
    2Agricultural Bureau of Lincheng County,Lincheng 054300,Hebei,China
  • Received:2016-10-24 Revised:2016-12-28 Online:2017-02-15 Published:2018-08-26

RichHTML

4

PDF (PC)

131

摘要：

通过测定耐盐碱性不同的3个高粱品种在混合盐碱胁迫下的农艺性状和相关生理指标,研究高粱全生育期农艺性状及生理指标对混合盐碱胁迫的响应,结果显示：高粱在整个生育时期随着盐碱胁迫的加强,净光合速率、蒸腾速率、气孔导度、叶绿素含量基本呈下降趋势,胞间CO2浓度则呈上升趋势。盐碱胁迫使高粱提前成熟,降低了各个高粱品种的株高、茎粗、穗重、千粒重等各项农艺指标值,不同品种对胁迫的响应存在差异。

关键词: 混合盐碱胁迫, 光合效率, 农艺性状

Abstract:

The agronomic traits and related physical signs of 3 sorghum cultivars under saline-alkali stress were investigated through the whole growth period. Results showed that net photosynthetic rate, transpiration rate, stomatal conductance, chlorophyll content decreased but intercellular CO2 concentration inncreased with the increase of saline-alkali stress. Mixed salt and alkali stress shortened the growth period of sorghum, and reduced the plant height, stem diameter, ear weight and grain yield. The responses of different varieties to the stress was significantly different.

Key words: Salt and alkali stress, Photosynthesis rate, Agronomic traits

表1

不同处理土壤生化指标"

处理
Treatment		 土壤化学性质Soil chemical properties
pH 土壤含盐量Soil salt content(%) K含量K content(mg/kg) Na含量Na content(mg/kg) Ca含量Ca content(mg/kg) Mg含量Mg content(mg/kg)
S0 7.42 0.06 80.2 250.4 412.5 324.5
S1 8.96 0.16 110.3 643.2 623.4 368.5
S2 9.25 0.36 120.3 1 228.5 800.2 425.8
S3 9.49 0.45 140.3 1 825.4 1 213.5 535.6

图1

3个高粱品种净光合速率的变化"

图2

3个高粱品种蒸腾速率的变化"

图3

3个高粱品种气孔导度的变化"

图4

3个高粱品种水分利用效率的变化"

图5

3个高粱品种胞间CO2浓度的变化"

图6

3个高粱品种SPAD变化"

表2

盐碱胁迫对高粱生育期影响"

品种Varieties 处理Treatment 播种期Sowing period 出苗期Seedling stage 拔节期Jointing stage 抽穗期Heading stage 乳熟期Milk-ripe stage
河农16 S0 05-03 05-08 06-19 07-25 09-15
Henong 16 S1 05-03 05-08 06-20 07-25 09-14
S2 05-03 05-09 06-22 07-28 09-13
S3 05-03 05-10 06-25 07-31 09-10
TAX623B S0 05-03 05-08 06-19 07-24 09-13
S1 05-03 05-08 06-20 07-27 09-10
S2 05-03 05-09 06-22 07-30 09-08
S3 05-03 05-11 06-26 07-25 09-05
高粱蔗 S0 05-03 05-08 06-21 07-26 09-18
Gaoliangzhe S1 05-03 05-10 06-21 07-27 09-18
S2 05-03 05-11 06-23 07-30 09-15
S3 05-03 05-12 06-24 08-03 09-12

表3

盐碱胁迫对高粱主要农艺性状影响"

品种
Varieties		 处理
Treatment		 株高(cm)
Plant height		 茎粗(mm)
Stem diameter		 穗重(g)
Panicle weight		 千粒重(g)
1000-grain weight		 穗重较对照下降幅度(%)
Output decline range
河农16 S0 156.5a 26.79a 65.5a 31.52a -
S1 154.2a 25.47a 60.3b 28.48b -7.94
S2 150.3b 23.56b 52.4c 26.51c -20.00
S3 145.5c 22.17c 48.2d 24.23d -26.41
TAX623B S0 137.5a 24.35a 50.3a 36.78a -
S1 135.4a 23.44a 48.7b 34.28b -3.18
S2 132.8b 22.17b 46.3c 32.14c -7.95
S3 130.6b 21.84c 38.5d 28.89d -23.46
高粱蔗 S0 221.7a 17.60a 29.6a 24.56a -
Gaoliangzhe S1 216.9a 15.42b 27.6b 22.64b -6.76
S2 208.4a 14.65c 25.7c 21.71c -13.18
S3 202.6b 13.56d 23.4d 20.85d -20.95
[1] Tahir A M, Naeem I, Hammad R . Growth modulation and ion partitioning in salt stressed sorghum (Sorghun biolori L.) by exogenous suppy of salicylic acid. Pakistan Journal of Botany, 2010,42(5):3047-3054.
[2] 赵福庚, 何龙飞, 罗庆云 . 植物逆境生理生态学.北京: 化学工业出版社, 2004: 137.
[3] Improvement in salt tolerance technology to increase productivity and decrease fresh water requirements for sorghum farming. DAVIS, Calif. (April 9,2009).
[4] Thakur M, Sharma A D . Salt stress and phytohormone (ABA)-induced changes in germination,sugars and enzymes of carbohydrate metabolism in Sorghum bicolor (L.)Moench seeds. Journal Agriculture and Social Science, 2005,1:89-93.
[5] 秦岭, 张华文, 杨延兵 , 等. 不同高粱品种种子萌发耐盐能力评价. 种子, 2009,28(11):7-10.
[6] 王秀玲, 程序, 李桂英 . 甜高粱耐盐材料的筛选及芽苗期耐盐性相关分析. 中国生态农业学报, 2010,18(6):1239-1244.
[7] 李志华 . 辽杂系列高粱杂交种耐盐性鉴定报告. 杂粮作物, 2008,28(5):305-306.
[8] Khan A A, Rao S A, McNeilly T. Assessment of salinity tolerance based upon seedling root growth response functions in maize (Zea mays L.). Euphytica, 2003,131:81-89.
doi: 10.1023/A:1023054706489
[9] Shafi M, Bakht J, Hassan M J , et al. Effect of cadmium and salinity stresses on growth and antioxidant enzyme activities of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Bulletin of Environmental and Contamination and Toxicology, 2009,82(6):772-776.
doi: 10.1007/s00128-009-9707-7
[10] Ganguly M, Roychoudhury A, Sarkar S N , et al. Inducibility of three salinity/abscisic acid-regulated promoters in transgenic rice with gusA reporter gene. Plant Cell Reports, 2011,30(9):1617-1625.
doi: 10.1007/s00299-011-1072-4
[11] Delauney A J, Verma P S . Proline biosynthesis and osmoregulation in plants. Plant Journal, 1993,4(2):215-223.
doi: 10.1046/j.1365-313X.1993.04020215.x
[12] Lee G, Carrow R N, Duncan R R . Photosynthetic responses to salinity stress of halophytic seashore paspalum ecotypes. Plant Science, 2004,166(6):1417-1425.
doi: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2003.12.029
[13] 王晨, 陈吉宝, 庞振凌 , 等. 甜高粱对混合盐碱胁迫的响应及耐盐碱种质鉴定.作物杂志, 2016(1):68-74.
[14] Kreps J A, Wu Y, Chang H S , et al. Transcriptome changes for arabidopsis in response to salt,osmotic,and cold stress. Plant Physiology, 2002,130:2129-2141.
doi: 10.1104/pp.008532
[15] Kawasaki S, Borchert C, Deyholos M , et al. Gene expression profiles during the initial phase of salt stress in rice. Plant Cell, 2001,13:889-905.
doi: 10.1105/tpc.13.4.889
[16] Moons A, Bauw G, Prinsen E , et al. Molecular and physiological responses to abscisic acid and salt in roots in salt-sensitive and salt tolerant indica rice varieties. Plant Physiology, 1995,107:177-186.
doi: 10.1104/pp.107.1.177
[17] Dombrowski J E . Salt stress activation of wound-related genes in tomato plants. Plant Physiology, 2003,132:2098-2107.
doi: 10.1104/pp.102.019927
[18] Shabala S, Lew R R . Turgor regulation in osmotically stressed arabidopsis thaliana epidermal root cells:direct support for the role of inorganic ion uptake as revealed by concurrent flux and cell turgor measurements. Plant Physiology, 2002,129:290-299.
doi: 10.1104/pp.020005
[19] Volkov V, Amtmann A . Thellungiella halophila,a salt-tolerant rela-tive of Arabidopsis thaliana has specific root ion-channel features supporting K+/Na+ homeostasis under salinity stress . Plant Journal, 2006,48:342-353.
doi: 10.1111/tpj.2006.48.issue-3
[20] Chen S, Li J, Wang S , et al. Salt,nutrient uptake and transport,and ABA of populus euphratica;ahybrid in response to increasing soil NaCl.Trees-Struct Funct, 2001,15:186-194.
doi: 10.1007/s004680100091
[21] Noaman M M, Dvorak J, Dong J M . Genes inducing salt tolerance in wheat,Lophopyrum elongatum and amphiploid and their responses to ABA under salt stress. Prospects for Saline Agriculture, 2002,37:139-144.
doi: 10.1007/978-94-017-0067-2
[22] Fricke W, Akhiyarova G, Veselov D , et al. Rapid and tissue-specific changes in ABA and in growth rate response to salinity in barley leaves. Journal of Experimental Botany, 2004,55:1115-1123.
doi: 10.1093/jxb/erh117
[23] 杨少辉, 季静, 王罡 , 等. 盐胁迫对植物影响的研究进展. 分子植物育种, 2006,4(3):139-142.
[24] 张立新, 李生秀 . 甜菜碱与植物抗旱/盐性研究进展. 西北植物学报, 2004,24(9):1765-1771.
[25] Bressan R A, Hasegaw A P M, Kononowicza K. Cell cycle duration in tobacco cells adapted to NaCl. Environmental and Experimental Botany, 1992,32(2):1-9.
doi: 10.1016/0098-8472(92)90024-V
[26] Piqueras A, H Ernandez J A, Olmos E, et al. Changes in antioxidant enzymes and organic solutes associated with adaptation of citrus cells to salt stress. Plant Cell Tissue and Organ Cultur, 1996,45(1):5-60.
[27] 郑文菊, 张承烈 . 盐生和中生环境中宁枸杞叶显微和超微结构的研究. 草业科学, 1998,7(3):72-76.
[28] Ouerghi Z, Cornic G, Roudani M , et al. Effect of NaCl on photosynthesis of two wheat species (Triticumdurum and T. aestivum) differing in their sensitivity to salt stress. Journal of Plant Physiology, 2000,156:335-340.
doi: 10.1016/S0176-1617(00)80071-1
[29] 赵昕 . NaCl胁迫对盐芥和拟南芥光合作用的影响. 植物学通报, 2007,24(2):154-160.
[30] Dunn G M, Neales T F . Are the effects o f salinity on growth and leaf gas exchange related. Photosynthetica, 1993,29:33-42.
[31] Bethke P C, Drew M C . Stomatal and non-stomatal components to inhibition of photosynthesis in leaves of Capsicum annuum during progressive exposure to NaCl salinity. Plant Physiology, 1992,99:219-226.
doi: 10.1104/pp.99.1.219
[32] 江行玉, 窦君霞, 王正秋 . NaCl对玉米和棉花光合作用与渗透调节能力影响的比较. 植物生理学通讯, 2001,37(4):303-305.
[33] 葛江丽, 姜闯道, 任大明 , 等. 盐胁迫条件下甜高粱幼苗的光合特性及光系统Ⅱ功能调节. 作物学报, 2007,33(8):1272-1278.
[1] 王 蕾 张想平 李润喜 牛小霞 杨世梅 严宗山 张自强. 大麦农艺性状和子粒支链淀粉的多元分析与评价[J]. 作物杂志, 2018, (5): 71–76
[2] 魏萌涵, 解慧芳, 邢璐, 宋慧, 王淑君, 王素英, 刘海萍, 付楠, 刘金荣. 华北地区谷子产量与农艺性状的综合评价分析[J]. 作物杂志, 2018, (4): 42–47
[3] 章星传, 黄文轩, 朱宽宇, 王志琴, 杨建昌. 施氮量对不同水稻品种氮肥利用率与农艺性状的影响[J]. 作物杂志, 2018, (4): 69–78
[4] 张春明,赵雪英,闫虎斌,朱慧珺,张泽燕,张耀文. 覆膜方式和密度对旱地绿豆光合特性及产量的影响[J]. 作物杂志, 2018, (3): 108–115
[5] 张彬,李金秀,王震,冯浩,李金榜. 小麦主要农艺性状的相关性及聚类分析[J]. 作物杂志, 2018, (3): 57–60
[6] 张帅,庞玉辉,王征宏,王黎明,陈春燕,曾占奎,王春平. 小麦种质资源农艺性状变异及其遗传多样性分析[J]. 作物杂志, 2018, (2): 44–51
[7] 岳茂林,薛蔚荣,张瑞栋,岳忠孝,吕瑞洲,郭鹏燕. 不同行距配置对谷子农艺性状及产量的影响[J]. 作物杂志, 2018, (2): 93–96
[8] 卢军帅,李云祥,王兴富,高国花,杨霞,梁婧. 高密度对甘肃黄灌区玉米品种农艺性状和产量的影响[J]. 作物杂志, 2018, (2): 97–102
[9] 张锐新,任天宝,赵喆,闻刚,赵铭钦. 移栽期对五指山雪茄烟品质及主要经济性状的影响[J]. 作物杂志, 2018, (2): 148–153
[10] 郜战宁,冯辉,薛正刚,杨永乾,王树杰,潘正茂. 28个大麦品种（系）主要农艺性状分析[J]. 作物杂志, 2018, (1): 77–82
[11] 赵莉,汪强,林勇翔,张祎. 江淮黄褐土壤芝麻肥效研究[J]. 作物杂志, 2017, (6): 154–159
[12] 郭鹏燕,王彩萍,任杰成,赵吉平,许瑛,岳茂林. 不同地理来源绿豆农艺性状的遗传多样性研究[J]. 作物杂志, 2017, (6): 55–59
[13] 吕伟,刘文萍,任果香,文飞,韩俊梅,王若鹏. 不同浓度生根粉对芝麻生长及产量的影响[J]. 作物杂志, 2017, (5): 100–105
[14] 卢楠楠,闫丽华,郑崇珂,尹海波,郭善利,谢先芝. 盐胁迫对水稻盐丰47和盐粳456生长和农艺性状的影响[J]. 作物杂志, 2017, (5): 106–111
[15] 闫寒,宋杭霖,张丽,闫晶,石贤吉,朱诗苗,刘璐,李虎林. 镉胁迫对烤烟农艺性状及生理生化指标的影响[J]. 作物杂志, 2017, (5): 156–161
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 赵广才,常旭虹,王德梅,陶志强,王艳杰,杨玉双,朱英杰. 小麦生产概况及其发展[J]. 作物杂志, 2018, (4): 1 –7 .
[2] 权宝全,白冬梅,田跃霞,薛云云. 不同源库关系对花生光合特性及产量的影响[J]. 作物杂志, 2018, (4): 102 –105 .
[3] 黄学芳,黄明镜,刘化涛,赵聪,王娟玲. 覆膜穴播条件下降水年型和群体密度对张杂谷5号分蘖成穗及产量的影响[J]. 作物杂志, 2018, (4): 106 –113 .
[4] 黄文辉, 王会, 梅德圣. 农作物抗倒性研究进展[J]. 作物杂志, 2018, (4): 13 –19 .
[5] 赵云,徐彩龙,杨旭,李素真,周静,李继存,韩天富,吴存祥. 不同播种方式对麦茬夏大豆保苗和生产效益的影响[J]. 作物杂志, 2018, (4): 114 –120 .
[6] 陆梅,孙敏,任爱霞,雷妙妙,薛玲珠,高志强. 喷施叶面肥对旱地小麦生长的影响及与产量的关系[J]. 作物杂志, 2018, (4): 121 –125 .
[7] 王晓飞,徐海军,郭梦桥,肖宇,程薪宇,刘淑霞,关向军,吴耀坤,赵伟华,魏国江. 播期、密度及施肥对寒地油用型紫苏产量的影响[J]. 作物杂志, 2018, (4): 126 –130 .
[8] 朱鹏锦,庞新华,梁春,谭秦亮,严霖,周全光,欧克维. 低温胁迫对甘蔗幼苗活性氧代谢和抗氧化酶的影响[J]. 作物杂志, 2018, (4): 131 –137 .
[9] 高杰,李青风,彭秋,焦晓燕,王劲松. 不同养分配比对糯高粱物质生产及氮磷钾利用效率的影响[J]. 作物杂志, 2018, (4): 138 –142 .
[10] 商娜,杨中旭,李秋芝,尹会会,王士红,李海涛,李彤,张晗. 鲁西地区常规棉聊棉6号留叶枝栽培的适宜密度研究[J]. 作物杂志, 2018, (4): 143 –148 .