Crops ›› 2016, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (2): 100-104.doi: 10.16035/j.issn.1001-7283.2016.02.018

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Effects of Sowing Date and Density on Yield of Soybean Variety Qihuang 34

Zhang Sumei2,Liu Yuqin2,Xu Ran1   

  1. 1 Crop Institute,Shandong Academy of Agricultural Sciences,Jinan 250100,Shandong,China
    2 Linyi Academy of Agricultural Sciences,Linyi 276012,Shandong,China
  • Received:2016-01-25 Revised:2016-02-27 Online:2016-04-15 Published:2018-08-26
  • Contact: Ran Xu

RichHTML

13

PDF (PC)

177

Abstract:

This experiment was designed to investigate the effects of different sowing date and planting density on yield of soybean variety Qihuang 34. The results showed that with the delay of sowing date or with the increase of density, the yield showed a trend of first increasing and then decreasing. Significant differences were observed among treatments. The best sowing time was June 17 and the best planting density was 195 thousand plants/hm 2.The yield of Qihuang 34 reached to 3 615.14kg/hm 2.

Key words: Soybean, Qihuang 34, Sowing date, Density, Yield

Table 1

Effects of different sowing time and density on yield kg/hm2"

播期
Sowing date		 密度Density 平均
Average
B1 B2 B3 B4 B5 B6 B7
A1 3 011.51 3 271.64 3 525.10 3 561.78 3 438.39 3 298.32 3 231.62 3 333.097
A2 3 228.28 3 381.69 3 551.78 3 615.14 3 461.73 3 378.36 3 304.99 3 417.424
A3 3 178.26 3 208.27 3 401.70 3 488.41 3 411.71 3 288.31 3 214.94 3 311.181
A4 3 058.20 3 151.58 3 318.33 3 401.70 3 318.33 3 288.31 3 164.92 3 242.053
A5 2 658.00 2 768.05 2 871.44 2 994.83 3 021.51 2 991.50 2 884.78 2 884.300
A6 2 254.46 2 281.14 2 434.55 2 504.59 2 567.95 2 564.62 2 537.94 2 449.321
平均Average 2 898.118 3 010.395 3 194.377 3 237.175 3 214.387 3 133.791 3 056.530 3 106.400

Table 2

Variance analysis of plot yield"

源Source 平方和Sum of squares 自由度df 均方Mean square F sig
区组间Between group 8 153.347 2 4 076.673 0.456 0.635
A因素间Between A factor 14 486 173.800 5 2 897 234.760 324.206 0.000
B因素间Between B factor 1 662 100.886 6 277 016.814 30.999 0.000
A×B 432 268.952 30 14 408.965 1.612 0.047
误差Error 732 784.571 82 8 936.397

Table 3

Multiples comparison of soybean yield in different sowing dates"

播期
Sowing date		 产量
Seed yield
(kg/hm2)		 5%显著水平
Significant level		 1%极显著水平
Extremely
significant level
A2 3 417.424 a A
A1 3 333.097 b AB
A3 3 311.181 b B
A4 3 242.053 c B
A5 2 884.300 d C
A6 2 449.321 e D

Table 4

Multiples comparison of soybean yield in different plangting denisity"

密度
Density		 产量
Seed yield
(kg/hm2）		 5%显著水平Significant level 1%极显著水平Extremely
significant level
B4 3 237.175 a A
B5 3 214.387 a A
B3 3 194.377 ab A
B6 3 133.791 b AB
B7 3 056.530 c BC
B2 3 010.395 c C
B1 2 898.118 d D

Fig.1

Effects of interaction between sowing date and density on yield"

Table 5

Effects of different sowing date on agronomic traits and yield of Qihuang 34"

播期
Sowing date		 株高
PH(cm)		 底荚高度BPH(cm) 主茎节数
NNMS		 单株有效分枝数
EBNPP		 单株荚数
PNPP		 单株粒数
SNPP		 单株粒重
SWPP(g)		 百粒重
SW(g)		 产量
SY(kg/hm2)
A1 43.0 10.8 12.2 1.0 28.0 69.2 18.3 26.5 3 333.097
A2 62.3 18.1 13.3 1.1 29.1 79.8 20.7 26.1 3 417.424
A3 66.5 17.5 14.5 1.3 28.8 80.0 21.3 26.7 3 311.181
A4 70.3 19.0 14.9 1.2 26.9 71.4 18.8 27.2 3 243.053
A5 65.1 19.0 14.3 1.5 24.9 64.1 17.6 27.6 2 884.300
A6 60.3 15.6 13.2 1.1 20.9 54.2 13.7 25.2 2 449.321
平均Average 61.3 16.7 13.7 1.2 26.4 69.8 18.4 26.6 3 106.400
CV(%) 15.6 18.8 7.3 14.9 11.8 14.1 14.7 3.2 12.0

Table 6

Effects of different density treatment on agronomic traits and yield of Qihuang 34"

密度
Density		 株高
PH(cm)		 底荚高度BPH(cm) 主茎节数
NNMS		 单株有效分枝数
EBNPP		 单株荚数
PNPP		 单株粒数
SNPP		 单株粒重
SWPP(g)		 百粒重
SW(g)		 产量
SY(kg/hm2)
B1 55.6 15.4 13.9 2.2 37.3 98.4 25.9 26.3 2 898.118
B2 58.1 15.2 13.6 1.8 32.3 86.5 22.6 26.2 3 010.395
B3 59.3 15.3 13.4 1.6 29.2 75.1 19.9 26.5 3 194.377
B4 60.6 16.1 14.1 1.2 26.2 70.4 18.6 26.6 3 237.175
B5 65.1 17.7 13.8 0.9 22.5 59.8 15.8 26.4 3 214.387
B6 64.1 18.0 13.9 0.5 19.0 51.3 13.5 26.2 3 133.791
B7 66.2 19.1 13.3 0.3 18.4 47.0 12.5 26.6 3 056.530
平均Average 61.3 16.7 13.7 1.2 26.4 69.8 18.4 26.4 3 106.400
CV(%) 6.4 9.4 2.1 57.3 26.6 26.7 26.4 0.7 4.0
[1] 徐冉, 王彩洁, 张礼凤 , 等. 高产优质多抗广适大豆新品种齐黄34的选育. 山东农业科学, 2013,45(3):107-108.
[2] 董钻 . 大豆株型、群体结构与产量关系的研究. 大豆科学, 1986,5(2):110-120.
[3] 焦浩, 纪永民, 张存岭 , 等. 种植方式和密度对大豆产量和单株性状的影响.作物杂志, 2008(5):56-59.
[4] 王志新 . 播期和密度对高油高产大豆合丰50脂肪含量及产量的影响. 大豆科学, 2009,28(6):1008-1010.
[5] 谢运河, 李小红, 王同华 , 等. 播期与密度对南方早熟春大豆产量和品质的影响.作物杂志, 2011(3):79-82.
[6] 李洪杰, 张小燕, 赵晋铭 , 等. 不同密度与肥水处理对鲁黄1号大豆产量及农艺性状的影响. 大豆科学, 2012,31(5):753-756.
[7] 徐婷, 雍太文, 刘文钰 , 等. 播期和密度对玉米-大豆套作模式下大豆植株、干物质积累及产量的影响. 中国油料作物学报, 2014,36(5):593-601.
doi: 10.7505/j.issn.1007-9084.2014.05.006
[8] 耿臻, 杨青春, 苑保军 . 不同播期和密度对周豆11产量构成因素及产量的影响. 中国农学通报, 2006,22(6):170-172.
[9] 赵双进, 张孟臣, 杨春燕 , 等. 栽培因子对大豆生长发育及群体产量的影响. 中国油料作物学报, 2002,4(24):30-32.
[10] Robinson A P . Analysis of high yielding, early-planted soybean in Indiana. Agronomy Journal, 2000,101(1):131-139.
[11] Egli D B, Cornelius P L . A regional analysis of the response of soybean yield to planting date. Agronomy Journal, 2009,101(2):330-335.
doi: 10.2134/agronj2008.0148
[12] Chen G H, Wiattak P . Soybean development and yield are influenced by planting date and enbironment conditions in the southeastern coastal plain, United States. Agronomy Journal, 2010,102:1731-1737.
doi: 10.2134/agronj2010.0219
[13] 粱福琴, 王晓霞, 郭泰 , 等. 不同播种期对大豆产量及相关农艺性状的影响.作物杂志, 2015(6):155-158.
[14] 李灿东, 窦亚南, 刘琦 , 等. 播种期对北方春早熟大豆生育进程及产量相关性状的影响.作物杂志, 2015(6):112-116.
[15] 吴海英, 于晓波, 梁建秋 , 等. 播期对套作专用高蛋白大豆农艺性状、产量及品质的影响. 大豆科学, 2015,34(5):801-807.
[16] 王文斌, 曹永强, 闫春娟 , 等. 密度和植株配置对大豆主要农艺及生理性状的影响. 大豆科学, 2014,33(4):502-506.
[17] 王新兵, 侯海鹏, 马玮 , 等. 不同生态区种植密度对大豆产量及产量构成的影响.作物杂志, 2013(5):114-119.
[18] 耿臻, 杨青春, 舒文涛 , 等. 栽培措施对周豆19产量及农艺性状的影响. 大豆科学, 2013,32(5):718-721.
[1] Zhao Xin, Chen Shaofeng, Wang Hui, . Research on the Yield and Quality of Different Tartaty#br# Buckwheat Varieties in Northern Shanxi Area [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 27-32.
[2] Zhang Xiangyu, Li Hai, Liang Haiyan, . Effects of Different Row Spacing and Planting Density#br# on the Growth Characteristics and Yield of Millet [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 91-96.
[3] Wu Ronghua, Zhuang Kezhang, Liu Peng, Zhang Chunyan. Response of Summer Maize Yield to#br# Meteorological Factors in Lunan Region [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 104-109.
[4] Su Feifei, Zhang Jinghua, Li Yong, Liu Shangwu, Liu Zhenyu, Wang Shaopeng, Wan Shuming, Chen Xi, Gao Yunfei, Hu Linshuang, Lü Dianqiu. Effects of Different Irrigation Methods on#br# Physiological Characteristics and Water#br# Use Efficiency of Potato [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 97-103.
[5] Zhang Ruidong, Cao Xiong, Yue Zhongxiao, . Effects of Nitrogen and Density Interaction on Grain#br# Yield and Nitrogen Use Efficiency of Sorghum [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 110-115.
[6] An Xia, Zhang Haijun, Jiang Fangshan, Lü Lianjie, Chen Jun. Effects of Different Sowing Dates and Sowing#br# Densities on the Population Structure and#br# Yield of Two Spike Type Winter Wheats [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 132-136.
[7] Gao Wenjun, Yang Guoyi, Gao Xinzhong, Yu Zhu, . The Effects of Nitrogen, Phosphorus, or Potassium#br# Fertilizer on the Yield and Silage Quality of Maize [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 144-149.
[8] Wang Xiaolin, Ji Xiaoling, Zhang Panpan, Zhang Xiong, Zhang Jing. Correlation Analysis between Aboveground Biomass#br# Allocation and Grain Yield in Different Varieties of#br# Foxtail Millet in the Dry Land of Loess Plateau [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 150-155.
[9] Yun Zhao,Cailong Xu,Xu Yang,Suzhen Li,Jing Zhou,Jicun Li,Tianfu Han,Cunxiang Wu. Effects of Sowing Methods on Seedling Stand and Production Profit of Summer Soybean under Wheat-Soybean System [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 114-120.
[10] Mei Lu,Min Sun,Aixia Ren,Miaomiao Lei,Lingzhu Xue,Zhiqiang Gao. Effects of Spraying Foliar Fertilizers on Dryland Wheat Growth and the Correlation with Yield Formation [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 121-125.
[11] Xiaofei Wang,Haijun Xu,Mengqiao Guo,Yu Xiao,Xinyu Cheng,Shuxia Liu,Xiangjun Guan,Yaokun Wu,Weihua Zhao,Guojiang Wei. Effects of Sowing Date, Density and Fertilizer Utilization Rate on the Yield of Oilseed Perilla frutescens in Cold Area [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 126-130.
[12] Jie Gao,Qingfeng Li,Qiu Peng,Xiaoyan Jiao,Jinsong Wang. Effects of Different Nutrient Combinations on Plant Production and Nitrogen, Phosphorus and Potassium Utilization Characteristics in Waxy Sorghum [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 138-142.
[13] Na Shang,Zhongxu Yang,Qiuzhi Li,Huihui Yin,Shihong Wang,Haitao Li,Tong Li,Han Zhang. Response of Cotton with Vegetative Branches to Plant Density in the Western of Shandong Province [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 143-148.
[14] Huiqin Wen,Tianling Cheng,Ziyou Pei,Xue Li,Lisheng Zhang,Mei Zhu. Analysis of Comprehensive Characteristics of Wheat Varieties Registered in Shanxi Province in Recent Years [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 32-36.
[15] Menghan Wei, Huifang Xie, Lu Xing, Hui Song, Shujun Wang, Suying Wang, Haiping Liu, Nan Fu, Jinrong Liu. Comprehensive Evaluation of Yield and Agronomic Characters of Foxtail Millet Germplasms from North China [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 42-47.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] Guangcai Zhao,Xuhong Chang,Demei Wang,Zhiqiang Tao,Yanjie Wang,Yushuang Yang,Yingjie Zhu. General Situation and Development of Wheat Production[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 1 -7 .
[2] Baoquan Quan,Dongmei Bai,Yuexia Tian,Yunyun Xue. Effects of Different Leaf-Peg Ratio on Photosynthesis and Yield of Peanut[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 102 -105 .
[3] Xuefang Huang,Mingjing Huang,Huatao Liu,Cong Zhao,Juanling Wang. Effects of Annual Precipitation and Population Density on Tiller-Earing and Yield of Zhangzagu 5 under Film Mulching and Hole Sowing[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 106 -113 .
[4] Wenhui Huang, Hui Wang, Desheng Mei. Research Progress on Lodging Resistance of Crops[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 13 -19 .
[5] Yun Zhao,Cailong Xu,Xu Yang,Suzhen Li,Jing Zhou,Jicun Li,Tianfu Han,Cunxiang Wu. Effects of Sowing Methods on Seedling Stand and Production Profit of Summer Soybean under Wheat-Soybean System[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 114 -120 .
[6] Mei Lu,Min Sun,Aixia Ren,Miaomiao Lei,Lingzhu Xue,Zhiqiang Gao. Effects of Spraying Foliar Fertilizers on Dryland Wheat Growth and the Correlation with Yield Formation[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 121 -125 .
[7] Xiaofei Wang,Haijun Xu,Mengqiao Guo,Yu Xiao,Xinyu Cheng,Shuxia Liu,Xiangjun Guan,Yaokun Wu,Weihua Zhao,Guojiang Wei. Effects of Sowing Date, Density and Fertilizer Utilization Rate on the Yield of Oilseed Perilla frutescens in Cold Area[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 126 -130 .
[8] Pengjin Zhu,Xinhua Pang,Chun Liang,Qinliang Tan,Lin Yan,Quanguang Zhou,Kewei Ou. Effects of Cold Stress on Reactive Oxygen Metabolism and Antioxidant Enzyme Activities of Sugarcane Seedlings[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 131 -137 .
[9] Jie Gao,Qingfeng Li,Qiu Peng,Xiaoyan Jiao,Jinsong Wang. Effects of Different Nutrient Combinations on Plant Production and Nitrogen, Phosphorus and Potassium Utilization Characteristics in Waxy Sorghum[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 138 -142 .
[10] Na Shang,Zhongxu Yang,Qiuzhi Li,Huihui Yin,Shihong Wang,Haitao Li,Tong Li,Han Zhang. Response of Cotton with Vegetative Branches to Plant Density in the Western of Shandong Province[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 143 -148 .