Crops ›› 2016, Vol. 32 ›› Issue (4): 68-74.doi: 10.16035/j.issn.1001-7283.2016.04.011

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Tissue Culture and Rapid Propagation of Strawberry

Li Xiaoliang,Zhang Junyun,Zhang Zhong,Zhang Cuiping,Yang Shixian,Wang Wenzhi,Zhang Jiankang,Duan Yonghua   

  1. Yuxi Academy of Agricultural Sciences,Yuxi 653100,Yunnan,China
  • Received:2016-03-16 Revised:2016-06-01 Online:2016-08-15 Published:2018-08-26
  • Contact: Junyun Zhang

Abstract:

Taking one main strawberry variety of Guinugan as sample,experiments were carried out to study the effects of 9 factors (HgCl2,basal medium,white granulated sugar,etc.) on tip-shoot tissue culture of strawberry,and then to screen out a tip-shoot tissue culture technology for strawberry,which could produce better quality seedlings,and eventually to establish a relatively complete tip-shoot tissue culture and rapid propagation system in strawberry. The results showed that 9 factors had great effects on strawberry tip-shoot tissue culture.The best sterilization approach for explants was to treat 8-11min by 0.20% HgCl2,the suitable primary culture medium was MS+6-BA 0.5-1.0mg/L+NAA 0.01mg/L+white granulated sugar 30g/L,the suitable proliferation medium was MS+6-BA 0.5-1.0mg/L+NAA 0.01-0.05mg/L+white granulated sugar 20-30g/L,and the suitable rooting medium was MS+NAA 0-0.01mg/L+IBA 0-0.1mg/L+IAA 0-0.1mg/L+ white granulated sugar 30g/L.

Key words: Strawberry, Tip-shoot, Tissue culture, Rapid propagation, Medium, Orthogonal experiment

Table 1

Orthogonal experiments L9(34) design of strawberry proliferation subculture"

处理
Treatments
基础培养基
Basal medium
6-BA
(mg/L)
NAA
(mg/L)
白砂糖(g/L)
White granulated sugar
1 MS 0.5 0.01 20
2 MS 1.0 0.05 25
3 MS 2.0 0.10 30
4 1/2 MS 0.5 0.05 30
5 1/2 MS 1.0 0.10 20
6 1/2 MS 2.0 0.01 25
7 1/4 MS 0.5 0.10 25
8 1/4 MS 1.0 0.01 30
9 1/4 MS 2.0 0.05 20

Table 2

Experimental designs (orthogonal experiments and comparative experiments) of strawberry rooting culture"

试验类型Experimental types 处理Treatments 基础培养基Basal medium NAA(mg/L) 吲哚丁酸IBA(mg/L) 吲哚乙酸IAA(mg/L) AC(%)
正交试验L9(34) 1 MS 0 0 0
Orthogonal experiments 2 MS 0.01 0.1 0.1
3 MS 0.05 0.2 0.2
4 1/2 MS 0 0.1 0.2
5 1/2 MS 0.01 0.2 0
6 1/2 MS 0.05 0 0.1
7 1/4 MS 0 0.2 0.1
8 1/4 MS 0.01 0 0.2
9 1/4 MS 0.05 0.1 0
对比试验 10 MS 0 0 0 0.1
Comparative experiments 11 MS 0.01 0.1 0.1 0.1
12 MS 0.05 0.2 0.2 0.1
13 1/2 MS 0 0.1 0.2 0.1
14 1/2 MS 0.01 0.2 0 0.1
15 1/2 MS 0.05 0 0.1 0.1
16 1/4 MS 0 0.2 0.1 0.1
17 1/4 MS 0.01 0 0.2 0.1
18 1/4 MS 0.05 0.1 0 0.1

Table 3

Sterilization effects of strawberry tip-shoot explants %"

指标Index 0.15% HgCl2 0.20% HgCl2
2~3min 4~5min 6~7min 8~9min 10~11min 2~3min 4~5min 6~7min 8~9min 10~11min
细菌污染率Bacteria contamination rates 80.13 55.00 48.75 38.12 25.00 72.50 52.54 43.61 36.84 23.24
死亡率Death rates 0 0 10.00 12.26 21.32 0 5.00 11.83 13.45 22.67

Table 4

Effects of treatments on strawberry proliferation and differentiation"

处理Treatments 植物形态
Plant morphology
芽的量(%)
Percent of buds
幼苗的量(%)
Percent of seedlings
增殖分化情况
Proliferation and differentiation
增殖系数
Proliferation coefficients
1
丛芽(芽块)或幼苗
6.69~31.25
68.75~93.31
生长势较好、健壮、无愈伤组织、深绿、无玻璃化、无黄化、幼苗个体形态较好 22.00±2.34b
2
丛芽(芽块)或幼苗
81.23~95.27
4.73~18.77
生长势较好、健壮、无愈伤组织、深绿、无玻璃化、无黄化、幼苗个体形态较差 25.70±1.54a
3
芽块(愈伤组织)或幼苗
61.32~78.47
21.53~38.68
生长势较好、健壮、深绿、无玻璃化、无黄化、愈伤组织偏多或大量 10.40±1.00c
4
芽块(愈伤组织)或幼苗
90.80~100.00
0~9.20
生长势一般、大部分绿色、少量黄化、玻璃化、愈伤组织中度 4.40±0.34d
5
芽块(愈伤组织)或幼苗
60.00~83.33
16.67~40.00
生长势一般、大部分绿色、少量黄化、玻璃化、愈伤组织偏多或大量 5.70±0.45d
6
丛芽(芽块)或幼苗
60.00~66.68
33.32~40.00
生长势一般、大部分绿色、少量黄化、少量玻璃化、无或少许愈伤组织 9.50±0.83cd
7
芽块(愈伤组织)或幼苗
81.82~100.00
0~18.18
生长势较差、大部分浅绿色、少量黄化、略玻璃化、愈伤组织大量 6.70±0.62d
8
丛芽(芽块)或幼苗
95.00~100.00
0~5.00
生长势较差、大部分黄色(黄化现象突出)、少量褐色、无玻璃化、无愈伤组织 11.30±1.63c
9

芽块(愈伤组织)

100.00

0

生长势较差、黄色或褐色、质量较差(小、紧密、硬)、玻璃化和黄化现象突出、死亡现象明显、愈伤组织偏多或大量 9.00±0.54cd

Table 5

Effects of treatments on strawberry growth and rhizogenesis in rooting culture"

处理Treatments 株高Plant height (cm) 叶片数Leaf number 根长Root length (cm) 根粗Root diameter (mm) 生根量Root number
1 2.34±0.13b 6.90±0.59bc 2.75±0.22a 0.19±0.02a 6.80±0.95bc
2 2.38±0.14ab 7.90±0.62ab 2.47±0.23ab 0.17±0.03ab 7.40±0.22bc
3 1.53±0.13c 5.30±0.47c 1.14±0.09d 0.14±0.01b 6.30±0.60bc
4 2.04±0.13bc 6.30±0.21c 1.67±0.11c 0.12±0.01bc 7.40±0.78bc
5 2.28±0.17b 6.80±0.33bc 1.55±0.13cd 0.10±0.01c 9.60±0.75a
6 2.48±0.23ab 7.10±0.28bc 1.84±0.17bc 0.11±0.01bc 9.50±0.96a
7 2.63±0.27ab 7.40±0.40bc 1.90±0.16bc 0.12±0.01bc 10.70±0.60a
8 2.70±0.29ab 6.50±0.34bc 2.75±0.33a 0.17±0.03ab 7.40±0.85bc
9 2.86±0.19a 6.40±0.31c 2.25±0.19ab 0.14±0.02b 7.80±0.53b
10 1.66±0.16c 7.90±0.38ab 0.95±0.10d 0.07±0.01c 5.90±0.43c
11 2.16±0.19bc 9.00±0.58a 2.01±0.30bc 0.10±0.01c 3.80±0.59d
12 2.16±0.13bc 7.70±0.54b 1.14±0.20d 0.08±0.01c 4.60±0.40cd
13 2.19±0.23b 8.90±0.60ab 1.87±0.18bc 0.09±0.01c 4.30±0.30cd
14 2.75±0.20ab 8.10±0.64ab 2.21±0.14b 0.09±0.01c 6.30±0.54bc
15 2.66±0.14ab 8.60±0.58ab 2.11±0.11bc 0.09±0.01c 3.60±0.52d
16 2.84±0.21ab 8.10±0.35ab 2.62±0.15ab 0.09±0.02c 4.00±0.33d
17 2.75±0.09ab 8.10±0.41ab 2.18±0.30bc 0.08±0.01c 4.60±0.70cd
18 2.70±0.24ab 8.20±0.51ab 2.46±0.12ab 0.10±0.01c 4.90±0.46cd

Table 6

Effects of treatments on strawberry rhizogenesis and plant growth vigour in rooting culture"

处理
Treatments
根发生的部位Rhizogenesis site 植株生长势Plant growth vigour
1 基部(无愈伤组织) 较好:健壮、叶片较大、深绿、无玻璃化、无黄化
2 基部(无或少许愈伤组织) 较好:健壮、叶片较大、深绿、无玻璃化、无黄化
3 基部(无愈伤组织)或基部愈伤组织(中度) 较好:健壮、叶片较大、深绿、无玻璃化、无黄化
4 基部(无愈伤组织)或基部愈伤组织(少许或少量或中度) 一般:茎叶硬度一般、叶片大小一般、叶绿、无玻璃化、无黄化
5
基部(无愈伤组织)或基部愈伤组织(中度)
一般:茎叶硬度一般、叶片大小一般、叶绿、少许植株略玻璃化、无黄化
6 基部(无愈伤组织)或基部愈伤组织(偏多) 一般:茎叶硬度一般、叶片大小一般、叶绿、无玻璃化、无黄化
7 基部(无愈伤组织)或基部愈伤组织(少许或中度或偏多) 较差:茎叶较柔软、叶片较小、无玻璃化、略偏黄
8 基部(无愈伤组织)或基部愈伤组织(中度或偏多) 较差:茎叶较柔软、叶片较小、略玻璃化、略偏黄
9 基部(无愈伤组织)或基部愈伤组织(偏多或大量) 较差:茎叶较柔软、叶片较小、略玻璃化、略偏黄
10 基部(无愈伤组织)或叶柄处(或茎部)的绒毛状愈伤组织(少许) 一般:茎叶硬度一般、叶片大小一般、叶绿、无玻璃化、略偏黄
11 基部(无或少许愈伤组织)或叶柄处(或茎部)的绒毛状愈伤组织(少许) 一般:茎叶硬度一般、叶片大小一般、叶绿、略玻璃化或黄化
12 基部(无或少许愈伤组织)或叶柄处的绒毛状愈伤组织(少许) 一般:茎叶硬度一般、叶片大小一般、无玻璃化、略偏黄
13 基部(无或少许愈伤组织)或叶柄处的绒毛状愈伤组织(少许) 一般:茎叶硬度一般、叶片大小一般、略玻璃化或黄化
14 基部(无或少许愈伤组织)或叶柄处(或茎部)的绒毛状愈伤组织(少许) 一般:茎叶硬度一般、叶片大小一般、无玻璃化、略偏黄
15 基部(无或少许愈伤组织)或叶柄处(或茎部)的绒毛状愈伤组织(少许) 一般:茎叶硬度一般、叶片大小一般、无玻璃化、略偏黄
16 基部(无或少许愈伤组织)或叶柄处的绒毛状愈伤组织(少许) 较差:茎叶特别柔软、叶片较小、略玻璃化、偏黄
17 基部(无或少许愈伤组织)或叶柄处的绒毛状愈伤组织(少许) 较差:茎叶特别柔软、叶片较小、略玻璃化、偏黄
18 基部(无或少许愈伤组织)或叶柄处(或茎部)的绒毛状愈伤组织(中度) 较差:茎叶特别柔软、叶片较小、略玻璃化、偏黄
[1] 黄文江, 潘超, 阚显照 , 等. “红丰”草莓无菌系及叶盘再生系统的建立. 西南农业学报, 2010,23(5):1640-1643.
[2] 叶正文 . 中外草莓产业发展趋势. 柑桔与亚热带果树信息, 2005,21(4):5-7.
[3] 顾地周, 朱俊义, 冯颖 , 等. 草莓试管内诱导匍匐茎和高温处理结合茎尖培养脱毒技术研究. 西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2010,11(38):89-94.
[4] 张伟 . 草毒组培苗和自留苗生产性状比较. 中国农业气象, 2007,28(增):167-168.
[5] 钟灼仔, 陈文胜, 高绍良 , 等.5个草莓品种组培苗与常规苗栽培性状对比.农业科技通讯,2010(6):84-88.
[6] 王蓉, 马瑛, 苗璐 , 等. 草莓组培快繁技术的研究. 新疆农业科学, 2005,42(增):113-114.
[7] 牟彤, 吴瑕, 胡鑫宇 . 不同激素条件对草莓组培苗快繁的影响. 安徽农学通报, 2010, 16(5): 78-167.
[8] 王振磊, 闫芬芬, 王静 , 等.草莓组培快繁技术研究.北方园艺,2012(11):130-132.
[9] 李慧 . 草莓茎尖离体培养研究. 贵州农业科学, 2004,32(2):10-11.
[10] 陈爱萍, 叶祖云, 缪雄平 . 草莓茎尖组织培养研究. 宁德师专学报(自然科学版), 1998,10(1):58-60.
[11] 翟婷婷, 刘成连, 原永宾 , 等. 草莓茎尖培养快繁体系的研究. 安徽农业大学学报, 2015,42(4):545-548.
[12] 王晓云, 张晓申, 赵海红 , 等.草莓茎尖组培快繁技术研究.农业科技通讯,2014(12):124-125.
[13] 潘超, 黄文江, 张小平 , 等. 草莓的组织培养与快速繁殖研究. 生物学杂志, 2005,22(2):27-29.
[14] 蔡坤秀, 林秀香, 陈振东 , 等. 不同培养基对叶底红增殖系数的影响. 中国农学通报, 2010,26(22):256-258.
[1] Zhibo Zhou,Yake Yi,Guanghui Chen. Effects of Sowing Amount, Medium and Chemical Treatment on Seedling Quality and Yield of High Quality Late-Rice Variety of Yuzhenxiang [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(2): 129-135.
[2] Yan Xu,Shaolong Zhang,Yuhua Chen,Hui Li. Establisment of Highly Effective in Vitro Regeneration System of Dioscorea alata L. [J]. Crops, 2017, 33(6): 60-64.
[3] Yanli Lu,Hongyou Zhou,Xiaoyu Zhang. Optimization of Virus-Free of Shoot Tip and Virus Detection of Test-Tube Plantlet of Potato [J]. Crops, 2017, 33(1): 161-167.
[4] Xiaoliang Li,Junyun Zhang,Zhong Zhang,Chunfu Dong,Shixian Yang,Wenzhi Wang,Jiankang Zhang. Study on Technology of Rapid Propagation in Tissue Culture of Cut Rose Hongchun [J]. Crops, 2016, 32(6): 58-66.
[5] Hui Li,Geng Zhang,Yijiang Meng,Shujun Ge. Establishment of Virus-Elimination and Rapid Propagation System of Pinellia pedatisecta Schott [J]. Crops, 2016, 32(3): 51-57.
[6] Liguo Chang,Huiling Fan,Jianchao Liu,Shengwen Bai,Hongyu Cheng,Huaqing Li. Strengthening and Rooting of Slender Potato Test-Tube Plantlet [J]. Crops, 2016, 32(2): 129-132.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] Guangcai Zhao,Xuhong Chang,Demei Wang,Zhiqiang Tao,Yanjie Wang,Yushuang Yang,Yingjie Zhu. General Situation and Development of Wheat Production[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 1 -7 .
[2] Baoquan Quan,Dongmei Bai,Yuexia Tian,Yunyun Xue. Effects of Different Leaf-Peg Ratio on Photosynthesis and Yield of Peanut[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 102 -105 .
[3] Xuefang Huang,Mingjing Huang,Huatao Liu,Cong Zhao,Juanling Wang. Effects of Annual Precipitation and Population Density on Tiller-Earing and Yield of Zhangzagu 5 under Film Mulching and Hole Sowing[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 106 -113 .
[4] Wenhui Huang, Hui Wang, Desheng Mei. Research Progress on Lodging Resistance of Crops[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 13 -19 .
[5] Yun Zhao,Cailong Xu,Xu Yang,Suzhen Li,Jing Zhou,Jicun Li,Tianfu Han,Cunxiang Wu. Effects of Sowing Methods on Seedling Stand and Production Profit of Summer Soybean under Wheat-Soybean System[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 114 -120 .
[6] Mei Lu,Min Sun,Aixia Ren,Miaomiao Lei,Lingzhu Xue,Zhiqiang Gao. Effects of Spraying Foliar Fertilizers on Dryland Wheat Growth and the Correlation with Yield Formation[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 121 -125 .
[7] Xiaofei Wang,Haijun Xu,Mengqiao Guo,Yu Xiao,Xinyu Cheng,Shuxia Liu,Xiangjun Guan,Yaokun Wu,Weihua Zhao,Guojiang Wei. Effects of Sowing Date, Density and Fertilizer Utilization Rate on the Yield of Oilseed Perilla frutescens in Cold Area[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 126 -130 .
[8] Pengjin Zhu,Xinhua Pang,Chun Liang,Qinliang Tan,Lin Yan,Quanguang Zhou,Kewei Ou. Effects of Cold Stress on Reactive Oxygen Metabolism and Antioxidant Enzyme Activities of Sugarcane Seedlings[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 131 -137 .
[9] Jie Gao,Qingfeng Li,Qiu Peng,Xiaoyan Jiao,Jinsong Wang. Effects of Different Nutrient Combinations on Plant Production and Nitrogen, Phosphorus and Potassium Utilization Characteristics in Waxy Sorghum[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 138 -142 .
[10] Na Shang,Zhongxu Yang,Qiuzhi Li,Huihui Yin,Shihong Wang,Haitao Li,Tong Li,Han Zhang. Response of Cotton with Vegetative Branches to Plant Density in the Western of Shandong Province[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 143 -148 .