Crops ›› 2020, Vol. 36 ›› Issue (1): 136-140.doi: 10.16035/j.issn.1001-7283.2020.01.022

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Effects of Flower Juice Extracts of Gardenia and Magnolia on Chemical Components and Fragrance Substances Content of Flue-Cured Tobacco

Li Diqin1,Lu Zhengyan1,Wang Yan1,Zhong Yi1,Liu Minghui1,Wang Qing1,Jiang Xiangwei2,Lu Chao2,Ding Chunxia1()   

  1. 1College of Agronomy, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha 410128, Hunan, China
    2Jiahe County Tobacco Company of Hunan Province, Chenzhou 424500, Hunan, China
  • Received:2019-07-18 Revised:2019-11-09 Online:2020-02-15 Published:2020-02-23
  • Contact: Chunxia Ding E-mail:dcxxys@hunau.edu.cn

RichHTML

3

PDF (PC)

211

Abstract:

Using Xiangyan 5 as material, we explored the effect of the different concentrations of flower juice extracts of gardenia and magnolia on the relative content of main chemical components and fragrance substances of flue-cure tobacco by pot experiment. The results showed that: Spraying flower juice extracts of gardenia and magnolia was beneficial to the improvement of the main chemical components in tobacco leaves. Contrast with CK, reducing sugar of B2F and C3F was higher more than CK 15.0%-21.1% and 14.3%-17.7% in turn, potassium contents of B2F and C3F of spraying treatments was higher more than CK 5.70%-13.9% and 7.40%-14.0% in turn; total amount of fragrance substances of B2F such as petroleum ether extracts, carotenoid aroma, degradation products solanone, non-enzymatic browning reaction products, fragmentation products of aromatic amino acids, neophytadiene and neutral aroma components of spraying treatments increased by 10.0%-20.9%, 11.2%-20.9%, 9.6%-20.2%, 9.8%-21.1%, 10.8%-22.5%, 11.2%-23.0%, 14.9%-24.7% and 11.9%-22.1% in turn contrast with CK, and increased by 13.5%-24.1%, 11.3%-21.0%, 11.4%-20.0%, 10.8%-18.7%, 13.1%-21.2%, 10.1%-19.1%, 17.5%-27.0% and 18.1%-27.6% of C3F, and total weight score of sensory quality of tobacco leaves is better than that of the control. The optimum effect of gardenia and magnolia flower juice extracts on the main chemical components and fragrance substances of tobacco leaves was applied 3.5-5.0g/plant.

Key words: Tobacco, Chemical component, Aroma substances, Plant extracts

Fig.1

Chemical composition content of flue-cured tobacco B2F and C3F of different treatments Values followed by different small letters mean significant difference at 0.05 level, the same below"

Table 1

Sensory quality evaluation of tobacco leaves of different treatments"

处理
Treatment		 等级
Grade		 香气质
Aroma quality		 香气量
Aroma quantity		 杂气
Offensive odor		 浓度
Concentration		 刺激性
Stimulus		 劲头
Strength		 余味
Aftertaste		 权重总分
Total weight score
T1 上部橘黄 7.5 7.0 7.5 7.0 7.0 7.5 7.0 7.25
T2 二级 8.5 8.0 8.0 7.5 8.0 8.0 7.5 8.00
T3 （B2F） 8.0 7.5 8.0 7.5 8.5 8.5 7.5 7.89
T4 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.00
T1 中部橘黄 8.0 7.5 8.0 7.5 7.5 8.0 7.5 7.75
T2 三级 8.5 7.5 8.5 8.0 8.0 8.5 8.0 8.14
T3 （C3F） 8.0 7.5 8.5 8.0 7.5 8.5 8.0 8.00
T4 7.5 7.0 7.5 7.5 7.0 7.0 7.0 7.21

Fig.2

Total content of related determination substances of flue-cured tobacco B2F and C3F of different treatments"

[1] 尹光庭, 周冀衡, 王廷晓 , 等. 旱地和稻田烤烟的某些重要香气前体物比较分析. 福建农林大学学报(自然科学版), 2012,41(6):566-569.
[2] 谢新乔, 戴勋, 王毅 , 等. 有机初烤烟叶中性致香物质特征分析. 作物杂志,2013(2):70-74.
[3] 肖守斌, 卢竖格, 邓荣银 . 湘南烤烟植体色素及其降解产物含量与国外烤烟的比较. 作物杂志,2009(1):85-87.
[4] 李玲燕, 徐宜民, 刘百战 , 等. 不同生态区域烤烟烟叶香气物质分析. 中国烟草科学, 2015,36(3):1-7.
[5] 周冀衡, 王勇, 邵岩 , 等. 产烟国部分烟区烤烟质体色素及主要挥发性香气物质含量的比较. 湖南农业大学学报(自然科学版), 2005,31(2):128-132.
[6] 谭仲夏, 秦西云 . 烟叶主要化学指标与其感官质量的灰色关联分析. 广西民族大学学报(自然科学版), 2008,14(4):67-72.
[7] 李迪秦, 龚湛武, 李玉辉 , 等. 复合生物有机肥对烤烟光合生理特性及土壤微生物的影响. 中国农业科技导报, 2017,19(9):109-116.
[8] 李迪秦, 龚湛武, 陈一凡 , 等. 不同播种移栽期对烤烟产量与品质影响的多指标模糊评价. 核农学报, 2017,31(11):2258-2264.
[9] 孟庆华, 于川芳, 邱纪青 , 等. 烟用天然植物提取物专利技术统计分析. 烟草科技, 2013,317(12):59-63.
[10] 李玲燕, 徐宜民, 刘百战 , 等. 不同生态区域烤烟烟叶香气物质分析. 中国烟草科学, 2015,36(3):1-7.
[11] 李伟, 邓小华, 周清明 , 等. 基于模糊数学和GIS的湖南浓香型烤烟化学成分综合评价. 核农学报, 2015,29(5):946-953.
[12] 邓小华, 杨丽丽, 陆中山 , 等. 湘西烟叶质量风格特色感官评价. 中国烟草学报, 2013,19(5):22-27.
[13] 宋朝鹏, 武圣江, 高远 , 等. 烤烟密集烘烤变黄期类胡萝卜素及其降解香气成分的变化. 中国农业科学, 2010,43(20):4246-4254.
[14] 黎根, 毕庆文, 汪健 , 等. 烤烟主要化学成分与烟叶品质关系研究进展. 河北农业科学, 2007,11(6):6-9,41.
[15] 王育军, 周冀衡, 李强 , 等. 曲靖烟叶化学成分可用性及其对感官评吸质量的影响. 烟草科技,2014(11):67-73.
[16] 易建华, 彭新辉, 邓小华 , 等. 气候和土壤及其互作对湖南烤烟还原糖、烟碱和总氮含量的影响. 生态学报, 2010,30(16):4467-4475.
[17] 杨景全, 于国锋, 冯媛 , 等. 初烤烟叶颜色与常规化学成分及感官质量相关性研究. 江西农业学报, 2019,31(5):79-83.
[18] 黄平俊, 欧阳花, 易建华 , 等. 浏阳烟区不同年份烤烟主要化学成分的变异分析. 作物杂志,2008(6):30-33.
[19] 薛超群, 尹启生, 王信民 , 等. 烤烟烟叶香气质量与其常规化学成分的相关性. 烟草科技,2003(9):27-30.
[20] 鲁黎明, 朱靓, 雷强 , 等. 四川烤烟主产区烟叶感官质量及主要化学成分分析. 草业学报, 2012,21(4):88-97.
[21] 王春凯, 王英俊, 矫海楠 , 等. 不同采收成熟度烤后烟叶香气质量评价. 中国烟草科学, 2016,37(3):22-28.
[1] Lei Pan,Jie Xu,Shuai Yang,Yunsong Chen,Lianhong Chen,Wenguang Ma. Pollen Viability, Morphology and Physiological Indexes of Three Tobacco Varieties at Different Storage Temperatures [J]. Crops, 2020, 36(2): 112-118.
[2] Hongtao Shen,Fusheng Zhang,Dong Li,Jianhua Qiu,Xinghong Cai,Yubao Qin. Effects of Different Preceding Crops and Planting Density on Yield and Quality of Flue-Cured Tobacco in Mudanjiang [J]. Crops, 2020, 36(2): 105-111.
[3] Yue Chen,Hulin Li,Shimiao Zhu,Han Yan,Bin Lang,Wenxiu Ji. Isolation and Identification of IAA - Producing Rhizobacteria and Its Effects on Seed Germination and Seedling Growth of Tobacco [J]. Crops, 2020, 36(2): 176-181.
[4] Liu Meiju,Li Jiangzhou,Ji Sigui,Fan Miaomiao,Gu Xinghui,Zhang Limeng,Zhang Jinwei,Qu Xing,Zhou Wenbing,Lin Shan. Evaluation of Effect of Biochar on Tobacco Yield and Nitrogen Use Efficiency in Mountain Slope Areas [J]. Crops, 2020, 36(1): 89-97.
[5] Shuai Jingtong,Pei Xiaodong,Li Juan,Zhang Yiyang. Effects of Furrowing and Ridging Measures on the Quality of Tobacco-Planting Soils and Output Value of Flue-Cured Tobacco [J]. Crops, 2019, 35(6): 114-119.
[6] Xu Jie,Pan Lei,Yang Shuai,Chen Lianhong,Geng Shibing,Ma Wenguang. Research Progress of Tobacco Pollen Vitality [J]. Crops, 2019, 35(3): 10-14.
[7] Jiang Nan,Gong Zhanwu,Chen Lili,Hu Yajie,Wei Jianyu,Wang Shengcai,Li Diqin. Grey Correlation Analysis Between Soil Nutrients and Three Microorganisms after Application of Bacillus subtilis [J]. Crops, 2019, 35(3): 142-149.
[8] Xinqi Geng,Huijuan Yang,Yanqing Qin,Xingyou Yang,Shimin Zhao,Hongzhi Shi. Development and Application of Tobacco SSR Markers Based on Genome Re-Sequencing of Different Tobacco Types [J]. Crops, 2019, 35(2): 84-89.
[9] Deming Xiang,Mingfa Zhang,Shuguang Peng,Feng Tian,Jianxin Luo,Wu Chen,Yunfan Cai,Minghui Tian,Qisong Lü. Effects of Consecutive Applying Different New Type Fertilizers on Soil Fungal Communities and Tobacco Quality and Yield [J]. Crops, 2019, 35(2): 156-163.
[10] Xinling Yang,Qian Yao,Wenli Ping,Yiqiong Ma,Baolin Wang,Guotao Jia,Yongfeng Yang,Hong Cui. Screening of High Aroma Mutants from Progenies of EMS Mutagenized Flue-Cured Tobacco [J]. Crops, 2019, 35(1): 68-74.
[11] Fang Chen,Shixiao Xu,Xiaohui Li,Chao Liu,Jianfei Zhou,Yuan Wang,Pei Tian,Tiezhao Yang. Construction of Molecular Fingerprinting and Analysis of Genetic Diversity for 80 Tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum) Germplasms Based on SSR Markers [J]. Crops, 2019, 35(1): 22-31.
[12] Wang Ning,Zhang Jing,Huang Jinyong,Shi Tuansheng,Du Jian,Yue Caipeng. Effects of Exogenous Hydrogen Peroxide on Floral Bud Differentiation in Tobacco [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(6): 116-123.
[13] Yuan Wang,Ze Guo,Xiaohui Li,Shixiao Xu,Xuexia Xing,Siqi Zhang,Jia He,Chao Liu,Fang Chen,Tiezhao Yang. Effects of Meloidogyne incognita Infection on Tobacco Root System under Different Temperatures [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 161-166.
[14] Kailun Zhang,Shouming Chen,Hong Yin,Bin Li,Liangwen Xie,Fan He. and Antioxidant Activity of Tobacco Seedlings under Salt Stress [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(3): 123-128.
[15] Yaning Wang,Jinpeng Yang,Chunlei Yang,Fangsen Xu,Xiang Zhang,Liang Li. Effects of Well-Cellar Transplanting with Triangulation on Growth, Development,Yield and Quality of Burley Tobacco [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(3): 116-122.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] Menghan Wei, Huifang Xie, Lu Xing, Hui Song, Shujun Wang, Suying Wang, Haiping Liu, Nan Fu, Jinrong Liu. Comprehensive Evaluation of Yield and Agronomic Characters of Foxtail Millet Germplasms from North China[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 42 -47 .
[2] . [J]. Crops, 2012, 28(5): 76 -81 .
[3] . [J]. Crops, 1990, 6(2): 3 -5 .
[4] . [J]. Crops, 1995, 11(3): 11 .
[5] . [J]. Crops, 1994, 10(1): 3 -4 .
[6] . [J]. Crops, 1985, 1(3): 32 .
[7] . [J]. Crops, 1986, 2(2): 19 -20 .
[8] . [J]. Crops, 1992, 8(3): 35 -36 .
[9] . [J]. Crops, 1994, 10(4): 22 -23 .
[10] . [J]. Crops, 1994, 10(3): 30 .