Crops ›› 2016, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (6): 142-147.doi: 10.16035/j.issn.1001-7283.2016.06.024

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Optimization of the Overwintering Planting Density, Germchit,Base Fertilizer and Transplanting Period for Leaf-Vegetable Sweet Potato Seedlings

Xu Qian1,Li Hua1,Zong Hongxia1,Dan Fang1,Wang Zumin2   

  1. 1 Chongqing Three Gorges Academy of Agricultural Sciences,Wanzhou 404155,Chongqing,China
    2 Agricultural Service Center of Baitu Town,Wanzhou 404025,Chongqing,China
  • Received:2016-08-22 Revised:2016-10-27 Online:2016-12-15 Published:2018-08-26

RichHTML

3

PDF (PC)

131

Abstract:

To investigate the optimum cultivation technology for leaf-vegetable sweet potato seedlings through the whole winter and break the obstacle to reserve the source supply, L9(3 4) orthogonal experiment design was used to study the plant density, seedling number, fertilizers and transplanting time of Ecaishu No.1 and the therefrom impact on production. The results showed that the combination of T9 was the best combination of the experiment, with a plant density of 2.85×10 5 plant/hm 2, seedling planting type, fertilizers (45% compound fertilizer 750kg/hm 2+calcium superphosphate 450kg/hm 2), and transplanting time in late September. In the next year, the yield of sweet potato seedlings reached more than 8.85×10 4kg/hm 2, from March to mid-June.

Key words: Leaf-vegetable sweet potato, Density, Germchit, Base fertilizer, Transplanting time, Overwintering properties, Yield

Table 1

The factors and levels of L9(34) orthogonal experiment"

水平Level 因素Factor
密度Density (万株/hm2) A 种苗Seedling B 底肥（45%复合肥+过磷酸钙）Base fertilizer (kg/hm2) C 栽插期Planting date D
1 19.5 茎尖苗 150+150 9-24
2 24.0 二节苗 450+300 10-09
3 28.5 茎尖摘心苗 750+450 10-15

Table 2

L9(34) orthogonal design"

处理
Treatment		 因素Factor 组合
Combination
A B C D
T1 1 1 1 1 A1B1C1D1
T2 1 2 2 2 A1B2C2D2
T3 1 3 3 3 A1B3C3D3
T4 2 1 2 3 A2B1C2D3
T5 2 2 3 1 A2B2C3D1
T6 2 3 1 2 A2B3C1D2
T7 3 1 3 2 A3B1C3D2
T8 3 2 1 3 A3B2C1D3
T9 3 3 2 1 A3B3C2D1

Table 3

Weather and ambient temperature in test period"

生长时段Growth period 日期
Date		 天气
Weather		 气温(℃)
Air temperature
露地生长期
Open growth		 10-16 小雨 19~16
10-23 多云 25~15
10-29 阴转小雨 19~16
11-04 多云 18~12
大棚生长准备期
Greenhouse growth preparation		 11-05 多云 20~10
11-12 阴 18~13
11-19 晴 19~10
11-26 多云 17~12
12-01 小雨 13~9
大棚生长期Greenhouse growth 12-02 阴 12~8
12-08 多云 15~9
生长时段Growth period 日期
Date		 天气
Weather		 气温(℃)
Air temperature
12-15 小雨转阴 8~3
12-22 多云 11~5
12-29 多云 12~5
1-05 小雨 11~8
1-12 晴 14~6
1-19 多云 15~7
1-26 阴 16~10
2-02 晴 8~5
2-09 多云 13~6
2-13 多云 18~5
2-16 晴 20~9
2-23 多云转晴 17~9
3-01 多云 13~7
3-08 多云 18~8
3-14 阵雨 21~9
大棚生长后期
Greenhouse late growth		 3-23 晴 21~14
3-27 晴 26~15
4-03 晴 25~15
4-15 晴 27~19
露地生长期Open growth 4-16 晴 28~20

Table 4

Performance of overwintering seedlings"

处理Treatment 存活率(%)
Survival rate		 苗高(cm)
Seedling height		 分枝数（个/株）
Branch number		 首次产量(kg/小区)
First seedling weight		 地下茎产量(kg/厢)
Underground stem yield		 地下薯块产量(kg/厢)
Underground tuber yield
T1 95.73aA 45.57aA 2.33abAB 6.05bcdBC 1.43cdeABC 1.57dC
T2 89.31aA 28.27cdC 2.73aA 4.30eC 1.19eC 0.96fgD
T3 89.74aA 30.30cBC 2.77aA 6.31bcABC 1.48bcdABC 1.21eD
T4 94.80aA 37.83bAB 2.33abAB 7.17abcAB 1.65abcAB 0.90gD
T5 96.53aA 41.77abA 2.43abAB 7.24abcAB 1.54abcdABC 2.05bB
T6 93.40aA 29.40cdBC 2.80aA 5.73cdeBC 1.52abcdABC 1.18efD
T7 90.64aA 39.23abAB 1.47cB 7.39abAB 1.71abAB 1.82cBC
T8 90.04aA 23.20dC 1.73bcAB 4.61deC 1.37deBC 1.02efgD
T9 96.78aA 43.13abA 2.27abAB 8.47aA 1.76aA 3.37aA

Table 5

Seedlings yield at different harvesting time"

处理
Treatment		 前期(kg/厢)
Early stage		 采收期(kg/厢)
Harvest period		 总产量(kg/hm2)
Total yield
T1 18.21bA 29.25dB 73 867.35
T2 15.48cB 26.21eC 66 190.20
T3 18.99abA 30.75bcdB 77 655.45
T4 19.26abA 31.72bcB 80 104.95
T5 19.67abA 32.36bAB 81 721.20
T6 18.65abA 29.88cdB 75 458.25
T7 20.79aA 35.18aA 88 842.90
T8 19.01abA 29.99bcdB 75 736.05
T9 20.53aA 35.23aA 88 969.05

Table 6

Variance analysis (F value) of seedling height, branch number, and harvest yield of different stage"

变异来源
Variation source		 自由度
df		 苗高
Seeding height		 分枝数
Branch number		 首次产量
The first time yield		 前期产量
Early stage yield		 后期产量
Late stage yield		 薯苗总产量
Total yield
区组Block 2 38.83 0.0015 0.95 0.33 0.53 2.17
处理Treatment 8 182.27** 0.63** 5.52** 7.18** 2.39** 24.29**
密度Density 2 6.25 1.68** 4.44** 14.99** 5.38** 48.41**
种苗Germchit 2 224.76** 0.72* 6.49** 5.48* 0.64 19.27**
底肥Base fertilizer 2 49.87* 0.12 5.72** 5.08* 2.69* 19.93**
栽插期Planting date 2 448.19** 0.01 5.44** 3.16 0.83 9.55*
误差Error 16 13.73 0.17 0.75 1.11 0.52 1.66
总变异Total error 26

Table 7

Difference analysis of seedling height and branch number"

因素Factor 水平Level 苗高Seedling height (cm) 因素Factor 水平Level 分枝数Branch number
种苗Germchit 1 40.88aA 密度Planting density 1 2.61aA
3 34.28bB 2 2.52aA
2 31.08bB 3 1.82bB
底肥Base fertilizer 3 37.10aA 种苗Germchit 3 2.61aA
2 36.41aA 2 2.30aA
1 32.72bA 1 2.04bA
栽插期Planting date 1 43.49aA - - -
2 32.30bB - - -
3 30.44bB - - -

Table 8

Variance analysis of seedling yield in the different harvest time"

因素Factor 首次The first time 前期Early stage 后期Late stage 水平
Level		 总产量
Total yield
水平Level 产量Yield 水平Level 产量Yield 水平Level 产量Yield
密度Density 3 6.82aA 3 20.11aA 3 9.95aA 3 33.47aA
2 6.71abAB 2 19.19aA 2 8.77bB 2 31.32bB
1 5.55bB 1 17.56bB 1 8.49bB 1 28.83cC
种苗Germchit 1 6.87aA 1 19.42aA - - 1 32.14aA
3 6.84aA 3 19.39aA - - 3 31.95aA
2 5.38bB 2 18.05bA - - 2 29.52bB
底肥Base fertilizer 3 6.98aA 3 19.82aA 3 9.46aA 3 32.77aA
2 6.65aAB 1 18.63bA 2 9.30aA 2 31.05bAB
1 5.46bB 2 18.42bA 1 8.44bA 1 29.80bB
栽插期Planting date 1 7.25aA - - - - 1 32.37aA
3 6.03bB - - - - 3 30.82bA
2 5.81bB - - - - 2 30.42bA
[1] 王建玲, 林祖军, 辛国胜 , 等. 不同用途的甘薯栽培方式综述.作物杂志, 2011(3):104-106.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7283.2011.03.027
[2] 徐丹, 姚莹, 翟福勤 , 等. 嘉兴地区叶用甘薯大棚栽培技术.长江蔬菜, 2016(15):26-27.
[3] 江苏省农业科学院. 中国甘薯栽培学.上海: 上海科技出版社, 1984.
[4] 望宇洪, 杨新笋, 姚国新 , 等. 菜用甘薯的特征特性与研究现状.湖北农业科学, 2011(10):2028-2030.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0439-8114.2011.10.026
[5] 张立明, 马代夫 . 中国甘薯主要栽培模式.北京: 中国农业科学技术出版社, 2012.
[6] 徐茜, 黎华, 杨洪霞 , 等. 重庆地区叶菜用甘薯不同栽植密度下茎尖产量及其食用品质评价. 南方农业学报, 2015,46(4):587-591.
[7] 徐茜, 黎华 . 叶菜型甘薯大棚越冬栽培薯苗存活率及其产量性状表现. 贵州农业科学, 2015,43(6):40-43.
[8] 郑守贵, 刘克荣, 郑世千 , 等. 叶菜型甘薯鄂菜薯1号大棚越冬早春苗试验研究.现代农业科技, 2014(18):77-78,81.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-5739.2014.18.049
[9] 蔡章棣 . 叶菜型甘薯品种福薯10号高产栽培技术.中国种业, 2008(11):55.
[10] 郭源俊 . 甘薯藤苗越冬繁育技术.江西农业科技, 2004(7):24-25.
[11] 张保华, 张仕刚 . 利用甘薯藤越冬繁苗技术.安徽农业, 2002(12):19.
[12] 卢新建, 许朝辉, 吕美琴 , 等. 甘薯菜用品种的筛选与利用研究初报.福建农业科技, 2002(1):9-10.
[13] 李建国, 朱德雄, 肖义芳 , 等. 保护地叶用薯越冬保苗栽培技术.长江蔬菜, 2012(11):28-29.
[14] 颜伯霖, 毛万烈, 赵保春 , 等. 甘薯秋藤越冬育苗技术及应用效果.农业科技通讯, 1999(9):8-9.
[15] 李明福, 徐宁生, 许建辉 , 等. 甘薯不同茎蔓节段栽培效果研究. 中国农学通报, 2014,30(24):147-151.
[16] 孙富年, 黄元射, 李明 , 等. 不同蔬菜型甘薯在不同种植密度下茎尖产量和品质. 江苏农业学报, 2008,24(3):312-315.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-4440.2008.03.019
[17] 蔡南通, 邱永祥, 吴秋云 , 等. 叶菜型甘薯栽培技术及施氮安全研究. 山西农业大学学报, 2006,26(1):13-15.
[1] Zhao Xin, Chen Shaofeng, Wang Hui, . Research on the Yield and Quality of Different Tartaty#br# Buckwheat Varieties in Northern Shanxi Area [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 27-32.
[2] Zhang Xiangyu, Li Hai, Liang Haiyan, . Effects of Different Row Spacing and Planting Density#br# on the Growth Characteristics and Yield of Millet [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 91-96.
[3] Wu Ronghua, Zhuang Kezhang, Liu Peng, Zhang Chunyan. Response of Summer Maize Yield to#br# Meteorological Factors in Lunan Region [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 104-109.
[4] Su Feifei, Zhang Jinghua, Li Yong, Liu Shangwu, Liu Zhenyu, Wang Shaopeng, Wan Shuming, Chen Xi, Gao Yunfei, Hu Linshuang, Lü Dianqiu. Effects of Different Irrigation Methods on#br# Physiological Characteristics and Water#br# Use Efficiency of Potato [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 97-103.
[5] Zhang Ruidong, Cao Xiong, Yue Zhongxiao, . Effects of Nitrogen and Density Interaction on Grain#br# Yield and Nitrogen Use Efficiency of Sorghum [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 110-115.
[6] An Xia, Zhang Haijun, Jiang Fangshan, Lü Lianjie, Chen Jun. Effects of Different Sowing Dates and Sowing#br# Densities on the Population Structure and#br# Yield of Two Spike Type Winter Wheats [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 132-136.
[7] Gao Wenjun, Yang Guoyi, Gao Xinzhong, Yu Zhu, . The Effects of Nitrogen, Phosphorus, or Potassium#br# Fertilizer on the Yield and Silage Quality of Maize [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 144-149.
[8] Wang Xiaolin, Ji Xiaoling, Zhang Panpan, Zhang Xiong, Zhang Jing. Correlation Analysis between Aboveground Biomass#br# Allocation and Grain Yield in Different Varieties of#br# Foxtail Millet in the Dry Land of Loess Plateau [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 150-155.
[9] Mei Lu,Min Sun,Aixia Ren,Miaomiao Lei,Lingzhu Xue,Zhiqiang Gao. Effects of Spraying Foliar Fertilizers on Dryland Wheat Growth and the Correlation with Yield Formation [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 121-125.
[10] Xiaofei Wang,Haijun Xu,Mengqiao Guo,Yu Xiao,Xinyu Cheng,Shuxia Liu,Xiangjun Guan,Yaokun Wu,Weihua Zhao,Guojiang Wei. Effects of Sowing Date, Density and Fertilizer Utilization Rate on the Yield of Oilseed Perilla frutescens in Cold Area [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 126-130.
[11] Jie Gao,Qingfeng Li,Qiu Peng,Xiaoyan Jiao,Jinsong Wang. Effects of Different Nutrient Combinations on Plant Production and Nitrogen, Phosphorus and Potassium Utilization Characteristics in Waxy Sorghum [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 138-142.
[12] Na Shang,Zhongxu Yang,Qiuzhi Li,Huihui Yin,Shihong Wang,Haitao Li,Tong Li,Han Zhang. Response of Cotton with Vegetative Branches to Plant Density in the Western of Shandong Province [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 143-148.
[13] Huiqin Wen,Tianling Cheng,Ziyou Pei,Xue Li,Lisheng Zhang,Mei Zhu. Analysis of Comprehensive Characteristics of Wheat Varieties Registered in Shanxi Province in Recent Years [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 32-36.
[14] Menghan Wei, Huifang Xie, Lu Xing, Hui Song, Shujun Wang, Suying Wang, Haiping Liu, Nan Fu, Jinrong Liu. Comprehensive Evaluation of Yield and Agronomic Characters of Foxtail Millet Germplasms from North China [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 42-47.
[15] Xingchuan Zhang, Wenxuan Huang, Kuanyu Zhu, Zhiqin Wang, Jianchang Yang. Effects of Nitrogen Rates on the Nitrogen Use Efficiency and Agronomic Traits of Different Rice Cultivars [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 69-78.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] Guangcai Zhao,Xuhong Chang,Demei Wang,Zhiqiang Tao,Yanjie Wang,Yushuang Yang,Yingjie Zhu. General Situation and Development of Wheat Production[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 1 -7 .
[2] Baoquan Quan,Dongmei Bai,Yuexia Tian,Yunyun Xue. Effects of Different Leaf-Peg Ratio on Photosynthesis and Yield of Peanut[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 102 -105 .
[3] Xuefang Huang,Mingjing Huang,Huatao Liu,Cong Zhao,Juanling Wang. Effects of Annual Precipitation and Population Density on Tiller-Earing and Yield of Zhangzagu 5 under Film Mulching and Hole Sowing[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 106 -113 .
[4] Wenhui Huang, Hui Wang, Desheng Mei. Research Progress on Lodging Resistance of Crops[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 13 -19 .
[5] Yun Zhao,Cailong Xu,Xu Yang,Suzhen Li,Jing Zhou,Jicun Li,Tianfu Han,Cunxiang Wu. Effects of Sowing Methods on Seedling Stand and Production Profit of Summer Soybean under Wheat-Soybean System[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 114 -120 .
[6] Mei Lu,Min Sun,Aixia Ren,Miaomiao Lei,Lingzhu Xue,Zhiqiang Gao. Effects of Spraying Foliar Fertilizers on Dryland Wheat Growth and the Correlation with Yield Formation[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 121 -125 .
[7] Xiaofei Wang,Haijun Xu,Mengqiao Guo,Yu Xiao,Xinyu Cheng,Shuxia Liu,Xiangjun Guan,Yaokun Wu,Weihua Zhao,Guojiang Wei. Effects of Sowing Date, Density and Fertilizer Utilization Rate on the Yield of Oilseed Perilla frutescens in Cold Area[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 126 -130 .
[8] Pengjin Zhu,Xinhua Pang,Chun Liang,Qinliang Tan,Lin Yan,Quanguang Zhou,Kewei Ou. Effects of Cold Stress on Reactive Oxygen Metabolism and Antioxidant Enzyme Activities of Sugarcane Seedlings[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 131 -137 .
[9] Jie Gao,Qingfeng Li,Qiu Peng,Xiaoyan Jiao,Jinsong Wang. Effects of Different Nutrient Combinations on Plant Production and Nitrogen, Phosphorus and Potassium Utilization Characteristics in Waxy Sorghum[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 138 -142 .
[10] Na Shang,Zhongxu Yang,Qiuzhi Li,Huihui Yin,Shihong Wang,Haitao Li,Tong Li,Han Zhang. Response of Cotton with Vegetative Branches to Plant Density in the Western of Shandong Province[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 143 -148 .