Crops ›› 2023, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (6): 218-223.doi: 10.16035/j.issn.1001-7283.2023.06.030

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Effects of Different Fertilizers on Yield, Agronomic Characteristics and Quality of Early Maturing Sorghum

Hao Zhiyong(), Yang Guangdong(), Hu Zunyan, Li Jinghua, Sun Bangsheng, Chen Linqi   

  1. Keshan Branch of Heilongjiang Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Keshan 161606, Heilongjiang, China
  • Received:2022-07-04 Revised:2022-08-07 Online:2023-12-15 Published:2023-12-15

RichHTML

2

PDF (PC)

97

Abstract:

In order to study the effects of different fertilizers on extremely early maturing sorghum Keza 15 and Keza 19, conventional chemical fertilizer (CK), biological compound fertilizer (B1), slow-release fertilizer (B2) and compound fertilizer (B3) were applied as base fertilizer, respectively. The results showed that the yields of B2 and B3 treatments were significantly higher than those of CK and B1; the seeds per panicle of B2 and B3 treatments increased by about 3% compared with CK, and the difference among treatments reached a significant level; B2 and B3 treatments significantly increased plant height and peduncle length. The growth range of plant height was 5.5-7.5cm, and the growth range of peduncle length was 3.1-5.7cm. B2 and B3 treatments had higher relative chlorophyll contents in the late growth stage. B2 and B3 treatments significantly increased grain bulk density and starch contents compared with CK, while B1 significantly increased protein content in grains compared with CK. Comprehensive analysis showed that slow-release fertilizer (B2) and compound fertilizer (B3) treatments were the best treatments, which could significantly increase the yield of sorghum compared with conventional chemical fertilizer (CK). The yield of Keza 15 was about 7700kg/ha, with an increase of 3.19%-4.28%, and the yield of Keza 19 was about 8000kg/ha, with an increase of 5.08%-5.95%. B2 and B3 treatments also increased the bulk density of sorghum, improved the agronomic characteristics and maintained the good product quality.

Key words: Sorghum, Different fertilizers, Yield, Quality

Table 1

The experimental treatments kg/hm2"

处理
Treatment		 肥料类型
Fertilizer type		 施肥量
Fertilization amount
CK
 常规化肥
 磷酸氢二氨（N18-P2O546）225.0+大颗粒尿素（N46）238.5
B1 生物复混肥 （N17-P2O512-K2O11）882.0
B2 缓释肥 （N18-P2O518-K2O18）834.0
B3 复合肥 （N15-P2O515-K2O15）1000.5

Table 2

Effects of different fertilizers on yield and its components"

品种
Variety		 处理
Treatment		 产量
Yield (kg/hm2)		 单位面积有效穗数（×104株/hm2）
Effective panicles per unit area (×104 plants/hm2)		 穗粒数
Seeds per panicle		 千粒重
1000- grain weight (g)
克杂19号
Keza 19		 CK 7616.68c 31.67b 1297b 22.45a
B1 7833.27b 31.60b 1302b 22.51a
B2 8063.60a 32.12a 1337a 23.27a
B3 8069.72a 31.86ab 1338a 23.25a
克杂15号
Keza 15		 CK 7384.01b 32.31a 1271b 21.42a
B1 7417.59b 32.82a 1254b 21.27a
B2 7619.45a 32.50a 1316a 22.09a
B3 7700.18a 32.69a 1311a 22.28a

Table 3

Effects of different fertilizers on agronomic characteristics"

品种
Variety		 处理
Treatment		 株高
Plant
height (cm)		 穗长
Panicle
length (cm)		 穗柄长
Peduncle
length (cm)
克杂19号
Keza 19		 CK 96.24b 22.12a 40.77b
B1 96.60b 22.16a 40.60b
B2 103.18a 23.29a 45.00a
B3 102.39a 22.69a 43.90a
克杂15号
Keza 15		 CK 97.72b 20.79b 38.57b
B1 97.43b 20.93b 39.59b
B2 105.24a 23.03a 44.27a
B3 103.26a 23.19a 43.09a

Fig.1

Effects of different fertilizers on SPAD value of leaves"

Table 4

Effects of different fertilizers on grain quality"

品种
Variety		 处理
Treatment		 蛋白质含量
Protein
content (%)		 淀粉含量
Starch
content (%)		 容重
Bulk density
(g/L)
克杂19号
Keza 19		 CK 9.56c 71.11b 803.13b
B1 11.13a 70.01c 803.58b
B2 10.15b 72.58a 816.40a
B3 10.25b 72.44a 815.66a
克杂15号
Keza 15		 CK 9.41c 70.77b 749.08b
B1 10.91a 69.63c 749.13b
B2 10.02b 71.90a 765.53a
B3 9.97b 71.84a 765.18a

Table 5

Correlation between yield components and various characteristics"

指标Index 穗粒数Seeds per panicle 千粒重1000-grain weight 有效穗数Effective panicles 产量Yield
穗粒数Seeds per panicle － 0.5470** -0.4145* 0.8291**
千粒重1000-grain weight 0.5470** － -0.2086 0.7493**
有效穗数Effective panicles -0.4145* -0.2086 － -0.3206
成熟期叶片SPAD SPAD value of mature leaves 0.3950 0.4483* 0.3091 0.4563*
株高Plant height 0.4973* 0.3765 0.2180 0.3977
穗柄长Peduncle length 0.6568** 0.6209** 0.0948 0.6709**
穗长Panicle length 0.7464** 0.4025 -0.1708 0.6030**
容重Bulk density 0.3375 0.3979 -0.1866 0.4584*
淀粉含量Starch content 0.5210** 0.5513** -0.0040 0.8390**
蛋白质含量Protein content 0.0074 -0.0103 0.0233 0.1638
产量Yield 0.8291** 0.7493** -0.3206 －
[1] 刘晨阳, 张蕙杰, 辛翔飞. 中国高粱产业发展特征及趋势分析. 中国农业科技导报, 2020, 22(10):1-9.
doi: 10.13304/j.nykjdb.2019.0706
[2] 黄洪明, 吴美娟, 吴早贵, 等. 肥料类型与用量对春马铃薯产量性状及效益的影响. 浙江农业科学, 2019, 60(8):1450-1452.
[3] 李龙. 肥料类型和种植密度对玉米产量和养分积累转运的影响. 扬州:扬州大学, 2018.
[4] 刘淑娟, 刘虎俊, 刘光武, 等. 施用2种牛粪发酵肥对甜高粱生长量的影响. 中国农学通报, 2021, 37(19):22-26.
doi: 10.11924/j.issn.1000-6850.casb2020-0361
[5] 刘均霞, 赵小敏, 王平, 等. 不同有机肥施用量对高粱产量和效益的影响. 耕作与栽培, 2021, 41(3):64-65,70.
[6] 缑培欣, 陈智勇, 张阳阳, 等. 不同类型肥料对潮土冬小麦产量和品质及氮肥利用效率的影响. 麦类作物学报, 2021, 41(8):1-11.
[7] 邵丽, 谷洁, 张社奇, 等. 生物复混肥对土壤微生物群落功能多样性和微生物量的影响. 中国生态农业学报, 2012, 20(6):746-751.
[8] 高强, 李亚峰, 刘振刚, 等. 有机复混肥对土壤及甜椒产量和品质的影响. 吉林农业大学学报, 2001, 23(4):75-78.
[9] 范美蓉, 刘强, 荣湘民, 等. 有机无机复混肥对莴苣产量和品质的影响. 湖南农业大学学报(自然科学版), 2005(3):331-334.
[10] 曹涤环. 复合肥的合理选用. 湖南农业, 2016(10):13.
[11] 张华, 吴士强, 蒋保娟. 肥料类型及用量对夏玉米产量形成及氮肥效率的影响. 中国农学通报, 2010, 26(16):191-194.
[12] 黄翔, 毕小进, 陈钢, 等. 不同类型控释肥对辣椒生长及土壤养分和微生物的影响. 湖北农业科学, 2017, 56(2):237-241.
[13] 张运红, 孙克刚, 和爱玲, 等. 缓控释肥增产机制及其施用技术研究进展. 磷肥与复肥, 2015, 30(4):47-50.
[14] 杨劲峰, 鲁豫, 刘小华, 等. 施用炭基缓释肥对花生光合功能的影响. 植物营养与肥料学报, 2017, 23(2):408-415.
[15] 杨德桦. 不同施肥量和不同施肥方式对襄阳地区马铃薯产量、养分积累规律和品质的影响. 武汉:华中农业大学, 2012.
[16] 石元亮, 王玲莉, 刘世彬, 等. 中国化学肥料发展及其对农业的作用. 土壤学报, 2008, 45(5):852-864.
[17] Hao X Y, Chang C, Travis G J. Effect of long-term cattle manure application on relations between nitrogen and oil content in canola seed. Soil Science and Plant Nutrition, 2004, 167:214- 215.
doi: 10.1002/jpln.v167:2
[18] 肖雪玉, 朱文博, 杨丹, 等. 施用控释氮肥对早稻田面水氮素动态变化和水稻产量的影响. 生态环境学报, 2018, 27(12):2252-2257.
doi: 10.16258/j.cnki.1674-5906.2018.12.010
[19] 林清火, 刘海林, 黄艳艳, 等. 4种缓控释氮肥的养分释放特征及肥效. 热带作物学报, 2018, 39(9):1718-1723.
[20] 陈立才, 欧阳淑珍, 黄俊宝, 等. 肥料类型对机插中稻群体质量及氮肥农学利用率的影响. 东北农业科学, 2022, 47(3):15-20.
[21] 张瑞栋, 曹雄, 岳忠孝, 等. 氮肥和密度对高粱产量及氮肥利用率的影响. 作物杂志, 2018(5):110-115.
[22] 纪朋涛. 不同氮肥管理模式下夏玉米氮素利用与代谢特征及其生理机制. 保定:河北农业大学, 2021.
[23] Stals H, Inzé D. When plant cells decide to divide. Trends in Plant Science, 2001, 6(8):359-364.
doi: 10.1016/s1360-1385(01)02016-7 pmid: 11495789
[24] 严国红, 王永慧, 王爱民, 等. 肥料类型及用量对盐碱地甜高粱主要经济性状的影响. 江苏农业科学, 2013, 41(1):90-91.
[25] 高守山. 应用玉米一次深施复合肥对玉米产量及施肥效率影响的研究. 安徽农学通报, 2010, 16(10):54-55,96.
[26] 付青霞. 生物复混肥对猕猴桃果实品质及果园土壤微生态的影响. 杨凌:西北农林科技大学, 2014.
[27] Sitthaphanit S, Limpinuntana V, Toomsan B, et al. Growth and yield responses in maize to split and delayed fertilizer applications on sandy soils under high rainfall regimes. Kasetsart Journal, 2010, 44:991-1003.
[28] 杨立杰, 王兆凤, 吴晓静, 等. 不同品种类型玉米不同器官和全株生物产量比较. 动物营养学报, 2017, 29(9):3220-3231.
[29] 叶蕙, 刘伟, 陈巧玲, 等. 衰老叶片中叶绿素的降解. 西北植物学报, 2002, 22(2):229-235.
[30] 李翎. 氮素水平及形态对小麦叶绿体色素蛋白复合体的影响研究. 杨凌:西北农林科技大学, 2007.
[31] 丁小亮, 郭乾玲, 董婉婉, 等. 快速测定小麦、高粱、玉米容重方法的探讨. 酿酒, 2018, 45(3):109-111.
[32] 张丽, 董树亭, 刘存辉, 等. 玉米籽粒容重与产量和品质的相关分析. 中国农业科学, 2007, 40(2):405-411.
[1] Liu Zhewen, Guo Dandan, Chang Xuhong, Wang Demei, Wang Yanjie, Yang Yushuang, Liu Xiwei, Wang Yujiao, Shi Shubing, Zhao Guangcai. Response of Nitrogen Accumulation and Translocation after Anthesis in Strong Gluten Wheat to Nitrogen Topdressing Period and Proportion [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(6): 114-120.
[2] Zhou Xu, He Xiaolei, Cao Liang, Li Duo, Fu Chenye, Zhang Mingcong, Zhang Yuxian, Wang Mengxue. Effects of Different Water Stress and Rehydration at Seedling Stage on Antioxidant Properties and Yield of Soybean [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(6): 135-142.
[3] Yang Shanwei, Liang Renmin, Zhao Haihong, Wei Guijian, He Dengmei, Huang Xumou, Hu Zhongyin, Wei Chunxiang, Xu Chang, Wei Minchao, Wei Shuang, Luo Jiteng, Xu Yingying, Zhang Xiuhua, Han Yi, Wang Shiqiang. Effects of Low Temperature Stress at Booting Stage on Yield and Its Components of High Quality Fragrant Rice [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(6): 143-149.
[4] Liu Xiwei, Wang Demei, Wang Yanjie, Yang Yushuang, Zhao Guangcai, Chang Xuhong. Impacts Mechanism of Drought and Heat Stress in the Middle and Late Growing Period on Wheat Grain Yield Formation Process and Mitigation Measures [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(6): 17-25.
[5] Dong Haosheng, Wang Qi, Yan Peng, Xu Yanli, Zhang Wei, Lu Lin, Dong Zhiqiang. Effects of ECK on the Lodging Resistance and Yield of Foxtail Millet Stem [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(6): 181-189.
[6] Liang Zhongyu, Xue Jun, Zhang Guoqiang, Ming Bo, Shen Dongping, Fang Liang, Zhou Linli, Zhang Yuqin, Yang Hengshan, Wang Keru, Li Shaokun. Effects of Phosphorus Application Rate on Lodging Resistance of Maize under Integrated Water and Fertilizer [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(6): 190-194.
[7] Duan Junya, Zhao Yuanyuan, Wei Jianyu, Wang Dexun, Wang Zheng, Wang Tingting, Shi Hongzhi. Effects of Foliar Spraying Polyaspartic Acid on Growth, Yield and Quality of Flue-Cured Tobacco [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(6): 195-201.
[8] Xu Shihao, Zhao Chunbo, Huangfu Liyun, Fan Xintong, Chen Shanshan, Han Zhongcai, Han Yuzhu. Effects of Different Potassium Sources on Potassium Accumulation, Transport and Yield Components in Potato [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(6): 202-208.
[9] Zhao Lijie, Zhao Haiyan, Han Genlan, Wang Jiang, Nie Mengʼen, Du Huiling, Yuan Xiangyang, Dong Shuqi. Effects of Nitrogen Fertilizer Combined with Organic Fertilizer on Quality of Millet [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(6): 224-232.
[10] Zhang Fuyao, Ping Jun’ai, Jiao Xiaoyan. Research Status and Prospects of Barren Tolerance and Nutrient Efficient Utilization in Sorghum [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(6): 26-34.
[11] Gao Xiaoli, Huang Haijiao, Tian Pengjia, Nimayangzong , Chang Zihui, Labazhaxi , Liao Wenhua, Yang Wencai. Evaluation of Production Performance and Quality of Forage Pea in Alpine Region by Membership Function Method [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(6): 86-93.
[12] Li Xinghe, Wang Haitao, Liu Cunjing, Tang Liyuan, Zhang Sujun, Cai Xiao, Zhang Xiangyun, Zhang Jianhong. QTL Mapping for Fiber Quality Traits Using Gossypium barbadense Chromosome Segment Introgression Lines [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(5): 1-9.
[13] Wang Zhenlong, Su Cuicui, Zhou Qi, Deng Chaochao, Zhou Yanfang. The Effects of Reducing Nitrogen Fertilizer and Applying Organic Fertilizer on the Yield, Quality, and Soil Quality of Helianthus tuberosus L. [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(5): 104-109.
[14] Liu Yan, Qu Hang, Xing Yuehua, Wang Xiaohui, Gong Liang. Effects of New Types of Nitrogen Fertilizer on Rice Growth, Nitrogen Use Efficiency and Economic Benefit [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(5): 110-116.
[15] Liu Qiuyuan, Li Meng, Gao Yangguang, Shi Mengyu, Wei Yunfei, Ji Xin, Li Li, Liu Yali, Wang Fujuan. Effects of Different Nitrogen Fertilization Patterns on Yield and Quality of Conventional Japonica Rice under Reduced Nitrogen [J]. Crops, 2023, 39(5): 131-137.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited
  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!