Crops ›› 2019, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (3): 132-136.doi: 10.16035/j.issn.1001-7283.2019.03.021

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Effects of Different Biological Organic Fertilizers on the Growth of Spring Potato and Soil Fertility at High Altitude Region in Guizhou Province

Zhang Meng,Gou Jiulan,Wei Quanquan,Chen Long,He Jiafang   

  1. Institute of Soil and Fertilizer, Guizhou Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Guiyang 550006, Guizhou, China
  • Received:2018-09-19 Revised:2018-12-14 Online:2019-06-15 Published:2019-06-12
  • Contact: Jiafang He

RichHTML

8

PDF (PC)

208

Abstract:

Weiyu No.5 (spring potato variety in Guizhou) was used in an field experiment to study the effects of different biological organic fertilizers on potato yield, characteristics such as nutrient and quality as well as soil fertility. The results showed that the application of biological organic fertilizer could significantly increase the emergence rate of potato, and the yield increased by 2.11%-26.46%; the number of potatoes per plant increased by 5.45%-38.18%; the yield per plant increased by 1.41%-47.16% compared with the conventional fertilization. T2 treatment in which the RW was added as an organic decomposition enhancer was the best. The content of phosphorus in potato tubers was increased by 19.55%-42.46% significantly, and the content of starch was increased by 2.44-8.69 percentage points, but no significant change in contents of nitrogen, water content and reducing sugar. The application of biological organic fertilizer significantly increased the contents of soil organic matter, total nitrogen, alkali-hydrolysis nitrogen, available phosphorus and available potassium by 49.31%-91.35% (except Jinkuizi LPK biological fertilizer), 38.21%-52.36%, 10.42%-21.74%, 10.92%-68.41% and 10.53%-39.47% compared with T1 treatment, respectively. In general, RW can be used as the best biological organic fertilizer for high yield and high quality cultivation of spring potato in the high altitude area of Guizhou.

Key words: Biological organic fertilizer, Potato, Yield, Nutrition and quality, Soil fertility

Table 1

Types and application rates of different fertilizers under different treatments kg/hm2"

处理
Treatment		 基肥Base fertilizer 追肥(尿素)
Dressing fertilizer
(urea)
西洋复合肥
Compound fertilizer		 有机肥
Organic fertilizer
T1 750 - 112.5
T2 750 1 800 112.5
T3 750 1 800 112.5
T4 750 1 800 112.5
T5 750 1 800 112.5
T6 750 1 800 112.5

Table 2

Effects of different treatments on the seedling emergence rate of potato %"

处理
Treatment		 出苗率Seedling emergence rate
Ⅰ Ⅱ Ⅲ 平均值Average
T1 90.00 91.25 88.75 90.00b
T2 95.00 100.00 98.75 97.92a
T3 92.50 92.50 95.00 93.33ab
T4 85.00 97.50 92.50 91.67ab
T5 88.75 93.75 100.00 94.17ab
T6 93.75 86.25 93.75 91.25ab

Table 3

Effects of different treatments on the yield of potato"

处理
Treatment		 小区产量Pot yield (kg/13.5m2) 单产(kg/hm2)
Yield		 增产率(%)
Yield increasing rate
Ⅰ Ⅱ Ⅲ 平均值Average
T1 26.40 24.50 24.83 25.24c 18 699c -
T2 32.78 31.13 31.88 31.93a 23 652a 26.46
T3 27.90 29.45 27.35 28.23b 20 914b 11.84
T4 26.20 26.88 24.25 25.78c 19 094c 2.11
T5 29.50 33.00 30.63 31.04a 22 995a 22.97
T6 25.25 28.30 27.63 27.06bc 20 044bc 7.20

Table 4

Effects of different treatments on the characteristics of potato tuber"

处理
Treatment		 单株结薯数Tuber number per plant 单株产量Tuber yield per plant (g) 大中薯率(%)
Large- and medium-sized tuber percentage
总Total 大Large 中Medium 小Small 总Total 大Large 中Medium 小Small
T1 5.5b 1.1c 2.8a 1.6b 423.52c 145.36c 202.00c 76.16a 82.02b
T2 7.6a 2.4a 3.6a 1.6b 623.24a 270.04a 290.68a 62.52b 89.97a
T3 6.4ab 1.6b 2.8a 2.0a 511.64b 203.84b 245.28b 62.52b 87.78a
T4 5.8b 1.2c 3.6a 1.0c 429.49c 121.21d 264.36ab 43.92c 89.77a
T5 7.4a 2.4a 3.2a 1.8ab 610.72a 261.96a 271.04ab 77.72a 87.27a
T6 6.5ab 1.7b 3.2a 1.6b 491.40b 197.80b 238.00b 55.60bc 88.69a

Table 5

Effects of different treatments on nutrients and qualities of potato"

处理Treatment 氮Nitrogen (g/kg) 磷Phosphorus (g/kg) 钾Potassium (g/kg) 水分Water (%) 淀粉Starch (%) 还原糖Reducing sugar (%)
T1 19.24a 1.79b 12.45b 82.89a 7.83c 0.31a
T2 19.35a 2.22a 12.95b 82.75a 16.52a 0.31a
T3 20.58a 2.31a 12.80b 84.32a 10.49b 0.30a
T4 19.47a 2.14a 13.55b 82.69a 10.27b 0.29a
T5 20.02a 2.30a 13.30b 82.18a 13.10ab 0.28a
T6 21.14a 2.55a 18.65a 86.27a 14.40ab 0.29a

Table 6

Effects of different treatments on nutrient content of topsoil (0~20cm)"

处理
Treatment		 pH 有机质(g/kg)
Organic matter		 全氮(g/kg)
Total nitrogen		 碱解氮(mg/kg)
Alkali nitrogen		 全磷(g/kg)
Total phosphorus		 有效磷(mg/kg)
Available phosphorus		 全钾(g/kg)
Total potassium		 速效钾(mg/kg)
Available potassium
T1 5.31a 36.89c 2.12b 116.16c 1.25a 52.65c 12.24a 57.0b
T2 5.43a 70.59a 3.23a 141.41a 1.40a 58.40bc 12.28a 70.0ab
T3 5.35a 58.70b 2.93a 140.24a 1.39a 73.00b 12.58a 71.0ab
T4 5.43a 34.06c 2.96a 128.26b 1.29a 61.00bc 12.34a 63.0b
T5 5.40a 64.50ab 3.13a 135.31ab 1.30a 88.70a 13.25a 72.0ab
T6 5.47a 55.08b 3.08a 133.29ab 1.45a 60.30bc 12.80a 79.5a
[1] 孙会忠, 高聚林, 刘克礼 , 等. 马铃薯源器官建成规律研究. 中国马铃薯, 2003,17(5):262-266.
[2] 李国琴, 李秉雄, 王顺江 . 农家肥、氮肥、磷肥配施对马铃薯产量的影响. 中国马铃薯, 2005,19(5):262-265.
[3] 江华波, 铁曼曼, 邱亨池 , 等. 生物有机肥的特性及应用. 现代农业科技, 2015,23(11):242-243.
[4] 施河丽, 谭军, 秦兴成 , 等. 不同生物有机肥对烤烟生长发育及产质量的影响. 中国烟草科学, 2014,35(2):65-68.
[5] 王建湘, 周杰良 . 不同有机肥种类对小白菜品质及产量的影响. 上海蔬菜, 2007,23(1):63-64.
[6] 蒋春来, 李淑芹, 王东 , 等. 生物有机肥对春小麦品质产量的影响. 东北农业大学学报, 2004,35(5):526-528.
[7] 李巨, 李长喜 . 生物有机肥对花生生长发育及产量的影响. 花生学报, 2014,43(3):52-55.
[8] 胡诚, 刘东海, 乔艳 , 等. 施用生物有机肥对土壤酶活性及作物产量的影响. 华北农学报, 2017,32(增刊):308-312.
[9] 张丽荣, 郭成瑾, 沈瑞清 , 等. 不同生物有机肥对马铃薯生长和产量的影响以及防治黑痣病的效果. 江苏农业科学, 2017,45(14):66-68.
[10] 刘星, 张文明, 张春红 , 等. 土壤灭菌-生物有机肥联用对连作马铃薯及土壤真菌群落结构的影响. 生态学报, 2016,36(20):6365-6378.
[11] 孙家骏, 付青霞, 谷洁 , 等. 生物有机肥对猕猴桃土壤酶活性和微生物群落的影响. 2016,27(3):829-837.
[12] 孔涛, 马瑜, 刘民 , 等. 生物有机肥对土壤养分和土壤微生物的影响. 干旱区研究, 2016,33(4):884-891.
[13] 巩子毓, 高旭, 黄炎 , 等. 连续施用生物有机肥提高设施黄瓜产量和品质的研究. 南京农业大学学报, 2016,39(5):777-783.
[14] 李春花, 孙道旺, 何成兴 , 等. 不同生物有机肥对荞麦病害及产量的影响. 中国农学通报, 2018,34(19):1-4.
[15] 柳玲玲, 芶久兰, 何佳芳 , 等. 生物有机肥对连作马铃薯及土壤生化性状的影响. 土壤, 2017,49(4):706-711.
[16] 鲍士旦 . 土壤农化分析. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2000.
[17] 高俊风 . 植物生理学实验指导. 北京: 高等教育出版社, 2006.
[18] 王文丽, 李娟, 赵旭 . 3种生物有机肥对马铃薯生长发育和品质的影响. 甘肃农业科技, 2014,16(9):10-12.
[19] 李鸣凤, 王清林, 鲁明星 , 等. 有机水溶肥料与无机肥料配施对马铃薯产量、养分吸收和品质的影响. 中国马铃薯, 28(6):340-347.
[20] 曾晶, 荣湘民, 刘强 , 等. 酒糟型生物有机肥对豆角产量和品质的影响. 湖南农业科学, 2007,41(3):106-109.
[21] 郭赵娟, 吴焕章, 刘慧超 , 等. 马铃薯栽培有机肥料筛选试验. 中国马铃薯, 2005,19(4):218-220.
[22] 李鸣雷, 谷洁, 高华 , 等. 不同有机肥对大豆植株性状、品质和产量的影响. 西北农林科技大学学报, 2007,35(9):66-72.
[23] 赵跃, 黄楠, 刘继培 , 等. 生物有机肥替代化肥对番茄产量和品质及土壤养分的影响. 中国农技推广, 2019,35(2):57-59.
[24] 吴平江, 夏叶, 薛勇 , 等. 不同生物有机肥对绿洲温室番茄生长及产量的影响. 安徽农业科学, 2019,47(2):144-146.
[1] Quan Baoquan,Lü Ruizhou,Wang Guijiang,Ren Jiecheng. Effects of Different Cultivation Measures during Vegetative Propagation on Growth and Yield of Sweet Potato [J]. Crops, 2019, 35(3): 158-161.
[2] Wang Yonggang,Ji Mingze,Zhao Xuhan,Yu Lihe,Xue Yingwen. Effects of Sowing Dates on Yield of Baiyan 7 in Midwest of Heilongjiang Province [J]. Crops, 2019, 35(3): 106-111.
[3] Song Lifang,Feng Meichen,Zhang Meijun,Xiao Lujie,Wang Chao,Yang Wude,Song Xiaoyan. Effects of Exogenous Selenium on the Growth and Development of Tartary Buckwheat and Selenium Content in Grains [J]. Crops, 2019, 35(3): 150-154.
[4] Gao Tongmei,Li Feng,Wu Yin,Wei Libin,Wang Dongyong,Tian Yuan,Fei Gaoliang,Wei Shuangling. Effects of Different Irrigation Regimes on Canopy Structure and Population Quality of Sesame [J]. Crops, 2019, 35(3): 162-167.
[5] Zhang Yahong,Wang Furong,Lei Jianming,Wu Junyan,Fan Tiping,Zhang Jianxue. Effects of Sowing Date on the Yield and Quality of Perilla frutescens L.in the Dryland Hills Area [J]. Crops, 2019, 35(3): 168-171.
[6] Feng Xuejin,Guo Xiujuan,Yang Jianchun,Wang Liqin. Effects of Spraying Selenium Fertilizer on Selenium Content, Yield and Quality of Flax Seed [J]. Crops, 2019, 35(3): 155-157.
[7] Ye Weijun,Yang Yong,Zhang Liya,Tian Dongfeng,Zhang Lingling,Zhou Bin. Effects of Nitrogen on Agronomic Traits and Nitrogen Use Efficiency of Mung Bean Cultivar Wankelü 3 [J]. Crops, 2019, 35(3): 137-141.
[8] Tan Qinliang,Zhu Pengjin,Cheng Qin,Li Jiahui,Lü Ping,Pang Xinhua,Zhou Quanguang. Comparison Study on the Yield Components and Quality of Different Sugarcane Varieties (Lines) [J]. Crops, 2019, 35(3): 49-54.
[9] Ren Honglei,Li Chunxia,Gong Shichen,Li Guoliang,Hu Guanghui,Wang Mingquan,Yang Jianfei. Genetic Correlation and Path Analysis of Yield and Agronomic Characteristics of Maize Hybrids in SPSS Software [J]. Crops, 2019, 35(3): 86-90.
[10] Cao Liang,Huang Binglin,Wang Mengxue,Zhang Yuxian. Effects of Row Spacing and Number of Seedling Per Hole on Yield and Quality of Rice in Cold Regions [J]. Crops, 2019, 35(3): 91-98.
[11] Dongmei Zhang,Xuefang Huang,Chunxia Jiang,Wei Zhang,Xiaojuan Wang,Huatao Liu,Liuying Yan,Enke Liu,Guangqian Zhai. Effects of Micro-Ridge Film Mulching on Soil Water and Temperature and Yield of Dryland Maize in Cold Areas [J]. Crops, 2019, 35(2): 115-121.
[12] Yufei Zhang,Lizhi Liu,Yuxuan Ma,Xiaochun Wang,Jianjun Dai. Effects of Tillage and Straw Returning Methods on Maize Yield and Potassium Accumulation and Transport [J]. Crops, 2019, 35(2): 122-127.
[13] Yajun Liu,Fengli Chu,Wenjing Wang,Qiguo Hu,Aimei Yang. Effects of Different Supporting Cultivation Measures on the Yield and Weeds Control of Sweet Potato cv. Shangshu 9 [J]. Crops, 2019, 35(2): 179-184.
[14] Lifeng Dong,Xiaohu Lin,Chunrong Liu,Guishuang Hou,Chunlu Zhang,Jinfeng Fu,Fengbao Wang. Effects of Compound Seed Coating Agents on Pea Growth and Yield [J]. Crops, 2019, 35(2): 185-191.
[15] Yunqing Gao,Shutong Li,Qibing Shang,Junchun Shi,Dongxu Xu. Nodules and Yield of Faba Bean under Different Fertilizer Treatments [J]. Crops, 2019, 35(2): 164-167.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] Yudong Fang,Tianfu Han. Research Progress in Speed Breeding of Crops[J]. Crops, 2019, 35(2): 1 -7 .
[2] . [J]. Crops, 1998, 14(6): 14 -15 .
[3] Fang Chen,Shixiao Xu,Xiaohui Li,Chao Liu,Jianfei Zhou,Yuan Wang,Pei Tian,Tiezhao Yang. Construction of Molecular Fingerprinting and Analysis of Genetic Diversity for 80 Tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum) Germplasms Based on SSR Markers[J]. Crops, 2019, 35(1): 22 -31 .
[4] Fu Jing,Sun Ningning,Liu Tianxue,Ma Junfeng,Yang Yulong,Zhao Xia,Mu Xinyuan,Li Chaohai. The Effects of High Temperature at Spike Stage on Grain-Filling Physiology and Yield of Maize[J]. Crops, 2019, 35(3): 118 -125 .
[5] Quan Baoquan,Lü Ruizhou,Wang Guijiang,Ren Jiecheng. Effects of Different Cultivation Measures during Vegetative Propagation on Growth and Yield of Sweet Potato[J]. Crops, 2019, 35(3): 158 -161 .
[6] Lu Shouping,Zhang Hua,Meng Zhaodong,Mu Chunhua. Improvement of Grain Oil Content in Maize Inbred Lines by Molecular Markering Technology[J]. Crops, 2019, 35(3): 24 -28 .
[7] Zhang Ziqiang,Wang Liang,Bai Chen,Zhang Huizhong,Li Xiaodong,Fu Zengjuan,Zhao Shangmin,E Yuanyuan,Zhang Hui,Zhang Bizhou. Analysis on Main Agronomic Traits of 104 Sugarbeet Germplasm Resources[J]. Crops, 2019, 35(3): 29 -36 .
[8] Ma Mingchuan,Liu Longlong,Zhang Lijun,Cui Lin,Zhou Jianping. Morphological Identification and Analysis of EMS-Induced Mutants from Ciqiao[J]. Crops, 2019, 35(3): 37 -41 .
[9] Fan Huiling,Bai Shengwen,Zhu Xuefeng,Li Zhenzhou,Qin Minggang,He Zhijun. Difference of Salt-Alkaline Tolerance of Three Rape and Its Two Relatives at Germination Stage[J]. Crops, 2019, 35(3): 178 -184 .
[10] Ye Wenbin,He Yupeng,Wang Yu,Wang Han,Zhao Qingfang. Effects of Alkalized Olive Oil Processing Liquid Wastes on Seed Germination and Seedling Growth of Zea mays L.[J]. Crops, 2019, 35(3): 185 -191 .