Crops ›› 2017, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (3): 44-48.doi: 10.16035/j.issn.1001-7283.2017.03.009

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Evaluation of Adaptability of Different Vegetable Soybean Cultivars (Lines) in Chifeng Area

Zhou Xuechao1,Ding Surong1,Wei Yunshan1,Zhou Yanfang1,Wei Xue2,Na Rina1,Li Feng1   

  1. 1 Chifeng Academy of Agricultural and Animal Husbandry Sciences/Chifeng Comprehensive Experimental Station,Nation Soybean Industrial Technology System,Chifeng 024031,Inner Mongolia,China
    2 Chifeng Meteorological Service,Chifeng 024031,Inner Mongolia,China
  • Received:2017-03-15 Revised:2017-04-06 Online:2017-06-15 Published:2018-08-26

RichHTML

5

PDF (PC)

128

Abstract:

This study investigated and evaluated the agronomic characters, fresh pod related characters, yield characters, growth stages and appearance quality, taste quality of the 11 vegetable soybean cultivars (lines) in Chifeng area of Inner Mongolia. The results showed that among the tested 11 cultivars (lines), there were 2 lines could not mature in Chifeng region, the rest 9 cultivars (lines) had a good adaptability to local environment based on their agronomic characters. The principal component analysis was applied to the 14 characters of all the 9 cultivars (lines) and the contribution rate of four principal component factors reached to 88.7%. Maodou 6 had the highest principal component score and integrated score among all tested cultivars (lines). Under comprehensive evaluation and screening of our results Maodou 6, Zhexiandou 8, Maodou 8 and H0992 were suitable for cultivation in Chifeng area.

Key words: Vegetable soybean, Varieties (lines), Principal component analysis, Adaptation

Table 1

Growth period and agronomic characters performance of different vegetable soybean varieties (lines)"

品种
Variety		 采摘期(月-日)
Harvest time		 成熟期(月-日)
Maturity date		 采摘生育期(d)
Picking period		 生育期(d)
Growth period		 株高(cm)
Plant height		 底荚高度(cm)
Bottom pods height		 主茎节数(节)
Stem node number		 分枝数(个)
No.of branches
3D099 9-18 9-26 113a 121b 78.6c 2.2d 19.0a 5.5ab
浙鲜8号Zhexian 8 9-18 10-02 112a 127a 73.3d 2.0de 14.7c 3.7cd
H0922 9-06 9-15 101b 110c 57.1f 6.1a 13.0d 2.5e
H503 9-18 10-03 113a 128a 63.5e 3.7bc 16.0b 3.5d
浙鲜9号Zhexian 9 9-02 9-13 97c 108d 55.3g 3.6c 13.5c 4.0cd
39002-30-1 9-22 10-02 115a 127a 90.1a 3.8b 16.9c 4.6bc
毛豆6号Maodou 6 8-24 9-09 96d 104e 39.5b 1.9de 11.0e 5.8a
毛豆8号Maodou 8 8-20 9-09 84e 104e 32.1h 1.4f 11.0e 4.0cd
早毛豆Zaomaodou 8-18 9-02 84f 98f 32.4h 1.7ef 13.0d 5.0b

Table 2

Yield characters performance of different vegetable soybean varieties (lines)"

品种
Variety
 单株1粒荚数(个)
One seed pods per plant		 单株多粒荚数(个)
Multiple
pods per plant		 单株总荚数(个)
Pods per plant		 多粒荚比例(%)
Multiple pods ratio		 标准荚(cm)
The standard of fresh pod		 单株
粒数(粒)
Seeds per
plant		 单株鲜
荚重(g)
Pod fresh
weight
per plant		 鲜百粒重(g)
100-seeds fresh weight		 鲜荚产量(kg/hm2)
Pod fresh weigh		 口感评价
Taste evaluation
荚长
Pod length		 荚宽
Pod width
3D099 5.5e 38.0b 43.5d 86.36b 4.89ef 1.35bc 93.5b 104.4d 70.0c 11 458.5c A
浙鲜8号Zhexian 8 15.4b 29.0e 44.4d 65.32f 5.95c 1.52ab 75.6d 122.8b 79.5a 13 678.5a A
H0922 6.8d 31.6d 38.4e 81.89c 5.32e 1.31c 81.7c 112.6c 67.9d 13 359.0b A
H503 2.5f 32.3d 35.6f 91.72a 5.62d 1.57a 79.1cd 83.1e 61.6e 11 056.5d A
浙鲜9号Zhexian 9 17.7a 16.9g 34.6f 48.84g 6.03c 1.37bc 53.7f 59.9f 65.9d 8 695.5g B
39002-30-1 10.3c 24.7f 35f 70.57e 6.45b 1.59a 62.3e 99.5d 68.9c 10 944.0d B
毛豆6号Maodou 6 18.2a 36.0bc 54.2b 66.42f 6.62a 1.58a 103.2a 129.7a 73.4b 11 800.5c A
毛豆8号Maodou 8 14.6b 42.0a 56.6a 74.20d 4.68f 1.37bc 94.0b 107.8d 69.3d 10 075.5f A
早毛豆Zaomaodou 14.6b 34.2c 48.8c 70.08e 5.04e 1.26c 104.2a 113.2c 63.0e 10 608.0e B

Table 3

Principal component analysis for characters of different vegetable soybean varieties (lines)"

项目
Item		 主成份Principal component
1 2 3 4
总特征值Total eigen values 5.777 3.172 2.107 1.357
贡献率Variance (%) 41.261 22.660 15.048 9.694
累计贡献率Cumulative (%) 41.261 63.921 78.969 88.662
株高Plant height -0.787 0.380 0.298 -0.188
底荚高度Bottom pods height -0.640 -0.310 0.295 0.126
主茎节数Stem node number -0.388 0.730 -0.044 -0.290
分枝数No.of branches 0.514 0.525 0.184 -0.583
单株1粒荚数One seed pods per plant 0.367 0.172 -0.880 -0.158
单株多粒荚数Multiple pods per plant 0.759 0.198 0.478 0.260
单株总荚数Pods per plant 0.920 0.291 -0.169 0.124
单株荚重Weight per plant 0.727 0.521 0.118 0.343
单株粒数Seeds per plant 0.936 -0.021 0.128 0.253
鲜百粒重100-seed fresh weight 0.014 0.925 -0.258 -0.157
荚长Pod length -0.581 0.210 -0.649 0.412
荚宽Pod width -0.620 0.371 -0.249 0.522
单位面积产量Yield per unit 0.083 0.700 0.411 0.353
生育期Growth period -0.802 0.412 0.339 0.031

Table 4

Principal component score and comprehensive score of the major characters of different vegetable soybean varieties (lines)"

品种
Variety		 主成分因子得分 Principal component factor score 综合得分
Comprehensive score		 等级
Grade
F1 F2 F3 F4
3D099 0.069 1.088 -0.765 -1.333 0.034 6
浙鲜8号Zhexian 8 0.253 1.893 0.227 0.197 0.662 2
H0922 0.223 -0.240 1.202 -0.107 0.235 4
H503 -0.166 -1.119 -1.481 0.672 -0.541 8
浙鲜9号Zhexian 9 -2.249 -0.268 1.140 -0.153 -0.937 9
39002-30-1 -0.694 0.297 -0.446 0.875 -0.227 7
毛豆6号Maodou 6 1.113 0.108 1.068 1.682 0.910 1
毛豆8号Maodou 8 0.837 -0.559 0.828 -1.375 0.236 3
早毛豆Zaomaodou 0.613 -1.200 0.633 -0.459 0.036 5
[1] 盖钧镒, 王明军, 陈长之 . 中国毛豆生产的历史渊源与发展. 大豆科学, 2002,21(1):7-12.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-9841.2002.01.002
[2] 韩天富, 盖钧镒 . 世界菜用大豆生产、贸易和研究的进展. 大豆科学, 2002,21(4):278-284.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-9841.2002.04.009
[3] 顾卫红, 郑洪建, 张燕 , 等. 菜用大豆的国际需求及科研生产动态(综述). 上海农业学报, 2002,18(2):45-48.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-3924.2002.02.011
[4] 陈学珍, 谢皓, 李婷婷 , 等. 我国菜用大豆研究进展与生产利用现状. 北京农学院学报, 2003,18(4):311-315.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-3186.2003.04.019
[5] 张秋英, 杨文月, 李艳华 , 等. 中国菜用大豆研究现状、生产中的问题及展望. 大豆科学, 2007,26(6):950-954.
[6] 马海林, 樊智翔, 刘学义 , 等. 山西鲜食大豆产业发展现状及展望. 山西农业科学, 2005,33(2):17-19.
[7] 罗瑞萍, 赵志刚, 连金番 , 等. 宁夏引黄灌区鲜食大豆农艺及产量性状分析.作物杂志, 2016(2):68-72.
[8] 程艳波, 江炳志, 曹亚琴 , 等. 不同来源菜用大豆品种适应性的评价. 中国农学通报, 2012,28(4):151-156.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6850.2012.04.028
[9] 林海明, 张文霖 . 主成分分析与因子分析的异同和SPSS软件—兼与刘玉玫、卢纹岱等同志商榷.统计研究, 2005(3):65-69.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1002-4565.2005.03.015
[10] 郑元梅, 黄建成, 童川拉 . 台湾菜用大豆生产与贸易概况.台湾农业情况, 1994(2):22-24 .
[11] 武天龙, 汤南, 赵则胜 , 等. 菜用大豆粒荚性状选择标准的研究. 大豆科学, 2000,19(2):184-187 .
[12] 李丽兰 . 2012 年菜用大豆新品种引种比较试验. 种子世界, 2012(10):13.
[13] 陈四龙, 李玉荣, 程增书 , 等 .花生品种(系)生物学性状的主成分分析和聚类分析. 花生学报, 2007,36(2):28-34.
[14] 葛长军, 徐丽荣, 闫良 , 等. 鲜食大豆品种比较试验研究初报. 陕西农业科学, 2015,61(8):13-15.
[15] 庄萍萍, 李伟, 魏育明 , 等. 波斯小麦农艺性状相关性及主成分分析. 麦类作物学报, 2006,26(4):11-14.
doi: 10.7606/j.issn.1009-1041.2006.04.142
[16] 刘玉爱, 侯建华, 高志军 , 等. 玉米引种材料的主成分分析和聚类分析. 玉米科学, 2006,14(2):16-18.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-0906.2006.02.006
[17] 孔德伟, 陈德全, 周良强 , 等. 杂交水稻几个重要农艺及产量性状的主成分分析. 中国农学通报, 2005,21(8):117-119.
[18] 张玉革, 胡绪彬 . 基于主成分和聚类分析的大豆品种生物学性状的比较研究. 大豆科学, 2004,23(3):178-183.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-9841.2004.03.005
[19] 吕建珍, 马建萍, 独俊娥 , 等. 春播谷子品种(系)生态适应性鉴定及主成分分析.作物杂志, 2015(6):44-47.
doi: 10.16035/j.issn.1001-7283.2015.06.008
No related articles found!
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] Guangcai Zhao,Xuhong Chang,Demei Wang,Zhiqiang Tao,Yanjie Wang,Yushuang Yang,Yingjie Zhu. General Situation and Development of Wheat Production[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 1 -7 .
[2] Baoquan Quan,Dongmei Bai,Yuexia Tian,Yunyun Xue. Effects of Different Leaf-Peg Ratio on Photosynthesis and Yield of Peanut[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 102 -105 .
[3] Xuefang Huang,Mingjing Huang,Huatao Liu,Cong Zhao,Juanling Wang. Effects of Annual Precipitation and Population Density on Tiller-Earing and Yield of Zhangzagu 5 under Film Mulching and Hole Sowing[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 106 -113 .
[4] Wenhui Huang, Hui Wang, Desheng Mei. Research Progress on Lodging Resistance of Crops[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 13 -19 .
[5] Yun Zhao,Cailong Xu,Xu Yang,Suzhen Li,Jing Zhou,Jicun Li,Tianfu Han,Cunxiang Wu. Effects of Sowing Methods on Seedling Stand and Production Profit of Summer Soybean under Wheat-Soybean System[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 114 -120 .
[6] Mei Lu,Min Sun,Aixia Ren,Miaomiao Lei,Lingzhu Xue,Zhiqiang Gao. Effects of Spraying Foliar Fertilizers on Dryland Wheat Growth and the Correlation with Yield Formation[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 121 -125 .
[7] Xiaofei Wang,Haijun Xu,Mengqiao Guo,Yu Xiao,Xinyu Cheng,Shuxia Liu,Xiangjun Guan,Yaokun Wu,Weihua Zhao,Guojiang Wei. Effects of Sowing Date, Density and Fertilizer Utilization Rate on the Yield of Oilseed Perilla frutescens in Cold Area[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 126 -130 .
[8] Pengjin Zhu,Xinhua Pang,Chun Liang,Qinliang Tan,Lin Yan,Quanguang Zhou,Kewei Ou. Effects of Cold Stress on Reactive Oxygen Metabolism and Antioxidant Enzyme Activities of Sugarcane Seedlings[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 131 -137 .
[9] Jie Gao,Qingfeng Li,Qiu Peng,Xiaoyan Jiao,Jinsong Wang. Effects of Different Nutrient Combinations on Plant Production and Nitrogen, Phosphorus and Potassium Utilization Characteristics in Waxy Sorghum[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 138 -142 .
[10] Na Shang,Zhongxu Yang,Qiuzhi Li,Huihui Yin,Shihong Wang,Haitao Li,Tong Li,Han Zhang. Response of Cotton with Vegetative Branches to Plant Density in the Western of Shandong Province[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 143 -148 .