Crops ›› 2019, Vol. 35 ›› Issue (2): 164-167.doi: 10.16035/j.issn.1001-7283.2019.02.025

;

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Nodules and Yield of Faba Bean under Different Fertilizer Treatments

Yunqing Gao1,Shutong Li1,Qibing Shang1,Junchun Shi2,Dongxu Xu1   

  1. 1 Zhangjiakou Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Zhangjiakou 075000, Hebei, China
    2 Yangyuan County Agriculture and Animal Husbandry Bureau, Yangyuan 075800, Hebei, China
  • Received:2018-12-07 Revised:2018-12-29 Online:2019-04-15 Published:2019-04-12
  • Contact: Dongxu Xu

RichHTML

5

PDF (PC)

148

Abstract:

The effects on the nodules and yield of faba bean under different fertilizer treatments was studied in the main faba bean production area, the northwest of Hebei Province. The results showed that P-K fertilizer could promote the formation of nodule. During the flowering period, the number of nodule and dry weight were increased at first and then decreased with the increase of N fertilizer application levels. The number of nodule (56.0 number/plant) and dry weight (0.121g/plant) of N60 were the highest, increased by 46.6% and 49.4%, respectively over the control. At maturity, the number of nodule and dry weight were decreased gradually with the increase of N fertilizer, which inhibited the formation of nodule. Both the application of P-K fertilizer and N-P-K fertilizer the dry matter accumulation were higher than the control treatment. An appropriate amount of N fertilizer combined with P-K fertilizer can promote the growth of roots, stems, leaves, and grains. Excessive N fertilizer could inhibit the growth of plants. Under the test conditions, N 60kg/hm 2, P2O5 60kg/hm 2 and K2O 75kg/hm 2 were the best combination, and obtained the highest yield of faba bean.

Key words: Faba bean, Fertilizer, Nodule, Yield

Table 1

The design scheme of the test kg/hm2"

处理Treatment CK N0 N30 N60 N90 N120 N150
施N量N application level 0 0 30 60 90 120 150
施P2O5量P2O5application level 0 60 60 60 60 60 60
施K2O量K2O application level 0 75 75 75 75 75 75

Table 2

The number and dry weight of the nodule in flowering and mature period"

处理
Treatment		 单株根瘤个数Nodules per plant 单株根瘤干重Nodules dry weight per plant (g)
盛花期Flowering period 成熟期Maturity period 盛花期Flowering period 成熟期Maturity period
CK 38.2c 53.8a 0.081b 0.187a
N0 54.5ab 42.5b 0.115a 0.195a
N30 54.6ab 40.5b 0.120a 0.173a
N60 56.0a 25.5c 0.121a 0.115b
N90 39.8bc 24.3c 0.086b 0.124b
N120 36.0c 21.7c 0.078b 0.118b
N150 31.5c 20.0c 0.071b 0.101b

Table 3

The dry weight of different parts in flowering and mature period g/株 g/plant"

处理
Treatment		 盛花期Flowering period 成熟期Maturity period
根Root 茎Stem 叶Leaf 根Root 茎Stem 叶Leaf 子粒Seed
CK 0.456b 1.468b 1.970b 1.273ab 5.162c 0.510b 6.722b
N0 0.603a 1.978a 2.570a 1.722a 6.930ab 0.792ab 8.522a
N30 0.623a 2.071a 2.708a 1.528ab 6.953ab 0.668ab 9.183a
N60 0.610a 2.088a 2.633a 1.565ab 7.988a 1.020a 9.546a
N90 0.599a 1.907a 2.363a 1.217ab 6.014bc 0.834ab 8.937a
N120 0.598a 1.953a 2.344a 1.140b 5.628c 0.855ab 6.798b
N150 0.612a 2.037a 2.623a 1.337ab 5.446c 0.651ab 7.042b

Table 4

The N accumulation of different treatments in flowering and mature period g/株 g/plant"

处理
Treatment		 盛花期Flowering period 成熟期Maturity period
根Root 茎Stem 叶Leaf 合计Total 根Root 茎Stem 叶Leaf 子粒Seed 合计Total
CK 0.011 0.031 0.095 0.137 0.032 0.093 0.019 0.312 0.456
N0 0.012 0.040 0.130 0.182 0.039 0.114 0.029 0.388 0.570
N30 0.014 0.041 0.144 0.199 0.036 0.113 0.028 0.433 0.610
N60 0.012 0.043 0.127 0.182 0.036 0.125 0.039 0.466 0.666
N90 0.014 0.042 0.113 0.169 0.026 0.101 0.014 0.424 0.565
N120 0.014 0.044 0.106 0.164 0.028 0.114 0.034 0.310 0.486
N150 0.013 0.039 0.134 0.186 0.033 0.076 0.024 0.318 0.451

Table 5

The economic traits and yield of different treatments in mature period"

处理
Treatment		 株高(cm)
Plant
height		 主茎分枝
Branches of
main stem		 主茎节数
Nodes
of main stem		 荚长(cm)
Pod length		 单荚粒数
Seeds per
pod		 单株荚数
Pods per
plant		 百粒重(g)
100-seed
weight		 小区产量(g)
Yield of plot		 产量
(kg/hm2)
Yield		 增幅(%)
Increasing
rate
CK 47.9c 1.6a 18.2bc 6.4a 2.3ab 4.3a 104.7a 2 380b 1 190.6 -
N0 54.8ab 1.7a 18.9ab 6.7a 2.3ab 4.8a 105.7a 2 537b 1 269.0 6.6
N30 55.8a 1.7a 18.3bc 6.7a 2.5a 5.0a 106.5a 3 160a 1 580.8 32.8
N60 55.2ab 1.8a 19.0ab 7.1a 2.5a 5.3a 106.3a 3 430a 1 715.9 44.1
N90 51.6abc 1.7a 19.6a 6.3a 2.3ab 5.0a 104.6a 3 203a 1 602.5 34.6
N120 50.0bc 1.6a 17.9c 6.1a 1.8b 4.4a 104.5a 2 703b 1 352.2 13.6
N150 50.8abc 1.6a 19.2a 6.5a 1.8b 4.0a 104.8a 2 441b 1 220.5 2.5
[1] 夏玄 . 氮素水平对大豆结瘤、氮素积累及产量的影响. 哈尔滨:东北农业大学, 2014.
[2] 严君, 韩晓增, 王影 , 等. 大豆固氮能力和产量对施氮量的响应. 大豆科学, 2013,32(6):778-785.
[3] 张立军, 陈艳秋, 宋书宏 . 豆科作物调控共生固氮响应干旱胁迫机制研究进展. 大豆科学, 2013,32(5):694-697.
doi: 10.11861/j.issn.1000-9841.2013.05.0694
[4] 严君, 韩晓增, 丁娇 , 等. 东北黑土区大豆生长、结瘤及产量对氮、磷的响应. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2014,20(2):318-325.
doi: 10.11674/zwyf.2014.0207
[5] 邱才飞, 彭春瑞, 陈金 , 等. 施氮水平对“赣花7号”氮素代谢、根瘤生长及产量的影响. 中国农学通报, 2014,30(12):218-222.
doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.2013-2254
[6] 孙虎, 王月福, 马东辉 , 等. 施氮量对不同类型花生生长发育及产量的影响. 安徽农学通报, 2007,13(3):76-77.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1007-7731.2007.03.036
[7] 郑永美, 王春晓, 刘岐茂 , 等. 氮肥对花生根系生长和结瘤能力的调控效应. 核农学报, 2017,31(12):2418-2425.
doi: 10.11869/j.issn.100-8551.2017.12.2418
[8] 王月福, 徐亮, 赵长星 , 等. 施磷对花生积累氮素来源和产量的影响. 土壤通报, 2012,43(2):444-450.
[9] 叶芳, 刘晓静, 张进霞 . 氮素形态对紫花苜蓿盛花期生长及结瘤固氮的影响. 草原与草坪, 2014,34(2):1-6.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-5500.2014.02.001
[10] 陆太伟, 石雅飞, 李进文 , 等. 磷肥对紫花苜蓿及其根瘤生长的影响研究. 农业与技术, 2013,33(11):3-4.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-962X.2013.11.004
[11] 范富, 张庆国, 张永亮 , 等. 施肥对紫花苜蓿根瘤的影响. 农业网络信息, 2017(7):96-98.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-6251.2006.07.035
[12] 刘旭艳, 石凤翎, 张璐 , 等. 不同苜蓿材料分枝期生长与结瘤的初步研究. 中国草地学报, 2015,37(3):116-120.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-5021.2015.03.020
[13] 王静, 段红平, 包世英 , 等. 不同施肥处理对蚕豆根系及根瘤的影响. 云南农业大学学报, 2007,22(4):555-559.
doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1004-390X.2007.04.019
[14] 宗绪晓, 包世英, 关建平 , 等. 蚕豆种质资源描述规范和数据标准. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2006.
[1] Yonggang Wang,Mingze Ji,Xuhan Zhao,Lihe Yu,Yingwen Xue. Effects of Sowing Dates on Yield of Baiyan 7 in Midwest of Heilongjiang Province [J]. Crops, 2019, 190(3): 106-111.
[2] Dongmei Zhang,Xuefang Huang,Chunxia Jiang,Wei Zhang,Xiaojuan Wang,Huatao Liu,Liuying Yan,Enke Liu,Guangqian Zhai. Effects of Micro-Ridge Film Mulching on Soil Water and Temperature and Yield of Dryland Maize in Cold Areas [J]. Crops, 2019, 35(2): 115-121.
[3] Yufei Zhang,Lizhi Liu,Yuxuan Ma,Xiaochun Wang,Jianjun Dai. Effects of Tillage and Straw Returning Methods on Maize Yield and Potassium Accumulation and Transport [J]. Crops, 2019, 35(2): 122-127.
[4] Yajun Liu,Fengli Chu,Wenjing Wang,Qiguo Hu,Aimei Yang. Effects of Different Supporting Cultivation Measures on the Yield and Weeds Control of Sweet Potato cv. Shangshu 9 [J]. Crops, 2019, 35(2): 179-184.
[5] Lifeng Dong,Xiaohu Lin,Chunrong Liu,Guishuang Hou,Chunlu Zhang,Jinfeng Fu,Fengbao Wang. Effects of Compound Seed Coating Agents on Pea Growth and Yield [J]. Crops, 2019, 35(2): 185-191.
[6] Huihui Tang,Yanli Xu,Qingyan Wang,Zhengbo Ma,Guangyan Li,Hui Dong,Zhiqiang Dong. Effects of Foliar Spraying 5-Aminolevulinic Acid on Spring Maize Growth and Yield under Different Planting Densities [J]. Crops, 2019, 35(2): 136-141.
[7] Deming Xiang,Mingfa Zhang,Shuguang Peng,Feng Tian,Jianxin Luo,Wu Chen,Yunfan Cai,Minghui Tian,Qisong Lü. Effects of Consecutive Applying Different New Type Fertilizers on Soil Fungal Communities and Tobacco Quality and Yield [J]. Crops, 2019, 35(2): 156-163.
[8] Xiaojun Xiao,Weisheng Lü,Paolan Yu,Wei Zheng,Yazhen Li,Lei Hu,Fuliang Xiao,Shaowen Zhang,Tianbao Huang,Guobin Xiao. Effects of Nitrogen Application Rate on Yield Formation and Nitrogen Use Efficiency of Early Rice under Rape Straw Returning in Triple Cropping [J]. Crops, 2019, 35(2): 103-109.
[9] Xingqi Ou,Xiujuan Ren,Xinhua Li,Yangjuan Ou. Effects of Side-Row Marginal Advantage and Inner-Row Performance on Plot Yield and Yield Components of Wheat [J]. Crops, 2019, 35(1): 97-102.
[10] Kainan Zhao,Xuhong Chang,Demei Wang,Zhiqiang Tao,Yushuang Yang,Ruiqi Ma,Yingjie Zhu,Zheli Xu,Baojun Zhang,Guangcai Zhao. Effects of Tridimensional Uniform Sowing and Fertilizer on Grain and Physiological Characteristics of Winter Wheat [J]. Crops, 2019, 35(1): 103-110.
[11] Qian Liang,Wenya Liu,Junzhu Ge,Ming Zhao,Haipeng Hou,Yong′an Yang,Decai Xin. Regulation Effects of Narrow-Double Row Precision Sowing with Subsoiling on Yield in Summer Maize [J]. Crops, 2019, 35(1): 111-115.
[12] Yang Zhang,Huilin Yu,Yanbo Wang. Study on Yield and Related Traits of Maize Varieties in Different Ecological Regions of Eastern North China [J]. Crops, 2019, 35(1): 38-43.
[13] Haibing Wu,Daohong Liu,Ming Zhong,Youyuan Wang. Effects of Water Management and Potash Application on Grain Yield and Lodging Resistance of Rice [J]. Crops, 2019, 35(1): 127-133.
[14] Jinghong Tan,Luping Zhang,Qixia Wu,Jianqiang Zhu,Zaizhen Zhang. Comparative Research on the Effects of Reducing Nitrogen from Different Fertilizers on Cotton [J]. Crops, 2019, 35(1): 134-140.
[15] Xiaoming Wang,Dacheng Li,Zhengda Liao,Yuanchu Gan,Huixiu Chen,Xide Su,Zenglin Wei. Comparation of Agronomic Traits and Yield among Sugarcane Varieties [J]. Crops, 2019, 35(1): 50-55.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
[1] Guangcai Zhao,Xuhong Chang,Demei Wang,Zhiqiang Tao,Yanjie Wang,Yushuang Yang,Yingjie Zhu. General Situation and Development of Wheat Production[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 1 -7 .
[2] Baoquan Quan,Dongmei Bai,Yuexia Tian,Yunyun Xue. Effects of Different Leaf-Peg Ratio on Photosynthesis and Yield of Peanut[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 102 -105 .
[3] Xuefang Huang,Mingjing Huang,Huatao Liu,Cong Zhao,Juanling Wang. Effects of Annual Precipitation and Population Density on Tiller-Earing and Yield of Zhangzagu 5 under Film Mulching and Hole Sowing[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 106 -113 .
[4] Ruiqi Ma,Zhen Qi,Xuhong Chang,Demei Wang,Zhiqiang Tao,Yushuang Yang,Jinfeng Feng,Min Sun,Guangcai Zhao. Regulation Effects of Growth Regulators on Plant Characters, Yield and Quality of Winter Wheat[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(1): 133 -140 .
[5] Wenhui Huang, Hui Wang, Desheng Mei. Research Progress on Lodging Resistance of Crops[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 13 -19 .
[6] Hongyan Li,Yonghong Wang,Rulang Zhao,Wenjie Zhang,Bo Ming,Ruizhi Xie,Keru Wang,Lulu Li,Shang Gao,Shaokun Li. The Construction and Application of Maize Grain Dehydration Model in Yellow River Irrigation and Pumping Irrigation District in Ningxia[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 149 -153 .
[7] Yun Zhao,Cailong Xu,Xu Yang,Suzhen Li,Jing Zhou,Jicun Li,Tianfu Han,Cunxiang Wu. Effects of Sowing Methods on Seedling Stand and Production Profit of Summer Soybean under Wheat-Soybean System[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 114 -120 .
[8] Mei Lu,Min Sun,Aixia Ren,Miaomiao Lei,Lingzhu Xue,Zhiqiang Gao. Effects of Spraying Foliar Fertilizers on Dryland Wheat Growth and the Correlation with Yield Formation[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 121 -125 .
[9] Xiaofei Wang,Haijun Xu,Mengqiao Guo,Yu Xiao,Xinyu Cheng,Shuxia Liu,Xiangjun Guan,Yaokun Wu,Weihua Zhao,Guojiang Wei. Effects of Sowing Date, Density and Fertilizer Utilization Rate on the Yield of Oilseed Perilla frutescens in Cold Area[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 126 -130 .
[10] Pengjin Zhu,Xinhua Pang,Chun Liang,Qinliang Tan,Lin Yan,Quanguang Zhou,Kewei Ou. Effects of Cold Stress on Reactive Oxygen Metabolism and Antioxidant Enzyme Activities of Sugarcane Seedlings[J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 131 -137 .