Crops ›› 2023, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (5): 145-150.doi: 10.16035/j.issn.1001-7283.2023.05.021

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Effects of Different Mulching Modes on Soil Moisture, Temperature and Yield of Potato in Dry Land

Zhang Rong1(), Chen Xiaowen1(), Lu Ping1, You Yanrong2, Zhou Delu2, Li Deming3   

  1. 1Agricultural Technology Extension Center of Tongwei County, Dingxi 743300, Gansu, China
    2Gansu Agricultural Technology Extension Station, Lanzhou 730020, Gansu, China
    3Dingxi Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Dingxi 743099, Gansu, China
  • Received:2022-04-01 Revised:2022-07-12 Online:2023-10-15 Published:2023-10-16

RichHTML

4

PDF (PC)

88

Abstract:

In order to explore the effects of different mulching planting modes on potato yield and soil water and temperature in northwest semi-arid area, field experiments were conducted to study the effects of different mulching planting modes [straw crushing and mulching (T1), full film ridge (T2), half film flat mulching (T3) and open field flat planting (CK)] on soil water and temperature, yield and water use efficiency in local potato fields. The results showed that compared with CK, T1, T2 and T3 treatments could significantly increase the average soil water storage from emergence to maturity of potato by 7.7%, 3.4% and 1.5%, respectively, and the increase of soil moisture in the lower layer of soil layer was the largest. Compared with CK, T1 treatment significantly reduced the soil temperature of potato in each growth period and soil layer by 1.3℃ and 1.4℃, respectively, while the soil temperature of T2 and T3 treatments in the whole growth period was significantly higher than that of CK by 1.3℃ and 1.0℃, respectively. Compared with CK, mulching significantly improved the weight of single potato and the rate of commercial potato, and the increase was the largest in T1 treatment. Mulching significantly improved potato yield and water use efficiency. The yields of T1, T2 and T3 treatments were higher than CK by 18.9%, 17.7% and 13.9%, respectively, and the water use efficiency increased by 16.3%, 15.7% and 11.9%, respectively. Considering the soil moisture and temperature use status, yield and water use efficiency of potato field, straw crushing and mulching was a high-yield and efficient planting method, which can significantly improve the potato yield and water use efficiency in dry farming area. It was suitable for potato production in dry farming area.

Key words: Straw crushing mulching, Plastic film mulching, Potato, Soil moisture and temperature, Yield

Fig.1

Schematic diagram of potato field planting"

Fig.2

Soil water storage at potato growth stage SW: sowing stage, SD: seedling stage, BD: squaring stage, FL: florescence stage, TE: tuber enlargement stage, SA: starch accumulation stage, MT: maturation stage. Different lowercase letters indicate significant difference between treatments (P < 0.05). The same below"

Fig.3

Soil moisture of potato in all soil layers during the whole period"

Fig.4

Soil temperature at different growth stages of potato"

Fig.5

Soil temperature of potato in all soil layers during the whole period"

Table 1

Effects of different treatments on potato yield"

处理
Treatment		 产量
Yield (kg/hm2)		 单株结薯数
Number of potatoes per plant		 单薯鲜重
Single fresh potato weight (g)		 商品薯率
Commodity potato rate (%)		 WUE
[kg/mm·hm2]
T1 39 470.3±480.3a 5.5±0.3a 135.6±6.6a 87.3±1.8a 127.9±1.6a
T2 39 071.0±381.6a 5.8±0.4a 128.7±15.2a 75.2±2.5b 127.2±1.2a
T3 37 800.8±164.1b 5.8±0.3a 119.9±3.6a 74.1±1.9b 123.1±0.9a
CK 33 186.8±960.6c 6.2±0.5a 98.9±8.3b 69.9±2.5b 109.9±2.2b
[1] 袁笑瑞. 西北内陆河最严格水资源管理法律制度践行研究. 西安:长安大学, 2015.
[2] 达存莹, 岳云, 贾秀苹. 甘肃省马铃薯产业发展现状及主粮化发展分析. 中国农业资源与区划, 2016(3):38-42.
[3] 雷俊, 张凯, 姚玉璧, 等. 半干旱区黑膜覆盖对马铃薯光合特性及产量的影响. 干旱气象, 2017, 35(6):1036-1041.
[4] 王红丽, 张绪成, 于显枫, 等. 黑色地膜覆盖的土壤水热效应及其对马铃薯产量的影响. 生态学报, 2016, 36(16):5215-5226.
[5] 马建涛, 程宏波, 柴守玺. 覆盖方式对旱地不同熟性马铃薯产量及土壤水分的影响. 甘肃农业大学学报, 2019, 54(2):55-64.
[6] 陈东城. 我国农用地膜应用现状及展望. 甘蔗糖业, 2014(4):50-54.
[7] 严昌荣, 刘恩科, 舒帆, 等. 我国地膜覆盖和残留污染特点与防控技术. 农业资源与环境学报, 2014, 31(2):95-102.
[8] 卜玉山, 苗果园, 周乃健, 等. 地膜和秸秆覆盖土壤肥力效应分析与比较. 中国农业科学, 2006, 39(5):1069-1075.
[9] 宋晓, 李瑜玲, 陈莉, 等. 秸秆覆盖还田对农田土壤蓄水能力及粮食产量的影响. 河北农业科学, 2014, 18(6):42-44.
[10] 霍轶珍, 丁春莲, 银花, 等. 不同材料覆盖对马铃薯田土壤水热状况及产量的影响. 干旱区资源与环境, 2019, 33(1):90-94.
[11] 钱玉平, 田慧慧, 程宏波, 等. 秸秆覆盖及播种方式对马铃薯耗水特性和产量的影响. 中国生态农业学报(中英文), 2020, 28(6):826-834.
[12] Hou X, Li R, He W, et al. Effects of planting density on potato growth,yield,and water use efficiency during years with variable rainfall on the Loess Plateau, China. Agricultural Water Management, 2020, 230:105982.
doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2019.105982
[13] Chen Y Z, Chai S X, Tian H H, et al. Straw strips mulch on furrows improves water use efficiency and yield of potato in a rainfed semiarid area. Agricultural Water Management, 2019, 211(1):142-151.
doi: 10.1016/j.agwat.2018.09.048
[14] 于庆峰, 苗庆丰, 史海滨, 等. 秸秆覆盖量对土壤温度和春玉米耗水规律及产量的影响. 水土保持研究, 2018, 25(3):111-116.
[15] 胡广荣, 王琦, 宋兴阳, 等. 沟覆盖材料对垄沟集雨种植土壤温度、作物产量和水分利用效率的影响. 中国生态农业学报, 2016, 24(5):590-599.
[16] 程宏波, 牛建彪, 柴守玺, 等. 不同覆盖材料和方式对旱地春小麦产量及土壤水温环境的影响. 草业学报, 2016, 25(2):47-57.
doi: 10.11686/cyxb2015395
[17] 禇国江. 马铃薯大垄密栽培法. 农民致富之友, 2015(19):24.
[18] 李博文, 杨长刚, 兰雪梅, 等. 秸秆带状覆盖对旱地冬小麦产量的影响. 干旱地区农业研究, 2017, 35(2):14-20.
[19] 王芳, 程宏波, 李瑞, 等. 秸秆带状覆盖对旱地冬小麦土壤温度及产量的影响. 麦类作物学报, 2017, 37(6):777-785.
[20] 李守蕾. 旱地秸秆带状覆盖不同覆盖量对冬小麦土壤水热变化的影响. 兰州:甘肃农业大学, 2016.
[21] 买自珍, 佘萍, 买娟, 等. 半干旱区不同覆膜时期、方式与膜色对土壤水分及马铃薯水分利用效率的影响. 干旱地区农业研究, 2014, 32(1):1-10.
[22] Zhou J, Wang C, Zhang H, et al. Effect of water saving management practices and nitrogen fertilizer rate on crop yield and water use efficiency in a winter wheat-summer maize cropping system. Field Crops Research, 2011, 122(2):157-163.
doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2011.03.009
[23] 黄彩霞, 赵德明, 柴守玺, 等. 播期对秸秆带状覆盖下冬小麦干物质积累、产量及水分利用效率的影响. 麦类作物学报, 2017, 37(12):1604-1610.
[24] 陈玉章, 田慧慧, 李亚伟, 等. 秸秆带状沟覆垄播对旱地马铃薯产量和水分利用效率的影响. 作物学报, 2019, 45(5):714-727.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2019.84097
[25] 马建涛, 陈玉章, 程宏波, 等. 覆盖方式对旱地不同熟性马铃薯土壤水热特征和产量的影响. 灌溉排水学报, 2020, 39(7):7-16.
[1] Wang Zhenlong, Su Cuicui, Zhou Qi, Deng Chaochao, Zhou Yanfang. The Effects of Reducing Nitrogen Fertilizer and Applying Organic Fertilizer on the Yield, Quality, and Soil Quality of Helianthus tuberosus L. [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(5): 104-109.
[2] Liu Yan, Qu Hang, Xing Yuehua, Wang Xiaohui, Gong Liang. Effects of New Types of Nitrogen Fertilizer on Rice Growth, Nitrogen Use Efficiency and Economic Benefit [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(5): 110-116.
[3] Liu Qiuyuan, Li Meng, Gao Yangguang, Shi Mengyu, Wei Yunfei, Ji Xin, Li Li, Liu Yali, Wang Fujuan. Effects of Different Nitrogen Fertilization Patterns on Yield and Quality of Conventional Japonica Rice under Reduced Nitrogen [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(5): 131-137.
[4] Yang Mei, Yang Weijun, Gao Wencui, Jia Yonghong, Zhang Jinshan. Effects of Combined Application of Biochar and Nitrogen Fertilizer on Dry Matter Transport, Agronomic Characteristics and Yield of Winter Wheat in Irrigation Area [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(5): 138-144.
[5] Wu Xueqin, Liu Kaiyu, Han Chunhua, Alimujiang·Kelaimu , Cui Yannan, Li Jiangyu, Ma Chunmei, Zhong Wenfan, Zhao Qiang. Effects of 14% Thiobenzene-Dioxalon on Defoliation Ripening, Yield and Quality of Cotton [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(5): 164-169.
[6] Guan Qinglin, Piao Shengyuan, Zhang Siwei, Wang Jun, Lei Yunkang, Zhong Qiu, Zhao Mingqin. Effects of Combined Application of Medium-Trace Elements on Photosynthetic Characteristics, Carbon and Nitrogen Metabolism, Yield and Quality of Cigar Tobacco [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(5): 187-196.
[7] Tian Xiaoqin, Wang Dan, Li Zhuo, Liu Yonghong, Li Wei. Effects of Ridge and Mulching on Yield and Water Use Efficiency of Rapeseed [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(5): 204-211.
[8] Yi Bing, Liu Jingang, Song Dianxiu, Wang Dexing, Zhao Mingzhu, Liu Xiaohong, Sun Enyu, Cui Liangji. Study on Land Productivity and Interspecific Competition of Sunflower and Millet Intercropping in Arid Areas [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(5): 219-223.
[9] Zhao Weizhe, Du Chunfang, Sun Xuan, Yao Lin, Xian Shuanshi, Zhang Gaoyang. Effects of Stalk Picking on Economic Characteristics and Yield of Oilseed and Vegetable Rape [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(5): 224-230.
[10] Liu Hui, Long Xueyi, Jiao Yan, Wang Lihong. Effects of Combined Application of Biochar and Phosphate Fertilizer on Rice Growth and Yield [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(5): 238-248.
[11] Cao Qingjun, Li Gang, Yang Hao, Lou Yuyong, Yang Fentuan, Kong Fanli, Li Xinbei, Zhao Xinkai, Jiang Xiaoli. The Effects of Different Tillage Practices on Seedbed Quality and Its Relationships with Seedling Population Construction and Grain Yield of Spring Maize [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(5): 249-254.
[12] Zhang Dongxu, Hu Danzhu, Yan Jinlong, Feng Liyun, Wu Zhiyuan, Zhang Junling, Li Yanhua. Effects of Spraying Streptomyces on Yield and Photosynthetic Characteristics of Late-Sown Wheat under Different Crop Rotations [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(5): 255-263.
[13] Zhang Shangpei, Yang Junxue, Luo Shiwu, Wang Yong, Zhang Xiaojuan, Cheng Bingwen. Genetic Diversity and Yielding Ability Analysis of Agronomic Traits in Broom Corn Millet [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(5): 37-42.
[14] Zheng Fei, Chen Jing, Cui Yakun, Kong Lingjie, Meng Qingchang, Li Jie, Liu Ruixiang, Zhang Meijing, Zhao Wenming, Chen Yanping. Screening of High and Stable Yield Maize Varieties Suitable for Grain Mechanical Harvesting in Different Ecological Areas of the Huaibei Region [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(4): 110-117.
[15] Zhang Mingwei, Ding Jinfeng, Zhu Xinkai, Guo Wenshan. Analysis of High-Yielding Planting Density and Nitrogen Application in Super-Late Sowing Wheat Following Rice [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(4): 126-135.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!