Crops ›› 2016, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (2): 105-106.doi: 10.16035/j.issn.1001-7283.2016.02.019

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Effects of Selenium(Se) Fertilizer Concentration on Se Content of Red Peanut

Liu Yiming1,Ling Zhao1,Han Yufen1,Yang Guimei1,Wen Jingtao2   

  1. 1 Fangchenggang Agricultural Technology Extension Service Center,Fangchenggang 538001, Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region,China
    2 Fangchenggang Agricultural Products Quality and Safety Testing Center,Fangchenggang 538001,Guangxi Zhuang Autonomous Region,China
  • Received:2015-12-11 Revised:2016-03-28 Online:2016-04-15 Published:2018-08-26

Abstract:

Se-enriched effects of Se fertilizer on red peanut were evaluated by foliar spraying and drenching on the roots. The results showed that Se content of red peanut increased to the standard for Se-enriched agricultural products in Se-enriched soil without Se fertilizer, and red peanut had strong Se-enriched ability. Foliar spraying and drenching on the roots of Se fertilizer had extremely significant impact on Se content of red peanut, and the effect of foliar spraying was better than drenching on the roots.

Key words: Se-enriched soil, Se fertilizer, Red peanut, Effects of Se-enrichment

Table 1

Soil basic nutrient"

试验地点
Test site
pH 有机质(%)
Organic matter
碱解N
Alkaline hydrolysis N(mg/kg)
速效P
Quick-acting
P(mg/kg)
速效K
Quick-acting
K(mg/kg)
全硒含量
Total selenium content(mg/kg)
前茬作物
Previouscrop
前茬作物产量
Previous crop yield
(kg/hm2
河洲村
Hezhou village
6.2 2.61 153.35 44.4 79.5 0.724 甘薯Sweet potato 22 500
那旺村
Nawang village
6.0 2.60 131.47 25.9 40.0 0.400 水稻Rice 6 000

Table 2

The concentration and the amount of application of selenium fertilizer in each treatment"

处理Treatment 浓度(mg/mL)Concentration 施用量(g/hm2)Application rates 施用方法Application process
1 0.00 0 根部淋施 Root leaching
2 0.06 54 根部淋施 Root leaching
3 0.12 108 根部淋施 Root leaching
4 0.00 0 叶面喷施 Foliar application
5 0.24 54 叶面喷施 Foliar application
6 0.48 108 叶面喷施 Foliar application

Table 3

Effect of selenium fertilizer application on selenium content of red peanut"

试验地点
Test site
施肥方式Fertilization mode 施用量(g/hm2)Application rates 硒含量(mg/kg)Se content F0.01
重复ⅠRepeatⅠ 重复ⅡRepeatⅡ 重复ⅢRepeatⅢ 平均Average
河洲村
Hezhou village
根部淋施Root leaching 0 0.159 0.175 0.168 0.167 G
54 0.327 0.322 0.311 0.320 F
108 0.549 0.528 0.543 0.540 E
叶面喷施Foliar application 0 0.206 0.205 0.201 0.204 G
54 2.426 2.481 2.392 2.433 D
108 4.351 4.243 4.321 4.305 A
那旺村
Nawang village
根部淋施Root leaching 0 0.067 0.068 0.075 0.070 H
54 0.226 0.215 0.228 0.223 G
108 0.532 0.518 0.490 0.513 E
叶面喷施Foliar application 0 0.098 0.093 0.095 0.095 H
54 3.265 3.288 3.298 3.284 C
108 3.697 3.621 3.637 3.652 B
[1] Rayma M P . Selenium in cancer prevention: A review of the evidence and mechanism of action. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society, 2005,64:527-542.
doi: 10.1079/PNS2005467
[2] Zhu Y G , Pilon-Smits E A H,Zhao F J,et al.Selenium in higher plants:Understanding mechanisms for biofortification and phytoremediation. Trends in Plant Science, 2009,14:436-442.
doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2009.06.006
[3] 余守武, 陈合云, 郑学强 , 等. 水稻微量元素硒含量的遗传研究进展.作物杂志, 2010(2):6-10.
[4] 张现伟, 郑家奎, 张涛 , 等. 富硒水稻的研究意义与进展. 杂交水稻, 2009,24(2):5-9.
[5] 李家熙, 张光第, 陈晓立 , 等. 人体硒缺乏与过剩的地球化学环境特征及其预测.北京: 地质出版社, 2000.
[6] 刘爱华, 段克清, 张大明 . 硒对农作物影响的探讨.现代农业科技, 2008(22):209-210.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] Guangcai Zhao,Xuhong Chang,Demei Wang,Zhiqiang Tao,Yanjie Wang,Yushuang Yang,Yingjie Zhu. General Situation and Development of Wheat Production[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 1 -7 .
[2] Baoquan Quan,Dongmei Bai,Yuexia Tian,Yunyun Xue. Effects of Different Leaf-Peg Ratio on Photosynthesis and Yield of Peanut[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 102 -105 .
[3] Xuefang Huang,Mingjing Huang,Huatao Liu,Cong Zhao,Juanling Wang. Effects of Annual Precipitation and Population Density on Tiller-Earing and Yield of Zhangzagu 5 under Film Mulching and Hole Sowing[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 106 -113 .
[4] Wenhui Huang, Hui Wang, Desheng Mei. Research Progress on Lodging Resistance of Crops[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 13 -19 .
[5] Yun Zhao,Cailong Xu,Xu Yang,Suzhen Li,Jing Zhou,Jicun Li,Tianfu Han,Cunxiang Wu. Effects of Sowing Methods on Seedling Stand and Production Profit of Summer Soybean under Wheat-Soybean System[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 114 -120 .
[6] Mei Lu,Min Sun,Aixia Ren,Miaomiao Lei,Lingzhu Xue,Zhiqiang Gao. Effects of Spraying Foliar Fertilizers on Dryland Wheat Growth and the Correlation with Yield Formation[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 121 -125 .
[7] Xiaofei Wang,Haijun Xu,Mengqiao Guo,Yu Xiao,Xinyu Cheng,Shuxia Liu,Xiangjun Guan,Yaokun Wu,Weihua Zhao,Guojiang Wei. Effects of Sowing Date, Density and Fertilizer Utilization Rate on the Yield of Oilseed Perilla frutescens in Cold Area[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 126 -130 .
[8] Pengjin Zhu,Xinhua Pang,Chun Liang,Qinliang Tan,Lin Yan,Quanguang Zhou,Kewei Ou. Effects of Cold Stress on Reactive Oxygen Metabolism and Antioxidant Enzyme Activities of Sugarcane Seedlings[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 131 -137 .
[9] Jie Gao,Qingfeng Li,Qiu Peng,Xiaoyan Jiao,Jinsong Wang. Effects of Different Nutrient Combinations on Plant Production and Nitrogen, Phosphorus and Potassium Utilization Characteristics in Waxy Sorghum[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 138 -142 .
[10] Na Shang,Zhongxu Yang,Qiuzhi Li,Huihui Yin,Shihong Wang,Haitao Li,Tong Li,Han Zhang. Response of Cotton with Vegetative Branches to Plant Density in the Western of Shandong Province[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 143 -148 .