Crops ›› 2024, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (1): 126-131.doi: 10.16035/j.issn.1001-7283.2024.01.017

;

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Effects of Reducing Nitrogen Fertilizers and Increasing DMPP on Nitrogen Absorption and Utilization in Sorghum

Wang Jiaxu(), Zhang Fei, Zhang Kuangye, Ke Fulai, Wang Yanqiu, Lu Feng, Zhu Kai()   

  1. Sorghum Research Institute, Liaoning Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Shenyang 110161, Liaoning, China
  • Received:2022-06-24 Revised:2022-09-08 Online:2024-02-15 Published:2024-02-20
  • Contact: Zhu Kai E-mail:w15640044750@163.com;zhukai72@163.com

RichHTML

2

PDF (PC)

64

Abstract:

This research was set as a pot experiment, the sorghum variety Liaonuo 10 was used as the experimental material, and the conventional nitrogen application rate (300 kg/ha) was used as the control (N0), N1-N3 treatments showed a 10% gradient decrease in nitrogen fertilizer application rate (270, 240 and 210 kg/ha), N4-N6 treatments were combined with 3% 3,4-dimethylpyrazole phosphate (DMPP) on the basis of N1-N3, the application rates of phosphorus and potassium fertilizers were both 75 kg/ha. The results showed that, with the reduction of nitrogen fertilizer application, relative chlorophyll content (SPAD value), dry matter accumulation, total nitrogen accumulation, dry matter production efficiency, nitrogen dry matter production efficiency, nitrogen agronomic efficiency, and nitrogen fertilizer utilization rate gradually decreased. After the application of DMPP, the growth and development of sorghum returned to the level of conventional fertilization. Compared with the N0, the total nitrogen accumulation of N5 treatment (20% nitrogen reduction + 3% DMPP) increased by 4.67%; the grain weight per ear and 1000-grain weight increased by 3.72% and 5.58%, respectively; the dry matter production efficiency increased by 8.77%; the nitrogen dry matter production efficiency increased by 1.14%, and the nitrogen agronomic efficiency increased by 5.75%; the nitrogen fertilizer use efficiency and nitrogen fertilizer agronomic efficiency increased by 15.47% and 45.12%, respectively. In conclusion, when the nitrogen fertilizer application rate was reduced by 20%, adding 3% DMPP of the normal nitrogen application rate could improve the dry matter production efficiency and nitrogen utilization rate in sorghum, and had a certain potential for increasing yield.

Key words: Sorghum, Nitrogen fertilizer reduction, Nitrification inhibitor, Dry matter, Nitrogen utilization efficiency

Table 1

The application rates of nitrogen fertilizer and nitrification inhibitor in different treatments kg/hm2"

处理
Treatment		 氮肥
Nitrogen fertilizer		 硝化抑制剂
Nitrification inhibitor
N0 300 －
N1 270 －
N2 240 －
N3 210 －
N4 270 1.38
N5 240 1.38
N6 210 1.38

Fig.1

Effects of different nitrogen fertilizer application rates on SPAD value Different letters indicate significant differences at the 0.05 level, the same blow."

Fig.2

Effects of different nitrogen fertilizer application rates on dry matter accumulation"

Fig.3

Effects of different nitrogen fertilizer application rates on total amount of nitrogen accumulation"

Table 2

Effects of different nitrogen application rates on dry matter and nitrogen dry matter production efficiency"

处理
Treatment		 干物质生产效率
Dry matter production
efficiency (%)		 氮素干物质生产率
Nitrogen dry matter
production efficiency (%)
N0 154.02±1.02c 1.75±0.02a
N1 153.73±1.04c 1.74±0.02a
N2 151.95±1.34d 1.71±0.01ab
N3 151.54±1.52d 1.62±0.01b
N4 165.30±1.31a 1.76±0.02a
N5 167.53±1.14a 1.77±0.02a
N6 161.46±1.26b 1.73±0.01ab

Fig.4

Effects of different nitrogen application rates on NAE"

Table 3

Effects of different nitrogen application rates on nitrogen and nitrogen fertilizer agronomic efficiency %"

处理
Treatment		 NUE 氮肥农学利用率
Agronomic efficiency of nitrogen fertilizer
N0 27.80±1.14c 17.73±1.02b
N1 25.56±1.16d 16.68±1.19b
N2 22.38±1.12e 8.63±1.01c
N3 17.43±1.27f 4.46±0.96d
N4 32.88±1.64a 27.13±1.24a
N5 32.10±1.58a 25.73±1.15a
N6 30.71±1.57b 18.43±1.08b

Table 4

Effects of different nitrogen application rates on grain weight per ear and 1000-grain weight g"

处理
Treatment		 穗粒重
Grain weight per ear		 千粒重
1000-grain weight
N0 76.93±1.21b 28.52±0.34b
N1 75.78±1.31b 28.14±0.37b
N2 73.21±1.54b 27.89±0.56bc
N3 70.22±1.69c 26.70±0.67c
N4 82.34±1.52a 30.23±0.38a
N5 79.79±1.39a 30.11±0.36a
N6 78.48±1.66a 29.49±0.37a
[1] 邹剑秋, 王艳秋, 柯福来. 高粱产业发展现状及前景展望. 山西农业大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 40(3):2-8.
[2] 高杰, 李晓荣, 封广才, 等. 贵州新老两代糯高粱品种(系)产量和氮肥利用率的差异. 华北农学报, 2021, 36(增1):275-281.
[3] 董二伟, 王成, 丁玉川, 等. 高粱生长及其土壤环境对不同培肥措施的响应. 华北农学报, 2017, 32(2):217-225.
doi: 10.7668/hbnxb.2017.02.032
[4] 李顺国, 刘猛, 刘斐, 等. 中国高粱产业和种业发展现状与未来展望. 中国农业科学, 2021, 54(3):471-482.
doi: 10.3864/j.issn.0578-1752.2021.03.002
[5] 张飞, 王佳旭, 张旷野, 等. 低氮逆境下氮高效高粱群体微环境及光合荧光应答效应研究. 山西农业大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 41(3):32-41.
[6] Zhang X, Davidson E A, Mauzerall D L, et al. Managing nitrogen for sustainable development. Nature, 2015, 528(750):51-59.
doi: 10.1038/nature15743
[7] 王媛, 王劲松, 董二伟, 等. 长期施用不同剂量氮肥对高粱产量、氮素利用特性和土壤硝态氮含量的影响. 作物学报, 2021, 47(2):342-350.
doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1006.2021.04091
[8] 曹晓燕, 武爱莲, 王劲松, 等. 施氮量对高粱产量、品质及氮利用效率的影响. 作物杂志, 2021(2):108-115.
[9] 巨晓棠, 张翀. 论合理施氮的原则和指标. 土壤学报, 2021, 58(1):1-13.
[10] 刘鹏. 高粱不同基因型氮效率差异及其对低氮胁迫的生理响应. 太原:山西大学, 2018.
[11] 张满利, 陈盈, 隋国民, 等. 氮肥对水稻产量和氮肥利用率的影响. 中国农学通报, 2010, 26(13):230-234.
[12] 赵营, 同延安, 赵护兵. 不同供氮水平对夏玉米养分累积、转运及产量的影响. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2006, 12(5):622-627.
[13] 韩丽君, 薛张逸, 谢昊, 等. 干湿交替灌溉与硝化抑制剂对水稻产量及土壤性状的影响. 作物杂志, 2022(2):222-229.
[14] 陆玉芳, 施卫明. 生物硝化抑制剂的研究进展及其农业应用前景. 土壤学报, 2021, 58(3):545-557.
[15] 王莉, Saman B, 侯扶江. 生物硝化抑制剂(BNI)在提高农业生产系统中氮利用率方面的研究进展. 草业科学, 2020, 37 (3):592-601.
[16] 于春晓, 张丽莉, 杨立杰, 等. 减氮配施抑制剂及鸡粪提高尿素氮在稻田土壤中的转化及利用. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2021, 27(9):1581-1591.
[17] 崔磊, 李东坡, 武志杰, 等. 不同硝化抑制剂对红壤氮素硝化作用及玉米产量和氮素利用率的影响. 应用生态学报, 2021, 32(11):3953-3960.
doi: 10.13287/j.1001-9332.202111.022
[18] 鲁艳红, 聂军, 廖育林, 等. 氮素抑制剂对双季稻产量、氮素利用效率及土壤氮平衡的影响. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2018, 24(1):95-104.
[19] 段文静, 马彤彤, 张永江, 等. 氮肥中不同硝化抑制剂DCD添加比例对棉花生长发育及产量的影响. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2020, 26(11):2095-2106.
[20] 赵欧亚, 张春锋, 孙世友, 等. 含硝化抑制剂型水溶肥对温室黄瓜产量和品质的影响. 华北农学报, 2017, 32(增1):233-238.
[21] 郝胜磊, 蔡廷瑶, 冯小杰, 等. 新型肥料对全球三大粮食作物产量和土壤生物学活性影响的Meta分析. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2021, 27(9):1496-1505.
[22] 金何玉, 张明超, 陈光蕾, 等. 硝化抑制剂对糯玉米产量和氮肥利用率的影响. 华北农学报, 2020, 35(5):171-177.
doi: 10.7668/hbnxb.20191171
[23] 徐洪超, 商靖, 刘铭荟, 等. 氮代谢相关酶的研究进展. 安徽农业科学, 2022, 50(4):17-20.
[24] 徐晓鹏, 傅向东, 廖红. 植物铵态氮同化及其调控机制的研究进展. 植物学报, 2016, 51(2):152-166.
doi: 10.11983/CBB15077
[25] 张春楠, 张瑞芳, 王鑫鑫, 等. 硝化抑制剂和微生物菌剂对甜瓜产量及氮素利用的影响. 水土保持学报, 2020, 34(6):281-287,293.
[1] Wang Haitao, Ren Chunmei, Dong Yan, Li Shuo, Cheng Zhaobang, Ji Yinghua. Molecular Detection and Identification of Maize Yellow Mosaic Virus on Sorghum in Huai’an, Jiangsu [J]. Crops, 2024, 40(1): 233-238.
[2] Sun Yuantao, Long Wenjing, Li Yuan, Liu Tianpeng, Zhao Ganlin, Ding Guoxiang, Ni Xianlin. Genetic Diversity Analysis of 45 Glutinous Sorghum Germplasms Based on Major Agronomic Traits and SSR Markers [J]. Crops, 2024, 40(1): 57-64.
[3] Hao Zhiyong, Yang Guangdong, Hu Zunyan, Li Jinghua, Sun Bangsheng, Chen Linqi. Effects of Different Fertilizers on Yield, Agronomic Characteristics and Quality of Early Maturing Sorghum [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(6): 218-223.
[4] Wu Sheng, Duan Yu, Zhang Tingting, An Hao, Zhang Jun, Liang Junmei, Zhang Sheng. Relationships between Dry Matter Accumulation, Transport and Yield of Confectionary Sunflower and Response to Water and Nitrogen Interactions [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(6): 243-251.
[5] Zhang Fuyao, Ping Jun’ai, Jiao Xiaoyan. Research Status and Prospects of Barren Tolerance and Nutrient Efficient Utilization in Sorghum [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(6): 26-34.
[6] Fang Wenying, Zhu Defeng, Huai Yan, Chen Jiaqi, Chen Huizhe, Wang Yaliang. Analysis on the Effects of Precision Drill Sowing in Machine Transplanting for Single-Season Hybrid Rice to Improve Yield of Sparsely Planted Population [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(5): 124-130.
[7] Yang Mei, Yang Weijun, Gao Wencui, Jia Yonghong, Zhang Jinshan. Effects of Combined Application of Biochar and Nitrogen Fertilizer on Dry Matter Transport, Agronomic Characteristics and Yield of Winter Wheat in Irrigation Area [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(5): 138-144.
[8] Ling Yibo, Wang Binjie, Hu Yimin, Heinar·Madithermic mann, Chen Nianlai. Responses of Dry Matter Translocation and Yield Formation to Planting Density and Row Spacing of Sunflower [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(5): 197-203.
[9] Hu Xinyuan, Liu Yongqiang, Xie Kuizhong, Sun Xiaohua, Luo Aihua. Effects of Organic Fertilizer Replacing Nitrogen Fertilizer on Soil Physical Chemistry Properties and Potato Quality under Continuous Cropping in Arid Area [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(4): 159-164.
[10] Chen Bingru, Yu Miao, Shi Guishan, Wang Jianghong, Tang Yujie, Xu Chen, Li Haiqing, Xu Ning, Zhou Ziyang, Wang Nai. Breeding and Application of Elite Waxy Sorghum Male Sterile Line “Ji 5535A” [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(4): 260-266.
[11] Zhang Guozhong, Li Juan, Li Yucai, Jin Shoulin, Hong Ruke, Huang Dajun, Pu Shihuang, Shi Congbo, Duan Zilin, Ma Di, Chen Lijuan. The Effects of Nitrogen Fertilizer Reduction and Transplanting Density on Yield and Eating Quality of Japonica Hybrid Rice Dianheyou 615 [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(3): 109-115.
[12] Luo Siwei, Shi Xiunan, Jia Yonghong, Zhang Jinshan, Wang Kai, Li Dandan, Wang Runqi, Dong Yanxue, Shi Shubing. Effects of Drip Irrigation Capillary Spacing and Drop Spacing on Photosynthesis, Dry matter Accumulation, and Yield Formation of Uniformly Sown Winter Wheat [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(3): 230-237.
[13] Zhang Panpan, Li Chuan, Zhang Meiwei, Zhao Xia, Huang Lu, Liu Jingbao, Qiao Jiangfang. Effects of Nitrification Inhibitor on the Nitrogen Concentration and Yield in Summer Maize Plants and Soil under Reduced Nitrogen Application [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(2): 145-150.
[14] Xiao Jibing, Liu Zhi, Kong Fanxin, Xin Zongxu, Wu Hongsheng. Analysis of Agronomic Traits and Yield Stability of Sorghum Varieties Based on GGE Biplot [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(2): 36-45.
[15] Li Wenshan, Zhang Junyao, Tang Jianghua, Xu Wenxiu, Xu Qinghua. Effects of Different Doses of AFD on Growth and Yield of Cotton [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(1): 158-162.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!