Crops ›› 2021, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (2): 135-139.doi: 10.16035/j.issn.1001-7283.2021.02.019

;

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Analysis of Field Verification and Benefit on Full Maize Straw Returning with Deep Plowing Mode

Liu Jianzhao1(), Yuan Jingchao1, Liang Yao1, He Yu2, Zhang Shuimei1, Shi Haipeng3, Cai Hongguang1(), Ren Jun1()   

  1. 1Agricultural Resources and Environment Institute, Jilin Academy of Agricultural Sciences/Key Laboratory of Plant Nutrition and Agro-Environment in Northeast Region of Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Changchun 130033, Jilin, China
    2Agricultural Technology Extension Station of Gongzhuling, Gongzhuling 136100, Jilin, China
    3Agricultural Technology Extension Station of Yitong Manchu Autonomous County, Siping 130700, Jilin, China
  • Received:2020-05-21 Revised:2020-12-31 Online:2021-04-15 Published:2021-04-16
  • Contact: Cai Hongguang,Ren Jun E-mail:justin0117@yeah.net;caihongguang1981@163.com;renjun557@163.com

Abstract:

This research was based on the technology by full maize straw returning with deep plowing, including some key techniques such as precision and keeping a full stand of seedlings, disease and insect control, nutrient-efficient management, and mechanical harvesting. The mode of full maize straw returning with deep plowing was established on the whole maize planting chain, it was demonstrated in 18 scale business entities of Gongzhuling and Yitong in 2018-2019 of Jilin province. The result showed that all scale business entities were the trend of increasing yield. Compared with ordinary farmers, the increase rate for yield was 4.5%-11.9% and the average increasing yield was 7.8%. Fertilizer and water efficiency increased by 7.8% on average. Because of the scale operation, the production cost was reduced largely, only full maize straw returning with deep plowing mode had increased a little. Compared with the operation of ordinary farmers, the net profit increased by 13.0%-16.2%. This indicate that the technology model realizes the multiple benefits of soil fertility cultivation, increasing yield and income by optimizing the whole planting chain, which can widely apply in the central and southern area of Jilin province.

Key words: Maize, Straw returning, Deep plow, Resource use efficiency

Table 1

The basic information of scale business entities"

地点Site 规模经营主体Scale business entities 种植面积Planting area(hm2) 地址Address
公主岭Gongzhuling 公主岭市朝阳坡镇东兴隆农机作业专业合作社 30 公主岭市朝阳坡镇
公主岭市军平种植家庭农场 30 公主岭市朝阳坡镇
公主岭市新大房身种植农民专业合作社 30 公主岭市朝阳坡镇
公主岭市彦君种植专业合作社 30 公主岭市朝阳坡镇
朝阳坡镇云飞农机合作社 15 公主岭市朝阳坡镇
公主岭市虹博农机专业合作社 30 公主岭市刘房子街道
公主岭市志辉农机农民专业合作社 30 公主岭市刘房子街道
公主岭市长青农机专业合作社 20 公主岭市刘房子街道
富丰家庭农场 30 公主岭市刘房子街道
公主岭市红岩种植专业合作社 30 公主岭市黑林子镇
公主岭市怀德镇达康农机种植专业合作社 15 公主岭市怀德镇
公主岭市黑林子镇亚军种植家庭农场 20 公主岭市黑林子镇
伊通Yitong 伊通满族自治县大孤山镇宏恩家庭农场 15 伊通满族自治县大孤山镇
伊通满族自治县金辉种植专业合作社 15 伊通满族自治县马鞍山镇
伊通满族自治县靠山镇庄家村博硕家庭农场 15 伊通满族自治县靠山镇
伊通满族自治县玉鹏农机专业合作社 20 伊通满族自治县伊通镇
伊通满族自治县大孤山镇海艳家庭农场 12 伊通满族自治县大孤山镇
伊通满族自治县福宁联丰种植专业合作社 15 伊通满族自治县伊通镇

Fig.1

The precipitations of Gongzhuling and Yitong during 2018-2019"

Table 2

Main operating and mechanical requirement of full maize straw returning and soil fertility improvement with deep plowing mode"

作业名称
Operation name
作业时间
Operation time
作业机械(品牌/型号)
Operation machine (band/mode)
牵引动力指标
Traction power index (kW)
播种+施肥Sow+fertilize 4月下旬-5月上旬 免耕播种机(康达、马思奇、北大荒、德邦大为/4行) >29.42 (40马力)
除草Weeding 5月上旬-6月上旬 悬挂式喷杆喷雾机(3wpx-500,喷幅7.5~18.1m) >29.42 (40马力)
病虫害防治Disease and insect control 7-8月 无人机(大疆、汉和)
收获Harvesting 10月中上旬 自走式玉米收获机(春雨、天人、约翰迪尔、巨明、
新疆牧神/4YZP-4M、4YZP-5M)
>88.27 (120马力)
秸秆粉碎Straw smashing 10-11月 秸秆粉碎机(河北农友、沈阳佳宝/宽幅200~260mm) >60.20 (90马力)
秸秆深翻Straw with deep plowing 10-11月 栅栏式液压翻转犁(鲁耕、隆丰、福星凯恩、福生、
农飞、冀农牌、辽宁现代/4铧、犁幅450mm)
>102.98 (140马力)
其他耕、整地
Other ploughing or soil preparation
11月下旬/
4月中下旬
联合整地机(力士、金桥/1ZL-3.6) >95.63 (130马力)

Table 3

The yield performance of field verification under different technique modes"

地点
Site
处理
Treatment
2018年 2019年
籽粒产量
Grain yield
(kg/hm2)
平均值
Mean
(kg/hm2)
增产
Yield
increase (%)
变异
系数
CV (%)
籽粒产量
Grain yield
(kg/hm2)
平均值
Mean
(kg/hm2)
增产
Yield
increase (%)
变异
系数
CV (%)
公主岭Gongzhuling Opt 10800~11500 11080 7.7 2.1 11100~11700 11395 7.3 1.8
Tra 9800~11000 10285 - 4.2 10000~11200 10615 - 3.9
伊通Yitong Opt 10000~11000 10440 8.0 3.7 10350~11350 10770 8.1 3.6
Tra 9100~10300 9670 - 4.7 9250~10500 9965 - 6.3

Table 4

The productive efficiency of fertilizer and water under different technique modes"

地点
Site
处理
Treatment
2018年 2019年
化肥生产效率
Productive efficiency
of fertilizer(kg/kg)
水分生产效率
Productive efficiency
of water (kg/mm)
化肥生产效率
Productive efficiency
of fertilizer(kg/kg)
水分生产效率
Productive efficiency
of water (kg/mm)
公主岭Gongzhuling Opt 26.25 18.52 28.75 19.00
Tra 24.36 17.19 26.78 17.70
伊通Yitong Opt 24.69 14.60 29.97 10.92
Tra 22.87 13.52 27.72 10.11

Table 5

The cost accounting under different technique modes 元/hm2 yuan/hm2"

项目Item 公主岭Gongzhuling 伊通Yitong
规模经营主体Opt 普通农户Tra 规模经营主体Opt 普通农户Tra
机械作业Mechanical operation
施肥、播种Fertilization and sowing 400~500 900~1200 400~500 800~1000
除草Weeding 50~80 150~200 50~80 150~200
病虫害防治Disease and insect control 100~160 200 120~150 200
机械收获Mechanical harvesting 350~500 1000~1200 400~500 1100~1200
秸秆深翻还田Straw with deep plowing 600~800 - 700~800 -
其他耕、整地Other ploughing or soil preparation - 500~800 - 500~800
合计Total 1500~2040 2250~3600 1670~2030 2750~3400
农资投入Agricultural materials investment
化肥Chemical fertilizer 2200~2750 2500~2990 2125~2500 2250~3000
种子Seed 500~700 800~960 500~700 800~960
农药Pestcide 200~300 150~250 200~300 150~250
雇工Hired worker 120~230 600~900 100~210 500~800
合计Total 3020~3980 4050~5100 3125~3710 3700~5010
土地流转Land transfer 10000 - 7500 -
项目补贴Project subsidies
秸秆还田作业补贴Operation subsidies with straw return 1500 - 1500 -
其他农业补贴Other subsidies - 3500 - 3500
合计Total 1500 3500 1500 3500
玉米单产Maize yield (kg/hm2) 11 080~11 395 10 285~10 615 10 440~10 770 9670~9965
净利润Net profile 5991~6924 13 907~15 213 8197~8746 13 027~14 456
[1] 鞠正山. 重视黑土资源保护,强化黑土退化防治. 国土资源情报, 2016(2):22-25.
[2] 刘旭, 李双异, 彭畅, 等. 深松和秸秆深还对黑土有机碳及其活性组分的影响. 土壤通报, 2019,50(3):602-608.
[3] 刘忆莹, 裴久渤, 汪景宽. 东北典型黑土区耕地有机质与pH的空间分布规律及其相互关系. 农业资源与环境学报, 2019,36(6):738-743.
[4] Piazza G, Pellegrino E, Moscatelli M C, et al. Long-term conservation tillage and nitrogen fertilization effects on soil aggregate distribution,nutrient stocks and enzymatic activities in bulk soil and occluded microaggregates. Soil and Tillage Research, 2020,196:104482.
[5] Koutsos T, Menexes G. Economic,agronomic,and environmental benefits from the adoption of precision agriculture technologies:a systematic review. International Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Information Systems, 2019,10(1):40-56.
[6] Chris D. Considerations in establishing a health risk management system for effluent irrigation in modern agriculture. Israel Journal of Plant Sciences, 2011,59:125-137.
[7] Alyokhin A, Nault B, Brown B. Soil conservation practices for insect pest management in highly disturbed agroecosystems - a review. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata, 2020,168(1):7-27.
[8] Al-Kaisi M M, Kwaw-Mensah D. Quantifying soil carbon change in a long-term tillage and crop rotation study across Iowa landscapes. Soil Science Society of America Journal, 2020,84(1):182-202.
[9] Liben F M, Wortmann C S, Tirfessa A. Geospatial modeling of conservation tillage and nitrogen timing effects on yield and soil properties. Agricultural Systems, 2020,177:102720.
[10] 王鸿斌, 陈丽梅, 赵兰坡, 等. 吉林玉米带先行耕作制度对黑土肥力退化的影响. 农业工程学报, 2009,25(9):301-305.
[11] 蔡红光, 梁尧, 刘慧涛, 等. 东北地区玉米秸秆全量深翻还田耕种技术研究. 玉米科学, 2019,27(5):123-129.
[12] 梁卫, 袁静超, 张洪喜, 等. 东北地区玉米秸秆还田培肥机理及相关技术研究进展. 东北农业科学, 2016,41(2):44-49.
[13] 王立春, 王永军, 边少锋, 等. 吉林省玉米高产高效绿色发展的理论与实践. 吉林农业大学学报, 2018,40(4):383-392.
[14] 蔡红光, 梁尧, 闫孝贡, 等. 东北黑土区秸秆不同还田方式下玉米产量及养分累积特征. 玉米科学, 2016,24(5):68-74.
[1] Feng Yong, Hou Xuguang, Xue Chunlei, Zhang Laihou, Song Guodong, Su Minli, Fu Xiaohua, Sun Yuyan. Division of Suitable Ecological Regions of Maize Varieties in Inner Mongolia [J]. Crops, 2024, 40(1): 23-30.
[2] Wang Haitao, Ren Chunmei, Dong Yan, Li Shuo, Cheng Zhaobang, Ji Yinghua. Molecular Detection and Identification of Maize Yellow Mosaic Virus on Sorghum in Huai’an, Jiangsu [J]. Crops, 2024, 40(1): 233-238.
[3] Ma Juan, Huang Lu, Yu Ting, Guo Guojun, Zhu Weihong, Liu Jingbao. Multi-Locus Genome-Wide Association Study and Genomic Prediction for General Combining Ability of Maize Ear Diameter [J]. Crops, 2024, 40(1): 31-39.
[4] Wu Ying, Hu Die, Li Ting, Duan Qianyuan, Wei Ningning, Zhang Xinghua, Xu Shutu, Xue Jiquan. Analysis of WRKY Transcription Factor IIc Subfamily in Maize and Its Expression Profile under Drought [J]. Crops, 2024, 40(1): 80-89.
[5] Jin Yu, Guo Xinyu, Zhang Ying, Li Dazhuang, Wang Jinglu. Stomatal Phenotypic Identification and Research Progress in Maize Leaves [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(6): 1-10.
[6] Wu Qi, Ming Bo, Gao Shang, Yang Hongye, Zhang Chuan, Chu Zhendong, Li Shaokun. Research on the Construction Strategy of Maize Grain Dehydration Model in Cold Northeast China [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(6): 108-113.
[7] Liang Zhongyu, Xue Jun, Zhang Guoqiang, Ming Bo, Shen Dongping, Fang Liang, Zhou Linli, Zhang Yuqin, Yang Hengshan, Wang Keru, Li Shaokun. Effects of Phosphorus Application Rate on Lodging Resistance of Maize under Integrated Water and Fertilizer [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(6): 190-194.
[8] Cao Qingjun, Li Gang, Yang Hao, Lou Yuyong, Yang Fentuan, Kong Fanli, Li Xinbei, Zhao Xinkai, Jiang Xiaoli. The Effects of Different Tillage Practices on Seedbed Quality and Its Relationships with Seedling Population Construction and Grain Yield of Spring Maize [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(5): 249-254.
[9] Yu Le, Li Lin, Huang Hongjuan, Huang Zhaofeng, Zhu Wenda, Wei Shouhui. Weed Species Composition and Community Characterization in Maize Fields in Hubei Province [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(5): 272-279.
[10] Yang Zongying, Xiao Gui, Zhang Hongwei. Whole-Genome Predictive Analysis of Fresh Weight per Plant Using the Maize F1 Population [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(5): 43-48.
[11] Qu Haitao, Li Zhongnan, Wang Yueren, Ma Yiwen, Xiang Yang, Wu Shenghui, Tan Zhuo, Wang Chun, Wei Qiang, Luo Yao, Li Guangfa. Study on Genetic and Breeding Effects of 100-Grain Weight in Maize [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(5): 66-70.
[12] Yang Mi, Wang Meijuan, Xu Haitao. Study on the Dynamic Development Difference of Husk of Maize Inbred Lines in Different Ecological Regions [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(5): 81-90.
[13] Yuan Liuzheng, Wang Huiqiang, WangQiuling , Zhu Shidie, ZhaoYueqiang , Yuan Manman, Wang Huitao, Zhang Yundong, Liu Jiayou, Yuan Yongqiang. Analysis of Combining Ability and Genetic Effect of Maize Inbred Lines under Shading Condition [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(4): 104-109.
[14] Zheng Fei, Chen Jing, Cui Yakun, Kong Lingjie, Meng Qingchang, Li Jie, Liu Ruixiang, Zhang Meijing, Zhao Wenming, Chen Yanping. Screening of High and Stable Yield Maize Varieties Suitable for Grain Mechanical Harvesting in Different Ecological Areas of the Huaibei Region [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(4): 110-117.
[15] Wang Liping, Bai Lanfang, Wang Tianhao, Wang Xiaoxuan, Bai Yunhe, Wang Yufen. Effects of Different Nitrogen Levels on Nitrogen Accumulation and Transport in Silage Maize [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(4): 165-173.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!