Crops ›› 2024, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (4): 188-193.doi: 10.16035/j.issn.1001-7283.2024.04.024

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Salt Tolerance Evaluation of New Mung Bean Varieties at Germination Stage

Li Shiqing1,2(), Zhang Peng1, Gong Dan1, Wang Suhua1, Zhang Yaowen2, Wang Lixia1,2()   

  1. 1Institute of Crop Sciences, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China
    2College of Agronomy, Shanxi Agricultural University, Taigu 030801, Shanxi, China
  • Received:2023-05-05 Revised:2023-06-29 Online:2024-08-15 Published:2024-08-14

RichHTML

2

PDF (PC)

189

Abstract:

Assessment of salt tolerance of mung bean varieties would be beneficial to utilization in saline lands. Zhonglü 26 and Zhonglü 27 were used as experimental materials, and Zhonglü 5 was used as a reference. Different concentrations (0.0, 0.3%, 0.5%, 0.7%, and 0.9%) of NaCl solution were set to evaluate the tolerance of Zhonglü 5, Zhonglü 26, and Zhonglü 27 at sprout stages. Seed germination rate, germination potential, germination index, relative salt damage rate for the three varieties were recorded and calculated at different time (24, 48, 72, and 96 h) under salt stress. The results showed that the germination of all varieties were significantly inhibited with the increase of NaCl concentration. The germination rate at 96 h for 0.9% NaCl was Zhonglü 27 > Zhonglü 26 > Zhonglü 5, while the germination petential and index of Zhonglü 26 were the highest and the both indexes of Zhonglü 5 were the lowest but without significant difference. The ralative salt damage rate of Zhonglü 27 (8.7%) was significantly lower than that of Zhonglü 26 (12.8%) and Zhonglü 5 (22.0%). Based on various indicators, it was found that the salt resistance at the germination stage was Zhonglü 27 > Zhonglü 26 > Zhonglü 5.

Key words: Mung bean, Variety, Salt tolerance, Germination rate, Germination potential

Fig.1

Change in germination rate of different mung bean varieties under different concentrations of NaCl stress Different lowercase letters indicate significant difference among treatments at the 0.05 level;“*”shows significant difference (P < 0.05);“**”shows extremely significant difference (P < 0.01), the same below."

Fig.2

Germination potential of mung beans under NaCl stress"

Fig.3

Germination indexes of mung beans under NaCl stress"

Fig.4

Relative salt damage rates of mung bean under NaCl stress"

Table 1

Seedling length of mung bean under NaCl stress"

品种
Variety		 NaCl浓度
NaCl
concentration (%)		 芽长Seedling length (cm)
48 h 72 h 96 h
中绿26
Zhonglü 26
 0.0 2.75±0.57a 7.59±1.10a 10.74±0.42a
0.3 1.69±0.31b 4.03±0.62b 7.43±0.64b
0.5 0.98±0.17bc 2.11±0.48c 3.65±0.63c
0.7 0.64±0.08c 1.20±0.11c 1.93±0.17d
0.9 0.39±0.07c 0.48±0.03c 0.65±0.13d
中绿27
Zhonglü 27
 0.0 2.49±0.48a 6.63±0.76a 8.46±0.87a
0.3 1.50±0.26b 3.48±0.69b 6.77±0.49b
0.5 0.87±0.17bc 1.93±0.35c 3.48±0.61b
0.7 0.72±0.05bc 1.23±0.12c 2.21±0.27bc
0.9 0.51±0.02c 0.68±0.03c 1.08±0.27c
中绿5号
Zhonglü 5
 0.0 2.43±0.55a 6.87±0.76a 9.36±0.45a
0.3 1.66±0.35ab 3.56±0.45b 6.93±0.56b
0.5 0.76±0.14bc 1.60±0.22c 3.40±0.68c
0.7 0.63±0.05c 1.02±0.15c 1.81±0.08d
0.9 0.40±0.09c 0.61±0.08c 1.01±0.13d

Fig.5

Germination under different concentration of NaCl for 96 h of mung bean cultivar"

[1] 侍瑞高, 蒋斌. 稻鸭共作模式下优质食味水稻产量及效益. 中国农技推广, 2022, 38(3):21-23.
[2] 罗德芳, 冯春晖, 吴家林, 等. 基于电磁感应协同野外原位光谱的土壤盐分反演研究. 中国土壤与肥料, 2020, 290(6):107-113.
[3] 秦雪峰, 高扬帆, 张育平, 等. 盐胁迫对玉米种子萌发和幼苗生长的影响. 安徽农业科学, 2006, 34(22):5782-5783.
[4] 田晓燕, 孔庆全, 贺小勇, 等. 绿豆晕疫病病原菌的分离和鉴定. 北方农业学报, 2021, 49(2):84-88.
doi: 10.12190/j.issn.2096-1197.2021.02.13
[5] 王珅, 范保杰, 王彦, 等. 高抗豆象绿豆新品种冀绿17号特征特性及高产栽培技术. 现代农村科技, 2022(10):18-19.
[6] 王婷. 2021年中国绿豆供需、种植情况及进出口状况分析:进口规模不断扩大. (2022-03-10) [2023-03-20]. https://www.chyxx.com/industry/202203/997442.html.
[7] 张秀玲. 盐胁迫对绿豆种子萌发的影响. 北方园艺, 2008(4):52-53.
[8] 殷丽丽, 陈晓亮, 陈璐璐, 等. NaCl、Na2SO4和Na2CO3对绿豆种子萌发的影响. 作物杂志, 2019(3):192-196.
[9] 刘顺平. 不同浓度NaCl处理对绿豆种子萌发的影响. 现代农业科技, 2016(20):12,15.
[10] 王乐政, 高凤菊, 华方静, 等. 不同绿豆品种萌发期耐盐性研究. 山东农业科学, 2015, 47(9):31-35.
[11] Manasa R, Rameshreddy K, Bindumadhava H, et al. Screening mungbean (Vigna radiata L.) lines for salinity tolerance using salinity induction response technique at seedling and physiological growth assay at whole plant level. International Journal of Plant,Animal and Environmental Sciences, 2017, 7(4):1-12.
[12] Alharby H F, Al-Zahrani H S, Hakeem K R, et al. Identification of physiological and biochemical markers for salt (NaCl) stress in the seedlings of mungbean [Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek] genotypes. Saudi Journal of Biological Sciences, 2019, 26(5):1053-1060.
doi: 10.1016/j.sjbs.2018.08.006 pmid: 31303840
[13] 张金涛, 王素华, 魏晶晶, 等. 高产高抗广适性绿豆品种中绿5号及其应用潜力. 中国种业, 2020(6):83-85.
[14] 王丽侠, 王素华, 潘晓威, 等. 早熟高产广适性绿豆新品种中绿27的选育. 中国种业, 2022(5):95-96.
[15] 陈宗金, 蔡士宾, 杨继书, 等. 主要农作物芽期耐盐性比较研究. 农业科学, 2012, 2(4):59-65.
[16] 周红菊. NaCl对作物种子发芽率的影响研究. 现代农村科技, 2011(16):69.
[17] 芦站根. 盐渍条件下三种豆类抗盐性的隶属函数值评价. 北方园艺, 2011(19):40-41.
[18] 徐小玉, 张凤银, 曾庆微. NaCl和Na2SO4盐胁迫对波斯菊种子萌发的影响. 东北农业大学学报, 2014, 45(4):55-59.
[19] 丁丁, 郭艳超, 左永梅, 等. 光照和NaCl胁迫对3种锦葵科植物种子萌发的影响. 江苏农业科学, 2018, 46(19):163-166.
[20] 张兆宁, 李江辉, 赵怡宇, 等. 不同程度盐胁迫下大豆萌发期耐盐性鉴定. 大豆科学, 2023, 42(3):335-343.
[21] 高春华, 朱金英, 张华文, 等. 38个粒用高粱品种芽期耐盐性的综合鉴定及评价. 核农学报, 2019, 33(9):1841-1855.
doi: 10.11869/j.issn.100-8551.2019.09.1841
[22] 孟庆俊, 冯启言, 周东来, 等. 盐碱对绿豆和油菜种子萌芽的胁迫效应. 安徽农业科学, 2008, 36(2):430,587.
[23] 刘文英, 刘建霞, 张永芳, 等. 盐胁迫对绿豆发芽率的影响. 农业与技术, 2014, 34(5):111-112,150.
[24] 袁典, 刘宏权, 韩会玲, 等. NaCl胁迫对绿豆种子萌发的影响. 种子, 2021, 40(4):90-95,100.
[25] 栾金华, 宋欣阳, 汪磊, 等. 辽宁省水稻新品系苗期耐盐性差异研究. 作物杂志, 2023(3):20-26.
[26] 张晓程. NaCl胁迫对四棱豆种子萌发及幼苗生长的影响. 农业研究与应用, 2014(5):7-10.
[27] 刘谢香, 常汝镇, 关荣霞, 等. 大豆出苗期耐盐性鉴定方法建立及耐盐种质筛选. 作物学报, 2020, 46(1):1-8.
[1] Liu Qianqian, Li Ran, Zhou Tingfang, Zhang Ze, Shangguan Xiaochuan, Pan Yue, Zhang Degui, Yong Hongjun, Li Mingshun, Han Jienan. Identification of Salt Tolerance of 211 Maize Inbred Lines at Germination Stage [J]. Crops, 2024, 40(4): 62-70.
[2] Liu Ying, Yin Zequn, Wu Baichen, Xu Mingli, Liu Chang, Shi Huishu, Pang Bo, Miao Xingfen. Effects of Compound Saline-Alkali Stress on Germination Period of Different Foxtail Millet Varieties and Screening of Saline-Alkali Tolerance Varieties [J]. Crops, 2024, 40(3): 207-215.
[3] Wang Shen, Fan Baojie, Liu Changyou, Wang Yan, Zhang Zhixiao, Su Qiuzhu, Shi Huiying, Shen Yingchao, Wang Xueqing, Tian Jing. Identification and Evaluation of Yield and Main Agronomic Characteristics of New Mung Bean Varieties [J]. Crops, 2024, 40(3): 90-99.
[4] Zhang Ruipu, Wang Na, Wang Kexin, Liu Jindong, Gao Xiaoli. Effects of Plant Growth Regulator S3307 on Physiological Metabolism of Mung Bean [J]. Crops, 2024, 40(2): 198-205.
[5] Zhang Zhixiao, Shen Yingchao, Fan Baojie, Wang Yan, Liu Changyou, Wang Shen, Cao Zhimin, Su Qiuzhu, Shi Huiying, Tian Jing. Germplasm Creation and New Variety Breeding for Fusarium Wilt Resistance in Mung Bean [J]. Crops, 2024, 40(2): 249-254.
[6] Duan Songjiang, Mulidier∙Baibolati, Peng Zengying, Shen Yingying, Wu Yifan, Fu Jincheng, Guo Rensong, Zhang Jusong. Screening of Nitrogen High-Efficiency Varieties and Comprehensive Evaluation of Nitrogen Efficiency of Sea Island Cotton [J]. Crops, 2024, 40(2): 62-70.
[7] Zhou Zhenlei, Liu Jianming, Cao Dong, Liu Baolong, Wang Dongxia, Zhang Huaigang. Comparison of Grass Yield, Agronomic Traits and Forage Quality of Different Oat Varieties [J]. Crops, 2024, 40(1): 132-140.
[8] Feng Yong, Hou Xuguang, Xue Chunlei, Zhang Laihou, Song Guodong, Su Minli, Fu Xiaohua, Sun Yuyan. Division of Suitable Ecological Regions of Maize Varieties in Inner Mongolia [J]. Crops, 2024, 40(1): 23-30.
[9] Wang Yueying, Fan Baojie, Cao Zhimin, Wang Yan, Su Qiuzhu, Zhang Zhixiao, Wang Shen, Shi Huiying, Shen Yingchao, Cheng Xuzhen, Liu Changyou, Tian Jing. Genetic Diversity Analysis of Landraces and Improved Varieties of Mung Bean by EST-SSR Markers [J]. Crops, 2024, 40(1): 73-79.
[10] Pei Chunling, Gu Yongzhe, Fu Jiaqi, Chao Shouwei, Lu Qian, Qiu Lijuan. Study on the Rapid Generation-Adding Technology of Huang-Huai-Hai Summer Soybean in Hainan [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(6): 35-40.
[11] Gao Zuoli, Jiang Shuaichen, Liu Yujia, Xu Zhihui, Liu Haifeng. Selection of Colored Rice Varieties Suitable for Planting in Yanbian Region [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(6): 62-68.
[12] Li Yuxin, Lu Min, Zhao Jiuran, Wang Ronghuan, Xu Tianjun, Lü Tianfang, Cai Wantao, Zhang Yong, Xue Honghe, Liu Yueʼe. The Production Status Investigation and Analysis of Summer Maize in Beijing-Tianjin-Tangshan Region [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(4): 174-181.
[13] Fu Xiaoyi, Wang Hongguang, Liu Zhilian, Li Dongxiao, He Mingqi, Li Ruiqi. Effects of Water Stress on Growth of Different Wheat Varieties at Seedling Stage and Selection of Drought Resistant Varieties [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(4): 224-229.
[14] Luan Jinhua, Song Xinyang, Wang Lei, Sun Lili, Cheng Yanshuang, Dong Hao, Zhang Jia, Cheng Xiaoyi, Xu Hai. Differences Research in Salt Tolerance of New Rice Lines at Seedling Stage in Liaoning [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(3): 20-26.
[15] Guo Hongxia, Wang Chuangyun, Deng Yan, Zhao Li, Zhang Liguang, Guo Hongxia, Qin Lixia, Gao Fei, Xi Ruizhen. Response of Quinoa to Low Nitrogen Stress [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(3): 221-229.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!