Crops ›› 2021, Vol. 37 ›› Issue (6): 164-170.doi: 10.16035/j.issn.1001-7283.2021.06.026

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Effects of Main Season Stubble Height on Ratoon Season Yield and Rice Quality

Li Yang1(), Yang Xiaolong1, Wang Benfu1, Zhang Zhisheng1, Chen Shaoyu1, Li Jinlan2, Cheng Jianping1()   

  1. 1Food Crops Institute, Hubei Academy of Agricultural Sciences/Hubei Key Laboratory of Food Crop Germplasm and Genetic Improvement, Wuhan 430064, Hubei, China
    2Huanggang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Huanggang 438000, Hubei, China
  • Received:2021-02-02 Revised:2021-10-21 Online:2021-12-15 Published:2021-12-16
  • Contact: Cheng Jianping E-mail:liylcy@163.com;chjp609@163.com

Abstract:

The effects of stubble height in the main season on yield formation and rice quality of the ratoon season were studied to provide theoretical basis for achieving high yield and quality in the ratoon season. Hybrid rice Xinliangyou 223 and conventional rice Huanghuazhan were used as experimental materials. Three stubble heights, 40(high stubble, HS), 20 (middle stubble, MS) and 5cm (low stubble, LS) were designed in main season, and components of different nodes yield, ratoon season rice quality, leaf area index, nitrogen content, net photosynthetic rate (Pn) in ratoon season were studied. The results showed that the yield of the two cultivars decreased with the decrease of stubble height, and the yield of HS treatment (4.13t/ha) was 9.9% and 16.3% higher than that of MS and LS treatments. With the decrease of stubble height, the milling quality of ratooning rice was significantly decreased, and the head rice rate of Xinliangyou 223 was significantly decreased than that of Huanghuazhan. The HS treatment of Xinliangyou 223 was 26.8% and 59.7% higher than that of MS and LS treatments, respectively. With the decrease of stubble height, appearance quality of rice was significantly improved, protein contents decreased, and amylose contents had no significant change. Nitrogen contents of main stems, leaves and new buds in ratoon season were significantly positively correlated with yield, and Pn of HS and MS treatments were significantly higher than that of LS treatment. In conclusion, according to the characteristics of varieties, the stubble height in the main season should be adjusted to promote the synergistic improvement of yield and quality in the ratoon season.

Key words: Ratooning rice, Stubble height, Yield, Rice quality, Photosynthetic characteristics

Table 1

Effects of different treatments on yield and its components of ratoon season rice"

年份
Year
品种
Variety
处理
Treatment
有效穗数
Effective panicles (×106/hm2)
穗粒数
Spikelets per panicle
结实率
Seed-setting rate (%)
千粒重
1000-grain weight (g)
产量
Yield (t/hm2)
2015 新两优223 HS 3.92a 62.5d 73.7c 25.3b 4.45a
MS 3.36b 68.2c 74.1c 25.4b 4.41a
LS 2.61d 74.4b 72.7c 27.1a 3.83b
黄华占 HS 3.13bc 59.4d 86.5a 24.0c 3.70c
MS 2.98c 63.1d 85.5a 22.2d 3.51d
LS 2.59d 84.4a 78.7b 19.6e 3.32d
2017 新两优223 HS 3.97a 64.8c 74.0c 25.2b 4.75a
MS 3.27b 62.0c 73.8c 25.1b 3.91b
LS 2.70d 74.5b 72.4c 26.9a 3.91b
黄华占 HS 2.99c 58.6c 85.8a 24.3c 3.60c
MS 2.93cd 58.7c 85.9a 21.7d 3.18d
LS 2.10e 96.7a 78.5b 19.8e 3.13e

Table 2

Effects of different treatments on grain quality of ratoon season rice"

年份
Year
品种
Variety
处理
Treatment
糙米率
Brown rice rate (%)
整精米率
Head rice rate (%)
垩白粒率
Chalky grain rate (%)
垩白度
Chalkiness degree
直链淀粉含量
Amylose content (%)
蛋白质含量
Protein content (%)
2015 新两优223 HS 78.62a 44.56c 14.30a 2.37a 14.95b 9.69a
MS 78.13a 35.28c 12.99b 1.70b 15.09b 9.56a
LS 76.11b 28.29d 11.07c 1.47b 15.04b 9.22b
黄华占 HS 75.40bc 65.00a 8.92d 2.29a 18.30a 7.27c
MS 74.10c 63.70a 7.58e 1.79b 17.70a 6.27d
LS 71.90d 62.90a 6.07f 1.66b 18.10a 5.98e
2017 新两优223 HS 77.00a 44.20c 14.20a 2.40a 14.90b 9.70a
MS 76.00ab 34.70d 12.70b 1.71bc 15.10b 9.61a
LS 74.90bc 27.30e 11.20c 1.49c 15.20b 9.21b
黄华占 HS 76.50ab 64.20a 8.84d 2.28a 18.40a 7.27c
MS 73.50cd 63.30ab 8.54e 1.78b 18.10a 6.26d
LS 71.70d 61.50b 5.99f 1.66bc 18.40a 5.84e

Table 3

Statistical analysis of the influence of various factors on rice quality"

项目
Item
糙米率
Brown rice rate (%)
整精米率
Head rice rate (%)
垩白粒率
Chalky grain rate (%)
垩白度
Chalkiness degree
直链淀粉含量
Amylose content (%)
蛋白质含量
Protein content (%)
年份Year (Y) * ns ns ns * ns
品种Variety (V) ** ** ** ns ** **
处理Treatment (T) ** ** ** ** ns **
品种×年份V×Y * ns ns ns ns ns
处理×年份T×Y ns ns ns ns ns ns
处理×品种T×V * ** ns ns * **
处理×品种×年份
T×V×Y
ns ns ns ns ns ns

Fig.1

Comparison of LAI between the two rice cultivars at the heading stage in ratoon season Different lowercase letters indicate significant difference at 0.05 level"

Fig.2

Correlations between nitrogen contents of vegetative organs and yield in ratoon season"

Table 4

Effects of different treatments on photosynthetic characteristics of rice at heading stage"

年份Year 品种Variety 处理Treatment Pn [μmol/(m2·s)] Gs [mmol/(m2·s)] Ci (μmol/mol) Tr [mmol/(m2·s)]
2015 新两优223 HS 23.0a 0.723b 312.0ab 7.49a
MS 22.5a 0.612c 285.0b 7.22a
LS 19.3d 0.275e 228.4c 7.33a
黄华占 HS 22.1a 0.912a 339.2a 6.40b
MS 21.0b 0.604c 310.8ab 5.83c
LS 20.3c 0.516d 304.7b 5.51c
2017 新两优223 HS 22.8a 0.658b 301.5b 9.10a
MS 22.4a 0.502c 274.8c 8.76a
LS 21.5b 0.218d 266.8c 8.86a
黄华占 HS 22.1a 0.854a 340.2a 6.52b
MS 21.6b 0.616b 327.0ab 6.34b
LS 19.4c 0.424c 326.7ab 4.20c
[1] Seck P A, Diagne A, Mohanty S, et al. Crops that feed the world rice. Food Security, 2012(4):7-24.
[2] Long S P, Marshall-Colon A, Guang X Z. Meeting the global food demand of the future by engineering crop photosynthesis and yield potential. Cell, 2015, 161:56-66.
doi: 10.1016/j.cell.2015.03.019
[3] 章秀福, 王丹英, 方福平, 等. 中国粮食安全和水稻生产. 农业现代化研究, 2005, 26(2):85-88.
[4] Peng S B, Tang Q Y, Zou Y B. Current status and challenges of rice production in China. Plant Production Science, 2009, 12:3-8.
doi: 10.1626/pps.12.3
[5] Cassman K G, Dobermann A, Walters D T, et al. Meeting cereal demand while protecting natural resources and improving environmental quality. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 2003, 28:315-358.
doi: 10.1146/energy.2003.28.issue-1
[6] Ray D K, Foley J A. Increasing global crop harvest frequency:recent trends and future directions. Environmental Research Letters, 2013, 8:44041.
doi: 10.1088/1748-9326/8/4/044041
[7] Huang M, Chen J N, Cao F B, et al. Increased hill density can compensate for yield loss from reduced nitrogen input in machine-transplanted double-cropped rice. Field Crops Research, 2018, 221:333-338.
doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2017.06.028
[8] 彭少兵. 对转型时期水稻生产的战略思考. 中国科学:生命科学, 2014, 44(8):845-850.
[9] 张上守, 卓传营, 姜照伟, 等. 超高产再生稻产量形成和栽培技术分析. 福建农业学报, 2003(1):1-6.
[10] 江世华, 熊洪, 方文, 等. 四川省再生稻高产综合栽培技术研究. 西南农业大学学报, 1995(3):189-192.
[11] 罗昆. 湖北省再生稻产业发展现状及对策. 湖北农业科学, 2016, 55(12):3001-3002.
[12] Chen Q, He A B, Wang W Q, et al. Comparisons of regeneration rate and yields performance between inbred and hybrid rice cultivars in a direct seeding rice-ratoon rice system in central China. Field Crops Research, 2018, 223:164-170.
doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2018.04.010
[13] 段门俊, 吴芸紫, 田玉聪, 等. 不同品种再生稻产量及品质比较研究. 作物杂志, 2018(2):61-67
[14] 唐文帮, 陈立云, 肖应辉, 等. 再生稻某些性状与产量及产量构成因子的关系. 湖南农业大学学报(自然科学版), 2002(1):1-3.
[15] 熊洪. 杂交稻蓄留再生稻的增产技术分析. 杂交水稻, 1996(5):24-26.
[16] 李阳, 程建平, 赵锋, 等. 植物生长调节剂对再生稻头季分蘖萌发和干物质积累的影响. 湖北农业科学, 2015, 54(24):6154-6156.
[17] 黄新杰, 屠乃美, 易镇邪, 等. 不同激素处理对再生稻产量及相关生理特性的影响. 杂交水稻, 2017, 32(4):71-75.
[18] 易镇邪, 屠乃美, 陈平平. 留桩高度对再生稻根系的影响. 杂交水稻, 2005, 20(1):56-59.
[19] 刘爱中, 邹冬生, 屠乃美, 等. 留桩高度对再生稻生长发育及产量的影响. 安徽农业科学, 2007(17):5120-5121,5172.
[20] Begum M K, Hasan K M, Hossain S M A, et al. Effect of culm cutting height and nitrogenous fertilizer on the yield of ratoon of late boro rice. Pakistan Journal of Agronomy, 2002, 1(4):136-138.
[21] Harrell D L, Bond J A, Blanche S. Evaluation of main-crop stubble height on ratoon rice growth and development. Field Crops Research, 2009, 114:396-403.
doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2009.09.011
[22] 陈小花. 粳稻和籼稻品种的再生特性比较研究. 武汉:华中农业大学, 2013.
[23] 张国发, 王绍华, 尤娟, 等. 结实期不同时段高温对稻米品质的影响. 作物学报, 2006, 32(2):283-287.
[24] 唐湘如, 余铁桥. 灌浆成熟期温度对稻米品质及有关生理生化特性的影响. 湖南农学院学报, 1991, 17(1):1-8.
[25] 刘国华, 邓化冰, 陈立云, 等. 中稻头季稻与再生稻的品质比较研究. 杂交水稻, 2002, 17(1):47-49.
[26] 中华人民共和国农业部. 米质测定方法:NY/T 83-2017. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2017.
[27] 周文新, 易镇邪, 屠乃美, 等. 头季稻齐穗期剑叶光合产物分配与再生稻产量的相关性. 核农学报, 2008, 22(6):860-864.
[28] 易镇邪, 周文新, 屠乃美. 留桩高度对再生稻源库性状与物质运转的影响. 中国水稻科学, 2009, 23(5):509-516.
[29] Dong H L, Chen Q, Wang W Q, et al. The growth and yield of a wet-seeded rice-ratoon rice system in central China. Field Crops Research, 2017, 208:55-59.
doi: 10.1016/j.fcr.2017.04.003
[30] 蒋廷杰, 易镇邪, 屠乃美. 留桩高度对培矮64S/E32再生特性的影响. 湖南农业大学学报(自然科学版), 2005(4):359-363.
[31] 李阳. 不同品种中稻蓄留再生稻产量形成的差异与再生芽化学调控初探. 武汉:华中农业大学, 2014.
[32] 黄志刚, 屠乃美, 江巨鳌, 等. 留桩高度对培两优210再生稻产量和源库性状的影响. 生态学报, 2009, 29(8):4572-4579.
[33] 赵庆勇, 朱镇, 张亚东, 等. 播期和地点对不同生态类型粳稻稻米品质性质的影响. 中国水稻科学, 2013, 27(3):297-304.
[34] Lisle A J, Martin M, Fitzgerald M A. Chalky and translucent rice grains differ in starch composition and structure and cooking properties. Cereal Chemistry, 2000, 77:627-632.
doi: 10.1094/CCHEM.2000.77.5.627
[35] 朱碧岩, 程方民, 吴永常. 结实期温度对稻米粒重和整精米率形成动态的影响. 西北农业学报, 1996(4):36-40.
[36] 朱安, 高捷, 黄健, 等. 水稻根系形态生理及其与稻米品质关系的研究进展. 作物杂志, 2020(2):1-8.
[1] Tang Gang, Liao Ping, Sui Feng, Lü Weisheng, Zhang Jun, Zeng Yongjun, Huang Shan. Effects of Moldboard Plow Tillage under all Straw Returning in Late Rice Season on Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Yield in Double Rice-Cropping System [J]. Crops, 2021, 37(6): 101-107.
[2] Su Wenping, Wang Huan, Aimulaguli·Kuerban , Zhao Xinlin, Xue Lihua, Zhang Jianxin, Liu Jun, Sun Shiren. Comparison of Growth Characteristics and Yields of Different Wheat Varieties Planted in the Approaching Winter in Northern Xinjiang [J]. Crops, 2021, 37(6): 108-114.
[3] Yang Na, Xi Jilong, Wang Ke, Xi Tianyuan, Zhang Jiancheng, Yao Jingzhen, Wang Jian. Effects of Spring Irrigation on Yield and Water Utilization of Late-Sowing Winter Wheat in Southern Shanxi [J]. Crops, 2021, 37(6): 115-121.
[4] Zhou Qiancong, Chen Le, Luo Kang, Liu Mengjie, Song Yongping, Xie Xiaobing, Zeng Yongjun. Effects of Nitrogen Panicle Fertilizer Management on Yield and Quality of Hybrid Late Japonica Rice [J]. Crops, 2021, 37(6): 129-133.
[5] Gao Jia, Wang Jiao, Wang Song, Liu Hongjian, Kang Jia, Shen Hong, Wang Haili, Ren Shaoyong. Effects of Biochar-Based Fertilizer on Soil Urease Activity and Yield of Potato [J]. Crops, 2021, 37(6): 134-138.
[6] Li Xinhao, Li Jun, Wan Lin, Liu Lixin, Liu Junquan, Ma Ni. Effects of No-Tillage and Drilling on Growth, Root System and Yield of Rapeseed (Brassica napus L.) in Hilly Area [J]. Crops, 2021, 37(6): 139-144.
[7] Wang Qi, Li Meijuan, Zhang Jia’en, Tang Jiaxin, Zeng Wenjing, Zhou Lei, Yang Qingxin, Jiang Mingmin, Wu Jiayuan, Luo Mingzhu. Effects of Rice-Fish Co-Culture on Chlorophyll Fluorescence Characteristics and Yield in Rice [J]. Crops, 2021, 37(6): 145-151.
[8] Guo Mingming, Wang Kangjun, Zhang Guangxu, Sun Zhongwei, Li Jun, Zhang Yueshu, Dai Dandan, Chen Feng, Fan Jiwei. Regulation of Sowing Date and Row Spacing on Grain Yield and Quality of Wheat [J]. Crops, 2021, 37(6): 152-158.
[9] Zhang Panpan, Zhang Hongpeng, Guo Yaning. Effects of Two Plant Growth Regulators on Photosynthetic Characteristics and Yield of Proso Millet [J]. Crops, 2021, 37(6): 159-163.
[10] Wang Xin, Wang Cai. Effects of Different Sowing Dates and Seeding Rates on the Growth Characteristics and Yield of Winter Wheat [J]. Crops, 2021, 37(6): 182-188.
[11] Cai Lijun, Zhang Jingtao, Liu Jingqi, Gai Zhijia, Guo Zhenhua, Zhao Guifan. Effects of Long-Term No-Tillage Straw Returning on Soil Organic Carbon and Soybean Yield in Cold Region [J]. Crops, 2021, 37(6): 189-192.
[12] Liu Weixing, Fan Xiaoyu, Zhang Fengye, He Qunling, Chen Lei, Li Ke, Wu Jihua. Effects of Different Preceding Crops and Seed Coating Agent Dosage on Peanut Diseases, Pests and Yield [J]. Crops, 2021, 37(6): 199-204.
[13] Li Xin, Jin Guanghui, Wang Pengcheng, Wang Ziwen. Analysis of Stability of Potato Varieties (Strains) Starch and Yield Performance [J]. Crops, 2021, 37(6): 51-57.
[14] Gao Tiantian, Wang Demei, Wang Yanjie, Yang Yushuang, Chang Xuhong, Zhao Guangcai. Response of Different Spring Wheat Varieties to Nitrogen Treatment [J]. Crops, 2021, 37(6): 67-71.
[15] Chen Zhongcheng, Jin Xijun, Li He, Zhou Weixin, Qiang Binbin, Liu Jia, Zhang Yuxian. Effects of Exogenous Melatonin on Growth, Photosynthetic Fluorescence Characteristics and Yield Components of Adzuki Bean [J]. Crops, 2021, 37(6): 88-94.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!