Crops ›› 2021, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (4): 159-165.doi: 10.16035/j.issn.1001-7283.2021.04.024

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Effects of Nitrogen Application Rates on Carbon and Nitrogen Metabolism and Quality of Cigar Leaves in Sichuan

Zhang Jiawen1(), Lu Shaohao1, Zhao Mingqin1(), Zhong Qiu2, Wang Jun2, Yi Kai2, Xiang Huan2   

  1. 1College of Tobacco Science, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou 450002, Henan, China
    2Deyang Tobacco Company of Sichuan Province, Deyang 618400, Sichuan, China
  • Received:2020-08-21 Revised:2020-08-29 Online:2021-08-15 Published:2021-08-13
  • Contact: Zhao Mingqin E-mail:zjw960212@163.com;zhaomingqin@henau.edu.cn

RichHTML

3

PDF (PC)

282

Abstract:

In order to explore the effects of nitrogen application rate on the carbon and nitrogen metabolism during the growth of cigar leaves and the quality of tobacco leaves after airing. Taking Dexue No.1 as the experimental material, the effects of different nitrogen application rates (120, 165 and 210kg/ha, represented in T1, T2 and T3) on the key enzyme activities of carbon and nitrogen metabolism and plastid pigments during cigar leaves growth, and chemical composition, physical characteristics and sensory quality of cigar leaves after airing were analyzed. The results showed that, during the growth of cigar leaves, the activities of amylase (AL), neutral invertase (NI), nitrate reductase (NR), glutamine synthetase (GS) and the content of starch all increased first and then decreased under different treatments, but the content of total nitrogen showed a downward trend. With the increase of nitrogen application rate, during different measurement periods, the activities of AL, NI, NR, GS and the contents of total nitrogen of tobacco leaves increased, while the starch content decreased. Compared with T1 at mature stage, the contents of chlorophyll and carotenoid of T3 treatment increased by 41.71% and 21.31%, respectively, which was harmful to the normal metabolism of carbon-nitrogen and tobacco maturing. The nitrogen-nicotine ratio of T2 treatment was lower and potassium-chlorine ratio was higher, and the chemical components were suitable, the pull and equilibrium moisture content were higher, the stem ratio was lower, and the physical characteristics were good, the scores of aroma quality, aroma volume and combustibility were higher, and the sensory quality was good. Therefore, the suitable nitrogen application rate for cigar leaves was determined to be 165kg/ha in Shifang, Sichuan province. It was conducive to increase the carbon and nitrogen metabolism capacity and improve the quality of cigar leaves.

Key words: Nitrogen application rate, Cigar tobacco leaves, Carbon and nitrogen metabolism, Chemical composition, Sensory quality

Fig.1

Effects of nitrogen application rates on the AL, NI, NR and GS activities in cigar leaves Different lowercase letters indicate significant difference between treatments (P<0.05), the same below"

Fig.2

Effects of nitrogen application rates on starch and total nitrogen contents in cigar leaves"

Table 1

Effects of nitrogen application rates on plastid pigment content in cigar leaves mg/g"

指标
Index		 处理
Treatment		 移栽后天数Days after transplanting
40d 50d 60d 70d
叶绿素含量Chlorophyll content T1 2.82±0.11b 3.10±0.23c 2.40±0.21b 1.75±0.15b
T2 3.18±0.08a 3.64±0.18b 2.65±0.18ab 1.99±0.18b
T3 3.31±0.22a 3.76±0.22a 2.95±0.13a 2.48±0.20a
类胡萝卜素含量Carotenoid content T1 0.59±0.04b 0.90±0.03c 0.74±0.04b 0.61±0.03b
T2 0.63±0.02ab 0.99±0.03b 0.84±0.02a 0.67±0.03b
T3 0.69±0.03a 1.06±0.04a 0.90±0.05a 0.74±0.06a

Table 2

Effects of nitrogen application rates on chemical composition in cigar leaves"

处理
Treatment		 总糖
Total sugar
(%)		 还原糖
Reducing
sugar (%)		 总氮
Total nitrogen
(%)		 烟碱
Nicotine
(%)		 氯
Chlorine
(%)		 钾
Potassium
(%)		 氮碱比
Nitrogen- nicotine ratio		 钾氯比
Potassium- chlorine ratio
T1 0.80±0.02a 0.37±0.01a 3.80±0.04b 2.48±0.07c 0.52±0.04a 3.54±0.18a 1.54±0.06a 6.86±0.64a
T2 0.74±0.02b 0.35±0.02ab 3.92±0.05b 2.81±0.08b 0.54±0.04a 3.79±0.18a 1.39±0.03b 7.07±0.37a
T3 0.70±0.01b 0.33±0.03b 4.60±0.09a 3.26±0.08a 0.57±0.04a 3.43±0.16a 1.41±0.05b 6.08±0.54a

Table 3

Comparison of physical characteristics of cigar leaves under different treatments"

处理
Treatment		 叶质重
Leaf weight (g/m2)		 叶厚
Leaf thickness (μm)		 拉力
Pull (N)		 含梗率
Stem ratio (%)		 平衡含水率
Equilibrium moisture content (%)
T1 21.37b 44.86c 1.27b 20.84a 13.01a
T2 23.65ab 48.27b 1.78a 16.51b 15.96a
T3 26.91a 57.04a 1.64a 18.32ab 14.62a

Table 4

Comparison of sensory quality of cigar leaves under different treatments"

处理Treatment 香气质
Quality of aroma		 香气量
Volume of aroma		 浓度
Concentration		 劲头
Momentum		 刺激性
Thrill		 杂气
Mixed gas		 余味
Aftertaste		 灰色
Ash		 燃烧性
Combustibility		 总分
Total score
T1 6.1 6.3 6.4 6.3 5.7 6.4 6.3 6.6 6.7 56.8
T2 6.3 6.6 6.1 6.4 6.1 6.6 6.2 6.6 6.9 57.8
T3 5.7 6.1 6.1 6.7 6.3 6.1 5.8 6.3 6.6 55.7
[1] 李爱军, 秦艳青, 代惠娟, 等. 国产雪茄烟叶科学发展刍议. 中国烟草学报, 2012,18(1):112-114.
[2] 张森, 许自成, 李京京, 等. 烟草碳氮代谢及其调控技术研究进展. 生物技术进展, 2016,6(5):312-318.
[3] 李志, 史宏志, 刘国顺, 等. 施氮量对皖南砂壤土烤烟碳氮代谢动态变化的影响. 土壤, 2010,42(1):8-13.
[4] 杨楷, 郑宏斌, 黄莺, 等. 施氮量对烤烟氮代谢关键酶活性的影响. 山地农业生物学报, 2020,39(3):75-79.
[5] 邓世媛, 谢晋, 周立非, 等. 精量施氮对烤烟成熟期叶片碳氮代谢的影响. 烟草科技, 2013,46(9):76-81.
[6] 时向东, 刘艳芳, 文志强, 等. 施N水平对雪茄外包皮烟叶片生长发育和内源激素含量的影响. 西北植物学报, 2007,27(8):1625-1630.
[7] 凡聪, 赵兵飞, 符云鹏, 等. 氮用量对蛟河晒红烟碳氮代谢关键酶活性及品质的影响. 烟草科技, 2019,52(8):30-36.
[8] 许晨曦, 刘国顺, 李向阳, 等. 品种与施氮量互作对烟草碳氮代谢关键酶的影响. 江苏农业科学, 2012,40(3):83-85.
[9] 张锐新, 任天宝, 殷全玉, 等. 施氮量对海南五指山雪茄生长发育及品质的影响. 山西农业科学, 2017,45(12):1969-1974,1978.
[10] 云菲, 刘国顺, 史宏志. 光氮互作对烟草气体交换和部分碳氮代谢酶活性及品质的影响. 作物学报, 2010,36(3):508-516.
[11] 吴薇, 韩相龙, 郑璞帆, 等. 移栽方式与施氮量对烤烟生长发育和产质量的影响. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2018,24(2):535-543.
[12] 鲁黎明, 曾孝敏, 顾会战, 等. 施氮量对烤烟氮代谢关键酶基因表达及代谢产物的影响. 浙江农业学报, 2018,30(3):454-460.
[13] 国家烟草专卖局. 烟草及烟草制品质体色素的测定:YC/T 382-2010. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2010.
[14] 汤章城. 现代植物生理学实验指南. 北京: 科学出版社, 1999.
[15] 吉书文, 腾兆波. 烟草物理检测. 郑州: 河南科学技术出版社, 1997.
[16] 国家烟草专卖局. 烟草在制品感官评价方法:YC/T415-2011. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2011.
[17] 杨宁, 张铭真, 禹洋, 等. 不同施氮量对不同品种烤烟品质的影响. 天津农业科学, 2019,25(8):48-51.
[18] 姚芳, 王慧方, 莫娇, 等. 施氮水平对海南茄衣农艺性状、植烟土壤养分状况及烟叶化学成分的影响. 山东农业科学, 2016,48(10):98-102.
[19] 雷佳, 吕永华, 李淮源, 等. 烤烟碳氮代谢调节机理及其指标研究进展. 广东农业科学, 2018,45(12):20-26.
[20] 王冠, 周清明, 杨宇虹, 等. 施氮量对烤烟碳氮代谢关键酶活性及经济性状的影响. 湖南农业科学, 2013(5):30-33,37.
[21] 牛德新, 连文力, 崔红, 等. 施氮量对烤烟成熟期中部烟叶碳氮代谢及相关基因表达的影响. 烟草科技, 2017,50(8):10-15.
[22] 李一凡, 赵松超, 刘博远, 等. 采收时间对雪茄碳氮代谢关键酶活性和化学成分的影响. 中国农业科技导报, 2019,21(3):126-132.
[23] 刘国顺, 彭智良, 黄元炯, 等. N、P互作对烤烟碳氮代谢关键酶活性的影响. 中国烟草学报, 2009,15(5):33-37.
[24] 康雪莉. 吉林晒烟生长发育及碳氮代谢与品质关系研究. 郑州:河南农业大学, 2014.
[25] 葛国锋, 王树会, 刘卫群. 氮肥对不同烤烟品种碳氮代谢关键酶活性的影响. 中国农业科技导报, 2014,16(1):59-64.
[26] 赵铭钦, 刘金霞, 黄永成, 等. 烟草质体色素与烟叶品质的关系综述. 中国农学通报, 2007,23(7):135-138.
[27] 时向东, 汪文杰, 王卫武, 等. 遮荫下氮肥用量对雪茄外包皮烟叶光合特性的调控效应. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2007,13(2):299-304.
[28] 赵兵飞, 孙双, 侯振武, 等. 不同氮钾配比对晒红烟碳氮代谢及化学成分的影响. 作物杂志, 2018(2):73-79.
[29] 韩福根. 烟草化学. 北京:中国农业出版社, 2010.
[30] 李军华, 唐杰, 梁坤, 等. 印尼与国内雪茄烟叶主要化学成分差异分析. 浙江农业科学, 2015,56(7):1080-1083.
[31] 李兰周, 史宏志, 刘国顺, 等. 四川白肋烟主栽品种适宜施氮量研究. 中国烟草学报, 2009,15(3):58-62.
[32] 周恒, 许自成, 戴亚, 等. 我国主产烟区烤烟总氮、总植物碱、氮碱比与感官质量的关系分析. 江西农业学报, 2009,21(7):18-21.
[1] Sun Yanxin, Li Ziwei, Zhang Haoyang, Guo Xiaoheng, Xu Zicheng. Distribution Characteristics of Fe in Soil and Tobacco Leaves in Malong and Zhanyi Tobacco Areas and Their Effects on the Sensory Quality of Tobacco Leaves [J]. Crops, 2021, 37(3): 140-148.
[2] Wang Huifang, Zhang Xi, Feng Xiaohu, Li Yifan, Zhang Hong, Zhao Songchao, Zhao Mingqin. Effects of Different Plant Growth Regulators on the Growth and Development of Flue-Cured Tobacco [J]. Crops, 2021, 37(3): 173-177.
[3] Zhang Xi, Wang Huifang, Dai Zhuoyi, Xue Gang, Xu Shixiao, Yang Tiezhao. Effects of Genotype, Nitrogen Application Rate and Their Interactions on Polyphenols in Flue-Cured Tobacco [J]. Crops, 2021, 37(3): 84-90.
[4] Liu Jiamin, Wang Yang, Chu Xu, Qi Xin, Wang Manman, Zhao Ya'nan, Ye Youliang, Huang Yufang. Effects of Planting Density and Nitrogen Application Rate on Annual Yield and Nitrogen Use Efficiency of Wheat-Maize Rotation System [J]. Crops, 2021, 37(1): 143-149.
[5] Shen Hongtao,Zhang Fusheng,Li Dong,Qiu Jianhua,Cai Xinghong,Qin Yubao. Effects of Different Preceding Crops and Planting Density on Yield and Quality of Flue-Cured Tobacco in Mudanjiang [J]. Crops, 2020, 36(2): 105-111.
[6] Chen Tianxin,Wang Yanjie,Zhang Yan,Chang Xuhong,Tao Zhiqiang,Wang Demei,Yang Yushuang,Zhu Yingjie,Liu Akang,Shi Shubing,Zhao Guangcai. Effects of Different Nitrogen Rates on Photosyntheticand Physiological Indexes and Yield of Winter Wheat [J]. Crops, 2020, 36(2): 88-96.
[7] Huang Yinling,Lei Zhongshun,Zheng Tao,Suo Xinxia. Effects of Different Nitrogen Concentrations on Yield and Benefit of Winter Wheat and Soil Physical and Chemical Properties [J]. Crops, 2020, 36(1): 130-135.
[8] Li Bo,Gong Liang,Qu Hang,Jin Dandan,Sun Wentao. Effects of Nitrogen Application Rate on Rice Growth and Yield in Liaohe Delta [J]. Crops, 2020, 36(1): 173-178.
[9] Xiaojun Xiao,Weisheng Lü,Paolan Yu,Wei Zheng,Yazhen Li,Lei Hu,Fuliang Xiao,Shaowen Zhang,Tianbao Huang,Guobin Xiao. Effects of Nitrogen Application Rate on Yield Formation and Nitrogen Use Efficiency of Early Rice under Rape Straw Returning in Triple Cropping [J]. Crops, 2019, 35(2): 103-109.
[10] Haosheng Li,Yan Li,Chenglai Wu,Linmao Zhao,Chunqing Zhang. Effects of DA-6 Treatment at Post-Anthesis on Seed Vigor of Maize Inbred Zheng 58 [J]. Crops, 2019, 35(1): 186-191.
[11] Xiaohua Shi,Haiying Yang,Wenqin Kang,Yonglin Qin,Mingshou Fan,Liguo Jia. Effects of Nitrogen Fertilization on Crop Yields and Soil Nitrogen Balance in Potato-Wheat System [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(2): 108-116.
[12] Lina Jiang,Ying Yue,Jinna Li,Yawen Zhang,Yalin Zhu,Chunxi Li. Effects of Nitrogen Application Rate on Nitrogen Allocation and Nitrogen Utilization after Anthesis in Wheat [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(2): 80-86.
[13] Hongqu Liao,Hongli Chen,Wensi Fan,Yu Chen,Qiujing Han,Jianjun Yu,Ming Ma. Fractal Characteristics of Soil Particles and Their Effects on Physicochemical Properties of Tobacco Leaves in Main Tobacco Growing Areas in Henan [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(1): 118-125.
[14] Pingping Chen,Jing Yang,Juan Li,Naimei Tu,Zhenxie Yi. Study on Interaction Effects of Fertilizer and Density on Late Rice after Tobacco in Tobacco-Rice Rotation System in Changsha Tobacco Area [J]. Crops, 2016, 32(6): 79-84.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!