Crops ›› 2021, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (4): 191-195.doi: 10.16035/j.issn.1001-7283.2021.04.029

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Comparison Test of Different Triticale Varieties in Winter Fallow Saline Farmland

Wang Zhihua1(), Zhang Lingyun2(), Wei Lixing1   

  1. 1Dongying Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Dongying 257091, Shandong, China
    2Dongying Vocational Institute, Dongying 257091, Shandong, China
  • Received:2020-11-13 Revised:2021-06-22 Online:2021-08-15 Published:2021-08-13
  • Contact: Zhang Lingyun E-mail:nkswzh@163.com;824540928@qq.com

Abstract:

Triticale has high biological yield, strong adaptability, disease resistance, cold resistance and saline-alkali resistance, few insect pests occurs in the whole growth period, no pesticide spraying is required, it can achieve green high-quality feed production, it is a forage crop with high nutritional value. In the north of China, planting triticale in saline-alkali farmland in winter can solve the problem of lack of land for grain and forage. In this study, six triticale materials were introduced, through the comparison of growth period, lodging resistance, yield and quality of them, the results showed that Jisi No.2 and Triticale 3241 were suitable for growing period, and they had good performance in forage yield, lodging resistance and forage quality, they were suitable for planting in winter fallow saline-alkali farmland in the Yellow River Delta.

Key words: Triticale, Growth period, Lodging resistance, Forage yield, Forage quality

Table 1

Growth period of different triticale varieties 月-日 Month-day"

品种
Variety
试验年份
Duration
播种期
Sowing date
出苗期
Emergence stage
抽穗期
Heading stage
开花期
Flowering stage
成熟期
Maturation stage
中饲1048(对照) 2018-2019 10-18 10-26 05-08 05-13 06-20
Zhongsi 1048 (CK) 2019-2020 10-20 10-30 05-11 05-15 06-21
小黑麦3241 2018-2019 10-18 10-26 05-01 05-07 06-14
Triticale 3241 2019-2020 10-20 10-30 05-03 05-08 06-16
小黑麦2712 2018-2019 10-18 10-26 05-01 05-07 06-14
Triticale 2712 2019-2020 10-20 10-30 05-03 05-08 06-16
冀饲1号 2018-2019 10-18 10-26 04-26 05-02 06-14
Jisi No.1 2019-2020 10-20 10-30 04-27 05-04 06-16
冀饲2号 2018-2019 10-18 10-26 04-28 05-03 06-14
Jisi No.2 2019-2020 10-20 10-30 04-29 05-04 06-16
冀饲1423 2018-2019 10-18 10-26 05-04 05-09 06-16
Jisi 1423 2019-2020 10-20 10-30 05-06 05-12 06-18

Table 2

Comparison of lodging resistance indexes of different triticale varieties"

抗倒伏指标
Lodging resistance index
试验年份
Duration
中饲1048(对照)
Zhongsi 1048 (CK)
小黑麦3241
Triticale 3241
小黑麦2712
Triticale 2712
冀饲1号
Jisi No.1
冀饲2号
Jisi No.2
冀饲1423
Jisi 1423
株高Plant height (cm) 2018-2019 175.60aA 162.60bB 162.10bB 159.25bB 160.36bB 172.80aA
2019-2020 180.10aA 166.20bB 165.50bB 165.00bB 165.20bB 175.50aA
第2节长The second node length (cm) 2018-2019 19.37aA 18.10bB 18.52bB 16.95cC 16.86cC 19.14aA
2019-2020 19.53aA 18.20bB 18.40bB 17.00cC 17.00cC 19.10aA
第2节粗The second node thick (mm) 2018-2019 5.40aA 5.35aA 5.11aA 4.78aA 4.85aA 5.00aA
2019-2020 5.40aA 5.30aA 5.20aA 4.82aA 4.85aA 5.10aA
第2节干重 2018-2019 286.50bB 348.00aA 302.50bB 250.90cC 273.90bB 304.00bB
The second node dry weight (mg) 2019-2020 278.00cC 351.30aA 303.80bB 248.20cC 280.50cC 305.60bB
第2节充实度 2018-2019 14.79cC 19.22aA 16.33bB 14.80cC 16.25bB 15.88bB
The second node density (mg/cm) 2019-2020 14.23cC 19.30aA 16.50bB 14.60cC 16.50bB 16.00bB

Table 3

The biological yields of different triticale varieties at harvest period"

生物产量
Biological yield
试验时间
Duration
中饲1048(对照)
Zhongsi 1048 (CK)
小黑麦3241
Triticale 3241
小黑麦2712
Triticale 2712
冀饲1号
Jisi No.1
冀饲2号
Jisi No.2
冀饲1423
Jisi 1423
鲜草产量Fresh yield (kg/hm2) 2018-2019 38 502.0cC 48 253.5aA 40 285.0cC 36 801.0cC 47 169.0aA 40 929.0bB
2019-2020 40 107.7dD 56 944.6aA 53 066.9bB 45 072.5cC 52 175.5bB 52 026.4bB
干草产量Hay yield (kg/hm2) 2018-2019 11 050.1bB 13 028.3aA 10 463.6bBc 11 813.1bB 14 292.2aA 10 641.5bB
2019-2020 11 693.2dD 15 307.7aA 13 606.8cC 15 227.2aA 15 310.6aA 14 683.1bB
鲜干比 2018-2019 3.48bB 3.70aA 3.85aA 3.12bB 3.30bB 3.85aA
Ratio of fresh yield to hay yield 2019-2020 3.43bB 3.72aA 3.90aA 2.96cC 3.41bB 3.54bB

Table 4

The quality traits of different triticale varieties %"

品质性状
Quality trait
试验年份
Duration
中饲1048(对照)
Zhongsi 1048 (CK)
小黑麦3241
Triticale 3241
小黑麦2712
Triticale 2712
冀饲1号
Jisi No.1
冀饲2号
Jisi No.2
冀饲1423
Jisi 1423
粗蛋白含量 2018-2019 6.84bB 7.23aA 7.01aA 7.25aA 7.29aA 6.59bB
Crude protein content 2019-2020 7.32bB 7.53bB 8.38aA 8.13aA 8.50aA 7.37bB
粗脂肪含量 2018-2019 2.38aA 2.47aA 2.50aA 2.59aA 2.20aA 2.49aA
Crude fat content 2019-2020 2.20bB 2.81aA 2.50aA 2.55aA 2.55aA 2.80aA
中性洗涤纤维含量 2018-2019 65.01bB 62.05cC 63.25cC 64.72bB 62.56cC 66.60aA
Neutral detergent fiber content 2019-2020 53.14bB 53.06bB 53.72bB 54.96aA 54.34aA 55.21aA
酸性洗涤纤维含量 2018-2019 37.69bB 37.38bB 37.56bB 38.94aA 36.84cC 38.84aA
Acid detergent fiber content 2019-2020 31.70bB 30.50aA 30.62aA 31.87bB 31.52bB 31.09aA
[1] 杨劲松. 中国盐渍土研究的发展历程与展望. 土壤学报, 2008,45(5):837-844.
[2] 孙元枢. 中国小黑麦遗传育种研究与应用. 杭州: 浙江科学技术出版社, 2002.
[3] 许庆方. 小黑麦的特性与应用研究进展. 草原与草坪, 2008,129(4):80-86.
[4] 孙敏, 郭媛. 小黑麦生物学特性、营养价值及利用前景. 山西农业大学学报, 2003(3):200-204.
[5] 郭建文, 田新会, 张舒芸, 等. 拔节期喷施矮壮素对小黑麦抗倒伏性及产量的影响. 甘肃农业大学学报, 2018,53(6):42-49.
[6] 刘玉华, 贾志宽, 韩清芳. 不同苜蓿品种头茬草产量与经济价值的综合评判. 西北农业学报, 2003,12(4):75-81.
[7] 崔凤娟, 田福东, 王振国, 等. 饲用高粱品种品质性状的比较与评价. 草地学报, 2012,20(6):1112-1116.
[8] 阿啟兰, 魏小星, 贾志锋, 等. 14份小黑麦资源在青海民和地区的适应性试验. 中国农学通报, 2019,35(18):154-159.
[9] 吕厚波, 冯安荣, 董瑞, 等. 不同基因型小麦灌浆和抗倒伏性能与籽粒产量的关系. 西北农业学报, 2015,24(6):27-33.
[10] 胡卫国, 张玉娥, 赵虹, 等. 小麦抗倒性评价方法的比较分析. 西北农业学报, 2018,27(12):1780-1788.
[11] 李金才, 尹钧, 魏凤珍. 播种密度对冬小麦茎秆形态特征和抗倒指数的影响. 作物学报, 2005,31(5):662-666.
[12] 刘汉成, 田新会, 杜文华. 小黑麦和黑麦主茎基部第二节间解剖结构特征比较. 草原与草坪, 2018,38(3):56-61.
[13] 董琦, 王爱萍, 梁素明. 小麦基部茎节形态结构特征与抗倒性的研究. 山西农业大学学报, 2003,23(3):188-191.
[14] 李万昌. 小麦株型与产量结构间的协调性分析. 江苏农业学报, 2009,25(5):966-970.
[15] 闵东红, 王辉, 孟超敏, 等. 不同株高小麦品种抗倒伏性与其亚性状及产量相关性研究. 麦类作物学报, 2001,21(4):76-79.
[16] 赵雅姣, 田新会, 杜文华. 饲草型小黑麦在定西地区的最佳刈割期. 草业科学, 2015,32(7):1143-1149.
[17] 李诚, 艾尼瓦尔·哈德尔, 孔广超, 等. 不同饲用小黑麦品种在新疆的最佳收草期研究. 石河子大学学报(自然科学版), 2006,24(4):406-409.
[18] 韩微波, 张月学, 尚晨, 等. 夏播小黑麦生育期品质变化规律研究. 黑龙江农业科学, 2015(8):126-129.
[19] 孟祥君, 韩天虎, 武慧娟. 甘引1号黑麦在天祝县高寒区的最佳刈割期. 草业科学, 2018,35(4):876-881.
[20] 谢楠, 李源, 赵海明, 等. 饲用小黑麦适宜刈割时期及刈割次数研究. 草原与草坪, 2014,34(2):57-62.
[21] 赵方媛, 杜文华, 田新会. 饲料型小黑麦品系的秸秆产量及其营养品质研究. 草地学报, 2019,27(4):913-920.
[22] 王金玲, 董心久, 田成军, 等. 水分胁迫对小黑麦生理生化特性和可溶性蛋白质的影响. 麦类作物学报, 2006,26(5):137-139.
[1] Zhang Yang, Zhang Wei, Zhao Weijun, Shao Rongfeng, Wang Guan, Xue Dingding, Li Jinmei. Variety Screening and Study of Cultivation Technology for Forage Triticale Varieties Based on Principal Component and Grey Relation Analysis [J]. Crops, 2020, 36(3): 117-124.
[2] Guo Qilin,Wu Haiyun,Li Huan,Liu Qing. Ecological Stoichiometric Characteristics of Carbon, Nitrogen and Phosphorus in Leaves and Stems of Different Types of Sweet Potato [J]. Crops, 2020, 36(2): 41-47.
[3] Dong Zhiqiang,Wang Mengmeng,Li Hongyi,Xue Xiaoping,Pan Zhihua,Hou Yingyu,Chen Chen,Li Nan,Li Manhua. Applicability Assessment of WOFOST Model of Growth and Yield of Summer Maize in Shandong Province [J]. Crops, 2019, 35(5): 159-165.
[4] Haibing Wu,Daohong Liu,Ming Zhong,Youyuan Wang. Effects of Water Management and Potash Application on Grain Yield and Lodging Resistance of Rice [J]. Crops, 2019, 35(1): 127-133.
[5] Xiaolan Jing,Zhihua Li,Xun Dong. Effects of Different Sowing Dates on Growth and Yield of Different Millet Varieties [J]. Crops, 2019, 35(1): 146-151.
[6] Wenhui Huang, Hui Wang, Desheng Mei. Research Progress on Lodging Resistance of Crops [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 13-19.
[7] Haiyan Liang, Hai Li, Fengxian Lin, Xiangyu Zhang, Zhi Zhang, Xiaoqiang Song. Field Identification of Different Broom Corn Millet Varieties Lodging Resistance and Evaluation Index Selection and Analysis [J]. Crops, 2018, 34(4): 37-41.
[8] Yue Song,Dabing Xiang,Houbing Huang,Yu Fan,Shuang Wei,Sai Zhang. Lodging Resistance Identification and Evaluation of Different Tartary Buckwheat Cultivars [J]. Crops, 2017, 33(6): 65-71.
[9] Xiaodong Chen,Bin Zhao,Changhao Ji,Bin Zhu,Rui Wang. Differences in Forage Yield and Quality of Barley and Wheat with Proper Cutting Frequency [J]. Crops, 2017, 33(3): 81-84.
[10] Yulin Han,Guihong Yin,Guangyu Yang,Jianwei Tang,Lina Wang,Feng Huang,Qian Zhang,Nannan Li,Yongjun Lü,Shuncheng Li,Shaokui Zou,Yan Gao. Relation of the Stem Characters and Lodging Resistance of Zhoumai 22 [J]. Crops, 2017, 33(2): 34-37.
[11] Kun Zhang,Weisheng Lü,Licheng Duan,Shuixiu Hu,Yongjun Zeng,Xiaohua Pan,Qinghua Shi. Effects of Mechanical Transplanting on Plant Growth and Growth Period in Late Rice [J]. Crops, 2016, 32(5): 112-118.
[12] Lirong Bai,Liran Shi,Xiaoli Guo,Xiaona Zhang. Effects of Water Stress on Physiological Characteristics of Different Genotypes of Triticale and Rye Seedlings [J]. Crops, 2016, 32(4): 118-122.
[13] Xingyan Guo,Danni Liang,Jian Lan. Research on Productive Performance and Nutritive Value of 11 Oat Varieties in Ningxia Irrigation Area [J]. Crops, 2016, 32(4): 105-111.
[14] Jihong Zhou,Sishuai Mao,Junying Wang,Fanyu Meng,Caihua Ye,Chao Li. Temperature Evolution and Indicator of Wheat Growth Period in Beijing [J]. Crops, 2016, 32(3): 116-122.
[15] . [J]. Crops, 2013, 29(3): 107-110.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!