Crops ›› 2023, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (5): 91-97.doi: 10.16035/j.issn.1001-7283.2023.05.013

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Effects of Multi-Year Organic Fertilizer Application on Starch Physicochemical Properties of Mid-Mature Soft Japonica Rice

Zhai Jing1(), Yang Shengming2, Wang Yuzhen3, Shi Linlin3()   

  1. 1Shanghai Vocational College of Agriculture and Forestry, Shanghai 201699, China
    2Shanghai Yuejin Modern Agriculture Co., Ltd., Shanghai 202171, China
    3Institute of Agricultural Sciences in Taihu Lake Region, Suzhou 215155, Jiangsu, China
  • Received:2023-06-14 Revised:2023-07-06 Online:2023-10-15 Published:2023-10-16

RichHTML

4

PDF (PC)

86

Abstract:

To elucidate the effects of organic fertilizer in organic cultivation workflow on rice eating quality, we systematically compared and explored the rice starch physicochemical properties between organic cultivation mode (OF) and conventional chemical fertilization mode (CK). The results showed that OF treatment significantly decreased apparent amylose contents, large-sized granule percentage and retrogradation, but significantly improved swelling power, water solubility, mid-sized granule percentage, relative crystallinity, peak viscosity, hot viscosity, final viscosity and enthalpy value. In summary, as a key management practice in organic cultivation workflow, organic fertilization deeply shaped rice starch physicochemical properties and efficiently promoted rice starch quality.

Key words: Organic fertilizer, Japonica rice, Starch physicochemical properties

Table 1

Rice starch contents, swelling power and water solubility under the different fertilization treatments"

处理
Treatment		 直链淀粉含量
Apparent amylose
contents (%)		 膨胀势
Swelling
power (g/g)		 水溶性指数
Water solubility
(%)
CK 9.94a 11.5b 11.6b
OF 9.23b 13.3a 12.8a

Fig.1

Scanning electron micrographs of rice starch under the different fertilization treatments"

Fig.2

Distribution characteristics of rice starch under the different fertilization treatments The different small letters represent significant differences between treatments (P < 0.05)"

Fig.3

XRD structures of rice starch under the different fertilization treatments"

Fig.4

The ATR-FTIR determination of rice starch under the different fertilization treatments"

Fig.5

Rice starch RVA spectrum under the different fertilization treatments “*”represents significant differences between treatments at 0.05 level, the same below"

Fig.6

Thermal parameters of rice starch under the different fertilization treatments"

[1] 张洪程, 胡雅杰, 杨建昌, 等. 中国特色水稻栽培学发展与展望. 中国农业科学, 2021, 54(7):1301-1321.
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2021.07.001
[2] 国家统计局数据. (2022-12-12)[2023-06-10]. http://www.stats.gov.cn/sj/zxfb/202302/t20230203.1901673.html.
[3] Shi L L, Shen M X, Wu H J, et al. Using sowing date management to promote micronutrient quality and alleviate cadmium accumulation in rice grains. Cereal Research Communications, 2020, 48(4):575-583.
doi: 10.1007/s42976-020-00094-1
[4] 刘秋员, 周磊, 田晋钰, 等. 长江中下游地区常规中熟粳稻产量、品质及氮素吸收性状的相互关系分析. 作物学报, 2021, 47(5):904-914.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2021.02050
[5] 韩超, 许方甫, 卞金龙, 等. 淮北地区机械化种植方式对不同生育类型优质食味粳稻产量及品质的影响. 作物学报, 2018, 44(11):1681-1693.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2018.01681
[6] Thakur N, Nigam M, Tewary R, et al. Drivers for the behavioural receptiveness and non-receptiveness of farmers towards organic cultivation system. Journal of King Saud University-Science, 2022, 34(5):102107.
doi: 10.1016/j.jksus.2022.102107
[7] 王建林, 李婕, 曹元元. 稻鸭共生有机栽培模式对黄河三角洲稻米品质的影响. 应用生态学报, 2016, 27(7):2315-2320.
doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.201607.038
[8] 李玉林, 徐承昱, 胡雪, 等. 有机和常规施肥模式的土壤养分特征及对不同食味型粳稻产量和品质的影响. 核农学报, 2022, 36(2):445-455.
doi: 10.11869/j.issn.100-8551.2022.02.0445
[9] 侯立刚, 马巍, 孙洪娇, 等. 有机栽培对水稻产量和品质影响的研究. 吉林农业科学, 2012, 37(1):1-3.
[10] 国家市场监督管理总局.有机产品生产、 加工、标识与管理体系要求. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2019.
[11] Salam M A, Sarker M N I, Sharmin S. Do organic fertilizer impact on yield and efficiency of rice farms? Empirical evidence from Bangladesh. Heliyon, 2021, 7(8):e07731.
doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07731
[12] 陈帅君, 边嘉宾, 丁得亮, 等. 不同有机肥处理对水稻品质和食味的影响. 中国稻米, 2016, 22(4):42-45.
[13] Takeda Y, Takeda C, Mizukami H, et al. Structures of large,medium and small starch granules of barley grain. Carbohydrate Polymers, 1999, 38(2):109-114.
doi: 10.1016/S0144-8617(98)00105-2
[14] 中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验检疫总局, 中国国家标准化管理委员会. 大米直链淀粉含量的测定:GB/T 15683- 2008. 北京: 中国标准出版社, 2008.
[15] Zhu D, Zhang H, Guo B, et al. Effect of Nitrogen management on the structure and physicochemical properties of rice starch. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 2016, 64(42):8019-8025.
doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.6b03173 pmid: 27715058
[16] Zhang C Q, Zhou L H, Zhu Z B, et al. Characterization of grain quality and starch fine structure of two japonica rice (Oryza sativa) cultivars with good sensory properties at different temperatures during the filling stage. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 2016, 64(20):4048-4057.
doi: 10.1021/acs.jafc.6b00083 pmid: 27128366
[17] Nara S, Komiya T. Studies on the relationship between water- satured state and crystallinity by the diffraction method for moistened potato starch. Starch-Strke, 1983, 35(12):407-410.
[18] 王忠. 稻米的品质与影响因素. 分子植物育种, 2003, 1(2):234-241.
[19] Singh S, Singh N, Isono N, et al. Relationship of granule size distribution and amylopectin structure with pasting,thermal,and retrogradation properties in wheat starch. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry, 2010, 58(2):1180-1188.
doi: 10.1021/jf902753f
[20] Zhou T, Zhou Q, Li E, et al. Effects of nitrogen fertilizer on structure and physicochemical properties of ‘super’ rice starch. Carbohydrate Polymers, 2020, 239:116237.
doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2020.116237
[21] Zhou T Y, Li Z K, Li E P, et al. Optimization of nitrogen fertilization improves rice quality by affecting the structure and physicochemical properties of starch at high yield levels. Journal of Integrative Agriculture, 2022, 21(6):1576-1592.
doi: 10.1016/S2095-3119(21)63678-X
[22] Ma M, Chen X, Zhou R, et al. Surface microstructure of rice starch is altered by removal of granule-associated proteins. Food Hydrocolloids, 2021, 121:107038.
doi: 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2021.107038
[23] McMaugh S J, Thistleton J L, Anschaw E, et al. Suppression of starch synthase I expression affects the granule morphology and granule size and fine structure of starch in wheat endosperm. Journal of Experimental Botany, 2014, 65(8):2189-2201.
doi: 10.1093/jxb/eru095 pmid: 24634486
[24] 韩展誉, 吴春艳, 许艳秋, 等. 不同施氮水平下灌浆期高温对水稻贮藏蛋白积累及其合成代谢影响. 中国农业科学, 2021, 54(7):1439-1454.
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2021.07.010
[25] Patindol J A, Siebenmorgen T J, Wang Y J. Impact of environmental factors on rice starch structure: A review. Starch- Stärke, 2015, 67(1/2):42-54.
doi: 10.1002/star.v67.1-2
[26] 刘传菊, 李欢欢, 汤尚文, 等. 大米淀粉结构与特性研究进展. 中国粮油学报, 2019, 34(12):107-114.
[27] van Soest J J G, Tournois H, de Wit D, et al. Short-range structure in (partially) crystalline potato starch determined with attenuated total reflectance Fourier-transform IR spectroscopy. Carbohydrate Research, 1995, 279:201-214.
doi: 10.1016/0008-6215(95)00270-7
[28] 杨帆, 钟晓媛, 李秋萍, 等. 再生稻次适宜区迟播栽对不同杂交籼稻淀粉RVA谱的影响. 作物学报, 2021, 47(4):701-713.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2021.02037
[29] 胡雅杰, 吴培, 邢志鹏, 等. 机插方式和密度对水稻主要品质性状及淀粉RVA谱特征的影响. 扬州大学学报(农业与生命科学版), 2017, 38(3):73-82.
[30] 孙健, 岳瑞雪, 钮福祥, 等. 淀粉型甘薯品种直链淀粉含量、糊化特性和乙醇发酵特性的关系. 作物学报, 2012, 38(3):479-486.
[31] 徐涛, 刘方平, 倪才英, 等. 稻鳖共生体系中不同施肥类型对水稻产量和品质的影响. 江苏农业科学, 2021, 49(14):61-65.
[32] Hoover R, Ratnayake W S. Starch characteristics of black bean, chick pea, lentil, navy bean and pinto bean cultivars grown in Canada. Food Chemistry, 2002, 78(4):489-498.
doi: 10.1016/S0308-8146(02)00163-2
[33] 陆大雷, 王德成, 景立权, 等. 基肥配比和拔节期追施氮肥对糯玉米淀粉胶凝和回生特性的影响. 作物学报, 2009, 35(5):867-874.
[34] 刘萍, 陆大雷, 孙建勇, 等. 拔节期追氮对春播和秋播糯玉米淀粉胶凝和回生特性的影响. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2010, 16(3):543-551.
[35] Zhu D, Zhang H, Guo B, et al. Effects of nitrogen level on structure and physicochemical properties of rice starch. Food Hydrocolloids, 2017, 63:525-532.
doi: 10.1016/j.foodhyd.2016.09.042
[36] Zhang W, Yang Q, Xia M, et al. Effects of phosphate fertiliser on the physicochemical properties of Tartary buckwheat (Fagopyrum tataricum (L.) Gaertn.) starch. Food Chemistry, 2020, 307:125543.
doi: 10.1016/j.foodchem.2019.125543
[37] Fredriksson H, Silverio J, Andersson R, et al. The influence of amylose and amylopectin characteristics on gelatinization and retrogradation properties of different starches. Carbohydrate Polymers, 1998, 35(3):119-134.
doi: 10.1016/S0144-8617(97)00247-6
[1] Wang Zhenlong, Su Cuicui, Zhou Qi, Deng Chaochao, Zhou Yanfang. The Effects of Reducing Nitrogen Fertilizer and Applying Organic Fertilizer on the Yield, Quality, and Soil Quality of Helianthus tuberosus L. [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(5): 104-109.
[2] Liu Qiuyuan, Li Meng, Gao Yangguang, Shi Mengyu, Wei Yunfei, Ji Xin, Li Li, Liu Yali, Wang Fujuan. Effects of Different Nitrogen Fertilization Patterns on Yield and Quality of Conventional Japonica Rice under Reduced Nitrogen [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(5): 131-137.
[3] Hu Xinyuan, Liu Yongqiang, Xie Kuizhong, Sun Xiaohua, Luo Aihua. Effects of Organic Fertilizer Replacing Nitrogen Fertilizer on Soil Physical Chemistry Properties and Potato Quality under Continuous Cropping in Arid Area [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(4): 159-164.
[4] Tang Jianpeng, Chen Jingdu, Wen Kai, Zhang Mingwei, Xie Chenglin, Lu Peiling, Min Sigui, Wang Qiluan, Cheng Jiemin. Study on Material Production and Yield Characteristics of Japonica Rice with Good Eating Quality in Rice-Crayfish Farming System [J]. Crops, 2022, 38(4): 115-123.
[5] Zhou Qiancong, Chen Le, Luo Kang, Liu Mengjie, Song Yongping, Xie Xiaobing, Zeng Yongjun. Effects of Nitrogen Panicle Fertilizer Management on Yield and Quality of Hybrid Late Japonica Rice [J]. Crops, 2021, 37(6): 129-133.
[6] Xiong Tinghao, Zi Tao, Zhang Ai, Hu Yuqian, Peng Zhi, Song Haixing. Effects of Different Organic Fertilizer Dosages on Nutrient Utilization and Yield of Rapeseed under Chemical Fertilizer Reduction [J]. Crops, 2021, 37(3): 133-139.
[7] Zhang Jie, Chen Xin, Gao Fangfang, Ma Yajun, Liu Yanyan, Wu Cainü. Effects of Increased Application of Bio-Organic Fertilizer on Yield and Quality of Red Kidney Bean [J]. Crops, 2021, 37(3): 161-166.
[8] Yang Yongqing, Gao Fangfang, Ma Yajun, Chen Xin, Zhang Jie. Effects of Different Fertilizer Treatments on Yield, Quality and Economic Benefit of Foxtail Millet in Dry Farming Area of Shanxi Province [J]. Crops, 2020, 36(4): 195-201.
[9] He Wanchun, Huang Kai, Ling Peng, Chen Zixiong, Wang Jingcai, Pan Xiaochun, Zhang Juanning, Li Pengcheng. Effects of Different Ratio of Organic Fertilizer Nitrogen to Fertilizer Nitrogen on the Absorption Capacity and Morphology of Potato Roots [J]. Crops, 2020, 36(3): 132-136.
[10] Li Guannan,Huang Lihua,Zhang Lu,Chen Jiaxing,Yang Jingmin. Effects of Organic Fertilizer and Straw Returning on Nutrition and Taste Quality of Rice in Saline-Sodic Soil of Northeast China [J]. Crops, 2019, 35(5): 82-88.
[11] Ma Fanfan,Xing Sulin,Gan Manqin,Liu Peishi,Huang Yu,Gan Xiaoyu,Ma Youhua. Effects of Organic Fertilizer Substituting for Chemical Fertilizer on Rice Yield, Soil Fertility and Nitrogen and Phosphorus Loss in Farmland [J]. Crops, 2019, 35(5): 89-96.
[12] Zhou Yun,Li Yongmei,Fan Maopan,Wang Zilin,Xu Zhi,Zhang Dan,Zhao Jixia. Effects of Nitrogen in Organic Manure Replacing Chemical Nitrogenous Fertilizer on Aggregates of Red Soil, Maize Yield and Quality [J]. Crops, 2019, 35(4): 125-132.
[13] Zhang Meng,Gou Jiulan,Wei Quanquan,Chen Long,He Jiafang. Effects of Different Biological Organic Fertilizers on the Growth of Spring Potato and Soil Fertility at High Altitude Region in Guizhou Province [J]. Crops, 2019, 35(3): 132-136.
[14] Yiran Ye, ,Bencai Sha,Wenxiang Wang,Hongda Ye,Shixian Geng,Jingjin Cheng,Meirong Hai. Effects of Different Fertilizers on Photosynthetic Characteristics of Winter Potato [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(3): 135-140.
[15] Haoyu Lu,Hao Wen,Zhenxie Yi,Tiejun Zhou. Effects of Nitrogen Application Rate and Ratio of Inorganic and Organic Fertilizers on Yield Formation and Rice Quality of Purple Rice [J]. Crops, 2017, 33(6): 147-153.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!