Crops ›› 2021, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (3): 126-132.doi: 10.16035/j.issn.1001-7283.2021.03.019

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Effects of Transplanting Dates and Mulching Methods on Dry Matter Accumulation and Economic Characteristics of Dark Sun-Cured Tobacco in Jiaohe

Chen Chengli1(), Wang Jing1, Fu Quanshan2, Hou Zhenwu2, Jiang Weifeng1, Li Liping3, Guo Shuyang2, Rao Chaoqi1,4, Fu Yunpeng1()   

  1. 1College of Tobacco Science, Henan Agricultural University, Zhengzhou 450002, Henan, China
    2Jilin Jiaohe Tobacco Co., Ltd., Jiaohe 132500, Jilin, China
    3Meteorological Bureau of Jiaohe, Jiaohe 132500, Jilin, China
    4Jiangxi Tobacco Industry Co., Ltd., Nanchang 330000, Jiangxi, China
  • Received:2020-12-10 Revised:2021-04-15 Online:2021-06-15 Published:2021-06-22
  • Contact: Fu Yunpeng E-mail:874714703@qq.com;yunpengfu@henau.edu.cn

RichHTML

2

PDF (PC)

224

Abstract:

To reveal the effects of different transplanting dates and mulching methods on the relationship between the dynamic characteristics of dry matter accumulation and effective accumulated temperature of dark sun-cured tobacco, the local sun-cured tobacco variety, Piaohe No. 1, was used as the plant material to study the effects of three transplanting periods (May 24, May 29, June 4) and two coverage methods (no coverage and mulching method) on the growth period of dark sun-cured tobacco, effective accumulated temperature, dry matter accumulation characteristics, and tobacco economic properties. The results showed that advancing date could extend the root spreading period of dark sun-cured tobacco. Advancing the transplanting date and mulching film could extend the days of maturity period, improve the effective accumulation temprature and dry matter accumulation before harvest of dark sun-cured tobacco. Effective accumulative temperature and rapid increase period begin and end the accumulated temperature during the rapid increase period were both advanced, the average accumulation rate of dry matter decreased and the accumulation of dry matter during the rapid increase period inceased. When the transplanting date was advanced, the yield of each treatment decreased, and the output value first raised and then decreased. The proportion and average price of equal cigarettes had gradually increased. Correlation analysis showed that the average dry matter accumulation rate and the accumulated temperature of the peak dry matter accumulation rate were crucial to the formation of economic properties of dark sun-cured tobacco. Therefore, Jiaohe sun-cured tobacco should be transplanted from May 24 to May 29 and cultivated with plastic film mulching.

Key words: Dark sun-cured tobacco, Transplanting date, Mulching method, Dry matter accumulation, Logistic model, Economic characteristics

Table 1

Comparison of dark sun-cured tobacco field growth period with different treatments d"

处理
Treatment		 伸根期
Root spreading period		 旺长期
Fast growing period		 成熟期
Maturity period		 大田生育期
Field growth period
A1B1 32a 24b 40b 96a
A1B2 24c 26ab 44a 94ab
A2B1 30a 24b 43ab 97a
A2B2 23cd 26ab 42ab 91bc
A3B1 27b 27a 40b 94ab
A3B2 20d 27a 41ab 88c

Table 2

Comparison of effective accumulated temperature of dark sun-cured tobacco with different treatments ℃"

处理
Treatment		 伸根期
Root spreading
period		 旺长期
Fast growing
period		 成熟期
Maturity
period		 大田生育期
Field growth
period
A1B1 248.8a 272.1b 487.8bc 1008.7a
A1B2 183.8b 269.6b 542.9a 996.3ab
A2B1 239.6a 278.8b 495.5b 1013.9a
A2B2 166.6b 283.9b 512.6ab 963.1bc
A3B1 232.2a 325.5a 448.4c 1006.1a
A3B2 162.1b 293.9b 497.4b 953.4c

Fig.1

Change of dry matter accumulation of dark sun-cured tobacco with effective accumulated temperature after transplanting under different treatment conditions"

Table 3

Model coefficients of dry matter accumulation of dark sun-cured tobacco with different treatments"

处理
Treatment		 参数Parameter 决定系数（R2）
Determination coefficient
a b c
A1B1 6339.136 86.197 0.0081 0.9953**
A1B2 6434.047 140.306 0.0115 0.9970**
A2B1 6300.546 78.298 0.0091 0.9951**
A2B2 6700.594 78.340 0.0103 0.9954**
A3B1 6784.616 87.688 0.0091 0.9949**
A3B2 7447.385 71.180 0.0094 0.9968**

Fig.2

Comparison of the accumulation rate of dry matter of dark sun-cured tobacco with different treatments"

Table 4

Characteristics of derivative parameters of dry matter accumulation of dark sun-cured tobacco with different treatments"

处理
Treatment		 干物质平均
积累速率
Average
accumulation
rate of dry matter
[kg/(hm2·℃)]		 速率峰值参数
Parameters of maximum rate		 快增期
Rapid growing stage
速率峰值
Maximum rate
[kg/(hm2·℃)]		 出现积温
The temperature of
occurrence (℃)		 开始积温
Accumulating
temperature
at beginning (℃)		 结束积温
Accumulating
temperature
at ending (℃)		 持续积温
Continuous
accumulated
temperature (℃)		 干物质积累量
Dry matter
accumulation
(kg/hm2)
A1B1 6.03 12.79 552.14 484.09 715.31 231.22 2661.84
A1B2 6.65 18.41 431.87 383.89 546.92 163.03 2697.85
A2B1 6.13 14.30 480.20 419.70 625.22 205.52 2644.37
A2B2 6.76 17.25 423.55 370.20 551.45 181.25 2814.80
A3B1 6.41 15.48 490.29 430.09 634.61 204.52 2841.06
A3B2 7.05 17.58 451.64 393.47 591.09 197.62 3118.02
FA 53.610** 12.858** 12.858** 16.854** 6.640* 0.599 71.589**
FB 381.280** 125.185** 125.185** 129.914** 97.878** 32.283** 52.894**
FA×FB 0.407 14.652** 14.652** 12.421** 15.189** 9.962** 9.372

Table 5

Comparison of economic characteristics of dark sun-cured tobacco with different treatments"

处理
Treatment		 产量
Yield (kg/hm2)		 产值（元/hm2）
Output value (yuan/hm2)		 均价（元/kg）
Average price (yuan/kg)		 上等烟比例
Proportion of premium smoke (%)
A1B1 2848.80c 40 366.36c 14.17a 56.00c
A1B2 3220.20ab 47 458.66a 14.74a 65.00a
A2B1 3104.10b 44 102.43b 14.21a 53.00c
A2B2 3313.65a 48 055.88a 14.50a 60.00b
A3B1 3127.35b 43 376.97b 13.87a 44.00d
A3B2 3372.45a 47 697.23a 14.14a 55.00c
FA 1.630 0.784 0.323 12.301**
FB 7.085* 12.137** 0.626 24.106**
FA×FB 0.225 0.454 0.039 0.397

Table 6

Correlation between dry matter accumulation derived parameters and economic characteristics"

经济性状
Economic characteristic		 干物质平均
积累速率
Average accumulation
rate of dry matter		 速率峰值参数
Parameters of maximum rate		 快增期
Rapid growing stage
速率峰值
Maximum rate		 出现积温
The temperature
of occurrence		 持续积温
Continuous accumulated
temperature		 干物质积累量
Dry matter
accumulation
产量Yield 0.658** 0.526* -0.626** -0.345 0.546*
产值Output value 0.760** 0.701** -0.787** -0.555* 0.539*
均价Average price 0.110 0.234 -0.334 -0.302 -0.125
上等烟比例Proprtion of premium smoke 0.293 0.412 -0.536* -0.491* -0.155
[1] 周金仙 . 不同生态条件下烟草品种产量与品质的变化. 烟草科技, 2005(9):32-35.
[2] 许自成, 黎妍妍, 肖汉乾 , 等. 湘南烟区生态因素与烤烟质量的综合评价. 植物生态学报, 2008(1):226-234.
[3] 陈钊, 魏子全, 张骞 , 等. 移栽期对烤烟品种龙江851生长规律的影响. 现代化农业, 2011(8):25-28.
[4] 刘德玉, 李树峰, 罗德华 , 等. 移栽期对烤烟产量、质量和光合特性的影响. 中国烟草学报, 2007,13(3):40-46.
[5] 黄一兰, 陈顺辉, 李文卿 . 揭膜时期对烟株生长及烟叶产质量的影响. 烟草科技, 2003(7):33-35,48.
[6] 刘国顺 . 烟草栽培学. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2003:53-55.
[7] 赵兵飞, 孙双, 侯振武 , 等. 不同氮钾配比对晒红烟碳氮代谢及化学成分的影响. 作物杂志, 2018(2):73-79.
[8] 马波波, 王梦雅, 王娟 , 等. 种植密度对晒红烟田间光照强度及烟叶产质量的影响. 华北农学报, 2016,31(6):125-130.
[9] 郎彬 . 延边晒红烟主推品种田间及调制时期生理生化指标变化规律研究. 延吉: 延边大学, 2019.
[10] 国家烟草专卖局. YC/T 142—2010 烟草农艺性状调查测量方法. 北京: 中国标准出版社. 2011.
[11] 闫新甫 . 中外烟叶等级标准研究与应用指南. 北京: 中国质检出版社,中国标准出版社. 2012.
[12] 朱英华, 周可金, 张国 , 等. 烤烟硫营养对钙吸收与积累的影响. 中国烟草学报, 2014,20(2):59-64.
[13] 普雪可, 吴春花, 勉有明 , 等. 不同覆盖方式对旱作马铃薯生长及土壤水热特征的影响. 中国农业科学, 2020,53(4):734-747.
[14] 郭笑恒, 魏烁果, 王晓丽 , 等. 不同覆膜种类和还苗期灌溉方式对襄阳山区烟草生长发育的影响. 作物杂志, 2020(5):154-163.
[15] 李文卿, 陈顺辉, 林晓路 . 不同覆膜移栽方式对烤烟生长发育的影响. 中国农学通报, 2013,29(7):138-142.
[16] 吴疆, 杨兴友, 靳冬梅 , 等. 调节移栽期对四川达州白肋烟生育期气候指标的影响. 中国烟草科学, 2014,35(2):83-87.
[17] 陈军 . 地膜覆盖对烤烟生长发育和养分吸收的影响. 长沙: 湖南农业大学, 2003.
[18] 王发勇, 袁清华, 廖宜树 , 等. 栽培措施对烤烟生育进程的影响研究进展. 中国烟草科学, 2016,37(2):89-94.
[19] 黄一兰, 李文卿, 陈顺辉 , 等. 移栽期对烟株生长、各部位烟叶比例及产、质量的影响. 烟草科技, 2001(11):38-40.
[20] 祖朝龙, 徐经上, 殷凤生 , 等. 皖南烟区烤烟移栽适期的研究. 安徽农业科学, 2004(5):969-970.
[21] 李文卿, 陈顺辉, 柯玉琴 , 等. 不同移栽期对烤烟生长发育及质量风格的影响. 中国烟草学报, 2013,19(4):48-54.
[22] 招启柏, 廖文程, 孔光辉 , 等. 移栽期对烤烟叶片生长动态的影响及其模型的建立. 中国烟草学报, 2013,19(4):41-47,54.
[23] 魏廷邦, 胡发龙, 赵财 , 等. 氮肥后移对绿洲灌区玉米干物质积累和产量构成的调控效应. 中国农业科学, 2017,50(15):2916-2927.
[24] 刘娟, 熊淑萍, 杨阳 , 等. 基于归一化法的小麦干物质积累动态预测模型. 生态学报, 2012,32(17):5512-5520.
[25] 李向岭, 赵明, 李从锋 , 等. 播期和密度对玉米干物质积累动态的影响及其模型的建立. 作物学报, 2010,36(12):2143-2153.
[26] 高真真, 刘扣珠, 史宏志 , 等. 移栽期和采收期对豫中烤烟上六片叶发育期温度指标的影响. 中国烟草科学, 2019,40(1):49-57.
[27] 张兵兵, 吴航, 杨璐 , 等. 基于归一化法模拟分析东北地区春玉米干物质积累对播期和品种的动态响应. 中国农业气象, 2019,40(6):357-367.
[28] 孙仕军, 姜浩, 陈志君 , 等. 不同颜色地膜覆盖下春玉米主要生长性状对耕层积温的响应. 草业学报, 2019,28(2):61-72.
[29] 高真真, 刘扣珠, 李建华 , 等. 成熟期积温对豫中烟区浓香型烤烟上六片产质量的影响. 中国烟草学报, 2019,25(6):38-49.
[30] 吴晓丽, 汤永禄, 李朝苏 , 等. 不同生育时期渍水对冬小麦旗叶叶绿素荧光及籽粒灌浆特性的影响. 中国生态农业学报, 2015,23(3):309-318.
[31] 徐田军, 吕天放, 赵久然 , 等. 玉米籽粒灌浆特性对播期的响应. 应用生态学报, 2016,27(8):2513-2519.
[32] 钱春荣, 王荣焕, 赵久然 , 等. 玉米果穗不同位势子粒灌浆特性分析. 玉米科学, 2017,25(3):80-86.
[33] 魏廷邦, 柴强, 王伟民 , 等. 水氮耦合及种植密度对绿洲灌区玉米光合作用和干物质积累特征的调控效应. 中国农业科学, 2019,52(3):428-444.
[34] 刘红杰, 倪永静, 任德超 , 等. 不同基因型冬小麦籽粒灌浆特征及其与千粒重的关系. 中国农业气象, 2019,40(10):630-636.
[35] 李丰, 周宏美, 赵秀峰 , 等. 播种期对周麦18号籽粒灌浆特性及产量构成的影响. 山东农业科学, 2010(5):29-32.
[1] Gao Jie, Feng Guangcai, Li Xiaorong, Li Qingfeng, Wang Can, Zhang Guobing, Zhou Lengbo, Peng Qiu. Effects of Nitrogen Fertilizer on Yield and Nitrogen Use Characteristics in Waxy Sorghum Cultivar "Hongyingzi" [J]. Crops, 2021, 37(4): 118-122.
[2] Liu Tianhao, Zhang Yifei, Wang Huaipeng, Yang Kejun, Zhang Jinsong, Sun Yishan, Xiao Shanshan, Xu Rongqiong, Du Jiarui, Li Jiayu, Peng Cheng, Wang Baosheng. Regulating Effects of Foliar Spraying Silicon Fertilizer on Dry Matter Accumulation and Translocation, Grain Yield and Quality of Maize in Cold Region [J]. Crops, 2021, 37(4): 112-117.
[3] Wang Dequan, Sun Yanguo, Du Yuhai, Liu Yang, Wang Yi, Ma Xinghua, Zhang Yuqin, Zhang Riqiang. Effects of Transplanting Date and Mode on Growth, Development, Yield and Quality of Flue-Cured Tobacco [J]. Crops, 2021, 37(2): 87-95.
[4] Ren Yun, Liu Jing, Li Zhexin, Li Qiang. Root Morphology and Dry Matter Accumulation of Maize Seedlings in Response to Low Iron Stress [J]. Crops, 2020, 36(6): 69-79.
[5] Li Qiang, Kong Fanlei, Yuan Jichao. Effects of Interannual Meteorological Factors on Maize Dry Matter Accumulation and Yield in the Hilly Area of Southwest China [J]. Crops, 2020, 36(4): 150-157.
[6] Gao Jie,Li Qingfeng,Li Xiaorong,Feng Guangcai,Peng Qiu. Analysis of the Characteristics of Dry Matter Production and Light Energy Utilization of Waxy Sorghum Applied in Different Eras in Guizhou Province [J]. Crops, 2020, 36(1): 41-46.
[7] Shuai Jingtong,Pei Xiaodong,Li Juan,Zhang Yiyang. Effects of Furrowing and Ridging Measures on the Quality of Tobacco-Planting Soils and Output Value of Flue-Cured Tobacco [J]. Crops, 2019, 35(6): 114-119.
[8] Ren Yongfeng,Lu Zhanyuan,Zhao Peiyi,Gao Yu,Liu Guanghua,Li Yanfang. Effects of Different Planting Methods on Water Utilization and Yield of Potato in Dryland [J]. Crops, 2019, 35(5): 120-124.
[9] Zhang Haibin,Meng Meilian,Liu Kunyu,Zhang Lingxiang,Chen Youjun. Effects of Different Rotation Patterns on Dry Matter Accumulation, Disease Occurrence and Yield of Potato [J]. Crops, 2019, 35(4): 170-175.
[10] Duan Junjun,Liu Qingfeng,Ren Chunyuan,Yu Song,Yu Lihe,Guo Wei, ,Liang Haiyun. Effects of Different Cultivation Patterns and Densities on Yield and Dry Matter Accumulation of Common Bean [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(6): 110-115.
[11] Sui Yanghui,Gao Jiping,Liu Caihong,Xu Zhengjin,Wang Yanbo,Zhao Haiyan. Effects of Straw Incorporation Modes on Rice Photosynthesis, Dry Matter Accumulation and Nitrogen Uptake in Cool Region of Northeast China [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(5): 137-143.
[12] Baoquan Quan,Dongmei Bai,Yuexia Tian,Yunyun Xue. Effects of Different Leaf-Peg Ratio on Photosynthesis and Yield of Peanut [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 102-105.
[13] Na Shang,Zhongxu Yang,Qiuzhi Li,Huihui Yin,Shihong Wang,Haitao Li,Tong Li,Han Zhang. Response of Cotton with Vegetative Branches to Plant Density in the Western of Shandong Province [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 143-148.
[14] Bingfei Zhao,Shuang Sun,Zhenwu Hou,Yunpeng Fu,Quanshan Fu,Yongfeng Yang,Jing Wang,Yongcheng Huang. Effects of Different Ratio of N to K on Carbon-Nitrogen Metabolism and Chemical Constituents of Dark Sun-Cured Tobacco [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(2): 73-79.
[15] Mingcong Zhang,Yingce Zhan,Songyu He,Xijun Jin,Mengxue Wang,Chunyuan Ren,Yuxian Zhang. Effects of Different Nitrogen Fertilizer and Density Level on Dry Matter Accumulation and Yield of Adzuki Bean [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(1): 141-146.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!