Crops ›› 2022, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (4): 77-82.doi: 10.16035/j.issn.1001-7283.2022.04.011

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Analysis of Agronomic Characteristics of Different Cassava Varieties (Lines) and Screening of High-Yielding Varieties (Lines)

Xiao Mingkun1(), Liu Guanghua2(), Song Jiming1, Liu Qian1, Duan Chunfang1,3, Jiang Tailing1, Zhang Linhui1,3, Yan Wei1, Shen Shaobin1, Zhou Yingchun1, Xiong Xiankun1, Luo Xin1, Bai Lina1, Li Yuexian1()   

  1. 1Tropical and Subtropical Cash Crops Research Institute, Yunnan Academy of Agricultural Sciences,Baoshan 678000, Yunnan, China
    2Biotechnology and Genetic Germplasm Resource Research Institute,Yunnan Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Kunming 650205, Yunnan, China
    3Baoshan Quanxin Agricultural Science and Technology Co., Ltd., Baoshan 678000, Yunnan, China
  • Received:2021-05-11 Revised:2021-07-03 Online:2022-08-15 Published:2022-08-22
  • Contact: Liu Guanghua,Li Yuexian E-mail:530066351@qq.com;rjslgh@vip.126.com;liyuexian2008@126.com

RichHTML

8

PDF (PC)

188

Abstract:

In order to explore the main factors affecting the yield of cassava, and screen high-yielding cassava varieties (lines), nine main agronomic traits of ten cassava varieties (lines) were compared and analyzed by using principal component analysis. The results showed that the agronomic traits of ten cassava varieties (lines) had significant differences (P < 0.05) except deciduous height and root thick (P > 0.05). The agronomic traits of SC9, SC124 and 58-7 had great variation. Among agronomic traits, the variation coefficients of yield per plant, aboveground fresh weight, number of fresh tubers and stem diameter were the largest. The number of fresh tubers, root length and thick were the key influencing factors of yield per plant. Two principal components were extracted by principal component analysis, and the cumulative variance contribution rate reached 88.1%, which reflected the basic information of agronomic traits. Among them, the number of fresh tubers was the dominant variable of the first principal component, and root length was the dominant variable of the second principal component. Among the ten cassava varieties (lines), SG-9 had the highest comprehensive score, GMT and SC9 had obvious yield advantages and could be used as planting and extension varieties.

Key words: Cassava, Agronomic characteristics, Correlation analysis, Principal component analysis, Cluster analysis, Screening

Table 1

Overview and source of experimental materials"

品种（系）
Variety (line)		 来源
Source
277 中国热带农业科学院环境与植物保护研究所
43-3 中国热带农业科学院热带生物技术研究所
58-7 中国热带农业科学院热带生物技术研究所
GMT 中国热带农业科学院热带生物技术研究所
GR891 广西壮族自治区亚热带作物研究所
SC-1 云南省农业科学院热带亚热带经济作物研究所
SC124 中国热带农业科学院热带作物品种资源研究所
SC205 中国热带农业科学院热带作物品种资源研究所
SC9 中国热带农业科学院热带作物品种资源研究所
SG-9 云南省农业科学院热带亚热带经济作物研究所

Table 2

Comparison of agronomic traits of cassava of different varieties (lines)"

品种（系）
Variety (line)		 株高Plant height (cm) 主茎粗Stem diameter (mm) 第1分枝高First branch height (cm)
M±SD CV (%) M±SD CV (%) M±SD CV (%)
277 213.43±44.65ab 20.92 25.93±7.93a 30.60 102.20±24.58abc 24.05
43-3 209.10±55.63ab 26.60 24.97±9.11a 36.47 92.73±33.62bc 36.26
58-7 218.80±59.16ab 27.04 25.59±9.64a 37.69 98.17±40.20abc 40.95
GMT 224.23±45.10a 20.11 23.84±13.05ab 54.74 109.70±37.37ab 34.07
GR891 235.10±51.10a 21.73 25.86±8.81a 34.08 101.57±34.84abc 34.30
SC-1 223.43±59.49a 26.62 26.54±8.94a 33.69 107.37±37.38ab 34.82
SC124 227.67±58.98a 25.91 26.63±9.15a 34.35 103.17±39.74abc 38.51
SC205 212.47±60.36ab 28.41 24.71±9.37ab 37.93 92.87±39.44bc 42.46
SC9 201.93±61.99b 30.70 24.12±9.46ab 39.24 86.80±37.89c 43.65
SG-9 231.03±69.68a 30.16 23.65±4.71b 19.92 115.30±39.61a 34.36
平均Average － 25.82 － 35.87 － 36.34
品种（系）
Variety (line)		 株高Plant height (cm) 主茎粗Stem diameter (mm) 第1分枝高First branch height (cm)
M±SD CV (%) M±SD CV (%) M±SD CV (%)
平均Average － 25.82 － 35.87 － 36.34
277 146.93±49.71a 33.83 2.35±1.06b 45.11 5.50±2.33ab 42.36
43-3 139.90±58.60a 41.89 2.85±1.79ab 62.95 5.67±3.00ab 52.87
58-7 145.10±66.39a 45.75 2.99±2.57ab 86.09 5.97±3.98ab 66.63
GMT 154.87±63.40a 40.93 2.83±2.06ab 72.69 6.80±4.37a 64.21
GR891 147.47±59.13a 40.10 2.93±1.65ab 56.18 6.03±2.75ab 45.57
SC-1 152.90±63.31a 41.41 3.51±2.08a 59.29 5.93±3.11ab 52.39
SC124 148.60±64.46a 43.38 3.21±2.01ab 62.62 6.23±3.76ab 60.30
SC205 142.27±63.81a 44.85 2.72±1.81ab 66.51 5.50±3.09ab 56.24
SC9 129.90±65.12a 50.13 2.13±1.77b 82.91 4.83±3.08b 63.66
SG-9 154.33±61.65a 39.95 2.42±1.58ab 65.41 5.67±2.50ab 44.02
平均Average 42.22 65.98 54.83
品种（系）
Variety (line)		 株高Plant height (cm) 主茎粗Stem diameter (mm) 第1分枝高First branch height (cm)
M±SD CV (%) M±SD CV (%) M±SD CV (%)
277 31.13±10.23b 32.87 37.53±8.09a 21.57 1.89±0.90ab 47.57
43-3 29.43±6.96b 23.65 36.56±9.68a 26.47 1.72±0.97b 56.57
58-7 34.43±12.29ab 35.70 37.19±9.76a 26.25 2.22±1.87ab 84.19
GMT 38.87±14.52a 37.37 35.27±14.63a 41.49 2.67±1.96a 73.56
GR891 29.30±9.00b 30.72 37.46±9.40a 25.10 1.71±1.17b 68.42
SC-1 31.10±9.39b 30.18 38.13±9.83a 25.77 1.89±1.43ab 75.87
SC124 33.90±14.58ab 43.01 38.23±9.82a 25.69 2.17±2.00ab 92.17
SC205 31.20±6.76b 21.66 36.31±9.86a 27.16 1.90±1.16ab 61.21
SC9 34.30±12.25ab 35.71 35.72±9.77a 27.34 2.20±1.85ab 83.76
SG-9 34.23±10.48ab 30.63 35.25±7.82a 22.18 2.21±1.09ab 49.55
平均Average 32.15 26.90 69.29

Table 3

Correlation analysis of cassava agronomic traits"

性状
Trait		 株高
Plant
height		 主茎粗
Stem
diameter		 第1分枝高
First branch
height		 落叶高度
Deciduous
height		 地上鲜重
Aboveground
fresh weight		 鲜薯个数
Number of
fresh cassava		 块根长
Roots
length		 块根粗
Roots
thick		 单株产量
Yield per
plant
株高Plant height 1.000
主茎粗Stem diameter 0.852** 1.000
第1分枝高
First branch height		 0.901** 0.806** 1.000
落叶高度Deciduous height 0.909** 0.884** 0.930** 1.000
地上鲜重
Aboveground fresh weight		 0.736** 0.773** 0.724** 0.782** 1.000
鲜薯个数
Number of fresh cassava		 0.818** 0.874** 0.818** 0.866** 0.769** 1.000
块根长Root length 0.422** 0.432** 0.470** 0.449** 0.454** 0.521** 1.000
块根粗Root thick 0.856** 0.866** 0.815** 0.821** 0.695** 0.798** 0.449** 1.000
单株产量Yield per plant 0.691** 0.739** 0.704** 0.753** 0.669** 0.897** 0.891** 0.884** 1.000

Fig.1

PCA analysis of agronomic traits of different cassava varieties (lines)"

Table 4

Score and ranking of principal component factors of ten cassava varieties (lines)"

品种
（系）
Variety
(line)		 主成分因子得分
Principal component
factor score		 综合得分
Composite
scores		 排名
Ranking
Y1 Y2 Y
SG-9 13.492 0.097 11.800 1
GMT 8.573 0.577 7.563 2
SC-1 6.240 -0.306 5.414 3
SC124 2.389 -0.005 2.087 4
277 0.984 -0.158 0.840 5
GR891 0.593 -0.450 0.461 6
58-7 -2.521 0.160 -2.182 7
SC205 -7.876 -0.068 -6.890 8
43-3 -8.056 -0.246 -7.070 9
SC9 -13.818 0.396 -12.023 10

Fig.2

Cluster analysis diagram of agronomic traits of cassava varieties (lines)"

Table 5

Agronomic traits of cassava in three groups"

性状
Trait		 类群ⅠGroupⅠ 类群ⅡGroupⅡ 类群ⅢGroup Ⅲ
M±SD CV (%) M±SD CV (%) M±SD CV (%)
株高Plant height (cm) 220.00±55.75ab 25.34 227.63±58.29a 25.61 201.93±61.99b 30.70
主茎粗Stem diameter (mm) 25.75±8.90a 34.57 23.75±9.73a 40.96 24.12±9.46a 39.24
第1分枝高First branch height (cm) 99.72±35.89ab 35.99 112.50±38.29a 34.03 86.80±37.89b 43.65
落叶高度Deciduous height (cm) 146.17±60.25ab 41.22 154.60±62.00a 40.10 129.90±65.12b 50.13
地上鲜重Aboveground fresh weight (kg) 2.94±1.91a 64.80 2.63±1.83ab 69.62 2.13±1.77b 82.91
鲜薯个数Number of fresh cassava 5.83±3.15ab 54.08 6.23±3.57a 57.34 4.83±3.08b 63.66
块根长Root length (cm) 31.50±10.24b 32.52 36.55±12.77a 34.95 34.30±12.25ab 35.71
块根粗Root thick (mm) 37.34±9.40a 25.17 35.26±11.63a 32.99 35.72±9.77a 27.34
单株产量Yield per plant (kg) 1.93±1.41b 72.90 2.44±1.59a 65.25 2.21±1.85ab 83.76
[1] Zidenga T, Leyva-Guerrero E, Moon H, et al. Extending cassava root shelf life via reduction of reactive oxygen species production. Plant Physiology, 2012, 159(4):1396-1407.
doi: 10.1104/pp.112.200345
[2] El-Sharkawy M A. Cassava biology and physiology. Plant Molecular Biology, 2004, 56(4):481-501.
pmid: 15669146
[3] Amanda P D S, Lynnicia N M, Deepak J, et al. Rooting for cassava:insights into photosynthesis and associated physiology as a route to improve yield potential. New Phytologist, 2017, 213:50-65.
doi: 10.1111/nph.14250 pmid: 27778353
[4] 孙倩. 巴西木薯种质资源农艺性状的GWAS分析. 南宁:广西大学, 2020.
[5] 韩本勇, Nguyen H L, 王昌梅, 等. 云南省木薯产业的SWOT分析. 安徽农业科学, 2014, 42(23):7802-7803.
[6] 宋记明, 张林辉, 段春芳, 等. 10个木薯新品系主要农艺性状分析与综合评价. 广东农业科学, 2020, 47(4):8-15.
[7] 杨亚鸽, 刘洁, 刘亚伟. 木薯淀粉制备热转化糊精及特性研究. 河南工业大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 42(4):38-43.
[8] 刘钰馨, 梁家能, 梁泽升, 等. 不同表面性质SiO2对热塑性木薯淀粉/LDPE复合材料薄膜的力学性能和结构影响. 塑料工业, 2021(增1):119-122.
[9] 赵郁聪, 王婧, 靳刘萍, 等. 不同淀粉原料对淀粉―壳聚糖复合膜性能的影响. 包装工程, 2021, 42(7):151-158.
[10] 刘子祯, 余世锋. 马铃薯淀粉、红薯淀粉、木薯淀粉吸水特性的研究. 粮食与油脂, 2021, 34(3):12-16.
[11] 申章佑, 李艳英, 周佳, 等. 粉垄耕作下减施肥料对木薯产量品质的影响初探. 中国土壤与肥料, 2022(2):99-105.
[12] 李艳英, 劳承英, 周佳, 等. 不同种茎长度对木薯产量和品质的影响. 西南农业学报, 2021, 34(3):514-519.
[13] 韦祖生, 杨秀娟, 付海天, 等. 稀植栽培对木薯种植生产的影响. 江西农业学报, 2021, 33(2):9-14.
[14] 中华人民共和国农业部种植业管理司. 引进农作物种质资源试种鉴定技术规程:NY/T 1737-2009. 北京: 中国农业出版社.
[15] 罗兴录, 潘晓璐, 朱艳梅. 木薯内源ABA含量与块根淀粉积累关系研究. 热带作物学报, 2018, 39(3):472-479.
[16] 杨守臻, 陈怀珠, 李初英, 等. 木薯主要农艺性状的遗传变异、相关性和主成分分析. 中国农学通报, 2006(7):232-234.
[17] Sarah A, Morag F, Steve R, et al. Information resoureces for cassava research and breeding. Tropical Plant Biology, 2012(5):140-151.
[18] El-sharkawy M A. International research on cassava photosynthesis,productivity,eco-physiology,and responses to environmental streses in the tropics. Photosynthetica, 2006, 44(4):481-512.
doi: 10.1007/s11099-006-0063-0
[19] 岑忠用, 罗兴录, 谢和霞, 等. 不同木薯品种抗衰老生理特性研究. 西南农业学报, 2004(5):609-612.
[20] 刘卫星, 张枫叶, 贺群岭, 等. 我国北方花生品种产量品质性状的综合评价及聚类分析. 江苏农业科学, 2019, 47(12):103-106.
[21] 黄国宋, 黄伟康, 郭静依, 等. 19份华北型黄瓜新品种主要农艺性状主成分分析和聚类分析. 现代农业科技, 2021(5):82-84,91.
[22] 吕丹, 黎瑞源, 郑冉, 等. 213份苦荞种质资源主要农艺性状分析及高产种质筛选. 南方农业学报, 2020, 51(10):2429-2439.
[23] 吕鑫, 平俊爱, 李慧明, 等. 不同类型饲草高粱产量、农艺和品质性状间的相关性及聚类分析. 山西农业科学, 2020, 48(11):1724-1729.
[24] 谢向誉, 陆柳英, 曾文丹, 等. 木薯单株产量与主要农艺性状的相关性研究. 中国农学通报, 2014, 30(27):223-228.
[1] Lü Jianzhen, Ren Ying, Wang Hongyong, Zhang Tingjun, Ma Jianping, Zhao Kai. Comprehensive Phenotype Evaluation of 264 Major Foxtail Millet Bred Varieties (Lines) [J]. Crops, 2022, 38(4): 22-31.
[2] Song Quanhao, Jin Yan, Song Jiajing, Chen Jie, Zhao Lishang, Bai Dong, Chen Liang, Zhu Tongquan. Comprehensive Evaluation of 35 Synthetic Hexaploid Wheat Cultivars [J]. Crops, 2022, 38(4): 69-76.
[3] Wang Siyu, Zuo Wenbo, Zhu Kaili, Guo Huimin, Xing Bao, Guo Yuqing, Bao Yuying, Yang Xiushi, Ren Guixing. Analysis and Evaluation of Agronomic Characteristics and Nutritional Qualities of 71 Quinoa Accessions [J]. Crops, 2022, 38(3): 63-72.
[4] Zhao Lirong, Ma Ke, Zhang Liguang, Tang Sha, Yuan Xiangyang, Diao Xianmin. Analysis of Agronomic Traits and Quality of Foxtail Millet Varieties in Different Ecological Regions [J]. Crops, 2022, 38(2): 44-53.
[5] Duan Yajuan, Cao Shiliang, Yu Tao, Li Wenyue, Yang Gengbin, Wang Chengbo, Liu Baomin, Liu Changhua. Identification of Salt Tolerance during Germination of Maize Inbred Lines [J]. Crops, 2022, 38(1): 213-219.
[6] Gao Fengyun, Siqin Bateer, Zhou Yu, Jia Xiaoyun, Su Shaofeng, Zhao Xiaoqing, Jin Xiaolei. Association Analysis of Crude Fat and Fatty Acid Components in Flax Based on SSR Markers [J]. Crops, 2022, 38(1): 44-49.
[7] Li Wenlue, Chen Changli, Luo Xiahong, Liu Tingting, An Xia, Jin Guanrong, Zhu Guanlin. Genetic Diversity Analysis of Phenotypic Characteristics of Kenaf Resources in Zhejiang Province [J]. Crops, 2022, 38(1): 50-55.
[8] Liu Wenlong, Ning Shanghui, Cao Mingfeng, Zhu Li, Gao Yuzhen, Zhang Xuewei, Wen Zixiang, Jiang Baodi, Jing Yanqiu, Deng Yong. Correlation Analysis of Soil Micronutrient and Chemical Components of Tobacco Leaves in Taoyuan County [J]. Crops, 2021, 37(5): 176-180.
[9] Liu Xin, Yang Fang, Deng Junbo, Wang Aiai, He Nian, Chen Yan. Phenotypic Analysis and Comprehensive Evaluation of Soybean Strains in Jianghan Plain of China [J]. Crops, 2021, 37(5): 57-63.
[10] Qi Xiaolei, Li Xingfeng, Lü Guangde, Wang Ruixia, Wang Jun, Sun Xianyin, Sun Yingying, Chen Yongjun, Qian Zhaoguo, Wu Ke. Genetic Analysis of Taishan/Taikemai Serial Wheat Based on SNP Molecular Markers [J]. Crops, 2021, 37(5): 64-71.
[11] Tang Hongqin, Li Zhongyi, Dong Wenbin, Wei Caihui, He Tieguang, Meng Yancheng, Tang Hailing, Mo Yongcheng. Effects of Different Intercropping Modes of Green Manure Replacing Chemical Fertilizer on Cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz) Traits and Yield [J]. Crops, 2021, 37(4): 184-190.
[12] Zhang Quanfang, Jiang Mingsong, Chen Feng, Zhu Wenyin, Zhou Xuebiao, Yang Lianqun, Xu Jiandi. Analysis of Genetic Diversity of Rice Varieties (Lines) in Shandong Province [J]. Crops, 2021, 37(4): 26-31.
[13] Du Xiaoyu, Li Nannan, Zou Shaokui, Wang Lina, Lü Yongjun, Zhang Qian, Li Shuncheng, Yang Guangyu, Han Yulin. Comprehensive Analysis of Main Traits of Newly Bred Wheat Varieties (Lines) in Southern Huang-Huai Region [J]. Crops, 2021, 37(4): 38-45.
[14] Zhou Yuexia, Fan Yu, Ruan Jingjun, Yan Jun, Lai Dili, Peng Yan, Tang Yong, Weng Wenfeng, Cheng Jianping. Correlation Analysis of Oat Grain Nutrition and Agronomic Traits [J]. Crops, 2021, 37(2): 165-172.
[15] Jin Jiangang, Tian Zaifang. Grey Correlation Analysis of Introduced Tartary Buckwheat in the Northern Shanxi [J]. Crops, 2021, 37(2): 52-56.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!