Crops ›› 2021, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (4): 166-171.doi: 10.16035/j.issn.1001-7283.2021.04.025

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Effects of Paecilomyces variotii Extract on Yield and Nitrogen Utilization of Summer Maize

Wang Qingbin1,2(), Nie Zhentian3, Lu Jiechun2, Peng Chun’e3, Zhang Min1(), Meng Hui2, Liu Zhiguo2, Geng Quanzheng2   

  1. 1National Engineering Laboratory for Efficient Utilization of Soil and Fertilizer Resources/College of Resources and Environment, Shandong Agricultural University, Tai’an 271018, Shandong, China
    2Shandong Pengbo Biotechnology Co., Ltd., Tai’an 271018, Shandong, China
    3State Key Laboratory of Crop Biology/College of Life Sciences, Shandong Agricultural University, Tai’an 271018, Shandong, China
  • Received:2020-09-02 Revised:2021-06-18 Online:2021-08-15 Published:2021-08-13
  • Contact: Zhang Min E-mail:wangqingbin1203@163.com;minzhang2002@163.com

Abstract:

To explore the effects of nitrogen application amount, nitrogen fertilizer types, and Paecilomyces variotii extract (ZNC) on yield, nitrogen utilization efficiency (NUE), and economic returns of summer maize, a field experiment was carried out with "Zhengdan 958" as the material and "ZNC" as plant immune inducer. The results showed that compared with nitrogen fertilizer without ZNC, nitrogen fertilizer with ZNC increased the yield of maize by 2.14%-9.00%, NUE of maize significantly increased by 11.21%-104.00%, and net profit increased by 379.05-1743.38 yuan/ha. Meanwhile, yield, NUE, and net profit of controlled-release urea with ZNC (CRUZ) treatment increased by 5.73%, 185.00%, and 1311.61 yuan/ha, respectively, compared with that of urea with ZNC. In addition, compared with conventional urea treatment, treatment with urea nitrogen reduced by 20% had no significant difference in yield when applied with ZNC but NUE, N agronomic efficiency, and N partial productivity of it increased significantly which led to the net income increased significantly by 647.89 yuan/ha. Therefore, the combination of controlled release urea with ZNC could achieve a synergistic effect on yield, nitrogen utilization efficiency, and net profit of summer maize while the combination of reducing 20% conventional urea with ZNC reduced the amount of fertilizer but achieved increasing production of maize.

Key words: Maize, Nitrogen fertilizer, Paecilomyces variotii extract, Yield, Nitrogen utilization efficiency

Table 1

Types and dosage of fertilization in different treatments"

编号
Number
处理
Treatment
N(控释尿素)
N (controlled release urea) (kg/hm2)
N(尿素)
N (urea) (kg/hm2)
ZNC
(mg/hm2)
P2O5
(kg/hm2)
K2O
(kg/hm2)
CK 不施氮肥 - - - 75 150
80%U 尿素减氮20% - 180 - 75 150
80%UZ 尿素减氮20%配施ZNC - 180 375 75 150
U 常规尿素 - 225 - 75 150
UZ 常规尿素配施ZNC - 225 375 75 150
80%CRU 控释尿素减氮20% 180 - - 75 150
80%CRUZ 控释尿素减氮20%配施ZNC 180 - 375 75 150
CRU 控释尿素 225 - - 75 150
CRUZ 控释尿素配施ZNC 225 - 375 75 150

Fig.1

Effects of nitrogen fertilizer combined with ZNC on the fresh weight of maize at flowering stage Different lowercase letters show significant difference at the level of 0.05"

Table 2

Effects of nitrogen fertilizer combined with ZNC on maize yield and its components"

处理
Treatment
穗行数
Row number per ear
行粒数
Seed number per row
百粒重
100-grain weight (g)
产量
Yield (kg/hm2)
增产Yield increase (%)
80%U U
CK 13.80±0.35b 26.00±0.58d 32.69±1.29b 7 793.97±138.45f -14.83 -23.15
U 15.20±0.23a 29.35±0.14b 34.13±0.45ab 10 142.37±249.18bcd 10.84 -
UZ 15.07±0.27a 29.45±0.03b 35.06±0.40ab 10 359.42±154.56abc 13.21 2.14
CRU 15.33±0.74a 29.20±0.81b 35.99±0.95a 10 702.51±322.08ab 16.96 5.52
CRUZ 14.90±0.40ab 31.00±0.46a 35.63±0.49a 10 953.42±271.95a 19.70 8.00
80%U 14.60±0.53ab 27.55±0.03c 34.19±0.51ab 9 150.69±232.19e - -9.78
80%UZ 14.40±0.00ab 29.25±0.72b 35.17±1.65ab 9 974.36±168.11cd 9.00 -1.66
80%CRU 14.67±0.13ab 27.75±0.20c 35.66±0.27a 9 664.58±88.48de 5.62 -4.71
80%CRUZ 14.67±0.13ab 28.40±0.40bc 35.86±0.77a 9 940.67±30.80cd 8.63 -1.99

Table 3

Effects of nitrogen fertilizer combined with ZNC on nitrogen utilization of maize"

处理
Treatment
氮素积累量
N accumulation (kg/hm2)
氮素投入量
N input (kg/hm2)
氮素利用率
N utilization efficiency (%)
氮肥农学效率
N agronomic efficiency (kg/kg)
氮肥偏生产力
N partial productivity (kg/kg)
CK 152.30±0.81h 0 - - -
U 190.21±0.89e 225 17.93±0.40f 10.40±0.05e 44.09±0.50f
UZ 194.75±0.88d 225 19.94±0.39e 11.46±0.10cde 46.68±0.24e
CRU 235.39±0.58b 225 37.08±0.27b 12.99±0.11b 48.86±0.60d
CRUZ 277.73±1.42a 225 56.82±0.63a 14.23±0.33a 49.87±0.24d
80%U 173.16±0.26g 180 12.93±0.14h 8.83±0.02f 52.13±0.02c
80%UZ 188.94±0.42e 180 21.70±0.23d 12.11±0.93bc 58.18±0.66a
80%CRU 178.88±0.66f 180 16.11±0.37g 10.88±0.01de 54.18±0.01b
80%CRUZ 209.14±0.08c 180 32.92±0.05c 11.90±0.05bcd 55.23±0.17b

Table 4

The effects of nitrogen fertilizer combined with ZNC on maize economic benefit"

处理
Treatment
产量
Yield (kg/hm2)
肥料投入(元/hm2)
Fertilizer input (yuan/hm2)
总成本(元/hm2)
Total cost (yuan/hm2)
产值(元/hm2)
Output value (yuan/hm2)
净收益(元/hm2)
Net profit (yuan/hm2)
CK 7 793.97±138.45f 720.12 8 720.12 12 470.36±221.52g 3 717.48±56.74i
U 10 142.37±249.18bcd 1 260.18 9 260.18 16 227.79±398.69cd 6 955.89±20.29e
UZ 10 359.42±154.56abc 1 260.18 9 260.18 16 575.08±247.30bc 7 334.94±34.72d
CRU 10 702.51±322.08ab 1 305.18 9 305.18 17 146.76±39.40ab 7 841.58±39.40b
CRUZ 10 953.42±271.95a 1 305.18 9 305.18 17 594.22±119.06a 8 646.55±87.36a
80%U 9 150.69±232.19e 1 152.15 9 152.15 15 012.55±6.29f 5 860.40±6.29h
80%UZ 9 974.36±168.11cd 1 152.15 9 152.15 16 755.92±191.14bc 7 603.78±191.14c
80%CRU 9 664.58±88.48de 1 188.15 9 188.15 15 463.32±141.57ef 6 416.71±3.21g
80%CRUZ 9 940.67±30.80cd 1 188.15 9 188.15 15 905.07±49.27de 6 716.92±49.27f
[1] 陈迪文, 周文灵, 敖俊华, 等. 海藻提取物对甜玉米产量、品质及氮素利用的影响. 作物杂志, 2020(2):134-139.
[2] 朱兆良, 金继运. 保障我国粮食安全的肥料问题. 植物营养与肥料报, 2013,19(2):259-273.
[3] 蔡东芳, 张书芬, 王建平, 等. 控释氮肥运筹对丰油10号光合性能及产量的影响. 作物杂志, 2018(2):136-140.
[4] 解文艳, 周怀平, 杨振兴, 等. 不同缓控释氮肥对连作春玉米产量及氮肥去向的影响. 水土保持学报, 2019,33(3):207-214.
[5] 关瑞, 张民, 诸葛玉平, 等. 控释氮肥一次性基施提高谷子产量和氮素利用率. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2019,25(4):639-646.
[6] 尹彩侠, 李前, 孔丽丽, 等. 控释氮肥减施对春玉米产量、氮素吸收及转运的影响. 中国农业科学, 2018,51(20):3941-3950.
[7] 王祥尊, 蒲文勇, 孙剑峰, 等. 几种植物免疫诱抗剂拌种在小麦上的应用初探. 南方农业, 2017,11(10):28-30.
[8] 王晓丹, 阮松林, 肖文斐, 等. 免疫诱抗剂对水稻秧苗生长与产量形成的影响. 浙江农业科学, 2019,60(11):1999-2001.
[9] 邱德文. 植物免疫诱抗剂的研究进展与应用前景. 中国农业科技导报, 2014,16(1):39-45.
[10] Barraquio W L, Revilla L, Ladha J K. Isolation of endophytic diazotrophic bacteria from wetland rice. Plant and Soil, 1997,194(1/2):15-24.
[11] Aken B V, Peres C M, Doty S L, et al. Methylobacterium populi sp. nov. a novel aerobic, pink-pigmented, facultatively methylotrophic, methane-utilizing bacterium isolated from poplar trees (Populus deltoides×nigra DN34). International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology, 2004,54(4):1191-1196.
[12] Peng C, Zhang A, Wang Q, et al. Ultrahigh-activity immune inducer from endophytic fungi induces tobacco resistance to virus by SA pathway and RNA silencing. BMC Plant Biology, 2020,20(1):169.
[13] Malinowski D P, Brauer D K, Belesky D P. The endophyte Neotyphodium coenophialum affects root morphology of tall fescue grown under phosphorus deficiency. Journal of Agronomy and Crop, 1999,183(1):53-60.
[14] 陈水红, 曹莹, 陈泰祥, 等. 内生真菌提高禾草抗盐碱性研究进展. 生物技术通报, 2018,34(4):35-42.
[15] 王晓琪, 姚媛媛, 刘之广, 等. 宛氏拟青霉提取物对盐胁迫下水稻幼苗的生理适应性. 农业资源与环境学报, 2020,37(1):98-105.
[16] 贾春花, 刘之广, 张民, 等. 宛氏拟青霉提取物对樱桃萝卜产量及品质的影响. 农业资源与环境学报, 2019,36(2):176-183.
[17] 秦瑞劼, 张民, 刘之广, 等. 植物诱抗剂对尿素氮利用率和小麦产量的影响. 水土保持学报, 2018,32(4):327-332,345.
[18] 赵洪猛, 杨贵婷, 刘之广, 等. 聚氨酯包膜和喷涂诱抗剂提高滨海盐化潮土玉米产量和磷肥利用率的协同效应. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2019,25(12):2189-2196.
[19] Chen Q, Li Z, Qu Z, et al. Maize yield and root morphological characteristics affected by controlled-release diammonium phosphate and Paecilomyces variotii extracts. Field Crops Research, 255(3):107862.
[20] 司林静, 韩乾, 刘明, 等. 2019 年泰安市四季气候特征及影响分析. 现代农业科技, 2020(18):171-172.
[21] Zheng W, Zhang M, Liu Z, et al. Combining controlled-release urea and normal urea to improve the nitrogen use efficiency and yield under wheat-maize double cropping system. Field Crops Research, 2016,197:52-62.
[22] Abbasi M K, Tahir M M, Rahim N. Effect of N fertilizer source and timing on yield and N use efficiency of rainfed maize (Zea mays L.) in Kashmir-Pakistan. Geoderma, 2013,195-196:87-93.
[23] 高飞, 李威, 逄妍, 等. 不同氮肥处理对春玉米氮吸收分配及产量的影响. 作物杂志, 2015(4):97-101.
[24] 高逖, 李春喜, 周宝元, 等. 种植密度和施氮量耦合对夏玉米干物质积累及氮肥利用率的影响. 玉米科学, 2017,25(5):105-111.
[25] 李嘉, 吕慎强, 杨泽宇, 等. 氮肥运筹对黄土塬区春玉米产量、效益和氮肥利用率的综合效应. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2020,26(1):32-41.
[26] 刘梦, 梁茜, 葛均筑, 等. 不同密度下施氮量对夏玉米产量和氮肥利用效率的影响. 华北农学报, 2019,34(6):153-159.
[27] 卢艳丽, 白由路, 王磊, 等. 华北小麦-玉米轮作区缓控释肥应用效果分析. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2011,17(1):209-215.
[28] 周丽平, 杨俐苹, 白由路, 等. 夏玉米施用不同缓释化处理氮肥的效果及氮肥去向. 中国农业科学, 2018,51(8):1527-1536.
[29] 刘诗璇, 陈松岭, 蒋一飞, 等. 控释氮肥与普通氮肥配施对东北春玉米氮素利用及土壤养分有效性的影响. 生态环境学报, 2019,28(5):939-947.
[30] 岳克, 马雪, 宋晓, 等. 新型氮肥及施氮量对玉米产量和氮素吸收利用的影响. 中国土壤与肥料, 2018(4):75-81.
[31] 刘诗璇, 陈松岭, 蒋一飞, 等. 控释氮肥与普通氮肥配施对东北春玉米氮素利用及土壤养分有效性的影响. 生态环境学报, 2019,28(5):939-947.
[32] 郭萍, 朱从桦, 査丽, 等. 缓释尿素与普通尿素不同配比对玉米氮代谢酶和氮素利用的影响. 中国土壤与肥料, 2016(6):99-105.
[33] Lu C, Liu H, Jiang D, et al. Paecilomyces variotii extracts(ZNC) enhance plant immunity and promote plant growth. Plant and Soil, 2019,441(1):383-397.
[34] Wang X, Yao Y, Chen B, et al. Paecilomyces variotii extracts and controlled-release urea synergistically increased nitrogen use efficiency and rice yield. ACS Omega, 2020,5(22):13303-13311.
[1] Pan Gaofeng, Wang Benfu, Chen Bo, Fang Zhenbing, Zhao Shasha, Tian Yonghong. Effects of Seeding Date on Yield, Growth Period and Utilization of Temperature and Sunshine of Different Types of Japonica Rice in North Central of Hubei Province [J]. Crops, 2021, 37(4): 105-111.
[2] Gao Jie, Feng Guangcai, Li Xiaorong, Li Qingfeng, Wang Can, Zhang Guobing, Zhou Lengbo, Peng Qiu. Effects of Nitrogen Fertilizer on Yield and Nitrogen Use Characteristics in Waxy Sorghum Cultivar "Hongyingzi" [J]. Crops, 2021, 37(4): 118-122.
[3] Tong Tianyi, Cai Jianxuan, Zhang Jisheng, Li Lin, Ma Lin, He Roujing, Tang Xiangru. Effects of Fertilizer Types on Yield, Quality and Aroma of Fragrant Rice [J]. Crops, 2021, 37(4): 152-158.
[4] Wu Ke, Xie Huimin, Liu Wenqi, Mo Bingmao, Wei Guoliang, Lu Xian, Li Zhuanglin, Deng Senxia, Wei Shanqing, Liang He, Jiang Ligeng. Effects of Nitrogen, Phosphorus and Potassium Fertilizer on Rice Grain Yield and Yield Components in Double Cropping Rice Area of Southern China [J]. Crops, 2021, 37(4): 178-183.
[5] Wang Zhihua, Zhang Lingyun, Wei Lixing. Comparison Test of Different Triticale Varieties in Winter Fallow Saline Farmland [J]. Crops, 2021, 37(4): 191-195.
[6] Feng Yanfei, Yang Wei, Ren Guoxin, Deng Jie, Li Wenlong, Gao Shuren. Comprehensive Evaluation of Some Maize Hybrids in Heilongjiang Province [J]. Crops, 2021, 37(4): 46-50.
[7] Tao Zhiqiang, Yan Peng, Zhang Xuepeng. Preliminary Study on the Adaptation of Photosynthetic Characteristics to High Temperature at Grain Filling Stages in Different Eras Maize Varieties [J]. Crops, 2021, 37(4): 73-79.
[8] Liu Tianhao, Zhang Yifei, Wang Huaipeng, Yang Kejun, Zhang Jinsong, Sun Yishan, Xiao Shanshan, Xu Rongqiong, Du Jiarui, Li Jiayu, Peng Cheng, Wang Baosheng. Regulating Effects of Foliar Spraying Silicon Fertilizer on Dry Matter Accumulation and Translocation, Grain Yield and Quality of Maize in Cold Region [J]. Crops, 2021, 37(4): 112-117.
[9] Liu Xuetong, Zheng Chunlian, Cao Wei, Dang Hongkai, Cao Caiyun, Li Xiaoshuang, Li Kejiang, Ma Junyong. Effects of Long-Term Located Fertilization on Soil Organic Matter, Nitrogen Forms and Crop Yields [J]. Crops, 2021, 37(4): 130-135.
[10] Liang Qian, Wu Qingshan, Ge Junzhu, Wu Xidong, Yang Yong’an, Hou Haipeng, Zhang Yao, Ma Zhiqi. Effects of Sowing Date on Rain-Fed Summer Maize Yield Formation and Resource Utilization in North China Plain [J]. Crops, 2021, 37(4): 136-143.
[11] Zhao Baoping, Liu Jinghui, Ren Changzhong. Research Progress of Physiological Mechanism of Yield Formation in Oats [J]. Crops, 2021, 37(3): 1-7.
[12] Wu Zhifeng, Liu Kaili, Le Lihong, Chen Zhongping, Tang Shuangqin, Li Zujun, Han Ruicai, Zeng Yanhua, Zeng Yongjun, Pan Xiaohua, Shi Qinghua, Wu Ziming. Study on Relieving Cold Stress of Direct-Seeded Late Rice at Heading Stage by Chemical Control [J]. Crops, 2021, 37(3): 114-119.
[13] Zhang Jie, Chen Xin, Gao Fangfang, Ma Yajun, Liu Yanyan, Wu Cainü. Effects of Increased Application of Bio-Organic Fertilizer on Yield and Quality of Red Kidney Bean [J]. Crops, 2021, 37(3): 161-166.
[14] Meng Xiangyu, Ran Cheng, Liu Baolong, Zhao Zhexuan, Bai Jingjing, Geng Yanqiu. Effects of Straw Returning to Field and Nitrogen Application on Soil Nutrients and Rice Yield in Black Soil Areas of Northeast China [J]. Crops, 2021, 37(3): 167-172.
[15] Zhao Xuanwei, Zhao Yajie, Tian Zhendong, Hu Shuping, Zhao Rong, Ren Yaning, Bao Haizhu, Gao Julin. Response of Dry Matter Transportion and Yield to Sowing Date and Planting Density on Sunflower [J]. Crops, 2021, 37(3): 185-189.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!