Crops ›› 2017, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (6): 147-153.doi: 10.16035/j.issn.1001-7283.2017.06.024

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Effects of Nitrogen Application Rate and Ratio of Inorganic and Organic Fertilizers on Yield Formation and Rice Quality of Purple Rice

Lu Haoyu1,Wen Hao1,Yi Zhenxie1,Zhou Tiejun2   

  1. 1College of Agronomy,Hunan Agricultural University/South Regional Collaborative Innovation Center for Grain and Oil Crops in China,Changsha 410128,Hunan,China
    2Hunan Liangtian Agricultural Science and Technology Development Co.,Ltd,Changsha 410007,Hunan,China
  • Received:2017-07-26 Revised:2017-08-21 Online:2017-12-15 Published:2018-08-26
  • Contact: Zhenxie Yi

RichHTML

3

PDF (PC)

111

Abstract:

The purple rice variety Liangtianzi No.1 was used as the material to study the effects of different nitrogen rate (120kg/hm 2, 150kg/hm 2) and the proportion of inorganic and organic fertilizers (100%∶0, 50%∶50%, 25%∶75%, 0∶100%) on the yield formation characteristics and rice quality of purple rice. The results showed that: (1) With the increment of nitrogen applicatin rate, tillers, spike rate, leaf area and dry matter accumulation were increased, and the yield was increased significantly. At the same time, under the same nitrogen rate, yield of 50%:50% treatment was the highest, the next was 25%∶75% treatment, and yield of 0∶100% treatment was the lowest. (2) Nitrogen application and organic fertilizer could improve the brown rice rate and milled rice rate of purple rice, and the improving effect of 0∶100% treatment was the best, and 50%∶50% treatment was the next. (3) The amylose content in purple rice grain was decreased with the increment of nitrogen application rate and proportion of organic fertilizer. The protein content was increased significantly after application of nitrogen, and which showed the trend of increased firstly and then decreased with the increment of proportion of organic fertilizer, and protein content of purple rice in 25%∶75% treatment was the highest, and followed by 50%∶50% treatment. Nitrogen application significantly increased the content of vitamin B1 in purple rice, organic fertilizer also had certain promotion effect, while the difference was not significant. (4) Effects of the application of pure inorganic fertilizer on content of Se, Zn and Fe of purple rice were not clear, while the improving effect of organic fertilizer on content of Se, Zn and Fe of purple rice was significant, and which was increased with the increment of proportion of organic fertilizer. Therefore, in this study, the nitrogen rate 150kg/hm 2 and proportion of organic fertilizer 50%-75% were advantageous to high yield and quality of purple rice.

Key words: Purple rice, Proportion of inorganic and organic fertilizer, Yield formation, Rice quality

Table 1

Nitrogen application rate and ratio of inorganic and organic fertilizer in different treatments"

处理
Treatment		 施氮量(kg/hm2)
Nitrogen application
rate		 无机肥比例(%)
Proportion of
inorganic fertilizer		 有机肥比例(%)
Proportion of
organic fertilizer
F1 120 100 0
F2 120 50 50
F3 120 25 75
F4 120 0 100
F5 150 100 0
F6 150 50 50
F7 150 25 75
F8 150 0 100
F9(CK) 0 0 0

Fig.1

Dynamics of tillers of population in different fertilization treatments"

Fig.2

Dynamics of tillers per hill in different fertilization treatments"

Table 2

The spike rate in different treatments %"

处理Treatment F1 F2 F3 F4 F5 F6 F7 F8 F9
成穗率Spike rate 71.9a 72.8a 72.2a 71.6a 72.9a 73.2a 72.5a 72.0a 61.3b

Table 3

Leaf area index at different stages in different treatments"

处理Treatment 分蘖盛期Active tillering stage 孕穗期Booting stage 齐穗期Full heading stage 灌浆中期Mid-filling stage
F1 3.88±0.17a 4.53±0.10bc 4.09±0.09c 3.51±0.10c
F2 3.41±0.12b 4.89±0.07ab 4.33±0.11a 3.89±0.13ab
F3 3.25±0.18c 4.61±0.16b 4.13±0.12bc 3.67±0.14b
F4 3.18±0.11c 4.36±0.09c 3.84±0.17d 3.37±0.08d
F5 4.18±0.16a 4.93±0.18ab 4.25±0.13b 3.56±0.18c
F6 3.66±0.12ab 5.17±0.09a 4.41±0.09a 4.02±0.09a
F7 3.31±0.14c 4.66±0.11b 4.19±0.07b 3.83±0.11ab
F8 3.22±0.19c 4.55±0.14b 3.91±0.08d 3.54±0.06c
F9 2.79±0.09d 3.97±0.10d 3.37±0.15e 2.85±0.17e

Table 4

Dry matter accumulation at different stages in different treatments t/hm2"

处理
Treatment		 分蘖盛期
Active tillering stage		 孕穗期
Booting stage		 齐穗期
Full heading stage		 灌浆中期
Mid-filling stage		 成熟期
Maturity stage
F1 2.81±0.07c 6.85±0.16d 8.11±0.13e 9.63±0.09e 10.91±0.09f
F2 2.60±0.09d 6.92±0.08d 8.47±0.07d 10.14±0.12d 11.87±0.16d
F3 2.56±0.05d 6.63±0.09e 8.08±0.08e 9.68±0.08e 11.58±0.11e
F4 2.37±0.06e 6.52±0.08e 7.83±0.11f 9.46±0.14f 11.10±0.12f
F5 3.23±0.06a 7.54±0.07a 9.53±0.07b 11.19±0.07bc 12.25±0.07c
F6 3.06±0.11b 7.68±0.12a 9.67±0.12a 11.46±0.08a 12.94±0.12a
F7 3.01±0.05b 7.39±0.09b 9.58±0.09b 11.26±0.16b 12.66±0.16b
F8 2.88±0.13bc 7.21±0.14c 9.36±0.09c 11.09±0.15c 12.38±0.08c
F9 2.09±0.08f 5.34±0.11f 6.11±0.14g 8.37±0.11g 9.08±0.13g

Table 5

Yield components of purple rice in different treatments"

处理
Treatment		 有效穗(×104/hm2)
Effective panicle		 每穗粒数
Grain per panicle		 结实率(%)
Seed setting rate
 千粒重(g)
1000-grain weight
 理论产量(kg/hm2)
Theoretical yield		 实际产量(kg/hm2)
Actual yield
F1 172±8.1abc 182±13.6d 44.01±0.08e 22.04±0.45d 3 379±59.21d 3 205±47.91de
F2 169±5.6bc 197±15.7ab 47.39±0.09a 22.56±0.39cd 3 688±63.47c 3 559±89.34c
F3 161±2.3c 192±9.8bc 46.28±0.11c 22.75±0.81abc 3 408±29.17d 3 255±86.73d
F4 159±4.2c 196±10.1ab 46.45±0.17bc 22.81±0.47abc 3 241±24.31e 3 128±95.82e
F5 186±4.6a 186±11.3cd 45.55±0.04d 22.36±0.66abc 3 785±32.98c 3 601±64.42c
F6 183±3.4ab 201±12.9a 47.29±0.12ab 23.44±0.59ab 4 209±63.55a 4 077±69.47a
F7 180±5.6abc 195±13.1abc 46.53±0.08bc 23.64±0.62ab 4 001±49.74b 3 861±78.69b
F8 175±6.9abc 191±12.4bc 44.61±0.11e 23.89±0.71a 3 688±57.11c 3 530±63.27c
F9 138±6.7d 172±10.9e 40.19±0.09f 22.14±0.55d 2 218±29.54f 2 016±41.25f

Table 6

Brown rice rate and milled rice rate of purple rice in different treatments ％"

处理
Treatment		 糙米率
Brown rice rate		 精米率
Milled rice rate
F1 80.72b 61.97c
F2 81.25a 62.04c
F3 81.02a 62.54b
F4 81.46a 62.21c
F5 80.85b 62.68ab
F6 81.49a 62.81ab
F7 81.23a 62.58b
F8 81.57a 63.15a
F9 78.71c 58.97d

Table 7

The amylose content in purple rice grain under different treatments ％"

处理Treatment 直链淀粉含量The amylose content
F1 11.21±0.57b
F2 10.51±0.27c
F3 10.33±0.42c
F4 9.53±0.40e
F5 11.13±0.68b
F6 10.07±0.52cd
F7 9.88±0.71d
F8 9.47±0.29e
F9 12.58±0.77a

Table 8

Content of crude protein and VB1 in purple rice grain under different treatments"

处理
Treatment		 粗蛋白含量(%)
Content of crude protein		 维生素B1含量(mg/kg)
Content of VB1
F1 9.14±1.21d 0.0309±0.0007a
F2 9.89±0.77b 0.0314±0.0008a
F3 10.21±0.92a 0.0322±0.0012a
F4 9.66±0.69c 0.0327±0.0011a
F5 9.27±0.32d 0.0310±0.0006a
F6 10.02±0.63ab 0.0329±0.0016a
F7 10.38±0.97a 0.0328±0.0013a
F8 9.52±0.57c 0.0326±0.0009a
F9 8.25±0.81e 0.0287±0.0008b

Table 9

Content of 3 types of trace elements in purple rice grain under different treatments mg/kg"

处理
Treatment		 Se含量
Content of Se		 Zn含量
Content of Zn		 Fe含量
Content of Fe
F1 0.0409±0.0007d 22.078±0.337c 37.551±0.988d
F2 0.0422±0.0011c 23.343±0.471b 40.275±0.417c
F3 0.0444±0.0007b 24.101±0.894a 41.578±0.366b
F4 0.0471±0.0006a 24.388±0.616a 42.299±0.859a
F5 0.0405±0.0003d 22.051±0.266c 37.418±0.722d
F6 0.0432±0.0009c 23.622±0.614b 40.914±1.028c
F7 0.0467±0.0005a 24.244±0.571a 41.671±0.774b
F8 0.0473±0.0012a 24.427±0.411a 42.573±0.616a
F9 0.0402±0.0006d 22.016±0.788c 36.812±0.875e
[1] 韩磊, 汪旭东, 徐建第 , 等. 有色稻米研究现状分析.中国稻米, 2003(5):22-24.
[2] 林蒲田 .红米考. 农业考古, 2000(1):221-225.
[3] 赖来展, 张名位, 彭仲明 , 等. 黑米稻种质资源的评价与利用研究.作物品种资源, 1994(S):58-64.
[4] 卢玉娥, 梁耀懋 . 广西紫米稻品种资源.广西农业科学, 1987(3):10-12.
[5] 王琳琳, 凌文华, 马静 , 等. 黑米皮对高脂诱导的家兔动脉粥样硬化形成的影响. 营养学报, 2002,24(4):372-376.
[6] 余飞, 王恩妹, 顾德法 . 黑紫米提高贫血大鼠血红蛋白作用的研究. 营养学报, 1989,11(2):120-125.
[7] 马静, 凌文华, 葛慧 , 等. 红米对大鼠血脂及抗氧化系统的影响. 营养学报, 1999,21(2):232.
[8] 于广星, 侯守贵, 王友芳 , 等. 国内外水稻施肥技术.土壤肥料, 2005(3):40-42.
[9] 胡星 . 秸秆全量还田与有机无机肥配施对水稻产量形成的影响. 扬州:扬州大学, 2008.
[10] 彭耀林, 朱俊英, 唐建军 , 等. 有机无机肥长期配施对水稻产量及干物质生产特性的影响. 江西农业大学学报, 2004,26(4):485-490.
[11] GB/T 15683-2008《大米直链淀粉含量的测定》.
[12] 曹蕊, 曹玉华, 李楠 , 等. 高效液相色谱法测定米糠中的水溶性维生素.食品科技, 2007(11):157-159.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-9989.2007.11.046
[13] GB 2905 《谷类、豆类作物种子粗蛋白质测定法》.
[14] 李百灵, 周健, 申治国 , 等. ICP-AES和ICP-MS法测定大米中的微量元素.光谱实验室, 2002(5):420-422.
[15] 官春云 . 现代作物栽培学.北京: 高等教育出版社, 2011: 243-245.
[16] 赖来展, 李宝健 . 中华黑米资源的经济特性及其系列食品的营养研究.广东农业科学, 1990(2):5-8.
[17] 王玉娟 . 有色稻与常规粳稻主要农艺性状差异的比较.农业科技通讯, 2015(5):205-208.
[18] 中华人民共和国国家统计局.国家数据.. 2017 -08-14.
[19] 平立燕 . 氮磷钾肥不同配施对水稻产量和效益的影响. 农技服务, 2010,27(2):213-214.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-8421.2010.02.028
[20] 马国武, 于会丰, 冯继东 .施肥量对水稻产量、效益的影响研究 . 现代农业科技, 2010( 14): 52, 54.
[21] 袁隆平超级稻大面积亩产超1000公斤创世界纪录.. 2017 -08-14.
[22] 袁隆平杂交水稻又创世界纪录:高纬度亩产超1000公斤.. 2017 -08-14.
[23] 王艳博, 黄启为, 孟琳 , 等. 有机无机肥配施对菠菜生长和土壤供氮特性的影响. 南京农业大学学报, 2006,29(3):44-48.
[24] 李世清, 凌莉 . 影响土壤中微生物体氮的因子. 土壤与环境, 2000,9(2):158-162.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1674-5906.2000.02.020
[25] 沈芸, 肖鹏, 包劲松 . 水稻营养成分遗传育种研究进展. 核农学报, 2005,22(4):455-460.
[26] 李贺 . 有机-无机肥料配施对水稻养分积累及氮肥利用效率的研究. 沈阳:东北农业大学, 2012.
[27] 贺阳冬, 马均, 魏万蓉 . 不同肥料种类对水稻强化栽培产量及稻米品质的影响. 中国农学通报, 2004,20(6):177-181.
[28] 彭志红, 张冠, 韩成云 , 等. 不同施肥方式对稻米品质及产量的影响.现代农业科技, 2010(16):68-70.
[29] 成明华, 关东胜, 张慧敏 , 等. 10种稻米的品质分析.粮油食品科技, 2001(6):13-16.
[30] GB/T17891-1999《优质稻谷》.
[31] 王康君, 葛立立, 范苗苗 , 等. 稻米蛋白质含量及其影响因素的研究进展.作物杂志, 2011(6):1-6.
[32] 周丽慧, 刘巧泉, 张昌泉 , 等. 水稻种子蛋白质含量及组分在品种间的变异与分布. 作物学报, 2009,35(5):884-891.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2009.00884
[1] Lili Zhang,Yizhou Zhao,Xin Li,Ting Mao,Yan Liu,Zhan Zhang,Shanjun Ni,Fucai Liu. Mutant Analysis on Quality Trait of Different Japonica Rice Progenies Induced by 60Co-γ Ray Irradiation [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(3): 51-56.
[2] Shengquan Zhang,Zhaobo Chen,Zheng Wang,Liping Ren,Xinhuan Gao,Zhijie Ye,Fengting Zhang. Analysis of Population Structure and Yield Formation in Two-Line Hybrid Wheat [J]. Crops, 2017, 33(6): 45-49.
[3] Pingping Chen,Jing Yang,Juan Li,Naimei Tu,Zhenxie Yi. Study on Interaction Effects of Fertilizer and Density on Late Rice after Tobacco in Tobacco-Rice Rotation System in Changsha Tobacco Area [J]. Crops, 2016, 32(6): 79-84.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] Guangcai Zhao,Xuhong Chang,Demei Wang,Zhiqiang Tao,Yanjie Wang,Yushuang Yang,Yingjie Zhu. General Situation and Development of Wheat Production[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 1 -7 .
[2] Baoquan Quan,Dongmei Bai,Yuexia Tian,Yunyun Xue. Effects of Different Leaf-Peg Ratio on Photosynthesis and Yield of Peanut[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 102 -105 .
[3] Xuefang Huang,Mingjing Huang,Huatao Liu,Cong Zhao,Juanling Wang. Effects of Annual Precipitation and Population Density on Tiller-Earing and Yield of Zhangzagu 5 under Film Mulching and Hole Sowing[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 106 -113 .
[4] Wenhui Huang, Hui Wang, Desheng Mei. Research Progress on Lodging Resistance of Crops[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 13 -19 .
[5] Yun Zhao,Cailong Xu,Xu Yang,Suzhen Li,Jing Zhou,Jicun Li,Tianfu Han,Cunxiang Wu. Effects of Sowing Methods on Seedling Stand and Production Profit of Summer Soybean under Wheat-Soybean System[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 114 -120 .
[6] Mei Lu,Min Sun,Aixia Ren,Miaomiao Lei,Lingzhu Xue,Zhiqiang Gao. Effects of Spraying Foliar Fertilizers on Dryland Wheat Growth and the Correlation with Yield Formation[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 121 -125 .
[7] Xiaofei Wang,Haijun Xu,Mengqiao Guo,Yu Xiao,Xinyu Cheng,Shuxia Liu,Xiangjun Guan,Yaokun Wu,Weihua Zhao,Guojiang Wei. Effects of Sowing Date, Density and Fertilizer Utilization Rate on the Yield of Oilseed Perilla frutescens in Cold Area[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 126 -130 .
[8] Pengjin Zhu,Xinhua Pang,Chun Liang,Qinliang Tan,Lin Yan,Quanguang Zhou,Kewei Ou. Effects of Cold Stress on Reactive Oxygen Metabolism and Antioxidant Enzyme Activities of Sugarcane Seedlings[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 131 -137 .
[9] Jie Gao,Qingfeng Li,Qiu Peng,Xiaoyan Jiao,Jinsong Wang. Effects of Different Nutrient Combinations on Plant Production and Nitrogen, Phosphorus and Potassium Utilization Characteristics in Waxy Sorghum[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 138 -142 .
[10] Na Shang,Zhongxu Yang,Qiuzhi Li,Huihui Yin,Shihong Wang,Haitao Li,Tong Li,Han Zhang. Response of Cotton with Vegetative Branches to Plant Density in the Western of Shandong Province[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 143 -148 .