作物杂志,2022, 第1期: 96–101 doi: 10.16035/j.issn.1001-7283.2022.01.014

• 遗传育种·种质资源·生物技术 • 上一篇    下一篇

贵协3号小麦衍生品种(系)的赤霉病抗性评价及农艺性状分析

葛昌斌1(), 张宏套1, 廖平安1, 曹燕燕1, 黄杰1, 乔冀良1, 郭春强1, 王君1, 秦素研1, 张兰1, 夏明聪2, 程斌3, 张立异3   

  1. 1漯河市农业科学院/漯河市抗赤霉优质小麦种质创制及新品种培育工程技术研究中心,462300,河南漯河
    2河南省农业科学院植物保护研究所,450002,河南郑州
    3贵州省农业科学院旱粮研究所,550006,贵州贵阳
  • 收稿日期:2021-02-22 修回日期:2021-05-21 出版日期:2022-02-15 发布日期:2022-02-16
  • 作者简介:葛昌斌,研究方向为小麦抗病育种,E-mail: gcb78@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    河南省科技攻关计划:小麦远缘杂交创制新种质及新品种选育(162102110026);财政部和农业农村部:国家现代农业产业技术体系(CARS-03);河南省重大科技专项:抗赤霉病优质小麦新品种选育关键技术研究与示范(201300110800)

Evaluation of Resistance to Fusarium Head Blight and Analysis of Agronomic Traits in Guixie 3-Derived Wheat Varieties (Lines)

Ge Changbin1(), Zhang Hongtao1, Liao Ping’an1, Cao Yanyan1, Huang Jie1, Qiao Jiliang1, Guo Chunqiang1, Wang Jun1, Qin Suyan1, Zhang Lan1, Xia Mingcong2, Cheng Bin3, Zhang Liyi3   

  1. 1Luohe Academy of Agricultural Sciences/Luohe Research Center of Scab Resistant and High Quality Wheat Germplasm Creation and New Variety Cultivation Engineering Technology, Luohe 462300, Henan, China
    2Institute of Plant Protection, Henan Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Zhengzhou 450002, Henan, China
    3Institute of Upland Crops, Guizhou Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Guiyang 550006, Guizhou, China
  • Received:2021-02-22 Revised:2021-05-21 Online:2022-02-15 Published:2022-02-16

摘要:

小麦赤霉病是一种对小麦生产危害很强的世界性真菌病害,利用抗赤霉病品种是减轻危害的有效手段之一,但是具有赤霉病抗性的小麦种质很少。本研究鉴定筛选出适合黄淮麦区中抗赤霉病的种质材料漯抗1号、漯抗4号和漯抗6号。3份材料的发病小穗率分别是19.0%、20.9%和20.2%,与苏麦3号(13.8%)差异显著,但与扬麦158(19.2%)差异不显著。从平均严重度和发病小穗率分析,漯抗1号、漯抗4号和漯抗6号的赤霉病抗性为中抗,与扬麦158相当。从耐寒性、株高、千粒重、穗粒数和小穗密度等方面对漯抗1号、漯抗4号和漯抗6号分析表明,漯抗6号与周麦22无显著差异,漯抗6号更适用于黄淮麦区小麦育种。

关键词: 漯抗1号, 漯抗4号, 漯抗6号, 赤霉病, 贵协3号, 小麦衍生品种(系), 抗性评价

Abstract:

Fusarium head blight in wheat is a harmful worldwide fungal disease for wheat production. It is an effective means to reduce the harm by using the scab resistance varieties. But there are few wheat germplasms had the resistance to Fusarium head blight. The research identified three germplasms of Luokang 1, Luokang 4, and Luokang 6 had moderate resistance to Fusarium head blight and were suitable for planting in Huanghuai wheat region, and the proportions of disease spikelets were 19.0%, 20.9% and 20.2%, respectively, which had significant difference with Sumai 3 (13.8%), but had no significant difference with Yangmai 158 (19.2%). By the analyse of the average severity and percentage of diseased spikelet, the three materials had moderate resistance to Fusarium head blight, which were similar to Yangmai 158. From the analyse of cold tolerance, plant height, 1000-grain weight, grains per spike and spikelet density, Luokang 6 had no significant difference with Zhoumai 22, which was more suitable for breeding and utilization in Huanghuai wheat region.

Key words: Luokang 1, Luokang 4, Luokang 6, Fusarium head blight, Guixie 3, Wheat derived varieties (lines), Resistance evaluation

表1

贵协3号衍生品种(系)及对照的赤霉病抗性评价

品种(系)
Variety
(line)
亲本组合
Parental combination
小穗数
Spikelet number
发病小穗数
Number of diseased
spikelets
发病小穗率
Percentage of diseased
spikelet (%)
平均严重度
Average severity
抗性
Resistance
2018 2019 2020 2018 2019 2020 2018 2019 2020 平均
Average
2018 2019 2020 2018 2019 2020
周麦22
Zhoumai 22
周麦12/温麦6号//
周麦13号
23.2
24.0
25.5
18.6
18.2
19.5
80.3
75.7
76.5
77.5
4.0
3.8
3.9
S
S
S
贵协3号
Guixie 3
以色列野生二粒
小麦/光稃野燕麦
25.7
26.3
28.2
5.4
5.2
5.2
21.2
19.8
18.6
19.9bB
2.3
2.0
1.9
MR
MR
R
苏麦3号
Sumai 3
阿夫/台湾小麦
19.0
18.3
18.0
2.7
2.9
2.1
14.3
15.7
11.5
13.8aA
1.5
1.7
1.3
R
R
R
扬麦158
Yangmai 158
扬麦4号//
ST1472/506
19.6
18.2
18.5
4.0
3.6
3.2
20.6
19.7
17.3
19.2bAB
2.4
2.0
2.0
MR
MR
MR
扬麦13
Yangmai 13
扬84-84//Maristorve/
扬麦3号
19.3
18.1
19.0
9.1
7.5
8.6
47.4
41.6
45.2
44.7cC
3.4
3.0
3.0
MS
MS
MS
安农8455
Annong 8455
不详
18.4
18.0
18.7
15.7
15.8
16.3
85.4
88.0
87.1
86.8dD
3.7
4.0
3.9
S
S
S
漯抗1号
Luokang 1
新麦9号/贵协3号
22.1
21.4
21.5
4.4
3.9
4.1
19.7
18.4
19.0
19.0bAB
2.2
2.1
2.0
MR
MR
MR
LK1601 矮抗58/漯抗1号 22.7 23.5 22.1 16.3 18.4 16.7 71.7 78.5 75.4 75.2 3.8 3.9 3.7 S S S
LK1602 21.6 22.8 23.0 14.8 18.2 15.8 68.3 80.0 68.7 72.3 3.8 4.0 3.9 S S S
LK1603 22.3 22.7 23.6 17.5 14.6 14.8 78.3 64.1 62.6 68.3 3.6 3.7 3.5 S S S
LK1604 23.5 23.0 22.4 20.0 16.0 16.7 85.0 69.4 74.4 76.3 4.0 3.7 3.6 S S S
LK1605 21.0 22.5 21.9 16.4 16.6 15.7 78.3 73.7 71.8 74.6 3.8 3.8 3.6 S S S
LK1606 23.3 23.5 24.0 18.3 18.8 18.0 78.5 80.0 75.0 77.8 3.7 4.0 3.6 S S S
LK1607(漯抗4号)
LK1607 (Luokang 4)
24.0
23.2
24.5
4.9
4.7
5.3
20.5
20.3
21.8
20.9bB
2.5
2.2
2.4
MR
MR
MR
LK1608(漯麦53)
LK1608 (Luomai 53)
23.6
24.0
23.1
9.1
11.1
9.9
38.5
46.1
43.0
42.5cC
2.8
3.4
3.1
MR
MS
MS
LK1609 22.4 23.0 22.8 8.0 18.0 13.7 35.7 78.4 60.2 58.1 2.2 3.9 3.3 MR S MS
LK1610 21.3 22.5 21.7 13.8 17.5 12.9 65.0 77.6 59.5 67.4 3.3 3.9 3.3 MS S MS
LK1611 21.5 21.7 22.0 10.5 16.9 14.9 49.0 78.0 67.9 65.0 3.3 4.0 3.6 MS S S
LK1612 22.8 23.6 23.0 11.0 16.0 11.5 48.3 67.9 50.0 55.4 3.1 3.9 3.2 MS S MS
LK1613 24.6 23.7 24.0 9.8 15.4 14.2 40.0 65.0 59.0 54.7 2.7 3.7 3.0 MR S MS
LK1614 23.0 22.4 21.5 18.0 16.1 12.3 78.3 71.8 57.0 69.0 3.8 3.6 3.0 S S MS
LK1615 25.1 24.7 24.3 19.7 19.3 17.1 78.3 78.1 70.5 75.6 3.8 3.8 3.6 S S S
LK1616 周麦22/漯抗1号 22.0 21.9 22.3 14.3 17.5 11.3 65.0 80.0 50.8 65.3 3.7 3.9 3.2 S S MS
LK1617 25.3 34.6 25.0 16.4 27.7 18.7 65.0 80.0 74.9 73.3 3.9 4.0 3.5 S S S
LK1618 21.4 22.0 21.5 16.1 17.6 12.1 75.0 80.0 56.2 70.4 3.6 4.0 3.3 S S MS
LK1619 20.0 19.4 19.5 9.0 13.5 13.5 45.0 69.7 69.3 61.3 3.0 3.6 3.4 MS S MS
LK1620 21.2 21.0 20.8 15.2 15.0 14.3 71.7 71.4 68.6 70.6 3.6 3.7 3.2 S S MS
LK1621 25.0 24.3 24.6 12.1 19.0 12.9 48.3 78.1 52.4 59.6 3.4 3.6 3.4 MS S MS
LK1622 21.8 22.0 22.7 10.3 11.0 17.5 47.2 50.0 77.3 58.2 3.4 3.1 3.7 MS MS S
LK1623 18.7 19.6 20.1 8.4 15.7 15.3 45.0 80.0 76.0 67.0 3.4 3.9 3.6 MS S S
LK1624 21.6 22.1 21.3 10.4 17.7 11.0 48.0 80.0 51.7 59.9 3.3 4.0 3.2 MS S MS
LK1625 23.5 23.0 24.2 12.1 18.4 11.4 51.7 80.0 47.0 59.6 3.0 4.0 3.0 MS S MS
LK1626 22.7 22.5 23.1 10.5 17.4 9.4 46.1 77.4 40.6 54.7 3.3 4.0 2.7 MS S MR
LK1627 22.0 23.5 24.0 13.6 18.6 8.5 61.7 79.3 35.5 58.8 3.9 4.0 2.7 S S MR
LK1628 21.2 20.5 21.9 9.1 16.2 11.1 42.7 78.9 50.6 57.4 3.3 4.0 3.4 MS S MS
LK1629 22.4 23.0 22.6 15.3 17.6 10.1 68.3 76.4 44.8 63.2 3.6 3.9 3.1 S S MS
LK1630(漯抗6号)
LK1630 (Luokang 6)
26.4
25.6
25.3
5.4
5.6
4.6
20.4
21.9
18.2
20.2bB
2.0
2.1
2.3
MR
MR
MR
LK1631 23.4 22.7 23.0 9.8 17.9 9.0 41.7 79.0 39.1 53.3 2.9 4.0 2.8 MR S MR
LK1632 22.7 22.1 22.5 10.3 17.2 9.0 45.2 77.8 40.0 54.3 3.1 4.0 2.6 MR S MR
LK1633 23.0 23.3 23.2 15.7 17.0 9.7 68.3 73.1 41.7 61.0 3.7 3.7 2.7 S S MR
LK1634 21.3 20.8 21.0 9.6 16.6 10.5 45.0 80.0 50.2 58.4 3.2 4.0 3.4 MS S MS
LK1635 22.1 23.0 22.5 15.8 17.0 15.7 71.7 73.7 69.6 71.7 3.9 3.7 3.5 S S S
LK1636 20.5 21.0 20.6 9.9 8.7 9.2 48.1 41.5 44.7 44.8cC 3.4 3.4 3.0 MS MS MS
LK1637 23.2 23.5 22.8 10.6 18.8 11.0 45.5 80.0 48.4 58.0 3.4 4.0 3.1 MS S MS
LK1638 22.0 21.5 21.8 10.1 15.8 8.3 46.0 73.3 38.2 52.5 3.4 4.0 2.9 MS S MR
LK1639 21.5 22.0 21.3 10.1 16.5 7.8 47.2 74.8 36.8 52.9 3.0 3.9 2.9 MS S MR
LK1640 23.2 23.5 23.0 11.2 18.2 18.2 48.1 77.5 79.0 68.2 3.1 3.9 3.6 MS S S
LK1641 21.8 22.0 21.7 10.2 16.9 9.1 47.0 76.7 41.9 55.2 3.6 3.9 2.4 S S MR

图1

抗病品种(系)和对照品种对赤霉病的反应 1:漯抗1号;2:漯抗4号;3:漯抗6号;4:苏麦3号;5:扬麦158;6:扬麦13;7:安农8455

图2

喷雾接种抗病品种(系)对赤霉病的抗性表现

表2

亲本贵协3号、中抗衍生品种、周麦22及抗病对照的主要农艺性状

品种(系)
Variety (line)
分蘖数
Tillering
number
耐寒性
Cold
tolerance
株高
Plant height
(cm)
千粒重
1000-grain
weight (g)
穗粒数
Grains
per spike
穗长
Spike length
(cm)
小穗密度(个/cm)
Spikelet density
(spikelet/cm)
粒色
Seed
color
贵协3号Guixie 3 4.8 3级 128.5 39.0 55.0 16.5 1.7dC
周麦22 Zhoumai 22 5.6 1级 80.0 46.0 43.5 11.0 2.3aA
漯抗1号Luokang 1 5.0 2级 82.5 40.5 42.8 11.3 1.9cdBC
漯抗4号Luokang 4 5.3 1级 79.5 44.5 42.0 12.5 2.0bAB
漯抗6号Luokang 6 5.1 1级 80.0 45.0 43.0 12.0 2.1abAB
苏麦3号Sumai 3 4.5 3级 125.3 38.5 49.5 10.0 1.8dC
扬麦158 Yangmai 158 4.6 3级 100.0 43.5 43.5 10.5 1.8dC
[1] Buerstmayr H, Ban T, Anderson J A. QTL mapping and marker-assisted selection for Fusarium head blight resistance in wheat:a review. Plant Breeding, 2009, 128:1-26.
doi: 10.1111/pbr.2009.128.issue-1
[2] 张爱民, 阳文龙, 李欣, 等. 小麦抗赤霉病研究现状与展望. 遗传, 2018, 40(10):858-873.
[3] 金艳, 刘付锁, 朱统泉, 等. 河南省小麦赤霉病的发生情况分析与防治对策. 河南科技学院学报, 2016, 44(6):1-4.
[4] Osman M, He X, Benedettelli S, et al. Identification of new sources of resistance to fungal leaf and head blight diseases of wheat. European Journal of Plant Pathology, 2016, 145:305-320.
doi: 10.1007/s10658-015-0843-0
[5] 张晓军, 张树伟, 肖进, 等. 小偃麦衍生品系的赤霉病抗性评价. 作物学报, 2020, 46(1):62-73.
[6] 张宏军, 宿振起, 柏贵华, 等. 利用Fhb1基因功能标记选择提高黄淮冬麦区小麦品种对赤霉病的抗性. 作物学报, 2018, 44(4):505-511.
[7] 赵虹, 王西成, 胡卫国, 等. 黄淮南片麦区小麦品种利用现状及建议. 河南农业科学, 2016, 45(8):18-24,38.
[8] 朱展望, 徐登安, 程顺和, 等. 中国小麦品种抗赤霉病基因Fhb1的鉴定与溯源. 作物学报, 2018, 44(4):473-482.
[9] Somers D J, Fedak G, Savard M. Molecular mapping of novel genes controlling Fusarium head blight resistance and deoxynivalenol accumulation in spring wheat. Genome, 2003, 46(4):555-564.
pmid: 12897863
[10] Kollers S, Rodemann B, Ling J, et al. Whole genome association mapping of Fusarium head blight resistance in European winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). PLoS ONE, 2013, 8(2):e57500.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0057500
[11] 胡文静, 张春梅, 吴迪, 等. 长江中下游小麦抗赤霉病品种的筛选与部分农艺性状分析. 中国农业科学, 2020, 53(21):4313-4321.
[12] 中华人民共和国农业部. 小麦区域试验品种抗赤霉病鉴定技术规程:NY/T 2954-2016. 北京:中国农业出版社: 中国农业出版社.
[13] 程顺和, 张勇, 张伯桥, 等. 小麦抗赤霉病育种2条技术路线的探讨. 扬州大学学报(农业与生命科学版), 2003, 24(1):59-62.
[14] Hajjar R, Hodgkin T. The use of wild relativies in crop improvement:A survery of developments over the last 20 years. Euphytica, 2007, 156:1-13.
doi: 10.1007/s10681-007-9363-0
[15] 肖松, 陈天青, 高旭, 等. 贵协3号对小麦赤霉病、条锈病及白粉病的抗病性. 贵州农业科学, 2016, 44(6):56-59.
[16] 张彬, 李金秀, 王震, 等. 黄淮南片麦区主栽小麦品种对赤霉病抗性分析. 植物保护, 2018, 44(2):190-194.
[17] 苏双飞, 许峰, 张从宇, 等. 145份小麦品种(系)的赤霉病抗性评价. 安徽科技学院学报, 2015, 29(2):13-19.
[18] 陆成彬, 范金平, 印娟, 等. 小麦主要农艺性状对赤霉病抗性的影响. 安徽农业科学, 2013, 41(3):1091-1092,1095.
[1] 黄莉群, 马玥, 戚新蕾, 孙秋玉, 董佳玉, 李冠甲, 马占鸿. 玉米品种对不同地区玉米南方锈菌的抗性评价[J]. 作物杂志, 2021, (6): 205–210
[2] 高清, 张亚玲, 周弋力, 于连鹏, 聂强, 靳学慧. 黑龙江省粳稻品种稻瘟病主效抗性基因鉴定与抗性评价[J]. 作物杂志, 2021, (4): 59–66
[3] 缪建锟, 徐晗, 杨皓, 闫晗, 褚晋, 白元俊, 董海. 辽宁省水稻主栽品种稻曲病抗性鉴定与评价[J]. 作物杂志, 2020, (6): 38–46
[4] 刘东军, 宋维富, 杨雪峰, 赵丽娟, 宋庆杰, 张春利, 辛文利, 肖志敏. 小麦Fhb1基因定位、克隆及其在抗赤霉病育种中利用的研究进展[J]. 作物杂志, 2020, (4): 16–20
[5] 王志伟, 王志龙, 乔祥梅, 杨金华, 程加省, 程耿, 于亚雄. 云南小麦品种(系)锈病和赤霉病抗性功能基因的KASP标记检测[J]. 作物杂志, 2020, (1): 187–193
[6] 张雪娇,石晶晶,常娜,张雅琴,齐永志,甄文超,尹宝重. 河北省冬小麦赤霉病拮抗细菌的分离与鉴定[J]. 作物杂志, 2017, (2): 157–162
[7] 何震天, 陈秀兰, 张容, 等. 扬辐麦4号的选育与栽培技术[J]. 作物杂志, 2010, (2): 109–110
[8] 裴自友, 温辉芹, 王晋. 小麦镰刀菌毒素DON积累抗性研究进展[J]. 作物杂志, 2008, (4): 5–8
[9] 邓贺明, 胡亚敏, 冯家春, 等. 国审小麦新品种“阜麦936”的选育及栽培技术[J]. 作物杂志, 2006, (2): 21–21
[10] 王晓鸣. 玉米病虫害知识系列讲座(Ⅲ) 玉米抗病虫性鉴定与调查技术[J]. 作物杂志, 2005, (6): 53–55
[11] 冯刚, 徐迅一, 姜宪琪, 等. 暖冬气候对小麦生育的影响及对策[J]. 作物杂志, 1999, (6): 21–22
[12] 王世刚. 一麦两玉米两蔬菜模式栽培技术[J]. 作物杂志, 1997, (3): 21–21
[13] 杨崇力, 赵玲瑛. 小麦赤霉病抗性与农艺性状的相关性[J]. 作物杂志, 1996, (1): 33–34
[14] 蒋国樑, 吴兆苏. 小麦品种对赤霉病抗扩展性遗传的动态分析[J]. 作物杂志, 1989, (3): 15–16
[15] 祁适雨. 春小麦龙麦12[J]. 作物杂志, 1988, (2): 15–15
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!