检索
E-mail
RSS
高级检索 图表检索

当期目录 我要投稿 过刊浏览
高级检索 图表检索

作物杂志,2022, 第4期: 90–98 doi: 10.16035/j.issn.1001-7283.2022.04.013

• 生理生化·植物营养·栽培耕作 • 上一篇    下一篇

玉米杂交种及其亲本苗期性状对低氮胁迫的动态响应

徐世英(), 王宁, 程皓, 冯万军()   

  1. 山西农业大学农学院/黄土高原特色作物优质高效生产省部共建协同创新中心,030801,山西晋中
  • 收稿日期:2021-09-05 修回日期:2022-03-01 出版日期:2022-08-15 发布日期:2022-08-22
  • 通讯作者: 冯万军
  • 作者简介:徐世英,主要从事作物学研究,E-mail： 605824435@qq.com
  • 基金资助:
    黄土高原特色作物优质高效生产省部共建协同创新中心自主研发项目(SBGJXTZX);山西农业大学生物育种工程(YZGC090)

Dynamic Changes of Seedling Traits among Maize Hybrids and Their Parents in Response to Low Nitrogen Stress

Xu Shiying(), Wang Ning, Cheng Hao, Feng Wanjun()   

  1. College of Agriculture, Shanxi Agricultural University/Ministerial and Provincial Co-Innovation Center for Endemic Crops Production with High-Quality and Efficiency in Loess Plateau, Jinzhong 030801, Shanxi, China
  • Received:2021-09-05 Revised:2022-03-01 Online:2022-08-15 Published:2022-08-22
  • Contact: Feng Wanjun

RichHTML

3

PDF (PC)

191

摘要：

以玉米杂交种先玉335及其亲本（PH6WC、PH4CV）和豫玉22及其亲本（综3、87-1）为试验材料,通过水培方法,设置低氮（0.04mmol/L,LN）和正常氮素（2mmol/L,CK）水平2个处理,分别在培养3、7和14d后,对其幼苗生物量积累、叶片和根系表型、叶绿素及氮素含量等进行分析,探究低氮胁迫下玉米杂交种及其亲本幼苗性状的动态变化。结果表明,玉米苗期根系对低氮的响应要早于地上部,且杂交种对低氮的响应比亲本更为迅速。在CK和LN处理下,杂交种幼苗的多个性状均存在中亲和超亲优势,豫玉22的根尖数、根系氮积累量占比和先玉335的总根长、根表面积及根尖数的杂种优势在3个时间点与CK处理相比均有较大幅度提高。通过耐低氮指数分析发现,杂交种的耐低氮能力介于2个亲本之间或与其中1个亲本接近。

关键词: 玉米, 幼苗性状, 杂种优势, 低氮胁迫

Abstract:

Maize hybrid Xianyu 335 and its parental inbred lines (PH6WC, PH4CV), and Yuyu 22 and its parental inbred lines (Zong 3, 87-1) were selected as experimental materials. Two nitrogen level treatments were carried out by hydroponics, including low nitrogen (0.04mmol/L, LN) and normal nitrogen (2mmol/L, CK) levels. After three, seven and fourteen days of culture, the biomass accumulation, leaf and root phenotype, leaf chlorophyll content and nitrogen content were analyzed in order to explore the dynamic changes of seedling traits among maize hybrids and their parents under low nitrogen stress. The results showed that the response of root to low nitrogen was earlier than that of shoot, and the response of hybrids to low nitrogen was faster than those of their parents. Under CK and LN treatments, most traits of hybrid seedlings showed heterosis. The heterosis of the root tip number and nitrogen accumulation in roots of Yuyu 22, and total root length, root surface area and root tip number of Xianyu 335 were significantly increased at three time points compared with control. Based on the low nitrogen tolerance index analysis, it was found that the low nitrogen tolerance of the hybrid was between or close to one of the two parents.

Key words: Maize, Seedling traits, Heterosis, Low nitrogen stress

图1

2个氮素水平下玉米杂交种及其亲本幼苗叶片（a）和根系（b）形态的动态变化

表1

2个氮素水平下不同培养时间玉米杂交种及其亲本幼苗性状的方差分析

性状
Trait		 F值F-value
FT FN FG FT×FN FT×FG FN×FG FT×FN×FG
第1叶叶面积
Leaf area of the first leaf (LA1, cm2)		 44.42** 58.85** 156.51** 33.06** 28.35** 18.18** 8.74**
第2叶叶面积
Leaf area of the second leaf (LA2, cm2)		 14.62** 67.99** 253.24** 29.21** 17.34** 10.71** 8.29**
第1叶SPAD值
SPAD value of the first leaf (SPAD1)		 2038.76** 3138.03** 154.21** 1514.78** 7.93** 19.70** 12.63**
第2叶SPAD值
SPAD value of the second leaf (SPAD2)		 478.90** 1723.28** 119.60** 831.86** 38.53** 36.32** 19.48**
总根长Total root length (TRL, cm) 743.42** 10.90** 421.19** 16.28** 45.17** 12.05** 2.14*
根表面积Root surface area (RSA, cm²) 503.00** 2.36ns 291.96** 14.88** 35.22** 5.15** 2.26*
根平均直径
Root average diameter (RAD, mm)		 73.38** 7.13** 60.68** 1.42ns 9.29** 6.79** 0.79ns
根体积Root volume (RV, cm³) 293.09** 1.49ns 167.41** 13.08** 29.25** 8.38** 5.41**
根尖数Root tips number (RTN) 369.20** 135.73** 249.27** 75.93** 38.73** 26.49** 9.29**
地上部干重Shoot dry weight (SDW, g) 1494.48** 400.32** 474.73** 280.02** 90.10** 45.84** 37.92**
根干重Root dry weight (RDW, g) 1005.89** 67.86** 579.53** 14.15** 84.29** 11.90** 7.74**
根冠比Root to shoot ratio (R/S) 74.08** 488.04** 45.00** 153.19** 7.89** 8.46** 10.55**
地上部氮积累量
Shoot nitrogen accumulation (SNA, mg)		 3635.57** 3082.75** 652.51** 1621.36** 268.58** 219.10* 144.24**
根系氮积累量
Root nitrogen accumulation (RNA, mg)		 699.37** 1216.75** 1120.20** 426.29** 169.36** 96.93** 92.88**
单株氮积累量
Total nitrogen accumulation per plant (TNA, mg)		 4184.98** 3673.90** 866.98** 1889.13** 308.23** 248.11** 171.91**
地上部氮积累量占比SNA/TNA (%) 918.69** 89.92** 22.03** 70.82** 124.33** 228.96** 38.91**
根系氮积累量占比RNA/TNA (%) 918.69** 89.92** 22.03** 70.82** 124.33** 228.96** 38.91**

图2

2个氮素水平处理不同天数后玉米幼苗各性状中亲（a）和超亲（b）优势的聚类

表2

不同培养时间玉米杂交种及其亲本幼苗耐低氮指数

处理时间
Treatment
time (d)		 基因型
Genotype		 指标Index
LA1 LA2 SPAD1 SPAD2 TRL RSA RAD RV RTN SDW RDW R/S SNA RNA TNA SNA/TNA RNA/TNA AVG SD CV(%)
3 PH6WC 1.10 0.93 1.00 1.00 0.73 0.88 1.16 1.06 0.68 0.87 1.13 1.21 0.44 1.24 0.56 0.78 2.21 1.00 0.39 38.7
XY335 1.05 0.98 0.96 0.93 0.86 1.01 1.12 1.05 0.83 0.94 1.18 1.32 0.77 0.97 0.79 0.97 1.22 1.00 0.15 15.1
PH4CV 1.05 1.08 0.89 0.86 0.89 0.89 1.02 0.89 0.75 0.99 1.02 1.00 1.12 0.90 1.08 1.04 0.83 0.96 0.10 10.8
Z3 0.83 0.86 0.93 0.89 1.02 1.05 0.92 1.02 0.59 0.79 0.93 0.80 0.91 0.48 0.76 1.19 0.63 0.86 0.18 20.6
YY22 1.04 0.97 1.01 1.01 1.04 0.77 0.91 0.52 1.37 0.99 1.05 1.07 1.17 1.27 1.20 0.98 1.06 1.03 0.19 18.5
87-1 0.98 0.94 1.01 1.01 1.41 1.21 1.00 1.65 1.13 1.12 0.83 0.74 1.10 0.73 1.01 1.10 0.72 1.04 0.24 22.9
AVG 1.01 0.96 0.97 0.95 0.99 0.97 1.02 1.03 0.89 0.95 1.02 1.02 0.92 0.93 0.90 1.01 1.11 0.98 0.06 6.0
SD 0.09 0.07 0.05 0.07 0.23 0.16 0.10 0.36 0.30 0.11 0.13 0.23 0.28 0.30 0.24 0.14 0.58
CV(%) 9.30 7.50 5.20 7.00 23.60 16.00 10.00 35.40 33.50 12.00 12.70 22.20 30.30 32.40 26.40 13.90 52.00
7 PH6WC 0.94 0.96 0.77 0.79 0.69 0.80 1.16 0.88 0.64 0.66 0.84 1.66 0.36 0.64 0.39 0.92 1.64 0.87 0.35 40.9
XY335 1.02 0.98 0.66 0.77 1.05 1.25 1.22 1.90 0.78 0.87 1.25 1.56 0.39 0.88 0.44 0.89 2.01 1.05 0.45 42.5
PH4CV 0.98 0.99 0.71 0.74 1.11 1.12 1.06 1.19 0.70 0.82 1.54 1.78 0.52 1.07 0.57 0.90 1.87 1.04 0.39 37.3
Z3 0.91 0.91 0.82 0.95 1.44 1.47 1.02 1.40 0.67 0.84 1.02 1.06 0.82 0.22 0.62 1.32 0.36 0.93 0.35 37.8
YY22 0.86 0.88 0.72 0.79 1.07 0.99 0.97 0.98 1.23 1.08 1.18 1.09 0.67 0.67 0.67 1.00 1.01 0.93 0.18 19.2
87-1 0.86 1.07 0.98 0.92 1.97 1.60 0.99 1.68 1.42 1.05 1.32 2.10 0.90 0.81 0.89 1.02 0.92 1.21 0.41 33.6
AVG 0.93 0.97 0.78 0.83 1.22 1.21 1.07 1.34 0.91 0.89 1.19 1.54 0.61 0.72 0.60 1.01 1.30 1.01 0.27 26.3
SD 0.06 0.07 0.12 0.09 0.44 0.30 0.10 0.40 0.33 0.16 0.24 0.40 0.22 0.29 0.18 0.16 0.64
CV(%) 7.00 6.90 14.90 10.40 35.80 24.80 9.30 29.80 36.70 17.50 20.30 26.20 36.70 40.30 30.00 16.30 49.50
14 PH6WC 0.56 0.29 0.00 0.00 0.58 0.70 1.20 0.88 0.32 0.47 1.01 2.58 0.23 0.58 0.26 0.89 2.28 0.75 0.72 94.9
XY335 1.21 0.23 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 1.02 1.05 0.53 0.40 1.07 2.57 0.17 0.61 0.21 0.83 2.98 0.88 0.82 94.0
PH4CV 1.15 1.02 0.00 0.00 0.94 1.13 1.13 1.37 0.79 0.57 1.17 2.41 0.27 0.88 0.32 0.85 2.77 0.99 0.73 74.3
Z3 0.44 0.72 0.00 0.46 0.74 0.64 0.98 0.65 0.48 0.46 0.82 2.08 0.31 0.24 0.31 1.01 0.78 0.65 0.45 69.5
YY22 0.52 0.89 0.00 0.34 0.97 0.90 0.98 0.99 0.96 0.60 1.29 2.06 0.27 0.32 0.27 0.99 1.17 0.80 0.49 62.1
87-1 0.65 1.04 0.00 0.43 0.89 0.83 0.96 0.82 0.52 0.97 1.65 1.70 0.59 0.43 0.58 1.02 0.75 0.81 0.42 51.5
AVG 0.75 0.70 0.00 0.21 0.85 0.87 1.05 0.96 0.60 0.58 1.17 2.23 0.31 0.51 0.32 0.93 1.79 0.81 0.55 68.1
SD 0.34 0.36 0.00 0.23 0.16 0.18 0.10 0.24 0.23 0.21 0.28 0.35 0.15 0.23 0.13 0.09 1.01
CV 44.7 50.9 0.00 111.10 19.00 21.2 9.3 25.5 38.7 35.7 24.3 15.6 47.8 45.3 40.3 9.1 56.5
总体
Total		 AVG 0.90 0.87 0.58 0.66 1.02 1.01 1.05 1.11 0.80 0.80 1.13 1.60 0.61 0.72 0.61 0.98 1.40
SD 0.22 0.24 0.44 0.36 0.32 0.26 0.10 0.36 0.31 0.23 0.23 0.60 0.33 0.31 0.30 0.13 0.78
CV(%) 24.70 27.20 75.00 54.80 31.70 25.20 9.10 32.70 39.00 28.10 20.20 37.40 54.30 43.50 49.20 13.30 55.60

表3

不同性状耐低氮指数的相关性分析

指标Index LA1 LA2 SPAD1 SPAD2 TRL RSA RAD RV RTN SDW RDW R/S SNA RNA TNA SNA/TNA RNA/TNA
LA1
LA2 0.30
SPAD1 0.30 0.26
SPAD2 0.20 0.21 0.96**
TRL 0.02 0.18 0.32 0.35
RSA 0.26 0.31 0.24 0.22 0.77**
RAD 0.40 0.09 -0.15 -0.20 -0.35 0.13
RV 0.36 0.24 0.22 0.19 0.60** 0.92** 0.40
RTN 0.25 0.43* 0.54* 0.48* 0.57* 0.44* -0.21 0.36
SDW 0.10 0.53* 0.70** 0.70** 0.48* 0.29 -0.30 0.18 0.67**
RDW 0.07 0.49* -0.19 -0.22 0.28 0.32 -0.02 0.27 0.34 0.23
R/S -0.12 -0.12 -0.72** -0.79** -0.30 -0.17 0.30 -0.06 -0.29 -0.64** 0.29
SNA 0.07 0.43* 0.81** 0.82** 0.47* 0.25 -0.48* 0.05 0.49* 0.81** -0.08 -0.81**
RNA 0.70** 0.52* 0.53* 0.39 0.04 0.09 0.27 0.19 0.51* 0.42 0.26 -0.18 0.32
TNA 0.16 0.52* 0.82** 0.81** 0.45* 0.26 -0.42 0.08 0.58** 0.86** 0.01 -0.75** 0.98** 0.43*
SNA/TNA -0.49* 0.11 0.31 0.42 0.43* 0.21 -0.63** -0.05 0.12 0.45* -0.23 -0.58** 0.68** -0.43* 0.60**
RNA/TNA 0.50* -0.08 -0.35 -0.50 -0.38 -0.13 0.66** 0.10 -0.07 -0.46* 0.24 0.64** -0.69** 0.42 -0.60** -0.97**
[1] George H S. The composition of a field of maize. Journal of Heredity, 1908, 4(1):296-301.
[2] Birchler J A, Auger D L, Riddle N C. In search of the molecular basis of heterosis. Plant Cell, 2003, 15(10):2236-2239.
pmid: 14523245
[3] Hochholdinger F, Hoecker N. Towards the molecular basis of heterosis. Trends in Plant Science, 2007, 12(9):427-432.
pmid: 17720610
[4] Suresh K S, Renu K. Physiological,biochemical,and genetic basis of heterosis. Advances in Agronomy, 1975, 27:123-174.
[5] Tollenaar M A, Ahmadzadeh E A. Physiological basis of heterosis for grain yield in maize. Crop Science, 2004, 44(6):2086-2094.
doi: 10.2135/cropsci2004.2086
[6] Tollenaar M A, Lee E A. Dissection of physiological processes underlying grain yield in maize by examining genetic improvement and heterosis. Maydica, 2006, 51(2):399-408.
[7] Wang F H. Embryological development of inbred and hybrid Zea mays L.. American Journal of Botany, 1947, 34(3):113-125.
doi: 10.1002/j.1537-2197.1947.tb12966.x
[8] Meyer S, Pospisil H, Scholten S. Heterosis associated gene expression in maize embryos 6 days after fertilization exhibits additive,dominant and overdominant pattern. Plant Molecular Biology, 2007, 63(3):381-391.
doi: 10.1007/s11103-006-9095-x
[9] Hoecker N, Keller B, Piepho H P, et al. Manifestation of heterosis during early maize (Zea mays L.) root development. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 2006, 112(3):421-429.
pmid: 16362278
[10] Hoecker N, Keller B, Muthreich N, et al. Comparison of maize (Zea mays L.) F1-hybrid and parental inbred line primary root transcriptomes suggests organ-specific patterns of nonadditive gene expression and conserved expression trends. Genetics, 2008, 179(3):1275-1283.
doi: 10.1534/genetics.108.088278 pmid: 18562640
[11] Paschold A, Marcon C, Hoecker N, et al. Molecular dissection of heterosis manifestation during early maize root development. Theoretical and Applied Genetics, 2010, 120(2):383-388.
doi: 10.1007/s00122-009-1082-6 pmid: 19526205
[12] Springer N M, Stupar R M. Allelic variation and heterosis in maize:how do two halves make more than a whole?. Genome Research, 2007, 17(3):264-275.
[13] Araus J L, Sanchez C, Cabrera-Bosquet L. Is heterosis in maize mediated through better water use?. New Phytologist, 2010, 187(2):392-406.
doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8137.2010.03276.x pmid: 20456048
[14] Liu W D, Tollenaar M. Response of yield heterosis to increasing plant density in maize. Crop Science, 2009, 49(5):1807-1816.
doi: 10.2135/cropsci2008.07.0422
[15] 李潮海, 尹飞, 王群. 不同耐旱性玉米杂交种及其亲本叶片活性氧代谢对水分胁迫的响应. 生态学报, 2006(6):1912-1919.
[16] 唐连顺, 李广敏. 干旱对玉米杂交种及其亲本自交系幼苗膜脂过氧化及其保护酶活性的影响. 作物学报, 1995(4):509-512.
[17] 马建华, 孙毅, 王玉国, 等. 低磷胁迫对玉米自交系及其杂交种苗期生理特性的影响. 山西农业科学, 2014, 42(3):220-222.
[18] 陈范骏, 米国华, 春亮, 等. 玉米氮效率的杂种优势分析. 作物学报, 2004(10):1014-1018.
[19] Wang Z, Ma B L, Yu X, et al. Physiological basis of heterosis for nitrogen use efficiency of maize. Scientific Reports, 2019, 9(1):18708.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-54864-x
[20] Duvick D N. Genetic progress in yield of United States maize (Zea mays L.). Maydica, 2005, 50(3):193-202.
[21] Han M, Okamoto M, Beatty P H, et al. The genetics of nitrogen use efficiency in crop plants. Annual Review of Genetics, 2015, 49:269-289.
doi: 10.1146/annurev-genet-112414-055037
[22] Good A G, Beatty P H. Fertilizing nature:A tragedy of excess in the commons. Working Papers, 2011, 9(8):e1001124.
[23] Mulvaney R L, Khan S A, Ellsworth T R. Synthetic nitrogen fertilizers deplete soil nitrogen:a global dilemma for sustainable cereal production. Journal of Environmental Quality, 2009, 38(6):2295-2314.
doi: 10.2134/jeq2008.0527 pmid: 19875786
[24] Li H, Hu B, Chu C. Nitrogen use efficiency in crops:lessons from Arabidopsis and rice. Journal of Experimental Botany, 2017, 68(10):2477-2488.
doi: 10.1093/jxb/erx101
[25] 赵泽群, 师赵康, 王雯, 等. 低氮胁迫下玉米幼苗氮素和蔗糖分配特性. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2020, 26(4):783-796.
[26] 冯万军, 张义荣, 姚颖垠, 等. 玉米杂交种与亲本苗期根系蛋白差异表达谱分析. 自然科学进展, 2009, 19(6):619-627.
[27] 薛玲珠, 孙敏, 高志强, 等. 深松蓄水增量播种对旱地小麦植株氮素吸收利用、产量及蛋白质含量的影响. 中国农业科学, 2017, 50(13):2451-2462.
[28] 胡成梅, 连盈, 程鹏飞, 等. 小麦苗期性状与耐低氮性的遗传相关分析. 中国农业大学学报, 2020, 25(4):11-22.
[29] Li H, Sun Y, Yu X, et al. Effects of exogenous calcium on the growth and physiological traits of garlic seedlings under cadmium stress. Journal of Animal and Plant Sciences, 2015, 25(3):107-113.
[30] Procházková D, Sairam R K, Lekshmy S, et al. Differential response of maize hybrid and its parental lines to salinity stress. Czech Journal of Genetics and Plant Breeding, 2013, 54:9-15.
doi: 10.17221/30/2017-CJGPB
[31] Betrán F J, Beck D, Bänziger M, et al. Secondary traits in parental inbreds and hybrids under stress and non-stress environments in tropical maize. Field Crops Research, 2003, 83(1):51-65.
doi: 10.1016/S0378-4290(03)00061-3
[32] Sabermanesh K, Holtham L R, George J, et al. Transition from a maternal to external nitrogen source in maize seedlings. Journal of Integrative Plant Biology, 2017, 59(4):261-274.
doi: 10.1111/jipb.12525
[33] Li P, Zhuang Z, Cai H, et al. Use of genotype-environment interactions to elucidate the pattern of maize root plasticity to nitrogen deficiency. Journal of Integrative Plant Biology, 2016, 58(3):242-253.
doi: 10.1111/jipb.12384
[34] Chun L, Mi G, Li J, et al. Genetic analysis of maize root characteristics in response to low nitrogen stress. Plant and Soil, 2005, 276(1-2):369-382.
doi: 10.1007/s11104-005-5876-2
[35] Liu J, Li J, Chen F, et al. Mapping QTLs for root traits under different nitrate levels at the seedling stage in maize (Zea mays L.). 2008, 305(1):253-265.
[36] Zhan A, Lynch J P. Reduced frequency of lateral root branching improves N capture from low-N soils in maize. Journal of Experimental Botany, 2015, 66(7):2055-2065.
doi: 10.1093/jxb/erv007 pmid: 25680794
[1] 王元元, 谷子寒, 陈平平, 易镇邪. 镉污染稻田玉米对水稻的季节性替代种植可行性研究[J]. 作物杂志, 2022, (4): 187–192
[2] 王家保, 冀怀远, 梅家法, 陶志国, 疏志峰, 江三桥. 玉米新品种荃科玉900的选育与栽培制种技术[J]. 作物杂志, 2022, (4): 267–270
[3] 雷蕾, 关哲允, 曹士亮, 王玉民, 林春晶, 彭宝, 刘鹏, 赵丽梅, 李志刚, 张春宝. 基于产量相关性状SSR分子标记的大豆杂种优势群划分[J]. 作物杂志, 2022, (4): 54–61
[4] 顾银山, 张士龙, 贾海涛, 李小琴, 贺正华, 焦春海, 田小海, 黄益勤, 危文亮. 超甜玉米果皮柔嫩度与成分含量动态变化及相互关系[J]. 作物杂志, 2022, (3): 134–142
[5] 杨奥军, 常巧玲, 王鹏, 王芳, 高妍婷, 周广阔, 宋小佳, 韦恩成. 外源5-ALA对干旱胁迫下玉米种子萌发及幼苗生长的影响[J]. 作物杂志, 2022, (3): 194–199
[6] 张军, 陈顺全, 张文庆, 李高超, Bell. 10份玉米品种在喀麦隆的适应性研究[J]. 作物杂志, 2022, (3): 87–91
[7] 曹丽茹, 鲁晓民, 王国瑞, 党尊, 邱天, 邱建军, 田云峰, 王振华, 党永富. 叶面喷施炭吸附聚谷氨酸对玉米生长发育的影响[J]. 作物杂志, 2022, (2): 158–166
[8] 李忠南, 王越人, 车丽梅, 邬生辉, 曲海涛, 宋涛, 李福林, 李光发. 通玉179六世代和DH世代4个穗部性状对比分析研究[J]. 作物杂志, 2022, (2): 64–68
[9] 房孟颖, 闫鹏, 卢霖, 王庆燕, 董志强. 乙矮合剂对不同氮水平夏玉米氮代谢及产量的调控效应[J]. 作物杂志, 2022, (2): 96–103
[10] 刘子刚, 卢海博, 武敏桦, 赵海超, 魏东, 黄智鸿. 化控剂玉黄金对春玉米抗倒伏性状及产量的影响[J]. 作物杂志, 2022, (1): 142–146
[11] 段琉颖, 吴婷, 李霞, 谢建坤, 胡标林. 水稻细胞质雄性不育及其育性恢复基因的研究进展[J]. 作物杂志, 2022, (1): 20–30
[12] 段雅娟, 曹士亮, 于滔, 李文跃, 杨耿斌, 王成波, 刘宝民, 刘长华. 玉米自交系萌发期耐盐性鉴定[J]. 作物杂志, 2022, (1): 213–219
[13] 冯素芬, 刘元剑, 许蕊淇, 张薇. 云南省近年审定鲜食玉米品种的主要性状分析[J]. 作物杂志, 2022, (1): 220–226
[14] 周德龙, 孟令聪, 郑淑波, 王楠, 李穆, 王薪淇, 卢实, 王敏, 刘文国, 路明. 一种快速高效检测转基因玉米方法的建立[J]. 作物杂志, 2022, (1): 65–69
[15] 黄莉群, 马玥, 戚新蕾, 孙秋玉, 董佳玉, 李冠甲, 马占鸿. 玉米品种对不同地区玉米南方锈菌的抗性评价[J]. 作物杂志, 2021, (6): 205–210
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!