灰色多维综合分析在紫肉甘薯品种评价中的应用

doi:10.16035/j.issn.1001-7283.2017.04.010

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

为紫肉甘薯品种的选育工作提供依据,采用灰色关联多维度综合分析法对14个紫肉甘薯品种的9个性状进行分析和评价。结果表明:参试品种的优劣顺序为福宁紫3号、龙紫4号、福薯404、榕薯910、泉薯22、泉薯32、榕薯32、泉薯9-6、福薯006、龙紫5号、榕薯52、莆紫薯5号、徐紫薯2号和龙紫7号。加权关联度的评价结果与品种表现吻合。

关键词: 灰色多维综合分析, 紫肉甘薯, 品种评价

Abstract:

In order to provide basis for purple sweet potato breeding, the grey multidimensional relation analysis was used to analyze and evaluate 9 agronomic traits of 14 purple sweet potato varieties. The results showed that the order of excellence in tested varieties was as below: Funingzi No.3, Longzi No.4, Fushu404, Rongshu910, Quanshu22, Quanshu32, Rongshu32, Quanshu9-6, Fushu006, Longzi No.5, Rongshu52, Puzishu No.5, Xuzishu No.2 and Longzi No.7. The result of the weighted incidence degree was anastomotic with the varieties performance.

Key words: Grey multidimensional relation analysis, Purple sweet potato, Evaluation of variety

鄢铮,张小红,王正荣. 灰色多维综合分析在紫肉甘薯品种评价中的应用[J]. 作物杂志, 2017 (4): 58–62

Zheng Yan,Xiaohong Zhang,Zhengrong Wang. Application of Grey Multidimensional Relation Analysis in Evaluation of Purple Sweet Potato Varieties[J]. Crops, 2017(4): 58–62

图/表 6

表1

表2

表3

表4

表5

表6

参考文献 14

[1]	Pool Z B L, Bub A, Schroder N , et al. Anthocyanins are potent antioxidants in model systems but do not reduce endogenous oxidative DNA damage in human colon cell. European Journal of Nutrition, 1999,38(5):227-234. doi: 10.1007/s003940050065
[2]	Furuta S, Suda I , Nishiba Y,et al.High ter-butylperoxyl radical scavenging activity of sweet potato cultivars with purple flesh. Food Science & Technology International Tokyo, 1998,4(1):33-35.
[3]	蒲运东, 傅玉凡 . 紫肉甘薯的保健功能及其利用.科技资讯, 2010(13):237-238. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-3791.2010.13.207
[4]	周清元, 张建奎, 王季春 , 等. 甘薯早代品系部分数量性状的遗传相关分析. 西南农业大学学报, 2001,23(3):222-224. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-9868.2001.03.011
[5]	汪宝卿, 王庆美, 张海燕 , 等. 北方区试中甘薯农艺性状与产量的多元回归和通径分析. 中国农学通报, 2011,27(5):120-125.
[6]	李强, 马代夫, 李洪民 , 等. 灰色关联度分析在甘薯品种综合评价上的应用. 杂粮作物, 2001,21(1):15-18.
[7]	杨秀莲, 郑晓昆, 杨燕 , 等. 基于灰色关联度分析的甘薯品种评价.长江蔬菜, 2012(10):8-11. doi: 10.3865/j.issn.1001-3547.2012.10.003
[8]	王晓庆, 徐娟, 黄洁 , 等. 红黄肉甘薯性状的灰色关联度分析及营养食味评价. 西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2013,41(2):53-60.
[9]	顾东东, 胡春霞, 傅玉凡 , 等. 紫肉甘薯新品种“渝紫薯7号”产量、食用品质的表现及其稳定性分析. 西南大学学报(自然科学版), 2015,37(6):35-42.
[10]	黄洁, 甘学德, 许瑞丽 , 等. 21份紫肉甘薯种质资源的营养品质及其产量评价. 福建农业学报, 2011,26(2):215-222.
[11]	毛建霏, 周虹, 雷绍荣 , 等. 高效液相色谱法测定紫甘薯花青素含量. 西南农业学报, 2012,25(1):123-127. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4829.2012.01.026
[12]	方树民, 陈玉森 . 甘薯品种对甘薯瘟和蔓割病的兼抗反应测定. 植物保护, 1995,21(3):34-35.
[13]	邓聚龙 . 农业系统灰色理论与方法.济南: 山东科技出版社, 1988.
[14]	郭瑞林 . 作物灰色育种学.北京: 中国农业科技出版社, 1995: 22-48.

Metrics

Viewed

Full text

Abstract

Cited

Shared

Discussed

本文评价

推荐阅读 10

[1]	赵广才,常旭虹,王德梅,陶志强,王艳杰,杨玉双,朱英杰. 小麦生产概况及其发展[J]. 作物杂志, 2018, (4): 1 –7 .
[2]	权宝全,白冬梅,田跃霞,薛云云. 不同源库关系对花生光合特性及产量的影响[J]. 作物杂志, 2018, (4): 102 –105 .
[3]	黄学芳,黄明镜,刘化涛,赵聪,王娟玲. 覆膜穴播条件下降水年型和群体密度对张杂谷5号分蘖成穗及产量的影响[J]. 作物杂志, 2018, (4): 106 –113 .
[4]	黄文辉, 王会, 梅德圣. 农作物抗倒性研究进展[J]. 作物杂志, 2018, (4): 13 –19 .
[5]	赵云,徐彩龙,杨旭,李素真,周静,李继存,韩天富,吴存祥. 不同播种方式对麦茬夏大豆保苗和生产效益的影响[J]. 作物杂志, 2018, (4): 114 –120 .
[6]	陆梅,孙敏,任爱霞,雷妙妙,薛玲珠,高志强. 喷施叶面肥对旱地小麦生长的影响及与产量的关系[J]. 作物杂志, 2018, (4): 121 –125 .
[7]	王晓飞,徐海军,郭梦桥,肖宇,程薪宇,刘淑霞,关向军,吴耀坤,赵伟华,魏国江. 播期、密度及施肥对寒地油用型紫苏产量的影响[J]. 作物杂志, 2018, (4): 126 –130 .
[8]	朱鹏锦,庞新华,梁春,谭秦亮,严霖,周全光,欧克维. 低温胁迫对甘蔗幼苗活性氧代谢和抗氧化酶的影响[J]. 作物杂志, 2018, (4): 131 –137 .
[9]	高杰,李青风,彭秋,焦晓燕,王劲松. 不同养分配比对糯高粱物质生产及氮磷钾利用效率的影响[J]. 作物杂志, 2018, (4): 138 –142 .
[10]	商娜,杨中旭,李秋芝,尹会会,王士红,李海涛,李彤,张晗. 鲁西地区常规棉聊棉6号留叶枝栽培的适宜密度研究[J]. 作物杂志, 2018, (4): 143 –148 .

品种 Variety	鲜薯产量 Yield of fresh root tuber (kg/hm²)	茎叶产量 Yield of stem and leaf (kg/hm²)	薯块干物率 Dry matter content of root tuber (%)	单株结薯数Root tuber number per plant	大中薯率 Percent of big- and middle- root tuber (%)	单株分枝数 Branch number per plant	最长蔓长 Length of the longest vine (cm)	花青素含量Anthocyanidin content (mg/100g)	蔓割病指数Disease index of Fusarium oxysporum
X₀	34 762.35	8 940.0	30.6	3.5	91.28	6.8	150	40.00	20.00
X₁	25 668.45	10 890.0	21.2	2.5	82.34	7.3	111	12.21	30.27
X₂	24 036.15	17 460.0	29.7	2.7	80.11	10.2	157	22.37	29.14
X₃	32 364.30	13 177.5	23.9	3.6	83.16	7.1	126	17.15	29.56
X₄	32 944.95	14 902.5	23.8	2.7	88.13	6.8	103	13.57	22.87
X₅	28 175.55	12 255.0	30.6	4.3	58.67	6.4	65	10.22	31.62
X₆	29 170.20	15 165.0	26.9	3.1	80.52	5.7	97	10.67	15.28
X₇	34 762.35	14 437.5	28.3	3.9	90.58	6.7	117	8.27	53.19
X₈	22 618.95	18 202.5	25.4	2.9	89.31	8.3	123	10.84	28.54
X₉	30 117.15	16 185.0	27.8	3.9	91.28	6.3	103	28.33	77.25
X₁₀	17 315.85	11 512.5	29.8	3.0	78.42	5.1	71	40.38	39.31
X₁₁	26 163.15	13 845.0	25.3	3.5	74.62	4.3	307	35.41	95.15
X₁₂	19 013.55	8 940.0	28.1	3.3	76.17	5.1	111	14.12	71.28
X₁₃	31 535.40	19 912.5	28.7	2.2	76.32	7.2	129	17.56	64.15
X₁₄	30 849.45	13 455.0	28.2	3.5	81.57	8.6	179	36.46	18.69

品种 Variety	鲜薯产量 Yield of fresh root tuber	茎叶产量 Yield of stem and leaf	薯块干物率 Dry matter content of root tuber	单株结薯数 Root tuber number per plant	大中薯率 Percent of big- and middle- root tuber	单株分枝数 Branch number per plant	最长蔓长 Length of the longest vine	花青素含量 Anthocyanidin content	蔓割病指数 Disease index of Fusarium oxysporum
X₀	1.0000	1.0000	1.0000	1.0000	1.0000	1.0000	1.0000	1.0000	1.0000
X₁	0.7384	1.2181	0.6928	0.7143	0.9021	1.0735	0.7400	0.3053	1.5135
X₂	0.6914	1.9530	0.9706	0.7714	0.8776	1.5000	1.0467	0.5593	1.4570
X₃	0.9310	1.4740	0.7810	1.0286	0.9110	1.0441	0.8400	0.4288	1.4780
X₄	0.9477	1.6669	0.7778	0.7714	0.9655	1.0000	0.6867	0.3393	1.1435
X₅	0.8105	1.3708	1.0000	1.2286	0.6427	0.9412	0.4333	0.2555	1.5810
X₆	0.8391	1.6963	0.8791	0.8857	0.8821	0.8382	0.6467	0.2668	0.7640
X₇	1.0000	1.6149	0.9248	1.1143	0.9923	0.9853	0.7800	0.2068	2.6595
X₈	0.6507	2.0361	0.8301	0.8286	0.9784	1.2206	0.8200	0.2710	1.4270
X₉	0.8664	1.8104	0.9085	1.1143	1.0000	0.9265	0.6867	0.7083	3.8625
X₁₀	0.4981	1.2878	0.9739	0.8571	0.8591	0.7500	0.4733	1.0095	1.9655
X₁₁	0.7526	1.5487	0.8271	1.0000	0.8175	0.6324	2.0467	0.8853	4.7575
X₁₂	0.5470	1.0000	0.9193	0.9429	0.8345	0.7500	0.7400	0.3530	3.5640
X₁₃	0.9072	2.2273	0.9379	0.6286	0.8361	1.0588	0.8600	0.4390	3.2075
X₁₄	0.8874	1.5050	0.9216	1.0000	0.8936	1.2647	1.1933	0.9115	0.9345

品种 Variety	鲜薯产量 Yield of fresh root tuber	茎叶产量 Yield of stem and leaf	薯块干物率 Dry matter content of root tuber	单株结薯数 Root tuber number per plant	大中薯率 Percent of big- and middle- root tuber	单株分枝数 Branch number per plant	最长蔓长 Length of the longest vine	花青素含量 Anthocyanidin content	蔓割病指数 Disease index of Fusarium oxysporum
X₁	0.2616	0.2181	0.3072	0.2857	0.0979	0.0735	0.2600	0.6948	0.5135
X₂	0.3086	0.9530	0.0294	0.2286	0.1224	0.5000	0.0467	0.4408	0.4570
X₃	0.0690	0.4740	0.2190	0.0286	0.0890	0.0441	0.1600	0.5713	0.4780
X₄	0.0523	0.6669	0.2222	0.2286	0.0345	0.0000	0.3133	0.6608	0.1435
X₅	0.1895	0.3708	0.0000	0.2286	0.3573	0.0588	0.5667	0.7445	0.5810
X₆	0.1609	0.6963	0.1209	0.1143	0.1179	0.1618	0.3533	0.7333	0.2360
X₇	0.0000	0.6149	0.0752	0.1143	0.0077	0.0147	0.2200	0.7933	1.6595
X₈	0.3493	1.0361	0.1699	0.1714	0.0216	0.2206	0.1800	0.7290	0.4270
X₉	0.1336	0.8104	0.0915	0.1143	0.0000	0.0735	0.3133	0.2918	2.8625
X₁₀	0.5019	0.2878	0.0261	0.1429	0.1409	0.2500	0.5267	0.0095	0.9655
X₁₁	0.2474	0.5487	0.1729	0.0000	0.1825	0.3676	1.0467	0.1148	3.7575
X₁₂	0.4530	0.0000	0.0807	0.0571	0.1655	0.2500	0.2600	0.6470	2.5640
X₁₃	0.0928	1.2273	0.0621	0.3714	0.1639	0.0588	0.1400	0.5610	2.2075
X₁₄	0.1126	0.5050	0.0784	0.0000	0.1064	0.2647	0.1933	0.0885	0.0655

项目 Item	鲜薯产量 Yield of fresh root tuber	茎叶产量 Yield of stem and leaf	薯块干物率 Dry matter content of root tuber	单株结薯数 Root tuber number per plant	大中薯率 Percent of big- and middle- root tuber	单株分枝数 Branch number per plant	最长蔓长 Length of the longest vine	花青素含量 Anthocyanidin content	蔓割病指数 Disease index of Fusarium oxysporum
关联度 Correlation degree	0.9040	0.7708	0.9425	0.9291	0.9442	0.9226	0.8605	0.7984	0.6824
权重Weight	0.1166	0.0994	0.1215	0.1198	0.1218	0.1190	0.1110	0.1030	0.0880

品种 Variety	等权关联度 Weighted correlation degree	加权关联度 Unweighted correlation degree
X₁	0.8675	0.8718
X₂	0.8575	0.8633
X₃	0.8957	0.9026
X₄	0.8894	0.8939
X₅	0.8548	0.8612
X₆	0.8716	0.8768
X₇	0.8639	0.8791
X₈	0.8503	0.8576
X₉	0.8455	0.8625
X₁₀	0.8690	0.8749
X₁₁	0.8044	0.8192
X₁₂	0.8424	0.8543
X₁₃	0.8234	0.8393
X₁₄	0.9269	0.9283