Crops ›› 2023, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (1): 84-88.doi: 10.16035/j.issn.1001-7283.2023.01.012

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Effects of Nitrogen Application Rate on Rice Quality of High Quality Conventional Indica Rice

Wu Zishuai(), Liu Guanglin, Li Hu, Luo Qunchang, Chen Chuanhua(), Zhu Qi’nan   

  1. Rice Research Institute, Guangxi Academy of Agricultural Sciences/Guangxi Key Laboratory of Rice Genetics and Breeding, Nanning 530007, Guangxi, China
  • Received:2022-03-16 Revised:2022-04-02 Online:2023-02-15 Published:2023-02-22

Abstract:

In order to investigate the effects of nitrogen application rate on conventional indica rice quality, Guixiang 18, Guiyu 12, Guiyu 9, Guiyu 11, Guiyu 18 and Guiyu 8 were used as materials, rice quality indexes under four nitrogen application rates were analyzed. The results showed that the brown rice rate and the milled rice rate increased first and then decreased with the increase of nitrogen application rate, and their values were higher when nitrogen application was 150.0kg/ha. The chalkiness rate and chalkiness degree of the tested varieties decreased with the increase of nitrogen application rate. Its lower value occured when nitrogen application was 150.0kg/ha or 187.5kg/ha. There was no significant difference in rice length and length-width ratio under nitrogen application of 150.0 and 187.5kg/ha. With the increase of nitrogen application rate, the amylose content of the tested varieties showed an upward trend, and the protein content increased significantly. The amylose content of the tested varieties reached the first-class quality standard when nitrogen application was 150.0kg/ha. In conclusion, under the experimental conditions, 150.0kg/ha was the most suitable nitrogen application rate to achieve better rice quality of the tested varieties.

Key words: High quality conventional indica rice, Nitrogen application rate, Processing quality, Appearance quality, Amylose content, Protein content

Table 1

Nitrogen fertilizer application period and amounts of different treatments kg/hm2"

处理
Treatment
总施氮量
Total nitrogen
application rate
返青肥(移栽后5d)
Greening fertilizer
(Five days after transplanting)
分蘖肥(移栽后12d)
Tillering fertilizer
(12 days after transplanting)
穗肥(移栽后40d)
Earing fertilizer
(40 days after transplanting)
N1 0.0 0.00 0.000 0.000
N2 112.5 33.75 50.625 28.125
N3 150.0 45.00 67.500 37.500
N4 187.5 56.25 84.375 46.875

Fig.1

Effects of nitrogen application rate on processing quality of high quality conventional indica rice Lowercase letters indicate significant difference at the 0.05 level,“*”indicates significant difference at the 0.05 level. The same below"

Table 2

Processing quality of high quality conventional indica rice under different nitrogen application rate %"

指标
Index
处理
Treatment
品种Variety
桂香18
Guixiang 18
桂育12
Guiyu 12
桂育9号
Guiyu 9
桂育11号
Guiyu 11
桂育18
Guiyu 18
桂育8号
Guiyu 8
糙米率Brown rice rate N1 68.41±1.40b 68.63±1.50b 72.74±1.69b 74.93±0.52b 70.86±1.09b 73.06±1.00b
N2 71.20±0.88a 76.57±1.55a 76.78±1.01a 79.97±1.57a 76.79±1.01a 80.90±1.19a
N3 73.40±0.53a 76.78±1.01a 76.14±2.44a 81.63±0.44a 77.22±1.36a 80.84±0.80a
N4 72.93±0.97a 76.14±2.44a 76.57±1.05a 74.54±1.53b 75.48±2.08a 80.14±2.09a
整精米率Head rice rate N1 48.92±1.03b 50.95±1.19b 50.28±0.26b 56.77±0.60b 51.23±0.83b 63.04±0.51b
N2 51.43±0.24a 54.99±0.38a 54.90±1.45a 60.81±0.15a 55.10±0.25a 67.47±1.00a
N3 51.53±0.28a 55.07±0.28a 54.61±1.43a 61.14±0.29a 54.96±0.36a 67.29±1.63a
N4 51.56±0.25a 54.82±0.38a 54.71±1.89a 57.09±0.08b 55.01±0.23a 67.19±1.17a

Fig.2

Effects of nitrogen application rate on appearance quality of high quality conventional indica rice"

Table 3

Apperance quality of high quality conventional indica rice under different nitrogen application rate"

指标
Index
处理
Treatment
品种Variety
桂香18
Guixiang 18
桂育12
Guiyu 12
桂育9号
Guiyu 9
桂育11号
Guiyu 11
桂育18
Guiyu 18
桂育8号
Guiyu 8
粒长Rice length (mm) N1 6.849±0.080b 6.398±0.025a 6.122±0.024b 5.997±0.111a 6.485±0.055a 6.412±0.142a
N2 6.841±0.078b 6.357±0.028a 6.244±0.050ab 6.032±0.049a 6.503±0.063a 6.355±0.017a
N3 6.956±0.035ab 6.326±0.064a 6.278±0.039a 6.082±0.042a 6.428±0.071a 6.376±0.045a
N4 7.015±0.081a 6.415±0.119a 6.295±0.038a 6.080±0.105a 6.426±0.100a 6.420±0.081a
长宽比Length-width ratio N1 3.998±0.017b 3.567±0.058a 3.312±0.004b 3.231±0.091a 3.247±0.037a 3.429±0.053a
N2 4.001±0.004b 3.557±0.033a 3.374±0.075ab 3.184±0.042a 3.274±0.012a 3.378±0.022a
N3 4.063±0.087ab 3.533±0.059a 3.397±0.020a 3.217±0.017a 3.243±0.050a 3.394±0.045a
N4 4.095±0.059a 3.560±0.070a 3.402±0.029a 3.226±0.055a 3.244±0.025a 3.425±0.023a
垩白粒率Chalkiness rate (%) N1 3.27±0.32a 3.64±0.32a 3.57±0.32a 5.24±0.41a 4.00±0.41a 4.82±0.37a
N2 2.52±0.46ab 2.85±0.41b 3.04±0.31ab 4.40±0.99b 3.82±0.47a 4.06±0.89b
N3 1.77±0.24bc 1.79±0.70c 2.72±0.34b 2.77±0.14c 2.47±0.40b 3.11±0.84c
N4 1.54±0.40c 1.79±0.35c 2.36±0.11b 2.87±0.19c 2.42±0.04b 3.21±0.22c
垩白度Chalkiness degree (%) N1 1.10±0.11a 1.22±0.11a 1.13±0.05a 1.59±0.05a 1.24±0.15a 1.55±0.12a
N2 0.84±0.15b 0.67±0.15b 1.02±0.10ab 1.47±0.33a 1.21±0.10a 1.36±0.30ab
N3 0.59±0.08c 0.63±0.18b 0.92±0.09b 0.93±0.05b 0.83±0.14b 1.21±0.05bc
N4 0.52±0.13c 0.60±0.12b 0.84±0.05b 0.96±0.07b 0.81±0.02b 1.08±0.09c

Fig.3

Effects of nitrogen application rate on amylose and protein contents of high quality conventional indica rice"

Table 4

Amylose and protein content of high quality conventional indica rice under different nitrogen application rate %"

指标
Index
处理
Treatment
品种Variety
桂香18
Guixiang 18
桂育12
Guiyu 12
桂育9号
Guiyu 9
桂育11号
Guiyu 11
桂育18
Guiyu 18
桂育8号
Guiyu 8
直链淀粉含量Amylose content N1 13.10±0.45a 14.02±0.69b 14.53±0.28a 13.63±0.27b 12.98±0.78b 12.35±1.26b
N2 13.06±0.46a 14.22±1.19ab 14.40±0.68a 13.60±0.59b 12.95±0.50b 15.27±0.19a
N3 13.20±0.09a 14.37±1.31ab 14.54±1.38a 14.72±0.27a 14.29±0.16a 15.48±0.38a
N4 13.91±0.25a 15.23±0.31a 15.20±0.05a 14.75±0.13a 14.33±0.24a 15.36±0.41a
蛋白质含量Protein content N1 4.51±0.29c 4.03±0.14c 4.03±0.06c 5.20±0.34b 5.18±0.39b 4.64±0.27b
N2 4.96±0.14bc 4.81±0.27b 4.76±0.21b 5.33±0.36b 5.58±0.17ab 4.86±0.49b
N3 5.27±0.12ab 5.18±0.24b 4.94±0.44b 5.94±0.48a 5.88±0.37a 5.58±0.27a
N4 5.69±0.37a 5.85±0.42a 5.46±0.18a 5.94±0.45a 5.97±0.21a 6.07±0.66a
[1] 李虎, 陈传华, 刘广林, 等. 2006-2015年广西优质常规稻育种现状分析. 南方农业学报, 2017, 48(2):375-380.
[2] 吴子帅, 罗翠萍, 李虎, 等. 氮高效型优质常规稻品种资源筛选. 南方农业学报, 2021, 52(1):63-69.
[3] 程方民, 刘正辉, 张嵩午. 稻米品质形成的气候生态条件评价及我国地域分布规律. 生态学报, 2002, 22(5):636-642.
[4] 涂云彪, 马鹏, 兰艳, 等. 施氮量对水稻籽粒脂类合成的影响. 江西农业大学学报, 2020, 42(4):655-663.
[5] 兰艳, 黄鹏, 江谷驰弘, 等. 成都平原稻作区施氮量和栽插密度对粳稻D46产量及品质的影响. 浙江大学学报(农业与生命科学版), 2016, 42(1):63-73.
[6] 唐健, 唐闯, 郭保卫, 等. 氮肥施用量对机插优质晚稻产量和稻米品质的影响. 作物学报, 2020, 46(1):117-130.
[7] 张自常, 李鸿伟, 曹转勤, 等. 施氮量和灌溉方式的交互作用对水稻产量和品质影响. 作物学报, 2013, 39(1):84-92.
[8] 吴子帅, 李虎, 黄秋要, 等. 施氮量和栽插密度对桂育11号产量和稻米品质的影响. 中国农业科技导报, 2021, 23(8):154-162.
[9] 金正勋, 秋太权, 孙艳丽, 等. 氮肥对稻米垩白及蒸煮食味品质特性的影响. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2001, 7(1):31-35.
[10] 严凯, 蒋玉兰, 唐纪元, 等. 盐碱地条件下施氮量和栽插密度对水稻产量和品质的影响. 中国土壤与肥料, 2018(2):67-74.
[11] 袁帅, 苏雨婷, 陈平平, 等. 施氮对稻米品质的影响研究进展与展望. 作物研究, 2021, 35(4):394-400.
[12] 徐春梅, 王丹英, 邵国胜, 等. 施氮量和栽插密度对超高产水稻中早22产量和品质的影响. 中国水稻科学, 2008, 22(5):507-512.
[13] 成臣, 曾勇军, 王祺, 等. 施氮量对晚粳稻甬优1538产量、品质及氮素吸收利用的影响. 水土保持学报, 2018, 32(5):222-228.
[14] 兰宇辰, 郭晓红, 李猛, 等. 施氮量与移栽密度互作对垦粳7号稻米品质的影响. 中国农业科技导报, 2021, 23(1):136-145.
doi: 10.13304/j.nykjdb.2019.0673
[15] 熊飞, 王忠, 顾蕴洁, 等. 施氮时期对扬稻6号颖果发育及稻米品质的影响. 中国水稻科学, 2007, 21(6):637-642.
[16] 赵海成, 杜春影, 魏媛媛, 等. 施肥方式和氮肥运筹对寒地水稻产量与品质的影响. 中国土壤与肥料, 2019(3):76-86.
[17] 许仁良, 戴其根, 霍中洋, 等. 施氮量对水稻不同品种类型稻米品质的影响. 扬州大学学报(农业与生命科学版), 2005, 26(1):66-68.
[18] 张洪程, 王秀芹, 戴其根, 等. 施氮量对杂交稻两优培九产量、品质及吸氮特性的影响. 中国农业科学, 2003, 36(7):800-806.
[19] 从夕汉, 施伏芝, 阮新民, 等. 氮肥水平对不同基因型水稻氮素利用率、产量和品质的影响. 应用生态学报, 2017, 28(4):1219-1226.
doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201704.010
[20] 高辉, 马群, 李国业, 等. 氮肥水平对不同生育类型粳稻稻米蒸煮食味品质的影响. 中国农业科学, 2010, 43(21):4543-4552.
[21] 李润卿, 申勇, 朱宽宇, 等. 施氮量对超级稻南粳9108产量、淀粉RVA谱特征值和理化特性的影. 作物杂志, 2022(1):205-212.
[22] 王保君, 程旺大, 沈亚强, 等. 氮肥减量对优质稻籽粒蛋白质影响及其合理性评价. 作物杂志, 2022(3):168-173.
[23] 刘海, 赵欢, 何佳芳, 等. 稻米营养品质影响因素研究进展. 贵州农业科学, 2013, 41(6):85-89.
[1] Ma Ruiqi, Wang Demei, Tao Zhiqiang, Wang Yanjie, Yang Yushuang, Zhao Guangcai, Chang Xuhong. Effects of Nitrogen Application Rate on Yield and Quality of Weak Gluten Wheat in Northern Winter Wheat Region [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(1): 163-169.
[2] Zhang Xi, Xie Jin, Huang Hao, Gao Renji, Lu Chao, Zhou Yilin, Liang Zengfa, Wang Wei. Effects of Nitrogen Fertilizer Operation and Plant Spacing on Yield and Quality of Yunyan 116 in Pu’er Tobacco Area [J]. Crops, 2022, 38(5): 188-194.
[3] Zheng Minna, Liang Xiuzhi, Kang Jiahui, Li Yinfan, Wang Hui, Han Zhishun, Chen Yanni. Effects of Different Nitrogen Application Rates on Photosynthetic Characteristics and Nitrogen Photosynthetic Utilization Efficiency of Fed Oats [J]. Crops, 2022, 38(4): 249-254.
[4] Hao Ruixuan, Sun Min, Ren Aixia, Lin Wen, Wang Peiru, Han Xuyang, Wang Qiang, Gao Zhiqiang. Research on the Relationship between Water Use and Dry Matter Accumulation and Quality of Wide Space Sowing Winter Wheat and the Regulation of Sowing Density [J]. Crops, 2022, 38(2): 119-126.
[5] Lu Dandan, Ye Miao, Zhang Zujian. Research Progress on Rice Protein and Its Components and Their Effects on Rice Quality [J]. Crops, 2022, 38(2): 28-34.
[6] Liu Menghong, Wang Zhijun, Li Hongyu, Zhao Haicheng, Lü Yandong. Effects of Fertilization Method and Nitrogen Application Rate on Yield, Quality and Nitrogen Utilization of Rice in Cold Region [J]. Crops, 2022, 38(1): 102-109.
[7] Wang Qingbin, Lu Jiechun, Peng Chun’e, Meng Hui, Liu Zhiguo, Wang Hongfeng, Zhang Min. Effects of Different Nitrogen Application Rates Combined with Extracts of Paecilomyces variotii (ZNC) on Growth and Nitrogen Uptake of Pakchoi [J]. Crops, 2022, 38(1): 190-195.
[8] Li Runqing, Shen Yong, Zhu Kuanyu, Wang Zhiqin, Yang Jianchang. Effects of Nitrogen Application Rates on the Grain Yield, Starch RVA Profile Characteristics and Physicochemical Properties of Super Rice Nanjing 9108 [J]. Crops, 2022, 38(1): 205-212.
[9] Gao Tiantian, Wang Demei, Wang Yanjie, Yang Yushuang, Chang Xuhong, Zhao Guangcai. Response of Different Spring Wheat Varieties to Nitrogen Treatment [J]. Crops, 2021, 37(6): 67-71.
[10] Zhang Jiawen, Lu Shaohao, Zhao Mingqin, Zhong Qiu, Wang Jun, Yi Kai, Xiang Huan. Effects of Nitrogen Application Rates on Carbon and Nitrogen Metabolism and Quality of Cigar Leaves in Sichuan [J]. Crops, 2021, 37(4): 159-165.
[11] Zhang Xi, Wang Huifang, Dai Zhuoyi, Xue Gang, Xu Shixiao, Yang Tiezhao. Effects of Genotype, Nitrogen Application Rate and Their Interactions on Polyphenols in Flue-Cured Tobacco [J]. Crops, 2021, 37(3): 84-90.
[12] Wang Yujiao, Cao Qi, Chang Xuhong, Wang Demei, Wang Yanjie, Yang Yushuang, Zhao Guangcai, Shi Shubing. Effects of Chemical Regulation on Wheat Yield and Quality under Different Soil Conditions [J]. Crops, 2021, 37(2): 96-100.
[13] Liu Jiamin, Wang Yang, Chu Xu, Qi Xin, Wang Manman, Zhao Ya'nan, Ye Youliang, Huang Yufang. Effects of Planting Density and Nitrogen Application Rate on Annual Yield and Nitrogen Use Efficiency of Wheat-Maize Rotation System [J]. Crops, 2021, 37(1): 143-149.
[14] Tian Rongcai, Gao Zhiqiang, Lu Junwei. Estimation of Crude Protein Content in Grain of Early Indica Rice Based on Canopy Spectrum [J]. Crops, 2020, 36(4): 188-194.
[15] Chen Tianxin,Wang Yanjie,Zhang Yan,Chang Xuhong,Tao Zhiqiang,Wang Demei,Yang Yushuang,Zhu Yingjie,Liu Akang,Shi Shubing,Zhao Guangcai. Effects of Different Nitrogen Rates on Photosyntheticand Physiological Indexes and Yield of Winter Wheat [J]. Crops, 2020, 36(2): 88-96.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!