Crops ›› 2017, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (3): 96-103.doi: 10.16035/j.issn.1001-7283.2017.03.018

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Soil Nutrients Changes and Evaluation for Peach Cultivation under Greenhouse Conditions

Wang Jinyun1,Cheng Xianguo2,Guo Jibin1,Wang Li3   

  1. 1 College of Life Sciences,Shanxi Normal University,Linfen 041004,Shanxi,China
    2 Key Laboratory ofPlant Nutrition and Fertilizers,Agriculture of Ministry/Insititute of Agricultural Resources and Regional Planning,Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences,Beijing 100081,China
    3 Modern College of Arts and Science,Shanxi Normal University,Linfen 041000,Shanxi,China
  • Received:2016-12-28 Revised:2017-03-22 Online:2017-06-15 Published:2018-08-26
  • Contact: Li Wang

RichHTML

2

PDF (PC)

181

Abstract:

By studying the peach orchard soil nutrient trend over the planting years in Shanyin county of Shanxi Province, we found the reasonable fertilization and sustainable production of peach grown in greenhouse conditions. The results showed that the soil in Shanyin county was alkaline, and the soil pH gradually decreased with the increase of greenhouse planting years, but still suitable for the growth of peach tree. The contents of soil organic matter and available N, P, and K increased with increasing years of planting in which the 0-20cm soil depth layer were higher than the 20-60cm. Among which the soil organic matter was at medium to deficit level, available P and K were at an abundant level and the alkaline hydrolysis N was at the medium to deficit level. The use of organic fertilizer made the content of trace elements B, Zn, Cu, Fe increased with the increasing of planting years in peach facilities, but B, Zn contents were still at the deficit level in the soil. In conclusion, the organic fertilizer with high cellulose content should be added to improve the soil organic matter accumulation and the buffering capacity. To minimize the environmental negative effects, more focus should be put on a balanced fertilization such as reducing the rate of P and K fertilizer, increasing the ratio of N, P and K, and proper supplementation of trace elements in soil.

Key words: Facilities peach orchard, Planting years, Soil nutrient

Fig.1

Soil pH and electrical conductivity (EC) with the utilization ages of the peach greenhouses Note: Different letters mean significant difference at 0.05 level. Lowercase letters represent the utilization ages comparison; capital letters represent the soil layers comparison; CK represent the open field soils, the same below"

Fig.2

Changes of nutrient content in peach greenhouse of different utilization ages"

Table 1

Distribution frequency of standard of soil available nutrient in greenhouse %"

土层(cm)
Soil depth		 等级
Rank		 碱解氮Available N 速效磷Available P 速效钾Available K 有机质Organic matter
CK 设施Greenhouse CK 设施Greenhouse CK 设施Greenhouse CK 设施Greenhouse
0~20 丰 0.0 43.8 12.5 87.5 44.4 75.0 0.0 0.0
稍丰 0.0 43.8 50.0 12.5 22.2 25.0 0.0 6.3
中等 22.2 12.4 0.0 0.0 33.3 0.0 0.0 43.8
稍缺 33.3 0.0 12.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 55.6 43.8
缺 44.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 33.3 6.3
极缺 0.0 0.0 25.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 11.1 0.0
20~40 丰 0.0 0.0 0.0 33.0 33.3 37.5 0.0 0.0
稍丰 0.0 0.0 25.0 33.0 22.2 31.3 0.0 0.0
中等 0.0 0.25 12.5 14.0 44.4 25.0 0.0 0.0
稍缺 0.0 43.8 12.5 20.0 0.0 6.3 33.3 75.0
缺 100.0 32.2 12.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 66.7 18.8
极缺 0.0 0.0 37.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 6.3
40~60 丰 0.0 0.0 0.0 25.0 0.0 25.0 0.0 0.0
稍丰 0.0 0.0 25.0 18.8 33.3 25.0 0.0 0.0
中等 0.0 12.5 0.0 18.7 66.7 37.5 0.0 0.0
稍缺 11.1 37.5 0.0 25.0 0.0 12.5 22.2 37.5
缺 88.9 50.0 12.5 12.5 0.0 0.0 55.6 56.3
极缺 0.0 0.0 62.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 22.2 6.3

Fig.3

The amount of soil available B, Zn, Cu and Fe with the utilization ages of the peach greenhouses"

Table 2

Distribution frequency of soil available trace elements in greenhouse %"

土层(cm)
Soil depth		 等级
Rank		 有效硼Available B 有效锌Available Zn 有效铜Available Cu 有效铁Available Fe
CK 设施Greenhouse CK 设施Greenhouse CK 设施Greenhouse CK 设施Greenhouse
0~20 丰 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0
稍丰 0.0 12.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
中等 0.0 75.0 0.0 0.0 87.5 68.8 12.5 0.0
缺 100.0 12.5 0.0 0.0 12.5 31.3 50.0 0.0
极缺 0.0 0.0 100.0 100.0 0.0 0.0 37.5 0.0
20~40 丰 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0
稍丰 0.0 12.5 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
中等 0.0 37.5 0.0 0.0 100.0 56.3 12.5 0.0
缺 62.5 50.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 31.2 37.5 0.0
极缺 37.5 0.0 100.0 100.0 0.0 12.5 50.0 0.0
40~60 丰 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 100.0
稍丰 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
中等 0.0 56.2 0.0 0.0 62.5 43.8 37.5 0.0
缺 25.0 43.8 0 0.0 37.5 43.7 12.5 0.0
极缺 75.0 0.0 100.0 100.0 0.0 12.5 50.0 0.0
[1] 张良英, 王永熙, 王小伟 , 等. 草炭对桃园土壤理化性状及桃树生物效应的影响. 西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2008,36(3):145-149.
doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1671-9387.2008.03.027
[2] 何文寿 . 设施农业中存在的土壤障碍及其对策研究进展. 土壤, 2004,36(3):235-242.
doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0253-9829.2004.03.003
[3] 刘建霞, 马理, 李博文 , 等. 不同种植年限黄瓜温室土壤理化性质的变化规律. 水土保持学报, 2013,27(5):164-168.
[4] Manuel D B, Fernando T M, Antonio G , et al. Decoupling of soil nutrient cycles as a function of aridity in global drylands. Nature, 2013,502(7473):672-676.
doi: 10.1038/nature12670 pmid: 24172979
[5] Wang W, Sardans J ,Zeng C .Responses of soil nutrient concentrations and stoichiometry to diferent human land uses in a subtropical tidal wetland.Geoderma, 2014: 232-234, 459-470.
[6] Hu Y C, Song Z W, Lu W L , et al. Current soil nutrient status of intensively managed greenhouses. Pedosphere, 2012,22(6):825-833.
doi: 10.1016/S1002-0160(12)60068-X
[7] Burgess T M, Webster R . Optimal interpolation and isarithmic mapping of soil properties:1.The semi-variogram and punctual Kriging. Journal of Soil Science, 1980,31:315-341.
doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2389.1980.tb02084.x
[8] 秦莹, 娄翼来, 周丹 , 等. 沈阳市郊不同年限蔬菜温室土壤有效态微量元素分布特征. 土壤通报, 2009,40(3):648-652.
[9] 乔红波, 张慧, 高瑞 , 等. 三门峡烟区土壤pH时空变异特征. 中国烟草科学, 2010,1(4):48-51.
[10] 吕卫光, 余廷园, 诸海涛 , 等. 黄瓜连作对土壤理化性状及生物活性的影响研究.中国生态农业学报, 2006(2):119-121.
[11] Tarek G A, Ragheb T, Nizar A S , et al. Impact of intensive greenhouse production systems on soil quality. Pedosphere, 2015,25(2):283-293.
[12] 孙艳艳, 蒋桂英, 刘建国 , 等. 加工番茄连作对农田土壤酶活性及微生物区系的影响. 生态学报, 2010,30(13):3599-3607.
[13] 全国土壤普查办公室. 全国第二次土壤普查暂行技术规程.北京: 农业出版社, 1979.
[14] 熊汉琴, 王朝辉, 宰松梅 . 种植年限对蔬菜大棚土壤肥力的影响. 水土保持研究, 2007,14(3):137-139.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-3409.2007.03.043
[15] 李绍华 . 世界果树生产状况及提高我国果品市场竞争力对策. 中国农业大学学报, 2003,8(1):7-13.
doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1007-4333.2003.01.002
[16] 伊田, 梁东丽, 王松山 , 等. 不同种植年限对设施栽培土壤养分累积及其环境的影响. 西北农林科技大学学报(自然科学版), 2010,38(7):111-117.
[17] 范庆锋, 张玉龙, 陈重 . 保护地蔬菜栽培对土壤盐分积累及pH值的影响. 水土保持学报, 2009,23(1):103-106.
[18] 黄锦法, 李艾芬, 马树国 , 等. 浙江嘉兴保护地土壤障碍的农化性状指标研究. 土壤通报, 2001,32(4):160-162.
[19] 刘来, 孙锦, 郭世荣 , 等. 大棚辣椒连作土壤养分和离子变化与酸化的关系. 中国农学通报, 2013,29(16):100-105.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6850.2013.16.021
[20] 马艳春, 姚玉新, 杜远鹏 , 等. 葡萄设施栽培不同种植年限土壤理化性质的变化.果树学报, 2015(2):225-231.
[21] Coskan A, Atilgan A, Oz H , et al. Instantaneous evaluation of nitrate,ammonium,phosphorus and potassium pools in greenhouse soils in Antalya province of Turkey. African of Journal of Agricultural Research, 2012,7(6):937-942.
[22] 王吉彪, 王祎 . 基于GIS的凉州区日光温室土壤氮磷钾养分含量随种植年限变化分析.中国水土保持, 2016(3):64-66.
[23] 郭春霞, 沈根祥, 黄丽华 . 精确滴灌施肥技术对大棚土壤盐渍化和氮磷流失控制的研究. 农业环境科学学报, 2009,28(2):287-291.
[24] Poschenrieder C, Schmidhalter U, Hu Y C , et al. Current soil nutrient status of intensively managed greenhouses. Pedosphere, 2012,22(6):825-833.
doi: 10.1016/S1002-0160(12)60068-X
[25] Yang G R, Hao X Y, Li C L , et al. Effect of land use on soil phosphorus sorption-desorption under intensive agricultural practices in plastic-film greenhouses. Pedosphere, 2014,24(3):367-377.
doi: 10.1016/S1002-0160(14)60023-0
[26] 吴小宾 . 施肥枪施肥对桃树氮素吸收分配及其生长特性的研究. 泰安:山东农业大学, 2011.
doi: 10.7666/d.d143746
[27] 周鸣铮 . 土壤肥力概论.杭州: 浙江科学技术出版社, 1985: 118-154.
[28] 鲁如坤 . 土壤-植物营养学原理和施肥.北京: 化学工业出版社, 1998: 250-263.
[29] 刘铮 . 微量元素的农业化学.北京: 农业出版社, 1991: 130-269.
[30] 李志达, 朱其清 . 微量元素肥料. 南京: 江苏科学出版社, 1991: 200-430.
[1] Jingang Liang,Zhengguang Zhang. Advance on Effects of Genetically ModifiedCrops on Soil Ecosystems [J]. Crops, 2017, 33(4): 1-6.
[2] Wenchao Zhang,Yufeng Wang,Yifei Zhang,Jingyu Xu,Qiong Wu,Tianyu Chen,Pengfei Zhang,Chen Pang,Chunshuang Tang,Jian Fu,Kejun Yang. Effects of Different Tillage Methods on Changes of Soil Nutrients and Grain Yield of Maize in Semi-Arid Regions of Songnen Plain [J]. Crops, 2017, 33(4): 123-128.
[3] Youyu Jia,Yongfeng Ren,Yu Gao,Peiyi Zhao,Xiulan Yin,Bin Li,Meili Meng. Effects of Different Application of Soil Amendments in Yinshan Mountain Area of Inner Mongolia [J]. Crops, 2017, 33(2): 130-134.
[4] Runlian Wang,Zhidong Zhang,Jinghui Liu,Huijun Liu,Baoping Zhao. Effects of No-Tillage with Stubble Mulch on Soil Nutrients, Soil Enzyme Activities and Oat Yield [J]. Crops, 2016, 32(3): 134-138.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] Guangcai Zhao,Xuhong Chang,Demei Wang,Zhiqiang Tao,Yanjie Wang,Yushuang Yang,Yingjie Zhu. General Situation and Development of Wheat Production[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 1 -7 .
[2] Baoquan Quan,Dongmei Bai,Yuexia Tian,Yunyun Xue. Effects of Different Leaf-Peg Ratio on Photosynthesis and Yield of Peanut[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 102 -105 .
[3] Xuefang Huang,Mingjing Huang,Huatao Liu,Cong Zhao,Juanling Wang. Effects of Annual Precipitation and Population Density on Tiller-Earing and Yield of Zhangzagu 5 under Film Mulching and Hole Sowing[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 106 -113 .
[4] Wenhui Huang, Hui Wang, Desheng Mei. Research Progress on Lodging Resistance of Crops[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 13 -19 .
[5] Yun Zhao,Cailong Xu,Xu Yang,Suzhen Li,Jing Zhou,Jicun Li,Tianfu Han,Cunxiang Wu. Effects of Sowing Methods on Seedling Stand and Production Profit of Summer Soybean under Wheat-Soybean System[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 114 -120 .
[6] Mei Lu,Min Sun,Aixia Ren,Miaomiao Lei,Lingzhu Xue,Zhiqiang Gao. Effects of Spraying Foliar Fertilizers on Dryland Wheat Growth and the Correlation with Yield Formation[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 121 -125 .
[7] Xiaofei Wang,Haijun Xu,Mengqiao Guo,Yu Xiao,Xinyu Cheng,Shuxia Liu,Xiangjun Guan,Yaokun Wu,Weihua Zhao,Guojiang Wei. Effects of Sowing Date, Density and Fertilizer Utilization Rate on the Yield of Oilseed Perilla frutescens in Cold Area[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 126 -130 .
[8] Pengjin Zhu,Xinhua Pang,Chun Liang,Qinliang Tan,Lin Yan,Quanguang Zhou,Kewei Ou. Effects of Cold Stress on Reactive Oxygen Metabolism and Antioxidant Enzyme Activities of Sugarcane Seedlings[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 131 -137 .
[9] Jie Gao,Qingfeng Li,Qiu Peng,Xiaoyan Jiao,Jinsong Wang. Effects of Different Nutrient Combinations on Plant Production and Nitrogen, Phosphorus and Potassium Utilization Characteristics in Waxy Sorghum[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 138 -142 .
[10] Na Shang,Zhongxu Yang,Qiuzhi Li,Huihui Yin,Shihong Wang,Haitao Li,Tong Li,Han Zhang. Response of Cotton with Vegetative Branches to Plant Density in the Western of Shandong Province[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 143 -148 .