作物杂志,2018, 第3期: 61–67 doi: 10.16035/j.issn.1001-7283.2018.03.010

• 遗传育种·种质资源·生物技术 • 上一篇    下一篇

4个谷子不育系主要农艺性状的配合力分析

李志华1,穆婷婷1,刘鑫2,李会霞2,田岗2   

  1. 1 山西省农业科学院高粱研究所,030600,山西晋中
    2 山西省农业科学院谷子研究所,046011,山西长治
  • 收稿日期:2017-12-27 修回日期:2018-02-10 出版日期:2018-06-20 发布日期:2018-06-20
  • 作者简介:李志华,助理研究员,主要从事谷子杂交育种与栽培
  • 基金资助:
    山西省农业科学院种业发展专项科研项目“谷子杂种优势利用研究与强优势组合选育”(2016zyzx20);山西省农业科学院高粱研究所所级课题“高异交结实谷子中晚熟高度雄性不育系的选育”(GLS2016-13)

Combining Ability Analysis of Main Agronomic Characters of Four Millet Sterile Lines

Li Zhihua1,Mu Tingting1,Liu Xin2,Li Huixia2,Tian Gang2   

  1. 1 Institute of Sorghum, Shanxi Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Jinzhong 030600, Shanxi, China
    2 Institute of Millet, Shanxi Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Changzhi 046011, Shanxi, China
  • Received:2017-12-27 Revised:2018-02-10 Online:2018-06-20 Published:2018-06-20

摘要:

为测定4个谷子不育系的育种应用潜力,将4个不育系与5个恢复系按NCII不完全双列杂交方式配组,对其杂种F1的7个主要农艺性状进行配合力分析,结果表明:所有组合的7个主要农艺性状存在显著差异。配合力分析,新选育不育系Y1A、Y2A一般配合力都一般,Y1A有利于选配大穗杂交谷子,Y2A则有利于选配矮秆、子粒饱满的杂交谷子;当地常用的2个不育系张1A、晋1A中,晋1A的一般配合力明显好于张1A,说明晋1A更适合于谷子中晚熟种植区。4个不育系所组配的20个组合中杂种优势不明显,7个主要农艺性状中,晋1A所组配的组合综合性状几乎都最优,组合晋1A×沧239产量最高;Y1A、Y2A和张1A所配组合综合性状高低各不相同。产量前3的组合分别为晋1A×沧239、Y2A×衡优17和张1A×朝阳谷子。分析表明,要想有强优势组合,不仅需要有较高的一般配合力亲本,亲本间还要有较高的特殊配合力。

关键词: 谷子, 不育系, 一般配合力, 特殊配合力

Abstract:

In order to determine the potential breeding of four millet CMS lines, the four CMS lines and five restorer lines were planted in NCII incomplete diallel cross, and the combining ability analysis of seven main agronomic traits of hybrid F1 was conducted. The results showed that there were significant differences among the seven major agronomic traits in all combinations. According to the analysis of combining ability, the new breeding sterile lines Y1A and Y2A were generally in the general combining ability and Y1A was good for matching big ears, Y2A was good for matching dwarf and full grains of hybrid millet. The common combination of the two sterile line jin 1A was obviously better than zhang 1A, indicating that jin 1A was more suitable for the middle-late growing areas in millet. In the group of 4 sterile lines, there were no obvious heterosis in the group of 20 combinations. Among the 7 main agronomic traits, the combined composite characters of jin 1A were almost the best, and the combination of Jin 1A×Cang 239 had the highest yield in the group. The combined properties of Y1A, Y2A and Zhang 1A were in different levels. The top three parts of the production were Jin 1A×Cang 239, Y2A×Hengyou 17 and Zhang 1A×Chaoyang millet. The analysis showed that in order to have a strong combination advantages, it was necessary not only to have a higher general combining ability of parents, but also to have a higher special combining ability.

Key words: Millet, CMS, General combining ability, Special combining ability

表1

9个亲本性状表现"

亲本
Parent
株高(cm)
Plant height
穗长(cm)
Ear length
穗粗(cm)
Spike width
穗重(g)
Ear weight
穗粒重(g)
Grain weight per ear
千粒重(g)
1000-grain weight
Y1A 114.67 23.50 2.30 - - 3.34
Y2A 100.17 19.17 2.10 - - 3.07
张1A Zhang 1A 113.95 20.83 2.60 - - 3.64
晋1A Jin 1A 124.97 22.50 2.20 - - 3.43
朝阳谷子Chaoyangguzi 154.83 25.27 2.70 21.91 16.75 3.02
衡优17 Hengyou 17 156.30 25.93 2.70 20.00 14.40 2.76
冀谷20 Jigu 20 131.00 23.83 2.90 23.75 17.66 2.79
冀谷26 Jigu 26 138.17 23.57 2.10 23.42 18.65 3.10
沧239 Cang 239 134.33 22.17 2.35 27.38 22.51 3.05

表2

各组合性状分析"

组合
Combination
株高(cm)
Plant height
穗长(cm)
Ear length
穗粗(cm)
Spike width
穗重(g)
Ear weight
穗粒重(g)
Grain weight per ear
千粒重(g)
1000-grain weight
产量(kg/hm2)
Yield
Y1A×朝阳谷子
Y1A×Chaoyangguzi
139.11 27.77 2.52 33.14 26.38 3.16 4 420.15
Y1A×衡优17
Y1A×Hengyou 17
139.00 27.49 2.40 31.10 26.90 2.96 2 457.95
Y1A×冀谷20
Y1A×Jigu 20
142.11 28.15 2.56 33.93 26.70 3.00 3 517.43
Y1A×冀谷26
Y1A×Jigu 26
131.33 26.55 2.35 32.51 27.52 2.98 3 695.65
Y1A×沧239
Y1A×Cang 239
124.33 24.10 2.33 26.08 22.93 3.04 3 904.76
Y2A×朝阳谷子
Y2A×Chaoyangguzi
132.89 24.07 2.43 26.07 22.63 3.13 3 118.28
Y2A×衡优17
Y2A×Hengyou 17
145.67 21.80 2.47 30.02 24.47 3.35 4 915.40
Y2A×冀谷20
Y2A×Jigu 20
128.44 24.72 2.41 30.75 25.46 3.03 4 553.42
Y2A×冀谷26
Y2A×Jigu 26
122.78 23.87 2.52 35.76 31.44 2.97 4 154.09
Y2A×沧239
Y1A×Cang 239
122.33 24.08 2.37 33.69 27.94 3.15 4 520.00
张1A×朝阳谷子
Zhang 1A×Chaoyangguzi
139.33 24.56 2.46 33.64 29.82 3.09 4 899.60
张1A×衡优17
Zhang 1A×Hengyou 17
137.00 24.52 2.37 29.82 25.76 2.88 4 706.33
组合
Combination
株高(cm)
Plant height
穗长(cm)
Ear length
穗粗(cm)
Spike width
穗重(g)
Ear weight
穗粒重(g)
Grain weight per ear
千粒重(g)
1000-grain weight
产量(kg/hm2)
Yield
张1A×冀谷20
Zhang 1A×Jigu 20
123.89 21.39 2.36 24.50 20.88 3.13 4 228.44
张1A×冀谷26
Zhang 1A×Jigu 26
124.11 24.04 2.50 32.21 28.39 2.87 4 266.67
张1A×沧239
Zhang 1A×Cang 239
127.56 24.15 2.57 36.49 30.05 2.99 4 722.90
晋1A×朝阳谷子
Jin 1A×Chaoyangguzi
141.56 29.32 2.67 34.80 23.00 3.21 4 569.18
晋1A×衡优17
Jin 1A×Hengyou 17
136.89 24.55 2.12 26.15 21.99 3.17 4 257.93
晋1A×冀谷20
Jin 1A×Jigu 20
134.22 27.93 2.71 34.87 32.15 3.25 4 752.67
晋1A×冀谷26
Jin 1A×Jigu 26
136.00 25.42 2.69 33.62 27.95 3.11 4 804.17
晋1A×沧239
Jin 1A×Cang 239
132.56 24.81 2.66 34.61 30.03 3.20 4 922.00

表3

配合力方差分析"

变异来源
Source of variation
株高
Plant height
穗长
Ear length
穗粗
Spike width
穗重
Ear weight
穗粒重
Grain weight per ear
千粒重
1000-grain weight
产量
Yield
组合Combination 4.82** 4.28** 1.58** 2.53** 2.70** 4.54** 1.00**
P1 1.85** 5.85** 0.96** 0.20 0.06 5.27** 2.96**
P2 5.09** 1.20** 1.07** 0.71** 1.04** 1.19** 0.31
P1×P2 2.42** 2.36** 1.57** 3.12** 3.14** 2.65** 0.86**

表4

GCA效应值"

亲本
Parent
株高
Plant height
穗长
Ear length
穗粗
Spike width
穗重
Ear weight
穗粒重
Grain weight per ear
千粒重
1000-grain weight
产量
Yield
Y1A 1.5950 6.5469 -1.6078 -0.9118 -1.6379 -1.8054 -15.2671
Y2A -1.9791 -5.7879 -1.3085 -1.7986 -0.4938 1.3622 0.1072
张1A Zhang 1A -2.0125 -5.6925 -0.9283 -0.9763 1.7401 -2.9514 7.4654
晋1A Jin 1A 2.3967 4.9335 3.8445 3.6866 0.3916 3.3946 7.6945
朝阳谷子Chaoyangguzi 3.8831 5.0289 1.9273 0.8555 -3.9988 2.0811 0.0969
衡优17 Hengyou 17 4.9478 -2.2830 -5.3330 -7.4888 -6.5602 0.2838 -3.8440
冀谷20 Jigu 20 -0.6681 1.5220 1.5330 -2.7158 -2.7261 0.6081 -2.1901
冀谷26 Jigu 26 -3.3820 -0.7729 1.5532 5.9557 8.6944 -3.3243 -0.4129
沧239 Cang 239 -4.7808 -3.4950 0.3195 3.3933 4.5906 0.3514 6.3501

表5

SCA效应值"

组合
Combination
株高
Plant height
穗长
Ear length
穗粗
Spike width
穗重
Ear weight
穗粒重
Grain weight per ear
千粒重
1000-grain weight
产量
Yield
Y1A×朝阳谷子
Y1A×Chaoyangguzi
4.5511 10.3539 2.0487 4.7270 -0.5172 2.5405 4.0602
Y1A×衡优17
Y1A×Hengyou 17
4.4676 9.2412 -2.7646 -1.6981 1.4400 -3.9459 -42.1344
Y1A×冀谷20
Y1A×Jigu 20
6.8058 11.8639 3.7070 7.2333 0.6744 -2.7568 -17.1918
Y1A×冀谷26
Y1A×Jigu 26
-1.2944 5.5058 -5.1510 2.7581 3.7591 -3.4595 -12.9961
Y1A×沧239
Y1A×Cang 239
-6.5553 -4.2302 -5.8790 -17.5792 -13.5460 -1.4054 -8.0732
Y2A×朝阳谷子
Y2A×Chaoyangguzi
-0.1253 -4.3494 -1.6321 -17.6172 -14.6622 1.5135 -26.5887
Y2A×衡优17
Y2A×Hengyou 17
9.4781 -13.3700 -0.0546 -5.1177 -7.7424 8.7568 15.7195
Y2A×冀谷20
Y2A×Jigu 20
-3.4656 -1.7664 -2.4410 -5.7403 -4.0016 -1.8919 7.1977
Y2A×冀谷26
Y2A×Jigu 26
-7.7244 -5.1442 1.8060 13.0232 18.5678 -3.6216 -2.2034
Y2A×沧239
Y1A×Cang 239
-8.0585 -4.3096 -4.2207 6.4590 5.3693 2.0541 6.4109
张1A×朝阳谷子
Zhang1A×Chaoyangguzi
4.7182 -2.4022 -1.6321 6.3294 12.4437 0.1081 15.3476
张1A×衡优17
Zhang1A×Hengyou 17
2.9645 -2.5611 -0.0546 -5.7687 -2.8703 -6.5405 10.7976
张1A×冀谷20
Zhang1A×Jigu 20
-6.8894 -14.9993 -2.4410 -22.5569 -21.2539 1.5676 -0.4531
张1A×冀谷26
Zhang1A×Jigu 26
-6.7223 -4.4686 1.8060 1.7942 7.0701 -6.9189 0.4470
张1A×沧239
Zhang1A×Cang 239
-4.1336 -4.0315 -4.2207 15.3208 13.3111 -2.9730 11.1878
晋1A×朝阳谷子
Jin1A×Chaoyangguzi
6.3883 16.5133 7.7922 9.9828 -13.2594 4.1622 7.5686
晋1A×衡优17
Jin1A×Hengyou 17
2.8810 -2.4419 -14.4134 -17.3707 -17.0681 2.8649 0.2412
晋1A×冀谷20
Jin1A×Jigu 20
0.8768 10.9897 9.6123 10.2009 13.6769 5.5135 1.6868
晋1A×冀谷26
Jin1A×Jigu 26
2.2129 1.0153 8.6416 6.2472 5.3807 0.7027 13.1009
晋1A×沧239
Jin1A×Cang 239
-0.3758 -1.4087 7.5899 9.3729 13.2281 3.7297 15.8749

表6

各性状相关遗传参数"

遗传参数
Genetic parameter
株高
Plant height
穗长
Ear length
穗粗
Spike width
穗重
Ear weight
穗粒重
Grain weight per ear
千粒重
1000-grain weight
产量
Yield
GCA方差Vg (%) 67.04 63.87 4.38 0.00 1.45 59.33 100.0
SCA方差Vs (%) 32.96 36.13 95.62 100.00 98.55 40.67 0.0
广义遗传力hB2 (%) 30.04 25.56 5.14 16.13 16.48 26.68 14.4
狭义遗传力hN2 (%) 20.14 16.32 0.23 0.00 0.24 15.83 14.4
[1] 余传元, 雷建国 . 中国超级水稻育种的理论与实践. 江西农业学报, 2001(1):51-59.
[2] 程式华 . 中国超级稻育种技术创新与应用. 中国农业科学, 2016,49(2):205-206.
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2016.02.001
[3] 李志华, 景小兰, 穆婷婷 . 谷子雄性不育系利用及存在问题 . 中国种业, 2016(6):11-13.
[4] 金莎 . 我国中晚熟谷子改良新品种选育成功 . 农民日报, 2010 - 04-12(005).
[5] 闫凤岐, 张雅丽, 姚瑞 . 杂交谷子亩产创世界之最. 河北农业科技, 2008(1):56.
[6] 邱风仓 . 光温敏两系杂交谷子的推广及应用. 河北农业科技, 2008(18):8-9.
[7] 唐启义, 冯明光 . 实用统计分析及其DPS数据处理系统.北京: 科学出版社, 2002.
[8] Sprague G F, Tatum L . General versus specific combining ability in single crosses of corn. Journal American Society Agronomy, 1942,34:923-932.
[9] 张天真 . 作物育种学总论(第三版) . 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2011.
[10] 黄远璋, 刘来福 . 作物数量遗传学基础——六、配合力:不完全双列杂交. 遗传, 1980,2(2):43-46.
[11] 廖伏明, 周坤炉, 盛孝邦 , 等. 籼型三系杂交水稻主要农艺性状配合力研究. 作物学报, 1999,2(5):622-631.
[12] 谭美林, 冯明友, 张家洪 , 等. 杂交水稻亲本主要农艺性状配合力及遗传力分析. 贵州农业科学, 2009,37(3):6-8.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-3601.2009.03.002
[13] 何代元, 吴广成, 龙德祥 , 等. 十个玉米自交系主要农艺性状配合力分析. 杂粮作物, 2003(1):26-27.
[14] 李正祥, 孙云, 龚建国 , 等. 玉米雄性不育系主要性状配合力的研究. 宁夏农林科技, 2017,58(4):5-8.
[1] 王小林 纪晓玲 张盼盼 张 雄 张 静. 黄土高原旱地谷子品种地上器官#br# 干物质分配与产量形成相关性分析[J]. 作物杂志, 2018, (5): 150–155
[2] 魏萌涵, 解慧芳, 邢璐, 宋慧, 王淑君, 王素英, 刘海萍, 付楠, 刘金荣. 华北地区谷子产量与农艺性状的综合评价分析[J]. 作物杂志, 2018, (4): 42–47
[3] 王拯,陈兆波,张胜全,任立平,高新欢,叶志杰,张风廷. BS系列杂交小麦在陕西渭南地区制种可行性分析[J]. 作物杂志, 2018, (3): 174–179
[4] 岳茂林,薛蔚荣,张瑞栋,岳忠孝,吕瑞洲,郭鹏燕. 不同行距配置对谷子农艺性状及产量的影响[J]. 作物杂志, 2018, (2): 93–96
[5] 李忠南,王越人,邬生辉,曲海涛,许正学,李光发. 玉米主要性状GCA效应值的因子分析[J]. 作物杂志, 2018, (2): 25–29
[6] 孙冬雪,张爱军. 底施锌肥对谷子抗氧化性及干物质的影响[J]. 作物杂志, 2017, (6): 160–164
[7] 刘丽华,苑少华,冯树英,庞斌双,李宏博,刘阳娜,张立平,赵昌平. 小麦F型雄性不育系和恢复系SSR指纹图谱构建及遗传差异分析[J]. 作物杂志, 2017, (6): 30–36
[8] 郭瑞锋,张永福,任月梅,杨忠. 混合盐碱胁迫对谷子萌发、幼芽生长的影响及耐盐碱品种筛选[J]. 作物杂志, 2017, (4): 63–66
[9] 宋国亮,冯小磊,范光宇,史高雷,李双东,王峰,王晓明,赵治海. 谷子新不育系的配合力分析[J]. 作物杂志, 2017, (2): 44–50
[10] 张晓娟,周福平,张一中,邵强,范昕琦,刘勇,柳青山. 复粒高粱不育系的研究[J]. 作物杂志, 2017, (2): 72–75
[11] 代小冬,朱灿灿,秦娜,杨育峰,王雁楠,杨国红,司冰,刘诗慧,李君霞. 烯效唑和密度对谷子产量及产量相关性状的影响[J]. 作物杂志, 2017, (2): 104–108
[12] 邱双,闫双堆,刘利军. 不同谷子品种耐低磷能力研究[J]. 作物杂志, 2017, (2): 139–144
[13] 赵丽娟,马金丰,李延东,李祥羽,李志江,袁红梅,郭文栋. 60Co-γ射线辐射谷子干种子诱变效应的研究[J]. 作物杂志, 2017, (1): 38–43
[14] 郑英杰,陈广红,王绍林,夏明,阙补超,于亚辉,王莹,李振宇. 海南气候条件对北方粳型水稻两用核不育系繁种的影响[J]. 作物杂志, 2017, (1): 51–55
[15] 穆婷婷,杜慧玲,景小兰,李志华,郭琦,田岗,李会霞,刘璋. 外源硒对谷子产量因子及硒含量的影响[J]. 作物杂志, 2017, (1): 73–78
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] 赵广才,常旭虹,王德梅,陶志强,王艳杰,杨玉双,朱英杰. 小麦生产概况及其发展[J]. 作物杂志, 2018, (4): 1 –7 .
[2] 权宝全,白冬梅,田跃霞,薛云云. 不同源库关系对花生光合特性及产量的影响[J]. 作物杂志, 2018, (4): 102 –105 .
[3] 黄学芳,黄明镜,刘化涛,赵聪,王娟玲. 覆膜穴播条件下降水年型和群体密度对张杂谷5号分蘖成穗及产量的影响[J]. 作物杂志, 2018, (4): 106 –113 .
[4] 黄文辉, 王会, 梅德圣. 农作物抗倒性研究进展[J]. 作物杂志, 2018, (4): 13 –19 .
[5] 赵云,徐彩龙,杨旭,李素真,周静,李继存,韩天富,吴存祥. 不同播种方式对麦茬夏大豆保苗和生产效益的影响[J]. 作物杂志, 2018, (4): 114 –120 .
[6] 陆梅,孙敏,任爱霞,雷妙妙,薛玲珠,高志强. 喷施叶面肥对旱地小麦生长的影响及与产量的关系[J]. 作物杂志, 2018, (4): 121 –125 .
[7] 王晓飞,徐海军,郭梦桥,肖宇,程薪宇,刘淑霞,关向军,吴耀坤,赵伟华,魏国江. 播期、密度及施肥对寒地油用型紫苏产量的影响[J]. 作物杂志, 2018, (4): 126 –130 .
[8] 朱鹏锦,庞新华,梁春,谭秦亮,严霖,周全光,欧克维. 低温胁迫对甘蔗幼苗活性氧代谢和抗氧化酶的影响[J]. 作物杂志, 2018, (4): 131 –137 .
[9] 高杰,李青风,彭秋,焦晓燕,王劲松. 不同养分配比对糯高粱物质生产及氮磷钾利用效率的影响[J]. 作物杂志, 2018, (4): 138 –142 .
[10] 商娜,杨中旭,李秋芝,尹会会,王士红,李海涛,李彤,张晗. 鲁西地区常规棉聊棉6号留叶枝栽培的适宜密度研究[J]. 作物杂志, 2018, (4): 143 –148 .