Crops ›› 2022, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (1): 50-55.doi: 10.16035/j.issn.1001-7283.2022.01.007

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Genetic Diversity Analysis of Phenotypic Characteristics of Kenaf Resources in Zhejiang Province

Li Wenlue(), Chen Changli, Luo Xiahong, Liu Tingting, An Xia(), Jin Guanrong, Zhu Guanlin   

  1. Zhejiang Institute of Landscape Plants and Flowers, Zhejiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences (Zhejiang Xiaoshan Institute of Cotton and Bast Fiber Crops), Hangzhou 311251, Zhejiang, China
  • Received:2021-03-04 Revised:2021-04-26 Online:2022-02-15 Published:2022-02-16
  • Contact: An Xia E-mail:kobe1924@163.com;anxia@zaas.ac.cn

RichHTML

6

PDF (PC)

200

Abstract:

In order to fully gain knowledge and effectively make use of the collected kenaf resources, 22 kenaf germplasms collected from Zhejiang province were systematically investigated and analyzed based on 16 yield and quality characteristics. The results showed that there was great variation among 22 Zhejiang kenaf resources, and the coefficient variation ranged from 3.49%-20.10%, and the largest coefficient variation was fibre strength. Principal component analysis indicated that the first three principal components were individual yield factor, population yield factor, fibre quality factor, which provided 80.753% information of original characters. The total of 22 Zhejiang kenaf resources could be divided into three categories while euclidean distance was 10, among which the first group was high-yield type, and the second group was high fibre strength. Subordinate function analysis showed that Zhe 1-96, Hangyou 1, ZHKX-01 and Zhe 4438 in the the first group had the potential of breeding high-yield germplasm.

Key words: Kenaf, Phenotypic characters, Genetic diversity, Principal component analysis, Cluster analysis

Table 1

The tested kenaf varieties (lines) and their origins"

编号
Code		 品种（系）
Variety (line)		 来源
Origin		 编号
Code		 品种（系）
Variety (line)		 来源
Origin
1 浙1-96 杭州市 12 浙38-2 杭州市
2 浙江2号 杭州市 13 浙367 杭州市
3 浙832 杭州市 14 浙45 杭州市
4 浙4438 杭州市 15 浙119 杭州市
5 浙431 杭州市 16 浙3039 杭州市
6 浙83-24 杭州市 17 浙3010 杭州市
7 浙241 杭州市 18 向阳1号 杭州市
8 浙8310 杭州市 19 航优1号 杭州市
9 浙83-13 杭州市 20 浙萧麻1号 杭州市
10 浙83-15 杭州市 21 ZH-01 杭州市
11 浙3091 杭州市 22 ZHKX-01 杭州市

Table 2

Descriptive statistics of the characters of Zhejiang kenaf resources"

性状
Trait		 最大值
Max.		 最小值
Min.		 极差
Range		 平均值
Mean		 标准差
Standard deviation		 变异系数
Coefficient of variation (%)
株高Plant height (cm) 402.93 346.00 56.93 377.64 13.18 3.49
茎粗Stem diameter (mm) 18.87 15.02 3.85 17.19 0.99 5.74
鲜皮厚Fresh bark thickness (mm) 1.22 0.89 0.33 1.05 0.09 8.22
单株鲜茎重Fresh stem weight per plant (g) 550.50 316.00 234.50 451.05 60.10 13.33
单株鲜皮重Fresh bark weight per plant (g) 257.00 147.75 109.25 209.85 28.83 13.74
单株干皮重Dry bark weight per plant (g) 49.50 28.50 21.00 40.97 5.31 12.96
单株纤维重Fibre weight per plant (g) 27.04 15.55 11.49 21.56 2.80 12.99
鲜茎干皮率Dry bark to fresh stem (%) 9.93 8.39 1.55 9.10 0.42 4.57
干皮精洗率Fibre ratio to dry bark (%) 57.30 48.21 9.09 52.69 2.14 4.07
单株鲜重Fresh weight per plant (g) 630.25 351.25 279.00 517.23 70.98 13.72
干皮产量Yield of dry bark (g) 8.28 4.17 4.11 6.37 1.04 16.39
精麻产量Yield of fibre (t/hm2) 4.52 2.23 2.29 3.36 0.56 16.58
生物量Biological yield (t/hm2) 25.98 12.75 13.23 19.62 3.42 17.45
有效株数Effective plant number (×104/hm2) 18.17 11.84 6.33 15.38 1.58 10.26
纤维支数Fibre count (g/m) 259.00 226.00 33.00 239.14 8.80 3.68
纤维强力Fibre strength (N) 452.00 205.00 247.00 273.82 55.02 20.10

Table 3

The component matrix and eigenvalues of the first three principal components in principal component analysis of Zhejiang kenaf resources"

性状
Trait		 主成分Principal component
1 2 3
单株鲜茎重Fresh stem weight per plant 0.983 0.095 0.068
单株鲜重Fresh weight per plant 0.983 0.075 0.015
单株鲜皮重Fresh bark weight per plant 0.980 0.005 0.074
单株干皮重Dry bark weight per plant 0.945 0.206 -0.110
单株纤维重Fibre weight per plant 0.924 0.220 0.094
茎粗Stem diameter 0.929 0.058 0.073
生物量Biological yield 0.650 0.746 -0.013
鲜皮厚Fresh bark thickness 0.838 -0.013 -0.028
精麻产量Yield of fibre 0.639 0.730 0.063
干皮产量Yield of dry bark 0.659 0.732 -0.100
株高Plant height 0.370 0.684 0.484
有效株数Effective plant number -0.222 0.884 0.013
纤维强力Fibre strength 0.063 0.099 0.760
纤维支数Fibre count -0.163 0.388 0.476
干皮精洗率Fibre ratio to dry bark -0.104 0.038 0.695
鲜茎干皮率Dry bark to fresh stem -0.274 0.300 -0.580
特征值Eigenvalue 8.543 2.604 1.774
贡献率Contribution rate (%) 53.391 16.273 11.089
累计贡献率
Cumulative contribution rate (%)		 53.391
69.664
80.753

Fig.1

Cluster diagram of Zhejiang kenaf resources based on yield and quality characteristics"

Table 4

The main characters of three group resources"

性状
Trait		 Ⅰ(n=72.7%) Ⅱ(n=4.6%) Ⅲ (n=22.7%)
平均值Average 范围Range 平均值Average 范围Range 平均值Average 范围Range
株高Plant height (cm) 380.41 359.35~402.93 382.05 – 367.88 346.00~385.95
茎粗Stem diameter (mm) 17.66 16.74~18.87 17.17 – 15.69 15.02~16.06
鲜皮厚Fresh bark thickness (mm) 1.09 1.00~1.22 0.98 – 0.94 0.89~0.98
单株鲜茎重Fresh stem weight per plant (g) 480.95 431.25~550.50 432.25 – 359.10 316.00~381.25
单株鲜皮重Fresh bark weight per plant (g) 223.59 190.00~257.00 197.50 – 168.35 147.75~177.00
单株干皮重Dry bark weight per plant (g) 43.71 40.00~49.50 36.13 – 33.15 28.50~35.63
单株纤维重Fibre weight per plant (g) 22.91 21.03~27.04 20.25 – 17.53 15.55~19.14
鲜茎干皮率Dry bark to fresh stem (%) 9.09 8.39~9.93 8.39 – 9.30 9.04~9.68
干皮精洗率Fibre ratio to dry bark (%) 52.40 48.21~57.30 56.05 – 52.94 49.18~54.55
单株鲜重Fresh weight per plant (g) 553.41 511.25~630.25 483.50 – 408.20 351.25~431.75
干皮产量Yield of dry bark (g) 6.82 5.54~8.28 5.30 – 5.18 4.17~6.07
精麻产量Yield of fibre (t/hm2) 3.57 2.86~4.52 2.97 – 2.74 2.23~3.26
生物量Biological yield (t/hm2) 21.08 17.77~25.98 16.56 – 15.57 12.75~17.85
有效株数Effective plant number (×104/hm2) 15.37 11.84~18.17 14.57 – 15.56 12.30~17.12
纤维支数Fibre count (g/m) 239.25 226.00~251.00 242.00 – 238.20 226.00~259.00
纤维强力Fibre strength (N) 271.44 212.00~329.00 452.00 – 245.80 205.00~331.00

Table 5

The subordinate function analysis of 16 characteristics in Zhejiang kenaf resources"

品种（系）
Variety (line)		 PH SD FBT FSW FBW DBW FW1 DBFS FRD FW2 TDBW TFW TBY EN FC FS 平均
Average		 排序
Ranking
1 0.956 1.000 0.864 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000 0.349 0.705 1.000 1.000 1.000 0.948 0.698 0.455 0.259 0.827 1
2 0.712 0.813 0.560 0.855 0.826 0.875 0.829 0.384 0.581 0.861 0.908 0.871 0.925 0.706 0.030 0.170 0.682 3
3 0.527 0.581 0.565 0.732 0.728 0.750 0.504 0.392 0.000 0.731 0.539 0.370 0.491 0.352 0.636 0.255 0.510 16
4 0.682 0.598 0.688 0.559 0.611 0.548 0.642 0.345 1.000 0.573 0.525 0.609 0.629 0.572 0.606 0.445 0.602 5
5 0.437 0.445 0.620 0.587 0.465 0.792 0.754 0.984 0.599 0.645 0.453 0.439 0.439 0.228 0.636 0.328 0.553 8
6 0.437 0.619 0.357 0.617 0.572 0.613 0.563 0.324 0.549 0.642 0.561 0.530 0.544 0.597 0.667 0.028 0.514 14
7 0.602 0.746 0.881 0.909 0.938 0.869 0.751 0.244 0.386 0.961 0.333 0.277 0.379 0.000 0.394 0.283 0.560 7
8 0.563 0.773 0.807 0.677 0.753 0.738 0.651 0.534 0.454 0.680 0.652 0.591 0.525 0.488 0.000 0.470 0.585 6
9 0.459 0.937 0.544 0.765 0.785 0.637 0.584 0.002 0.542 0.760 0.547 0.515 0.518 0.503 0.121 0.283 0.531 12
10 0.633 0.556 0.286 0.496 0.455 0.363 0.409 0.000 0.862 0.474 0.275 0.323 0.288 0.430 0.485 1.000 0.459 17
11 0.670 0.643 0.622 0.672 0.725 0.589 0.492 0.150 0.400 0.673 0.495 0.430 0.445 0.527 0.303 0.352 0.512 15
12 0.550 0.601 0.447 0.752 0.744 0.720 0.592 0.298 0.332 0.764 0.597 0.507 0.601 0.519 0.424 0.105 0.535 11
13 0.235 0.616 1.000 0.612 0.636 0.601 0.482 0.378 0.338 0.599 0.703 0.606 0.604 0.830 0.303 0.065 0.538 10
14 0.202 0.269 0.107 0.224 0.217 0.262 0.102 0.534 0.106 0.246 0.205 0.102 0.165 0.490 0.182 0.000 0.213 21
15 0.668 0.551 0.631 0.562 0.487 0.607 0.554 0.579 0.540 0.593 0.591 0.556 0.567 0.602 0.364 0.154 0.538 9
16 0.378 0.838 0.407 0.636 0.616 0.690 0.554 0.643 0.302 0.691 0.580 0.484 0.559 0.462 0.303 0.235 0.524 13
17 0.473 0.188 0.268 0.278 0.256 0.339 0.312 0.711 0.605 0.245 0.463 0.450 0.337 0.710 0.061 0.126 0.364 19
18 0.000 0.201 0.276 0.180 0.268 0.268 0.236 0.837 0.582 0.289 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.072 0.000 0.073 0.205 22
19 1.000 0.620 0.560 0.827 0.835 0.893 0.819 0.639 0.506 0.832 0.953 0.890 1.000 0.833 0.758 0.368 0.771 2
20 0.702 0.208 0.170 0.237 0.201 0.238 0.215 0.421 0.611 0.242 0.381 0.372 0.385 0.833 1.000 0.510 0.420 18
21 0.544 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.000 0.431 0.697 0.000 0.183 0.198 0.179 0.834 0.606 0.117 0.237 20
22 0.797 0.577 0.393 0.491 0.387 0.667 0.477 1.000 0.139 0.587 0.865 0.694 0.906 1.000 0.424 0.502 0.619 4
[1] 粟建光, 戴志刚. 红麻种质资源描述规范和数据标准. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2005.
[2] 刘倩, 戴志刚, 陈基权, 等. 应用SRAP分子标记构建红麻种质资源分子身份证. 中国农业科学, 2013, 46(10):1974-1983.
[3] 程舟, 鲛岛一彦, 陈家宽. 日本的红麻研究、开发和应用. 中国麻业, 2001, 23(3):16-24.
[4] 陶爱芬, 祁建民, 林培青, 等. 红麻优异种质产量和品质性状主成分聚类分析与综合评价. 中国农业科学, 2008, 41(9):2859-2867.
[5] Cheng Z, Yoshito O, Kazuhiko S, et al. Selection of plant population of kenaf (Hibiscus cannabinus L.) as a papermaking raw material on arid hillside land in China. Journal of Wood Science, 1998, 44(4):296-302.
doi: 10.1007/BF00581310
[6] Khristova P, Kordachia O, Patt R, et al. Alkaline pulping with additives of kenaf from Sudan. Industrial Crops and Products, 2002, 15(3):229-235.
doi: 10.1016/S0926-6690(01)00118-2
[7] 徐建堂, 祁建民, 陶爱芬, 等. 福建省黄红麻遗传育种与综合利用发展研究报告. 海峡科学, 2016(1):128-136.
[8] 国家麻类麻类产业技术体系. 中国现代农业产业可持续发展战略研究麻类分册. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2017:72-73.
[9] 李祖士. 浙江的麻类作物生产、品种演变和品种资源征集. 中国麻作, 1996, 18(3):13-16.
[10] 祁建民, 方平平, 吴建梅, 等. 我国黄麻红麻科技创新与产业发展的战略思考. 中国麻业科学, 2006, 28(6):277-281.
[11] 陶向新. 模糊数学在农业科学中的初步应用. 沈阳农学院学报, 1982(2):96-107.
[12] 孙铭, 符开欣, 范彦, 等. 15份多花黑麦草优良引进种质的表型变异分析. 植物遗传资源学报, 2016, 17(4):655-662.
[13] 粟建光, 戴志刚, 杨泽茂, 等. 麻类作物特色资源的创新与利用. 植物遗传资源学报, 2019, 20(1):11-19.
[14] 粟建光, 戴志刚, 龚友才, 等. 我国红麻种质资源的遗传多样性与评价利用. 中国麻业, 2004, 26(1):5-9.
[15] 陶爱芬, 祁建民, 李爱青, 等. 红麻优异种质资源遗传多样性与亲缘关系的ISSR分析. 作物学报, 2005, 31(12):1668-1671.
[16] Cheng Z, Lu B R, Sameshima K, et al. Identification and genetic relationships of kenaf (Hibiscus cannabinus L.) germplasm revealed by AFLP analysis. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution, 2004, 51(4):393-401.
doi: 10.1023/B:GRES.0000023454.96401.1c
[17] 张加强, 金关荣, 骆霞虹, 等. 红麻品种（系）表型性状的因子和聚类分析. 植物遗传资源学报, 2016, 17(6):1000-1007.
[18] 程舟, 鲛岛一彦, 陈家宽. 红麻种质资源遗传变异和亲缘关系的RAPD分析. 中国麻业, 2002, 24(1):1-12.
[19] Xu J, Li A, Wang X, et al. Genetic diversity and phylogenetic relationship of kenaf (Hibiscus cannabinus L.) accessions evaluated by SRAP and ISSR. Biochemical Systematics and Ecology, 2013(49):94-100.
[20] 林荔辉, 汪斌, 陶爱芬, 等. 用ISSR标记分析红麻种质资源的遗传多样性. 武汉植物学研究, 2008, 26(3):240-244.
[21] Pratik S M, Karan C S, Kar A K, et al. Assessment of molecular diversity and evolutionary relationship of kenaf (Hibiscus cannabinus L.), roselle (H. sabdariffa L.) and their wild relatives. Plant Systematics and Evolution, 2013, 299(3):619-629.
doi: 10.1007/s00606-012-0748-8
[22] 兴旺, 崔平, 潘荣, 等. 不同国家甜菜种质资源遗传多样性研究. 植物遗传资源学报, 2018, 19(1):76-86.
[23] 洪建基, 祁建民, 王晓飞, 等. 红麻产量与品质性状的相关及其主成分分析. 福建农林大学学报(自然科学版), 2008, 37(6):561-564.
[1] Duan Yajuan, Cao Shiliang, Yu Tao, Li Wenyue, Yang Gengbin, Wang Chengbo, Liu Baomin, Liu Changhua. Identification of Salt Tolerance during Germination of Maize Inbred Lines [J]. Crops, 2022, 38(1): 213-219.
[2] Gao Zhanning, Wang Shujie, Feng Hui, Xue Zhenggang, Yang Yongqian, Song Xiaopeng, Jie Yuanfen. Comprehensive Evaluation of Two-Rowed Barley Varieties (Lines) [J]. Crops, 2022, 38(1): 70-76.
[3] Liu Xin, Yang Fang, Deng Junbo, Wang Aiai, He Nian, Chen Yan. Phenotypic Analysis and Comprehensive Evaluation of Soybean Strains in Jianghan Plain of China [J]. Crops, 2021, 37(5): 57-63.
[4] Qi Xiaolei, Li Xingfeng, Lü Guangde, Wang Ruixia, Wang Jun, Sun Xianyin, Sun Yingying, Chen Yongjun, Qian Zhaoguo, Wu Ke. Genetic Analysis of Taishan/Taikemai Serial Wheat Based on SNP Molecular Markers [J]. Crops, 2021, 37(5): 64-71.
[5] Tang Hongqin, Li Zhongyi, Dong Wenbin, Wei Caihui, He Tieguang, Meng Yancheng, Tang Hailing, Mo Yongcheng. Effects of Different Intercropping Modes of Green Manure Replacing Chemical Fertilizer on Cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz) Traits and Yield [J]. Crops, 2021, 37(4): 184-190.
[6] Zhang Quanfang, Jiang Mingsong, Chen Feng, Zhu Wenyin, Zhou Xuebiao, Yang Lianqun, Xu Jiandi. Analysis of Genetic Diversity of Rice Varieties (Lines) in Shandong Province [J]. Crops, 2021, 37(4): 26-31.
[7] Du Xiaoyu, Li Nannan, Zou Shaokui, Wang Lina, Lü Yongjun, Zhang Qian, Li Shuncheng, Yang Guangyu, Han Yulin. Comprehensive Analysis of Main Traits of Newly Bred Wheat Varieties (Lines) in Southern Huang-Huai Region [J]. Crops, 2021, 37(4): 38-45.
[8] Li Qiong, Chang Shihao, Wu Tingting, Geng Zhen, Yang Qingchun, Shu Wentao, Li Jinhua, Zhang Donghui, Zhang Baoliang. Analysis of Genetic Diversity and Genetic Relationship for 120 Soybean Germplasms [J]. Crops, 2021, 37(4): 51-58.
[9] Jia Ruiling, Zhao Xiaoqin, Nan Ming, Chen Fu, Liu Yanming, Wei Liping, Liu Junxiu, Ma Ning. Genetic Diversity Analysis and Comprehensive Assessment of Agronomic Traits of 64 Tartary Buckwheat Germplasms [J]. Crops, 2021, 37(3): 19-27.
[10] Zhou Yuexia, Fan Yu, Ruan Jingjun, Yan Jun, Lai Dili, Peng Yan, Tang Yong, Weng Wenfeng, Cheng Jianping. Correlation Analysis of Oat Grain Nutrition and Agronomic Traits [J]. Crops, 2021, 37(2): 165-172.
[11] Bai Wei, Hu Yang, Yang Sumei, Zhang Baoying, Cui Jinli, Jin Tao, Bai Haihua. Analysis on Agronomic Characteristics of Confectionery Sunflower Local Resources in Northwest Hebei [J]. Crops, 2021, 37(1): 54-59.
[12] Yang Wanjun, Pan Xiangyu, Wang Xiuhua, Wang Lu, Zhao Yan. Genetic Diversity Analysis of Yield and Agronomic Traits of 119 Alfalfa Varieties (Lines) [J]. Crops, 2020, 36(6): 17-22.
[13] Gao Jie, Feng Guangcai, Li Xiaorong, Li Qingfeng, Peng Qiu. Phenotypic Diversity and Clustering Analysis of Sorghum Germplasm Resources in Different Regions of Guizhou Province [J]. Crops, 2020, 36(6): 54-60.
[14] Yang Xuele, Zhang Lu, Li Zhiqing, He Luqiu. Diversity Analysis of Tartary Buckwheat Germplasms Based on Phenotypic Traits [J]. Crops, 2020, 36(5): 53-58.
[15] Gong Yanlong, Lei Yue, Yan Zhiqiang, Liu Xuewei, Zhang Dashuang, Wu Jianqiang, Zhu Susong. Comprehensive Evaluation of Phenotype Genetic Diversity in Japonica Rice Germplasm Resources in Different Ecological Zones [J]. Crops, 2020, 36(5): 71-79.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!