Crops ›› 2025, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (4): 104-110.doi: 10.16035/j.issn.1001-7283.2025.04.013

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Comparison of High and Stable Yield Characteristics of Different Genotypes of Wheat under Dryland and Supplemental Irrigation Conditions

Sun Xianyin1(), Zhang Jibo2, Lü Guangde1, Qi Xiaolei1, Sun Yingying1, Mi Yong1(), Mu Qiuhuan1, Yin Xundong1, Wang Ruixia1, Qian Zhaoguo1, Gao Minggang3()   

  1. 1Taian Academy of Agricultural Science, Taian 271000, Shandong, China
    2Shandong Provincial Meteorological Center, Jinan 250031, Shandong, China
    3Weifang University, Weifang 261061, Shandong, China
  • Received:2024-06-21 Revised:2024-07-20 Online:2025-08-15 Published:2025-08-12

Abstract:

Drought is a common problem that seriously affects the production of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Different wheat lines under drought stress were examined in order to identify genotypes with high and stable yield and excellent drought tolerance. The experiment was conducted in 2022-2023, using 14 wheat lines with different genotypes as materials, under a randomized block design, rain feeding and irrigation conditions, and each treatment replicated three times. Drought resistance coefficient, drought resistance index and GGE biplot were used to compare the yield characteristics of different strains based on plot yield. The results showed that there were highly significant genetic differences in dryland yield and drought resistance index among different genotypes. The dryland yield, drought resistance index and drought resistance coefficient were all highly significantly positively correlated with each other. On the basis of variance analysis, the high and stable yield parameters of different genotypes were compared, and the positions of each strain in the GGE biplot were also compared to screen out the wheat lines with high and stable yield genotypes, V14 and V2. Therefore, the comparison of drought resistance parameters combined with GGE analysis could be used to better evaluate the drought resistance, high and stable yield and adaptability of different genotypes of wheat under the conditions of dryland and supplementary irrigation.

Key words: Wheat, Drought stress, Drought resistance parameters, Biplot, High yield, Stable yield

Fig.1

Changes of monthly precipitation, annual monthly precipitation, monthly average temperature and annual monthly average temperature in 2022-2023"

Table 1

The 14 wheat genotype names and hybrid combinations for drought tolerance assessment"

编号Number 名称Name 组合Combination 编号Number 名称Name 组合Combination 编号Number 名称Name 组合Combination
V1 洛旱7号 豫麦49/山农45 V6 5206108 山农25/济麦22 V11 5207813 鲁原185/良星99
V2 5204128 7088(H)/CG15-009 V7 5207357 济麦22/泰农9236 V12 5850913 LS5539/SN09-63
V3 5204550 众信8678/良星517 V8 5206121 山农25/良星77 V13 596655 济麦22/泰山28
V4 5204711 济麦22/众信8678 V9 5206222 山农25/众信5199 V14 TKM4835 良星99/KY088
V5 5205169 烟农21/FC009 V10 5207499 济麦22/泰山28

Table 2

Evaluation criteria of drought resistance of wheat during the whole growth period"

抗旱等级
Drought resistance grade
抗旱指数
Drought resistance index
抗旱性
Drought resistance
1 ≥1.3000 极强
2 1.1000~1.2999
3 0.9000~1.0999 中等
4 0.7000~0.8999
5 ≤0.6999 极弱

Table 3

Analysis of variance of Yp, Ys, and drought tolerance indexes for 14 wheat genotypes"

变异来源Source of variation 自由度df 旱地产量Ys 补灌产量Yp 抗旱系数DRC 抗旱指数DRI
重复Replication 2 110 494.1 170 953.6 0.0194 1.2051
基因型Genotype 13 268 297.6** 120 838.7* 0.0096* 0.0639**
误差Error 26 55 833.3 55 626.7 0.0040 0.0184

Table 4

Changes of Ys, Yp and drought tolerance indexes of 14 wheat genotypes"

指标
Index
旱地产量
Ys (kg/hm2)
补灌产量
Yp (kg/hm2)
抗旱系数
DRC
抗旱指数
DRI
平均值Mean 8496.75 9234.80 0.9204 1.1862
最大值Max. 9301.67 9742.22 0.9912 1.3875
最小值Min. 7350.56 8402.78 0.7946 0.8830
标准差SD 598.11 401.40 0.0571 0.1456
变异系数CV (%) 7.04 4.35 6.20 12.27

Table 5

Values of Ys, Yp and drought tolerance indexes of 14 wheat genotypes"

编号Number 旱地产量Ys (kg/hm2) 补灌产量Yp (kg/hm2) 抗旱系数DRC 抗旱指数DRI 抗旱等级Drought resistance grade
V1 7456.67b 8402.78a 0.8874a 1.0005ab 3
V2 9005.56ab 9571.67a 0.9409a 1.2810ab 2
V3 8366.67ab 8812.22a 0.9494a 1.2010ab 2
V4 8372.22ab 9670.56a 0.8657a 1.0959ab 3
V5 8294.44ab 9742.22a 0.8514a 1.0677ab 3
V6 8000.00ab 9134.44a 0.8758a 1.0593ab 3
V7 9301.67a 9428.33a 0.9866a 1.3875a 1
V8 8540.00ab 9221.67a 0.9261a 1.1957ab 2
V9 8977.78ab 9057.22a 0.9912a 1.3455ab 1
V10 8943.33ab 9437.78a 0.9476a 1.2813ab 2
V11 8297.78ab 8601.67a 0.9647a 1.2102ab 2
V12 9027.78ab 9370.00a 0.9635a 1.3151ab 1
V13 7350.56b 9251.11a 0.7946a 0.8830b 4
V14 9020.00ab 9585.56a 0.9410a 1.2833ab 2

Table 6

The correlation between Ys, Yp and drought tolerance indexes of 14 wheat genotypes"

相关系数
Correlation coefficient
旱地产量
Ys
补灌产量
Yp
抗旱系数
DRC
抗旱指数
DRI
旱地产量Ys 1.00
补灌产量Yp 0.48* 1.00
抗旱系数DRC 0.79** -0.15 1.00
抗旱指数DRI 0.96** 0.20 0.94** 1.00

Table 7

Analysis of variance of Yp, Ys for 14 wheat genotypes"

变异来源
Source of variation
自由度
df
平方和
SS
均方
MS
F检验
F-test
显著性
Significance
占总变异的百分比
Proportion of the total variation (%)
区组Blocks 4 0.8106 0.2026 2.5251 0.0518 4.95
基因型效应Genotype effect 13 5.2707 0.4054 5.0521 0.0001 32.17
环境效应Environmental effect 1 4.1181 4.1181 51.3155 0.0001 25.13
互作效应Interaction effect 13 2.0140 0.1549 1.9305 0.0477 12.29
残差Residual 52 4.1731 0.0803 25.47
总变异Total variation 83 16.3864 100.00

Table 8

Comparison of high and stable yield characteristics of 14 wheat genotypes"

编号
Number
丰产性参数
High yield parameter
稳定性参数
Stability parameter
产量
Yield (kg/hm2)
效应
Effect
方差
Variance
变异度
Variability
V7 9365.00aA 0.2995 0.067 4.6163
V14 9302.78aA 0.2622 0.005 1.3112
V2 9288.61aA 0.2537 0.005 1.3089
V12 9198.89abA 0.1999 0.028 3.0427
V10 9190.56abA 0.1949 0.011 1.8743
V4 9021.39abAB 0.0934 0.057 4.3915
V5 9018.33abAB 0.0915 0.091 5.5648
V9 9017.50abAB 0.0910 0.078 5.1645
V8 8880.83abcAB 0.0090 0.001 0.4490
V3 8589.44abcAB -0.1658 0.015 2.4079
V6 8567.22abcAB -0.1791 0.028 3.2716
V11 8449.72abcAB -0.2496 0.034 3.6333
V13 8300.83bcAB -0.3390 0.243 9.9028
V1 7929.72cB -0.5616 0.008 1.8553

Fig.2

Function maps of “high yield vs. stable yield” (a) and “ranking genotypes” (b) in GGE biplots of 14 wheat genotypes E1 represents drought conditions, E2 represents supplementary irrigation conditions."

Fig.3

Function map of “suitability region division” in GGE biplot of grain yield of 14 wheat genotypes"

[1] Fang Y J, Xiong L Z. General mechanisms of drought response and their application in drought resistance improvement in plants. Cellular and Molecular Life Science, 2015, 72(4):673-689.
[2] Morison J I L, Baker N R, Mullineaux P M, et al. Improving water use in crop production. Philosophical Transaction of the Royal Society B, 2008, 363(1491):639-658.
[3] 乔文君, 杨晗, 杨红, 等. 高产抗旱节水高水效冬小麦品种鉴选研究. 麦类作物学报, 2023, 43(10):1254-1266.
[4] 安浩军, 李晓静, 翟晓玲, 等. 限水条件下不同类型冬小麦品种产量及光合特性的变化. 江苏农业科学, 2023, 51(10):119-125.
[5] 张正斌. 作物抗旱节水的生理遗传育种基础. 北京: 科学出版社, 2003.
[6] 景蕊莲, 昌小平. 小麦抗旱种质资源的遗传多样性. 西北植物学报, 2003, 23(3):410-416.
[7] 金善宝. 中国小麦学. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 1996.
[8] 陈生斗. 中国小麦育种与产业化进展. 北京: 中国农业出版社, 2002.
[9] Trethowan R M, Ginkel M V, Rajaram S. Progress in breeding wheat for yield and adaptation in global drought affected environments. Crop Science, 2002, 42(5):1441-1446.
[10] Tesfaye M D, Cao F B, Wasim I, et al. Differences in physiological and biochemical characteristics in response to single and combined drought and salinity stresses between wheat genotypes differing in salt tolerance. Physiologia Plantarum, 2019, 165(2):134-143.
[11] Sukumaran S, Reynolds M P, Sansaloni C. Genome-wide association analyses identify QTL hotspots for yield and component traits in durum wheat grown under yield potential, drought, and heat stress environments. Frontiers in Plant Science, 2018, 9:81.
[12] 冀天会, 张灿军, 谢惠民, 等. 小麦品种抗旱性鉴定产量指标的比较研究. 中国农学通报, 2006, 22(1):103-106.
[13] 孙宪印, 米勇, 王超, 等. 基因型和环境及其互作效应对旱肥地小麦产量性状的影响. 分子植物育种, 2021, 19(17):5899-5908.
[14] 魏鹏程, 陈杜, 罗英舰, 等. 基于AMMI和GGE双标图的贵州不同生态区春玉米丰产性稳产性和试点辨别力评价. 玉米科学, 2023, 31(1):22-31.
[15] 万星, 刘燚, 肖本泽. 基于AMMI模型和GGE双标图分析长江中下游水稻区试品种的适应性. 中南农业科技, 2024, 45(1):7-11,25.
[16] 肖继兵, 刘志, 孔凡信, 等. 基于GGE双标图的高粱品种农艺性状和稳产性分析. 作物杂志, 2023(2):36-45.
[17] 孙瑞, 杨刚, 张华, 等. 基于GGE双标图的北方旱寒区冬油菜适应性分析. 干旱地区农业研究, 2023, 41(5):12-21.
[18] 孟祥海, 李丁, 孙书娈, 等. 抗旱节水型衡麦系列品种的选育方法及系谱分析. 麦类作物学报, 2017, 37(7):907-914.
[19] Nouri A, Etminan A, Teixeira J A, et al. Assessment of yield,yield-related traits and drought tolerance of durum wheat genotypes (Triticum turjidum var. durum Desf.). Australian Journal of Crop Science, 2011, 5(1):8-16.
[20] Sallam A, Alqudah A M, Dawood M F A, et al. Drought stress tolerance in wheat and barley: advances in physiology, breeding and genetics research. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 2019, 20(13):3137.
[1] Yin Junhua, Deng Li, Guo Minjie, Miao Jianli, Hu Junping, Li Shaowei, Ren Li. Comprehensive Evaluation of Small-Seeded Peanut Varieties Based on BLUP Values and GGE Biplot [J]. Crops, 2025, 41(4): 118-125.
[2] Li Yun, Wang Jing, Liu Yankun, Zhao Guanghui, Zheng Minna. Regulation of Yield and Lodging Resistance of Stem in Tartary Buckwheat by Paclobutrazol Leaf Spraying [J]. Crops, 2025, 41(4): 231-237.
[3] Zhang Zhihan, Yao Jie, Zhang Zhantian, Bian Fuhua, Zhang Ziran, Chen Ping, Chen Haining, Liu Baoyou. Effects of 5-Aminolevulinic Acid on Cucumber Seedling Growth and Soil Enzyme Activities under Drought Stress [J]. Crops, 2025, 41(4): 245-250.
[4] Luo Xinggang, Wan Haiyuan, An Lirong, Li Yonghai, Luo Xingyu, Zhang Xuekai, Liang Weiyun, Zhu Jianqiang. Effects of Different Varieties and Nitrogen Application Rate on Border Effect, Yield, and Water Use Efficiency of Spring Wheat under Ridge Tillage with Drill Sowing [J]. Crops, 2025, 41(4): 251-258.
[5] Wang Zhigang, Liu Qiang, Wang Jin, Gong Jingjin, Yao Qunying. Simulation of Response of Spring Wheat Yield and Biomass to Nitrogen Application Rate and Sowing Date in Dryland under Future Meteorological Conditions [J]. Crops, 2025, 41(4): 276-282.
[6] Huang Jie, Wang Jun, Cao Yanyan, Ge Changbin, Liao Pingʼan, Qiao Jiliang, Zhou Yang, Zhang Zhenyong, Sun Xianye. Characteristics of Grain Filling and Dehydration Rate and Their Relationships with Yield of Different Wheat Varieties [J]. Crops, 2025, 41(4): 49-57.
[7] Dou Yang, Chen Junyi, Ren Shumin, Kang Guozhang, Wang Liming. Composition Analysis of High Molecular Weight Glutenin Subunits in 121 Wheat Varieties (Lines) [J]. Crops, 2025, 41(4): 75-79.
[8] Lü Shuli, Tian Zhuangbo, Ding Fang, Lü Zhuoyang. Comprehensive Analysis of High Yield and High Quality Sesame Shangzhi 6 Based on GGE Biplot and TOPSIS Method [J]. Crops, 2025, 41(4): 80-86.
[9] Hou Yue, Wang Hongliang, Li Jie, Li Chunjie, Chen Fanjun. Research Advances on the Effects of Cereal/Legume Forage Intercropping on Forage Quality and Nitrogen Uptake [J]. Crops, 2025, 41(3): 1-10.
[10] He Yunxia, Ma Jianhui, Zhang Daijing, Liu Donghua, Chao Xiaoyan, Chen Huiping, Li Chunxi. Study on the Effect of Different Nitrogen Fertilizer Synergists on Reducing Gaseous Nitrogen Loss and Increasing Yield in Wheat Field of Northern Henan [J]. Crops, 2025, 41(3): 108-115.
[11] Hou Xiaomin, Shen Huibo, Dong Shoukun, Yan Feng, Dong Yang, Zhao Fuyang, Li Qingquan, Zuo Yuetao. Physiological Effects of Mepiquat Chloride on Alleviating Drought Stress in Soybean Seedling Leaves [J]. Crops, 2025, 41(3): 133-140.
[12] Wang Jiatong, Ma Yingchen, Feng Yanfei, Lu Jiahui, Guo Zhenqing, Li Xueli, Li Yun, Han Yucui, Lin Xiaohu. Effects of Reduction of Nitrogen Topdressing Application on Phosphorus and Potassium Fertilizer Utilization and Quality of Spring Wheat in Eastern Hebei Province [J]. Crops, 2025, 41(3): 141-148.
[13] Li Jiahao, Jia Yonghong, Lian Shihao, Liu Yue, Yu Shan, Tian Wenqiang, Wang Ziqian, Zhang Jinshan, Shi Shubing. Effects of Prohexadione-Calcium and Phosphorus Application Rate on the Growth, Dry Matter Accumulation, and Yield of Winter Wheat [J]. Crops, 2025, 41(3): 165-171.
[14] Fan Ming, Li Hongxia, Wang Ke, Tang Huali, Yang Le, Li Qianrong, Ye Xingguo, Zhang Shuangxi. Breeding and Cultivation Techniques of a New Wheat Variety Ningchun 66 with Powdery Mildew Resistance [J]. Crops, 2025, 41(3): 249-254.
[15] Huang Ming, Fu Xinxin, Zhang Zhenwang, Zhang Jun, Li Youjun. Effects of Seed Sizes on Seed Germination, Seedling Characteristics and Drought Resistance of Dryland Wheat [J]. Crops, 2025, 41(3): 255-262.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
No Suggested Reading articles found!