Crops ›› 2018, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (3): 116-122.doi: 10.16035/j.issn.1001-7283.2018.03.018

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Effects of Well-Cellar Transplanting with Triangulation on Growth, Development,Yield and Quality of Burley Tobacco

Wang Yaning1,Yang Jinpeng2,Yang Chunlei2,Xu Fangsen3,Zhang Xiang1,Li Liang1   

  1. 1 Institute of Plant Nutrition and Resources and Environmental, Henan Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Zhengzhou 450002, Henan, China
    2 Tobacco Research Institute of Hubei Province, Wuhan 430030, Hubei, China
    3 Microelement Research Center of Huazhong Agriculture University, Wuhan 430070, Hubei, China
  • Received:2018-01-04 Revised:2018-03-07 Online:2018-06-20 Published:2018-06-20

RichHTML

3

PDF (PC)

148

Abstract:

The effects of well-cellar transplanting with triangulation on agronomic traits, photosynthetic rate, endogenous hormone concentration, chemical quality and economic yield of burley tobacco were compared through field experiments. The results showed that well-cellar transplanting with triangulation increased tobacco height, leaf area, effective leaf number and the photosynthetic rate in the growing period in the field experiment. The IAA concentration during the growth period were increased compared with CK, and the JA and ABA concentration was reduced at fast-growing and mature stage. Different cultivation models reduced the nicotine content in tobacco leaves, and increased the potassium and sugar content and the economic yield. Under the same situation, the analysis of interaction effect showed that transplanting method was the main factor influencing the yield and output value, and the contribution rate were 78.57% and 61.96%, respectively. Cultivation method was the main factor influencing the medium-superior tobacco rate, nicotine and potassium content, and the contribution rate were 68.62%, 62.10% and 54.74%, respectively. Transplanting and cultivation methods on medium-superior tobacco rate and potassium content had significant interaction effect and the contribution rate were 6.95% and 45.21%, respectively.

Key words: Burley tobacco, Well-cellar transplanting, Triangulation, Photosynthetic rate, Hormone, Yield and quality

Table 1

Effects of different cultivating patterns on agronomic traits of burley tobacco"

生育期
Growth stage		 处理
Treatment		 株高(cm)
Plant height		 茎围(cm)
Stem diameter		 最大叶面积(cm2)
Maximum leaf area		 单株叶片数
Leaves per plant
团棵期Rosette stage T1 25.60a 7.53a 707.87a 10.56a
T2 24.38a 7.35a 621.61b 10.45a
T3 20.39b 7.07a 608.95b 10.13a
CK 20.17b 7.00a 539.38c 10.10a
旺长期Vigorous growth stage T1 97.63a 10.73a 1 654.13a 17.33a
T2 83.17b 10.50a 1 503.72b 16.75ab
T3 84.83b 10.27a 1 477.79b 16.90ab
CK 79.33b 9.93a 1 347.58c 15.85b
成熟期Mature stage T1 118.33a 14.60a 2 227.82a 20.07a
T2 115.33a 14.30a 1 989.95b 19.77ab
T3 117.20a 14.13ab 1 907.52b 19.47b
CK 114.33a 13.60b 1 881.92b 18.93c

Table 2

Effects of different cultivating patterns on photosynthetic parameters of burley tobacco"

生育期Growth stage 部位Position 处理Treatment Pn [μmolCO2/(m2·s)] Gs [mmol/(m2·s)] Ci (μL/L) Tr [mmol H2O/(m2·s)]
团棵期Rosette stage 中部叶Middle leaves T1 19.12a 2.23a 309.17a 5.80a
T2 18.24ab 1.90b 312.69a 5.60a
T3 18.17ab 1.61c 318.72a 5.41a
CK 17.23b 1.48c 324.24a 5.17a
旺长期Vigorous growth stage 上部叶Upper leaves T1 19.66a 1.34a 302.99b 8.55a
T2 18.78a 1.26a 316.22a 8.06b
T3 18.92a 1.27a 306.32b 8.26ab
CK 17.79a 0.99b 318.83a 7.40c
中部叶Middle leaves T1 19.39a 1.13a 298.03a 7.88a
T2 18.13a 0.98a 309.64a 7.61a
T3 18.63a 1.11a 304.04a 7.73a
CK 16.73b 0.83b 314.81a 6.77b
下部叶Lower leaves T1 14.88a 0.77a 300.85a 6.98a
T2 13.06ab 0.59ab 309.56a 6.40a
T3 14.70a 0.69ab 307.82a 6.81a
CK 11.60b 0.53b 321.27a 5.04b
成熟期Mature stage 上部叶Upper leaves T1 16.76a 0.26a 193.38b 6.21a
T2 14.67a 0.23ab 205.76b 5.87a
T3 15.74a 0.23ab 196.73b 5.55a
CK 12.31b 0.20b 226.90a 4.34b
中部叶Middle leaves T1 14.72a 0.24a 204.30c 5.82a
T2 13.43a 0.21ab 229.51ab 5.66a
T3 14.12a 0.22a 209.07bc 5.49a
CK 11.48b 0.19b 234.73a 4.64b
下部叶Lower leaves T1 9.23a 0.14a 206.36b 4.11a
T2 8.15a 0.13ab 215.39b 3.80a
T3 9.19a 0.13ab 211.48b 3.97a
CK 5.50b 0.11b 241.91a 2.87b

Fig.1

Effects of different cultivating patterns on JA content of middle leaves of burley tobacco"

Fig.2

Effects of different cultivating patterns on ABA content of middle leaves of burley tobacco"

Fig.3

Effects of different cultivating patterns on IAA content of middle leaves of burley tobacco"

Table 3

Effects of different cultivating patterns on chemical composition content of burley tobacco %"

部位Position 处理Treatment 烟碱Nicotine 总氮Total nitrogen 总糖Total sugar 钾Potassium 氯 Chlorine
上部叶Upper leaves T1 3.39b 3.79a 0.57a 4.36a 1.04a
T2 3.89ab 3.64a 0.52a 3.92b 0.91a
T3 3.73ab 3.56a 0.50a 3.97b 0.94a
CK 4.27a 3.33a 0.47a 3.68b 0.86a
中部叶Middle leaves T1 3.13b 3.69a 0.64a 5.00a 1.16a
T2 3.65a 3.58a 0.60a 4.45b 1.05a
T3 3.52ab 3.50a 0.52ab 4.40b 1.13a
CK 3.70a 3.46a 0.43b 3.88c 0.96a

Table 4

Effects of different cultivating patterns on tobacco economic yield"

处理
Treatment		 产量(kg/hm2)
Yield		 产值(万元/hm2)
Output value (×104yuan/hm2)		 均价(元/kg)
Average price (yuan/kg)		 上中等烟率(%)
Rate of medium-superior tobacco
T1 2 085.99a 3.36a 16.10a 77.97a
T2 2 046.84ab 3.17b 15.47b 73.49b
T3 1 976.13b 3.11b 15.74b 76.14a
CK 1 882.93c 2.90c 15.40b 67.49c

Table 5

Analysis of variance test of different cultivating patterns on tobacco economic output and chemical composition content"

项目
Measurement		 变异来源
Source of variation		 平方和
Mean square		 自由度
df		 F值
F-value		 贡献率(%)
Contribution rate		 P值
P-value
产量Yield A 56 212.51 1 36.87 78.57 0.000
B 13 137.39 1 8.62 18.36 0.019
A×B 2 191.05 1 1.44 3.06 0.265
产值Output value A 0.20 1 116.31 61.96 0.000
B 0.12 1 71.20 37.93 0.000
A×B 0.00 1 0.20 0.11 0.666
上中等烟率Rate of medium-superior tobacco A 46.00 1 46.79 24.43 0.000
B 129.18 1 131.40 68.62 0.000
A×B 13.09 1 13.31 6.95 0.007
烟碱Nicotine A 0.15 1 2.64 24.08 0.143
B 0.37 1 6.81 62.10 0.031
A×B 0.08 1 1.52 13.82 0.253
钾Potassium (%) A 0.00 1 0.02 0.05 0.901
B 1.03 1 16.79 54.74 0.003
A×B 0.85 1 13.87 45.21 0.006
[1] 张炜,屠乃美,王可,等. 烤烟井窖式小苗移栽技术研究进展. 作物研究,2014,28(1):107-111.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-5280.2014.01.25
[2] 罗会斌,龙鹏臻,马键,等. 烤烟井窖式小苗移栽技术研究与应用. 贵州农业科学,2012,40(8):101-107.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-3601.2012.08.030
[3] 王峥嵘,刘毅,彭耀东,等. 不同移栽方式对烤烟产质量的影响. 江西农业学报,2015,27(11):31-34.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-8581.2015.11.008
[4] 刘国顺. 烟草栽培学. 北京:中国农业出版社,2003:70-77.
[5] 于会泳,高林,王毅,等. 烟草种植起垄高度与移栽深度的交互效应研究. 中国烟草科学,2012,33(2):82-85.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-5119.2012.02.017
[6] 谭建,廖勇,周健云,等. 不同起垄栽培方式对烤烟生长及效益的影响. 安徽农学通报,2009,15(10):144-145,170.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-7731.2009.10.081
[7] 陈宇,马均,童平,等. 氮肥运筹对大苗三角强化栽培水稻生理和产量的影响. 西南农业学报,2009,22(2):357-363.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-4829.2009.02.028
[8] 朱从桦,代邹,严奉君,等. 晒田强度和穗肥运筹对三角形强化栽培水稻光合生产力和氮素利用的影响. 作物学报,2013,39(4):735-743.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2013.00735
[9] 国家烟草专卖局. YC/T 142—2010烟草农艺性状调查测量方法.北京:中国标准出版社,2010.
[10] Liu H B,Li X H,Xiao J H,et al.A convenient method for simultaneous quantification of multiple phytohormones and metabolites:application in study of rice-bacterium interaction. Plant Methods,2012,8:2.
[11] 中华人民共和国国家标准. GB/T 8966—2005白肋烟. 北京:中国标准出版社,2005.
[12] 中华人民共和国烟草行业标准. YC/T 468—2013烟草及烟草制品总植物碱的测定—连续流动(硫氰酸钾)法 . 北京:中国标准出版社,2013.
[13] 李春丽,毛绍春. 烟叶化学成分及分析. 昆明:云南大学出版社,2007.
[14] 江力,王东胜,王能如,等. 6-苄基腺嘌呤和脱落酸对不同发育阶段烟草叶片光合功能及过氧化氢水平的调控. 中国烟草学报,2006(12):38-42.
doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1004-5708.2006.05.008
[15] 周玲,魏小春,郑群,等. 脱落酸与赤霉素对瓜尔豆叶片光合作用及内源激素的影响. 作物杂志,2010(1):15-20.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7283.2010.01.005
[16] 李梦莎,阎秀峰. 植物的环境信号分子茉莉酸及其生物学功能. 生态学报,2014,34(23):6779-6788.
doi: 10.5846/stxb201303090383
[17] Jiang Y,Liang G,Yang S,et al.Arabidopsis WRKY57 functions as a node of convergence for jasmonic acid- and auxin-mediated signaling in jasmonic acid-induced leaf senescence. Plant Cell,2014,26(1):230-245.
doi: 10.1105/tpc.113.117838
[18] 刘华山,陈平华,杨素勤,等. 茉莉酸对烤烟烟苗生长的影响. 中国烟草学报,2000(1):36-39.
[19] Shi Q,Li C,Zhang F S.Nicotine synthesis in Nicotiana tabacum L. induced by mechanical wounding is regulated by auxin. Journal of Experimental Botany,2006,57:2899-2907.
doi: 10.1007/s00284-007-9026-3 pmid: 16868042
[20] 陈睿,鲜小林. 不同温度和光强对高山杜鹃催花期内源激素的影响. 西南农业学报,2016,29(10):2341-2345.
[21] 刘述斌,李旭毅,许远明,等. 水稻三角形强化栽培与正方形强化栽培、抛秧栽培、常规栽培的比较研究. 中国农学通报,2012,28(21):38-45.
[22] 邱雪柏,高维常,陈伟,等. 井窖式移栽烟田温湿度对烟株前期生长发育的影响. 烟草科技,2015,48(7):20-24,35.
doi: 10.16135/j.issn1002-0861.20150704
[23] 陆志峰,鲁剑巍,潘勇辉,等. 钾素调控植物光合作用的生理机制. 植物生理学报,2016,52(12):1773-1784.
[24] 孙小花,谢亚萍,牛俊义,等. 不同供钾水平对胡麻花后干物质转运分配及钾肥利用效率的影响. 核农学报,2015,29(1):192-201.
doi: 10.11869/j.issn.100-8551.2015.01.0192
[25] Ma T L,Wu W H,Wang Y.Transcriptome analysis of rice root responses to potassium deficiency. BMC Plant Biology,2012,12:161-173.
doi: 10.1186/1471-2229-12-161 pmid: 22963580
[26] 陈昆,刘世琦,张自坤,等. 钾素营养对大蒜生长、光合特性及品质的影响. 植物营养与肥料学报,2011,17(2):506-512.
doi: 10.11674/zwyf.2011.0188
[1] Xiaoyong Zhang,Youlian Yang,Shujiang Li,Rongchuan Xiong,Hong Xiang. Effects of Exogenous GA3 and 6-BA on Leaf Senescence in Low Temperature Stress of Virus-Free Potato Cutting Seedlings [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 95-101.
[2] Chunming Zhang,Xueying Zhao,Hubin Yan,Huijun Zhu,Zeyan Zhang,Yaowen Zhang. Effects of Film Mulching Modes and Population Density on Photosynthesis Characteristics and Yield of Mung Bean in Arid Land [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(3): 108-115.
[3] Mingming Yan,Qiujun Chen,Min Tang,Zhiwen Liu. Effects of Different Concentration Combinations of Hormone and Organics on Rapid Propagation of Sweet Potato Virus-Free Seedling [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(2): 68-72.
[4] Weihai Hou,Jianlin Wang, ,Dan Hu. Comparison of Photosynthesis-Light Response Curve Fitting Model of Hulless Barley [J]. Crops, 2017, 33(4): 96-104.
[5] Qiang Hu,Baofeng Jin,Pufan Zheng,Fucai Chen,Sitong Li,Kailun Mao,Hailun Liu,Yonghong Tang,Lixin Zhang. Effects of Exogenous GA3 and IAA on Quality of Upper Leaves of Flue-Cured Tobacco in Southern Shaanxi Province [J]. Crops, 2016, 32(6): 135-141.
[6] Feng Wang,Juncang Qi,Lihao Lin,Xuguang Zheng,Yanan Guo,Lei Gong,Shaoyu Wang,Along Chen,Zhonghao Li,Ruijiao Song. Effects of Artificial Aging on Endogenous Hormones in the Endosperm of Barley Seeds during Early Germination [J]. Crops, 2016, 32(6): 160-167.
[7] Zhiwei Zhang,Xiaojing Li,Jinrui Bai,shuai Chen. Effects of CO2 on Cucumber Leaf Photosynthetic Rate and Stomatal Characters under High Temperature [J]. Crops, 2016, 32(5): 81-86.
[8] . [J]. Crops, 2013, 29(3): 96-99.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] Guangcai Zhao,Xuhong Chang,Demei Wang,Zhiqiang Tao,Yanjie Wang,Yushuang Yang,Yingjie Zhu. General Situation and Development of Wheat Production[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 1 -7 .
[2] Baoquan Quan,Dongmei Bai,Yuexia Tian,Yunyun Xue. Effects of Different Leaf-Peg Ratio on Photosynthesis and Yield of Peanut[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 102 -105 .
[3] Xuefang Huang,Mingjing Huang,Huatao Liu,Cong Zhao,Juanling Wang. Effects of Annual Precipitation and Population Density on Tiller-Earing and Yield of Zhangzagu 5 under Film Mulching and Hole Sowing[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 106 -113 .
[4] Wenhui Huang, Hui Wang, Desheng Mei. Research Progress on Lodging Resistance of Crops[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 13 -19 .
[5] Yun Zhao,Cailong Xu,Xu Yang,Suzhen Li,Jing Zhou,Jicun Li,Tianfu Han,Cunxiang Wu. Effects of Sowing Methods on Seedling Stand and Production Profit of Summer Soybean under Wheat-Soybean System[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 114 -120 .
[6] Mei Lu,Min Sun,Aixia Ren,Miaomiao Lei,Lingzhu Xue,Zhiqiang Gao. Effects of Spraying Foliar Fertilizers on Dryland Wheat Growth and the Correlation with Yield Formation[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 121 -125 .
[7] Xiaofei Wang,Haijun Xu,Mengqiao Guo,Yu Xiao,Xinyu Cheng,Shuxia Liu,Xiangjun Guan,Yaokun Wu,Weihua Zhao,Guojiang Wei. Effects of Sowing Date, Density and Fertilizer Utilization Rate on the Yield of Oilseed Perilla frutescens in Cold Area[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 126 -130 .
[8] Pengjin Zhu,Xinhua Pang,Chun Liang,Qinliang Tan,Lin Yan,Quanguang Zhou,Kewei Ou. Effects of Cold Stress on Reactive Oxygen Metabolism and Antioxidant Enzyme Activities of Sugarcane Seedlings[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 131 -137 .
[9] Jie Gao,Qingfeng Li,Qiu Peng,Xiaoyan Jiao,Jinsong Wang. Effects of Different Nutrient Combinations on Plant Production and Nitrogen, Phosphorus and Potassium Utilization Characteristics in Waxy Sorghum[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 138 -142 .
[10] Na Shang,Zhongxu Yang,Qiuzhi Li,Huihui Yin,Shihong Wang,Haitao Li,Tong Li,Han Zhang. Response of Cotton with Vegetative Branches to Plant Density in the Western of Shandong Province[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 143 -148 .