Crops ›› 2019, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (6): 114-119.doi: 10.16035/j.issn.1001-7283.2019.06.018

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Effects of Furrowing and Ridging Measures on the Quality of Tobacco-Planting Soils and Output Value of Flue-Cured Tobacco

Shuai Jingtong1,Pei Xiaodong2,Li Juan1,Zhang Yiyang1   

  1. 1Agronomy College, Hunan Agricultural University, Changsha 410128, Hunan, China
    2Changsha Branch of Hunan Tobacco Company, Changsha 410007, Hunan, China
  • Received:2019-06-03 Revised:2019-07-30 Online:2019-12-15 Published:2019-12-11
  • Contact: Yiyang Zhang

RichHTML

5

PDF (PC)

179

Abstract:

This study was to investigate the changes of soil chemical properties, tobacco plants growth and yield quality under the tobacco-rice rotation system. Two depths of furrow opening were designed, A1: shallow ditch (15cm gap between ridges), and A2: deep groove (25cm gap between ridges); Two ridging times were designed, B1: ridges were set up at 10 days before transplanting (conventional ridging), and B2: ridges were set up after tilling. Samples were taken in 2018, the effects of different treatments on soil pH, main nutrient content and tobacco agronomic characteristics, dry matter accumulation, and economic characteristics were systematically analyzed. The results showed that in A2B2, the effective leaves, maximum leaf length, maximum leaf width, and plant height were better than other treatments. The treatment could effectively increase soil available nutrient content, and soil pH was in the range of high-quality flue-cured tobacco production. At the same time, the tobacco plant had higher productive capacity, accumulating more dry matter which distributed reasonablely among various organs. The economic characteristics of flue-cured tobacco also showed that the yield, product value and exceptional tobacco ratio in A2B2 were higher, and the performance was better. In conclusion, ridge after tilling + deep ditch treatment (A2B2) is conducive to promote the growth of tobacco plants, to increase the tobacco plants quality, and to lay the biological foundation for producing fine quality leaves and rational yield in practice.

Key words: Flue-cured tobacco, Ditch depth, Ridge time, Soil chemical properties, Economic characteristics of tobacco

Table 1

Effects of different treatments on tobacco agronomic characters"

移栽后天数(d)
Days after transplanting		 处理
Treatment		 有效叶片数
Effective number of leaves		 最大叶长(cm)
Maximum leaf length		 最大叶宽(cm)
Maximum leaf width		 株高(cm)
Plant height		 最大叶面积(cm2)
Maximum leaf area
20 A1B1 5.4±0.7b 19.0±2.1b 8.7±2.0a 6.9±1.5b 105.3±26.5b
A1B2 6.0±0.6ab 23.9±2.9a 10.1±2.2a 8.8±2.5a 153.1±37.7a
A2B1 5.5±0.5b 24.0±2.2a 9.2±2.6a 9.1±2.0a 141.9±44.2a
A2B2 6.3±0.9a 20.9±2.6b 9.4±2.1a 9.0±1.1a 124.1±31.0a
40 A1B1 12.2±0.6a 50.9±3.7b 27.1±3.4b 37.7±3.3b 883.2±167.2b
A1B2 12.5±0.8a 56.6±3.6a 29.8±2.1a 44.4±6.4a 1 072.8±131.5a
A2B1 13.0±1.3a 55.5±2.7a 28.2±2.6ab 38.2±6.5b 994.4±123.6ab
A2B2 12.8±1.1a 55.7±2.8a 30.0±2.2a 44.0±5.6a 1 059.2±97.6a
60 A1B1 16.6±1.5b 64.3±2.0a 26.3±1.6ab 82.9±3.7b 1 070.1±65.1ab
A1B2 18.1±1.3a 65.0±1.5a 27.1±1.6ab 91.7±7.6a 1 116.7±78.9ab
A2B1 18.6±0.9a 64.4±1.8a 26.0±1.4b 88.0±5.7ab 1 064.3±73.2b
A2B2 18.9±1.4a 65.1±2.2a 27.5±1.4a 91.0±5.8a 1 135.9±86.1a
80 A1B1 13.4±0.8b 74.1±3.8a 24.8±2.0a 87.8±2.2b 1 167.2±95.1a
A1B2 12.7±0.8b 69.1±4.6b 24.2±1.6a 79.0±2.6c 1 062.4±91.3b
A2B1 14.5±0.7a 72.2±4.1ab 24.3±1.9a 88.0±3.7a 1 113.9±125.4ab
A2B2 14.8±0.8a 72.3±3.8ab 24.6±1.2a 79.4±6.5bc 1 129.1±60.0ab

Fig.1

Effects of different treatments on soil pH and organic matter Different lowercase letters indicate significant difference (P<0.05), the same below"

Fig.2

Effects of different treatments on soil nutrients"

Table 2

Effects of different treatments on dry matter accumulation in tobacco plant"

移栽后天数(d)
Days after
transplanting		 处理
Treatment		 根Root 茎Stem 叶Leaf 总干重(g)
Total dry weight
干重(g)
Dry weight		 比例(%)
Percentage		 干重(g)
Dry weight		 比例(%)
Percentage		 干重(g)
Dry weight		 比例(%)
Percentage
20 A1B1 1.22±0.1c 10.02±0.2b 2.99±0.5a 24.62±4.3a 7.93±0.6a 65.36±4.4a 12.14±0.4a
A1B2 1.89±0.1b 16.48±1.2a 2.65±0.4a 23.02±2.5a 6.95±0.2a 60.50±2.7ab 11.49±0.3ab
A2B1 1.78±0.1b 19.52±2.4a 2.06±0.6a 22.07±4.5a 5.36±0.4b 58.41±2.7b 9.20±1.0b
A2B2 2.23±0.3a 18.35±0.9a 2.72±1.0a 21.63±5.5a 7.27±0.8a 60.02±4.8ab 12.22±2.1a
40 A1B1 6.57±4.0a 14.82±5.8b 9.31±3.2b 22.04±6.1ab 26.34±5.4a 63.14±10.7a 42.21±10.1a
A1B2 11.05±3.4a 19.75±5.1ab 14.99±2.7a 26.99±3.4a 29.29±1.2a 53.26±6.4a 55.32±4.2a
A2B1 11.66±1.6a 24.58±1.4a 6.94±2.5b 14.65±5.7b 29.02±6.4a 60.77±6.9a 47.62±7.9a
A2B2 14.27±6.3a 23.17±5.3ab 11.47±3.1ab 19.53±4.2ab 33.75±6.5a 57.29±5.9a 59.48±14.0a
60 A1B1 32.92±3.7a 27.72±2.6bc 32.86±4.1a 27.34±4.5a 53.45±7.5a 44.94±4.6b 118.66±5.0a
A1B2 28.72±2.1a 22.75±2.1c 32.29±1.3a 26.02±1.6a 64.79±5.6a 51.23±3.5a 126.37±2.6a
A2B1 43.41±15.3a 34.22±3.3a 29.21±3.8a 24.13±3.8a 52.04±14.5a 41.65±0.6b 124.66±33.6a
A2B2 43.38±6.5a 32.60±2.4ab 30.38±5.7a 22.72±1.5a 59.22±5.3a 44.68±2.7b 132.97±16.0a
80 A1B1 92.19±0.8b 44.37±0.6a 39.00±2.5b 18.76±1.0a 76.60±1.9ab 36.86±0.6a 207.79±3.8b
A1B2 125.07±3.6ab 48.92±1.2a 46.40±2.5ab 18.14±0.6a 84.37±6.4ab 32.95±1.0b 255.84±11.6ab
A2B1 93.29±9.2b 45.51±5.3a 41.17±8.9ab 19.97±3.8a 70.93±5.4b 34.52±1.5ab 205.39±10.0b
A2B2 141.30±40.6a 49.99±4.9a 49.13±4.3a 17.84±2.0a 89.13±12.5a 32.18±2.0b 279.57±54.6a

Table 3

Effects of different treatments on economic characteristics of tobacco plant"

处理
Treatment		 产量(kg/666.7m2)
Yield		 产值(元/666.7m2)
Output value (yuan/666.7m2)		 均价(元/kg)
Average price (yuan/kg)		 上等烟比例(%)
Fine tobacco ratio		 上中等烟比例(%)
Super and medium tobacco ratio
A1B1 141.65±6.4a 3 909.04±29.2c 27.60±4.6a 76.49±8.1a 98.19±1.6a
A1B2 140.24±3.0a 3 944.77±59.5c 28.13±1.4a 80.85±12.8a 98.28±1.0a
A2B1 148.46±13.2a 4 055.58±32.3b 27.32±5.6a 67.72±7.7a 98.10±1.8a
A2B2 158.74±8.5a 4 465.98±49.2a 28.13±2.6a 73.17±3.3a 98.09±1.1a
[1] 武忠明 . 烟草种植制度及其技术保障措施. 农业与技术, 2018,38(14):11-12.
[2] 邓小华, 杨丽丽, 邹凯 , 等. 烟稻轮作模式下烤烟增密减氮的主要化学成分效应分析. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2017,23(4):153-159.
[3] 何春梅, 王飞, 钟少杰 , 等. 冷浸田土壤还原性有机酸动态及与水稻生长的关系. 福建农业学报, 2015,30(4):380-385.
[4] 王飞, 李清华, 林诚 , 等. 冷浸田水旱轮作对作物生产及土壤特性的影响. 应用生态学报, 2015,26(5):1469-1476.
[5] 刘如清, 欧细满, 谢良伍 , 等. 垄栽稻萍鱼技术研究与应用. 土壤肥料,2000(1):38-41.
[6] 王飞, 李清华, 余广兰 , 等. 开沟排渍与优化施肥对冷浸田生产力的耦合效应. 土壤通报, 2015,46(3):197-202.
[7] 安曈昕, 陈梦丽, 周锋 , 等. 玉米沟塘覆膜模式间作马铃薯产量效益研究. 作物杂志,2016(5):111-116.
[8] 王法宏, 杨洪宾, 徐成忠 , 等. 垄作栽培对小麦植株形态和产量性状的影响. 作物学报, 2007,33(6):172-174.
[9] 董稳军, 张仁陟, 黄旭 , 等. 明沟排水对冷浸田土壤理化性质及产量的影响. 灌溉排水学报, 2014,33(2):114-116.
[10] 王文军, 张祥明, 江小伟 . 垄作覆膜对冷浸田的改良效果研究. 中国农学通报, 2016,32(29):120-126.
[11] 林洪鑫, 刘光荣 . 冷浸田改良及其配套栽培技术研究进展. 江西农业学报, 2011,23(4):91-93.
[12] 孙艳军, 徐刚, 高文瑞 , 等. 不同畦沟深度对辣椒反季节栽培时土壤温度、水分和辣椒生长的影响. 江苏农业学报, 2014,30(6):241-245.
[13] 刘玉春, 刘连涛, 孙红春 , 等. 沟灌灌水量和沟深对棉花耗水量和水氮利用效率的影响. 节水灌溉,2015(8):26-31,34.
[14] 王思潮, 曹凑贵, 李成芳 , 等. 耕作模式对冷浸田水稻产量和土壤特性的影响. 中国生态农业学报, 2014,22(10):41-49.
[15] 赵海红, 王士强, 于铭 , 等. 高垄栽培对大豆根腐病防控效果的研究. 作物杂志,2015(5):156-159.
[16] 张冬梅, 黄学芳, 姜春霞 , 等. 冷凉区旱地玉米微垄覆膜土壤水热及产量效应研究. 作物杂志,2019(2):121-127.
[17] 刘杰, 罗尊长, 肖小平 , 等. 不同栽培和灌溉方式对冷浸田障碍因子及水稻产量的影响. 中国农学通报, 2014,30(30):158-162.
[18] 孟凡武, 崔志军, 崔方玲 , 等. 不同起垄时间对烟株长势及烟叶产质量的影响. 中国烟草科学,2005(3):23-24.
[19] 鲍士旦 . 土壤农化分析. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2000.
[20] 林玥, 郝嘉琪, 王维钰 , 等. 不同耕作措施对黄土高原区域大豆根际土壤微生物量、酶活性和养分的影响. 西北农业学报, 2019,28(4):128-138.
[21] 贾凤梅, 张淑花, 魏雅冬 . 不同耕作方式下玉米农田土壤养分及土壤微生物活性变化. 水土保持研究, 2018,25(5):112-117.
[22] 杨封科, 何宝林, 张国 , 等. 土壤培肥与覆膜垄作对土壤养分、玉米产量和水分利用效率的影响. 应用生态学报, 2019,30(3):893-905.
[23] 丁昆仑, Hann M J . 耕作措施对土壤特性及作物产量的影响. 农业工程学报, 2000,16(3):32-35.
[24] 李晓龙, 高聚林, 胡树平 , 等. 不同深耕方式对土壤三相比及玉米根系构型的影响. 干旱地区农业研究, 2015,33(4):7-13,35.
[25] 李轶冰, 逄焕成, 李华 , 等. 粉垄耕作对黄淮海北部春玉米籽粒灌浆及产量的影响. 中国农业科学, 2013,46(14):217-226.
[1] Jiang Nan,Gong Zhanwu,Chen Lili,Hu Yajie,Wei Jianyu,Wang Shengcai,Li Diqin. Grey Correlation Analysis Between Soil Nutrients and Three Microorganisms after Application of Bacillus subtilis [J]. Crops, 2019, 35(3): 142-149.
[2] Xinling Yang,Qian Yao,Wenli Ping,Yiqiong Ma,Baolin Wang,Guotao Jia,Yongfeng Yang,Hong Cui. Screening of High Aroma Mutants from Progenies of EMS Mutagenized Flue-Cured Tobacco [J]. Crops, 2019, 35(1): 68-74.
[3] Jie Xu,Lei Pan,Shuai Yang,Yunsong Chen,Shengbin Deng,Xiaodong Yang,Wenguang Ma. Analysis of Genetic Effects of Potassium Content in Flue-Cured Tobacco [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(2): 30-34.
[4] Siyu Gong,Sirong Zhong,Shichuan Zhang,Yaping Nie,Xihuan Liang,Shuaiqiang Yang,Qiyuan Liu. Effects of Biochar on Growth, Yield and Quality of Flue-Cured Tobacco [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(2): 154-160.
[5] Linjian Dai,Wu Chen,Tian Zhou,Jun Zhong. Selection Mutant of Resistant to Black Shank on Tobacco by Anther Culture [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(1): 66-70.
[6] Han Yan,Hanglin Song,Li Zhang,Jing Yan,Xianji Shi,Shimiao Zhu,Lu Liu,Hulin Li. Effects of Cadmium Stress on Agronomic Traits and Physiological and Biochemical Indexes of Flue-Cured Tobacco [J]. Crops, 2017, 33(5): 156-161.
[7] Qiang Hu,Baofeng Jin,Pufan Zheng,Fucai Chen,Sitong Li,Kailun Mao,Hailun Liu,Yonghong Tang,Lixin Zhang. Effects of Exogenous GA3 and IAA on Quality of Upper Leaves of Flue-Cured Tobacco in Southern Shaanxi Province [J]. Crops, 2016, 32(6): 135-141.
[8] Qingli Liu,Zhihong Li,Yanli Xu,Junying Li,Yungui Zhang. Research on the Cooperative Technology of Flue-Cured Tobacco based on Transplanting-Date, Fertilization and Variety in Yunnan [J]. Crops, 2016, 32(6): 128-134.
[9] . [J]. Crops, 2013, 29(3): 49-52.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] Wang Haitao,Liu Cunjing,Tang Liyuan,Zhang Sujun,Li Xinghe,Cai Xiao,Zhang Xiangyun,Zhang Jianhong. Status and Developmental Tendency of Hybrid Cotton in Hebei Province[J]. Crops, 2019, 35(5): 1 -8 .
[2] Huang Yufang,Ye Youliang,Zhao Yanan,Yue Songhua,Bai Hongbo,Wang Yang. Effects of Nitrogen Application Rates on Yield and Mineral Concentrations of Winter Wheat Grains in the North of Henan Province[J]. Crops, 2019, 35(5): 104 -108 .
[3] Li Song,Zhang Shicheng,Dong Yunwu,Shi Delin,Shi Yundong. Genetic Diversity Analysis of Rice Varieties in Tengchong, Yunnan Based on SSR Markers[J]. Crops, 2019, 35(5): 15 -21 .
[4] Hou Qian,Wang Wanxing,Li Guangcun,Xiong Xingyao. Advances in the Research on Potato Continuous Cropping Obstacles[J]. Crops, 2019, 35(6): 1 -7 .
[5] Cao Tingjie,Zhang Yu’e,Hu Weiguo,Yang Jian,Zhao Hong,Wang Xicheng,Zhou Yanjie,Zhao Qunyou,Li Huiqun. Detection of Three Dwarfing Genes in the New Wheat Cultivars (Lines) Developed in South Huang-Huai Valley and Its Association with Agronomic Traits[J]. Crops, 2019, 35(6): 14 -19 .
[6] Zhang Ting,Lu Lahu,Yang Bin,Yuan Kai,Zhang Wei,Shi Xiaofang. Comparative Analysis of Wheat Agronomic Traits in Four Provinces of Huanghuai Wheat Area[J]. Crops, 2019, 35(6): 20 -26 .
[7] Wang Yongxing,Shan Feibiao,Yan Wenzhi,Du Ruixia,Yang Qinfang,Liu Chunhui,Bai Lihua. Genetic Diversity Analysis and Code Classification Based on DUS Testing in Sunflower[J]. Crops, 2019, 35(5): 22 -27 .
[8] Shi Zhaokang,Zhao Zequn,Zhang Yuanhang,Xu Shiying,Wang Ning,Wang Weijie,Cheng Hao,Xing Guofang,Feng Wanjun. The Response and Cluster Analysis of Biomass Accumulation and Root Morphology of Maize Inbred Lines Seedlings to Two Nitrogen Application Levels[J]. Crops, 2019, 35(5): 28 -36 .
[9] Zhang Zhongwei,Yang Hailong,Fu Jun,Xie Wenjin,Feng Guang. Genetic Analysis of the Kernel Length of Maize with Mixed Model of Major Gene Plus Polygene[J]. Crops, 2019, 35(5): 37 -40 .
[10] Zhang Yongfang,Qian Xiaona,Wang Runmei,Shi Pengqing,Yang Rong. Identification of Drought Resistance of Different Soybean Materials and Screening of Drought Tolerant Varieties[J]. Crops, 2019, 35(5): 41 -45 .